[Bug 156381]

2013-08-19 Thread Winfrieddonkers
(In reply to comment #23) excerpt from workdir/*/JunitTest/sc_unoapi/done.log: checking: [sc.ScModelObj::com::sun::star::sheet::XGoalSeek] is iface: [com.sun.star.sheet.XGoalSeek] testcode: [ifc.sheet._XGoalSeek] LOG Execute: seekGoal() LOG Goal Result: 16.0 Divergence: 0.0 LOG

[Bug 156381]

2013-08-19 Thread Winfrieddonkers
(In reply to comment #29) @Winfried: Master's 416d10b5f91047f0dcfbcc233c60322810bfc8d0 could be backported to 4-0 as well but additionally to resolving some merge conflicts would also need some adaption as there the ScDocument:GetValueCell() and ScDocument::GetFormulaCell() methods don't

[Bug 156381]

2013-08-09 Thread Winfrieddonkers
Created attachment 83889 calc sheet with the goal seek tests from Junittest_sc_unoapi I've put the data form the Junittest on a calc sheet, with the outcomes as I would expect them. Presently, I don know whether the Junittest is wrong, or the patch. I could add a unittest to

[Bug 156381]

2013-07-06 Thread Winfrieddonkers
I confirm problem -as described in comment 3 and comment 4 - still exists on master. I will look into the code and see if i can find the cause and a fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 156381]

2013-08-02 Thread Winfrieddonkers
A proper fix will take some time as the problem is deep inside the code, hidden in a maze of recursive and iterative code. Also, the chances are that when fixed, calc will no longer hang, but neither give a solution. The reason for this is that in attachment 46880 the formula in every cell

[Bug 156381]

2013-07-12 Thread Winfrieddonkers
I have a dirty fix: The MAXRECURSION (/core/sc/source/core/data/formulacell.cxx) value of 400 is reached; increasing it 'solves' the problem. However, there will always be a case where the MAXRECURSION value is reached, so a proper handling of this situation is required. Also, a 'best' value

[Bug 156381]

2013-07-12 Thread Winfrieddonkers
I also confirm what Takeshi Abe reported, i.e. that the cause is not in ScInterpreter::ScBackSolver(), but in SCFormulaCell::Interpret(). At some point the result is no longer calculated but equal to the previous result, causing an infinite loop in ScBacksolver() since changing the start value