[Bug 1107909] Re: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client
The problem has been fixed, also see the original report. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101684] Re: Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally
First I tried this for a few day with Debian Wheezy beta RC, now again with XUbuntu, doing frequent reboots, no hanging boot process occured anymore. The issue has been fixed. I would like to say thank-you to the person who did it, just marked this as 'Fix Released'. ** Changed in: installation-report (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101684 Title: Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1101684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1051604] Re: cpufreqd is misconfigured and does not work at all by default
Until today I thought, that the patch worked for me, it really did probably, and I am not so enthusiastic about tuning CPU-frequency scaling manually in userspace. Really average users should not be bothered with this kind of stuff, everything should work out of the box everywhere. But in some cases, when CPUs are too energy-hungry and have exaggerated maximum-frequencies, it makes sense probably, to limit those to 80%, because energy-saving is higher this way than the resulting loss in performance. So status set to 'Opinion'. Is this OK? ** Changed in: cpufreqd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051604 Title: cpufreqd is misconfigured and does not work at all by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpufreqd/+bug/1051604/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] Re: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] Re: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client
The first image shows the screen with 'Resources controlled by [Auto(ESCD)]' BIOS-setting, the second with '[Manual]', both appeared at warm reboot. ** Attachment added: "one more screenshot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+attachment/3505734/+files/new-2-s-shot.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] Re: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client
** Attachment added: "new screenshot showing still persistent hang at warm reboot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+attachment/3505592/+files/new-s-shot.jpg ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream regression -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504568/+files/UdevLog.txt ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504567/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] PulseList.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504566/+files/PulseList.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504565/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504564/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504563/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] PciMultimedia.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504562/+files/PciMultimedia.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504559/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] Lsusb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504561/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] Lspci.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504560/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504558/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] Card0.Amixer.values.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504557/+files/Card0.Amixer.values.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] ArecordDevices.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504556/+files/ArecordDevices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] AlsaDevices.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504555/+files/AlsaDevices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] Re: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
The issue was already reported earlier here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1101684
The broblems occured first with Debian Wheezy beta and the 3.2-pae-kernel
there. See:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694344
If you carefully read these two reports, then you already know
everything.
Can you please see if this issue can be fixed with some quirk ?
Obviously the problem is a regression and did not occur with earlier
linux-versions, because the device is a native linux-device and
originally has 'eLuxNG', the latest version downloadable at fujitsu-
support-website is from the year 2007, so most probably it has a
2.6-series kernel.
It is _very_ improbable that the problem is due to a hardware-failure,
because I have two of these thin clients here and it happened with both
of them.
demon@fsc-s400:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Release: 12.04
demon@fsc-s400:~$ apt-cache policy linux-image-3.5.0-22-generic
linux-image-3.5.0-22-generic:
Installiert: 3.5.0-22.34~precise1
Kandidat:3.5.0-22.34~precise1
Versionstabelle:
*** 3.5.0-22.34~precise1 0
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main i386
Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security/main i386
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: linux-image-3.5.0-22-generic 3.5.0-22.34~precise1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-22.34~precise1-generic 3.5.7.2
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-22-generic i686
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.25.
AplayDevices:
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: SI7012 [SiS SI7012], device 0: Intel ICH [SiS SI7012]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.1
Architecture: i386
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: demon 1527 F xfce4-volumed
demon 1540 F pulseaudio
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'SI7012'/'SiS SI7012 with ALC203 at irq 5'
Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC203 rev 0'
Components : 'AC97a:414c4770'
Controls : 33
Simple ctrls : 21
CurrentDmesg:
Error: command ['sh', '-c', 'dmesg | comm -13 --nocheck-order /var/log/dmesg
-'] failed with exit code 1: comm: /var/log/dmesg: Permission denied
dmesg: write failed: Broken pipe
Date: Mon Jan 28 14:28:33 2013
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386
(20120822.1)
IwConfig:
lono wireless extensions.
eth0 no wireless extensions.
MachineType: FUJITSU SIEMENS FUTRO S400
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=de_DE:en
TERM=xterm
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcFB:
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-22-generic
root=UUID=8a3dc07e-5617-4c7d-aeba-e048ce3e171b ro
RfKill:
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
WifiSyslog:
dmi.bios.date: 05/14/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies, LTD
dmi.bios.version: 6.00PG Rev. 4.00.0Q
dmi.board.name: TR53A0
dmi.board.vendor: TECO Electric and Machinery Co., Ltd.
dmi.board.version: REV:1.5
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: TECO Electric and Machinery Co., Ltd.
dmi.chassis.version: S2054S
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologies,LTD:bvr6.00PGRev.4.00.0Q:bd05/14/2008:svnFUJITSUSIEMENS:pnFUTROS400:pvr:rvnTECOElectricandMachineryCo.,Ltd.:rnTR53A0:rvrREV1.5:cvnTECOElectricandMachineryCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvrS2054S:
dmi.product.name: FUTRO S400
dmi.sys.vendor: FUJITSU SIEMENS
+ ---
+ AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.25.
