[Bug 1777070] Re: firefox plugin libwidevinecdm.so crashes due to apparmor denial
Solved it for me by editing /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox on XSE (Debian- & Xubutnu 18.04 LTS-based distro): # per-user firefox configuration #... owner @{HOME}/.{firefox,mozilla}/**/gmp-widevinecdm/*/lib*so m, That solved the problem when using Mz Firefox 100.0 (64-bit) and widevine 4.10.2449.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777070 Title: firefox plugin libwidevinecdm.so crashes due to apparmor denial To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1777070/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1960285] [NEW] package openmpi-bin 4.1.0-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed openmpi-bin package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2
Public bug reported: Happened during an OS upgrade. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 Package: openmpi-bin 4.1.0-10ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-99.112-generic 5.4.162 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-99-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown Date: Mon Feb 7 19:48:13 2022 DuplicateSignature: package:openmpi-bin:4.1.0-10ubuntu1 Installing new version of config file /etc/openmpi/openmpi-mca-params.conf ... update-alternatives: error: /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/mpi corrupt: slave link same as main link /usr/bin/mpicc dpkg: error processing package openmpi-bin (--configure): installed openmpi-bin package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2 ErrorMessage: installed openmpi-bin package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2 InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-30 (648 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20200203.1) Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.9, Python 3.9.7, python3-minimal, 3.9.4-1build1 PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.18-9 RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.20.9ubuntu2 apt 2.3.9 SourcePackage: openmpi Title: package openmpi-bin 4.1.0-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed openmpi-bin package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2022-02-08 (0 days ago) ** Affects: openmpi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package impish need-duplicate-check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960285 Title: package openmpi-bin 4.1.0-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed openmpi-bin package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openmpi/+bug/1960285/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1464064] Re: Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS
The only solution ATM is to check https://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/3q53kc/list_of_ubuntu_repository_mirrors_available_over/ an chose a nearby mirror. Then compare http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic- security/InRelease and your mirror, e.g. https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/dists /bionic-security/InRelease (mirror of the FAU (university) located in Germany) and make sure "Date:" in the top section of the InRelease file is equivalent (not more off than 6 to 12 hrs) between the two files. Then adjust your /etc/apt/sources.list e.g. like this: ## Main repository for Ubuntu distributions. This line was auto-added in ## 2018 to provide a fallback, in case no network mirror is available. # deb cdrom:[Xubuntu 18.04.1 LTS _Bionic Beaver_ - Release amd64 (20180725)]/ bionic main restricted # deb cdrom:[Xubuntu 18.04.1 LTS _Bionic Beaver_ - Release amd64 (20180725)]/ bionic universe # deb cdrom:[Xubuntu 18.04.1 LTS _Bionic Beaver_ - Release amd64 (20180725)]/ bionic multiverse ## See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to ## newer versions of the distribution. ## Major bug fix updates are produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic main restricted deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic main restricted deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates main restricted deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates main restricted deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security main restricted deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security main restricted ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-backports main restricted deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-backports universe multiverse ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic universe deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic universe deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates universe deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates universe deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security universe deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic multiverse deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic multiverse deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates multiverse deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates multiverse deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security multiverse deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. ## It includes Adobe Flash, Google SDK and IBM Java. #deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu bionic partner #deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu bionic partner Then run: sudo apt-get check sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get upgrade sudo apt-get clean sudo apt-get autoclean sudo apt-get autoremove sudo dpkg --purge `dpkg --get-selections | grep deinstall | cut -f1` sudo apt-get check Make sure `sudo lsof /var/lib/apt/lists/lock` does not output something besides a warning of /run/user/1000/gvfs. If so terminate the offender if possible and/or run `sudo dpkg --configure -a`. That's it. All your APT updates will now run TLS-secured (HTTPS), -except- for your Launchpad PPA updates, located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. AFAIK their links cannot be transformed from HTTP to HTTPS yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464064 Title: Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1464064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1774711] Re: excessive seccomp audit logs
Will the required pat set be backported to older kernel, such as Ubuntu 4.15.0-70.79-generic 4.15.18? Will the patches be in 20.04 LTS (kernel >= 4.18), which is around the corner? NOTE: Unfortunately with issue #1774711 the use of "auditd" has become problematic on systems with SSDs, since systemd allows in-memory configuration (Storage=volatile; SplitMode=none), but auditd does not support such a complex configuration (write_logs = no; log_file = /var/log/audit/audit.log). That means with the excessive SECCOMP lines (i.e. tens/hundreds of thousands a day) we cannot re-enable auditd (sudo systemctl start|enable auditd.service) until this issue is resolved, UNLESS there is a way to make auditd not to write logs to disk but continue to function properly. We need auditd for enforcing audit.rules (complex ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, etc. compliant rulesets) and statistics (sudo aureport (-n)), which require log data stored (dmesg kernel bugger is insufficient for ISO compliant store and analysis of events and stats). Our tests show, that up to several hundred MiB of logs are written to the SSDs per pay, which accumulates to approx 0.5 TiB over the course of 4 years. With in avg. 50% of the SSD cells occupied and given the models, this translates to a slightly increased wear-out of our SSDs, even when a good wear-leveling algorithm and background garbage collector is in use (our desktop models: Samsung Enterprise SSD with super capacitor mod. SM/PM863(a)). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774711 Title: excessive seccomp audit logs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1774711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1752091] Re: gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed
Hello TJ, your gvfs-package build on https://launchpad.net/~tj/+archive/ubuntu/bugfixes seems to have resolved the problem for me! Therefore, a 1000 thanks! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752091 Title: gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1752091/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1774711] Re: excessive seccomp audit logs
For the record: My/our signature line is: Ubuntu 4.15.0-50.54-generic 4.15.18 Messages look like this: Jun 07 01:40:42 TDOG-ADM-AD-VM7 audit[25263]: SECCOMP auid=4294967295 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4294967295 pid=25263 comm="chromium-browse" exe="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser" sig=0 arch=c03e syscall=257 compat=0 ip=0x7f658fa04db1 code=0x5 Jun 07 01:40:42 TDOG-ADM-AD-VM7 audit[25263]: SECCOMP auid=4294967295 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4294967295 pid=25263 comm="chromium-browse" exe="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser" sig=0 arch=c03e syscall=257 compat=0 ip=0x7f658fa04db1 code=0x5 Jun 07 01:40:42 TDOG-ADM-AD-VM7 audit[25263]: SECCOMP auid=4294967295 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4294967295 pid=25263 comm="chromium-browse" exe="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser" sig=0 arch=c03e syscall=257 compat=0 ip=0x7f658fa04db1 code=0x5 Jun 07 01:40:42 TDOG-ADM-AD-VM7 audit[25263]: SECCOMP auid=4294967295 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4294967295 pid=25263 comm="chromium-browse" exe="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser" sig=0 arch=c03e syscall=257 compat=0 ip=0x7f658fa04db1 code=0x5 Jun 07 01:40:42 TDOG-ADM-AD-VM7 audit[25263]: SECCOMP auid=4294967295 uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4294967295 pid=25263 comm="chromium-browse" exe="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser" sig=0 arch=c03e syscall=257 compat=0 ip=0x7f658fa04db1 code=0x5 ... Precondition is that auditd.service is started. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774711 Title: excessive seccomp audit logs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1774711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1752091] Re: gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed
Yes Antonio (tonecas), this looks promising indeed. Could the Ubuntu Developers please look in to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/commit/d7e1397854f32e793b4f65d894908d67072dcb3f and port this to "gvfs (Ubuntu)" and rebuild? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752091 Title: gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1752091/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1464064] Re: Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS
With regards to CVE-2019-3462, my organization agrees with the statement made on NSA QUANTUM: https://twitter.com/TRONDELTA/status/1087810526539931649 On behalf of my intelligence organization, I think it would be much better, if Canonical servers would require TLS >= 1.2 encryption (HSTS and ECDHE preferred) and thus identify themselves properly, so machines/users would be able make sure who they are talking/connecting to. We think that would definitely make MITM and MOTS attacks more difficult. Personally, I'm aware of the existing signature scheme, i.e. present package security. Nonetheless, it does not seem to address the problem of transport security; especially the lack of identification. Therefore, I simply consider the assertions of whydoesaptnotusehttps.com as wrong. There is also a research paper named "A Look In the Mirror: Attacks on Package Managers" (https://isis.poly.edu/~jcappos/papers/cappos_mirror_ccs_08.pdf), which showed that both APT and YUM repositories are vulnerable to replay attacks, in case the repository is accessed via HTTP (even with valid GPG signatures used). In addition to that, Launchpad bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1647467 showed, that transport security sometimes may reduce the impact of known vulnerabilities and exposures. Given the present state of things, I agree, on behalf of the members of my organization, that TLS should be optional, at least for a transitional period of LTS (5) years. We strongly recommend the decision makers at Canonical to act professionally on this and make a change soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464064 Title: Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1464064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1647467] Re: InRelease file splitter treats getline() errors as EOF
> It allows for attacking a repository via MITM attacks, circumventing the signature of the InRelease file. > ("deb http://192.168.0.2:1337/debian/ jessie-updates main" or so). [..] This simulates a MITM attack or compromised mirror. That sounds like it matters, where that InRelease file comes from, right? When I look into my /etc/apt/sources.list, I only see deb/dev-src http://.archive.ubuntu.com/... entries. I think it would be much better, if Canonical servers would require TLS 1.x encryption (STS preferred) and thusly identify themselves with a proper cert, so machines/users can make sure (nation-state actors not taken into account) who they're talking to. I think that would definitely make MITM and MOTS attacks more difficult. I'm aware of the signatures, i.e. present package security, though. Nonetheless, they do not seem to address the problem of transport security. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647467 Title: InRelease file splitter treats getline() errors as EOF To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1647467/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1635809] Re: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)
Every time I log into Xubuntu's Xfce, using LightDM I can see the following log lines in /var/log/lightdm/seat0-greeter.log The configuration was not changed significantly, except for lightdm-gtk- greeter-settings, in which I chose theme Adwaita-dark and icons elementary-xfce-dark. ** Message: 22:15:21.895: Starting lightdm-gtk-greeter 2.0.5 (Mar 20 2018, 09:53:31) ** Message: 22:15:21.896: [Configuration] Reading file: /usr/share/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf.d/01_ubuntu.conf ** Message: 22:15:21.896: [Configuration] Reading file: /usr/share/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf.d/30_xubuntu.conf ** Message: 22:15:21.896: [Configuration] Reading file: /etc/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf ** (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): WARNING **: 22:15:22.155: [PIDs] Failed to execute command: upstart (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:22.401: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.215: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.240: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.290: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.306: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.323: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.341: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.356: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.374: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.391: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.408: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.424: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.441: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.457: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.474: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.491: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.507: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.523: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.540: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.557: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.574: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.675: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.692: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.708: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar) (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING
[Bug 1774711] Re: excessive seccomp audit logs
After some research I can now safely confirm this bug. However, the log lines do not seem to be related to any rules in "/etc/audit/rules.d" or AppArmor profiles loaded. %‑) The only difference between the log lines in *this* bug report, my lines and the ones mentioned on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507282 seems to be system- specific configuration, e.g. SELinux. Over the past 24 hours, I also had sometimes 100 lines at once in my log when opening or reloading a web page, in a new tab in Firefox. Therefore Firefox seems to be the only "offending" application at present. I also cleared the /etc/audit/rules.d and uninstalled the AppArmor extras packages (apparmor-profiles, apparmor-profiles-extra) with the Firefox profiles in it. Unfortunately the logs lines still poured in. Therefore I also changed the abstractions for Firefox (/etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers) and commented out everything Firefox related, with no avail. The problem is somewhere deeper and not Firefox-specific. I hope Tyler Hicks (tyhicks) is correct and the fixes mentioned will soon be available. Due to the problem I generated several GiB of logs a day which is not so good for my SSD (even with wear-leveling). My temporary workaround is to stop auditd, since unlike /etc/systemd/journald.conf there is no Storage=volatile option for auditd. :-0 ',:-l >:/ ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1507282 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507282 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1117953 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117953 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774711 Title: excessive seccomp audit logs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1774711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1774711] Re: excessive seccomp audit logs
Oh in short my /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules looks like this: -D -b 8192 -f 1 -i --backlog_wait_time 0 -w /etc/anacrontab -p w -k AU-FS01-0001 [some more -w `foo` -p w -k `bar` here ...] Has someone here tried https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117953 / adding a "-a task,never" to /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules? Is that a bit extendive? However, https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/kernel/seccomp.c?id=326bee0286d7f6b0d780f5b75a35ea9fe489a802 looks very promising! - /* -* Let the audit subsystem decide if the action should be audited based -* on whether the current task itself is being audited. -*/ - return audit_seccomp(syscall, signr, action); + audit_seccomp(syscall, signr, action); Thanks Tyler! :× -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774711 Title: excessive seccomp audit logs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1774711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1752091] Re: gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed
I can confirm the problem on my system: gvfsd-metadata[PID]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed (hundrets of entries ...) As a temporary workaround I killed (only) the gvfsd-metadata process (will auto-respawan, unless changed in systemd) and erased the local gfvs-metadata directory (will be recreated with a file in it): $ sudo pkill gvfsd-metadata $ rm -rf ~/.local/share/gvfs-metadata After that the logs disappeared from my system. Removing removing its binary /usr/libexec/gvfsd-metadata however is not a good practice, since it may lock up your system. As a better alternative I tried to change /usr/share/dbus-1/session.conf like this (right before the directive/tag): and changed /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-metadata via: $ sudo chmod 000 /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-metadata Unfortunately though this led to further problems and a lock-up, not allowing to open further applications like the Thunar file explorer: systemd[PID]: gvfs-metadata.service: Failed to execute command: Permission denied systemd[PID]: gvfs-metadata.service: Failed at step EXEC spawning /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-metadata: Permission denied Maybe just the D-Bus rule would have been enough? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752091 Title: gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1752091/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1309535] Re: Running without pam-kwallet installed issues a warning in auth.log
I can confirm the problem with `journalctl`: Jan 03 01:05:13 tron lightdm[12730]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet.so): /lib/security/pam_kwallet.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or dire Jan 03 01:05:13 tron lightdm[12730]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_kwallet.so Jan 03 01:05:13 tron lightdm[12730]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet5.so): /lib/security/pam_kwallet5.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or di Jan 03 01:05:13 tron lightdm[12730]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_kwallet5.so Jan 03 01:05:14 tron lightdm[12841]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet.so): /lib/security/pam_kwallet.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or dire Jan 03 01:05:14 tron lightdm[12841]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_kwallet.so Jan 03 01:05:14 tron lightdm[12841]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet5.so): /lib/security/pam_kwallet5.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or di Jan 03 01:05:14 tron lightdm[12841]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_kwallet5.so The lines were created during logins, i.e. initial logins or after locking the screen (xflock4) and unlocking it again. The workaround I used was to change /etc/pam.d/lightdm and /etc/pam.d /lightdm-greeter and comment out (#) the following lines (in both files): #authoptionalpam_kwallet.so #authoptionalpam_kwallet5.so ... #session optionalpam_kwallet.so auto_start #session optionalpam_kwallet5.so auto_start So far the systemd log is clear of those loglines. A different workaround would be to simply install the KDE component. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309535 Title: Running without pam-kwallet installed issues a warning in auth.log To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1309535/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1513387] Re: spinning wheel when using bridged setup
Which version of the distribution does it affect, Peter? Also does it happen during LiveCD usage or on an already installed system? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1513387 Title: spinning wheel when using bridged setup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1513387/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1406516] Re: Autostarted applications don't render correctly
Cannot confirm this on our 18.04 installations. Btw. bug is: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: xfce4-session 4.11.0-1ubuntu1 therefore EOL. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406516 Title: Autostarted applications don't render correctly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-session/+bug/1406516/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1304914] Re: Session don't remember place on desktop when exit
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1371144 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371144 Seems to be the case for me too, as long as I use Xfce4 (since 2008). Glad someone mentioned it. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304914 Title: Session don't remember place on desktop when exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-session/+bug/1304914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1131044] Re: Shortcuts such as Ctrl+F9 set but are unresponsive
Um.. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: xfce-keyboard-shortcuts 4.10.0-1 I think this should be closed, since its an STS version, end of life since 2014. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131044 Title: Shortcuts such as Ctrl+F9 set but are unresponsive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxfce4ui/+bug/1131044/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1713313] Re: Unable to launch pkexec'ed applications on Wayland session
Franck, I liked your post, because I think you addressed a serious issue. As Joanna R. (Invisible Things Lab) pointed out repeatedly, X is not secure by design. However, I don't understand your question whether one should use firewalld instead of ufw? Isn't that an entirely different matter? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713313 Title: Unable to launch pkexec'ed applications on Wayland session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/1713313/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1780933] Re: [SRU] xfce4-settings 4.12.4, New upstream microrelease
Ah, thanks for your explanation and clarification, Simon and Łukasz. It now makes sense to me. :-) Wish you a pleasant weekend! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780933 Title: [SRU] xfce4-settings 4.12.4, New upstream microrelease To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-settings/+bug/1780933/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1780933] Re: [SRU] xfce4-settings 4.12.4, New upstream microrelease
"[..] and if you are member of the ~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe the team." Huh? Wow, why does the bug bot say that? Doesn't sound too nice; btw. if someone is a team member that may be for a reason, right? *confused* -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780933 Title: [SRU] xfce4-settings 4.12.4, New upstream microrelease To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-settings/+bug/1780933/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997153] Re: xfce4-panel does not show all windows if panel area to small
Both systems 11.10 and 12.04 are EOL. It was pointed out correctly, that there have been several (eol) versions of Ubuntu since 2012. No wonder there are 736594 open and 67280 unconfirmed bugs on launchpad. By the way I cannot confirm this behavior on Xubutnu 14.04 LTS and 18.04 LTS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997153 Title: xfce4-panel does not show all windows if panel area to small To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/997153/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1550898] Re: xfce4-terminal remembers only history of one tab when restoring saved session
** Summary changed: - Remembers only history of one tab when restoring saved session + xfce4-terminal remembers only history of one tab when restoring saved session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550898 Title: xfce4-terminal remembers only history of one tab when restoring saved session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-terminal/+bug/1550898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1768793] Re: Tab title not set
Is this Roland B. from the Xfe file explorer project? I love the software and use Xfe every day! :-] Regarding the bug I think it must be a regeression, since its not present in 14.04 LTS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768793 Title: Tab title not set To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-terminal/+bug/1768793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1768528] Re: ugly lowres login icon
Package lightdm-gtk-greeter-setting seemed not to be available from the selection menu though. However, current sate is TRIAGED (wishlist) for package lubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu), which seems appropriate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768528 Title: ugly lowres login icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm-gtk-greeter/+bug/1768528/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1768528] Re: ugly lowres login icon
Thanks Hadmut! Since lubuntu-icon-theme is not listed on Lauchpad (PPAs not considered) I added lubuntu-artwork as an affected package. You're right also; it comes out of the box after installation that way. I can confirm that. Therefore it should be fixed. ** Also affects: lubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: lightdm-gtk-greeter -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768528 Title: ugly lowres login icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm-gtk-greeter/+bug/1768528/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1768528] Re: ugly lowres login icon
Well, adding a different distribution resulted in: Oops! Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad. We’ve recorded what happened, and we’ll fix it as soon as possible. Apologies for the inconvenience. (Error ID: OOPS-5ac38be1f3c1ceca3e245935663fd246) That's not helpful either. Simon, please be so kind and add the correct package or distro so the problem can be fixed. We saw the problem in Lubuntu 18.04 LTS, with the DEFAULT user icon on the initial login screen. It is of poor quality indeed; thus the default user icon should be replaced and a package update and respun ISOs provided when possible. ** Also affects: lightdm-gtk-greeter Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768528 Title: ugly lowres login icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm-gtk-greeter/+bug/1768528/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1768528] Re: ugly lowres login icon
Hadmut, would you please execute: sudo dpkg-query -S to determine the exact package name where the image file resides? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768528 Title: ugly lowres login icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm-gtk-greeter/+bug/1768528/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573995] Re: I just upgraded to 16.04 and I'm getting a AppArmor Message AppArmor Message Profile:usr?sbin/dnsmasq Operation: connect Name: run/dbus/system_bus_socket Denied:wr Logfile: /var/log/
Looks trivial though... The AppArmor profile may need an entry like "/var/log/kern.log rw,". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573995 Title: I just upgraded to 16.04 and I'm getting a AppArmor Message AppArmor Message Profile:usr?sbin/dnsmasq Operation: connect Name: run/dbus/system_bus_socket Denied:wr Logfile: /var/log/kern.log DebuggingApparmor" for Ubuntu and when I try and enter my encription phrase it says something like no shell. Also, when I try and check for updates I am told I'm up to date ? Please let me know how I can debug AppArmor ? Randy Adamson adamsonran...@gmail.com Thanks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1573995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1754150] Re: OEM installation test case doesn't follow screen sequence
The problem was confirmed and documented on iso.qa.ubuntu.com on 2018-04-26. see: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/389/builds/171062/testcases/1305/results/ ** Changed in: ubuntu-manual-tests Status: Opinion => Confirmed ** Also affects: boot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: boot (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754150 Title: OEM installation test case doesn't follow screen sequence To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bug/1754150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 292794] Re: VirtualBox virtual machines are frozen after suspend-resume
Yes, Ubuntu QA Website (ubuntuqa) reported that the bug was reported. However its not *exactly* the same bug. The environment is similar and the description matches, except that the VM freeze happens during suspend (black screen w/ cursor in the upper left corner) and *not* during resume. Killing of VirtualBox processes was not necessary. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292794 Title: VirtualBox virtual machines are frozen after suspend-resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ose/+bug/292794/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1740289] Re: print_req_error: critical target error, dev sr0, sector 2097136
It's not exactly the same, but I see the following during reboot, when testing Xubuntu 18.04 daily ISO (2018-04-21), on VirtualBox 4.3 installed on a trusty system. [ 118.XX] print_req_error: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 1178984 [ 118.XX] print_req_error: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 1177462 References: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/current/ https://www.google.com/search?q=launchpad+print_req_error%3A+I%2FO+error%2C+dev+sr0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1740289 Title: print_req_error: critical target error, dev sr0, sector 2097136 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1740289/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1741609] Re: linux: 3.13.0-139.188 -proposed tracker
I found the following thread, which explains some things. I'll post it here in case someone else was looking for an answer. https://askubuntu.com/questions/991874/how-to-disable-page-table- isolation-to-regain-performance-lost-due-to-intel-cpu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741609 Title: linux: 3.13.0-139.188 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1741609/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1741609] Re: linux: 3.13.0-139.188 -proposed tracker
> - kaiser: add "nokaiser" boot option, using ALTERNATIVE O.k. for clarification; does GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="nokaiser" in /etc/default/grub disable kaiser at boot time then? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741609 Title: linux: 3.13.0-139.188 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1741609/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1726478] [NEW] Netplan not creating .network file under certain conditions
Public bug reported: OS: Ubuntu 17.10 Here's the scenario: network: version: 2 ethernets: ens160: addresses: [10.50.0.9/24] gateway4: 10.50.0.1 nameservers: addresses: [8.8.8.8,8.8.4.4] vlans: ens160.100: id: 100 link: ens160 ens160.200: id: 200 link: ens160 ens160.300: id: 300 link: ens160 bridges: br-mgmt: interfaces: [ens160.100] addresses: [192.168.100.1/24] br-overlay: interfaces: [ens160.200] addresses: [192.168.200.1/24] br-storage: interfaces: [ens160.300] In this configuration, a 'netplan apply' applies the following configuration: root@ubuntu:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br-mgmt 8000.7282c779e298 no ens160.100 br-overlay 8000.ce8884059e7b no ens160.200 br-storage 8000.b6fc84976f4f no ens160.300 root@ubuntu:~# ip a 1: lo:mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: ens160: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:50:56:a8:92:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.50.0.9/24 brd 10.50.0.255 scope global ens160 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fea8:9285/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: br-overlay: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether ce:88:84:05:9e:7b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.200.1/24 brd 192.168.200.255 scope global br-overlay valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::cc88:84ff:fe05:9e7b/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 5: br-mgmt: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 72:82:c7:79:e2:98 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.100.1/24 brd 192.168.100.255 scope global br-mgmt valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::7082:c7ff:fe79:e298/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 6: ens160.200@ens160: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-overlay state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:50:56:a8:92:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: ens160.100@ens160: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-mgmt state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:50:56:a8:92:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 8: ens160.300@ens160: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-storage state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:50:56:a8:92:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 9: br-storage: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether b6:fc:84:97:6f:4f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff root@ubuntu:~# ls -l /run/systemd/network total 48 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 34 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-br-mgmt.netdev -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 57 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-br-mgmt.network -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 37 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-br-overlay.netdev -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 60 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-br-overlay.network -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 37 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-br-storage.netdev -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 50 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.100.netdev -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 89 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.100.network -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 50 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.200.netdev -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 92 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.200.network -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 50 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.300.netdev -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 92 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.300.network -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 142 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.network Here's the problem: In our environment, there's no need to have an IP address on a bridge, and this has been reflected in the yaml for the br- storage interface. Without an IP address assigned via dhcp: true or addresses: [x.x.x.x/x], the br-storage interface is configured in a DOWN state and won't pass traffic. I can set the interface UP with iproute2 and it will pass traffic as expected. With ifupdown, we were able to bring up the br-storage interface at boot with the following config: auto br-storage iface br-storage inet manual During troubleshooting, I found that without specifying an address in the yaml, netplan is not creating the respective .network file for the interface in /run/systemd/network. I created a file named '10-netplan- br-storage.network' with the following contents: [Match] Name=br-storage [Network] Restarted systemd-networkd with the following: systemctl restart systemd-networkd As a result, the br-storage interface came up and bridged traffic as
[Bug 1425974] Re: SSH on instance does'nt return the shell
This may be an MTU issue. If you are able to console to the instance, try dropping the MTU of the interface to 1450. If it works, option 26 can be passed via DHCP. You may find some helpful info at https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1322799. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425974 Title: SSH on instance does'nt return the shell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1425974/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'
Quote by r0lf: The NTP code has seen numerous security vulnerabilities and we have to assume that ntpdate is not receiving the same scrutiny anymore when compared to NTPd. Sorry r0lf, but that's laughable. Do you really want people to run a fully featured (your wording: vulnerable) NTP daemon just to do s.th. like this (ntpdate -u HOSTNAME /var/log/messages 21) one a day within a /etc/cron.hourly/ntp? Don't get me wrong -- I agree with you on the upstream-part of your statement, but I disagree when it comes to bloat systems unnecessarily. Once OS used to be simple, only containing things which their operators needed. Why force them into running daemons the don't really have demand for? I think ntpd -qg is the only option, although far from perfect. https://twitter.com/TRONDELTA/status/546138511284658177 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583994 Title: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/583994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'
Quote by r0lf: The NTP code has seen numerous security vulnerabilities and we have to assume that ntpdate is not receiving the same scrutiny anymore when compared to NTPd. Sorry r0lf, but that's laughable. Do you really want people to run a fully featured (your wording: vulnerable) NTP daemon just to do s.th. like this (ntpdate -u HOSTNAME /var/log/messages 21) one a day within a /etc/cron.hourly/ntp? Don't get me wrong -- I agree with you on the upstream-part of your statement, but I disagree when it comes to bloat systems unnecessarily. Once OS used to be simple, only containing things which their operators needed. Why force them into running daemons the don't really have demand for? I think ntpd -qg is the only option, although far from perfect. https://twitter.com/TRONDELTA/status/546138511284658177 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583994 Title: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/583994/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1415340] [NEW] lvconvert segmentation fault on merge
Public bug reported: 1: System information root@saturn:~# lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Release:14.04 2: Package information root@saturn:~# apt-cache policy lvm2 lvm2: Installed: 2.02.98-6ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.02.98-6ubuntu2 Version table: *** 2.02.98-6ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status root@saturn:~# 3. Expected behavior: lvconvert --merge should not segfault after merge is successful. 4. Actual behavior: root@saturn:~# mount /dev/saturn/rings.two /mnt root@saturn:~# touch /mnt/foo root@saturn:~# umount /mnt root@saturn:~# valgrind lvconvert --merge /dev/saturn/rings.two ==23772== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==23772== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==23772== Using Valgrind-3.10.0.SVN and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info ==23772== Command: lvconvert --merge /dev/saturn/rings.two ==23772== ==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1024 in syscall close() ==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1025 in syscall close() ==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1026 in syscall close() ==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1027 in syscall close() ==23772==Use --log-fd=number to select an alternative log fd. ==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1028 in syscall close() ==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1029 in syscall close() ==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1030 in syscall close() Merging of volume rings.two started. Internal error: Reserved memory (126324736) not enough: used 126881792. Increase activation/reserved_memory? rings: Merged: 97.0% ==23772== Invalid read of size 8 ==23772==at 0x481A79: lv_is_merging_cow (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x4997DD: dev_manager_snapshot_percent (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x43AF2B: lv_snapshot_percent (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x417110: ??? (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x427C3F: ??? (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x4281BC: poll_daemon (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x41853B: lvconvert_poll (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x41862A: ??? (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x41A9D2: ??? (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x42EF21: process_each_lv_in_vg (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x4304B4: process_each_lv (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x41B3DC: lvconvert (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772== Address 0x28 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd ==23772== ==23772== ==23772== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV): dumping core ==23772== Access not within mapped region at address 0x28 ==23772==at 0x481A79: lv_is_merging_cow (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x4997DD: dev_manager_snapshot_percent (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x43AF2B: lv_snapshot_percent (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x417110: ??? (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x427C3F: ??? (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x4281BC: poll_daemon (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x41853B: lvconvert_poll (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x41862A: ??? (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x41A9D2: ??? (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x42EF21: process_each_lv_in_vg (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x4304B4: process_each_lv (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772==by 0x41B3DC: lvconvert (in /sbin/lvm) ==23772== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack ==23772== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but ==23772== possible), you can try to increase the size of the ==23772== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag. ==23772== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608. ==23772== ==23772== HEAP SUMMARY: ==23772== in use at exit: 586,786 bytes in 712 blocks ==23772== total heap usage: 9,622 allocs, 8,910 frees, 19,027,414 bytes allocated ==23772== ==23772== LEAK SUMMARY: ==23772==definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==23772==indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==23772== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==23772==still reachable: 586,786 bytes in 712 blocks ==23772== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==23772== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory ==23772== ==23772== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v ==23772== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Merge was successful: root@saturn:~# mount /dev/saturn/rings /mnt root@saturn:~# ls /mnt -la total 17 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 1024 Jan 28 00:01 . drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 Jan 17 06:36 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jan 28 00:01 foo drwx-- 2 root root 12288 Jan 28 00:00 lost+found Replication steps (For me, anyways): 1) Create empty lv (lv0) 2) create snapshot of lv (lv1) 3) Create filesystem on lv0 4) Create snapshot of lv0 (lv2) 5) mount lv2 and use touch to create a file 6) unmount lv2 7) lvconvert --merge /dev/vol00/lv2 ** Affects: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: Core file from valgrind/lvconvert in initial
[Bug 947664] Re: Unpacking linux-headers unbelievably slow in Lubuntu Precise (Beta 1)
I can confirm this bug. The following operations took about 15 minutes. sudo apt-get install linux-generic linux-headers-generic linux-headers-generic-lts-quantal linux-image-generic linux-image-generic-lts-quantal linux-tools linux-tools-lts-quantal [...] Unpacking linux-headers-3.2.0-53 (from .../linux-headers-3.2.0-53_3.2.0-53.81_all.deb) ... Unpacking linux-headers-3.2.0-53-generic (from .../linux-headers-3.2.0-53-generic_3.2.0-53.81_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking linux-headers-3.5.0-40 (from .../linux-headers-3.5.0-40_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_all.deb) ... Unpacking linux-headers-3.5.0-40-generic (from .../linux-headers-3.5.0-40-generic_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_amd64.deb) ... [...] Meanwhile: :~$ sudo ps aux | grep 'dpkg' root 1243 1.0 1.2 119988 96836 pts/6Ds+ 11:56 0:04 /usr/bin/dpkg --status-fd 71 --unpack --auto-deconfigure /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.2.0-53-generic_3.2.0-53.81_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-40-generic_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-generic_3.2.0.53.63_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-generic_3.2.0.53.63_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-53_3.2.0-53.81_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-53-generic_3.2.0-53.81_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-generic_3.2.0.53.63_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.5.0-40_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.5.0-40-generic_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-generic-lts-quantal_3.5.0.40.46_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-generic-lts-quantal_3.5.0.40.46_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-tools-3.2.0-53_3.2.0-53.81_am d64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-tools_3.2.0.53.63_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-tools-3.5.0-40_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-tools-lts-quantal_3.5.0.40.46_amd64.deb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947664 Title: Unpacking linux-headers unbelievably slow in Lubuntu Precise (Beta 1) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/947664/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999910] Re: [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard)
Looks promising. So far I installed 3.5.0-31 on two X230 and it runs flawlessly. On some of my T430 its not yet perfect. Sometimes the devices hang during boot sequence and docking/undocking is not yet stable. However display errors in Unity are far less. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10 Title: [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/10/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 492734] Re: ntpd profile in Xubuntu 8.04 LTS is unconfined on boot
The current status to this problem/bug on one of the last non-migrated machines here is: 0 processes are unconfined but have a profile defined. However Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS is EOL (end of life) and therefore someone close this bug, please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492734 Title: ntpd profile in Xubuntu 8.04 LTS is unconfined on boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/492734/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 61619] Re: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative
Yeah, probably the meta package really depends on one of the two ntp packages. I guess its just not important enough at this point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619 Title: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/61619/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 288496] Re: winbind postinst returned error exit status 1 (daemon failed to start)
The content of comment #10 from 2009-12-29 is obsolete. It works flawlessly right now. Also the distribution and package are EOL. I do not have the powers to change this bug to WONT FIX state. Someone here at Launchpad either give that permission to me or mark it as such, please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288496 Title: winbind postinst returned error exit status 1 (daemon failed to start) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/288496/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 999910] Re: [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard)
Adam, thank you for that update. Yet I can indeed confirm a significant improvement for 3.2.0-43 and -44 (same +sec fixes). Guess some intel stuff was added in -43 (as I heard). I also recall something from the changelogs. With regards to 3.5.0-xx I hope things were backported. So fare these with = 3.5.0-30 seem to run stable as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10 Title: [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/10/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 492734] Re: ntpd profile in Xubuntu 8.04 LTS is unconfined on boot
The current status to this problem/bug on one of the last non-migrated machines here is: 0 processes are unconfined but have a profile defined. However Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS is EOL (end of life) and therefore someone close this bug, please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492734 Title: ntpd profile in Xubuntu 8.04 LTS is unconfined on boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/492734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 505995] Re: java crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
The distribution is EOL (end of life) and the software version is also obsolete. Therefore I recommend to change this bug to WONT FIX now since this annot and won't be reproduced ever according to the original bug report description. I think in case this is still an issue someone will file a new bug with up-2-date information and debug information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/505995 Title: java crashed with signal 5 in _XError() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libx11/+bug/505995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
The bugs name should be altered. I think Microsoft is just one player in this game. Have you realized some things changed since the 90's? Just imagine... Oracle took over Sun, Apple released OS 10 (X) and BSD is a powerful and usable OS . :-] Seriously guys I think Microsoft is not the biggest problem we have and neither is Apple or some other company. The biggest problem right now is 'us'. I think we have a problem with Linux, with quality and with the direction in which things are going. Yes, I say we have a problem with quality and 100k+ bugs here. We have a problem with users still making a valid point in saying Ubuntu is to hard to install and to yet not usable in the same way and everywhere like the systems of our competitors. All that is not Microsoft's fault. And even a major market share for a dinosaur like them is not a problem in the first place. However it matters whether our quality is better or not. Bill Gates was wrong when he replied to Jobs in the 80's that it doesn't matter. It does matter – you can see it yourself! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 Title: Microsoft has a majority market share To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/clubdistro/+bug/1/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247746] Re: winbind should be downgraded to Recommends
I agree with commenter #6, Etienne. I think this bug is not specific to any given distribution release number and therefore not obsolete yet. Can the appropriate owner/person in charge (S. R.) alter the package and set the dependency to recommends, please? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247746 Title: winbind should be downgraded to Recommends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/247746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61619] Re: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative
Yeah, probably the meta package really depends on one of the two ntp packages. I guess its just not important enough at this point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619 Title: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/61619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 288496] Re: winbind postinst returned error exit status 1 (daemon failed to start)
The content of comment #10 from 2009-12-29 is obsolete. It works flawlessly right now. Also the distribution and package are EOL. I do not have the powers to change this bug to WONT FIX state. Someone here at Launchpad either give that permission to me or mark it as such, please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288496 Title: winbind postinst returned error exit status 1 (daemon failed to start) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/288496/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117514] Re: seahorse does not synchronize keys with keyserver
The bug is still assigned to Ubuntu Desktop Bugs team and gnome-bugs #401655 in status confirmed. Can someone there provide us with an update with regards to the issue/bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117514 Title: seahorse does not synchronize keys with keyserver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/seahorse/+bug/117514/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148454] Re: console-kit-daemon spawns too many threads
See #101 and #128, please. I suggested you to do nothing at all. The memory consumption has nothing to do with the bugs name console-kit- daemon spawns too many threads (comment #107, #108, #110, #116) in my opinion. And threads are not expensive when it comes to context changes. Also some people here seem not to understand the concept of virtual memory. The developer from freedesktop.org pointed that out AFIR. My opinion is still: do nothing at all. Neither is it worth the time nor is this bug from 2007-10-03 still an issue. The old UNIX system V init system is not the latest technology and superseded mostly although not exclusively by systemd. Additionally the latest stable kernel version is now 3.9.3 and in Ubuntu 10.04.x LTS its 3.2.0-xx LTS kernel (until 2016) or via LES (EnablementStack) its 3.5.0 and 3.8.0 from quantal and raring respectively. I do not have the powers to change this bug to WONT FIX state. Someone here at Launchpad either give that permission to me or mark it as such, please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148454 Title: console-kit-daemon spawns too many threads To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/consolekit/+bug/148454/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1073114] Re: Shopping Lens Does Not Respect User Privacy
The bug is unassigned since no one whats to have the responsibility I assume. Honestly I came to Xubuntu and Canonical (to a certain extend) years ago since I was fed up with M$ and their broken system. At present however I'm in the middle of a migration to FreeBSD -- also because of bugs like this one. By the way I agree with the last commenter, Jeroen Hoek. I don't have the time to read every newsletter or announcement but at least some of them. I never received an explanation either and probably never will. In my opinion its O.K. for a company like Canonical to make profit like Red Hat and others do but its not O.K. to do it like M$ or companies like these. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073114 Title: Shopping Lens Does Not Respect User Privacy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunity/+bug/1073114/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61619] Re: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative
Nonetheless nice to see some progress with regards to this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619 Title: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/61619/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 61619] Re: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative
Nonetheless nice to see some progress with regards to this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619 Title: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/61619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999910] Re: [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard)
I experienced the freezes and problems during boot as well as docking/undocking with several Lenovo X230 (new devices) in our computing lab. I checked all the hardware so far (board, CPU, RAM) with the appropriate diagnostic tools so far (Lenovo Diagnostics, Intel CPU Diagnostics and Memtest86+). so I can confirm the hardware works fine. Further I migrated two systems from Ubuntu 12.04.0 LTS (with upgrades applied) to Xubuntu 12.04.2 LTS (with upgrades applied) and realized a major improvement. Sometimes a system freezes (completely, no NUM lock works, no Video repost, completely frozen) At present I see three things to test: - Try the Ubuntu LTSEnablementStack (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack) which upgrades Kernels from 3.2.0.x to 3.5.x. - Try the prorietary NVidia graphics driver for GNU/Linux 64 bit which is however not in the repositories and this must be managed manualy from that time on. - Try to completely disable: compositing in Xfce, power savings in Xfce and with Kernel parameter and adjust EFI settings if applicable. I think it is a combination of Kernel, X11 and GPU driver (nouveau) which makes the system freeze. Since Ubuntu has Unity this GUI pulls several packages as a dependency which I can not overlook. It seems like Xfce is better with regards to this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10 Title: [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/10/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572155] Re: Splash image wrong size when two displays connected
I have a Lenovo 230 notebook with an LCD attached to the docking station and an external 24 screen connected to the very same station. As long as the 24 screen is offline (switched of) the Plymouth boot screen is correctly scaled at 1366x768 in the notebooks LCD -- which is the primary screen. But in case the system is booted with the 24 monitor connected and enabled (switched on) -- which is the secondary screen -- the LCD shows the boot screen displaced in the upper left corner. About 30% of the primary LCD screen are black. The boot screen on the 24 screen is in a wrong resolution at that time and not the recommended 1920x1200. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572155 Title: Splash image wrong size when two displays connected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/572155/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1097042] Re: Risk of filesystem corruption with ext3 in lucid
Yes, but it's not in hardy server which is supported until April 2013 AFAIK. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097042 Title: Risk of filesystem corruption with ext3 in lucid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1097042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1073114] Re: Shopping Lens Does Not Respect User Privacy
I read R. Stallmans article Ubuntu Spyware: What to Do? as well as the reply On Richard Stallman and Ubuntu by Jono B. Therefore I can say that Jono plain wrong. On the one hand he shares the goals of the FSF and points out that he shares the very same goals as well and on the other hand he apolizizes for pushing it by implementing this technology into recent Ubuntu releases. In my opionion Ubuntu became what it is today (among other reasons) due to the fact it did not include spyware. Yes, it is spayware and about the same Microsoft, Apple and some others implemented in the past. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073114 Title: Shopping Lens Does Not Respect User Privacy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunity/+bug/1073114/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1022012] Re: (CVE-2012-3374) pidgin-2.10.5: MXit buffer overflow
Thanks for your input, Tyler. My colleagues and I came to the same cnclusion yesterday when we read the CERT messages and digged a bit deeper regarding the MXit protocol. We run several different versions of Pidgin from 2.4.1 to 2.10.6. Fortunately none of the packages was shipped with a MXit plugin. I tried to build a Pidgin 2.6.6 package which runs on Ubuntu 8.04 to 12.04, but faild to apply some patches to the code. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022012 Title: (CVE-2012-3374) pidgin-2.10.5: MXit buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pidgin/+bug/1022012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1022012] Re: (CVE-2012-3374) pidgin-2.10.5: MXit buffer overflow
Is there currently a workaround for this flaw? Upgrade on my site was delayed due to corporate procedures. Can I disable that MXit thing somehow? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022012 Title: (CVE-2012-3374) pidgin-2.10.5: MXit buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pidgin/+bug/1022012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993088] [NEW] package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126
Public bug reported: Error reported on startup just after login ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue May 1 16:43:56 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126 SourcePackage: samba4 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-01 (0 days ago) ** Affects: samba4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993088 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/993088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993088] Re: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993088 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/993088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805492] [NEW] [ICH4 - Intel ICH5, playback] No sound at all
Public bug reported: When I go to sound preferences the test of my device (standard analog out) works fine on both channels but no applications are able to play sound. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: pulseaudio 1:0.9.22+stable-queue-24-g67d18-0ubuntu3.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23. Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: phil 1496 F pulseaudio Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'ICH5'/'Intel ICH5 with AD1981B at irq 17' Mixer name : 'Analog Devices AD1981B' Components : 'AC97a:41445374' Controls : 34 Simple ctrls : 23 Date: Mon Jul 4 09:52:26 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: pulseaudio Symptom: audio Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:ICH5 successful Symptom_Card: Internal Audio - Intel ICH5 Symptom_DevicesInUse: 1496 Symptom_PulsePlaybackTest: PulseAudio playback test failed Symptom_Type: No sound at all Title: [ICH4 - Intel ICH5, playback] No sound at all UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 04/09/2004 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 2001 dmi.board.name: P4SD-VL dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTek Computer Inc. dmi.board.version: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.chassis.asset.tag: P122B03B8108B89578E9 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.version: US dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2001:bd04/09/2004:svnSonyCorporation:pnVGC-RA710G(UC):pvr28478433:rvnASUSTekComputerInc.:rnP4SD-VL:rvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrUS: dmi.product.name: VGC-RA710G(UC) dmi.product.version: 28478433 dmi.sys.vendor: Sony Corporation ** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805492 Title: [ICH4 - Intel ICH5, playback] No sound at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/805492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805492] Re: [ICH4 - Intel ICH5, playback] No sound at all
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805492 Title: [ICH4 - Intel ICH5, playback] No sound at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/805492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 792993] Re: package man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792993 Title: package man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 792993] [NEW] package man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: man-db Freshly installed system on a Sony Vaio laptop, problem detected upon first reboot ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-32.62-generic 2.6.32.38+drm33.16 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-32-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jun 4 19:31:51 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20110211.1) SourcePackage: man-db Title: package man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault) ** Affects: man-db (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792993 Title: package man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 792140] [NEW] package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba When trying to do any upgrades in 11.04, I got a Samba4 error. This error occurred when I tried to remove Samba from my system ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jun 2 19:28:18 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139 SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-26 (7 days ago) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792140 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 792140] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792140 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 792140] [NEW] package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba When trying to do any upgrades in 11.04, I got a Samba4 error. This error occurred when I tried to remove Samba from my system ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jun 2 19:28:18 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139 SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-26 (7 days ago) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792140 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 792140] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792140 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 773660] Re: Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/poo
Thank you all for your help. I've now reinstalled On 1 May 2011 23:06, Jean-Baptiste Lallement jean-bapti...@ubuntu.com wrote: This is caused by the mirror being out of sync. I'm closing this report because it's not a bug with Ubuntu. ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773660 Title: Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x /xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-75dpi /xfonts-75dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden Status in “update-manager” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Binary package hint: update-manager Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-75dpi/xfonts-75dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/773660/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773660 Title: Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x /xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-75dpi /xfonts-75dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773660] [NEW] Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-75dpi/xfonts-75dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773660 Title: Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x /xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-75dpi /xfonts-75dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553100] Re: Audacious initialization assertion failed on icon change
Sorry, but I can't since I'm running Xubuntu 8.04 LTS. -- Audacious initialization assertion failed on icon change https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 48407] Re: unmounting broken, mounting for normal users
I tried to follow the Workflow described on [L1] but yet without success. On the one hand I don't know which OS bug #48407 refers to. Maybe it's Ubuntu 6.06 which has been discontinued except for the rarely used server distibution (until June 2011). On the other hand there is no demand for a fix I guess and so one shoudl rther check whether Hardy or Lucid suffer from the same problem. [L1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow -- unmounting broken, mounting for normal users https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 66518] Re: Startup Notification broken
I don't suffer from that regresion in Xubuntu 8.04 LTS (hardy) since I'm using Xfce I guess. On a side note, it would be much better if ubuntu used something more like vista's UAC. E.g. instead of entering a password you just push Allow or Deny. The reason for this is that entering your password is annoying, and is open to phishing style attacks. With just a simple allow or deny it would be secure against phishing attacks. Implementing it securely would not be an easy task. -- Is a good thin IMKO and I will put it to Ubuntu brainstorm. ;-) -- Startup Notification broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66518 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576642] [NEW] XScreensaver causes Lubuntu 10.04 LTS to hang in LiveCD mode using sun VirtualBox
Public bug reported: When running the latest build as of 06.05.2010 (Lubuntu 10.04 LTS) using Sun VirtualBox on Xubuntu 8.04 LTS the following problem occoured. After a few minutes inactivity the screensaver started which I interrupted quickly. When opening the xscreensaver configuration from the Applications panel a window was drawn with the list of available screensavers on the left and an live view of the current selected screensaver on the right (as usual). The problem however was, that after a few seconds the VM became totally busy when displaying the current screensaver (default, with yellow snowflakes or something). I was even unable to close the xscreensaver config window or choose the option »no screensaver« in the upper left corner. As a result I had to switch to tty1 on my host machine and sigterm (15) the Sun VirtualBox process instance. For clarification I actually ran xscreensavers on Xubuntu 10.04 LTS in the past when testing ISO (qa.ubuntu.com) and my computer is also fast enough (3100 MIPS (AMD K7/M10 @ 1,53Ghz)). As a temporary fix I recommend the packagers/remasterers at the Lubuntu team to disable screensavers by default and select either none or »blank screen« as default. Besides the aforementioned implications this behavior would also better fit to a less resource consuming distribution. Screensavers cause much problems and there is also blueprint on Lauchpad regarding that matter [L1]. [L1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/screensaver-review Note: I ask the Lubuntu team to provide MD5/SHA1 sums at theri publicaly available download repositories. Unfortunately I was unable to confirm the image integrity with MD5, but the LiveCD integrity check returned an error in one file. ** Affects: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: iso-testing -- XScreensaver causes Lubuntu 10.04 LTS to hang in LiveCD mode using sun VirtualBox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575260] Re: package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ub untu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welc hes auch in Paket xine-plugin ist
The problem dissapeared after I manually purged the »sun-java6-plugin« package yesterday and reinstalled it today. I assume the error (Try to overwrite »/usr/lib/firefox«, which is also in package »xine-plugin«.) is not present anymore. Thanks to whoever fixed it! :-) -- package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ubuntu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket xine-plugin ist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575260] [NEW] package sun-java6-plugin 6-17 -0ubuntu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche , »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket xine-plugin ist
Public bug reported: Wen I tried to upgrade the system via sudo apt-get upgrade the error occoured. System is Xubuntu 8.04.4 LTS. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Tue May 4 18:18:51 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket xine-plugin ist NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ubuntu1.8.04 PackageArchitecture: i386 SourcePackage: sun-java6 Title: package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ubuntu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket xine-plugin ist Uname: Linux 2.6.24-27-generic i686 ** Affects: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ubuntu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket xine-plugin ist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575260] Re: package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ub untu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welc hes auch in Paket xine-plugin ist
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47803410/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47803411/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ubuntu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket xine-plugin ist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574182] Re: Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
Sebastian, in case this bug has already been reported/is a dupblicate I ask you to link it with that bug so everyone can follow. -- Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574182 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574199] [NEW] Thunar stops opening directories in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: thunar For this bug report [1] and [2] applies. After installation of the mentioned Xubuntu ISO I started configuring the system the way I prefer it simply for the purpose of testing. I have to admit that I noticed the bug I report here even in the build of 2001-04-19. After configuration of Thunar usage is no problem until a few directories were traversed. It does not seem to matter which dirs are accessed, in which recursion depth or thelike. Thunar simply pevents me from opening a further directory after a short period of time. From then on doubleclicking on a directory has no effect at all. Besides that haven't yet noticed anything else. The thunar version is the current one. [1] Source: iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/4172 Xubuntu Desktop i386 / Xubuntu 10.04 LTS (20100429) Direct download : http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20100429/lucid-desktop-i386.iso MD5Sum : OK [2] Hardware (VM): AMD Athlon K7/M10 1.53GHz, 448MB RAM, ATI RV350 AS [Radeon 9550] w/16MB Resolution 800x600; no Sun VirtualBox guest additions installed ** Affects: thunar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: iso-testing -- Thunar stops opening directories in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574199 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574199] Re: Thunar stops opening directories in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
** Attachment added: Thunar configuration file http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47463733/thunarrc -- Thunar stops opening directories in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574199 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480094] Re: xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()
It also happened when testing [L1]. I marked the bug as serious in iso.qa.ubuntu.com since this happened the third time to me now and I think it is a severe drawback for Xubuntu users. [L1] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20100429/lucid- desktop-i386.iso -- xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552000] Re: xubuntu logo in plymouth splash screen looks like it has spider webs in it
It's still not fixed as of 3rd May 2010. Is there maybe another problem? -- xubuntu logo in plymouth splash screen looks like it has spider webs in it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552000 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574162] [NEW] gnome-search-tool warning regarding non-standard escape code
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-utils Whenever running gome-search-tool on my Xubuntu 8.04.4 LTS installation I get lots of the following messages in my ~/.xsession-errors: ** (gnome-search-tool:15805): WARNING **: gsearchtool_strdup_strftime does not support non-standard escape code %k (translated from german to english) gnome-utils: installed:2.20.0.1-1ubuntu5 possible packages:2.20.0.1-1ubuntu5 version table: *** 2.20.0.1-1ubuntu5 0 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I expect this to stop since it floods the aforementioned file and exceeds aprox. 180kib which stops logging to this file then. ** Affects: gnome-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-search-tool warning regarding non-standard escape code https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574162 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574182] [NEW] Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
Public bug reported: As already mentioned I ran the latest available build [1]. After installation using VirtualBox [2] the login screen (GDM) looks a bit malformed. More specifically the bottom bar has a misplaced icon on the lower right and the font is cut off on the left side. The screenshot makes it easy to confirm this. [1] Source: iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/4172 Xubuntu Desktop i386 / Xubuntu 10.04 LTS (20100429) Direct download : http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20100429/lucid-desktop-i386.iso MD5Sum : OK [2] Hardware (VM): AMD Athlon K7/M10 1.53GHz, 448MB RAM, ATI RV350 AS [Radeon 9550] w/16MB Resolution 800x600; no Sun VirtualBox guest additions installed ** Affects: xubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: iso-testing -- Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574182 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574182] Re: Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
** Attachment added: Xubuntu GDM Screenshot http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47453424/xfce_login_oddly_shaped.png -- Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574182 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275561] Re: gpaint has no undo funtionality
I'm using Xubuntu 8.04 LTS GNU/Linux (2.6.24-27-generic / i686) and have gpaint v0.3.3 installed. Without undo/redo functionality the program is hard to use. I wonder how the authors could actually use it. I also ask the triager of this bug to set importance at least to medium. Regarding my Xubuntu installation I have to uninstall gpaint now due to the sverity/impact of this bug. -- gpaint has no undo funtionality https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275561 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568218] Re: Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)
Ok I think you can mark this bug as invalid since I can't reproduce this. I either made a mistake or there is no problem anymore. I can adjust mouse speed even in LiveCD mode when configuring ImExPS/2 Generic Explorer Mouse. -- Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 505677] Re: Xubuntu needs a Ubiquity slideshow
Great someone already adressed that issue! I wanna mention though, that the installation is still a bit *boring* for the average user. It all started really nice with an explaination about existing games and stuff like that, but from then on only that help information (see attached image) was shown to me (after about 50% installation progress). Honestly... I had no chance but to read the same help text a 100 times. :-( ** Attachment added: Ubiquity at 94% with few changes http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45248311/ubuquity_info.png -- Xubuntu needs a Ubiquity slideshow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/505677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568218] Re: Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)
Things have changed and I ask people to confirm this if possible. After installation (on HDD) of Xubuntu (20100419) changes took effect when configuring Xfce as follows: Accelleration from 2,0 (default) to 1,0 and threshold from 4 to 8. I applied these settings to all (3) predefined profiles. I noticed the effect first after configuring ImExPS/2 Generic Explorer Mouse. Next I'll do is to recheck these settings. In case it was my mistake I'll let you know. -- Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539027] Re: end_request: I/O error rebooting at end of install Lucid
* I can confirm this the same way charlie-tca did when testing. I used Xubuntu daily (20100419), casper 1.236. * After clicking on restart now Xfce shuts down and you drop to the tty where you see daemons stopping, etc. * In the end (before the actual reboot) I receive dozens of these I/O errors (screenshot attached). * Installation from LiveCD was not affected any further. * My hardware is custum (VM: 1,53 Ghz AMD K7/gen10; 448Mb DDR-SD-RAM (in VM); ATI RV350 AS [Radeon 9550] w/ 256Mib) * Could this rather be a problem in plymouth? ** Attachment added: squashfs_read_error.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45253847/squashfs_read_error.png -- end_request: I/O error rebooting at end of install Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568218] [NEW] Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)
Public bug reported: As already mentioned I ran the latest available build [1] and followed the guidelines mentioned on [2]. Though everything worked out fine I realized that changed mouse settings in LiveCD-mode did not take effect (screenshot of area of interest attached). I expect mouse settings to work even when running in LiveCD mode because the mouse speed is much to hight to be producteve. People with disabilities would probably locked out and thus be unable to install or use Xubuntu right from the start. Unfortunately I cannot attach the /var/log/Xorg.0.log here since I can establish but not browse FTP connections with Gigolo. I think the problem is related with thunar somehow. Wenever I open that filebrowser it prevents me from acessing directories after a while. So I'm unable to browse to /var/log with Thunar for e.g. In case someone can provide me with imformation how to transfer files off Virtualbox to my system I will provide you with whatever you need. [1] Source: iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/4002 Xubuntu Desktop i386 / Xubuntu 10.04 LTS (20100419) Direct download : http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20100419/lucid-desktop-i386.iso MD5Sum : 9686959ea68ae9d5c008fc7f42406f1e [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Testing/TestingInfo/Short ** Affects: xubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: mouse xfce4.6 xubuntu -- Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568218] Re: Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)
** Attachment added: Screenshot http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44998731/screenshot_vm_20100419_mouse.png -- Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568233] Re: Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000140/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000142/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000143/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000145/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000146/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000147/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000148/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000149/XsessionErrors.txt -- Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568233] Re: Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()
** Description changed: Binary package hint: xfce4-panel - Argh! I hoped this field would have been filled out automatically. - - I tested Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) in LiveCD mode (no installation or - thelike). - - When attempting to shut down xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in - _IceTransWrite(). + I tested Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) in LiveCD mode (no installation or thelike). + When attempting to shut down xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite(). ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: xfce4-panel 4.6.3-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Apr 22 03:52:41 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xfce4-panel LiveMediaBuild: Xubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Release Candidate i386 (20100419) ProcCmdline: xfce4-panel ProcEnviron: - LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: - Segfault happened at: 0x7a695c _IceTransWrite+12: mov(%eax),%edx - PC (0x007a695c) ok - source (%eax) (0x0019) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! - destination %edx ok + Segfault happened at: 0x7a695c _IceTransWrite+12: mov(%eax),%edx + PC (0x007a695c) ok + source (%eax) (0x0019) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! + destination %edx ok SegvReason: reading NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: xfce4-panel StacktraceTop: - _IceTransWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 - _IceWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 - IceFlush () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 - SmcRequestSaveYourself () from /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 - logout_session () from /usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so.4 + _IceTransWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 + _IceWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 + IceFlush () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 + SmcRequestSaveYourself () from /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 + logout_session () from /usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so.4 Title: xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite() UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare -- Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568233] [NEW] Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xfce4-panel Argh! I hoped this field would have been filled out automatically. I tested Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) in LiveCD mode (no installation or thelike). When attempting to shut down xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite(). ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: xfce4-panel 4.6.3-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Apr 22 03:52:41 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xfce4-panel LiveMediaBuild: Xubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Release Candidate i386 (20100419) ProcCmdline: xfce4-panel ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x7a695c _IceTransWrite+12:mov(%eax),%edx PC (0x007a695c) ok source (%eax) (0x0019) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! destination %edx ok SegvReason: reading NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: xfce4-panel StacktraceTop: _IceTransWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 _IceWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 IceFlush () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 SmcRequestSaveYourself () from /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 logout_session () from /usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so.4 Title: xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite() UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Affects: xfce4-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash i386 lucid -- Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568233] Re: Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()
** Description changed: - Binary package hint: xfce4-panel - I tested Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) in LiveCD mode (no installation or thelike). When attempting to shut down xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite(). + + Whoever will be the triager I ask that person to set this bug report to + *high* and not medium since this directly affects the release of Xubuntu + and thus needs to be worked on. I relized that one or two similar bugs + exist for that package. So I ask to take my request into consideration, + please. + + + Binary package hint: xfce4-panel ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: xfce4-panel 4.6.3-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Apr 22 03:52:41 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xfce4-panel LiveMediaBuild: Xubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Release Candidate i386 (20100419) ProcCmdline: xfce4-panel ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x7a695c _IceTransWrite+12: mov(%eax),%edx PC (0x007a695c) ok source (%eax) (0x0019) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! destination %edx ok SegvReason: reading NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: xfce4-panel StacktraceTop: _IceTransWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 _IceWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 IceFlush () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 SmcRequestSaveYourself () from /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 logout_session () from /usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so.4 Title: xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite() UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare -- Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs