[Bug 645808] [NEW] mail-stack-delivery wont install: preinst: 67: Syntax error: end of file unexpected

2010-09-23 Thread SevenMachines
Public bug reported: $ sudo rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb $ sudo apt-get install mail-stack-delivery Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will be installed mail-stack-delivery 0 upgraded, 1 newly

[Bug 645808] Re: mail-stack-delivery wont install: preinst: 67: Syntax error: end of file unexpected

2010-09-23 Thread SevenMachines
dovecot (1:1.2.12-1ubuntu4) maverick; urgency=low * debian/mail-stack-delivery.preinst: - Properly close switch/case statement (LP: #645808) Test-Build: https://edge.launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/release+1/+packages ** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned

[Bug 484131] Re: package ifupdown-scripts-zg2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-11-19 Thread SevenMachines
hi fabrice. dpkg-source was ignoring the deletion since the debian directory is in the original source tarball, i'm guessing this is why the bug wasnt fixed in debian as the changlelog says. the attached debdiff removes the entry from debian/ifupdown-scripts-zg2.dirs instead. it would seem a good

[Bug 483220] Re: package bld 0.3.4.1-3 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-11-19 Thread SevenMachines
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #557084 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557084 ** Also affects: bld (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557084 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- package bld 0.3.4.1-3 failed to

[Bug 485444] Re: fglrx-kernel-source does not compile: SIGIO undeclared

2009-11-19 Thread SevenMachines
the fix is to add #include linux/signal.hto /usr/src/fglrx-8.660/kcl_io.c ** Changed in: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #554401 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554401 ** Also affects: fglrx-driver (Debian) via

[Bug 485444] Re: fglrx-kernel-source does not compile: SIGIO undeclared

2009-11-19 Thread SevenMachines
fixed upstream in debian fglrx-driver (1:9-10-2) unstable; urgency=low * Implemented dkms support with our new fglrx-modules-dkms package. * Remove old fglrx-amdcccle and fglrx-kernel-src dummy packages. * Fix VERSION and UPSTREAM_VERSION in debian/rules. * Replace my old email address in

[Bug 485444] Re: fglrx-kernel-source does not compile: SIGIO undeclared

2009-11-19 Thread SevenMachines
fglrx-installer (2:8.660-0ubuntu5) lucid; urgency=low * Add 05-fix_missing_signal_include.diff, which lets fglrx compile against Linux 2.6.32-rc5. Thanks to Stefan Bühler for his patch. Fixed in debian fglrx-driver (1:9-10-2) (LP: #485444) -- SevenMachines sevenmachi...@yahoo.co.uk

[Bug 484131] Re: package ifupdown-scripts-zg2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-11-20 Thread SevenMachines
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #557198 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557198 ** Changed in: ifupdown-scripts-zg2 (Debian) Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #530640 = Debian Bug tracker #557198 -- package ifupdown-scripts-zg2 (not installed) failed to

[Bug 483220] Re: package bld 0.3.4.1-3 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-11-20 Thread SevenMachines
hi fabrice, i mentioned this to the debian maintainer and he's made the changes in the attached diff (same as before but chown -R) to bld 0.3.4.1-4 in debian universe. bld (0.3.4.1-4) unstable; urgency=low . [ SevenMachines ] * debian/bld.postinst: drop creation and ownership changes

[Bug 484131] Re: package ifupdown-scripts-zg2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-11-22 Thread SevenMachines
https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/release/+packages ** Attachment added: ifupdown-scripts-zg2_0.3-4ubuntu0.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35941953/ifupdown-scripts-zg2_0.3-4ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- package ifupdown-scripts-zg2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade

[Bug 483220] Re: package bld 0.3.4.1-3 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-11-22 Thread SevenMachines
changelog: karmic-karmic-proposed ** Attachment added: bld_0.3.4.1-3ubuntu0.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35942133/bld_0.3.4.1-3ubuntu0.1.debdiff ** Attachment removed: bld_0.3.4.1-3ubuntu0.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35942078/bld_0.3.4.1-3ubuntu0.1.debdiff --

[Bug 483220] Re: package bld 0.3.4.1-3 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-11-22 Thread SevenMachines
was moved to in 0.3.4.1-2 REGRESSION: The package is currently unusable and the patch affects only files specific to this package, regression potential should be minimal https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/release/+packages ** Attachment added: bld_0.3.4.1-3ubuntu0.1.debdiff http

[Bug 484131] Re: package ifupdown-scripts-zg2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-11-22 Thread SevenMachines
changelog karmic-karmic-proposed ** Attachment added: ifupdown-scripts-zg2_0.3-4ubuntu0.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35942154/ifupdown-scripts-zg2_0.3-4ubuntu0.1.debdiff ** Attachment removed: ifupdown-scripts-zg2_0.3-4ubuntu0.1.debdiff

[Bug 499508] Re: FTBFS in exult 1.2-14

2010-01-04 Thread SevenMachines
Thanks Benjamin, sorry, i thought i had already subscribed universe -- FTBFS in exult 1.2-14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 501256] Re: symbol lookup error

2010-01-05 Thread SevenMachines
problem isnt merkaartors but due to fontconfig only suggesting defoma, but failing in postinst if defoma isnt installed -- symbol lookup error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501256 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 503351] [NEW] fontconfig only suggests defoma but will fail to install in postinst if it isnt available

2010-01-05 Thread SevenMachines
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: fontconfig without defoma installed fontconfig.postinst will fail, but fontconfig only suggests defoma so its not guaranteed to be available Setting up fontconfig (2.6.0-1ubuntu12) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/fontconfig.postinst: 13: defoma-subst: not found

[Bug 503351] Re: fontconfig only suggests defoma but will fail to install in postinst if it isnt available

2010-01-05 Thread SevenMachines
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37449234/Dependencies.txt -- fontconfig only suggests defoma but will fail to install in postinst if it isnt available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 503351] Re: fontconfig only suggests defoma but will fail to install in postinst if it isnt available

2010-01-05 Thread SevenMachines
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = SevenMachines (sevenmachines) -- fontconfig only suggests defoma but will fail to install in postinst if it isnt available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503351 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 501256] Re: symbol lookup error

2010-01-05 Thread SevenMachines
i've added https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/503351, this will need to be resolved first -- symbol lookup error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501256 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 503351] Re: fontconfig only suggests defoma but will fail to install in postinst if it isnt available

2010-01-05 Thread SevenMachines
: fontconfig_2.6.0-1ubuntu13.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37449632/fontconfig_2.6.0-1ubuntu13.debdiff ** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Assignee: SevenMachines (sevenmachines) = (unassigned) -- fontconfig only suggests defoma but will fail to install in postinst if it isnt available https

[Bug 503351] Re: fontconfig only suggests defoma but will fail to install in postinst if it isnt available

2010-01-05 Thread SevenMachines
sorry, 2.8.0-2 is in debian testing so this should be a sync request -- fontconfig only suggests defoma but will fail to install in postinst if it isnt available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 492996] Re: [FTBFS] open() needs mode if O_CREAT in main.c

2009-12-05 Thread SevenMachines
** Changed in: gems (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [FTBFS] open() needs mode if O_CREAT in main.c https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 492996] Re: [FTBFS] open() needs mode if O_CREAT in main.c

2009-12-05 Thread SevenMachines
thanks alfonso, that certainly fixes it. although maybe something like S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR instead of 0600, i'm not sure what the best practice is for this -- [FTBFS] open() needs mode if O_CREAT in main.c https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492996 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 492996] Re: [FTBFS] open() needs mode if O_CREAT in main.c

2009-12-05 Thread SevenMachines
a quick look at some other packages that have fixed the problem seems that they are happy enough with the numbers so i doubt i'd lose any sleep over it either. i think bit-or flags are preferred in general though, you might want to look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CompilerFlags (FORTIFY_SOURCE

[Bug 493192] [NEW] prerm script fails, defoma-font update should no longer be used

2009-12-06 Thread SevenMachines
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ttf-vlgothic ttf-vlgothic won't uninstall due to dh_installdefoma generating a no longer used call to defoma-font update. this is now a call to defoma- font purge-all. this problem was fixed in defoma 0.11.10-3 and so a no change rebuild allows

[Bug 493192] Re: prerm script fails, defoma-font update should no longer be used

2009-12-06 Thread SevenMachines
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36500033/Dependencies.txt -- prerm script fails, defoma-font update should no longer be used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493192 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-09 Thread SevenMachines
this seems to be a problem with including png.h after setjmp.h in the code 'swigged' from pygpiv.i. Python.h is included first, and it includes setjmp.h, whereas including gpiv.h then draws in png.h, causing the error. #include Python.h //includes setjmp.h #include gpiv.h //includes png.h

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-09 Thread SevenMachines
not sure about the best way to fix this, its swig that inserts the python include into pygpiv_wrap.c -- FTBFS with gcc 4.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-09 Thread SevenMachines
well, if #define PNG_SKIP_SETJMP_CHECK is added then pngconf.h will ignore the check and assume multiple setjmp.h inclusion isn't a problem, i think this is ok in this case (probably true in a lot of cases) so if that seems reasonable we could just do that? ** Attachment added:

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-09 Thread SevenMachines
** Attachment added: pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36619017/pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Attachment removed: pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36619008/pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- FTBFS with gcc 4.4

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-09 Thread SevenMachines
** Attachment added: pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36619040/pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Attachment removed: pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36619017/pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- FTBFS with gcc 4.4

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-09 Thread SevenMachines
** Attachment added: pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36619062/pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Attachment removed: pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36619040/pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- FTBFS with gcc 4.4

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-09 Thread SevenMachines
from pngconf.h, on PNG_SKIP_SETJMP_CHECK You can bypass this test if you know that your application uses exactly the same setjmp.h that was included when libpng was built. -- FTBFS with gcc 4.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-09 Thread SevenMachines
** Attachment added: proper lucid diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36624308/pygpiv_2.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Attachment removed: pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36619062/pygpiv_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Attachment removed: proper lucid diff

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-09 Thread SevenMachines
** Attachment added: pygpiv_2.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36624322/pygpiv_2.0.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- FTBFS with gcc 4.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-09 Thread SevenMachines
. pngvonf.h fails if setjmp.h is already included, as it already is The only solution i can find is to define PNG_SKIP_SETJMP_CHECK so that pngconf ignores the check. i've included the previous debdiff for lucid in the ppa below https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/release+1/+packages -- FTBFS

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-09 Thread SevenMachines
this isnt a problem for debian unstable, libpng-dev contains the same test but builds against python 2.5 so perhaps its a result of using 2.6 in ubuntu. -- FTBFS with gcc 4.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install

2009-11-26 Thread SevenMachines
maybe better? only apply on amd64 builds, i386 doesnt have this problem so leaving it alone might be better if theres a hope of getting into sru muse (0.8.1a-6.3ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * debian/30_fix_x64_sysmalloc.dpatch: fix sysmalloc on amd64 systems debian/patches/00list.amd64:

[Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install

2009-11-27 Thread SevenMachines
builds and should not affect i386 so hopefully regression potential should be low https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/release/+packages ** Attachment added: muse_0.8.1a-6.3ubuntu0.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36151858/muse_0.8.1a-6.3ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- muse fails

[Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install

2009-11-27 Thread SevenMachines
DESCRIPTION: muse 0.8.1a-6.3 fails to start on ubuntu karmic amd64 (i386 not affected) with error $ muse muse: malloc.c:3074: sYSMALLOc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) ((av)-bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd old_size == 0) || ((unsigned

[Bug 489224] Re: qbittorrent 1.5.5-2 on lucid crashes on start with undefined symbol

2009-11-27 Thread SevenMachines
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36152147/Dependencies.txt -- qbittorrent 1.5.5-2 on lucid crashes on start with undefined symbol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489224 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 489224] [NEW] qbittorrent 1.5.5-2 on lucid crashes on start with undefined symbol

2009-11-27 Thread SevenMachines
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qbittorrent $ qbittorrent ** (unknown:1777): CRITICAL **: atk_object_set_name: assertion `name != NULL' failed qbittorrent: symbol lookup error: qbittorrent: undefined symbol: _ZN9QHashData13detach_helperEPFvPNS_4NodeEPvEPFvS1_Ei This is fixed by a

[Bug 489224] Re: qbittorrent 1.5.5-2 on lucid crashes on start with undefined symbol

2009-11-27 Thread SevenMachines
** Attachment added: qbittorrent_1.5.5-2ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36152812/qbittorrent_1.5.5-2ubuntu1.debdiff -- qbittorrent 1.5.5-2 on lucid crashes on start with undefined symbol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489224 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install

2009-11-27 Thread SevenMachines
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #558285 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558285 ** Also affects: muse (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558285 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio

[Bug 489224] Re: qbittorrent 1.5.5-2 on lucid crashes on start with undefined symbol

2009-11-27 Thread SevenMachines
i did wonder, the versioning didnt look right as i was doing it ( live and learn :*) ) i wasnt sure how long a sync would be so i though i'd mention it anyway. thanks for your work! -- qbittorrent 1.5.5-2 on lucid crashes on start with undefined symbol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489224

[Bug 490558] Re: package bld 0.3.4.1-3 faile d to install/upgrade: подпроцесс новый сценарий pre-removal возвратил код ошибки 1

2009-11-30 Thread SevenMachines
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 483220 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483220 Should be fixed in 0.3.4.1-3ubuntu1, see Bug #483220 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 483220 package bld 0.3.4.1-3 failed to install/upgrade: -- package bld 0.3.4.1-3 failed to

[Bug 501117] Re: jokosher does not open in 10.4

2009-12-29 Thread SevenMachines
** Changed in: jokosher (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- jokosher does not open in 10.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501117 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 501117] Re: jokosher does not open in 10.4

2009-12-29 Thread SevenMachines
seems not to affect debian in, Jokosher/ui/StatusBar.py, def __init__(self): there is # gtk.Statusbar contains a label inside a frame inside itself self.label = self.get_children()[0].get_children()[0] self.label.set_use_markup(True) self.get_children()[0].get_children()[0] is return a gtk.HBox

[Bug 501117] Re: jokosher does not open in 10.4

2009-12-29 Thread SevenMachines
yes, when i tested it it was the first time i'd installed it. its the same by purging, removing ~/.config/jokosher and reinstalling though too -- jokosher does not open in 10.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501117 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 501256] Re: symbol lookup error

2009-12-29 Thread SevenMachines
** Changed in: merkaartor (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- symbol lookup error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501256 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 501256] Re: symbol lookup error

2009-12-29 Thread SevenMachines
a rebuild fixes this -- symbol lookup error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501256 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 499508] Re: FTBFS in exult 1.2-14

2009-12-31 Thread SevenMachines
files/utils.h: needs #include cstdio theres a const change needed in exult.cc too, maybe some linking problems too ** Changed in: exult (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- FTBFS in exult 1.2-14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499508 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 499508] Re: FTBFS in exult 1.2-14

2009-12-31 Thread SevenMachines
fails to build on lucid, attached debdiff exult (1.2-14ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low *10_const_char.patch: fix assign from strrchr call with const argument *15_util_include.patch: files/utils.h needs to include cstdio, fixes FTBFS (LP: #499508) https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive

[Bug 499508] Re: FTBFS in exult 1.2-14

2009-12-31 Thread SevenMachines
same for debian unstable so submitting there too ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #563226 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563226 ** Also affects: exult (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563226 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown

[Bug 434142] Re: FTBFS with gcc 4.4

2009-12-31 Thread SevenMachines
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #563228 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563228 ** Also affects: pygpiv (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563228 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- FTBFS with gcc 4.4

[Bug 490791] Re: package libuim6 1:1.5.6-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: conflicting packages - not installing libuim6

2009-12-01 Thread SevenMachines
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 460280 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460280 As you seem to be using the same version as the proposed fix, if you still have this problem with the version in karmic-proposed please add comments to the original bug

[Bug 490791] Re: package libuim6 1:1.5.6-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: conflicting packages - not installing libuim6

2009-12-01 Thread SevenMachines
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 460280 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460280 This should be fixed in karmic-proposed uim (1:1.5.6-0ubuntu1.1) karmic-proposed; urgency=low * 07_fix_configure_notoverwrite_po_makefile.dpatch: patch taken from Debian to avoid having 2 uim.mo in

[Bug 486414] Re: MPlayer fails to play some files because of inconsistency detected by ld.so (due to OpenAL)

2009-12-01 Thread SevenMachines
not sure what the proper fix is but as a temporary workaround the pulseaudio backend for openal can be disabled which 'fixes' the error Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-close.c: 731: _dl_close: Assertion `map-l_init_called' failed! either in /etc/openal/alsoft.conf or per user using

[Bug 486414] Re: MPlayer fails to play some files because of inconsistency detected by ld.so (due to OpenAL)

2009-12-01 Thread SevenMachines
** Changed in: openal-soft (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- MPlayer fails to play some files because of inconsistency detected by ld.so (due to OpenAL) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 487535] Re: package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.11+dfsg-1+ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-12-01 Thread SevenMachines
this problem seems to be fixed in upstream version http://kcat.strangesoft.net/openal-releases/openal-soft-1.10.622.tar.bz2 -- package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.11+dfsg-1+ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[Bug 487535] Re: package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.11+dfsg-1+ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-12-02 Thread SevenMachines
apologies, i've no idea how that comment ended up here, it was supposed to be #486414. thanks anders -- package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.11+dfsg-1+ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[Bug 486414] Re: MPlayer fails to play some files because of inconsistency detected by ld.so (due to OpenAL)

2009-12-02 Thread SevenMachines
this problem seems to be fixed in upstream version http://kcat.strangesoft.net/openal-releases/openal-soft-1.10.622.tar.bz2 -- MPlayer fails to play some files because of inconsistency detected by ld.so (due to OpenAL) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486414 You received this bug notification

[Bug 491522] Re: package is uninstallable

2009-12-02 Thread SevenMachines
pybridge-common has a versioned dependency on python-zopeinterface (0.3). whereas python-zope.interface provides python-zopeinterface (unversioned) now. if the versioning is dropped then everything is ok. but i suppose its as well just to update the dependency to the new name python-zope.interface

[Bug 491522] Re: package is uninstallable

2009-12-02 Thread SevenMachines
pybridge (0.3.0-6.1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * debian/control: replace requirement on python-zopeinterface with python-zope.interface for pybridge-common (LP: #491522) * debian/control: update maintainer to Ubuntu Developer -- SevenMachines sevenmachi...@yahoo.co.uk Wed, 02 Dec 2009

[Bug 491522] Re: package is uninstallable

2009-12-02 Thread SevenMachines
unresolved dependency for lucid, karmic and debian unstable -- package is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491522 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 491522] Re: package is uninstallable

2009-12-02 Thread SevenMachines
https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/release+1/+packages -- package is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491522 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 491522] Re: package is uninstallable

2009-12-02 Thread SevenMachines
** Changed in: pybridge (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = SevenMachines (sevenmachines) -- package is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491522 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 491522] Re: package is uninstallable

2009-12-02 Thread SevenMachines
same problem in debian unstable so reported upstream ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #559224 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559224 ** Also affects: pybridge (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559224 Importance: Unknown Status:

[Bug 491522] Re: package is uninstallable

2009-12-02 Thread SevenMachines
** Changed in: pybridge (Ubuntu) Assignee: SevenMachines (sevenmachines) = (unassigned) -- package is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491522 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 491680] Re: nouveau build failed: drm_sysfs.c 'struct class' has no 'nodename'

2009-12-02 Thread SevenMachines
something to to with devtmpfs in 2.6.32 i think means char *(*nodename)(struct device *dev); is now char *(*devnode)(struct device *dev, mode_t *mode); i've attached a patch that makes the changes in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c. it builds and modprobe's the module fine, hopefully i havent missed

[Bug 492369] Re: gjs does not work. Error loading libmozjs.so.

2009-12-04 Thread SevenMachines
** Changed in: gjs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- gjs does not work. Error loading libmozjs.so. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 492369] Re: gjs does not work. Error loading libmozjs.so.

2009-12-04 Thread SevenMachines
not exactly sure what the solution is but $LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.1.5/ gjs will get it running (actual library path may be different depending on xulrunner version) -- gjs does not work. Error loading libmozjs.so. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492369 You received this bug

[Bug 492609] Re: potamus doesn't start

2009-12-04 Thread SevenMachines
** Changed in: potamus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- potamus doesn't start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492609 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 468238] Re: potamus assert failure: *** glibc detected *** potamus: double free or corruption (out): 0x08c243f0 ***

2009-12-04 Thread SevenMachines
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 492609 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492609 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 492609 potamus doesn't start -- potamus assert failure: *** glibc detected *** potamus: double free or corruption (out): 0x08c243f0 ***

[Bug 473096] Re: Potamus startup crash

2009-12-04 Thread SevenMachines
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 492609 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492609 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 492609 potamus doesn't start -- Potamus startup crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 492830] Re: flowcanvas failed to build from source with gcc4.4

2009-12-05 Thread SevenMachines
looks like #include stdint.h needs to be added to flowcanvas/Connection.hpp ** Changed in: flowcanvas (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- flowcanvas failed to build from source with gcc4.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492830 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 492830] Re: flowcanvas failed to build from source with gcc4.4

2009-12-05 Thread SevenMachines
your absolutely right Michael but with cstdint error: #error This file requires compiler and library support for the upcoming ISO C++ standard, C++0x. This support is currently experimental, and must be enabled with the -std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x compiler options. so i suppose its a decision

[Bug 492830] Re: flowcanvas failed to build from source with gcc4.4

2009-12-05 Thread SevenMachines
The authors svn version contains stdint.h so i guess thats the way to go -- flowcanvas failed to build from source with gcc4.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492830 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 491522] Re: package is uninstallable

2009-12-05 Thread SevenMachines
pybridge (0.3.0-5ubuntu0.1) karmic; urgency=low * debian/control: replace requirement on python-zopeinterface with python-zope.interface for pybridge-common (LP: #491522) -- SevenMachines sevenmachi...@yahoo.co.uk Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:02:09 + ** Description changed: Binary

[Bug 492738] Re: gclcvs fails to install on Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic - postinst script error trying to run register-common-lisp-implementation

2009-12-05 Thread SevenMachines
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #308365 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=308365 ** Also affects: gclcvs (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=308365 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- gclcvs fails to install on Ubuntu 9.10

[Bug 492738] Re: gclcvs fails to install on Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic - postinst script error trying to run register-common-lisp-implementation

2009-12-05 Thread SevenMachines
fixed in debian gclcvs (2.7.0-49). gclcvs should depend on common-lisp- controller. $sudo apt-get install common-lisp-controller but on lucid i still get an uninstallable package with postinst failing gclcvs.sh Installing clc as Segmentation violation: c stack ok:signalling error Unrecoverable

[Bug 491906] Re: Zekr Quran study tool loads and then promptly crashes

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #561115 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561115 ** Also affects: zekr (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561115 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Zekr Quran study tool loads and then promptly

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
** Changed in: xenner (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
no change rebuild fixes this on lucid -- Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
also works for karmic although in /etc/init.d/xenner i'm assuming # rm -f \ /var/log/netbackd.log \ /var/log/blkbackd.log \ /var/log/evtchnd.log \ /var/log/xenstore.trace \ is meant to result in this # rm -f \ # /var/log/netbackd.log \ #

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
this is quite old, heres a debdiff anyway ** Attachment added: xenner_0.41-1ubuntu6.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36786069/xenner_0.41-1ubuntu6.debdiff -- Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496654 You received this bug

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
and worth fixing https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/release+1 -- Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
xenner 0.47 seems ok. aside from a minor change in GNUmakefile from sh to bash to allow building -- Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
version to the ppa below if you're interested in trying it out https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/release/+packages -- Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496654 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
thats not a bug in the new package, its a problem with the old one. the old initscript is broken so uninstallation fails on trying to stop the daemon in the dpkg pre-removal script. in this particular case its ok to remove the prerm script before upgrading $rm /var/lib/dpkg/info/xenner.prerm

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
i'd just add that the initscript and dpkg scripts probably need a closer look in general, that would be part of upgrading the package though and not a minimal bug fix for this version -- Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496654

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
i've tested it on karmic without any problems, the rebuild corrects the library dependencies to work with the correct dynamic versions and not libxenctrl.so itself. without libxen3-dev installed there isnt any libxenctrl.so errors. have you tested the new package and are still getting them? --

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
are you sure the ppa version installed properly? $ apt-show-versions xenner xenner 0.41-1ubuntu5.1~sevenmachines1 i can reproduce the problem with xenner 0.41-1ubuntu5 from karmic main on a vanilla karmic install, and xenner 0.41-1ubuntu5.1~sevenmachines1 works as it should with no errors. so if

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
its still the old package. remember, you need to $rm /var/lib/dpkg/info/xenner.prerm before upgrading. the reason your still getting the errors is that the initscript is failing while trying to remove the old package. this causes the upgrade to fail and the old version of xenner to restart,

[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

2009-12-14 Thread SevenMachines
good stuff, if you want to test it out for a bit and see if theres any major problems that would be great. if it seems working enough i'll subscribe a motu and see about getting it into karmic -- Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library

[Bug 496901] Re: virtualbox-ose-guest-x11 wants to remove critical system files (Lucid Alpha 1)

2009-12-15 Thread SevenMachines
The problem is, virtualbox-ose-guest-x11 Provides: xserver-xorg-video-5, xserver-xorg-input-4 but in the new xorg, xserver-xorg-core Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video-5, xserver-xorg-input-4 ** Changed in: virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- virtualbox-ose-guest-x11 wants to

[Bug 496689] Re: gridengine 6.2-4 will not build under Karmic - patch in open upstream bug was never applied

2009-12-15 Thread SevenMachines
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #552833 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552833 ** Also affects: gridengine (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552833 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: gridengine (Ubuntu)

[Bug 496689] Re: gridengine 6.2-4 will not build under Karmic - patch in open upstream bug was never applied

2009-12-15 Thread SevenMachines
fixed in debian 6.2u4-2 from 6.2u4-2, 070-getline.diff ** Attachment added: 070-getline.diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36820037/070-getline.diff -- gridengine 6.2-4 will not build under Karmic - patch in open upstream bug was never applied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496689 You

[Bug 496689] Re: gridengine 6.2-4 will not build under Karmic - patch in open upstream bug was never applied

2009-12-15 Thread SevenMachines
gridengine (6.2-4ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * 070-getline.diff: fix conflicting getline declerations (LP: #496689) Fixed in debian version 6.2u4-2 ** Attachment added: gridengine_6.2-4ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36820195/gridengine_6.2-4ubuntu1.debdiff -- gridengine

[Bug 503351] Re: fontconfig only suggests defoma but will fail to install in postinst if it isnt available

2010-01-08 Thread SevenMachines
i was going to look into it but the last upload fixes this bug so if someone could close it that would be great. thanks -- fontconfig only suggests defoma but will fail to install in postinst if it isnt available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503351 You received this bug notification because

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >