[Bug 1677512] Re: Backporting garbage-collection functionality

2024-02-25 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I think this can be closed. All supported versions of Ubuntu have docker-registry 2.6 or later. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677512 Title: Backporting garbage-collection

[Bug 1403152] Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count

2021-07-30 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I've got this issue on ``` # lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS Release:20.04 Codename: focal # uname -a Linux ultima 5.4.0-80-generic #90-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 9 22:49:44 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ```

[Bug 1917509] Re: Call for testing: grub2 security updates

2021-03-06 Thread Andreas Schildbach
On a focal system all up-to-date, I installed these updates (and only these) from focal-proposed, and everything seems fine. System is booting as normal. grub-common/focal-proposed 2.04-1ubuntu26.11 amd64 [upgradable from: 2.04-1ubuntu26.9] grub-efi-amd64-bin/focal-proposed 2.04-1ubuntu42 amd64

[Bug 1902525] Re: btrfs subvolume list segmentation fault

2020-11-04 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I'm seeing this on fully-updated Ubuntu 20.04 LTS with stock kernel 5.4.0-52-generic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902525 Title: btrfs subvolume list segmentation fault To manage

[Bug 1818549] Re: Can't use the extensions provided by the webext-* packages

2019-06-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
There is a separate package chromium-ublock-origin. Maybe try that one for Chromium? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818549 Title: Can't use the extensions provided by the webext-*

[Bug 1814133] Re: update to openjdk 11 in 18.04 LTS

2019-04-15 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Is there any idea when this OpenJDK 11 transition will happen, and Gradle 4.4.1 be released from bionic-proposed to bionic-updates? No need for an exact date, but will it take more like days or weeks from now? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1823476] [NEW] Rebuild with OpenSSL 1.1.1

2019-04-06 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: Now that OpenSSL 1.1.1 is in bionic-proposed and will enter bionic- updates soon, please also rebuild nginx against OpenSSL 1.1.1 so we can make full use of TLSv1.3. Currently OpenSSL 1.1.0 seems to be statically linked. ** Affects: nginx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1821235] Re: java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/android/apksigner/ApkSignerTool has been compiled by a more recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 55.0), this version of

2019-03-27 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Works on Cosmic, too. Thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed-cosmic ** Tags added: verification-done-cosmic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821235 Title:

[Bug 1821235] Re: java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/android/apksigner/ApkSignerTool has been compiled by a more recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 55.0), this version of

2019-03-25 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Damn, the repository still had the old version. Now, with the new version, it works. Sorry for that. ** Tags removed: verification-failed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1821235] Re: java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/android/apksigner/ApkSignerTool has been compiled by a more recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 55.0), this version of

2019-03-25 Thread Andreas Schildbach
On Bionic, nothing has changed. $ dpkg -l apksigner Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name

[Bug 1814133] Re: update to openjdk 11 in 18.04 LTS

2019-03-21 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I've got another regression, this time in ApkSigner: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/android-platform-tools- apksig/+bug/1821235 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814133

[Bug 1821235] [NEW] java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/android/apksigner/ApkSignerTool has been compiled by a more recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 55.0), this version o

2019-03-21 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: Here is another regression from the new packages in Bionic proposed- updates: $ apksigner Error: A JNI error has occurred, please check your installation and try again Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/android/apksigner/ApkSignerTool has

[Bug 1797761] Re: Gradle 4.4.1 package missing alternative dep to Java8

2019-03-21 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Cool, thanks! Works well so far (both Bionic and Cosmic). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797761 Title: Gradle 4.4.1 package missing alternative dep to Java8 To manage notifications

[Bug 1820513] Re: android-* packages not working well with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-20 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Feedback on #2 is contained in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gradle/+bug/1820389. As far as I can tell the blocker regressions are gone. However there is still the issue of the missing alternative dependency declaration: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gradle/+bug/1797761 I

[Bug 1821073] [NEW] libgradle-android-plugin-java 2.2.2 is outdated

2019-03-20 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: Now that Gradle 4.4.1 is about to enter Bionic, and has been available in Cosmic and Dingo for some time, it is safe to say that version 2.2.2 of the Android Gradle plugin is a very outdated match. Looking at https://developer.android.com/studio/releases/gradle-plugin

[Bug 1797761] Re: Gradle 4.4.1 package missing alternative dep to Java8

2019-03-20 Thread Andreas Schildbach
#1820389 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797761 Title: Gradle 4.4.1 package missing alternative dep to Java8 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1820389] Re: Gradle on OpenJDK 8: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.privateLookupIn()

2019-03-20 Thread Andreas Schildbach
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gradle/+bug/1797761 for the remaining issue with the alternative dependency declaration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820389 Title:

[Bug 1797761] Re: Gradle 4.4.1 package missing alternative dep to Java8

2019-03-20 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I tested all my projects in the Gradle 4.4.1 / OpenJDK 8 combination and I can say it's compatible. So there is no reason to not allow an alternative dependency to OpenJDK 8. For more information see issue 1820389. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1820389] Re: Gradle on OpenJDK 8: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.privateLookupIn()

2019-03-20 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I rebooted my machine and now everything works. Not sure where the old code was hiding. ** Tags removed: verification-failed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1820389] Re: Gradle on OpenJDK 8: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.privateLookupIn()

2019-03-19 Thread Andreas Schildbach
@Tiago: I just tried and the smallest possible project is the empty directory. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820389 Title: Gradle on OpenJDK 8: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:

[Bug 1820389] Re: Gradle on OpenJDK 8: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.privateLookupIn()

2019-03-19 Thread Andreas Schildbach
This is about Bionic again. Thanks for mentioning the daemon. I ran $ gradle --no-daemon --stacktrace clean The full exception is: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at org.gradle.internal.classloader.FilteringClassLoader.(FilteringClassLoader.java:48) at

[Bug 1820389] Re: Gradle on OpenJDK 8: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.privateLookupIn()

2019-03-19 Thread Andreas Schildbach
On Ubuntu Cosmic, I installed gradle 4.4.1-5~18.10.1, also moved ~/.gradle out of the way and used update-java-alternatives to make OpenJDK 8 the default. I tested 3 Java and 2 Android projects and all build fine. There are some additional warnings about features that will be removed with Gradle

[Bug 1820389] Re: Gradle on OpenJDK 8: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.privateLookupIn()

2019-03-19 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I just installed gradle 4.4.1-5~18.04 and moved ~/.gradle to ~/.gradle.bak (actually it's a dangerous suggestion to remove that directory, because it can contain user settings). Issue 1: The hard dependency to OpenJDK 11 is still there. I can't uninstall OpenJDK 11 without uninstalling gradle.

[Bug 1820389] Re: Gradle on OpenJDK 8: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.privateLookupIn()

2019-03-19 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Thanks a lot! I'm happy to test any new proposed packages and will report back the findings. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820389 Title: Gradle on OpenJDK 8:

[Bug 1820513] Re: android-* packages not working well with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
For completeness, I just tested the combination Gradle 3.4.1 and OpenJDK 11, all from current Bionic (updated): * I get the "WARNING: An illegal reflective access" spamming in the console. Reported separately: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gradle/+bug/1803855 * The build breaks

[Bug 1820513] Re: android-* packages not working well with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Does this answer your questions? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820513 Title: android-* packages not working well with OpenJDK 11 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1820513] Re: android-* packages not working well with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Actually I don't find an openjdk-10-jdk[-headless] package in Bionic, so I'm not sure if I ever tested OpenJDK 10. Probably not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820513 Title:

[Bug 1820513] Re: android-* packages not working well with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
First, a clarification: I'm not yet using the android* packages for building my Android apps. I would very much like to, but they seemed incomplete and outdated whenever I checked. Rather, I'm using the Android SDK downloaded from Google and brought up to date by running "sdkmanager --update".

[Bug 1814133] Re: update to openjdk 11 in 18.04 LTS

2019-03-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
@Matthias: The current Gradle 3.4.1 doesn't requre Java 10 or 11. It runs fine with Java 8, and the declared package dependencies also reflects that. For an LTS, I'm suggesting to keep the compatiblity to Java 8, especially since upstream Gradle works fine with Java 8 (even the current version).

[Bug 1820389] Re: Gradle on OpenJDK 8: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.privateLookupIn()

2019-03-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
@Tiago But can this be fixed *before* Gradle 4.4.1 is released to bionic-updates? I expect this will break many setups, certainly not what you'd expect for a LTS release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1820389] Re: Gradle on OpenJDK 8: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.privateLookupIn()

2019-03-17 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I just compared the Gradle 4.4.1 in bionic-proposed against a manually installed Gradle 4.4.1. The manual install doesn't have this bug! For reference: $ gradle --version Gradle 4.4.1

[Bug 1820389] Re: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError (no error message)

2019-03-17 Thread Andreas Schildbach
The full exception is. java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at org.gradle.internal.classloader.FilteringClassLoader.(FilteringClassLoader.java:48) at org.gradle.initialization.DefaultClassLoaderRegistry.restrictTo(DefaultClassLoaderRegistry.java:40) at

[Bug 1695919] Re: [SRU] Fix regression by updating to Gradle 3.5/4.0

2019-03-17 Thread Andreas Schildbach
** Changed in: gradle (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695919 Title: [SRU] Fix regression by updating to Gradle 3.5/4.0 To manage

[Bug 1803855] Re: Illegal reflective access operation

2019-03-17 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I investigated into upstream bugtrackers and apparently it's a Groovy issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8339 I'm afraid I could not find out how to "starting java for gradle with --illegal-access=permit". Gradle itself doesn't take any jvm parameters. I think at the moment the

[Bug 1814133] Re: update to openjdk 11 in 18.04 LTS

2019-03-16 Thread Andreas Schildbach
4) Android builds are entirely broken with OpenJDK 11. Apparently, you'd be forced to upgrade Android Gradle plugin to at least 3.1.0 to be compatible to OpenJDK 11. Ubuntu/Debian still has version 2.2.2 [1]! But even if you upgrade to 3.1.0 manually (bypassing apt), you'd break reproducable

[Bug 1695919] Re: [SRU] Fix regression by updating to Gradle 3.5/4.0

2019-03-15 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I think this bug can be closed now. See #6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695919 Title: [SRU] Fix regression by updating to Gradle 3.5/4.0 To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1804848] [NEW] Constant subscription requests despite being denied

2018-11-23 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: I keep getting subscription requests by 2 unknown people, every couple of hours. I denied and banned these requests numerious times over the past months, but I keep getting them. Sometimes, there are 20 or more of these confirmation dialog windows open when I return to my

[Bug 1797761] [NEW] Gradle 4.4.1 package missing alternative dep to Java8

2018-10-14 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: Please provide the (alternative) dependency to openjdk-8-jre-headless again like the Bionic package did. For a lot of developers Java8 still matters (Android developers for example), and forcing them to install the Java11 packages always leads to compatibility problems. **

[Bug 1786974] Re: Nginx is starting before IPv6 address is ready

2018-08-14 Thread Andreas Schildbach
By the way, I've got all IP addresses hardcoded in /etc/network/interfaces, so there should not be a delay between IPv4 and IPv6. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786974 Title: Nginx

[Bug 1786974] Re: Nginx is starting before IPv6 address is ready

2018-08-14 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Yes, I'm binding to a specific IPv6 address. I tried your suggestion but it didn't help. # cat /etc/systemd/system/nginx.service.d/override.conf [Unit] After=network-online.target Wants=network-online.target After reboot, still: # service nginx status ● nginx.service - A high performance web

[Bug 1786974] [NEW] Nginx is starting before IPv6 address is ready

2018-08-14 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: After upgrading from xenial to bionic, I have this regression with nginx. On autostart after bootup, it fails Aug 14 15:51:43 xxx nginx[590]: nginx: [emerg] bind() to [xxx]:80 failed (99: Cannot assign requested address) The address is an IPv6 address. I can then do

[Bug 1786111] [NEW] fdroid signatures: 1 positional argument but 2 were given

2018-08-08 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: On 1.0.9 (bionic-proposed, possibly also cosmic), './fdroid signatures' or './fdroid signatures blabla.apk' yields: 'TypeError: extract() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given.' This renders the command useless; it appears to be broken. This is/was the upstream

[Bug 1762183] Re: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils.util'

2018-08-01 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Thanks! Version 1.0.9-1~18.04.1 fixes this bug for me. However, there is another bug to "fdroid signatures" that needs fixing: https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidserver/issues/536 (fixed upstream) ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received

[Bug 1763090] Re: Dependency alternative to openjdk-8-jdk missing

2018-08-01 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Thanks! Version 1.0.9-1~18.04.1 fixes this bug for me. However, there is another bug to "fdroid signatures" that needs fixing: https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidserver/issues/536 ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug

[Bug 1781238] Re: package virtualbox-dkms 5.2.10-dfsg-6ubuntu18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-dkms package post-installation script subprocess was killed by signal (Killed)

2018-07-12 Thread Andreas Schildbach
This is the make.log. ** Attachment added: "make.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1781238/+attachment/5162831/+files/make.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1781238] Re: package virtualbox-dkms 5.2.10-dfsg-6ubuntu18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-dkms package post-installation script subprocess was killed by signal (Killed)

2018-07-12 Thread Andreas Schildbach
It's the gcc that gets installed as a (transitive) dependency to virtualbox-dkms. Yes, I tried purging everything. Maybe secure boot is a problem? (But in this case I'd expect a meaningful error message.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1781238] Re: package virtualbox-dkms 5.2.10-dfsg-6ubuntu18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-dkms package post-installation script subprocess was killed by signal (Killed)

2018-07-12 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I tried that, as well as a "dpkg --configure -a". I even uninstalled and reinstalled all virtualbox and dkms related packages. It all led to the same hang. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1781238] [NEW] package virtualbox-dkms 5.2.10-dfsg-6ubuntu18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-dkms package post-installation script subprocess was killed by signal (Killed)

2018-07-11 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: System hangs when configuring virtualbox-dkms: Setting up virtualbox-dkms (5.2.10-dfsg-6ubuntu18.04.1) ... Removing old virtualbox-5.2.10 DKMS files... Uninstall Beginning Module: virtualbox Version: 5.2.10 Kernel: 4.15.0-24-generic (x86_64)

[Bug 1762183] Re: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils.util'

2018-07-08 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Just tested fdroidserver 1.0.8-3 from Cosmic on Bionic and it seems to work! No further dependency upgrades necessary as far as I can tell, all deps were satisfied by packages from Bionic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1763090] Re: Dependency alternative to openjdk-8-jdk missing

2018-07-08 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Just tested fdroidserver 1.0.8-3 from Cosmic on Bionic and it seems to work! No further dependency upgrades necessary as far as I can tell, all deps were satisfied by packages from Bionic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1758196] Re: Sync fdroidserver 1.0.6-1 (universe) from Debian/testing (main)

2018-07-07 Thread Andreas Schildbach
What's the plan for Bionic? The currently packaged fdroidserver 1.0.2-1 appears to be broken (unusable). Will it simply be updated to 1.0.6-1? Or will the individual bugs be fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1768610] Re: leftover conffile forces GNOME is software rendering

2018-06-14 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I'm trying the bionic version of the proposed nux-tools (4.0.8+18.04.20180613.5-0ubuntu1) and it works fine so far. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768610 Title: leftover conffile

[Bug 1767468] Re: Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04, then uninstalling unity disables hardware acceleration

2018-06-12 Thread Andreas Schildbach
** Description changed: After upgrading from 16.04 to 18.04 on a very plain Intel Skylake graphics, hardware acceleration is gone. Glxinfo and System Information report 'llvmpipe' (software rasterizer) It is caused by the file /etc/X11/Xsession.d/50_check_unity_support which can be

[Bug 1768610] Re: leftover conffile forces GNOME is software rendering

2018-06-12 Thread Andreas Schildbach
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1767468 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767468 I've set the duplicate the other way round because the original bug is already milestoned. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1767468 Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04, then uninstalling unity

[Bug 1767468] Re: Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04, then uninstalling unity disables hardware acceleration

2018-06-12 Thread Andreas Schildbach
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1768610 leftover conffile forces GNOME is software rendering -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767468 Title: Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04,

[Bug 1773846] [NEW] Fullscreen title bars (!) waste so much space

2018-05-28 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: On Xenial, I had only one title bar containing the menu to the left and the systray to the right. On Bionic, I've got three title bars: 1. Stripped down menu to the left, systray to the right 2. Current path (redundant, since this is usually in the prompt) 3. Full menu I

[Bug 1767468] Re: Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04, then uninstalling unity disables hardware acceleration

2018-05-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I'm using Ubuntu, not Xubuntu. I never tried to manually execute the script. I simply removed the file and rebooted – problem gone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767468 Title:

[Bug 1768620] Re: removal_blacklist.cfg updates

2018-05-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Note however, that *if* you uninstall Unity the system will disable hardware acceleration due to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/1767468 Maybe the uninstallation of Unity should be delayed until the above bug is fixed? -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1767468] Re: Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04 disables hardware acceleration on Intel Graphics

2018-04-28 Thread Andreas Schildbach
@Michele: Thanks, that's it. You're my personal hero of the week (-: ** Package changed: libglvnd (Ubuntu) => nux (Ubuntu) ** Summary changed: - Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04 disables hardware acceleration on Intel Graphics + Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04, then uninstalling unity disables hardware

[Bug 1767468] [NEW] Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04 disables hardware acceleration on Intel Graphics

2018-04-27 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: After upgrading from 16.04 to 18.04 on a very plain Intel Skylake graphics, hardware acceleration is gone. Glxinfo and System Information report 'llvmpipe' (software rasterizer) > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation HD Graphics 520 (rev 07) ProblemType: Bug

[Bug 1767415] [NEW] Emojis in email headers are shown MUCH too large

2018-04-27 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: See attached picture. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: thunderbird 1:52.7.0+build1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-20.21-generic 4.15.17 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-20-generic x86_64 AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7

[Bug 1763090] [NEW] Dependency alternative to openjdk-8-jdk missing

2018-04-11 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: The current dependency declarations force me to either install Java7 or Java9. Java8 (openjdk-8-jdk) is missing from the list of alternatives. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: fdroidserver (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-13.14-generic

[Bug 1762183] [NEW] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils.util'

2018-04-08 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: The package fdroidserver seems to be missing a dependency on Bionic: $ fdroid update Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/fdroid", line 24, in import fdroidserver.common File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/fdroidserver/common.py", line 52, in

[Bug 1760359] Re: Regression: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(I)Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer;

2018-04-04 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Thanks Steve for the clarification. I personally feel the (forced) move to Java9 comes too early, as I just have moved my Android projects to Java8 with quite some headache. But I guess I have to adapt. Here is the output of gradle under openjdk-9. The first 5 lines are always the same

[Bug 1760359] Re: Regression: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(I)Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer;

2018-04-01 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I think the issue that Gradle has been updated to the Debian experimental version 3.4.1. Before, it was synched to "unstable" 3.2.1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1760359 Title:

[Bug 1760359] [NEW] Regression: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(I)Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer;

2018-03-31 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: Since a couple of days, gradle doesn't work on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS any more on openjdk8. Installing openjdk9 kind of works around this problem, but it throws a couple of scary illegal access warnings instead. Just a days ago, everything worked fine so there must have been some

[Bug 1755607] Re: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot nest operations in the same thread. Each nested operation must run in its own thread.

2018-03-14 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I worked around this problem by manually installing the junit package (3.8.2-9). Note that the gradle package transitively declares a dependency to junit4, but seems to strictly require JUnit 3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1683761] Re: undefined symbol: tgetent

2018-03-13 Thread Andreas Schildbach
With todays update of libnative-platform-java/jni, this issue is fixed in 18.04. Thanks again! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683761 Title: undefined symbol: tgetent To manage

[Bug 1754896] Re: Sync libnative-platform-java 0.14-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-03-13 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I can confirm the fix arrived in 18.04 and works as intended. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754896 Title: Sync libnative-platform-java 0.14-3 (universe) from Debian unstable

[Bug 1695919] Re: [SRU] Fix regression by updating to Gradle 3.5/4.0

2018-03-13 Thread Andreas Schildbach
With todays update of libnative-platform-java/jni, this issue is fixed in 18.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695919 Title: [SRU] Fix regression by updating to Gradle 3.5/4.0 To

[Bug 1755607] [NEW] java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot nest operations in the same thread. Each nested operation must run in its own thread.

2018-03-13 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: In the test phase of several of my projects, I get an exception repeated many times (one for each test?). I tested manually installed gradles too and the issue is present on 3.2.1 too but seems fixed in 3.3. Cannot nest operations in the same thread. Each nested operation

[Bug 1683761] Re: undefined symbol: tgetent

2018-03-10 Thread Andreas Schildbach
FWIW, Debian import freeze for bionic was already on March 1. According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianImportFreeze "After this date, packages will only be imported from Debian in this way by explicit request from a developer." -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1683761] Re: undefined symbol: tgetent

2018-03-09 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Laurent, thanks a lot for looking into this! Is there a particular action needed for starting the Debian sync? I'm asking because apparently there was no Debian sync for the last 1 year. At least that's the time the package has been broken in the various Ubuntu releases that happened since then.

[Bug 1683761] Re: undefined symbol: tgetent

2018-03-07 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Sadly, Gradle in the current beta of upcoming 18.04 LTS is broken in the same way, too. Packages: gradle 3.2.1-5 libnative-platform-jni 0.14-2 libnative-platform-java 0.14-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1695919] Re: [SRU] Fix regression by updating to Gradle 3.5/4.0

2018-03-07 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Sadly, Gradle in the current beta of upcoming 18.04 LTS is broken in the same way, too. Packages: gradle 3.2.1-5 libnative-platform-jni 0.14-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695919

[Bug 1721215] Re: Fails to start with Ubuntu 17.10: undefined symbol tgetent

2017-11-20 Thread Andreas Schildbach
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1683761 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683761 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1683761 undefined symbol: tgetent -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1695919] Re: Fix regression by updating to Gradle 3.5/4.0

2017-06-16 Thread Andreas Schildbach
** Summary changed: - Fix regression by updating to Gradle 3.5 + Fix regression by updating to Gradle 3.5/4.0 ** Description changed: Gradle 3.2.1 on Ubuntu 17.04 is currently entirely broken ("java: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/jni/libnative-platform-curses.so: undefined symbol:

[Bug 1683761] Re: undefined symbol: tgetent

2017-06-05 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Thanks Mateusz, I added an "update request" issue to the Gradle package: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gradle/+bug/1695919 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683761 Title:

[Bug 1695919] [NEW] Fix regression by updating to Gradle 3.5

2017-06-05 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: Gradle 3.2.1 on Ubuntu 17.04 is currently entirely broken ("java: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/jni/libnative-platform-curses.so: undefined symbol: tgetent", see https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683761). One way to fix this would be to update Gradle to version 3.5, as it

[Bug 1683761] Re: undefined symbol: tgetent

2017-04-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
** Package changed: gradle (Ubuntu) => libnative-platform-java (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683761 Title: undefined symbol: tgetent To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1238322] Re: gradle not working: symbol lookup error

2017-04-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I filed the regression in zesty as a new bug, since this one is old and was apparently fixed. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gradle/+bug/1683761 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1683761] [NEW] undefined symbol: tgetent

2017-04-18 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: This is a regression in zesty: When starting gradle, I always get java: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/jni/libnative-platform-curses.so: undefined symbol: tgetent Apparently, this is a recurring bug. It was also present in 13.10:

[Bug 1649428] [NEW] Cannot open file from https location (URL)

2016-12-12 Thread Andreas Schildbach
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: If I try, I get this GIMP message: Opening 'https://[...]' failed: Could not load 'https://[...]': Failed to open file 'https://[...]': open() failed: No such file or directory Most of the time, I can manually edit

[Bug 1557957] Re: Can't pull translations from Transifex

2016-09-04 Thread Andreas Schildbach
This bug has just been fixed in Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=817038#26 Can someone sync the package to Xenial and Yakkety? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1613894] [NEW] Update package to 0.12.2

2016-08-16 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: Source can be found on GitHub: https://github.com/transifex/transifex- client/releases/tag/0.12.2 The current version in the repos is not functional any more, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transifex-client/+bug/1557957 ** Affects: transifex-client (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1557957] Re: Can't pull translations from Transifex

2016-05-12 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Here is the upstream bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=817038 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #817038 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=817038 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1570947] Re: Trusty to Xenial upgrade KeyError: 'SUDO_UID'

2016-04-16 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Trying to upgrade from 15.10 (x86 64bit) and I've got the issue too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570947 Title: Trusty to Xenial upgrade KeyError: 'SUDO_UID' To manage

[Bug 1511945] Re: Failed "Merge All", TypeError: merge_all_non_conflicting_changes() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)

2015-11-04 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Thanks for the confirmation! Is there a process to fix this in Ubuntu too? It is appropriate to set this issue to "confirmed" status? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1511945 Title:

[Bug 1511945] Re: Failed "Merge All", TypeError: merge_all_non_conflicting_changes() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)

2015-11-04 Thread Andreas Schildbach
** Changed in: meld (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1511945 Title: Failed "Merge All", TypeError: merge_all_non_conflicting_changes() takes

[Bug 1511945] [NEW] Failed "Merge All", TypeError: merge_all_non_conflicting_changes() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)

2015-10-31 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: Since updating to Ubuntu Wily when resolving a git merge conflict with meld I get this message in the console when using "Merge All" from the menu. TypeError: merge_all_non_conflicting_changes() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given) The "Merge All" doesn't do anything. I'd

[Bug 1511931] [NEW] OpenJDK 8 support

2015-10-31 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: Currently the Gradle package depends on default-jre-headless (openjdk-7 -jre-headless) but I think it would also run on openjdk-8-jre-headless. Could you allow this as an alternative? ** Affects: gradle (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description

[Bug 1511931] Re: OpenJDK 8 support

2015-10-31 Thread Andreas Schildbach
If you look at the Scala package I think the dependency could be done like that: http://packages.ubuntu.com/wily/scala -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1511931 Title: OpenJDK 8 support

[Bug 1009508] Re: Upgrade to version 2.5

2015-10-31 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Gradle 2.5 is now in Ubuntu Wily so I think this wishlist item can be closed. Thanks to the people who made this possible! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009508 Title: Upgrade to

[Bug 1511933] [NEW] OpenJDK 8 support

2015-10-31 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: Currently the Groovy package depends on default-jre-headless (openjdk-7 -jre-headless) but I think it would also run on openjdk-8-jre-headless or (even better) on the generic java7-runtime-headless (which allows future Java 7 compatible runtimes) . Could you allow this as an

[Bug 1511933] [NEW] OpenJDK 8 support

2015-10-31 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Public bug reported: Currently the Groovy package depends on default-jre-headless (openjdk-7 -jre-headless) but I think it would also run on openjdk-8-jre-headless or (even better) on the generic java7-runtime-headless (which allows future Java 7 compatible runtimes) . Could you allow this as an

[Bug 995332] Re: Please enhance NetworkManager such that DNSSEC validation is done whenever possible

2015-10-21 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Does anyone have instructions for how to configure this by hand on a desktop Ubuntu vivid or wily installation? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995332 Title: Please

[Bug 995332] Re: Please enhance NetworkManager such that DNSSEC validation is done whenever possible

2015-10-21 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Does anyone have instructions for how to configure this by hand on a desktop Ubuntu vivid or wily installation? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995332 Title: Please enhance

[Bug 1489584] Re: OpenJDK 8 support

2015-10-11 Thread Andreas Schildbach
I am and was using all kinds of versions of keytool. I never had any problem. I'd say as long as the reason for the lock-to-java8 is unknown, remove it. It's causing a headache with my setup. If in future we find out about an issue with keytool, the right was to deal with that is backporting the

[Bug 1296224] Re: Horrible noise via DisplayPort [regression]

2015-10-03 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Thanks, I now posted to the right mailing list: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/077193.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296224 Title: Horrible noise

[Bug 1296224] Re: Horrible noise via DisplayPort [regression]

2015-10-03 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Sorry, too many instructions and too many dead ends in those. I just appended the info that I missed out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296224 Title: Horrible noise via DisplayPort

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >