[Bug 1971469] Re: FTBFS against openssl 3
** Changed in: cyrus-imapd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971469 Title: FTBFS against openssl 3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-imapd/+bug/1971469/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1959639] [NEW] Running autopkgtest in lxc crashes host's ntp
On Monday, January 31, 2022 9:51:59 PM EST Bryce Harrington wrote: > Comparing the build log from 3.6.3 with the autopkgtest log for 3.6.4, > these lines jump out at me: > > ### 3.6.3 ### > > install -m644 debian/postfix.insserv.conf > debian/postfix/etc/insserv.conf.d/postfix txt2man -t postfix-collate -r > postfix-3.6.3 -d -s 1 auxiliary/collate/README > > debian/postfix/usr/share/man/man1/postfix-collate.1 expand: 1: No such file > or directory > install man/man1/*.1 debian/postfix/usr/share/man/man1 > > ### 3.6.4 ### > > install -m644 debian/postfix.insserv.conf > debian/postfix/etc/insserv.conf.d/postfix txt2man -t postfix-collate -r > postfix-3.6.4 -d 'Mon Jan 31 09:42:30 PM UTC 2022' -s 1 > auxiliary/collate/README > > debian/postfix/usr/share/man/man1/postfix-collate.1 install man/man1/*.1 > debian/postfix/usr/share/man/man1 This was due to a quoting error in debian/rules in 3.6.3. What's being expanded there is: '$(shell date -s @$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH))' Nothing to do with NTP. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959639 Title: Running autopkgtest in lxc crashes host's ntp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1959639/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1957884] Re: postfix warns about differing chroot files after package upgrades
In theory, yes. In practice, it would be very complicated and it's not something that's likely to get done in the near-term. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957884 Title: postfix warns about differing chroot files after package upgrades To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1957884/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1957884] Re: postfix warns about differing chroot files after package upgrades
Does restarting (not reloading) or stopping/starting postfix get things back in sync? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957884 Title: postfix warns about differing chroot files after package upgrades To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1957884/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1519331] Re: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop
It's postfix@$INSTANCE. If you don't have multi-instance setup, the default instance is "-", so you would look for postfix@-, not postfix@. This is discussed in README.Debian. You should probably file a new bug for this problem if you don't get it figured out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519331 Title: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1519331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1956505] Re: Merge 3.6.3-5 from debian
On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 11:13:49 AM EST you wrote: > Also check if we can get rid of the delta and make postfix a sync again. No. The glibc change isn't incorporated. It would be nice if someone from a distro (like Ubuntu) that has applied the patch would talk to upstream about it and get them to incorporate it. I don't plan to add it as a patch unless Debian actually needs it, which we don't so far. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956505 Title: Merge 3.6.3-5 from debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1956505/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1954573] Re: error on verifying inbound mail
Thanks. I'll reassign this to Ubuntu's dkimpy package. They should consider doing a stable release update to fix this. ** Project changed: dkimpy-milter => dkimpy (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: dkimpy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: dkimpy (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954573 Title: error on verifying inbound mail To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkimpy/+bug/1954573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915238] Re: warning: /var/spool/postfix/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt and /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt differ
Not a ca-certificates issue. ** Changed in: ca-certificates (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915238 Title: warning: /var/spool/postfix/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt and /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt differ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/1915238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915238] Re: warning: /var/spool/postfix/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt and /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt differ
This is an unneeded leftover and the file in the chroot (/var/spool/postfix) can be deleted. When using smtp*_tls_CAfile, the smtp or smtpd daemon copies from /etc/ssl/certs before entering the chroot (CApath is different), so it doesn't need to be there. We stopped copying the file into the chroot in 3.4.7-1, but didn't clean up the old one. I've committed a change to the Debian postfix git repository, which will be in the next Debian upload, to do this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915238 Title: warning: /var/spool/postfix/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt and /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt differ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/1915238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915238] Re: warning: /var/spool/postfix/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt and /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt differ
So I looked into this a bit more and based on http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_tls_CAfile is doesn't appear to me that the ca-certificates.crt file needs to be in the chroot at all. What happens if you just delete the chroot copy? Looking in the git history, I can see we used to install this file into the chroot, but I'm not sure we needed to. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915238 Title: warning: /var/spool/postfix/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt and /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt differ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/1915238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1955581] [NEW] Consider merge/synch from Debian
Public bug reported: Debian now has jack-mixer 17. This might be a good time to see if a sync is possible or at least do a merge so it's clear what's different between the packages. ** Affects: jack-mixer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955581 Title: Consider merge/synch from Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jack-mixer/+bug/1955581/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939353] Re: FTBFS 3.5.6-1build1 with gcc-11
Incorporation of this patch in postfix upstream is currently being discussed on the postfix-users mailing list. The specific question asked by Wietse is: Has this been adopted, or do people on 3.5.* still have to tinker with their /etc/resolv.conf files? If anyone from Ubuntu could comment on that, it would be great. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939353 Title: FTBFS 3.5.6-1build1 with gcc-11 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1939353/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915238] Re: warning: /var/spool/postfix/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt and /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt differ
I'm open to putting a fix in Debian. I haven't come up with a solution that I'm happy with and don't currently have a lot of time to work on this. I think Paride Legovini's "wall-of-text" post is on the right track, but I would really prefer to avoid asking a question about this. Anything in configure-instance.sh needs to be init system agnostic. I don't mind a systemd specific solution since that's our default init, but not in configure-instance.sh (no idea if there is one, but that's a boundary condition to a proper fix in my view). If someone comes up with a patch, I can test it and will be glad to land it in Debian if suitable and functional. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915238 Title: warning: /var/spool/postfix/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt and /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt differ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/1915238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1885403] Re: posttls-finger fails to connect to private/tlsmgr
No. We've had postfix in a chroot since approximately forever. It might be something in default path resolution has changed? Since I no longer us Ubuntu, I really don't know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885403 Title: posttls-finger fails to connect to private/tlsmgr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1885403/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1885403] Re: posttls-finger fails to connect to private/tlsmgr
We (Debian and derivatives such as Ubuntu) have postfix in a chroot by default. This is a side effect of that configuration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885403 Title: posttls-finger fails to connect to private/tlsmgr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1885403/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1881196] Re: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many"
On Thursday, June 18, 2020 9:46:34 AM EDT you wrote: > To do that a process needs to be defined for future Postfix SRUs > containing micro-release updates. I see we already have some good DEP-8 > tests, so we'd need to write a wiki page describing this process and ask > the SRU team to acknowledge it. I am offering myself to drive this if > that is the case. The Ubuntu Technical Board already approved this. See: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2011-October/ 000902.html https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2012-May/001266.html Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881196 Title: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1881196/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1881196] Re: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many"
On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 5:51:07 PM EDT Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > I see this fix in version 3.4.13. Hopefully this postfix SRU [1] will be > accepted and we will have version 3.4.11 in Focal, so we have two patch > level releases to consider if we want to update to 3.4.13. Checking the > changelog between 3.4.11 and 3.4.13 there are 6 "Bugfix", 3 "Noise > suppression", and 1 "Bitrot". After a discussion with my team they told > me we would need to define self-contained test cases for each of those > bug fixes and analyze the impact of the non "Bugfix" changes to convince > the SRU team to accept this new micro release. This did not used to be the case for micro-releases where the TB approved the micro-release exception (as is the case here). Back when I was doing this for Ubuntu it was enough that the postfix passed it's test suite and it had been smoke tested on a real system. We do these updates in Debian routinely without anything more than that and have never had a problem. I'd find it surprising that Ubuntu was being more restrictive about post-release updates than Debian. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881196 Title: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1881196/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1883331] Re: DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive results in failed installation
installed postfix package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 75 This exist status indicates the system does not have a proper hostname set. It is a local configuration issue and not a package bug. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883331 Title: DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive results in failed installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1883331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1657024] Re: mydomain gets set to "localdomain"
I looked into the history of this. We used to have a patch in Debian to
use gethostbyname to address this issue. It was dropped because it
caused worse problems. Here's the relevant code snippet from the most
recent postfix release:
/*
* If the local machine name is not in FQDN form, try to append the
* contents of $mydomain. Use a default domain as a final workaround.
*
* DO NOT CALL GETHOSTBYNAME OR GETNAMEINFO HERE - IT MAKES EVERY POSTFIX
* PROGRAM HANG WHEN DNS SERVICE IS UNAVAILABLE. IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE
* DEFAULT, THEN EDIT MAIN.CF.
*/
name = get_hostname();
/* DO NOT CALL GETHOSTBYNAME OR GETNAMEINFO HERE - EDIT MAIN.CF */
if ((dot = strchr(name, '.')) == 0) {
/* DO NOT CALL GETHOSTBYNAME OR GETNAMEINFO HERE - EDIT MAIN.CF */
if ((domain = mail_conf_lookup_eval(VAR_MYDOMAIN)) == 0)
domain = DEF_MYDOMAIN;
/* DO NOT CALL GETHOSTBYNAME OR GETNAMEINFO HERE - EDIT MAIN.CF */
name = concatenate(name, ".", domain, (char *) 0);
}
/* DO NOT CALL GETHOSTBYNAME OR GETNAMEINFO HERE - EDIT MAIN.CF */
return (name);
So the way to resolve this issue is to edit main.cf as people have
indicated they are doing. "Fixing" this in postfix is not something we
should do.
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657024
Title:
mydomain gets set to "localdomain"
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1657024/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1881196] Re: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many"
https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix/commit/ 119d6abed969b1b30c62722ae31c854b5682beae#diff-1843f98f5710e97bd063d5807334442a There will be a new 3.4 release in a few days, I'd just update your SRU to encompass that when it comes out. It's all bug fixes, reported by users or not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881196 Title: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1881196/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr
In that case, someone with the new libc and postfix 3.4.11/3.5.2 or later should write to the postfix-users list and ask for help. My recollection is that the upstream developers did not have access to a system with the new libc and were dependent on third party testing, so something may have been missed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868955 Title: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1868955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr
On Monday, June 8, 2020 4:59:30 PM EDT you wrote: > postfix (3.5.2-1+b1) sid; urgency=low, binary-only=yes > . >* Binary-only non-maintainer upload for amd64; no source changes. >* Rebuild against libicu67 > . > -- all / amd64 / i386 Build Daemon (x86-conova-01) > Wed, 03 Jun 2020 20:54:57 > + > > Do we need this in Groovy? No. It's unrelated. Ubuntu does source uploads when rebuilds are needed in any case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868955 Title: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1868955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr
That change is included in postfix 3.4.11 which is, of course, just after the one that's in 20.04. "Someone" (i.e. not me) should look into an SRU to update postfix. It has an existing microversion release authorization from the Tech Board, so it shouldn't be too hard, it just takes someone involved in Ubuntu development to turn the crank on the process. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868955 Title: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1868955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr
Re-assigning to glibc then. I think that's a good demonstration this isn't a postfix issue. ** Package changed: postfix (Ubuntu) => glibc (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868955 Title: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1868955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1881196] Re: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many"
Postfix doesn't have a bug tracker. Their policy is to fix bugs when they are identified. Emailing postfix-users is the correct path forward. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881196 Title: postfix tls deploy-server-cert fails with "can't shift that many" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1881196/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1880970] Re: Postfix refuses to start because file postfix-files is missing
That's almost certainly not the case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880970 Title: Postfix refuses to start because file postfix-files is missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1880970/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1880970] Re: Postfix refuses to start because file postfix-files is missing
The package ships the file, so it's not a postfix bug. https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/amd64/postfix/filelist ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880970 Title: Postfix refuses to start because file postfix-files is missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1880970/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556681] Re: python-pip requires python-setuptools but not drawn in as a dependancy
Fixed in focal and later up to the point where the package was removed. ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556681 Title: python-pip requires python-setuptools but not drawn in as a dependancy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pip/+bug/1556681/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1676675] Re: python3-pip package missing dependency for python3-pyparsing
Fixed in bionic and later. ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1676675 Title: python3-pip package missing dependency for python3-pyparsing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pip/+bug/1676675/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773794] Re: python3-pip now requires python3-distutils
Fixed in focal and later. ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773794 Title: python3-pip now requires python3-distutils To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pip/+bug/1773794/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1635463] Re: pip freeze includes "pkg-resources==0.0.0"
Fixed in Focal/Groove. ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1635463 Title: pip freeze includes "pkg-resources==0.0.0" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1635463/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1860270] Re: python-bleach: autopkgtest regression in -release
This was fixed by reverting the breaking change in python3 3.7 and 3.8. ** Changed in: python-bleach (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860270 Title: python-bleach: autopkgtest regression in -release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-bleach/+bug/1860270/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1444968] Re: Postfix init.d scripts malfunction in an unprivilleged Docker container
This was fixed in 3.4.7-2. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444968 Title: Postfix init.d scripts malfunction in an unprivilleged Docker container To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1444968/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1548594] Re: Convert test suite to python 3.0
This was fixed in 3.4.7-2. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548594 Title: Convert test suite to python 3.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1548594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1684037] Re: Wrong systemd dependencies prevent postfix from starting
This was fixed in 3.3.2-1. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1684037 Title: Wrong systemd dependencies prevent postfix from starting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1684037/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1460203] Re: Drop set_user_default.patch
In any case, this bug was about dropping deltas from Debian, not upstream and Debian/Ubuntu handle this the same now. ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-15.10 => None -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460203 Title: Drop set_user_default.patch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pip/+bug/1460203/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1873369] Re: Python2 virtualenv installs broken pip command
It's fixed in python-virtualenv 20.0.20+ds-1 and python-pip 20.1-1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873369 Title: Python2 virtualenv installs broken pip command To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-virtualenv/+bug/1873369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1586381] Re: Pip states report "AttributeError: 'Requirement' object has no attribute 'project_name'" since python-pip (8.1.1-2ubuntu0.1)
** No longer affects: python-pip (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: python-pip (Ubuntu Xenial) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586381 Title: Pip states report "AttributeError: 'Requirement' object has no attribute 'project_name'" since python-pip (8.1.1-2ubuntu0.1) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1586381/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869431] Re: TypeError: '>' not supported between instances of 'Version' and 'Version'
This was due to an incompatibility between the way pip and setuptools manage their vendored modules. The problem was worked around by a change in the Debian python-pip package (20.0.2-4) which was sync'ed into Ubuntu. It's not a virtualenv bug. python-pip | 20.0.2-5ubuntu1 | focal/universe | source python-pip | 20.0.2-5ubuntu1 | groovy/universe | source ** Changed in: python-virtualenv (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869431 Title: TypeError: '>' not supported between instances of 'Version' and 'Version' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-virtualenv/+bug/1869431/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1579181] Re: "pip3 list --outdated" raises TypeError
The fix for this was included in 20.0.2-4 imported from Debian. python-pip | 20.0.2-5ubuntu1 | focal/universe | source python-pip | 20.0.2-5ubuntu1 | groovy/universe | source ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579181 Title: "pip3 list --outdated" raises TypeError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pip/+bug/1579181/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1833229] Re: `--extra-index-url` not working for PIP
The fix was included in pip 20.0.2 brought in from Debian: python-pip | 20.0.2-5ubuntu1 | focal/universe | source python-pip | 20.0.2-5ubuntu1 | groovy/universe | source ** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833229 Title: `--extra-index-url` not working for PIP To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pip/+bug/1833229/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1874923] Re: Postfix documentation may have an error
This is not a postfix bug. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874923 Title: Postfix documentation may have an error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1874923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1872288] Re: Focal Fossa: postfix configure-instance script typos
This is fixed in the Debian postfix git repository, but not uploaded yet. Please use this approach vice what's in the patch. https://salsa.debian.org/postfix-team/postfix- dev/-/commit/b8e0b846e34eeaaa2315ead2304824b21b01fe7a -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872288 Title: Focal Fossa: postfix configure-instance script typos To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1872288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr
On Thursday, March 26, 2020 5:31:05 PM EDT you wrote: > On 2020-03-26 3:54 p.m., Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Does applying this change help: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/postfix-team/postfix-dev/-/commit/ > > b8e0b846e34eeaaa2315ead2304824b21b01fe7a > > Does not help. > > Sion OK. That's the only even tangentially relevant difference between Debian 10 where it works and Ubuntu F where it doesn't. I've got no further ideas. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868955 Title: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1868955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr
There are some differences between stable and what was in unstable that Ubuntu synced. Does applying this change help: https://salsa.debian.org/postfix-team/postfix-dev/-/commit/ b8e0b846e34eeaaa2315ead2304824b21b01fe7a Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868955 Title: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1868955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr
On Thursday, March 26, 2020 12:22:20 PM EDT you wrote: > Comparing strace between Ubuntu and Debian (lxc launch images:debian/10) > showed that Debian's version doesn't try to connect to the tlsmgr socket > for some reason. > > Ubuntu 3.4.10-1: ... > Debian 3.4.8-0+10debu1: ... If you use buster-proposed-updates you can get 3.4.10 for Debian 10. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868955 Title: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1868955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1868955] Re: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr
I don't recall seeing this issue in Debian, so I don't have any particular suggestions. Since the postfix is identical, I'd be inclined to look elsewhere. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868955 Title: after upgrade to 20.04: posttls cannot connect to private/tlsmgr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1868955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 861645] Re: Apport retracer dupes bugs that aren't dupes
On Friday, March 6, 2020 2:49:21 AM EST you wrote: > I'm so sorry this issue went unanswered for 9 years.. The backlog we've > accrued here is truly unfortunate. We'd really like to see the situation > improve, but with nearly 1300 open bugs, manually testing each has > become virtually impossible. The aim in pinging neglected bugs such as > this was to allow those still effected to get their issue back on the > radar. Don't worry about it. I was a very active Ubuntu developer at one point, so I totally understand. I was just in a bad mood yesterday for other reasons. On the off chance you manage to remember, if you notice any of these filed by me in the future, feel free to close them without the ping. If you don't notice, that's fine too. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861645 Title: Apport retracer dupes bugs that aren't dupes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/861645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 861645] Re: Apport retracer dupes bugs that aren't dupes
9 years later. Lovely. I don't even use Ubuntu anymore. ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861645 Title: Apport retracer dupes bugs that aren't dupes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/861645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1860315] Re: Default installation should be Local Only
On Thursday, January 30, 2020 12:52:00 AM EST you wrote: > Thanks Scott. Sincere questions: do you have any evidence users > appreciate the current default? I'm asking myself what is the use case > in which a user wants postfix to be installed, listening on all > interfaces and yet.. unconfigured? > > And thanks Robie. Yeah, I honestly had no idea that the option would > have caused mail loss the moment the package got installed. I normally > don't worry too much about debconf options, because I know I can change > them later, and trust the maintainer to set a default that won't hurt. > This is one of those few cases where it isn't safe. It's impossible to know, but I think the case for changing a long-term default needs to be stronger than "I wasn't paying attention when I installed the package and it caused problems". That may sound harsh, but that's how it comes across to me. No configuration is an option. If I am understanding correctly, all you had to do was select it. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860315 Title: Default installation should be Local Only To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1860315/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1860315] Re: Default installation should be Local Only
On Monday, January 27, 2020 5:05:06 AM EST you wrote: > Hi kiko, > > > I have a highly customized set up, with vhosts, ldap, etc, and I > > installed the package first to be able to configure it, and immediately > after installed I started dropping email. > > Clearly this was surprising to you. I would expect (knowing the > behaviour) that in your situation "No configuration" would be > appropriate choice, followed by manual or automatic configuration and > service enablement. > > Is the problem here perhaps instead that the "Internet Site" choice > wasn't clear that it would enable SMTP on all interfaces after automatic > configuration, rather than asking you further first? > > I'm on the fence about changing the default FWIW, so I wonder if we can > address this without changing it. The current default for postfix has been there approximately forever. I don't intend to change it in Debian, so if you take it up in Ubuntu, you'd have to maintain the diff. While I understand the theory of the bug, I think that changing a long standing default would also be very surprising to many users and should generally be avoided. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860315 Title: Default installation should be Local Only To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1860315/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1845334] Re: Update DEP8 test to python3
On Friday, November 1, 2019 8:59:55 AM EDT you wrote: > I have a pass with python3 for 3.4.7-1 in debian/sid. Let me clean that > branch up now and make a MR in salsa. > > ** Attachment added: "log" > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1845334/+attachment/ > 5302040/+files/log Thanks. A patch in the BTS is fine too, whichever is easier for you. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845334 Title: Update DEP8 test to python3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1845334/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1845334] Re: Update DEP8 test to python3
Any word on this? It'd be nice to get it done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845334 Title: Update DEP8 test to python3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1845334/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728723] Re: postfix check warns about symlink being group writable
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728723 Title: postfix check warns about symlink being group writable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1728723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1834511] Re: policyd-spf crashes on UnicodeEncodeError
That's correct. It was fixed in 2.0.0, but I'm not sure the fix would directly apply to 1.3.2. I've targeted the bug appropriately for 16.04. Perhaps someone involved in Ubuntu development will take a look. ** Also affects: pypolicyd-spf (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: pypolicyd-spf (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: pypolicyd-spf (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: pypolicyd-spf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834511 Title: policyd-spf crashes on UnicodeEncodeError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pypolicyd-spf/+bug/1834511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1826908] Re: postfix 3.1.0: postinst contains broken tests
That's got it properly triaged. I only work on postfix in Debian, so I can't say if this will be fixed or not in Ubuntu. ** Also affects: postfix (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #842948 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842948 ** Also affects: postfix (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842948 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1826908 Title: postfix 3.1.0: postinst contains broken tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1826908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1826534] [NEW] Pix workaround should be (partially?) disabled when DANE is in use
This is something that you should address with upstream (postfix-users mailing list is the best venue). Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1826534 Title: Pix workaround should be (partially?) disabled when DANE is in use To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1826534/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791853] Re: Postfix upgrade queries about replacing /etc/postfix/makedefs.out, when it really should always do so
No idea why the remote bug status isn't updating, but this is fixed in Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791853 Title: Postfix upgrade queries about replacing /etc/postfix/makedefs.out, when it really should always do so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1791853/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1817363] Re: postfix-policyd-spf-python always appends as recepient address
This is not a bug, but an intentional design change to, by default, better protect user privacy. See man 5 policyd-spf.conf for details. To restore the previous behaviour, add this to the policy server's configuration: Hide_Receiver = No ** Changed in: pypolicyd-spf (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817363 Title: postfix-policyd-spf-python always appends as recepient address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pypolicyd-spf/+bug/1817363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1812571] [NEW] postfix-dbgsym package has empty .debug files; debian/rules dh_strip confusion
This is fixed in 3.3.2-1, which is in disco. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812571 Title: postfix-dbgsym package has empty .debug files; debian/rules dh_strip confusion To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1812571/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1153064] Re: Quassel IRC client has a 2 pixel window start position creep
It turns out this was a Qt bug. ** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1153064 Title: Quassel IRC client has a 2 pixel window start position creep To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quassel/+bug/1153064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 833751] Re: error in English string
** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833751 Title: error in English string To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quassel/+bug/833751/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1787584] Re: segfault on messages without RFC5322.From header
** Also affects: opendmarc (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: opendmarc (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: opendmarc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787584 Title: segfault on messages without RFC5322.From header To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendmarc/+bug/1787584/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553928] Re: postfix-pgsql SSL connection to postgres
This is fixed in 3.3. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553928 Title: postfix-pgsql SSL connection to postgres To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1553928/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes
FYI, this is fixed in 3.3.1 upstream, so when that lands, this diff can be dropped. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753470 Title: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1753470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1777085] Re: package clamtk 5.25-1 failed to install/upgrade: poging tot overschrijven van '/usr/share/Thunar/sendto/thunar-sendto-clamtk.desktop', wat ook in pakket thunar-sendto-clamtk 0.06-1 z
Fixed for the next upload in Debian that will, in due course, make its way to Ubuntu. ** Changed in: clamtk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: clamtk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: clamtk (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Scott Kitterman (kitterman) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777085 Title: package clamtk 5.25-1 failed to install/upgrade: poging tot overschrijven van '/usr/share/Thunar/sendto/thunar-sendto- clamtk.desktop', wat ook in pakket thunar-sendto-clamtk 0.06-1 zit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamtk/+bug/1777085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1791853] Re: Postfix upgrade queries about replacing /etc/postfix/makedefs.out, when it really should always do so
On Monday, September 17, 2018 06:10:30 AM you wrote: > This isn't sometihng we'd want to take a Delta in Ubuntu for IMHO, so > I'm waiting if my Debian submission will be accepted. I expect I'll apply the change, but am severely lacking in time right now. It would help if you could submit a merge request on salsa.d.o [1]. Thanks, Scott K [1] https://salsa.debian.org/postfix-team/postfix-dev -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791853 Title: Postfix upgrade queries about replacing /etc/postfix/makedefs.out, when it really should always do so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1791853/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1782416] Re: Python3 Compat Problem: "Cannot use a bytes pattern on a string-like object"
I'm open to changes for type hinting. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782416 Title: Python3 Compat Problem: "Cannot use a bytes pattern on a string-like object" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dkimpy/+bug/1782416/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1782416] Re: Python3 Compat Problem: "Cannot use a bytes pattern on a string-like object"
This is true pretty much throughout dkimpy when used with python3. It's not particularly feasible to change it. I'm open to suggestions on improved documentation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782416 Title: Python3 Compat Problem: "Cannot use a bytes pattern on a string-like object" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dkimpy/+bug/1782416/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1782416] Re: Python3 Compat Problem: "Cannot use a bytes pattern on a string-like object"
If you feed it bytes, it works fine: >>> print(message) b'Authentication-Results: lists.example.org; arc=none; spf=pass smtp.mfrom=jqd@d1.example; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@d1.example; dmarc=pass\nReceived: from localhost\nMessage-ID: \nDate: Mon, 01 Jan 2011 01:02:03 +0400\nFrom: Test User \nTo: someb...@example.com\nSubject: Testing\n\nThis is a test message.\n' >>> sig = dkim.dkim_sign(message, b"test", b"example.com", key) ** Changed in: dkimpy Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: dkimpy (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782416 Title: Python3 Compat Problem: "Cannot use a bytes pattern on a string-like object" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dkimpy/+bug/1782416/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773200] Re: package postfix (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new postfix package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
It looks more like a debconf issue to me: Preparing to unpack .../1-postfix_3.3.0-1_amd64.deb ... Gtk-[1;32mMessage[0m: [34m20:19:38.211[0m: GtkDialog mapped without a transient parent. This is discouraged. Use of uninitialized value $ret in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 132, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 133, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret[0] in string eq at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 134, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 132, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 133, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret[0] in string eq at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 134, line 5. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 55, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 132, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 133, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret[0] in string eq at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 134, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $mailertype in string eq at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 57, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 132, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 133, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret[0] in string eq at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 134, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 132, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 133, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret[0] in string eq at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 134, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 132, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 133, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret[0] in string eq at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 134, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $mailertype in string eq at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 67, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $mailertype in string eq at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 67, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $mailertype in string eq at /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/config line 67, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 132, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 133, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret[0] in string eq at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 134, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 132, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret in split at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 133, line 5. Use of uninitialized value $ret[0] in string eq at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm line 134, line 5. dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-0R1mHg/1-postfix_3.3.0-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): new postfix package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 ** Package changed: postfix (Ubuntu) => debconf (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773200 Title: package postfix (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new postfix package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debconf/+bug/1773200/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes
** Package changed: update (Ubuntu) => postfix (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753470 Title: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1753470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes
On Monday, May 07, 2018 08:56:52 PM you wrote: > Thanks Scott, I did email postfix-users with subject "NULL pointer deref > in pcf_check_dbms_client() with unreadable map file", but I'm not > subscribed. Checking the archive at https://marc.info/?l=postfix-> > users=1=201805=2 doesn't show my message, so I guess I should > subscribe. Or perhaps it's just held up for moderation? I think you need to be subscribed. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753470 Title: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1753470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes
On Monday, May 07, 2018 03:43:26 PM you wrote: > I think the only contact to the developers is their postfix-devel > mailing list here: > > http://www.postfix.org/lists.html postfix-devel is generally for developers of postfix. Users should use postfix-users (even for code issues like this). The postfix developers are active on postfix-users. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753470 Title: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1753470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes
On Monday, May 07, 2018 04:47:07 PM you wrote: > And this is new in 3.3.0. I was also looking for some git/svn/bzr/cvs > repository to check the history of these changes, but couldn't find it. This is maintained by one of the primary postfix developers: https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix It's the best you'll find publicly. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753470 Title: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1753470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1753470] Re: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes
On Monday, May 07, 2018 03:14:56 PM you wrote: > vstream_fopen() did return 0 and errno was set to EACCES, I don't know > why that check is excluding the permission problem. I emailed upstream > (couldn't find a bugtracker for it). There is no postfix bugtracker upstream. Did you mail the postfix-users mailing list? I don't recall seeing this. That's the normal venue for reporting issues. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753470 Title: Postconf segfaults every 5 minutes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1753470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1769393] Re: package postfix-doc 3.3.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: installed postfix-doc package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1
This only happens if you've manually deleted /etc/postfix/main.cf but left the postfix package installed. This is not a supported configuration. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769393 Title: package postfix-doc 3.3.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: installed postfix-doc package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1769393/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1767539] Re: Security fixes from 0.12.5 require backfit to earlier releases
On Wednesday, May 02, 2018 07:27:36 AM you wrote: > Thanks Scott. I've gone ahead and built this package in the > https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/ ; > given the large amount of code around the introduced deserializer, I'd > like to see a successful test report before publishing to trusty- > security. I'm running a patched version now. The same patch has been released by Debian. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767539 Title: Security fixes from 0.12.5 require backfit to earlier releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quassel/+bug/1767539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767539] Re: Security fixes from 0.12.5 require backfit to earlier releases
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #896914 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896914 ** Also affects: quassel (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896914 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767539 Title: Security fixes from 0.12.5 require backfit to earlier releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quassel/+bug/1767539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767539] [NEW] Security fixes from 0.12.5 require backfit to earlier releases
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: A recent upstream release contains two security fixes. All supported Ubuntu releases are affected. * SECURITY UPDATE: quasselcore, corruption of heap metadata caused by qdatastream - debian/patches/Implement_custom_deserializer.patch: Original patch from upstream 0.12.5 release, adapted for non-C++ 11 systems by Felix Geyer - CVE requested by upstream * SECURITY UPDATE: quasselcore, denial of service for unconfigure core - debian/patches/Reject_clients_that_attempt_to_login_before_the_core_is _configured.patch: Original patch from upstream 0.12.5 release, adapted for non-C++ 11 systems by Felix Geyer - CVE requested by upstream I'll be attaching a debdiff for Trusty, but not later releases as that is the only Ubuntu release I still have an interest in. Note that the debian/changelog doesn't have the LP bug number in it since I haven't filed it yet. The trusty fix is based on the Debian patches for Jessie (Debian 8): https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde-extras/quassel/tree/jessie I'm running the fixed version now. ** Affects: quassel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: quassel (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Affects: quassel (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: quassel (Ubuntu Artful) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: quassel (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: quassel (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: patch ** Patch added: "Trusty fix" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767539/+attachment/5129007/+files/quassel.security.debdiff ** Also affects: quassel (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: quassel (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: quassel (Ubuntu Artful) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: quassel (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Confirmed => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767539 Title: Security fixes from 0.12.5 require backfit to earlier releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quassel/+bug/1767539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657350] Re: Crash in ubi-console-setup.py during install
I'm not using Kubuntu anymore anyway. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657350 Title: Crash in ubi-console-setup.py during install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/657350/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 628894] Re: Manual partition problem alert when there isn't an actual problem
Not using Kubuntu anymore anyway. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to ubiquity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628894 Title: Manual partition problem alert when there isn't an actual problem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/628894/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1694843] Re: opendmarc ignores configuration
This was fixed in 1.3.2-3. ** Changed in: opendmarc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694843 Title: opendmarc ignores configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendmarc/+bug/1694843/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1748726] Re: postfix incorrectly depends on e2fsprogs
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748726 Title: postfix incorrectly depends on e2fsprogs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1748726/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1238559] Re: Exception causes next transaction to abort
Did you ever get this figured out? ** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238559 Title: Exception causes next transaction to abort To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psycopg2/+bug/1238559/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 650777] Re: operator does not exist: text = bytea
Presumably this is resolved by now. Please set back to new if not. ** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650777 Title: operator does not exist: text = bytea To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psycopg2/+bug/650777/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1304138] Re: Backport 2.5 bugfixes
** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304138 Title: Backport 2.5 bugfixes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psycopg2/+bug/1304138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1218727] Re: package clamav-base 0.97.8+dfsg-1ubuntu1.12.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Fix in Debian packaging git repository for the next upload to Debian. Once that's uploaded, Ubuntu can update from that to get the fix. ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218727 Title: package clamav-base 0.97.8+dfsg-1ubuntu1.12.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1218727/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1684037] Re: Wrong systemd dependencies prevent postfix from starting
I agree it's not a duplicate. I've seen this in Debian as well and haven't solved it their either. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1531299 postfix upgrade can fail due to "newaliases: fatal: inet_addr_local[getifaddrs]: getifaddrs: Address family not supported by protocol" under qemu-static ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1684037 Title: Wrong systemd dependencies prevent postfix from starting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1684037/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1709504] [NEW] Postfix Files that shouldn't be writable.
It was fixed in Debian later, but it's harmless. Because these are symlinks (which the script doesn't follow), the permissions it detects aren't the actual permissions. The 'fix' is not to emit the warnings for this. You can ignore them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709504 Title: Postfix Files that shouldn't be writable. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1709504/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885852] Re: package python-psycopg2 2.2.1-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus nouveau script pre-removal a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
Bug in obsolete python helper: File "/usr/share/pycentral-data/pyversions.py", line 172, in default_version ** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885852 Title: package python-psycopg2 2.2.1-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus nouveau script pre-removal a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psycopg2/+bug/885852/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 848566] Re: package python-psycopg2 2.2.1-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Bug in obsolete python helper (pycentral). ** Changed in: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848566 Title: package python-psycopg2 2.2.1-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psycopg2/+bug/848566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1650064] Re: package python-psycopg2 2.6.1-1build2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Package changed: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) => egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650064 Title: package python-psycopg2 2.6.1-1build2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/egenix-mx-base/+bug/1650064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1700964] Re: package python-psycopg2 2.6.1-1build2 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script pre-removal instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 1
** Package changed: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) => python-defaults (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700964 Title: package python-psycopg2 2.6.1-1build2 failed to install/upgrade: sub- processo script pre-removal instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-defaults/+bug/1700964/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1706480] Re: package postfix 3.1.0-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75
>From the terminal log: newaliases: fatal: file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter mail_owner: user postfix has same user ID as pulse This is a local configuration issue and not a package bug. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706480 Title: package postfix 3.1.0-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1706480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1695758] Re: package python-prompt-toolkit 1.0.9-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pycompile", line 35, in from debpython.version import SUPPORTED, debsorted, vrepr, \ File "/usr/share/python/debpython/version.py", line 24, in from ConfigParser import SafeConfigParser ImportError: No module named 'ConfigParser' ** Package changed: prompt-toolkit (Ubuntu) => python3-defaults (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695758 Title: package python-prompt-toolkit 1.0.9-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/1695758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1591706] Re: postfix is vulnerable to "Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation" DoS according to testssl
Based on the report against the test tool, unless this issue is validated with the current version of the tool released in May 2017, it's a false positive. It's not clear there's any kind of bug at all. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical => Undecided ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591706 Title: postfix is vulnerable to "Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation" DoS according to testssl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1591706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1519331] Re: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop
On Monday, May 15, 2017 08:49:42 PM you wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:45:21PM -0000, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I'm getting close to uploading a fix for this to Debian, so you might wait > > for that. > > It looks like you've implemented this using the network-online.target > approach, which as you mentioned might not DTRT for the localhost-only use > case. Did you decide that this is negligible? That was the advice I got from the Debian systemd maintainers (that the impact would be negligible). > For the case of a server which always has a network connection, this works > fine. For the case of a standalone system with no configured network > connection, it probably also works fine. But for the case of e.g. a laptop > that sometimes has network and sometimes doesn't, if the system comes up > without network, postfix will not start and you will not have local > delivery. Is this the behavior you expect with your change? I tested this and if you're using NetworkManager at least there's some magic that happens which causes systemd to restart postfix once the network is available. Part of the reason I was having so much trouble replicating problems others were seeing was getting NM to quit 'helping' as the test system I was using also has a desktop installed. > Ultimately I want to SRU this into affected stable Ubuntu releases, so would > want a regression-free change. > > I see you are also setting After=nss-lookup.target. For the bug reported > here - which is about DNS resolution specifically - would it not suffice to > have postfix declare this After=nss-lookup.target, and for systemd-resolved > to be sequenced before it? According to the Debian systemd people, the systemd-resolved is superfluous. It's nss-lookup.target that I wanted all along. There's a very helpful (at least for me) discussion in the last few entries in the Debian bug. Reviewing that would be better advice than I have for what's safe/not as I cribbed from Michael Biebl's suggestions after just enough research to be able to convince myself I wasn't cargo culting. Scott K -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519331 Title: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1519331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1519331] Re: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop
I'm getting close to uploading a fix for this to Debian, so you might wait for that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519331 Title: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1519331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318324] Re: Python-Bleach in trusty is broken
Still an issue in Trusty, but fixed in the current release. ** Also affects: python-bleach (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: python-bleach (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: python-bleach (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318324 Title: Python-Bleach in trusty is broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-bleach/+bug/1318324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
