What is the bug that you're hitting in 0.4.1?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to suds in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327202
Title:
python-suds 0.4.1 is a beta version, and should not have been packaged
To
Public bug reported:
The 04-merge-schema.patch that was introduced in Debian in 0.4.1-10
causes a regression in the handling of namespaces. As a result of this,
applications such as mhgui (part of congruity package) are broken. In
Debian, the patch was reverted in 0.4.1-13 per Debian bug:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1314674 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314674
Looks like this is being handled in bug #1314674.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1314674
Unable to connect to VCenter 5.5 VimFaultException: Server raised fault:
'Element tag
I ran into this bug (the namespace handling regression in Suds) in a
different way (congruity package is also broken by this). However, I
verified that the python-suds in trusty-proposed resolves the issue in
congruity.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Now that Adobe has officially released Flash Player 10 (with Linux WMODE
support), would it be possible to get it released for Hardy?
Thanks,
Scott
--
[MASTER] Adobe Flash does not support WMODE (Flash content always rendered on
top of web pages)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49613
You
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: kernel-image-2.6.24-18-generic-di
This bug is concerning the support for the Adaptec 2100S RAID controller
under Ubuntu 8.06 with the x86_64 kernel. This controller is DPT I2O-
based, so there are two possible Linux kernel drivers, i2o_block and
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-nv
This problem occurs in Ubuntu 8.06 using the open source nv xorg driver.
Basically the lower half of the screen flashes (it's hard to describe
exactly - see the attachment for a video) while this driver is in use
with an nVidia
** Attachment added: p6060002.mov
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15164831/p6060002.mov
--
Screen flashing with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 using xorg driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238741
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Ooops, I meant Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy).
--
Screen flashing with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 using xorg driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238741
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Oops, I meant Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy).
--
Adaptec 2100S RAID (DPT I2O-based) controller poorly supported under x86_64
kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238735
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
I am just seeing this bug now as well. Does anyone know how to get my
contacts back? They still appear to exist in
~/.evolution/addressbook/local/system/addressbook.db.
--
evolution contacts are lost on upgrade to [8.10] RC
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289686
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree
Adobe released version 10.0.22.87 of the Flash Player Plugin today.
This means that the checksum of the install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz
has changed and thus flashplugin-nonfree is currently un-installable -
the install fails with
Attached is a debdiff that I believe resolves the issue. It worked OK
for me.
** Attachment added: flashplugin-nonfree_10.0.22.87ubuntu1~intrepid1.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23092134/flashplugin-nonfree_10.0.22.87ubuntu1%7Eintrepid1.debdiff
--
flashplugin-nonfree update needed
It appears this update includes security fixes as well:
http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-01.html
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2009-0520
--
flashplugin-nonfree update needed due to upstream change
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334134
** This bug has been flagged as a security issue
--
flashplugin-nonfree update needed due to upstream change
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334134
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Adobe just released a new version to correct some security issues. New
packages will be out soon to update the md5sums. Please see this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334134.
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install due to md5sum mismatch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
You
I tested this with the Jaunty Alpha 6 live CD. The flashing issue still
exists for me. Attached is my X.org log file, if that will shed any
light on the issue.
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24351952/Xorg.0.log
--
Screen flashing with GeForce 6150SE nForce
Actually, this bug appears to be caused by X picking a vertical refresh
rate that is outside the range of my monitor (NEC LCD 1700V). I tried
using a different monitor and the issue goes away.
--
Screen flashing with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 using xorg driver
** Summary changed:
- Screen flashing with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 using xorg driver
+ Xorg nv Driver uses wrong sync frequencies with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
--
Xorg nv Driver uses wrong sync frequencies with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238741
You received
X is using a Modeline which should result in a 64.0 kHz / 60.0 Hz
refresh rate. However, the monitor reports that the refresh rate is
actually 59.2 kHz / 55.5 Hz. When I use the nvidia proprietary driver,
X uses the same Modeline; however, the monitor is actually driven at
64.0 kHz / 60.0 Hz.
I
This sounds like another instance (different PCI ID, same symptoms) of
bug # 238741.
--
[intrepid] can't drive widescreen flat planel at EDID-supplied mode with
GeForce 6100
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311976
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Przemysław,
I'm not sure if what you're seeing is the same issue. The issue that
Wirawan and I have seen appears to be related to leaving Firefox open
with Best Buy's website (http://www.bestbuy.com/) loaded. In this case,
it will eventually consume all of the available memory.
--
Firefox 3
Yes, I would recommend filing a separate bug.
Scott
--
Firefox 3 memory use explodes by itself randomly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hi Wirawan,
I recently ran across a similar problem in Intrepid. If I left Firefox
running, it would eventually consume all of my memory and cause lots of
problems. I spent a considerable amount of investigating this, and I
recently determined that it was actually caused by leaving Firefox open
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #473898
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473898
** Also affects: firefox via
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473898
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Here's my lspci output.
** Attachment added: lspci.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21066224/lspci.txt
--
Screen flashing with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 using xorg driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238741
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I was able to recover my contacts. I discovered that the old (Hardy-
era) addressbook.db appeared to be using Berkeley DB version 7, while
the current version of Evolution appeared to be using version 9. I
installed the db4.6-util package and then did:
evolution --force-shutdown
cd
This issue does not occur for me when using the nouveau driver in Karmic
(it does, however, still occur when using the nv driver in Karmic).
--
Xorg nv Driver uses wrong sync frequencies with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238741
You received this bug notification
Yes, the patch would resolve the issue for the -nv driver. Not sure it
is worth the effort though, since you're moving to -nouveau in Lucid.
--
Xorg nv Driver uses wrong sync frequencies with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238741
You received this bug notification
This issue still exists (for me) on Ubuntu 8.10 Alpha 5, using the Live
CD.
--
Screen flashing with GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 using xorg driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238741
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Hi Leann,
I tested the dpt_i2o driver with the 64-bit version of Intrepid Alpha 5.
Unfortunately, it didn't quite work. It was able to see my controller,
but it wasn't able to correctly create the SCSI device(s), e.g. /dev/sdb1.
The 32-bit version of Alpha 5 worked OK. I guess the kernel
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
I'd really like to get this fix applied before Beta-2 for Precise. If I
could just get test confirmation with the kernel from comment #71, that
would be great. Thanks.
Leann,
I'll try to test it this weekend.
--
You received this bug
Leann, the kernel mentioned in comment #71 seems to perform about the
same as the drm-next one. xrandr operations take about 170ms on my
hardware. So it would seem you have successfully applied the patch. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I sat staring at this code for a long time, scratching my head as to how the
patched code could behave differently. Finally, after a bit of Googling, the
problem is pretty apparent now. The problem is that an unsigned integer is
being initialized with a negative number. Thus, the test
Kernel 7 posted. I think this should be the last one. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display problem (thin fading white vertical lines) after kernel
upgrade to
I lied, it looks like there is one more to test. I'll build it shortly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display problem (thin fading white vertical lines) after kernel
Okay, kernel #8 is ready...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display problem (thin fading white vertical lines) after kernel
upgrade to 3.0.0.15, no login window
To
Okay, it looks like 7364b6846869128f98050a16213580195edffbba is the
first bad commit:
commit 7364b6846869128f98050a16213580195edffbba
Author: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
Date: Mon Sep 26 16:09:45 2011 -0700
drm/i915: Allow SSC parameter to override VBT value
BugLink:
Just to be 100% sure, I just built a kernel (#9) with just the above
commit reverted. Can you give it a try?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display problem (thin
Okay, I'll try to flag down a Ubuntu kernel developer.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display problem (thin fading white vertical lines) after kernel
upgrade to
@Seth,
It looks like this fix has caused a regression for at least one user,
please see bug #925350.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614238
Title:
Intel Core i3 External Monitor Wavy
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-
oneiric.git;a=commit;h=7364b6846869128f98050a16213580195edffbba
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I did a bisection as well - I can confirm
e9925217e61dd3594f81b415f2b7e077426f208f is the guilty commit.
Question - I was doing a fakeroot debian/rules clean between each
build. Is this a necessary step, or can the build environment properly
handle partial builds?
--
You received this bug
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
There is a new test kernel available at:
http://people.canonical.com/~jsalisbury/lp919350/
Can folks affected by this bug test this kernel and report back?
This is a kernel bisect between 3.0.0-14.23 and 3.0.0-15.24. The kernel was
built up to
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, captnbli wrote:
Sorry, not having a good day. I see that the fix is in .17, so I need to
see how to get that version. Cheers, Pete M
I don't think it has been released yet. In the mean time, you can
probably keep using 3.0.0-14, or you can temporarily use the packages
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, wild_oscar wrote:
I updated to linux-image-3.0.0-16-generic but the issue is still here:
the image after the grub is the one I posted on my previous comment and
not the login window.
You might be experiencing a different bug. What type of video hardware do
you have?
--
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, wild_oscar wrote:
@Scott:
product: Mobile 915GM/PM/GMS/910GML Express Processor to DRAM Controller
Like I said, it works perfectly in kernel 3.0.0.14.
Should we open a new bug report?
Yes, I'd recommend a new bug report. Do you know how to bisect a kernel?
If not, I'd
Hi, I posted a first set of test kernel packages at the address below. Please
give them a try and let me know the results.
http://www.techie.net/~talbert/925350/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Good point, I'm not sure my patch would resolve the problem in your
situation as well. I'll have to see if I can rework it to help in that
case as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@wild_oscar,
Yes, my bad. I didn't ask you whether you were using a 32-bit or 64-bit
system. I'll recompile for 32-bit.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display
The linux-image is the actual linux kernel binary package. The other
two packages contain kernel header files - I think they are used mainly
if you have any kernel modules that get compiled automatically upon
kernel installation. Yes, I believe you do need to install them all
(linux-image
i386 packages posted. Please give them a try.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display problem (thin fading white vertical lines) after kernel
upgrade to 3.0.0.15, no
Unfortunately, we don't yet know which commit caused the problem. There
are about half a dozen more kernels to try before we will be able to
identify the problem. The next one is compiling right now. I'll let
you know when it is ready.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Next set of test kernels are posted. Same address as above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display problem (thin fading white vertical lines) after kernel
upgrade to
Okay, still a few more to test. Next round of kernels posted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display problem (thin fading white vertical lines) after kernel
upgrade
Okay, next kernel posted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display problem (thin fading white vertical lines) after kernel
upgrade to 3.0.0.15, no login window
To
Okay, next kernel posted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display problem (thin fading white vertical lines) after kernel
upgrade to 3.0.0.15, no login window
To
Kernel 6 posted. Git is telling me that there should be only 1 or 2
more after this. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925350
Title:
Display problem (thin fading white vertical
For me, under kernel 3.0.0-16-generic, running xrandr takes ~1.4 seconds
and it appears to stall my system while running. With 3.3.0-996-generic
#201202170408 from the drm-next area above, running xrandr takes ~170ms
and doesn't cause my system to stall (at least noticeably). So for me,
it
@sjardine:
You probably need to recompile the interceptor as a 32-bit executable.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571247
Title:
acroread remains zombie, so pdfs won't be rendered
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 740126 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740126
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 740126
Disabling an output can cause vblank events to be missed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 796162 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796162
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 796162
Flash 10.3.181.22 flickers in Firefox 4 but not in Chromium (64bit)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 796162 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796162
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 796162
Flash 10.3.181.22 flickers in Firefox 4 but not in Chromium (64bit)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 796162 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796162
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 796162
Flash 10.3.181.22 flickers in Firefox 4 but not in Chromium (64bit)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Jeff Davis wrote:
The only thing that has worked for me: killall -KILL npviewer.bin, then
refresh the browser page.
Adobe? Bueller? Bueller?
I did report the problem to Adobe. No response as of yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
Adobe Flash Player 11 has now been officially released. It now has
native 64-bit support so that nspluginwrapper shouldn't be required for
64-bit installations.
** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Andreas E. wrote:
Isn't it time to get the double title bar fixed? Both Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
and Wine 1.4 claim to be stable and quality releases. Both would profit
from a fix no matter who's fault it is.
Scott Talbert said: The issue seems to occur because Unity modifies
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Omer Akram wrote:
Scott, any updates on your findings? would you be able to work on a fix,
you might want to talk to smspillaz to get an idea on how to fix this
issue.
Actually, with the versions of compiz/unity in Oneiric, I don't see the
problem anymore. The main
Okay, I was able to try this with Picasa (after I finally figured out
how to download it as Google kept telling me my OS wasn't supported).
What I am seeing with Picasa (in Oneiric with wine 1.3) is a slightly
different problem. The problem is really that the window decorations
don't get removed
Public bug reported:
I just upgraded today to 3.0.0-15.25. My system appears to boot up
normally, but when X starts, the display is blank. The backlight is on,
however. When I revert back to 3.0.0-14.23, everything works again. My
system is a Dell Latitude E6410 with Intel Graphics. I can
** Attachment added: lspci-vnvn.log
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919903/+attachment/2686853/+files/lspci-vnvn.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919903
Title:
No Video on
As suggested by Saku Ytti in a duplicate bug, this may be KMS related.
Disabling KMS (nomodeset) also fixes the problem for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919350
Title:
Laptop
As for the workaround, I'm seeing the 'available to all users' box
grayed out for some of my wireless connections. Any idea why that is?
Is this still a problem in Precise?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, David Schwarz wrote:
The display works correctly under the lp919350 kernel linked above.
Sorry for the slow turnaround.
Ditto for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Same behavior confirmed on E6410. 201201232330 build does not work.
Is there an easy way to bisect Ubuntu kernels? Seems like it could be
faster if one of us with the affected hardware could do it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
It appears that this issue affects Unity 2D as well (in Oneiric at
least). New bug or add unity-2d to this one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771562
Title:
Whitelist
Public bug reported:
I believe I am seeing GPU lockups when running Unity 3D on Oneiric with
the Nouveau driver using a GeForce 6150SE nForce 430. I'm not entirely
sure what causes them, but I can usually make them occur by repeatedly
minimizing and maximizing windows, showing/hiding the Unity
** Attachment added: Xorg.1.log
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887390/+attachment/2588999/+files/Xorg.1.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887390
Title:
GPU Lockups with Unity 3D
Still broken in 9.4.6. The issue described in the release notes sounds
like a browser freeze, whereas this issue is where acroread exits, but
nspluginwrapper/nppdf.so is still around so it prevents future PDFs from
being viewed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Also affects: unity-2d (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771562
Title:
Whitelist system-config-printer-applet
To manage
Hi WarriorIng64,
Is Unity 3D still running well for you with Oneiric on your system? The
reason I ask is that I have the same video card and a similar
motherboard, but Unity 3D is performing poorly for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, WarriorIng64 wrote:
I have not been running Unity 3D for the past week or so (switched over
to GNOME Shell on my desktop), but when I last used it everything seemed
fine performance-wise except the lenses being just slightly slow and the
Alt+Tab window switcher performing
Higgs, I suspect that there is additional work that needs to be done in
bamf in order to resolve this issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702452
Title:
[launcher] Wine applications
This occurs because Synaptic is looking for the packagename.list file
in /var/lib/dpkg/info, but for packages that are multi-arch capable, the
filename in /var/lib/dpkg/info contains a :amd64, even if that is the
native architecture of the machine. Proposed patch attached which makes
an
I think I am seeing a similar condition. I think I got into it through
running VirtualBox with a VirtualBox window maximized.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780536
Title:
Mouse
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 755406 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755406
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 755406
Mouse offset problem when using a WINE application maximized
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: unity
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: unity
Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott Talbert (swt-techie)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755406
Title
I have been looking into this bug in some detail. The issue seems to
occur because Unity modifies the MWM hints (to remove the window
decorations when Wine is maximized) and then Wine subsequently restores
them. The mouse offset problem occurs because the title bar is there,
but just not
I am seeing this also with Quicken 2000 (via Wine) when maximized.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755406
Title:
Mouse offset problem when using a WINE application maximized
--
Omer, what branch?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772612
Title:
maximized window is displaced
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I see the same problem with Intrepid. I can't un-mount sshfs with
'umount'. 'fusermount' works fine.
** Changed in: fuse (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Unmount of sshfs fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188811
You received this bug notification because you are a member
All, good news is that this specific issue appears to have been resolved
in the compiz trunk (and also in Oneiric). It appears that two commits
[1][2] are required to resolve the issue. I have prepared a patch
(attached) which includes both of these commits. Additionally, I have
prepared test
** Patch added: compiz_fix_772612.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/772612/+attachment/2264571/+files/compiz_fix_772612.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Daniel Bruckner wrote:
Scott -- so far, this patch works! Well, mostly. With Unity enabled, I
can no longer reproduce the buggy behavior. Using Ubuntu Classic,
however, I still get the same problem. But perhaps the latter deserves
its own bug report? Please advise :)
** Changed in: nspluginwrapper
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571247
Title:
acroread remains zombie, so pdfs won't be rendered anymore
To manage
Artuom, are you sure this is really 'Fix Committed?'
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796162
Title:
Flash 10.3.181.22 flickers in Firefox 4 but not in Chromium (64bit)
To manage
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Artuom wrote:
I tried Beta Flash Player 11 (64 bit) in 6 different PCs with Ubuntu
11.04 (64 bit) and didn't find any problems. And I got the same positive
results from Matt Gallagher. (I know that there were ideas that the
problem is with nspluginwrapper, I think that
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
This was SRU'd
If you can reproduce it in a way that's different from the prescribed
instructions then it's a different bug and you need to open a new
report.
Sam, it looks like you may have fixed this in a branch[1] but I don't
think those changes
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Nikolaus Filus wrote:
@Scott Talbert: You seem to have analyzed the problem - can you say, if
this should be fixed in compiz/unity or wine? I am affected by this
issue with crossover office + MS office as well as by bug 772612, where
we are still waiting
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 815958 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815958
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 815958
package flashplugin-installer 10.3.181.34ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error
exit
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