+ AplayDevices:
+ List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
+ card 0: SI7012 [SiS SI7012], device 0: Intel ICH [SiS SI7012]
+Subdevices: 1/1
+Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
+ ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.1
+ Architecture: i386
+ AudioDevicesInUse:
+ USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
+ /dev/snd/controlC0: demon 2951 F xfce4-volumed
+ demon 2959 F pulseaudio
+ CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
+ Card0.Amixer.info:
+ Card hw:0 'SI7012'/'SiS SI7012 with ALC203 at irq 5'
+Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC203 rev 0'
+Components : 'AC97a:414c4770'
+Controls : 33
+Simple ctrls : 21
+ CurrentDmesg:
+ Error: command ['sh', '-c', 'dmesg | comm -13 --nocheck-order /var/log/dmesg
-'] failed with exit code 1: comm: /var/log/dmesg: Permission denied
+ dmesg: write failed: Broken pipe
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
+ InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386
(20120822.1)
+ IwConfig:
[Bug 1107909] Re: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client
** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+attachment/3504462/+files/lspci-vnvn.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107909] [NEW] Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client
Public bug reported: The issue was already reported earlier here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1101684 The broblems occured first with Debian Wheezy beta and the 3.2-pae-kernel there. See: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694344 If you carefully read these two reports, then you already know everything. Can you please see if this issue can be fixed with some quirk ? Obviously the problem is a regression and did not occur with earlier linux-versions, because the device is a native linux-device and originally has 'eLuxNG', the latest version downloadable at fujitsu- support-website is from the year 2007, so most probably it has a 2.6-series kernel. It is _very_ improbable that the problem is due to a hardware-failure, because I have two of these thin clients here and it happened with both of them. demon@fsc-s400:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Release:12.04 demon@fsc-s400:~$ apt-cache policy linux-image-3.5.0-22-generic linux-image-3.5.0-22-generic: Installiert: 3.5.0-22.34~precise1 Kandidat:3.5.0-22.34~precise1 Versionstabelle: *** 3.5.0-22.34~precise1 0 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main i386 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: linux-image-3.5.0-22-generic 3.5.0-22.34~precise1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-22.34~precise1-generic 3.5.7.2 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-22-generic i686 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.25. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: SI7012 [SiS SI7012], device 0: Intel ICH [SiS SI7012] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.1 Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: demon 1527 F xfce4-volumed demon 1540 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'SI7012'/'SiS SI7012 with ALC203 at irq 5' Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC203 rev 0' Components : 'AC97a:414c4770' Controls : 33 Simple ctrls : 21 CurrentDmesg: Error: command ['sh', '-c', 'dmesg | comm -13 --nocheck-order /var/log/dmesg -'] failed with exit code 1: comm: /var/log/dmesg: Permission denied dmesg: write failed: Broken pipe Date: Mon Jan 28 14:28:33 2013 InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120822.1) IwConfig: lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. MachineType: FUJITSU SIEMENS FUTRO S400 MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcFB: ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-22-generic root=UUID=8a3dc07e-5617-4c7d-aeba-e048ce3e171b ro RfKill: SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) WifiSyslog: dmi.bios.date: 05/14/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies, LTD dmi.bios.version: 6.00PG Rev. 4.00.0Q dmi.board.name: TR53A0 dmi.board.vendor: TECO Electric and Machinery Co., Ltd. dmi.board.version: REV:1.5 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: TECO Electric and Machinery Co., Ltd. dmi.chassis.version: S2054S dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologies,LTD:bvr6.00PGRev.4.00.0Q:bd05/14/2008:svnFUJITSUSIEMENS:pnFUTROS400:pvr:rvnTECOElectricandMachineryCo.,Ltd.:rnTR53A0:rvrREV1.5:cvnTECOElectricandMachineryCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvrS2054S: dmi.product.name: FUTRO S400 dmi.sys.vendor: FUJITSU SIEMENS ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Incomplete ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise qa-kernel-lts-testing ** Attachment added: "version.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909/+attachment/3504445/+files/version.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107909 Title: Boot-problems on FSC Futro S400 Thin Client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1107909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101684] Re: Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally
My current BIOS-Settings are: 'Power Management Setup'/'ACPI function [Enabled]' 'PnP/PCI Configurations'/'Resources Controlled By [Auto(ESCD)]' 'Integrated Peripherals'/'SIS OnChip IDE Device'/'Primary Master UltraDMA [Disabled]', /'Primary Slave UltraDMA [Disabled]' /'IDE DMA transfer access [Disabled]' 'IDE Primary Slave PIO [Mode 0]', 'IDE Burst Mode [Enabled]' and 'IDE HDD Block Mode [Enabled]' It works for now, so my last and latest guess is this: IDE-DMA-mode interferes with IRQ-Initalisation at boot-time. The device runs well enough, even without IDE-DMA, though it would be a nice to have feature, not trying to measure the difference in overall-performance. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101684 Title: Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1101684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101684] Re: Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally
Untill yesterday I saw problems twice while trying to (re)boot. The first picture 'hss-0.jpg' was taken at cold boot, so maybe it was due to too low environmental temperature. This occured once only, then I reinstallaed and used the ext4 filesystem this time instead of ext3. No boot-problems occured since then. The second picture 'hss-1.jpg' shows the hanging boot-process during IRQ-initialisation with a different BIOS-setting that mentioned above, this happened with 'Resources controlled By [Auto(ESCD)] actually. So it seems, that either the BIOS is a bit buggy and has a sloppy PnP-ACPI initialisation routine, or current Linux kernels are. ** Attachment added: "Screenshot depicts the hanging boot-process at IRQ-initialization" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1101684/+attachment/3496108/+files/hss-0.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101684 Title: Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1101684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101684] Re: Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally
** Attachment added: "Hanging boot-process with PnP-OS enabled" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1101684/+attachment/3496109/+files/hss-1.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101684 Title: Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1101684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101684] Re: Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally
The bootproblems are really quite tricky, sometimes there were no problems for a whole week, then they reoccurred. The box I am currently testing has the current and only available Q-BIOS version. Following settings were made: 'Power Management Setup'/'ACPI function [Enabled]' 'PnP/PCI Configurations'/'Resources Controlled By [Manual]' 'Integrated Peripherals'/'SIS OnChip IDE Device'/'Primary Slave UltraDMA [Disabled]', 'IDE Primary Slave PIO [Mode 0]', 'IDE Burst Mode [Disabled]', 'IDE HDD Block Mode [Disbled]'. This works for now with the current Quantal-Kernel version 3.5.22, which has the CPU run in performance mode initially. Maybe this is sufficient and sustainable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101684 Title: Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1101684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101684] [NEW] Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally
Public bug reported: FSC Futro thinclients can be used as nettops, because high speed CompactFlash cards have become reasonably cheap today. Operatingsystems can be installed locally onto ConpactFlash-memory. The card used provides about the same read-speed as gigabit ethernet would. It was a chronical problem with this box, that intermittent boot-problems occured, either when booted from cold condition or at warm-reboot. The system hung somewhere near IRQ- and ACPI-initialisation. First I thought this might be due to incorrect BIOS-settings, replaced the RAM, now I think, that there are powersupply-incompatibilities between different models. There are two different power-supply models available and incompatibilities may occurbetween systems, please beware. I chose the low-latency kernel variant for this box, i.e. installation was only possible in expert-mode (from USB), during the process I selected the second kernel-version offered (generic) and when it was done, it was possible to install a low-latency kernel and remove the other. With debian I experienced earlier, similar boot-problems with pae-kernels. So it is very positive, that Ubuntu offers a wide variety of kernels with and without PAE, even a realtime-version. There is not so much need to build a kernel-package yourself, that matches the system. 512 MB of RAM are sufficient for Xubuntu for nettop-use. Hopefully it is possible to upgrade to the next LTS-version 2014 without having to upgrade the RAM-amount. The energy-consumption is very low, at a maximum of 21 Watts, so it can also be used as a home-server, running most of the time, or as a client for testing network-setups. 256 MB of RAM are insufficient for desktop-use, because even when using light webbrowsers like midori and 'webbroser' epiphany, it is not possible to open more than two or three tabs at the same times without making the system using swap space, slowing it down to non-usability, also without swapping for light applications it is slower, because there is lack of disk-cache, so even lighter desktop-environments would be recommended. In my opinion this privides avery good price-performance ratio, the boxes are available in abundance in used or refurbished condition and quite affordable. I changed /etc/default/grub and attach this file. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: installation-report 2.46ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-36.36-lowlatency 3.2.35 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-36-lowlatency i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.1 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jan 19 06:56:59 2013 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120822.1) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: installation-report UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: installation-report (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise ** Patch added: "grub-defaults to enable kernel-selection at boot-time and avoid non-displayable graphic mode at shutdown" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101684/+attachment/3488414/+files/grub -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101684 Title: Xubuntu 12.04.1 on FSC-Futro S400 Thinclient locally To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1101684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1100204] [NEW] package is unusable
Public bug reported: This problem was reported once earlier today automatically, now I want to add that the package is completely unusable, a worthless lump of bits. It does not change any settings, but chrashes instead. When you think of it logically, it would at least have to ask the user for his/her password in order to gain root-privileges, but bloody hell it does not. It will not even work if invoked from the terminal-emulator with sudo. But sysv-rc-conf does work for christssake when invoked with sudo in a terminal, so this is fair enough, thus removing that crappy lump of software now from my system. Cheers all. Using Xubuntu 12.04.1 here, it is quite nice otherwise. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: jobs-admin 0.8.0-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-35.34-lowlatency 3.2.34 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-35-lowlatency i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.1 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jan 16 10:29:35 2013 InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120822.1) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: jobs-admin UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: jobs-admin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100204 Title: package is unusable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jobs-admin/+bug/1100204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989992] Re: Opening links in browser fails
It is well possible to open links in the default browser, but it requires manual configuration of liferea. This should not be the case. I did the following: Under Tools/Settings/Browser choose 'Broser:' 'Firefox', which is the system default browser, 'Open-Link-in:''Browser-default'. Using Xubuntu 12.04.1 by the way, no system-upgrades were done on this system, the overall-imression is that it is quite well pollishedand likeable, this issue as an exception. Firefox is the default browser for this distribution, so it is unclear to me, why the default-liferea-configuration was messed up. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989992 Title: Opening links in browser fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liferea/+bug/989992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1080072] [NEW] LTS version set up on FSC Esprimo E BS015
Public bug reported: Installation went fine, the normal AMD64-desktop version was used to set up the opeating system. Upon installation online-updates were set up, I attach /etc/default/grub, which was altered because of messy or not displayable boot-grapghics. Upon the proprietary graphics driver gnome-desktop-environment was set up using synaptic, finally I added 'cpufreqd' an 'cpufreqd-utils'. So the changed /etc/cpufreqd.conf is also attached. Enabling CPU- frequency scaling led to CPU-speed being displayed correctly within 'hardinfo'. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: installation-report 2.46ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-33.52-generic 3.2.31 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-33-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu15 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Nov 17 14:44:02 2012 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120823.1) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: installation-report UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: installation-report (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise ** Patch added: "altered cpu frequency scaling configuration file (default policy)" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080072/+attachment/3436584/+files/cpufreqd.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080072 Title: LTS version set up on FSC Esprimo E BS015 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1080072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1080072] Re: LTS version set up on FSC Esprimo E BS015
** Attachment added: "grub2 default configuration changed to fix graphics-bug for my screen" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1080072/+attachment/3436585/+files/grub -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080072 Title: LTS version set up on FSC Esprimo E BS015 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1080072/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1051599] Re: Ubuntu 12.04.1-AMD64-desktop installed from alternate-CD
It is an AMD Athlon 64 x2 CPU @ 2 GHz, I do not know if it matters, but actually the installation itself was done with an Athlon 64 X2e , 45 W @ 2,5 GHz. It did not work in the expected way, did not really save any additional energy, so I decided to reinsert the original 2GHz-CPU. You can get more info from the closed Debian-installation-report from the same machine here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685127 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #685127 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685127 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051599 Title: Ubuntu 12.04.1-AMD64-desktop installed from alternate-CD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1051599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1051599] Re: Ubuntu 12.04.1-AMD64-desktop installed from alternate-CD
The attached picture shows the screen when the installation process hung from live-CD-environment. The standard-installation-method failed when the system tried to configure apt and hung, too, at this point. ** Attachment added: "picture of failing/hanging live-CD-installation" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1051599/+attachment/3318630/+files/live-CD-fail.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051599 Title: Ubuntu 12.04.1-AMD64-desktop installed from alternate-CD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1051599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1051604] Re: cpufreqd is misconfigured and does not work at all by default
** Patch added: "zlib-compressed configuration file that works for me" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051604/+attachment/3318533/+files/cpufreqd.conf.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051604 Title: cpufreqd is misconfigured and does not work at all by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpufreqd/+bug/1051604/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1051604] [NEW] cpufreqd is misconfigured and does not work at all by default
Public bug reported: 'cpufreqd' and 'cpufrequtils' were installed manually, and they should belong to the standard-system for AMD64-architecture, because most PC do support cpu-frequeny-scaling. /etc/cpufreqd.conf had to be altered in order for the daemon to actually start doing anything. I attach a compressed version of the configuration file, that works for me. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: cpufreqd 2.4.2-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-30.48-generic 3.2.27 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu13 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Sep 16 16:50:04 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120822.4) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: cpufreqd UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) modified.conffile..etc.cpufreqd.conf: [modified] mtime.conffile..etc.cpufreqd.conf: 2012-09-16T14:52:14.193652 ** Affects: cpufreqd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051604 Title: cpufreqd is misconfigured and does not work at all by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpufreqd/+bug/1051604/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1051599] [NEW] Ubuntu 12.04.1-AMD64-desktop installed from alternate-CD
Public bug reported: The normal installation-method did not work on this PC in 64-bit mode, installation from the live-CD environment failed, too. So I downloaded the alternate-desktop CD, which did the job, but clearly not too well, because problems occured, which were reported anonymously, automatically. In my opinion the packages 'cpufreqd' and 'cpufrequtils' should be installed automatically by defaullt for 64-bit architecture, because very most of these computers actually do support cpu-frequency-scaling and it can save some electrical energy, even when it does not work too effectively. cpufreqd was not configured correctly either, so I file a separate bugreport against the 'cpufreqd'-package. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: installation-report 2.46ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-30.48-generic 3.2.27 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu13 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Sep 16 16:34:47 2012 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120822.4) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: installation-report UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: installation-report (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug cpufreqd precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051599 Title: Ubuntu 12.04.1-AMD64-desktop installed from alternate-CD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1051599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1026532] [NEW] Gnome 3 works now with the newer proprietary NVidia-driver
Public bug reported: This is meant to be a clarfication of yesterday´s report. Actually Cinnamon- and Mate- Version of 'Linux Mint 13' were installed on this box yesterday and not on the other P4-computer, I try to get rid of. The situation is now as follows: Installation and System Start went fine first, but when Online-Updates were applied, the next system-start was 'Out of sync range' and not displayable by my monitor. This may be a problem specific to my very monitor, because it reports wrong ddc-values or the like. Setting the default-boot-parameter to 'vga=791' in /etc/default/grub did not change the situation either. Next I tried installing the recommenden propreitary NVidia-driver, which did not work out. Then the newer of the two proprietary drivers was installable and works just fine with gnome-classic and gnome3 are both usable and OK. So there really seems just a functioning driver missing for nvidia-legacy hardware. 3D accelleration works well enough with nouveau, so it would be sufficient, if someone was able to fix this gtk3-nouveau issue. This PC is not for myself, but for someone who still uses the previous LTS-version of Ububtu and is used to gnome. So gnome-classic shoud be OK for her at first without having to learn too many new things about gnome3-usage at once. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: installation-report 2.46ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-26.41-generic-pae 3.2.19 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-26-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu11 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jul 19 11:07:16 2012 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120423) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: installation-report UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: installation-report (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug gtk3 i386 nvidia-nouveau precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026532 Title: Gnome 3 works now with the newer proprietary NVidia-driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1026532/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1026240] [NEW] Precise LTS installed with NVidia-legacy-card --gnome3-windows invisible
Public bug reported: Precise LTS was installed on this Pentium4 computer with an NVidia legacy-graphics card. Gnome looks Ok at first glance now upon installing all the software-updates, but when Applications are launched, the corresponding windows are invisible, semm to be mostly transparent. This is my third choice choice actually. First I tried installing 'Linux Mint Cinnamon', which did not work, looked OK from the live CD, but did not look OK anymore once installed to harddrive, because the bottom-panel was missing then. 'Linux Mint 13 Mate' installed next, this worked OK, but did not start up cleanly either, my monitor showed 'Signal out of sync range' and could not display anything while starting up the system until some garbled words showed briefly and mdm was visible. I tried to fix this by setting the kernel-boot option 'vga=ask' instead of 'silent splash' in /etc/default/grub , but this did not work either, boot hung, so I went for pure Ubuntu. Installation-report-bugs can not be filed using apport-bug in linux-mint, so I give feedback now this way. Will proprietary NVidia-legacy-drivers be made available to Ubuntu- users, once compatible versions are released by the vendor, or did they completely drop support for their legacy-hardware ? I will probably reinstall the whole system once again only with gnome- classic, and/or maybe the mate-desktop. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: installation-report 2.46ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-26.41-generic-pae 3.2.19 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-26-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu11 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jul 18 18:29:02 2012 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120423) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE:en TERM=xterm LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: installation-report UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: installation-report (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 nvidia-legacy precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026240 Title: Precise LTS installed with NVidia-legacy-card --gnome3-windows invisible To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1026240/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1015433] Re: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: gnome3 and cinnamon unusable due to graphics-bug (mint-debian)
** Attachment added: "picture of scrambled cinnamon-menu" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/1015433/+attachment/3197447/+files/cinna-scrennshot.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015433 Title: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: gnome3 and cinnamon unusable due to graphics-bug (mint-debian) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/1015433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1015433] Re: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: gnome3 and cinnamon unusable due to graphics-bug (mint-debian)
** Attachment added: "generated with 'reportbug' on linux mint debian/current" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015433/+attachment/3197164/+files/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015433 Title: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: gnome3 and cinnamon unusable due to graphics-bug (mint-debian) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/1015433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1015433] [NEW] xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: gnome3 and cinnamon unusable due to graphics-bug (mint-debian)
Public bug reported: Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Version: 1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, the issue was reported to several places already, today someone pointed out, that I chose the wrong projects to report against. The bug numbers are: #1010872 #1008396 There is additional hardware-information. I have a NVidia Personal Cinema 5200 Graphics card in this computer and already tried to do several cross-checks, please see what was reported so far. -- Package-specific info: X server symlink status: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Jun 9 11:27 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/Xorg -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2044072 Mar 5 05:21 /usr/bin/Xorg . .. please see attachment ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015433 Title: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: gnome3 and cinnamon unusable due to graphics-bug (mint-debian) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/1015433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009385] [NEW] Installation went fine, but there is no graphics output during startup
Public bug reported: Installation of the 32 bit version failed earlier today, AMD64 went fine now. There is no graphics-output during system-startup. The monitor issues, either that it can not display the video mode, or 'no signal'. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: installation-report (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jun 6 10:41:02 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120425) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: installation-report UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: installation-report (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009385 Title: Installation went fine, but there is no graphics output during startup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/1009385/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1008396] [NEW] gnome3 is unusable on my hardware due to messy screen-font
Public bug reported: This problem was submitted already as an installation-report. Now I reinstalled Ubuntu without Edubuntu and found that Gnome3 ist still unusable on this hardware. I am going to use Linux Mint 13 instead, if no fix is done in due time. Gnome-Classic works OK, but when using this, the Gnome3-Interface-Font is not changeable with the Gnom-Tweak-Tool. My Fix is to say goodbye to Ubuntu. Cheers. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: gnome-desktop-environment 1:3.0+6ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic-pae 3.2.16 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Jun 4 10:47:07 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Beta i386 (20120410) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE:en TERM=xterm LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: meta-gnome3 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: meta-gnome3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008396 Title: gnome3 is unusable on my hardware due to messy screen-font To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meta-gnome3/+bug/1008396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1008396] Re: gnome3 is unusable on my hardware due to messy screen-font
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008396 Title: gnome3 is unusable on my hardware due to messy screen-font To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meta-gnome3/+bug/1008396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 982209] [NEW] 12.4 precise beta installation with edubuntu results in unreadable Gnome-systemfont
Public bug reported: I did this in the following order: -ubuntu 12.4 beta set up -synaptic set up with 'software-center' -gnome set up with 'software-center' -edubuntu-desktop set up using synaptic -gdm was selected as the default display-manager When a gnome-session is selected in gdm, the desktop is practically unusable because of the unreadable, muddy system-font, Gnome-classic is halfways OK, so I use this now. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: installation-report 2.46ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic-pae 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Apr 15 12:15:39 2012 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Beta i386 (20120410) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de:en TERM=xterm LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: installation-report UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: installation-report (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982209 Title: 12.4 precise beta installation with edubuntu results in unreadable Gnome-systemfont To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/982209/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 800645] Re: openoffice.org/libreoffice -package is not installable cleanly on maverick/natty powerpc port
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800645 Title: openoffice.org/libreoffice -package is not installable cleanly on maverick/natty powerpc port To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/800645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 800645] [NEW] openoffice.org/libreoffice -package is not installable cleanly on maverick/natty powerpc port
Public bug reported:
root@g4surfmac:/home/surfer# aptitude install openoffice.org
Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zusätzlich installiert:
ca-certificates-java{a} default-jre{a} default-jre-headless{a}
icedtea-6-jre-cacao{a} icedtea-netx{a}
java-common{a} libaccess-bridge-java{a} libaccess-bridge-java-jni{a}
libgif4{a} libhsqldb-java{a} libreoffice{a}
libreoffice-base{a} libreoffice-base-core{a} libreoffice-calc{a}
libreoffice-common{a} libreoffice-core{a}
libreoffice-draw{a} libreoffice-emailmerge{a} libreoffice-filter-mobiledev{a}
libreoffice-impress{a}
libreoffice-java-common{a} libreoffice-math{a}
libreoffice-report-builder-bin{a} libreoffice-style-human{a}
libreoffice-writer{a} libservlet2.5-java{a} openjdk-6-jre{a}
openjdk-6-jre-headless{a} openjdk-6-jre-lib{a}
openoffice.org python-uno{a} ttf-dejavu{a} ttf-dejavu-extra{a}
ttf-sil-gentium{a} ttf-sil-gentium-basic{a}
tzdata-java{a}
0 Pakete aktualisiert, 36 zusätzlich installiert, 0 werden entfernt und 2 nicht
aktualisiert.
Muss 43,6 MB/101 MB an Archiven herunterladen. Nach dem Entpacken werden 355 MB
zusätzlich belegt sein.
Wollen Sie fortsetzen? [Y/n/?]
Hole:1 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-security/main
openjdk-6-jre-lib all 6b22-1.10.2-0ubuntu1~11.04.1 [5.926 kB]
Hole:2 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-updates/main tzdata-java all
2011g-0ubuntu0.11.04 [138 kB]
Hole:3 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/main java-common all
0.40ubuntu1 [62,8 kB]
Hole:4 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-security/main
openjdk-6-jre-headless powerpc 6b22-1.10.2-0ubuntu1~11.04.1 [23,2 MB]
Hole:5 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/main default-jre-headless
powerpc 1:1.6-40ubuntu1 [4.390 B]
Hole:6 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/main ca-certificates-java
all 20100412 [101 kB]
Hole:7 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/main libgif4 powerpc 4.1.6-9
[41,3 kB]
Hole:8 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/main libaccess-bridge-java
all 1.26.2-5 [410 kB]
Hole:9 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/main
libaccess-bridge-java-jni powerpc 1.26.2-5 [8.898 B]
Hole:10 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-security/main openjdk-6-jre
powerpc 6b22-1.10.2-0ubuntu1~11.04.1 [227 kB]
Hole:11 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/main default-jre powerpc
1:1.6-40ubuntu1 [876 B]
Hole:12 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/main libservlet2.5-java all
6.0.28-10ubuntu2 [186 kB]
Hole:13 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/main libhsqldb-java all
1.8.0.10-9ubuntu1 [932 kB]
Hole:14 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-updates/main
libreoffice-java-common all 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 [4.284 kB]
Hole:15 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-updates/main
libreoffice-base powerpc 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 [1.776 kB]
Hole:16 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-updates/universe
libreoffice-report-builder-bin powerpc 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 [651 kB]
Hole:17 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/main ttf-dejavu-extra all
2.31-1 [3.125 kB]
Hole:18 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/main ttf-dejavu all 2.31-1
[3.154 B]
Hole:19 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/universe
ttf-sil-gentium-basic all 1.1-2 [871 kB]
Hole:20 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-updates/universe
libreoffice-filter-mobiledev all 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 [92,7 kB]
Hole:21 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-updates/universe
libreoffice powerpc 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 [3.874 B]
Hole:22 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-updates/universe
openoffice.org all 1:3.3.0-7ubuntu2 [3.288 B]
Hole:23 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty/universe ttf-sil-gentium
all 20081126:1.02-11 [685 kB]
Hole:24 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-security/main
icedtea-6-jre-cacao powerpc 6b22-1.10.2-0ubuntu1~11.04.1 [444 kB]
Hole:25 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ natty-updates/main icedtea-netx
powerpc 1.1~20110420-0ubuntu1.1 [450 kB]
43,6 MB wurden in 58 s heruntergeladen (748 kB/s)
Extrahiere Vorlagen aus Paketen: 100%
Vormals abgewähltes Paket openjdk-6-jre-lib wird gewählt.
(Lese Datenbank ... 122701 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.)
Entpacken von openjdk-6-jre-lib (aus
.../openjdk-6-jre-lib_6b22-1.10.2-0ubuntu1~11.04.1_all.deb) ...
Vormals abgewähltes Paket tzdata-java wird gewählt.
Entpacken von tzdata-java (aus .../tzdata-java_2011g-0ubuntu0.11.04_all.deb) ...
Vormals abgewähltes Paket java-common wird gewählt.
Entpacken von java-common (aus .../java-common_0.40ubuntu1_all.deb) ...
Vormals abgewähltes Paket open
[Bug 800639] Re: VLC-package is not installable on upgraded natty powerpc
aptitude can not find another solution for this task than the one shown above -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800639 Title: VLC-package is not installable on upgraded natty powerpc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/800639/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 800639] [NEW] VLC-package is not installable on upgraded natty powerpc
Public bug reported:
root@g4surfmac:/home/surfer# aptitude install vlc
Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zusätzlich installiert:
appmenu-qt{a} liba52-0.7.4{a} libass4{a} libaudio2{a} libavformat52{a}
libcddb2{a}
libdbusmenu-qt2{a} libdc1394-22{a} libdca0{a} libdirac-encoder0{a}
libdvbpsi6{a}
libdvdnav4{a} libdvdread4{a} libebml3{a} libenca0{a} libfaad2{a}
libiso9660-7{a} libkate1{a}
libmatroska3{a} libmpeg2-4{a} libqt4-dbus{a} libqt4-xml{a} libqtcore4{a}
libqtgui4{a}
libsdl-image1.2{a} libswscale0{a} libtar{a} libtwolame0{a} libupnp3{a}
libva-x11-1{a}
libvcdinfo0{a} libvlc5{a} libvlccore4{ab} libxcb-keysyms1{a} libxcb-randr0{a}
vlc
vlc-nox{ab} vlc-plugin-notify{a} vlc-plugin-pulse{a}
0 Pakete aktualisiert, 39 zusätzlich installiert, 0 werden entfernt und 2 nicht
aktualisiert.
Muss 13,4 MB an Archiven herunterladen. Nach dem Entpacken werden 45,7 MB
zusätzlich belegt sein.
Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abhängigkeiten:
vlc-nox: Hängt ab von: libx264-98 , welches ein virtuelles Paket ist.
libvlccore4: Hängt ab von: vlc-data (= 1.1.8-2ubuntu1) but it is not going to
be installed.
Die folgenden Aktionen werden diese Abhängigkeiten auflösen:
Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version:
1) libvlc5 [Nicht installiert]
2) libvlccore4 [Nicht installiert]
3) vlc [Nicht installiert]
4) vlc-nox [Nicht installiert]
5) vlc-plugin-notify [Nicht installiert]
6) vlc-plugin-pulse [Nicht installiert]
Diese Lösung akzeptieren? [Y/n/q/?] q
Alle Anstrengungen, diese Abhängigkeiten aufzulösen, aufgegeben.
Abbruch.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: vlc (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-powerpc 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-powerpc ppc
Architecture: powerpc
Date: Wed Jun 22 13:40:19 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release powerpc (20101008)
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=de_DE:en
LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: vlc
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-06-15 (6 days ago)
** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: apport-bug natty powerpc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800639
Title:
VLC-package is not installable on upgraded natty powerpc
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/800639/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 798550] Re: package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: nicht vollständig gelesen in Pufferkopie für Backend dpkg-deb während »./usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/temp
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798550 Title: package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: nicht vollständig gelesen in Pufferkopie für Backend dpkg-deb während »./usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/template/layout/lyt- techpoly.otp« To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/798550/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 798550] [NEW] package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: nicht vollständig gelesen in Pufferkopie für Backend dpkg-deb während »./usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/te
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libreoffice libreoffice update seems to have failed to update/upgrade ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-powerpc 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-powerpc ppc AptOrdering: libreoffice-common: Install libreoffice-common: Configure Architecture: powerpc Date: Fri Jun 17 09:23:08 2011 ErrorMessage: nicht vollständig gelesen in Pufferkopie für Backend dpkg-deb während »./usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/template/layout/lyt-techpoly.otp« InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release powerpc (20101008) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: nicht vollständig gelesen in Pufferkopie für Backend dpkg-deb während »./usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/template/layout/lyt-techpoly.otp« UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-06-15 (1 days ago) ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package natty powerpc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798550 Title: package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: nicht vollständig gelesen in Pufferkopie für Backend dpkg-deb während »./usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/share/template/layout/lyt- techpoly.otp« To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/798550/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 798069] Re: There is now ISO-image of version 11.04 downloadable for ppc architecture
** Attachment added: "dmsg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/798069/+attachment/2170942/+files/dmsg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798069 Title: There is now ISO-image of version 11.04 downloadable for ppc architecture To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/798069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 798069] Re: There is now ISO-image of version 11.04 downloadable for ppc architecture
** Attachment added: "dev.pci" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/798069/+attachment/2170941/+files/dev.pci -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798069 Title: There is now ISO-image of version 11.04 downloadable for ppc architecture To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/798069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 798069] Re: There is now ISO-image of version 11.04 downloadable for ppc architecture
** Attachment added: "modu.les" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798069/+attachment/2170938/+files/modu.les -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798069 Title: There is now ISO-image of version 11.04 downloadable for ppc architecture To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/798069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 798069] [NEW] There is now ISO-image of version 11.04 downloadable for ppc architecture
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: installation-report There was no ISO- image of vesrsion 11.04 downloadable for PPC architecure. Upon installation of version 10.10 the first thing offered was an upgrade of the OS to 11.04. That took quite some time. My first impression is that it runs a bit more fluently than the previous LTS- version. And this old mac-box seems to be more apt to be used for surfing the web now. [technical details attached] ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: installation-report 2.44ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-powerpc 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-powerpc ppc Architecture: powerpc Date: Thu Jun 16 10:22:22 2011 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release powerpc (20101008) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_DE:en LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: installation-report UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-06-15 (0 days ago) ** Affects: installation-report (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug natty powerpc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798069 Title: There is now ISO-image of version 11.04 downloadable for ppc architecture To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/798069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790635] Re: most benchmarks do not work at all
Upon trying to run those benchmarks, there was a process called 'backend' which loaded the cpu to about 90%. Upon reboot that was gone. By the Way: The package 'chromium-browser' is missing, but 'chromium-browser-inspector' exists, but it is impossible to report that. Is it OK to use chromium-browser while not wanting to use google-web-search anyway? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790635 Title: most benchmarks do not work at all -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790526] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS installed on 450 MHz g4 mac
** Attachment added: "output of lsmod and lspci" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/790526/+attachment/2149000/+files/ls-mod-pci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790526 Title: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS installed on 450 MHz g4 mac -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790526] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS installed on 450 MHz g4 mac
** Attachment added: "output of dmesg command" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-report/+bug/790526/+attachment/2148943/+files/dmsg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790526 Title: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS installed on 450 MHz g4 mac -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790635] Re: most benchmarks do not work at all
** Attachment added: "some test results" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790635/+attachment/2148904/+files/phorobench -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790635 Title: most benchmarks do not work at all -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790635] [NEW] most benchmarks do not work at all
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: phoronix-test-suite Using ubuntu 10.04 lts on a g4 mac, I tried to run several tests from phoronix-test-suite , but found that most of those benchmarks do not work at all. In fact only compilebench and byte produced any results, the other ones I tried all failed. Can it be due to my decision, not to submit the test-result-statistics anonymously to their global webpage ? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: phoronix-test-suite 2.4.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-32.62-powerpc 2.6.32.38+drm33.16 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-32-powerpc ppc Architecture: powerpc Date: Tue May 31 13:48:53 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release powerpc (20100428) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: phoronix-test-suite ** Affects: phoronix-test-suite (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug lucid powerpc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790635 Title: most benchmarks do not work at all -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790526] [NEW] Ubuntu 10.04 LTS installed on 450 MHz g4 mac
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: installation-report This machine is intended to be used as a surf-box. It runs fine so far, but feels a bit spongy, probably due to the slow sd memory and the pci graphics adaptor it has. The installation went without any problems in automatic partitioning mode, a separate /home partition was created, ext 4 used. A CD was used as installation source, a network mirror, too. pon installation there were about 400 updates to me made. The amount of time consumed by this task could be reduced by providing more recent installation CD images for the IBM PPC architecture. Overall this can be considered a complete success. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: installation-report 2.39ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-32.62-powerpc 2.6.32.38+drm33.16 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-32-powerpc ppc Architecture: powerpc Date: Tue May 31 09:51:28 2011 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release powerpc (20100428) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: installation-report ** Affects: installation-report (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug lucid powerpc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790526 Title: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS installed on 450 MHz g4 mac -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773849] [NEW] successfull reinstallation on fsc-scenic-e620
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: installation-report What do you want to know ? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: installation-report 2.39ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-31.61-generic 2.6.32.32+drm33.14 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-31-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Apr 30 06:52:24 2011 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20110211.1) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: installation-report ** Affects: installation-report (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773849 Title: successfull reinstallation on fsc-scenic-e620 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
