[Bug 2033313] Re: Rename ua_logs.tar.gz to up_logs.tar.gz

2024-04-26 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Note that some files inside the tarball were also renamed, i.e., ua- status.json became pro-status.json. This should also be called out in the SRU template. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2056442] Update Released

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for crun has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
There was no clear indication which running kernel was used during the verifications, so I did it: Using the Dockerfile from the test plan: FROM ubuntu:noble RUN apt install -U systemd -y CMD ["/lib/systemd/systemd"] And building with "podman build -t systemd ." a) 5.15.0-105 kernel (jammy GA

[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Marking mantic as "won't fix" according to comment #33 above. ** Changed in: crun (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442 Title:

[Bug 2058193] Re: Support Synaptics fingerprint device with ID [06CB:0106]

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I see it in noble[1], but not mantic[2], and there is no mention in this bug about skipping mantic on purpose. When interim releases are skipped, it's best to explicitly declare the intent and reason. 1.

[Bug 1990630] Update Released

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for tracker-miners has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you

[Bug 2053157] Re: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
As explained in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/+bug/2053157/comments/7, the testing was conducted in the main SRU bug. I'll flip the tags accordingly. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1976312] Update Released

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for pathological has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you

[Bug 2045708] Update Released

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gce-compute-image- packages has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event

[Bug 2052438] Re: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
That has cleared. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052438 Title: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2059197] Update Released

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nfs-utils has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you

[Bug 2059197] Re: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Your verification showed "permission denied" when NFSv3 was attempted, which I expect when -t nfs4 is used, but not in the -t nfs case, or when "-t" is not used at all. Since this is a quick check, I ran these tests: root@j-nfs-server:~# cat /proc/fs/nfsd/versions -2 +3 -4 -4.0 -4.1 -4.2

[Bug 2052438] Re: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
google-guest-agent was promoted to main to fix this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052438 Title: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent To manage

[Bug 2063381] Re: NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2059197 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059197 Thanks for the verification, I'll mark this bug as a duplicate of that one then. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2059197 mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o

[Bug 2052438] Re: Update d/control file with a dependency on google-guest-agent

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I'm trying to understand and sortout a component mismatch that this update is introducing in focal. Apparently you guys stopped building bin:google-compute-engine-oslogin from src:gce-compute-images-packages a while back, and now it's src:google-compute-engine-oslogin that builds

[Bug 2052438] Update Released

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for google-compute-engine- oslogin has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the

[Bug 2040463] Update Released

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for dpdk has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Bug 2055283] Re: Intel Bluetooth AX201 needs firmware intel/ibt-0180-4150.sfi

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, the test plan calls out for two additional steps which I don't see in your verification: > run hciconfig, the hci0 shows up. > run checkbox testcase, it could pass. > [Checkbox job `com.canonical.certification::bluetooth/detect-output` output] Could you please clarify if you have performed

[Bug 2040463] Re: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
What's the status of this in noble please? - the noble bug task says "confirmed" - this bug's description starts with "Backport dpdk as MRE to noble once the update for noble has been completed." Are we waiting for a noble update? Noble currently has 23.11-1build3. -- You received this bug

[Bug 2056100] Update Released

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you

[Bug 2049197] Update Released

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ruby3.1 has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Bug 2051380] Update Released

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ruby3.1 has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Bug 2063381] Re: NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I think this is a dupe of #2059197, but let's wait for confirmation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063381 Title: NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0 To manage notifications

[Bug 2063381] Re: NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Ryan, I think you are experiencing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2059197 which is a regression on focal from a previous update that also tried to address the version negotiation. There is a new nfs-utils package in focal-proposed to address that, would you mind trying it

[Bug 2063257] [NEW] Noble: default pam config for login tries do load non-existent pam_lastlog.so

2024-04-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: pam_lastlog.so was dropped by upstream in 1.5.3[1][4]. It's still there in the code, but not built by default. And indeed, in noble (1.5.3) we don't have it, while mantic (1.5.2) does. This does not prevent console logins, but generates an error in the logs: Apr 23 20:02:09

[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty

2024-04-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Tags added: block-proposed-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060566 Title: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2062561] Re: There are no APT sources configured in /etc/apt/sources.list or /etc/apt/sources.list.d.

2024-04-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: landscape-client (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062561 Title: There are no APT sources configured in

[Bug 2063079] Re: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba-profile

2024-04-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
eas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: samba (

[Bug 2063079] Re: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba-profile

2024-04-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Given that: - samba's apparmor profile is not enabled by default. One has to install apparmor-profiles, and put the profile in enforce mode (it's in complain mode by default) - we are in the release week, isos are being built. This could at most be a 0-day SRU - we have been running without

[Bug 2063079] Re: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba-profile

2024-04-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063079 Title: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for

[Bug 2063079] Re: samba smbd.service is missing ExecStartPre for update-apparmor-samba-profile

2024-04-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hm, this was introduced in this version, and I missed it in the subsequent merge: samba (2:4.19.4+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * new upstream stable/bugfix release. See WHATSNEW.txt for details. * d/control: drop pkg.samba.nouring build profile: was needed for focal which we do not

[Bug 2058687] Please test proposed package

2024-04-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Rico, or anyone else affected, Accepted libreoffice into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/4:7.6.6-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2058687] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.6 for mantic

2024-04-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
translations tarball verified help tarball verified tarballs tarball: @@ -14,12 +14,13 @@ tiff-4.6.0.tar.xz libepubgen-0.1.1.tar.xz a39f6c07ddb20d7dd2ff1f95fa21e2cd-raptor2-2.0.15.tar.gz +libxslt-1.1.39.tar.xz freetype-2.13.0.tar.xz beeca87be45ec87d241ddd0e1bad80c1-bsh-2.0b6-src.zip

[Bug 2058687] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.6.6 for mantic

2024-04-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I downloaded the original tarballs from https://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/src/7.6.6/ and: - verified their signatures - matched 7.6.6.orig.tar.xz to upstream's 7.6.6.3 (it's a versioning quirk to call 7.6.6rc3 7.6.6.3 in the end): $ sha256sum libreoffice_7.6.6.orig.tar.xz

[Bug 2062421] [NEW] ceph-mgr-dashobard is uninstallable on noble due to dependency on python3-distutils

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: python3-distutils was removed from ceph in [1], but added back in [2]. This makes the package currently in noble-proposed[2] uninstallable, and is blocking its migration, because python3-distutils doesn't exist anymore. Note the coming back of python3-distutils is not

[Bug 2059197] Please test proposed package

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Jeff, or anyone else affected, Accepted nfs-utils into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs- utils/1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2059197] Re: mount.nfs: Fix minor version parsing when '-t nfs4' and '-o vers=4.x' are used together

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Thanks for the detailed -o vers=x.y tests. I think we are just missing the default case, with nothing fancy specified in the command-line. Please also include in the test a normal without-options mount attempt, i.e., the default. Something like a series of these, verifying which version it ended

[Bug 2057576] Re: php-fpm sometimes SIGSEGVs (signal 11) when running fpm_get_status

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
So what are you saying, that phpinfo() is causing random segfaults? So you have a run with just phpinfo() with the php8.2 packages from release and proposed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/19.7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] As Trusty is reaching EOL of ESM support, we are now creating a new service called esm-infra-legacy to extend ESM support for more time. - This service will only be available and visible on Trusty and users who - are entitled to that service, will need to

[Bug 2062269] Re: incorrect parsing of long command lines

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: unhide (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb) ** Changed in: unhide (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062269

[Bug 2062269] [NEW] incorrect parsing of long command lines

2024-04-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- noble/noble/ppc64el/u/unhide/20240418_084331_7a010@/log.gz """ 534s autopkgtest [08:42:25]: test command5: unhide reverse 534s autopkgtest [08:42:25]: test command5: [--- 534s Unhide 20211016 534s

[Bug 2061966] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Uploaded to noble unapproved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061966 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ To manage notifications about this

[Bug 2061370] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This was uploaded and is in noble-unapproved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061370 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This was uploaded and is in noble-unapproved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 2061966] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The configure check is failing due to a missing include: conftest.c: In function 'main': conftest.c:177:20: error: implicit declaration of function 'exit' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 177 | struct timeval tv; exit(gettimeofday(, NULL)); |^~~~

[Bug 2061966] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061966 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ To manage notifications about this

[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Thanks for verifying it. This is up for review and as soon as it's approved I'll upload. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Tags added: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
nee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To manage notifications ab

[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I managed to reproduce it finally after I added "strictexpire" to /etc/auto.master -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061667 Title: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow To

[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
And your second reproducer, with /mp in auto.master, doesn't work here: # ls -la /mp/mumon/_. ls: cannot access '/mp/mumon/_.': No such file or directory handle_packet: type = 3 handle_packet_missing_indirect: token 43, name mumon, request pid 4242 attempting to mount entry /mp/mumon

[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Which kernel are you running? There are some kernel version checks in the code which affect a buffer size, and that's a buffer that make_options_string() writes to. I haven't been able to reproduce this yet, with any of your config files. I'm on noble's kernel: 6.8.0-22 -- You received this bug

[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

2024-04-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Thanks for this, I know better where to look now. The config files or a minimal reproducer would still help, of course. In the meantime, you can also try debuginfod[1], which is a way for gdb to automatically fetcl all the symbols for you. TL;DR Something like this sudo -i (because automounter

[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

2024-04-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Tried direct and indirect nfs mounts, and the test suite also does nfs and cifs mounts, no segfault: root@server:~# automount -d3 -f Starting automounter version 5.1.9, master map /etc/auto.master using kernel protocol version 5.05 lookup_nss_read_master: reading master file /etc/auto.master

[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service

2024-04-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Looks good, but please also include: - azure run (to at least show it's still working, if you cannot reproduce the bug there easily) - what a test failure looks like, according to this plan +1 to go ahead and update the bug description's [test plan]. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 2059952] Please test proposed package

2024-04-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.3~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2059952] Please test proposed package

2024-04-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.3~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2059952] Please test proposed package

2024-04-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.3~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2059952] Please test proposed package

2024-04-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.3~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2059952] Please test proposed package

2024-04-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.3~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service

2024-04-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> However, CPC is already aware of this issue and will help us creating the test plan here. I understand CPC can hit this bug quite frequently in the affected cloud images, so releasing this SRU to updates is conditional on an actual test plan being better described by them, and followed. **

[Bug 2061325] Re: FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'?

2024-04-15 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This is in noble-proposed now. ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061325 Title: FTBFS in noble: test

[Bug 2061325] Re: FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'?

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061325 Title: FTBFS in

[Bug 2061325] Re: FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'?

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/4.5.6-0ubuntu3 is failing to build in noble. Lots of test failures like: ERROR: test_open_file (tests.unittests.utilities_tests.GrepTest.test_open_file)

[Bug 2061325] [NEW] FTBFS in noble: test failures: object has no attribute 'assertEquals'. Did you mean: 'assertEqual'?

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/4.5.6-0ubuntu3 is failing to build in noble. Lots of test failures like: ERROR: test_open_file (tests.unittests.utilities_tests.GrepTest.test_open_file) --

[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Mantic verification succeeded. ** Attachment added: "mantic-verification.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+attachment/5765296/+files/mantic-verification.log ** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done-mantic

[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Jammy verification succeeded. ** Attachment added: "jammy-verification.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+attachment/5765295/+files/jammy-verification.log ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy --

[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Focal verification succeeded. ** Attachment added: "focal-verification.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+attachment/5765294/+files/focal-verification.log ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal --

[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Bionic verification succeeded. ** Attachment added: "bionic-verification.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+attachment/5765293/+files/bionic-verification.log ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic

[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The remaining verifications were done with the attached script. ** Attachment added: "test-apparmor.sh" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2057937/+attachment/5765292/+files/test-apparmor.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2057937] Re: apt-news.service reporting errors after ubuntu-pro-client install

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Xenial verification a) Reproducing the problem, and confirming the fix Starting with 31.2: $ dpkg -l ubuntu-advantage-tools | grep ubuntu-advantage-tools ii ubuntu-advantage-tools 31.2~16.04 all transitional dummy package for ubuntu-pro-client Removing apparmor: $ sudo apt remove

[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Jammy verification With the package from proposed: $ apt-cache policy ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-advantage-tools: Installed: 31.2.2~22.04 Candidate: 31.2.2~22.04 Version table: *** 31.2.2~22.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages

[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Xenial verification With the package from proposed: $ apt-cache policy ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-advantage-tools: Installed: 31.2.2~16.04 Candidate: 31.2.2~16.04 Version table: *** 31.2.2~16.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages

[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Bionic verification With the package from proposed: $ apt-cache policy ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-advantage-tools: Installed: 31.2.2~18.04 Candidate: 31.2.2~18.04 Version table: *** 31.2.2~18.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-proposed/main amd64 Packages

[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Focal verification With the package from proposed: $ apt-cache policy ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-advantage-tools: Installed: 31.2.2~20.04 Candidate: 31.2.2~20.04 Version table: *** 31.2.2~20.04 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-proposed/main amd64 Packages

[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Mantic verification With the package from proposed: $ apt-cache policy ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-advantage-tools: Installed: 31.2.2~23.10 Candidate: 31.2.2~23.10 Version table: *** 31.2.2~23.10 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic-proposed/main amd64 Packages

[Bug 2058934] Re: Missing version.py update

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This is fix released in noble via https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2.2 (and noble has 31.2.3 already). ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 2060967] Re: noble/rsync buffer overflow detected

2024-04-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I'm surprised this wasn't caught by the DEP8 tests. Care to also perhaps add a simple smoke test, like (note it's not using ssh or any network): $ rsync -F --delete-after --archive /etc/os-release /tmp/ *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (34 bytes

[Bug 2060848] Re: minifycss fails to run in Noble

2024-04-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
diff -Nru matthiasmullie-minify-1.3.68/debian/patches/fix-path.patch matthiasmullie-minify-1.3.68/debian/patches/fix-path.patch --- matthiasmullie-minify-1.3.68/debian/patches/fix-path.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ matthiasmullie-minify-1.3.68/debian/patches/fix-path.patch

[Bug 2060848] Re: minifycss fails to run in Noble

2024-04-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Also affects: matthiasmullie-minify (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: matthiasmullie-minify (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2060692] Re: cupsd 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 on noble crashes due to recently backported commits from 2.4.x git

2024-04-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/2.4.7-1.2ubuntu6 is in noble- proposed claiming to fix this bug. Comment #6 above says there is a missing patch still. In any case, doesn't look like there is anything to sponsor here, so unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors. -- You received this bug

[Bug 2060335] Re: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64

2024-04-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
And unsubscribing sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060335 Title: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2060335] Re: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64

2024-04-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
At the moment, noble-proposed has https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/1.90.3-1, uploaded a few hours ago: upower (1.90.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 1.90.3 * Drop patches, merged upstream * Bump Build-Depends on meson to (>= 0.60.0) and libglib2.0-dev to (>=

[Bug 2052961] Re: Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported

2024-04-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2056442 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2056442 Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 2053157] Re: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Chad, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Bug 2056100] Please test proposed package

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Brett, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Bug 2056100] Please test proposed package

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Brett, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Bug 2056100] Re: sru cloud-init 23.4.4 to 24.1.3

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Brett, or anyone else affected, Accepted cloud-init into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud- init/24.1.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2056100] Re: sru cloud-init 23.4.4 to 24.1.3

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I was careful in checking that the debian/patches/status-retain- recoverable-error-exit-code.patch patch was kept for mantic and earlier, as to not reintroduce #2048522. And I know it was decided that in noble the decision is to not patch it, i.e., return 2. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 2053157] Re: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This is missing the SRU template, or clarification whether the test plan of the main SRU bug at #2056100 covers this change here. Normally, called-out bugs in d/changelog need to have the SRU template filled in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2053157] Re: Jammy: netplan permissions warnings

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Changing jammy status to "in progress", because it's still in unapproved. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Adding a release notes task to put a note under "known issues". ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060217

[Bug 2052642] Re: opeanfs-modules-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This update is still missing the mantic verification, which blocks a jammy release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052642 Title: opeanfs-modules-dkms FTBS with linux 6.5 on jammy

[Bug 2058133] Update Released

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for update-manager has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you

[Bug 2058133] Re: [SRU] update-manager crashes when ua security-status response is an error

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Focal still has an ubuntu-release-upgrader regression on armhf. I triggered that one again. Jammy is ok. Bionic is ok, but can't be released before focal. The xenial upload is still in unapproved, probably because there is another xenial SRU going on in xenial-proposed: 1:16.04.21 -- You

[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> # dpkg -l crun Markus, thanks for the verification, but crun can be installed together with runc, and it's not clear which one will end up being used. That's why it's best to also make sure runc is *not* installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2056442] Re: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This is blocked on a mantic upload fixing the same issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442 Title: Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod

[Bug 2054621] Update Released

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for php8.1 has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >