Note however that gutenprint shipped already in noble on armhf, rebuilt
with 64-bit time_t. We should not introduce a library transition
between noble and oracular, for an ABI transition that happened between
jammy and noble.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Disabling SecureBoot, deleting the SBAT policy, and reenabling
SecureBoot is strictly more secure than disabling SecureBoot.
Regardless, this is resolved now.
** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
20 years ago, I promise you this was the behavior of grub on BIOS
machines running Ubuntu. As Mate says, the current behavior on UEFI is
a concession to the limitations of UEFI.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
** Package changed: pam (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080821
Title:
Custom caps lock action inconsistent on login screen
To manage notifications ab
Pam does not see the keyboard, only input text from the application
driving it. What Ubuntu flavor are you using? This determines what
package implements your lock screen.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
low risk of regression, it likely works or it doesn't. Reduces image
sizes. Worth taking as an FFe - approved.
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
apt does not show up on https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/priority-
mismatches.html
so this would wind up getting demoted again
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063101
Title:
Upd
Removing packages from oracular-proposed:
sslh 2.1.1-1 in oracular
sslh 2.1.1-1 in oracular riscv64
Comment: FTBFS; LP: #2079513
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: sslh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because
An Ubuntu-specific build failure caused by our compiler flags being more
strict than Debian's does not justify a package removal. This should be
fixed instead.
** Changed in: eso-midas (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
> * Add fibocom mbim service to libmbim
It is very unclear here what you mean by 'service'. From this
description I would have expected to see the addition of a systemd
service unit to the package, but there is none. The changelog is
inadequate for an SRU to explain to users what is being done.
A debdiff is attached for jammy, but there is a task still open for the
devel series. What is the status of this in later releases?
** Changed in: libmbim (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
nothing to be done on the archive side until the seeds are changed.
** Changed in: gcc-14 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069138
Title:
Demo
I don't think this belongs in the release notes for 24.04 or later if it
was already unusable in 22.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677
Title:
Remove dmraid from oracular?
To
Removing packages from oracular:
pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular
python3-pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular amd64
python3-pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular arm64
python3-pytzdata 2020.1+dfsg-9 in oracular armhf
python3-pytz
Reverse-Build-Depends
=
* buildlog-consultant (for librust-pyo3-file-dev)
* lintian-brush (for librust-pyo3-file-dev)
** Changed in: rust-pyo3-file (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Removing packages from oracular:
stravalib 1.3.0-1 in oracular
python3-stravalib 1.3.0-1 in oracular amd64
python3-stravalib 1.3.0-1 in oracular arm64
python3-stravalib 1.3.0-1 in oracular armhf
python3-stravalib 1.3.0-1 in ora
The version in the release pocket does not fail to build:
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-
rebuild-20241209-oracular-oracular.html
Is there an argument for removing this from the release pocket, or
should we only remove the new ftbfs version from -proposed?
** Changed in: s
Removing packages from oracular:
python-discord 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular
python-discord-doc 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular amd64
python-discord-doc 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular arm64
python-discord-doc 2.3.2+dfsg-2 in oracular armhf
pyth
Removing packages from oracular:
glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular
glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular amd64
glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular arm64
glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular armhf
glosstex 0.4.dfsg.1-4 in oracular ppc64e
Removing packages from oracular:
nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular
nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular amd64
nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular arm64
nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular armhf
nield 0.6.1-2 in oracular ppc64el
nield 0.6.1-2 in oracu
$ reverse-depends src:nield
No reverse dependencies found
$ reverse-depends src:nield -a source
No reverse dependencies found
$
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079349
Title:
Please re
If the header is dropped this build failure could maybe be fixed by just
dropping the reference to the header as well. But there is a different
build failure in Debian (Debian bug #1066535) and the package is removed
from Debian testing, so this is definitely a candidate for removal.
--
You rece
Build failure was fixed in 4.0.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1.
(There is still an autopkgtest failure.)
** Changed in: node-yarnpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
"stuck in proposed" is not a sufficient rationale for removal, can you
elaborate please?
** Changed in: sslh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207
Removing packages from oracular-proposed:
swiftlang 5.6.3-3 in oracular
Comment: FTBFS; LP: #2060818
1 package successfully removed.
The build failure may be fixed in swiftlang 5.7.3-1 which should
autosync next cycle.
** Changed in: swiftlang (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1758702 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758702
** Tags removed: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069200
Title:
RM: gitaly fro
Removing packages from oracular-proposed:
jupyter-ydoc 1.0.2-2 in oracular
Comment: Build-depends on non-existent python3-ypy; LP: #2072723
1 package successfully removed.
And added to extra-removals.
** Changed in: jupyter-ydoc (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released
--
You r
Removing packages from oracular-proposed:
libpsml 2.0.1-1 in oracular
Comment: Build-depends on non-existent libxmlf90-dev; LP: #2067729
1 package successfully removed.
and added to extra-removals.
** Changed in: libpsml (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this b
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 06:42:56PM -, Bernard Moreton wrote:
> Synaptic says for base-files: 13ubuntu10.1
This is the noble version. So I don't know where this 23.10 branding is
coming from for you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
What version of the base-files package do you have installed?
The login screen itself is not from Plymouth. This would normally be
from gdm or equivalent.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-amd64/20.4/+build/28901983
shows:
Get:63 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 shim-signed
amd64 1.51.4+15.8-0ubuntu1 [668 kB]
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-arm64/16.3/+build/28901984
shows:
Get:62 htt
i386 has been enabled by default on amd64 for quite some time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232
Title:
Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
To manage notifications ab
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232
Title:
Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
Originally I was going to make the argument that three replacements for
dmraid are not on-disk compatible, and therefore the Debian removal
rationale is disingenuous for anyone who is upgrading a system that
relies on this.
However, the fact that this has already been broken for two LTS cycles
wit
The only thing is, installing updates through the GUI default upgrader
is NOT supposed to accept solutions that require removing packages. So
this really needs to be tracked down and fixed. I don't think there's
anything further to be done in gnome-shell.
** Also affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Ok, sorry for overlooking.
Here's what it should look like:
$ apt policy gnome-shell
gnome-shell:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 42.9-0ubuntu2.2
Version table:
42.9-0ubuntu2.2 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.u
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232
Title:
Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
To manage noti
Upgrade: gnome-shell-common:amd64 (42.9-0ubuntu2.1, 42.9-0ubuntu2.2)
Remove: gnome-shell:amd64 (42.9-0ubuntu2.1),
This shows only gnome-shell-common being installed and gnome-shell being
removed. What does `apt policy` show for these two packages?
--
You received this bug notification because
Override component to main
sysprof 47~beta-1 in oracular: universe/devel -> main
1 publication overridden.
Override component to main
libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular amd64:
universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main
libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular arm64:
universe/libdev
> It's so weird. Autopkgtest on s390x fails because it can't open
> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ubuntu.jammy/STRUCTURE,
> apparently!?
This looks like a firewall problem on the s390x autopkgtest runners.
I see that you did a baseline retest with migration-reference/0 and th
$ syncpackage luit
Source luit -> oracular/Proposed: not in Ubuntu, new version 2.0.20221028-1
Downloading changelog from launchpadlibrarian.net (0.001 MiB)
[=>]100%
New changes:
luit (2.0.20221028-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream releas
Override component to main
ubuntu-x13s-settings 24.10.3 in oracular: universe/misc -> main
hwe-lenovo-x13s-meta 24.10.3 in oracular arm64: universe/misc/optional/100% ->
main
ubuntu-x13s-settings 24.10.3 in oracular arm64: universe/misc/optional/100% ->
main
ubuntu-x13s-settings-nogrub 24.10.3 in
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Removing packages from oracular-proposed:
django-assets 2.0-3 in oracular
Comment: FTBFS with python 3.12; LP: #2075168
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: django-assets (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Removing packages from oracular:
dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular
dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular amd64
dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular arm64
dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular armhf
dt-schema 2022.08.2-5 in oracular i386
Removing packages from oracular-proposed:
dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular
dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular amd64
dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular arm64
dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular armhf
dt-schema 2023.11-3 in oracular i386
check needs to include:
$ reverse-depends src:dt-schema
No reverse dependencies found
$ reverse-depends src:dt-schema -a source
No reverse dependencies found
$
looks clear.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Removed from disk 3 hours ago.
Removal requested 5 hours ago.
Deleted 6 hours ago by Steve Langasek
(From Debian) RoM; abandonned upstream; Debian bug #1076676
** Changed in: r-cran-metamix (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
(It is normally superfluous to open a removal request bug for a package
removed from Debian unstable.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076135
Title:
Removal request: r-cran-metamix
T
Removing packages from oracular:
cpptraj 5.1.0+dfsg-3build3 in oracular arm64
cpptraj 5.1.0+dfsg-3build3 in oracular armhf
cpptraj 5.1.0+dfsg-3build3 in oracular ppc64el
cpptraj 5.1.0+dfsg-3build3 in oracular s390x
Comment: ANAIS
4 packages successfully removed.
Not
Removing packages from oracular:
r-cran-dimred 0.2.6-1 in oracular armhf
Comment: ANAIS
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: r-cran-dimred (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
This is a straight swap, so no review needed.
Override component to main
mozjs128 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular: universe/libs -> main
libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% ->
main
libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% ->
Prior to upgrade, was this system configured for passwordless login?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075968
Title:
cannot login after upgrade from xubuntu 22.04 to 24.04
To manage no
Did you rule out the option of early-install'in systemd-resolved during
the upgrade? Then there wouldn't need to be special-casing of
resolv.conf because it wouldn't be "gone"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036467
Title:
Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum
mismatch
I'll try to reproduce with a clean profile when I have a moment.
In the meantime, could you tell me what systemd user unit the process is
part of on your system? I don't see anything in the gvfs-fuse package
itself that would start it as part of a user session.
--
You received this bug notificat
Public bug reported:
gvfs-fuse remains part of the Ubuntu Desktop in 24.04, however, I see in
my session that it is not running and as a result there are no mounts
available. I have Android mobile devices that I expect to be able to
access via fuse.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
P
latest/edge is not what we use (nor what we should use) in production.
When should we expect this to reach the default stable channels used on
Ubuntu LTSes?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted u-boot-pic64gx into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot-
pic64gx/2024.06-0ubuntu1~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this n
Have confirmed that with the mutter from noble-proposed, I'm able to
drop the 'WaylandEnable=false' line from /etc/gdm3/custom.conf and do
get a login screen (shown on the internal display only).
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
** Tags added: verification-done-noble
> 1. Disable auto-reporting in the system setting
This doesn't look like a test case that can be followed by someone
unfamiliar with the software.
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Hello Adam, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ipu6-drivers into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipu6-drivers/0~git202406240945.aecec2aa-0ubuntu2~24.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by test
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ipu6-drivers into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipu6-drivers/0~git202406240945.aecec2aa-0ubuntu2~24.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by
** Description changed:
[SRU Justfication]
[Impact]
Device camera won't work.
[Fix]
The current version in -proposed pocket may skip installation of built
kernel module ov02e10 and ov08a10. The fix is to use fixed index numbers
in dkms.conf.
[Test Case]
Install
** Package changed: grub (Ubuntu) => grub2 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073554
Title:
Grub2 Support for KVM on PowerVM
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
'apt show -a' shows you all available versions apt knows about, it does
not tell you what's installed. You want 'dpkg -l apparmor' (or 'apt
policy apparmor').
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
arch/riscv/cpu/mpfs/cpu.c, arch/riscv/cpu/mpfs/dram.c,
arch/riscv/cpu/pic64gx/cpu.c, arch/riscv/cpu/pic64gx/dram.c are new
files in u-boot-pic64gx-20240624 listed as 'Copyright (C) 2018, Bin Meng
'. Please include this in debian/copyright.
arch/riscv/dts/mpfs-tysom-m.dts lists Copyright (C) 2020-
u-boot-pic64gx_2024.06
well, somewhat unfortunate wrt license review that this doesn't align
with any of the u-boot upstream tags; I guess I'll compare with
2024.04...
The u-boot source package has in debian/copyright:
Files-Excluded:
drivers/dma/MCD_tasks.c
u-boot-pic64gx does not. Do you k
oracular has s390-tools 2.33.1-0ubuntu3. Is there any further change
needed on that package, or should that task be marked resolved?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044104
Title:
[UB
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067672
Title:
[SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at no
+ * Fixed the symbolic links with libssl3t64. (LP: #2067672)
This is insufficiently clear as a changelog entry for an SRU. I am
adjusting this to:
+ * Fixed the symbolic link target for the changelog and copyright
files. (LP: #2067672)
Otherwise, this is straightforward and I am sponsoring to
Per the above comment this is reported to be fixed in 3.2.2-1ubuntu1
which is in oracular-proposed, so setting the status to 'fix committed'.
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
What is the status of this bug in noble? It needs to be resolved for
noble before we can SRU it to jammy and focal.
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 02:23:27PM -, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Thanks Andreas for ping us about the issue. We have work to do there on
> the desktop side since language-selector is currently relying on that
> feature
Yes, there is not a clear replacement for ~/.pam_environment wrt setting
env
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 03:08:42PM -, Robie Basak wrote:
> @Steve could you comment please?
According to the Debian maintainer in the changelog:
- Perform a SONAME bump to avoid stomping on upstream SONAME. Once and if
the new symbols are accepted by upstream then we can merge that
Based on the bug discussion, my understanding is there is currently not
anything here to sponsor, so unsubscribing. Please resubscribe ubuntu-
sponsors when this is ready for another look.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Mantic will EOL soon. This has never been supported in noble. It's
unfortunate that it remained enabled in mantic as long as it did when we
knew we intended not to support it, inducing some users to rely on an
unsupported configuration, but I don't think there's any more action to
take here.
If y
The message in question is from "EFI stub", which is part of the kernel,
not grub. The reference grub patch is for an unrelated issue.
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notifica
** Tags removed: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071885
Title:
System takes 5 Minutes (300 Seconds) to Boot - Regression of previous
BUG ?
To manage notifications
> I am trying to build my own image
> using 0001-com-ubuntu-server-jammy
> (20_04-lts) image using ARM template
> but, it is failing to validate SSH
> keys generated though it is in
> openSSH format and have required
> permissions.
None of this appears to have to do with software on Ubuntu, or the
** Tags removed: fountations-todo
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065180
Title:
performance regression in dracut-install 060
To manage notifications a
Hello Gabriel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.14.1~22.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
Hello Denison, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.14.1~22.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
Hello Didier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.14.1~22.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubu
Hello Juarez, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.14.1~22.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubu
Hello Gabriel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.14.1~22.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
Hello Didier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.14.1~22.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubu
Hello Fabio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.14.1~22.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubun
Hello Gabriel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.14.1~22.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
Hello Gabriel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.14.1~22.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
Hello Jean-Baptiste, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.14.1~22.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
For the desktop, console-setup only handles the declaration of the
keyboard mappings; the actual toggling between keymaps is handled up the
stack in the X or Wayland stack. Are you using X or Wayland here?
** Package changed: console-setup (Ubuntu) => xorg-server (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: xorg-ser
> First, I note that since this is a new upstream version, there are a number
> of bugs referenced in the
> changelog that are not going to go through SRU verification. Per
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Bug_references_in_changelogs,
> please update the
> descriptions of these bug
Public bug reported:
My laptop is plugged into main power most of the time, but as I'm
currently travelling, it's connected a lot more intermittently right
now. So I don't know when this problem started. But I noticed my
desktop indicator was reporting 9% charge and that the battery was not
bein
independent of anything else, the package uploaded to the NEW queue in
oracular does not have a compliant Ubuntu version number: 0.50.0-7 was
never a Debian package version, as cmocka-extensions has never been in
Debian (and is not in the NEW queue currently). Please reupload with a
correct versio
I've completed the review of the rest of the adsys delta. This looks
good to me; my only observation is that as part of the change of i18n
handling libraries, there are two regressions in the localizability of
strings:
internal/adsysservice/service.go: updateFmt := "%s" + gotext.Get(", updated on
** Package changed: grub (Ubuntu) => grub2 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061373
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Print grub message before the uefi POST
screen disappears
autopkgtests passed for jammy and mantic.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy verification-done-mantic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Attached the kernel logs (journalctl -b0 -k --until 'May 22 16:31:05',
which is when my user login under X began), plus logs for the gdm
service as well as the gdm session (which seems to be where most of the
actual log activity happens).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
** Attachment added: "journal-for-gdm-session.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/2066931/+attachment/5788985/+files/journal-for-gdm-session.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
1 - 100 of 11171 matches
Mail list logo
