[Bug 1777070] Re: firefox plugin libwidevinecdm.so crashes due to apparmor denial

2022-05-21 Thread A. Denton
Solved it for me by editing /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox on XSE
(Debian- & Xubutnu 18.04 LTS-based distro):

  # per-user firefox configuration
  #...
  owner @{HOME}/.{firefox,mozilla}/**/gmp-widevinecdm/*/lib*so m,


That solved the problem when using Mz Firefox 100.0 (64-bit) and widevine 
4.10.2449.0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777070

Title:
  firefox plugin libwidevinecdm.so crashes due to apparmor denial

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1777070/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960285] [NEW] package openmpi-bin 4.1.0-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed openmpi-bin package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2

2022-02-07 Thread Carl Denton
Public bug reported:

Happened during an OS upgrade.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: openmpi-bin 4.1.0-10ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-99.112-generic 5.4.162
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-99-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
Date: Mon Feb  7 19:48:13 2022
DuplicateSignature:
 package:openmpi-bin:4.1.0-10ubuntu1
 Installing new version of config file /etc/openmpi/openmpi-mca-params.conf ...
 update-alternatives: error: /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/mpi corrupt: slave link 
same as main link /usr/bin/mpicc
 dpkg: error processing package openmpi-bin (--configure):
  installed openmpi-bin package post-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 2
ErrorMessage: installed openmpi-bin package post-installation script subprocess 
returned error exit status 2
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-30 (648 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20200203.1)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.9, Python 3.9.7, python3-minimal, 3.9.4-1build1
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.18-9
RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.20.9ubuntu2
 apt  2.3.9
SourcePackage: openmpi
Title: package openmpi-bin 4.1.0-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed 
openmpi-bin package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit 
status 2
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2022-02-08 (0 days ago)

** Affects: openmpi (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package impish need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960285

Title:
  package openmpi-bin 4.1.0-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed openmpi-bin package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openmpi/+bug/1960285/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1464064] Re: Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS

2019-11-30 Thread A. Denton
The only solution ATM is to check
https://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/3q53kc/list_of_ubuntu_repository_mirrors_available_over/
an chose a nearby mirror.

Then compare http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-
security/InRelease and your mirror, e.g. https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/dists
/bionic-security/InRelease (mirror of the FAU (university) located in
Germany) and make sure "Date:" in the top section of the InRelease file
is equivalent (not more off than 6 to 12 hrs) between the two files.


Then adjust your /etc/apt/sources.list e.g. like this:

## Main repository for Ubuntu distributions. This line was auto-added in
## 2018 to provide a fallback, in case no network mirror is available.
# deb cdrom:[Xubuntu 18.04.1 LTS _Bionic Beaver_ - Release amd64 (20180725)]/ 
bionic main restricted
# deb cdrom:[Xubuntu 18.04.1 LTS _Bionic Beaver_ - Release amd64 (20180725)]/ 
bionic universe
# deb cdrom:[Xubuntu 18.04.1 LTS _Bionic Beaver_ - Release amd64 (20180725)]/ 
bionic multiverse

## See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to
## newer versions of the distribution.
## Major bug fix updates are produced after the final release of the
## distribution.
deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic main restricted
deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic main restricted
deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates main restricted
deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates main restricted
deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security main restricted
deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security main restricted

## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as
## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes
## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features.
## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review
## or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-backports main restricted 
deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-backports universe multiverse

## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any
## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic universe
deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic universe
deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates universe
deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates universe
deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security universe
deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security universe

## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu 
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to 
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in 
## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu
## security team.
deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic multiverse
deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic multiverse
deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates multiverse
deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-updates multiverse
deb https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security multiverse
deb-src https://ftp.fau.de/ubuntu/ bionic-security multiverse

## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's
## 'partner' repository.
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the
## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users.
## It includes Adobe Flash, Google SDK and IBM Java.
#deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu bionic partner
#deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu bionic partner


Then run:
sudo apt-get check
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get clean
sudo apt-get autoclean
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo dpkg --purge `dpkg --get-selections | grep deinstall | cut -f1`
sudo apt-get check

Make sure `sudo lsof /var/lib/apt/lists/lock` does not output something
besides a warning of /run/user/1000/gvfs. If so terminate the offender
if possible and/or run `sudo dpkg --configure -a`.


That's it. All your APT updates will now run TLS-secured (HTTPS), -except- for 
your Launchpad PPA updates, located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. AFAIK their 
links cannot be transformed from HTTP to HTTPS yet.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464064

Title:
  Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1464064/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1774711] Re: excessive seccomp audit logs

2019-11-30 Thread A. Denton
Will the required pat set be backported to older kernel, such as Ubuntu
4.15.0-70.79-generic 4.15.18?

Will the patches be in 20.04 LTS (kernel >= 4.18), which is around the
corner?


NOTE:

Unfortunately with issue #1774711 the use of "auditd" has become
problematic on systems with SSDs, since systemd allows in-memory
configuration (Storage=volatile; SplitMode=none), but auditd does not
support such a complex configuration (write_logs = no; log_file =
/var/log/audit/audit.log).

That means with the excessive SECCOMP lines (i.e. tens/hundreds of
thousands a day) we cannot re-enable auditd (sudo systemctl start|enable
auditd.service) until this issue is resolved, UNLESS there is a way to
make auditd not to write logs to disk but continue to function properly.
We need auditd for enforcing audit.rules (complex ISO 27001, PCI-DSS,
etc. compliant rulesets) and statistics (sudo aureport (-n)), which
require log data stored (dmesg kernel bugger is insufficient for ISO
compliant store and analysis of events and stats).

Our tests show, that up to several hundred MiB of logs are written to
the SSDs per pay, which accumulates to approx 0.5 TiB over the course of
4 years. With in avg. 50% of the SSD cells occupied and given the
models, this translates to a slightly increased wear-out of our SSDs,
even when a good wear-leveling algorithm and background garbage
collector is in use (our desktop models: Samsung Enterprise SSD with
super capacitor mod. SM/PM863(a)).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774711

Title:
  excessive seccomp audit logs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1774711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1752091] Re: gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed

2019-11-30 Thread A. Denton
Hello TJ, your gvfs-package build on
https://launchpad.net/~tj/+archive/ubuntu/bugfixes seems to have
resolved the problem for me! Therefore, a 1000 thanks! :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752091

Title:
  gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion
  'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1752091/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1774711] Re: excessive seccomp audit logs

2019-06-11 Thread A. Denton
For the record:

My/our signature line is:
Ubuntu 4.15.0-50.54-generic 4.15.18

Messages look like this:
Jun 07 01:40:42 TDOG-ADM-AD-VM7 audit[25263]: SECCOMP auid=4294967295
uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4294967295 pid=25263 comm="chromium-browse"
exe="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser" sig=0 arch=c03e
syscall=257 compat=0 ip=0x7f658fa04db1 code=0x5

Jun 07 01:40:42 TDOG-ADM-AD-VM7 audit[25263]: SECCOMP auid=4294967295
uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4294967295 pid=25263 comm="chromium-browse"
exe="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser" sig=0 arch=c03e
syscall=257 compat=0 ip=0x7f658fa04db1 code=0x5

Jun 07 01:40:42 TDOG-ADM-AD-VM7 audit[25263]: SECCOMP auid=4294967295
uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4294967295 pid=25263 comm="chromium-browse"
exe="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser" sig=0 arch=c03e
syscall=257 compat=0 ip=0x7f658fa04db1 code=0x5

Jun 07 01:40:42 TDOG-ADM-AD-VM7 audit[25263]: SECCOMP auid=4294967295
uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4294967295 pid=25263 comm="chromium-browse"
exe="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser" sig=0 arch=c03e
syscall=257 compat=0 ip=0x7f658fa04db1 code=0x5

Jun 07 01:40:42 TDOG-ADM-AD-VM7 audit[25263]: SECCOMP auid=4294967295
uid=1000 gid=1000 ses=4294967295 pid=25263 comm="chromium-browse"
exe="/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser" sig=0 arch=c03e
syscall=257 compat=0 ip=0x7f658fa04db1 code=0x5

...

Precondition is that auditd.service is started.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774711

Title:
  excessive seccomp audit logs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1774711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1752091] Re: gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed

2019-06-06 Thread A. Denton
Yes Antonio (tonecas), this looks promising indeed.

Could the Ubuntu Developers please look in to
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/commit/d7e1397854f32e793b4f65d894908d67072dcb3f
and port this to "gvfs (Ubuntu)" and rebuild?

Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752091

Title:
  gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion
  'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1752091/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1464064] Re: Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS

2019-01-29 Thread A. Denton
With regards to CVE-2019-3462, my organization agrees with the statement
made on NSA QUANTUM:
https://twitter.com/TRONDELTA/status/1087810526539931649

On behalf of my intelligence organization, I think it would be much
better, if Canonical servers would require TLS >= 1.2 encryption (HSTS
and ECDHE preferred) and thus identify themselves properly, so
machines/users would be able make sure who they are talking/connecting
to.

We think that would definitely make MITM and MOTS attacks more
difficult. Personally, I'm aware of the existing signature scheme, i.e.
present package security. Nonetheless, it does not seem to address the
problem of transport security; especially the lack of identification.
Therefore, I simply consider the assertions of whydoesaptnotusehttps.com
as wrong.

There is also a research paper named "A Look In the Mirror: Attacks on
Package Managers"
(https://isis.poly.edu/~jcappos/papers/cappos_mirror_ccs_08.pdf), which
showed that both APT and YUM repositories are vulnerable to replay
attacks, in case the repository is accessed via HTTP (even with valid
GPG signatures used).

In addition to that, Launchpad bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1647467 showed, that
transport security sometimes may reduce the impact of known
vulnerabilities and exposures.

Given the present state of things, I agree, on behalf of the members of
my organization, that TLS should be optional, at least for a
transitional period of LTS (5) years. We strongly recommend the decision
makers at Canonical to act professionally on this and make a change
soon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464064

Title:
  Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1464064/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1647467] Re: InRelease file splitter treats getline() errors as EOF

2019-01-29 Thread A. Denton
> It allows for attacking a repository via MITM attacks, circumventing
the signature of the InRelease file.

> ("deb http://192.168.0.2:1337/debian/ jessie-updates main" or so).
[..] This simulates a MITM attack or compromised mirror.

That sounds like it matters, where that InRelease file comes from,
right? When I look into my /etc/apt/sources.list, I only see deb/dev-src
http://.archive.ubuntu.com/... entries.

I think it would be much better, if Canonical servers would require TLS
1.x encryption (STS preferred) and thusly identify themselves with a
proper cert, so machines/users can make sure (nation-state actors not
taken into account) who they're talking to.

I think that would definitely make MITM and MOTS attacks more difficult.
I'm aware of the signatures, i.e. present package security, though.
Nonetheless, they do not seem to address the problem of transport
security.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647467

Title:
  InRelease file splitter treats getline() errors as EOF

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1647467/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1635809] Re: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

2019-01-08 Thread A. Denton
Every time I log into Xubuntu's Xfce, using LightDM I can see the
following log lines in /var/log/lightdm/seat0-greeter.log

The configuration was not changed significantly, except for lightdm-gtk-
greeter-settings, in which I chose theme Adwaita-dark and icons
elementary-xfce-dark.


** Message: 22:15:21.895: Starting lightdm-gtk-greeter 2.0.5 (Mar 20 2018, 
09:53:31)
** Message: 22:15:21.896: [Configuration] Reading file: 
/usr/share/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf.d/01_ubuntu.conf
** Message: 22:15:21.896: [Configuration] Reading file: 
/usr/share/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf.d/30_xubuntu.conf
** Message: 22:15:21.896: [Configuration] Reading file: 
/etc/lightdm/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf

** (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): WARNING **: 22:15:22.155: [PIDs] Failed
to execute command: upstart

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:22.401: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.215: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.240: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.290: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.306: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.323: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.341: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.356: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.374: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.391: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.408: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.424: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.441: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.457: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.474: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.491: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.507: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.523: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.540: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.557: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.574: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.675: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.692: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING **: 22:15:30.708: Drawing a
gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size?
(node menubar owner GreeterMenuBar)

(lightdm-gtk-greeter:3030): Gtk-WARNING 

[Bug 1774711] Re: excessive seccomp audit logs

2019-01-02 Thread A. Denton
After some research I can now safely confirm this bug. However, the log
lines do not seem to be related to any rules in "/etc/audit/rules.d" or
AppArmor profiles loaded. %‑)

The only difference between the log lines in *this* bug report, my lines
and the ones mentioned on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507282 seems to be system-
specific configuration, e.g. SELinux.

Over the past 24 hours, I also had sometimes 100 lines at once in my log
when opening or reloading a web page, in a new tab in Firefox. Therefore
Firefox seems to be the only "offending" application at present.

I also cleared the /etc/audit/rules.d and uninstalled the AppArmor
extras packages (apparmor-profiles, apparmor-profiles-extra) with the
Firefox profiles in it. Unfortunately the logs lines still poured in.
Therefore I also changed the abstractions for Firefox
(/etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers) and commented out
everything Firefox related, with no avail.

The problem is somewhere deeper and not Firefox-specific. I hope Tyler
Hicks (tyhicks) is correct and the fixes mentioned will soon be
available. Due to the problem I generated several GiB of logs a day
which is not so good for my SSD (even with wear-leveling).

My temporary workaround is to stop auditd, since unlike
/etc/systemd/journald.conf there is no Storage=volatile option for
auditd. :-0  ',:-l  >:/

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1507282
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507282

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1117953
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117953

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774711

Title:
  excessive seccomp audit logs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1774711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1774711] Re: excessive seccomp audit logs

2019-01-02 Thread A. Denton
Oh in short my /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules looks like this:

-D
-b 8192
-f 1
-i
--backlog_wait_time 0
-w /etc/anacrontab -p w -k AU-FS01-0001
[some more -w `foo` -p w -k `bar` here ...]

Has someone here tried
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117953 / adding a "-a
task,never" to /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules? Is that a bit extendive?


However, 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/kernel/seccomp.c?id=326bee0286d7f6b0d780f5b75a35ea9fe489a802
 looks very promising!
-   /*
-* Let the audit subsystem decide if the action should be audited based
-* on whether the current task itself is being audited.
-*/
-   return audit_seccomp(syscall, signr, action);
+   audit_seccomp(syscall, signr, action);

Thanks Tyler! :×

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774711

Title:
  excessive seccomp audit logs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1774711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1752091] Re: gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed

2019-01-02 Thread A. Denton
I can confirm the problem on my system:


gvfsd-metadata[PID]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion 'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE 
(device)' failed
(hundrets of entries ...)


As a temporary workaround I killed (only) the gvfsd-metadata process (will 
auto-respawan, unless changed in systemd) and erased the local gfvs-metadata 
directory (will be recreated with a file in it):

$ sudo pkill gvfsd-metadata
$ rm -rf ~/.local/share/gvfs-metadata

After that the logs disappeared from my system.

Removing removing its binary /usr/libexec/gvfsd-metadata however is not
a good practice, since it may lock up your system.

As a better alternative I tried to change /usr/share/dbus-1/session.conf
like this (right before the  directive/tag):


  

  

and changed /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-metadata via:
$ sudo chmod 000 /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-metadata

Unfortunately though this led to further problems and a lock-up, not
allowing to open further applications like the Thunar file explorer:

systemd[PID]: gvfs-metadata.service: Failed to execute command: Permission 
denied
systemd[PID]: gvfs-metadata.service: Failed at step EXEC spawning 
/usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-metadata: Permission denied

Maybe just the D-Bus rule would have been enough?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752091

Title:
  gvfsd-metadata[1703]: g_udev_device_has_property: assertion
  'G_UDEV_IS_DEVICE (device)' failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1752091/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1309535] Re: Running without pam-kwallet installed issues a warning in auth.log

2019-01-02 Thread A. Denton
I can confirm the problem with `journalctl`:

Jan 03 01:05:13 tron lightdm[12730]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet.so): 
/lib/security/pam_kwallet.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or 
dire
Jan 03 01:05:13 tron lightdm[12730]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_kwallet.so
Jan 03 01:05:13 tron lightdm[12730]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet5.so): 
/lib/security/pam_kwallet5.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or 
di
Jan 03 01:05:13 tron lightdm[12730]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_kwallet5.so
Jan 03 01:05:14 tron lightdm[12841]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet.so): 
/lib/security/pam_kwallet.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or 
dire
Jan 03 01:05:14 tron lightdm[12841]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_kwallet.so
Jan 03 01:05:14 tron lightdm[12841]: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet5.so): 
/lib/security/pam_kwallet5.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or 
di
Jan 03 01:05:14 tron lightdm[12841]: PAM adding faulty module: pam_kwallet5.so

The lines were created during logins, i.e. initial logins or after
locking the screen (xflock4) and unlocking it again.

The workaround I used was to change /etc/pam.d/lightdm and /etc/pam.d
/lightdm-greeter and comment out (#) the following lines (in both
files):

#authoptionalpam_kwallet.so
#authoptionalpam_kwallet5.so
...
#session optionalpam_kwallet.so auto_start
#session optionalpam_kwallet5.so auto_start

So far the systemd log is clear of those loglines. A different
workaround would be to simply install  the KDE component.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309535

Title:
  Running without pam-kwallet installed issues a warning in auth.log

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1309535/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1513387] Re: spinning wheel when using bridged setup

2018-08-19 Thread A. Denton
Which version of the distribution does it affect, Peter? Also does it
happen during LiveCD usage or on an already installed system?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1513387

Title:
  spinning wheel when using bridged setup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1513387/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1406516] Re: Autostarted applications don't render correctly

2018-08-16 Thread A. Denton
Cannot confirm this on our 18.04 installations.

Btw. bug is:
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
Package: xfce4-session 4.11.0-1ubuntu1

therefore EOL.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406516

Title:
  Autostarted applications don't render correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-session/+bug/1406516/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1304914] Re: Session don't remember place on desktop when exit

2018-08-16 Thread A. Denton
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1371144 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371144

Seems to be the case for me too, as long as I use Xfce4 (since 2008).
Glad someone mentioned it. :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304914

Title:
  Session don't remember place on desktop when exit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-session/+bug/1304914/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1131044] Re: Shortcuts such as Ctrl+F9 set but are unresponsive

2018-08-15 Thread A. Denton
Um..
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: xfce-keyboard-shortcuts 4.10.0-1

I think this should be closed, since its an STS version, end of life
since 2014.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131044

Title:
  Shortcuts such as Ctrl+F9 set but are unresponsive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxfce4ui/+bug/1131044/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1713313] Re: Unable to launch pkexec'ed applications on Wayland session

2018-08-09 Thread A. Denton
Franck, I liked your post, because I think you addressed a serious
issue. As Joanna R. (Invisible Things Lab) pointed out repeatedly, X is
not secure by design.

However, I don't understand your question whether one should use
firewalld instead of ufw? Isn't that an entirely different matter?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713313

Title:
  Unable to launch pkexec'ed applications on Wayland session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/1713313/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1780933] Re: [SRU] xfce4-settings 4.12.4, New upstream microrelease

2018-07-12 Thread A. Denton
Ah, thanks for your explanation and clarification, Simon and Łukasz. It
now makes sense to me. :-) Wish you a pleasant weekend!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780933

Title:
  [SRU] xfce4-settings 4.12.4, New upstream microrelease

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-settings/+bug/1780933/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1780933] Re: [SRU] xfce4-settings 4.12.4, New upstream microrelease

2018-07-10 Thread A. Denton
"[..] and if you are member of the ~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe the
team." Huh? Wow, why does the bug bot say that? Doesn't sound too nice;
btw. if someone is a team member that may be for a reason, right?
*confused*

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780933

Title:
  [SRU] xfce4-settings 4.12.4, New upstream microrelease

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-settings/+bug/1780933/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 997153] Re: xfce4-panel does not show all windows if panel area to small

2018-07-03 Thread A. Denton
Both systems 11.10 and 12.04 are EOL. It was pointed out correctly, that
there have been several (eol) versions of Ubuntu since 2012. No wonder
there are 736594 open and 67280 unconfirmed bugs on launchpad.

By the way I cannot confirm this behavior on Xubutnu 14.04 LTS and 18.04
LTS.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997153

Title:
  xfce4-panel does not show all windows if panel area to small

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/997153/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1550898] Re: xfce4-terminal remembers only history of one tab when restoring saved session

2018-06-17 Thread A. Denton
** Summary changed:

- Remembers only history of one tab when restoring saved session
+ xfce4-terminal remembers only history of one tab when restoring saved session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550898

Title:
  xfce4-terminal remembers only history of one tab when restoring saved
  session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-terminal/+bug/1550898/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768793] Re: Tab title not set

2018-05-03 Thread A. Denton
Is this Roland B. from the Xfe file explorer project? I love the
software and use Xfe every day! :-]

Regarding the bug I think it must be a regeression, since its not
present in 14.04 LTS.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768793

Title:
  Tab title not set

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-terminal/+bug/1768793/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768528] Re: ugly lowres login icon

2018-05-03 Thread A. Denton
Package lightdm-gtk-greeter-setting seemed not to be available from the
selection menu though.

However, current sate is TRIAGED (wishlist) for package lubuntu-artwork
(Ubuntu), which seems appropriate.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768528

Title:
  ugly lowres login icon

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm-gtk-greeter/+bug/1768528/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768528] Re: ugly lowres login icon

2018-05-02 Thread A. Denton
Thanks Hadmut! Since lubuntu-icon-theme is not listed on Lauchpad (PPAs
not considered) I added lubuntu-artwork as an affected package.

You're right also; it comes out of the box after installation that way.
I can confirm that. Therefore it should be fixed.

** Also affects: lubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: lightdm-gtk-greeter

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768528

Title:
  ugly lowres login icon

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm-gtk-greeter/+bug/1768528/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768528] Re: ugly lowres login icon

2018-05-02 Thread A. Denton
Well, adding a different distribution resulted in:

Oops!
Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad.
We’ve recorded what happened, and we’ll fix it as soon as possible. Apologies 
for the inconvenience.

(Error ID: OOPS-5ac38be1f3c1ceca3e245935663fd246)


That's not helpful either.

Simon, please be so kind and add the correct package or distro so the
problem can be fixed. We saw the problem in Lubuntu 18.04 LTS, with the
DEFAULT user icon on the initial login screen. It is of poor quality
indeed; thus the default user icon should be replaced and a package
update and respun ISOs provided when possible.

** Also affects: lightdm-gtk-greeter
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768528

Title:
  ugly lowres login icon

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm-gtk-greeter/+bug/1768528/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768528] Re: ugly lowres login icon

2018-05-02 Thread A. Denton
Hadmut, would you please execute:
sudo dpkg-query -S 
to determine the exact package name where the image file resides? Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768528

Title:
  ugly lowres login icon

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm-gtk-greeter/+bug/1768528/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1573995] Re: I just upgraded to 16.04 and I'm getting a AppArmor Message AppArmor Message Profile:usr?sbin/dnsmasq Operation: connect Name: run/dbus/system_bus_socket Denied:wr Logfile: /var/log/

2018-04-28 Thread A. Denton
Looks trivial though... The AppArmor profile may need an entry like
"/var/log/kern.log rw,".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573995

Title:
  I just upgraded to 16.04  and I'm getting a AppArmor Message AppArmor
  Message Profile:usr?sbin/dnsmasq Operation: connect Name:
  run/dbus/system_bus_socket Denied:wr Logfile: /var/log/kern.log
  DebuggingApparmor" for Ubuntu and when I try and enter my encription
  phrase it says something like no shell. Also, when I try and check for
  updates I am told I'm up to date ? Please let me know how I can debug
  AppArmor ? Randy Adamson adamsonran...@gmail.com Thanks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1573995/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1754150] Re: OEM installation test case doesn't follow screen sequence

2018-04-26 Thread A. Denton
The problem was confirmed and documented on iso.qa.ubuntu.com on 2018-04-26.
see: 
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/389/builds/171062/testcases/1305/results/

** Changed in: ubuntu-manual-tests
   Status: Opinion => Confirmed

** Also affects: boot (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: boot (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754150

Title:
  OEM installation test case doesn't follow screen sequence

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bug/1754150/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 292794] Re: VirtualBox virtual machines are frozen after suspend-resume

2018-04-23 Thread A. Denton
Yes, Ubuntu QA Website (ubuntuqa) reported that the bug was reported.
However its not *exactly* the same bug. The environment is similar and
the description matches, except that the VM freeze happens during
suspend (black screen w/ cursor in the upper left corner) and *not*
during resume. Killing of VirtualBox processes was not necessary.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292794

Title:
  VirtualBox virtual machines are frozen after suspend-resume

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ose/+bug/292794/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1740289] Re: print_req_error: critical target error, dev sr0, sector 2097136

2018-04-22 Thread A. Denton
It's not exactly the same, but I see the following during reboot, when
testing Xubuntu 18.04 daily ISO (2018-04-21), on VirtualBox 4.3
installed on a trusty system.

[  118.XX] print_req_error: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 1178984
[  118.XX] print_req_error: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 1177462

References:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/current/
https://www.google.com/search?q=launchpad+print_req_error%3A+I%2FO+error%2C+dev+sr0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1740289

Title:
  print_req_error: critical target error, dev sr0, sector 2097136

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1740289/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1741609] Re: linux: 3.13.0-139.188 -proposed tracker

2018-01-11 Thread A. Denton
I found the following thread, which explains some things. I'll post it
here in case someone else was looking for an answer.

https://askubuntu.com/questions/991874/how-to-disable-page-table-
isolation-to-regain-performance-lost-due-to-intel-cpu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741609

Title:
  linux: 3.13.0-139.188 -proposed tracker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1741609/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1741609] Re: linux: 3.13.0-139.188 -proposed tracker

2018-01-10 Thread A. Denton
> - kaiser: add "nokaiser" boot option, using ALTERNATIVE

O.k. for clarification; does GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="nokaiser" in
/etc/default/grub disable kaiser at boot time then?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741609

Title:
  linux: 3.13.0-139.188 -proposed tracker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1741609/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1726478] [NEW] Netplan not creating .network file under certain conditions

2017-10-23 Thread James Denton
Public bug reported:

OS: Ubuntu 17.10

Here's the scenario:

network:
  version: 2
  ethernets:
ens160:
  addresses: [10.50.0.9/24]
  gateway4: 10.50.0.1
  nameservers:
addresses: [8.8.8.8,8.8.4.4]
  vlans:
ens160.100:
  id: 100
  link: ens160
ens160.200:
  id: 200
  link: ens160
ens160.300:
  id: 300
  link: ens160
  bridges:
br-mgmt:
  interfaces: [ens160.100]
  addresses: [192.168.100.1/24]
br-overlay:
  interfaces: [ens160.200]
  addresses: [192.168.200.1/24]
br-storage:
  interfaces: [ens160.300]

In this configuration, a 'netplan apply' applies the following
configuration:

root@ubuntu:~# brctl show
bridge name bridge id   STP enabled interfaces
br-mgmt 8000.7282c779e298   no  ens160.100
br-overlay  8000.ce8884059e7b   no  ens160.200
br-storage  8000.b6fc84976f4f   no  ens160.300

root@ubuntu:~# ip a
1: lo:  mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group 
default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: ens160:  mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group 
default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:50:56:a8:92:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.50.0.9/24 brd 10.50.0.255 scope global ens160
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fea8:9285/64 scope link
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: br-overlay:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state 
UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether ce:88:84:05:9e:7b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.200.1/24 brd 192.168.200.255 scope global br-overlay
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::cc88:84ff:fe05:9e7b/64 scope link
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
5: br-mgmt:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP 
group default qlen 1000
link/ether 72:82:c7:79:e2:98 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.100.1/24 brd 192.168.100.255 scope global br-mgmt
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::7082:c7ff:fe79:e298/64 scope link
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
6: ens160.200@ens160:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue 
master br-overlay state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:50:56:a8:92:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
7: ens160.100@ens160:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue 
master br-mgmt state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:50:56:a8:92:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
8: ens160.300@ens160:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue 
master br-storage state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:50:56:a8:92:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
9: br-storage:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group 
default qlen 1000
link/ether b6:fc:84:97:6f:4f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

root@ubuntu:~# ls -l /run/systemd/network
total 48
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  34 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-br-mgmt.netdev
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  57 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-br-mgmt.network
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  37 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-br-overlay.netdev
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  60 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-br-overlay.network
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  37 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-br-storage.netdev
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  50 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.100.netdev
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  89 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.100.network
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  50 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.200.netdev
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  92 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.200.network
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  50 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.300.netdev
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  92 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.300.network
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 142 Oct 23 16:09 10-netplan-ens160.network

Here's the problem: In our environment, there's no need to have an IP
address on a bridge, and this has been reflected in the yaml for the br-
storage interface. Without an IP address assigned via dhcp: true or
addresses: [x.x.x.x/x], the br-storage interface is configured in a DOWN
state and won't pass traffic. I can set the interface UP with iproute2
and it will pass traffic as expected.

With ifupdown, we were able to bring up the br-storage interface at boot
with the following config:

auto br-storage
iface br-storage inet manual

During troubleshooting, I found that without specifying an address in
the yaml, netplan is not creating the respective .network file for the
interface in /run/systemd/network. I created a file named '10-netplan-
br-storage.network' with the following contents:

[Match]
Name=br-storage

[Network]

Restarted systemd-networkd with the following:

systemctl restart systemd-networkd

As a result, the br-storage interface came up and bridged traffic as

[Bug 1425974] Re: SSH on instance does'nt return the shell

2015-04-30 Thread James Denton
This may be an MTU issue. If you are able to console to the instance,
try dropping the MTU of the interface to 1450. If it works, option 26
can be passed via DHCP. You may find some helpful info at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1322799.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425974

Title:
  SSH on instance does'nt return the shell

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1425974/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

2015-04-19 Thread A. Denton
Quote by r0lf: The NTP code has seen numerous security vulnerabilities
and we have to assume that ntpdate is not receiving the same scrutiny
anymore when compared to NTPd.

Sorry r0lf, but that's laughable. Do you really want people to run a
fully featured (your wording: vulnerable) NTP daemon just to do s.th.
like this (ntpdate -u HOSTNAME /var/log/messages 21) one a day
within a /etc/cron.hourly/ntp?

Don't get me wrong -- I agree with you on the upstream-part of your
statement, but I disagree when it comes to bloat systems unnecessarily.
Once OS used to be simple, only containing things which their operators
needed. Why force them into running daemons the don't really have demand
for? I think ntpd -qg is the only option, although far from perfect.

https://twitter.com/TRONDELTA/status/546138511284658177

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583994

Title:
  Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/583994/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 583994] Re: Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

2015-04-19 Thread A. Denton
Quote by r0lf: The NTP code has seen numerous security vulnerabilities
and we have to assume that ntpdate is not receiving the same scrutiny
anymore when compared to NTPd.

Sorry r0lf, but that's laughable. Do you really want people to run a
fully featured (your wording: vulnerable) NTP daemon just to do s.th.
like this (ntpdate -u HOSTNAME /var/log/messages 21) one a day
within a /etc/cron.hourly/ntp?

Don't get me wrong -- I agree with you on the upstream-part of your
statement, but I disagree when it comes to bloat systems unnecessarily.
Once OS used to be simple, only containing things which their operators
needed. Why force them into running daemons the don't really have demand
for? I think ntpd -qg is the only option, although far from perfect.

https://twitter.com/TRONDELTA/status/546138511284658177

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583994

Title:
  Consider replacing ntpdate calls by 'ntpd -g'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/583994/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1415340] [NEW] lvconvert segmentation fault on merge

2015-01-27 Thread John Denton
Public bug reported:

1: System information

root@saturn:~# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS
Release:14.04

2: Package information

root@saturn:~# apt-cache policy lvm2
lvm2:
  Installed: 2.02.98-6ubuntu2
  Candidate: 2.02.98-6ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 2.02.98-6ubuntu2 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
root@saturn:~# 

3. Expected behavior:
 lvconvert --merge should not segfault after merge is successful.

4. Actual behavior:
root@saturn:~# mount /dev/saturn/rings.two /mnt
root@saturn:~# touch /mnt/foo
root@saturn:~# umount /mnt
root@saturn:~# valgrind lvconvert --merge /dev/saturn/rings.two
==23772== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==23772== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==23772== Using Valgrind-3.10.0.SVN and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==23772== Command: lvconvert --merge /dev/saturn/rings.two
==23772== 
==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1024 in syscall close()
==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1025 in syscall close()
==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1026 in syscall close()
==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1027 in syscall close()
==23772==Use --log-fd=number to select an alternative log fd.
==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1028 in syscall close()
==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1029 in syscall close()
==23772== Warning: invalid file descriptor 1030 in syscall close()
  Merging of volume rings.two started.
  Internal error: Reserved memory (126324736) not enough: used 126881792. 
Increase activation/reserved_memory?
  rings: Merged: 97.0%
==23772== Invalid read of size 8
==23772==at 0x481A79: lv_is_merging_cow (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x4997DD: dev_manager_snapshot_percent (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x43AF2B: lv_snapshot_percent (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x417110: ??? (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x427C3F: ??? (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x4281BC: poll_daemon (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x41853B: lvconvert_poll (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x41862A: ??? (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x41A9D2: ??? (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x42EF21: process_each_lv_in_vg (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x4304B4: process_each_lv (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x41B3DC: lvconvert (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==  Address 0x28 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==23772== 
==23772== 
==23772== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV): 
dumping core
==23772==  Access not within mapped region at address 0x28
==23772==at 0x481A79: lv_is_merging_cow (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x4997DD: dev_manager_snapshot_percent (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x43AF2B: lv_snapshot_percent (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x417110: ??? (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x427C3F: ??? (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x4281BC: poll_daemon (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x41853B: lvconvert_poll (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x41862A: ??? (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x41A9D2: ??? (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x42EF21: process_each_lv_in_vg (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x4304B4: process_each_lv (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==by 0x41B3DC: lvconvert (in /sbin/lvm)
==23772==  If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==23772==  overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==23772==  possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==23772==  main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==23772==  The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==23772== 
==23772== HEAP SUMMARY:
==23772== in use at exit: 586,786 bytes in 712 blocks
==23772==   total heap usage: 9,622 allocs, 8,910 frees, 19,027,414 bytes 
allocated
==23772== 
==23772== LEAK SUMMARY:
==23772==definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23772==indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23772==  possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23772==still reachable: 586,786 bytes in 712 blocks
==23772== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23772== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==23772== 
==23772== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==23772== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Merge was successful:

root@saturn:~# mount /dev/saturn/rings /mnt
root@saturn:~# ls /mnt -la
total 17
drwxr-xr-x  3 root root  1024 Jan 28 00:01 .
drwxr-xr-x 22 root root  4096 Jan 17 06:36 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 0 Jan 28 00:01 foo
drwx--  2 root root 12288 Jan 28 00:00 lost+found


Replication steps (For me, anyways):

1) Create empty lv (lv0)
2) create snapshot of lv (lv1)
3) Create filesystem on lv0
4) Create snapshot of lv0 (lv2)
5) mount lv2 and use touch to create a file
6) unmount lv2
7) lvconvert --merge /dev/vol00/lv2

** Affects: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: Core file from valgrind/lvconvert in initial 

[Bug 947664] Re: Unpacking linux-headers unbelievably slow in Lubuntu Precise (Beta 1)

2013-09-06 Thread A. Denton
I can confirm this bug.

The following operations took about 15 minutes.

sudo apt-get install linux-generic linux-headers-generic 
linux-headers-generic-lts-quantal linux-image-generic 
linux-image-generic-lts-quantal linux-tools linux-tools-lts-quantal
[...]
Unpacking linux-headers-3.2.0-53 (from 
.../linux-headers-3.2.0-53_3.2.0-53.81_all.deb) ...
Unpacking linux-headers-3.2.0-53-generic (from 
.../linux-headers-3.2.0-53-generic_3.2.0-53.81_amd64.deb) ...

Unpacking linux-headers-3.5.0-40 (from 
.../linux-headers-3.5.0-40_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking linux-headers-3.5.0-40-generic (from 
.../linux-headers-3.5.0-40-generic_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_amd64.deb) ...
[...]


Meanwhile: 

:~$ sudo ps aux | grep 'dpkg'
root  1243  1.0  1.2 119988 96836 pts/6Ds+  11:56   0:04 /usr/bin/dpkg 
--status-fd 71 --unpack --auto-deconfigure 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.2.0-53-generic_3.2.0-53.81_amd64.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-40-generic_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_amd64.deb
 /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-generic_3.2.0.53.63_amd64.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-generic_3.2.0.53.63_amd64.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-53_3.2.0-53.81_all.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.2.0-53-generic_3.2.0-53.81_amd64.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-generic_3.2.0.53.63_amd64.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.5.0-40_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_all.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-3.5.0-40-generic_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_amd64.deb
 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-generic-lts-quantal_3.5.0.40.46_amd64.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-generic-lts-quantal_3.5.0.40.46_amd64.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-tools-3.2.0-53_3.2.0-53.81_am
 d64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-tools_3.2.0.53.63_amd64.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-tools-3.5.0-40_3.5.0-40.62~precise1_amd64.deb 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-tools-lts-quantal_3.5.0.40.46_amd64.deb

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947664

Title:
  Unpacking linux-headers unbelievably slow in Lubuntu Precise (Beta 1)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/947664/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 999910] Re: [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard)

2013-05-30 Thread A. Denton
Looks promising. So far I installed 3.5.0-31 on two X230 and it runs
flawlessly. On some of my T430 its not yet perfect. Sometimes the
devices hang during boot sequence and docking/undocking is not yet
stable. However display errors in Unity are far less.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10

Title:
  [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/10/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 492734] Re: ntpd profile in Xubuntu 8.04 LTS is unconfined on boot

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
The current status to this problem/bug on one of the last non-migrated machines 
here is:
0 processes are unconfined but have a profile defined.

However Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS is EOL (end of life) and therefore someone
close this bug, please.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492734

Title:
  ntpd profile in Xubuntu 8.04 LTS is unconfined on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/492734/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 61619] Re: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
Yeah, probably the meta package really depends on one of the two ntp
packages. I guess its just not important enough at this point.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619

Title:
  ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/61619/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 288496] Re: winbind postinst returned error exit status 1 (daemon failed to start)

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
The content of comment #10 from 2009-12-29 is obsolete. It works
flawlessly right now. Also the distribution and package are EOL. I do
not have the powers to change this bug to WONT FIX state. Someone here
at Launchpad either give that permission to me or mark it as such,
please.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288496

Title:
  winbind postinst returned error exit status 1 (daemon failed to start)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/288496/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 999910] Re: [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard)

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
Adam, thank you for that update. Yet I can indeed confirm a significant
improvement for 3.2.0-43 and -44 (same +sec fixes). Guess some intel
stuff was added in -43 (as I heard). I also recall something from the
changelogs. With regards to 3.5.0-xx I hope things were backported. So
fare these with = 3.5.0-30 seem to run stable as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10

Title:
  [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/10/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 492734] Re: ntpd profile in Xubuntu 8.04 LTS is unconfined on boot

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
The current status to this problem/bug on one of the last non-migrated machines 
here is:
0 processes are unconfined but have a profile defined.

However Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS is EOL (end of life) and therefore someone
close this bug, please.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492734

Title:
  ntpd profile in Xubuntu 8.04 LTS is unconfined on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/492734/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 505995] Re: java crashed with signal 5 in _XError()

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
The distribution is EOL (end of life) and the software version is also
obsolete. Therefore I recommend to change this bug to WONT FIX now since
this annot and won't be reproduced ever according to the original bug
report description. I think in case this is still an issue someone will
file a new bug with up-2-date information and debug information.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/505995

Title:
  java crashed with signal 5 in _XError()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libx11/+bug/505995/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
The bugs name should be altered. I think Microsoft is just one player in
this game. Have you realized some things changed since the 90's? Just
imagine... Oracle took over Sun, Apple released OS 10 (X) and BSD is a
powerful and usable OS . :-]

Seriously guys I think Microsoft is not the biggest problem we have and
neither is Apple or some other company. The biggest problem right now is
'us'. I think we have a problem with Linux, with quality and with the
direction in which things are going. Yes, I say we have a problem with
quality and 100k+ bugs here. We have a problem with users still making a
valid point in saying Ubuntu is to hard to install and to yet not usable
in the same way and everywhere like the systems of our competitors.

All that is not Microsoft's fault. And even a major market share for a
dinosaur like them is not a problem in the first place. However it
matters whether our quality is better or not. Bill Gates was wrong when
he replied to Jobs in the 80's that it doesn't matter. It does matter –
you can see it yourself!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

Title:
  Microsoft has a majority market share

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/clubdistro/+bug/1/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 247746] Re: winbind should be downgraded to Recommends

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
I agree with commenter #6, Etienne. I think this bug is not specific to
any given distribution release number and therefore not obsolete yet.
Can the appropriate owner/person in charge (S. R.) alter the package and
set the dependency to recommends, please?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247746

Title:
  winbind should be downgraded to Recommends

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/247746/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61619] Re: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
Yeah, probably the meta package really depends on one of the two ntp
packages. I guess its just not important enough at this point.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619

Title:
  ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/61619/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 288496] Re: winbind postinst returned error exit status 1 (daemon failed to start)

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
The content of comment #10 from 2009-12-29 is obsolete. It works
flawlessly right now. Also the distribution and package are EOL. I do
not have the powers to change this bug to WONT FIX state. Someone here
at Launchpad either give that permission to me or mark it as such,
please.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288496

Title:
  winbind postinst returned error exit status 1 (daemon failed to start)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/288496/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 117514] Re: seahorse does not synchronize keys with keyserver

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
The bug is still assigned to Ubuntu Desktop Bugs team and gnome-bugs
#401655 in status confirmed. Can someone there provide us with an update
with regards to the issue/bug?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117514

Title:
  seahorse does not synchronize keys with keyserver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/seahorse/+bug/117514/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 148454] Re: console-kit-daemon spawns too many threads

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
See #101 and #128, please. I suggested you to do nothing at all. The
memory consumption has nothing to do with the bugs name console-kit-
daemon spawns too many threads (comment #107, #108, #110, #116) in my
opinion. And threads are not expensive when it comes to context
changes. Also some people here seem not to understand the concept of
virtual memory. The developer from freedesktop.org pointed that out
AFIR.

My opinion is still: do nothing at all. Neither is it worth the time nor
is this bug from 2007-10-03 still an issue. The old UNIX system V init
system is not the latest technology and superseded mostly although not
exclusively by systemd. Additionally the latest stable kernel version is
now 3.9.3 and in Ubuntu 10.04.x LTS its 3.2.0-xx LTS kernel (until 2016)
or via LES (EnablementStack) its 3.5.0 and 3.8.0 from quantal and raring
respectively.

I do not have the powers to change this bug to WONT FIX state. Someone
here at Launchpad either give that permission to me or mark it as such,
please.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148454

Title:
  console-kit-daemon spawns too many threads

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/consolekit/+bug/148454/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1073114] Re: Shopping Lens Does Not Respect User Privacy

2013-05-25 Thread A. Denton
The bug is unassigned since no one whats to have the responsibility I
assume. Honestly I came to Xubuntu and Canonical (to a certain extend)
years ago since I was fed up with M$ and their broken system. At present
however I'm in the middle of a migration to FreeBSD -- also because of
bugs like this one. By the way I agree with the last commenter, Jeroen
Hoek. I don't have the time to read every newsletter or announcement but
at least some of them. I never received an explanation either and
probably never will. In my opinion its O.K. for a company like Canonical
to make profit like Red Hat and others do but its not O.K. to do it like
M$ or companies like these.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073114

Title:
  Shopping Lens Does Not Respect User Privacy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunity/+bug/1073114/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61619] Re: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative

2013-05-15 Thread A. Denton
Nonetheless nice to see some progress with regards to this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619

Title:
  ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/61619/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 61619] Re: ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative

2013-05-15 Thread A. Denton
Nonetheless nice to see some progress with regards to this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619

Title:
  ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/61619/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 999910] Re: [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard)

2013-05-04 Thread A. Denton
I experienced the freezes and problems during boot as well as
docking/undocking with several Lenovo X230 (new devices) in our
computing lab. I checked all the hardware so far (board, CPU, RAM) with
the appropriate diagnostic tools so far (Lenovo Diagnostics, Intel CPU
Diagnostics and Memtest86+). so I can confirm the hardware works fine.

Further I migrated two systems from Ubuntu 12.04.0 LTS (with upgrades
applied) to Xubuntu 12.04.2 LTS (with upgrades applied) and realized a
major improvement. Sometimes a system freezes (completely, no NUM lock
works, no Video repost, completely frozen) At present I see three things
to test:

- Try the Ubuntu LTSEnablementStack
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack) which upgrades
Kernels from 3.2.0.x to 3.5.x.

- Try the prorietary NVidia graphics driver for GNU/Linux 64 bit which
is however not in the repositories and this must be managed manualy from
that time on.

- Try to completely disable: compositing in Xfce, power savings in Xfce
and with Kernel parameter and adjust EFI settings if applicable.

I think it is a combination of Kernel, X11 and GPU driver (nouveau)
which makes the system freeze. Since Ubuntu has Unity this GUI pulls
several packages as a dependency which I can not overlook. It seems like
Xfce is better with regards to this issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10

Title:
  [IVB]12.04 64 bit System freezes (mouse, keyboard)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/10/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 572155] Re: Splash image wrong size when two displays connected

2013-04-27 Thread A. Denton
I have a Lenovo 230 notebook with an LCD attached to the docking station
and an external 24 screen connected to the very same station. As long
as the 24 screen is offline (switched of) the Plymouth boot screen is
correctly scaled at 1366x768 in the notebooks LCD -- which is the
primary screen. But in case the system is booted with the 24 monitor
connected and enabled (switched on) -- which is the secondary screen --
the LCD shows the boot screen displaced in the upper left corner. About
30% of the primary LCD screen are black. The boot screen on the 24
screen is in a wrong resolution at that time and not the recommended
1920x1200.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572155

Title:
  Splash image wrong size when two displays connected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/572155/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1097042] Re: Risk of filesystem corruption with ext3 in lucid

2013-01-22 Thread A. Denton
Yes, but it's not in hardy server which is supported until April 2013
AFAIK.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097042

Title:
  Risk of filesystem corruption with ext3 in lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1097042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1073114] Re: Shopping Lens Does Not Respect User Privacy

2012-12-11 Thread A. Denton
I read R. Stallmans article Ubuntu Spyware: What to Do?  as well as
the reply On Richard Stallman and Ubuntu by Jono B. Therefore I can
say that Jono plain wrong. On the one hand he shares the goals of the
FSF and points out that he shares the very same goals as well and on the
other hand he apolizizes for pushing it by implementing this technology
into recent Ubuntu releases. In my opionion Ubuntu became what it is
today (among other reasons) due to the fact it did not include spyware.
Yes, it is spayware and about the same Microsoft, Apple and some others
implemented in the past.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073114

Title:
  Shopping Lens Does Not Respect User Privacy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunity/+bug/1073114/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1022012] Re: (CVE-2012-3374) pidgin-2.10.5: MXit buffer overflow

2012-07-12 Thread A. Denton
Thanks for your input, Tyler. My colleagues and I came to the same
cnclusion yesterday when we read the CERT messages and digged a bit
deeper regarding the MXit protocol. We run several different versions of
Pidgin from 2.4.1 to 2.10.6. Fortunately none of the packages was
shipped with a MXit plugin. I tried to build a Pidgin 2.6.6 package
which runs on Ubuntu 8.04 to 12.04, but faild to apply some patches to
the code.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022012

Title:
  (CVE-2012-3374) pidgin-2.10.5: MXit buffer overflow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pidgin/+bug/1022012/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1022012] Re: (CVE-2012-3374) pidgin-2.10.5: MXit buffer overflow

2012-07-10 Thread A. Denton
Is there currently a workaround for this flaw? Upgrade on my site was
delayed due to corporate procedures. Can I disable that MXit thing
somehow?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022012

Title:
  (CVE-2012-3374) pidgin-2.10.5: MXit buffer overflow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pidgin/+bug/1022012/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 993088] [NEW] package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126

2012-05-02 Thread Anthony Denton
Public bug reported:

Error reported on startup just after login

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue May  1 16:43:56 2012
ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script 
returned error exit status 126
SourcePackage: samba4
Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: 
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 126
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-01 (0 days ago)

** Affects: samba4 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993088

Title:
  package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 126

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/993088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 993088] Re: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126

2012-05-02 Thread Anthony Denton
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993088

Title:
  package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 126

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/993088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 805492] [NEW] [ICH4 - Intel ICH5, playback] No sound at all

2011-07-04 Thread Phil Denton
Public bug reported:

When I go to sound preferences the test of my device (standard analog
out) works fine on both channels but no applications are able to play
sound.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: pulseaudio 1:0.9.22+stable-queue-24-g67d18-0ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23.
Architecture: i386
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  phil   1496 F pulseaudio
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'ICH5'/'Intel ICH5 with AD1981B at irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Analog Devices AD1981B'
   Components   : 'AC97a:41445374'
   Controls  : 34
   Simple ctrls  : 23
Date: Mon Jul  4 09:52:26 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: pulseaudio
Symptom: audio
Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:ICH5 successful
Symptom_Card: Internal Audio - Intel ICH5
Symptom_DevicesInUse: 1496
Symptom_PulsePlaybackTest: PulseAudio playback test failed
Symptom_Type: No sound at all
Title: [ICH4 - Intel ICH5, playback] No sound at all
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 04/09/2004
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 2001
dmi.board.name: P4SD-VL
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTek Computer Inc.
dmi.board.version: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: P122B03B8108B89578E9
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.version: US
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2001:bd04/09/2004:svnSonyCorporation:pnVGC-RA710G(UC):pvr28478433:rvnASUSTekComputerInc.:rnP4SD-VL:rvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrUS:
dmi.product.name: VGC-RA710G(UC)
dmi.product.version: 28478433
dmi.sys.vendor: Sony Corporation

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805492

Title:
  [ICH4 - Intel ICH5, playback] No sound at all

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/805492/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 805492] Re: [ICH4 - Intel ICH5, playback] No sound at all

2011-07-04 Thread Phil Denton
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805492

Title:
  [ICH4 - Intel ICH5, playback] No sound at all

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/805492/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 792993] Re: package man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)

2011-06-04 Thread Denton Edwards
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792993

Title:
  package man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation
  fault)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 792993] [NEW] package man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)

2011-06-04 Thread Denton Edwards
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: man-db

Freshly installed system on a Sony Vaio laptop, problem detected upon
first reboot

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-32.62-generic 2.6.32.38+drm33.16
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-32-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jun  4 19:31:51 2011
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal 
(Segmentation fault)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20110211.1)
SourcePackage: man-db
Title: package man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)

** Affects: man-db (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792993

Title:
  package man-db 2.5.7-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation
  fault)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 792140] [NEW] package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139

2011-06-02 Thread Denton Edwards
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

When trying to do any upgrades in 11.04, I got a Samba4 error.  This
error occurred when I tried to remove Samba from my system

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Jun  2 19:28:18 2011
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit 
status 139
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-26 (7 days ago)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792140

Title:
  package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status
  139

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 792140] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139

2011-06-02 Thread Denton Edwards
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792140

Title:
  package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status
  139

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 792140] [NEW] package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139

2011-06-02 Thread Denton Edwards
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

When trying to do any upgrades in 11.04, I got a Samba4 error.  This
error occurred when I tried to remove Samba from my system

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Jun  2 19:28:18 2011
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit 
status 139
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-26 (7 days ago)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792140

Title:
  package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status
  139

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 792140] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 139

2011-06-02 Thread Denton Edwards
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792140

Title:
  package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status
  139

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 773660] Re: Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/poo

2011-05-01 Thread Gavin Denton
Thank you all for your help. I've now reinstalled

On 1 May 2011 23:06, Jean-Baptiste Lallement jean-bapti...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 This is caused by the mirror being out of sync. I'm closing this report
 because it's not a bug with Ubuntu.

 ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
       Status: New = Invalid

 --
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773660

 Title:
  Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x
  /xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403  Forbidden Failed to
  fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-75dpi
  /xfonts-75dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403  Forbidden

 Status in “update-manager” package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

 Bug description:
  Binary package hint: update-manager

  Failed to fetch 
 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb
  403  Forbidden
  Failed to fetch 
 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-75dpi/xfonts-75dpi_1.0.3_all.deb
  403  Forbidden

 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/773660/+subscribe


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773660

Title:
  Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x
  /xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403  Forbidden Failed to
  fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-75dpi
  /xfonts-75dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403  Forbidden

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 773660] [NEW] Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403 Forbidden Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/

2011-04-29 Thread Gavin Denton
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: update-manager

Failed to fetch 
http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb
 403  Forbidden
Failed to fetch 
http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-75dpi/xfonts-75dpi_1.0.3_all.deb
 403  Forbidden

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773660

Title:
  Failed to fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x
  /xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403  Forbidden Failed to
  fetch http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/x/xfonts-75dpi
  /xfonts-75dpi_1.0.3_all.deb 403  Forbidden

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 553100] Re: Audacious initialization assertion failed on icon change

2010-09-26 Thread A. Denton
Sorry, but I can't since I'm running Xubuntu 8.04 LTS.

-- 
Audacious initialization assertion failed on icon change
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553100
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 48407] Re: unmounting broken, mounting for normal users

2010-06-22 Thread A. Denton
I tried to follow the Workflow described on [L1] but yet without
success. On the one hand I don't know which OS bug #48407 refers to.
Maybe it's Ubuntu 6.06 which has been discontinued except for the rarely
used server distibution (until June 2011). On the other hand there is no
demand for a fix I guess and so one shoudl rther check whether Hardy or
Lucid suffer from the same problem.

[L1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow

-- 
unmounting broken, mounting for normal users
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 66518] Re: Startup Notification broken

2010-06-22 Thread A. Denton
I don't suffer from that regresion in Xubuntu 8.04 LTS (hardy) since I'm
using Xfce I guess.

On a side note, it would be much better if ubuntu used something more
like vista's UAC. E.g. instead of entering a password you just push
Allow or Deny. The reason for this is that entering your password is
annoying, and is open to phishing style attacks. With just a simple
allow or deny it would be secure against phishing attacks. Implementing
it securely would not be an easy task. -- Is a good thin IMKO and I
will put it to Ubuntu brainstorm. ;-)

-- 
Startup Notification broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 576642] [NEW] XScreensaver causes Lubuntu 10.04 LTS to hang in LiveCD mode using sun VirtualBox

2010-05-06 Thread A. Denton
Public bug reported:

When running the latest build as of 06.05.2010 (Lubuntu 10.04 LTS) using
Sun VirtualBox on Xubuntu 8.04 LTS the following problem occoured.

After a few minutes inactivity the screensaver started which I
interrupted quickly. When opening the xscreensaver configuration from
the Applications panel a window was drawn with the list of available
screensavers on the left and an live view of the current selected
screensaver on the right (as usual). The problem however was, that after
a few seconds the VM became totally busy when displaying the current
screensaver (default, with yellow snowflakes or something). I was even
unable to close the xscreensaver config window or choose the option »no
screensaver« in the upper left corner. As a result I had to switch to
tty1 on my host machine and sigterm (15) the Sun VirtualBox process
instance. For clarification I actually ran xscreensavers on Xubuntu
10.04 LTS in the past when testing ISO (qa.ubuntu.com) and my computer
is also fast enough (3100 MIPS (AMD K7/M10 @ 1,53Ghz)).

As a temporary fix I recommend the packagers/remasterers at the Lubuntu
team to disable screensavers by default and select either none or »blank
screen« as default. Besides the aforementioned implications this
behavior would also better fit to a less resource consuming
distribution. Screensavers cause much problems and there is also
blueprint on Lauchpad regarding that matter [L1].

[L1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/screensaver-review

Note: I ask the Lubuntu team to provide MD5/SHA1 sums at theri publicaly
available download repositories. Unfortunately I was unable to confirm
the image integrity with MD5, but the LiveCD integrity check returned an
error in one file.

** Affects: lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: iso-testing

-- 
XScreensaver causes Lubuntu 10.04 LTS to hang in LiveCD mode using sun 
VirtualBox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576642
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 575260] Re: package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ub untu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welc hes auch in Paket xine-plugin ist

2010-05-05 Thread A. Denton
The problem dissapeared after I manually purged the »sun-java6-plugin«
package yesterday and reinstalled it today. I assume the error (Try to
overwrite »/usr/lib/firefox«, which is also in package »xine-plugin«.)
is not present anymore. Thanks to whoever fixed it! :-)

-- 
package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ubuntu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: 
Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket 
xine-plugin ist
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 575260] [NEW] package sun-java6-plugin 6-17 -0ubuntu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche , »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket xine-plugin ist

2010-05-04 Thread A. Denton
Public bug reported:

Wen I tried to upgrade the system via sudo apt-get upgrade the error occoured.
System is Xubuntu 8.04.4 LTS.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue May  4 18:18:51 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ErrorMessage: Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in 
Paket xine-plugin ist
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Package: sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ubuntu1.8.04
PackageArchitecture: i386
SourcePackage: sun-java6
Title: package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ubuntu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: 
Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket 
xine-plugin ist
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-27-generic i686

** Affects: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package

-- 
package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ubuntu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: 
Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket 
xine-plugin ist
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 575260] Re: package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ub untu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welc hes auch in Paket xine-plugin ist

2010-05-04 Thread A. Denton

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47803410/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47803411/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package sun-java6-plugin 6-17-0ubuntu1.8.04 failed to install/upgrade: 
Versuche, »/usr/lib/firefox« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket 
xine-plugin ist
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 574182] Re: Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)

2010-05-03 Thread A. Denton
Sebastian, in case this bug has already been reported/is a dupblicate I
ask you to link it with that bug so everyone can follow.

-- 
Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574182
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574199] [NEW] Thunar stops opening directories in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)

2010-05-03 Thread A. Denton
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: thunar

For this bug report [1] and [2] applies. After installation of the
mentioned Xubuntu ISO I started configuring the system the way I prefer
it simply for the purpose of testing. I have to admit that I noticed the
bug I report here even in the build of 2001-04-19.

After configuration of Thunar usage is no problem until a few
directories were traversed. It does not seem to matter which dirs are
accessed, in which recursion depth or thelike. Thunar simply pevents me
from opening a further directory after a short period of time. From then
on doubleclicking on a directory has no effect at all. Besides that
haven't yet noticed anything else.

The thunar version is the current one.


[1]
Source: iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/4172
Xubuntu Desktop i386 / Xubuntu 10.04 LTS (20100429)
Direct download : 
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20100429/lucid-desktop-i386.iso
MD5Sum : OK

[2]
Hardware (VM): AMD Athlon K7/M10 1.53GHz, 448MB RAM, ATI RV350 AS [Radeon 9550] 
w/16MB
Resolution 800x600; no Sun VirtualBox guest additions installed

** Affects: thunar (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: iso-testing

-- 
Thunar stops opening directories in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574199] Re: Thunar stops opening directories in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)

2010-05-03 Thread A. Denton

** Attachment added: Thunar configuration file
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47463733/thunarrc

-- 
Thunar stops opening directories in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 480094] Re: xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()

2010-05-02 Thread A. Denton
It also happened when testing [L1]. I marked the bug as serious in
iso.qa.ubuntu.com since this happened the third time to me now and I
think it is a severe drawback for Xubuntu users.

[L1] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20100429/lucid-
desktop-i386.iso

-- 
xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 552000] Re: xubuntu logo in plymouth splash screen looks like it has spider webs in it

2010-05-02 Thread A. Denton
It's still not fixed as of 3rd May 2010. Is there maybe another problem?

-- 
xubuntu logo in plymouth splash screen looks like it has spider webs in it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552000
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574162] [NEW] gnome-search-tool warning regarding non-standard escape code

2010-05-02 Thread A. Denton
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-utils

Whenever running gome-search-tool on my Xubuntu 8.04.4 LTS installation
I get lots of the following messages in my ~/.xsession-errors:

** (gnome-search-tool:15805): WARNING **: gsearchtool_strdup_strftime
does not support non-standard escape code %k


(translated from german to english)
gnome-utils:
  installed:2.20.0.1-1ubuntu5
  possible packages:2.20.0.1-1ubuntu5
  version table:
 *** 2.20.0.1-1ubuntu5 0
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

I expect this to stop since it floods the aforementioned file and
exceeds aprox. 180kib which stops logging to this file then.

** Affects: gnome-utils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
gnome-search-tool warning regarding non-standard escape code
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574162
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574182] [NEW] Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)

2010-05-02 Thread A. Denton
Public bug reported:

As already mentioned I ran the latest available build [1]. After
installation using VirtualBox [2] the login screen (GDM) looks a bit
malformed. More specifically the bottom bar has a misplaced icon on the
lower right and the font is cut off on the left side. The screenshot
makes it easy to confirm this.


[1]
Source: iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/4172
Xubuntu Desktop i386 / Xubuntu 10.04 LTS (20100429)
Direct download : 
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20100429/lucid-desktop-i386.iso
MD5Sum : OK

[2]
Hardware (VM): AMD Athlon K7/M10 1.53GHz, 448MB RAM, ATI RV350 AS [Radeon 9550] 
w/16MB
Resolution 800x600; no Sun VirtualBox guest additions installed

** Affects: xubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: iso-testing

-- 
Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574182
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574182] Re: Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)

2010-05-02 Thread A. Denton

** Attachment added: Xubuntu GDM Screenshot
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47453424/xfce_login_oddly_shaped.png

-- 
Login screen (GDM) has odd bar in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100429)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574182
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 275561] Re: gpaint has no undo funtionality

2010-04-28 Thread A. Denton
I'm using Xubuntu 8.04 LTS GNU/Linux (2.6.24-27-generic / i686) and have
gpaint v0.3.3 installed. Without undo/redo functionality the program is
hard to use. I wonder how the authors could actually use it.

I also ask the triager of this bug to set importance at least to medium.
Regarding my Xubuntu installation I have to uninstall gpaint now due to
the sverity/impact of this bug.

-- 
gpaint has no undo funtionality
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275561
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 568218] Re: Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)

2010-04-27 Thread A. Denton
Ok I think you can mark this bug as invalid since I can't reproduce
this. I either made a mistake or there is no problem anymore. I can
adjust mouse speed even in LiveCD mode when configuring ImExPS/2
Generic Explorer Mouse.

-- 
Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 505677] Re: Xubuntu needs a Ubiquity slideshow

2010-04-24 Thread A. Denton
Great someone already adressed that issue! I wanna mention though, that
the installation is still a bit *boring* for the average user. It all
started really nice with an explaination about existing games and stuff
like that, but from then on only that help information (see attached
image) was shown to me (after about 50% installation progress).
Honestly... I had no chance but to read the same help text a 100 times.
:-(

** Attachment added: Ubiquity at 94% with few changes
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45248311/ubuquity_info.png

-- 
Xubuntu needs a Ubiquity slideshow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/505677
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 568218] Re: Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)

2010-04-24 Thread A. Denton
Things have changed and I ask people to confirm this if possible. After
installation (on HDD) of Xubuntu (20100419) changes took effect when
configuring Xfce as follows:

Accelleration from 2,0 (default) to 1,0 and threshold from 4 to 8. I
applied these settings to all (3) predefined profiles. I noticed the
effect first after configuring ImExPS/2 Generic Explorer Mouse.

Next I'll do is to recheck these settings. In case it was my mistake
I'll let you know.

-- 
Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 539027] Re: end_request: I/O error rebooting at end of install Lucid

2010-04-24 Thread A. Denton
* I can confirm this the same way charlie-tca did when testing. I used  Xubuntu 
daily (20100419), casper 1.236.
* After clicking on restart now Xfce shuts down and you drop to the tty where 
you see daemons stopping, etc.
* In the end (before the actual reboot) I receive dozens of these I/O errors 
(screenshot attached).
* Installation from LiveCD was not affected any further.
* My hardware is custum (VM: 1,53 Ghz AMD K7/gen10; 448Mb DDR-SD-RAM (in VM); 
ATI RV350 AS [Radeon 9550] w/ 256Mib)
* Could this rather be a problem in plymouth?

** Attachment added: squashfs_read_error.png
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45253847/squashfs_read_error.png

-- 
end_request: I/O error rebooting at end of install Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 568218] [NEW] Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)

2010-04-21 Thread A. Denton
Public bug reported:

As already mentioned I ran the latest available build [1] and followed
the guidelines mentioned on [2]. Though everything worked out fine I
realized that changed mouse settings in LiveCD-mode did not take effect
(screenshot of area of interest attached).

I expect mouse settings to work even when running in LiveCD mode because
the mouse speed is much to hight to be producteve. People with
disabilities would probably locked out and thus be unable to install or
use Xubuntu right from the start.

Unfortunately I cannot attach the /var/log/Xorg.0.log here since I can
establish but not browse FTP connections with Gigolo. I think the
problem is related with thunar somehow. Wenever I open that filebrowser
it prevents me from acessing directories after a while. So I'm unable to
browse to /var/log with Thunar for e.g. In case someone can provide me
with imformation how to transfer files off Virtualbox to my system I
will provide you with whatever you need.

[1]
Source: iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/4002
Xubuntu Desktop i386 / Xubuntu 10.04 LTS (20100419)
Direct download : 
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20100419/lucid-desktop-i386.iso
MD5Sum : 9686959ea68ae9d5c008fc7f42406f1e

[2]
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Testing/TestingInfo/Short

** Affects: xubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: mouse xfce4.6 xubuntu

-- 
Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 568218] Re: Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)

2010-04-21 Thread A. Denton

** Attachment added: Screenshot
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44998731/screenshot_vm_20100419_mouse.png

-- 
Xfce 4.6 mouse configuration has no effect in Xubuntu 10.04 (20100419)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 568233] Re: Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()

2010-04-21 Thread A. Denton

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000140/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000142/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000143/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000145/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000146/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000147/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000148/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45000149/XsessionErrors.txt

-- 
Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in 
_IceTransWrite()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568233
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 568233] Re: Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()

2010-04-21 Thread A. Denton
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: xfce4-panel
  
- Argh! I hoped this field would have been filled out automatically.
- 
- I tested Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) in LiveCD mode (no installation or
- thelike).
- 
- When attempting to shut down xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in
- _IceTransWrite().
+ I tested Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) in LiveCD mode (no installation or 
thelike).
+ When attempting to shut down xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in 
_IceTransWrite().
  
  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: xfce4-panel 4.6.3-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Apr 22 03:52:41 2010
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xfce4-panel
  LiveMediaBuild: Xubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Release Candidate i386 (20100419)
  ProcCmdline: xfce4-panel
  ProcEnviron:
-  LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SegvAnalysis:
-  Segfault happened at: 0x7a695c _IceTransWrite+12:  mov(%eax),%edx
-  PC (0x007a695c) ok
-  source (%eax) (0x0019) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
-  destination %edx ok
+  Segfault happened at: 0x7a695c _IceTransWrite+12:  mov(%eax),%edx
+  PC (0x007a695c) ok
+  source (%eax) (0x0019) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
+  destination %edx ok
  SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: xfce4-panel
  StacktraceTop:
-  _IceTransWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
-  _IceWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
-  IceFlush () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
-  SmcRequestSaveYourself () from /usr/lib/libSM.so.6
-  logout_session () from /usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so.4
+  _IceTransWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
+  _IceWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
+  IceFlush () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
+  SmcRequestSaveYourself () from /usr/lib/libSM.so.6
+  logout_session () from /usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so.4
  Title: xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()
  UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

-- 
Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in 
_IceTransWrite()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568233
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 568233] [NEW] Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()

2010-04-21 Thread A. Denton
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xfce4-panel

Argh! I hoped this field would have been filled out automatically.

I tested Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) in LiveCD mode (no installation or
thelike).

When attempting to shut down xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in
_IceTransWrite().

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: xfce4-panel 4.6.3-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Apr 22 03:52:41 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xfce4-panel
LiveMediaBuild: Xubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Release Candidate i386 (20100419)
ProcCmdline: xfce4-panel
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7a695c _IceTransWrite+12:mov(%eax),%edx
 PC (0x007a695c) ok
 source (%eax) (0x0019) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
 destination %edx ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: xfce4-panel
StacktraceTop:
 _IceTransWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
 _IceWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
 IceFlush () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
 SmcRequestSaveYourself () from /usr/lib/libSM.so.6
 logout_session () from /usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so.4
Title: xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

** Affects: xfce4-panel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-crash i386 lucid

-- 
Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in 
_IceTransWrite()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568233
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 568233] Re: Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()

2010-04-21 Thread A. Denton
** Description changed:

- Binary package hint: xfce4-panel
- 
  I tested Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) in LiveCD mode (no installation or 
thelike).
  When attempting to shut down xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in 
_IceTransWrite().
+ 
+ Whoever will be the triager I ask that person to set this bug report to
+ *high* and not medium since this directly affects the release of Xubuntu
+ and thus needs to be worked on. I relized that one or two similar bugs
+ exist for that package. So I ask to take my request into consideration,
+ please.
+ 
+ 
+ Binary package hint: xfce4-panel
  
  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: xfce4-panel 4.6.3-1ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Thu Apr 22 03:52:41 2010
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xfce4-panel
  LiveMediaBuild: Xubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Release Candidate i386 (20100419)
  ProcCmdline: xfce4-panel
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0x7a695c _IceTransWrite+12:  mov(%eax),%edx
   PC (0x007a695c) ok
   source (%eax) (0x0019) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
   destination %edx ok
  SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: xfce4-panel
  StacktraceTop:
   _IceTransWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
   _IceWrite () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
   IceFlush () from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
   SmcRequestSaveYourself () from /usr/lib/libSM.so.6
   logout_session () from /usr/lib/libxfcegui4.so.4
  Title: xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransWrite()
  UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

-- 
Xubuntu 10.04 RC (20100419) / xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in 
_IceTransWrite()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568233
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   >