What is the correct PPA to have the newest landscape clients until this
is fixed?
I found ppa:landscape/production which is very outdated, and
ppa:landscape/trunk which does have version 23.10 but it seems odd that
a customer needs to use "trunk" and not "production". Also I was
avoiding pointing
The problem is that a swapfile in btrfs cannot have CoW activated on the
file, and cannot be compressed. Also, you should not leave the file in
the root filesystem (even if it would work with the above settings)
because it will make snapshots of /@ messy.
If you manually do this, it will work:
-
Public bug reported:
If you try to import a custom image in maas cli it fails with a cryptic error
which turns out to be because of a non-existing architecture.
Upon further investigation, it seems that if you delete all images of a
specific architecture the architecture itself disappears and
I noticed my usb audio started crackling on the last few days. It does
not happen on internal audio, just on my Xenyx 302 USB external mixer. I
followed the suggestion of reverting to old kernel above and it seems to
have fixed the issue.
5.13.0-37 has issues, 5.13.0-35 is good.
Please let me
Changing to confirmed because it affects at least 3 people.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966432
Title:
audio crackling on usb sound card
To manage notifications about this bug go
Confirmed, everything working as it should. LB is online/active, all resources
working well (health checsks, backends, etc.). Even adding a FIP and accessing
from "outside".
I'm closing as invalid, and keeping the other bug.
** Changed in: octavia (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
I created a new bug for FCE -->
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cpe-foundation/+bug/1950678
I could not just add it here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350
Title:
octavia LBs
Ok, I was taking a deeper look at corey's output (where it shows LB is active)
(comment #8) and wanted to try that "ovn" driver that appears on his output
(not directly related to this problem, but anyway).
Then I saw the documentation saying that if you deploy octavia with OVN
you should get
I removed all configs (flavor, flavorprofile, availabilityzone,
availabilityzoneprofile) and just created a very simple loadbalancer passing
only name and network options.
It still get ACTIVE/OFFLINE.
ubuntu@app1maas001p:~/2021-09-20-OP-212891-xxx-Prod1$ openstack loadbalancer
list
I'm taking a step back and trying to just create a simple loadbalancer
without any resources and get that ONLINE, like you can see here (from
coreycb):
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NRdsvPrRhB/
Instead, I get this:
https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/FGcwHkgZ27/
The amphora image in these tests was
https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/rW8b88MRVj/
Also found these errors in /var/log/octavia/octavia-worker.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350
Title:
octavia LBs always offline
https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/dnq9sBZMKn/
Found SQL error in /var/log/octavia/octavia-health-manager.log about
health monitor. I have very similar messagens on the 3 octavia units.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I have no errors when installing octavia, nothing unusual on the juju logs.
I'm searching for specific backend health logs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350
Title:
octavia LBs
https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/fBwxNVPVB7/
This is the whole loadbalancer creation log. You can see all backends
are "offline" at the end (and they stay offline).
https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/yZVCb2Py63/
This is all the security groups on the system, including the ones
created byu
I have tried to add ALL possible roles related to octavia to the admin user and
it did not improve the situation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350
Title:
octavia LBs always
Public bug reported:
After switching from Wallaby to Xena, the same procedure to create a simple
loadbalancer is no longer working (both from dashboard and from CLI). All
backends appear as offline, as if the monitor tests were failing, although the
service is accessible.
** Affects: octavia
Subscribed field-critical.
I'll add more information as soon as possible, but I'm available for
debugging if someone can work on this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350
Title:
I changed the tag for "verification-needed-focal" to "verification-done-
focal", but I would like to add that the version of the kernel listed on
the "focal" fix above is 5.8, when in fact the GA kernel for focal is
5.4.
Kernel 5.8 has been an HWE kernel for focal in the past but even then
it's
I can confirm that this is fixed for focal GA kernel. Kernel 5.4.0-89
still have the problem and kernel 5.4.0-90 is fixed, I can see all nics
on the card now.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Sure! I cannot redeploy right now because I'm using the cloud to chase another
bug, bug will do asap and report back.
Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945707
Title:
Just a comment on wallaby-proposed packages, I installed those on all
ovn-related units and don't see errors about RBAC anymore, and I also didn't
notice any other collateral effect.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Just upgrading the packages (from focal-wallaby-proposed) did not help.
I upgraded on all ovn-chassis (even the octavia ones), all ovn-central,
all ovn-chassis-gateway. I also deleted the LB and recreated completely.
On a separate note, when I try to run "ovn-sbctl find connection" the
command
Ok, I'll try to update from proposed and test. Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475
Title:
RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table
To manage notifications
I seem to be having this problem on a focal / wallaby deployment, although I
don't have that exact message (about prohibit update of port_binding), I only
have:
root@srv2dell001p:/var/log/ovn# grep -i perm ovn-controller.log
Ok, I should have waited for the firmware upgrade before posting this.
They seemed to be pretty outdated, went from FW v10.2.377.29 to
v11.4.1186.4
And... drum roll. it worked. Fixed the problem.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You
Just for clarification:
There are 2 DHCP servers on this segment (one in HA, actually). Both
respond, and I can see both Offers in the bridge. One coming straight
from the host and another one form a different host via the uplink.
Neither of them reach the vm (which should receive both and choose
I'm also seeing a lot of "[263380.267602] br-bond0: received packet on bond0
with own address as source address (addr:4a:e1:8f:bc:32:3d, vlan:0)" in dmesg
when I add the ip manually (and it works -- but gives me these messages).
I don't think how a loop could be in play here, with only 1 uplink
I tested setting ageing to 0 (suggested at some internet forums):
brctl setageing br-bond0 0
No improvement.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
Title:
DHCP Offer not traversing
I tried the exact same things on different environments and it always works. It
seems to be something related to this hardware, because it happens exactly the
same on 3 machines.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "acpidump.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530577/+files/acpidump.txt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
apport information
** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530576/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530575/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530574/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530573/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530572/+files/ProcEnviron.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530571/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530570/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb-v.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530569/+files/Lsusb-v.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530567/+files/Lsusb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb-t.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530568/+files/Lsusb-t.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci-vt.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530566/+files/Lspci-vt.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530565/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
Title:
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected focal uec-images
** Description changed:
I'm facing a problem in a customer where a VM plugged to a bridge will not
get DHCP responses from dhcp server running on the host or externally (the
bridge has level 2 external uplink).
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530564/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This is the netplan config:
network:
ethernets:
eno1: {}
enp22s0f1: {}
bonds:
bond0:
# vlan 3801 - OAM is native (no tag)
interfaces:
- eno1
- enp22s0f1
parameters:
primary: eno1
mode: active-backup
mii-monitor-interval: 1s
This is the bridge info:
ubuntu@app2maas001p:~$ brctl show br-bond0
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br-bond08000.723488506c2c no bond0
tap864c7e54
ubuntu@app2maas001p:~$
Iptables is empty with all ACCEPT policy.
ebtables is empty with all ACCEPT policy.
ufw is inactive.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028
Title:
DHCP Offer not traversing linux
Public bug reported:
I'm facing a problem in a customer where a VM plugged to a bridge will not get
DHCP responses from dhcp server running on the host or externally (the bridge
has level 2 external uplink).
Relevant information:
- focal with latest GA kernel (5.4.0-88)
- tested with HWE
I'm seeing this in focal kernel 5.4.0-88. Is this expected? Do I have to
switch to the hwe kernel pointed above to fix this?
The laptop has been stable for a long time and then suddenly started
having this exact symptom a few days ago. I'm wondering if this was
introduced in latest ga kernels for
This seems to be the upstream bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214297
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #214297
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214297
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Works with focal kernel 5.4.0-80
Broken with focal kernel 5.4.0-88
On a Dell R720 with the BCM57800 based 1/10 Gigabit Integrated Network
cards Kernel 5.11.22-3 causes half of the network interfaces to
disappear specifically the 1gb ports. Commands like "ip link show" and
My guess. “/home/ion420/Desktop/.goutputstream-0LONR0” is a temporary
file, probably the editor is saving a new file to then move over the
original one when you save. The extension notices the new file but when
trying to get more info about it, it's gone (race condition). It
probably does not
Public bug reported:
After I upgraded from Eoan to Focal, a strange behavior started with the
desktop icons.
I have a few .txt files in ~/Desktop dir which appear as icons on the
desktop. After some time some of them disappear (not all of them). They
still exist, I can navigate to them using
Just to confirm, in a kvm client machine, going to the configs, VirtIO
Disk 1, Advanced Options, Serial Number and typing anything there works
around the problem. Just tested it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Today, doing a simple apt update + apt upgrade in Eoan:
Setting up systemd (242-7ubuntu3.8) ...
[/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/speech-dispatcher.conf:1] Line references path below
legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/speech-dispatcher →
/run/speech-dispatcher; please update the tmpfiles.d/
Have been trying to reproduce it, nothing so far:
https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/Wq7bnBS8cN/
There must be some other variable involved.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878376
Ubuntu Disco Dingo, gnome 3.32, happens only on wayland.
When you start gnome-terminal, it instead spawn a separate icon which is
named gnome-terminal-server and has no icon (actually the missing icon
icon).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Humm, actually this happens only when using byobu and the terminal is started
through it's icon, if I start the terminal directly it works ok. So this may be
related to byobu and not the terminal itsef. Sorry for the noise.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I'm hitting this bug in a client installation, Bionic / Queens. Just spent a
few hours debugging and in the end came to exactly the same tests and
conclusion.
Using DPDK, using bond for dpdk, using isolated metadata (as this is
provider only networks). I *can* send data to the netns up to 9000
I have seen this on bionic, then on cosmic and now on disco. Type
password and it takes 5 to 6 seconds to give you the desktop.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774188
Title:
Just got the same bug again in Disco Dingo.
Setting up systemd (240-6ubuntu5.1) ...
[/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/speech-dispatcher.conf:1] Line references path below
legacy directory /var/run/, updating
Public bug reported:
Just updated cosmic and got:
Setting up systemd (239-7ubuntu10.8) ...
[/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/speech-dispatcher.conf:1] Line references path below
legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/speech-dispatcher →
/run/speech-dispatcher; please update the tmpfiles.d/ drop-in
Now that I'm thinking of it, it may be nfs only, indeed. In the last
days I have downloaded many ISO files and I do not remember the machine
freezing not even once while downloading. Then, after, when copying
these files to my server (nfs mounted), the locks ocurred. I will do
more tests to
I am pretty sure they are two different bugs. At one side, people with
ndiswrapper problem are having kernel panics, on the other side my
machine is hanging without using wireless at all.
How do you know which comments are from ubuntu/canonical staff? I see
many users discussing the bugs but it's
Hi all. I can confirm this bug.
Fresh install of Gutsy 64 in a AMD X2 4400+ / Asus motherboard with
builtin Gigabit ethernet (nvidia chipset). No wireless involved, just
gigabit ethernet. My home is mounted over nfs, so is many directories on
the machine.
I dist-upgraded just after installing,
65 matches
Mail list logo
