[Bug 75527] dist upgrade on feisty tries to remove apt

2006-12-12 Thread peter green
Public bug reported: debian:/# apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be REMOVED apt build-essential g++ g++-4.1 gaim gaim-dev gaim-xfire groff-base libaspell15

[Bug 75527] Re: dist upgrade on feisty tries to remove apt

2006-12-12 Thread peter green
debian:/# ls /var/log/dist-upgrade ls: /var/log/dist-upgrade: No such file or directory -- dist upgrade on feisty tries to remove apt https://launchpad.net/bugs/75527 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 75527] Re: dist upgrade on feisty tries to remove apt

2006-12-12 Thread peter green
i think there are two sides to this issue. one is the same issue that is in 75504 which is that libstdc++ can't be upgraded due to a dependency problem and the old libstdc++ is blocking other upgrades. the other is that dist-upgrade is presenting a soloution to an upgrade request that involves

[Bug 75527] Re: dist upgrade on feisty tries to remove apt

2006-12-14 Thread peter green
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 75562 *** I did not run update manager and never did i say that i did, its a minimal chroot and I don't even think i have update manager installed. I used apt-get dist-upgrade yesterday without problems, but that is almost certainly the result of the archive

[Bug 1283226] Re: gtk+3.0_3.10.7-0ubuntu2 FTBS (trusty)

2014-02-25 Thread peter green
** Also affects: raspbian Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283226 Title: gtk+3.0_3.10.7-0ubuntu2 FTBS (trusty) To manage notifications

[Bug 1283226] Re: gtk+3.0_3.10.7-0ubuntu2 FTBS (trusty)

2014-02-28 Thread peter green
** Changed in: raspbian Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283226 Title: gtk+3.0_3.10.7-0ubuntu2 FTBS (trusty) To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1277882] Re: FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function 'gtk_source_style_scheme_get_style'

2014-03-01 Thread peter green
The fix for this is trivial, debdiff of what I uploaded to raspbian to fix it is attatched (note: I have tested this fix in raspbian jessie and debian sid but not in ubuntu). ** Patch added: Fix uploaded to raspbian

[Bug 1277882] Re: FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function 'gtk_source_style_scheme_get_style'

2014-03-01 Thread peter green
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #740448 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740448 ** Also affects: gitg (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740448 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1327912] [NEW] boost-mpi-source1.55 ftbfs on arm64, internal compiler error

2014-06-08 Thread peter green
Public bug reported: boost-mpi-source1.55 failed to build on arm64 with a number of internal compiler errors. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/176974418/buildlog_ubuntu-utopic-arm64 .boost-mpi-source1.55_1.55.0%2Bdfsg-1ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz I suspect this is the same issue I just reported

[Bug 1464882] [NEW] python3-debian fails to load utf-8 changelog

2015-06-13 Thread peter green
Public bug reported: Attempting to load a changelog containing non-ascii utf-8 characters using the changlog module python3-debian in ubuntu vivid (version 0.1.22ubuntu1 of python3-debian) fails. root@debian:/# zcat /usr/share/doc/qt4-doc/changelog.Debian.gz testchangelog root@debian:/# file

[Bug 1632555] Re: "etherpuppet -s 9999 -C -i eth0" returns help text

2017-04-27 Thread peter green
This bug will affect any Debian/Ubuntu/etc system which uses unsigned chars. i386 and amd64 systems are not affected. I will be uploading a fix to raspbian soon. ** Also affects: etherpuppet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1632555] Re: "etherpuppet -s 9999 -C -i eth0" returns help text

2017-04-27 Thread peter green
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #861366 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861366 ** Also affects: etherpuppet (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861366 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1416296] Re: elk-lapw is missing dependency on openmpi-bin

2018-12-29 Thread peter green
elkcode is the source package name, elk-lapw is the binary package name. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416296 Title: elk-lapw is missing dependency on openmpi-bin To manage

[Bug 1632555] Re: "etherpuppet -s 9999 -C -i eth0" returns help text

2018-11-21 Thread peter green
** Changed in: raspbian Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: etherpuppet (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632555 Title:

[Bug 1835320] Re: mu-editor python debugger broken.

2019-07-05 Thread peter green
Thanks robbie, here is a new debdiff with the changelog changes you requested. ** Patch added: "mu-editor.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mu-editor/+bug/1835320/+attachment/5275240/+files/mu-editor.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1835320] Re: mu-editor python debugger broken.

2019-07-08 Thread peter green
I can confirm that 1.0.2+dfsg2ubuntu0.1 from the disco proposed repo fixes the issue for me. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-disco ** Tags added: verification-done-disco -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1835320] [NEW] mu-editor python debugger broken.

2019-07-03 Thread peter green
Public bug reported: The "debug" function in mu-editor is broken in the version shipped in Ubuntu disco. Since mu is intended as a tool for teaching beginner programmers this servely limits it's usefulness. Nick Morrot and I have already fixed this in sid and the fix from sid has already

[Bug 1835320] Re: mu-editor python debugger broken.

2019-07-03 Thread peter green
** Description changed: The "debug" function in mu-editor is broken in the version shipped in Ubuntu disco. Since mu is intended as a tool for teaching beginner programmers this servely limits it's usefulness. Nick Morrot and I have already fixed this in sid and the fix from sid has

[Bug 1835320] Re: mu-editor python debugger broken.

2019-07-03 Thread peter green
** Description changed: The "debug" function in mu-editor is broken in the version shipped in Ubuntu disco. Since mu is intended as a tool for teaching beginner programmers this servely limits it's usefulness. Nick Morrot and I have already fixed this in sid and the fix from sid has

[Bug 1835320] Re: mu-editor python debugger broken.

2019-07-03 Thread peter green
** Description changed: The "debug" function in mu-editor is broken in the version shipped in Ubuntu disco. Since mu is intended as a tool for teaching beginner programmers this servely limits it's usefulness. Nick Morrot and I have already fixed this in sid and the fix from sid has

[Bug 1866954] Re: upgrade archivemount to 0.8.12

2020-05-01 Thread peter green
I see you have filed this bug for both Raspbian and Ubuntu. As the maintainer of Raspbian I don't intend to deal with this locally in Raspbian. IMO the correct way to deal with this would be in Debian, then both Raspbian and Ubuntu would automatically pick it up in their next releases. **

[Bug 1841982] Re: package fp-compiler-3.0.0 3.0.0+dfsg-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 217

2020-08-21 Thread peter green
I suspect this is a manifestation of https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826300 The bug was long ago fixed, but the nature of the bug would mean re- bootstrapping is needed, i'm not sure if there still exists a ubuntu archive for 32-bit powerpc and if-so who controls it. There

[Bug 1892412] [NEW] reprotest autopkgtest failing with new diffoscope

2020-08-20 Thread peter green
Public bug reported: According to https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#fpc The reprotest autopkgtests for amd64, ppc64el and s390x are failing with diffoscope 156 and blocking it's migration from groovy proposed to groovy release. This in turn means

[Bug 1892180] Re: librust-backtrace+object-dev is not installable

2021-07-05 Thread peter green
The librust-backtrace+object-dev package no longer exists since Ubuntu 20.10 Groovy. ** Changed in: rust-backtrace (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1892178] Re: librust-backtrace+gimli-dev is not installable

2021-07-05 Thread peter green
The librust-backtrace+gimli-dev package no longer exists since Ubuntu 20.10 Groovy. ** Changed in: rust-backtrace (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1892177] Re: librust-backtrace+findshlibs-dev is not installable

2021-07-05 Thread peter green
The package is installable again since Groovy (Checked Groovy, Hirsute and Impish) ** Changed in: rust-backtrace (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1892182] Re: librust-crossbeam+nightly-dev is not installable

2021-07-05 Thread peter green
The librust-backtrace+nightly-dev package no longer exists since Ubuntu 20.10 Groovy. ** Changed in: rust-backtrace (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1892179] Re: librust-backtrace+gimli-symbolize-dev is not installable

2021-07-05 Thread peter green
The package is installable since Groovy (checked Groovy, Hirsute and Impish) ** Changed in: rust-backtrace (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1897610] Re: Wrong executable name in description

2021-07-05 Thread peter green
These typos have been fixed in rust-bat 0.12.1-2 and later which are in Ubuntu groovy and newer. ** Changed in: rust-bat (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2061202] Re: rust-glib-sys fail to pass autopkgtests

2024-04-13 Thread peter green
** Patch added: "differences between code shipped upstream and code generated from sid's gir" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-glib-sys/+bug/2061202/+attachment/5764742/+files/regenerate-from-gir.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2061202] Re: rust-glib-sys fail to pass autopkgtests

2024-04-13 Thread peter green
** Patch added: "differences between code generated from sid's gir and code generated from experimental's gir" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-glib-sys/+bug/2061202/+attachment/5764743/+files/regenerate-from-gir-exp.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 2061202] Re: rust-glib-sys fail to pass autopkgtests

2024-04-13 Thread peter green
I had a look at this and I discovered multiple issues. The first is that the package fails to build because gir-rust-code generator needs a time64 fix that ubuntu doesn't currently have. Said fix is available in Debian experimental, you should just be able to sync it. The second is tests failing

[Bug 2054491] Re: rust-ureq autopkgtest fails

2024-05-09 Thread peter green
Yeah, if it was a rust team package I'd just fix it from the Debian side, but the last time I asked Jonas to change something to help with a ubuntu specific issue he did the opposite. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.