Workaround found! Issue was systemd not providing /var/run/utmp
added a script to /etc/rc.local that does
if [ ! -f /var/run/utmp ]
then
cat /dev/null > /var/run/utmp ; chown root:utmp /var/run/utmp
fi
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 3:16 AM Anthony Godshall
<1813...@bugs.launchpad.net&
** Attachment added: "who.strace.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813052/+attachment/5537446/+files/who.strace.txt
** Attachment added: "dpkg_-l.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813052/+attachment/5537447/+files/dpkg_-l.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Please find attached the dpkg -l output and the strace of who output.
This is from Ubuntu 20.04 running lightdm and cinnamon desktop.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:06 PM A Godshall wrote:
>
> It was fixed by pinning versions in Ubuntu 16.04.
>
> It only just recurred in Ubuntu 20.04.
>
> When I'm
It was fixed by pinning versions in Ubuntu 16.04.
It only just recurred in Ubuntu 20.04.
When I'm back in the office I will see if I can identify the versions
affected and whether rolling back packages fixed it again.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021, 4:20 PM Dan Streetman <1813...@bugs.launchpad.net>
bump
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:50 AM A Godshall wrote:
>
> Thanks Andrey.
>
> DDs and UDs: would /var/lib/dpkg/info/guacamole.postinst be the right
> place for those commands?
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 2:00 AM Andrey de Oliveira
> wrote:
> >
> > A correction to my previous post:
> >
> >
Public bug reported:
per https://github.com/pwr/Solaar/issues/325, 2.5 years ago, the version
distributed by ubuntu was already obsolete.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: solaar 0.9.2+dfsg-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-20.21~18.04.1-generic 4.18.20
Uname: Linux
Thanks Oliver.
Reported at
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=944295
Tony
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:30 PM A Godshall wrote:
>
> OK, maybe here? But lots of those are Chrome browser, not chromium-browser.
>
>
OK, maybe here? But lots of those are Chrome browser, not chromium-
browser.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?can=2=component%3AUI>Browser
Oliver?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:22 AM A Godshall wrote:
>
> > > Could you please file an upstream bug report at
> > >
> > Could you please file an upstream bug report at
> > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list and share the link
> > here?
>
> OK, I'll try to do that.
Um, that's a no-go. That appears to be for chromium the operating
system rather than the browser.
Tony
--
You received this bug
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:55 AM Olivier Tilloy
wrote:
>
> Are there any extensions installed on those profiles that get corrupted?
No extensions.
> Could you please file an upstream bug report at
> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list and share the link
> here?
OK, I'll try to do
I've narrowed down to $HOME/.config/chromium/Default/Preferences. When I
kill all the chromium-browser processes and restore that file to a prior
version, chromium-browser starts normally.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I think the behavioral component may be to log the browser in to google.
People who ignore that and don't confuse logging browser in and logging into
gmail seem to hit this less.
** Also affects: chromium-browser (Debian)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug
Affects users on xenial and Debian stretch as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814936
Title:
chromium-browser fails to start, with message
[...:ERROR:data_store_impl.cc(131)]
Thanks Andrey.
DDs and UDs: would /var/lib/dpkg/info/guacamole.postinst be the right
place for those commands?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 2:00 AM Andrey de Oliveira wrote:
>
> A correction to my previous post:
>
> Instead of creating this link:
>
> ln -s
Public bug reported:
ps shows chromium-browser processes are running, but no windows appear.
I've been able to correlate the message
"[...:ERROR:data_store_impl.cc(131)] Failed to open Data Reduction Proxy
DB: 3" with this failure mode.
Users are frustrated when it happens to them, and advice
Hi Hans.
I'm going to guess it was /var/log/syslog, but I don't have my notes.
That appears to be where it logs by default, and I don't recall having
changed that.
Tony
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:05 AM Hans Joachim Desserud
<1806...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> Could you add some more details
Hi again Hans.
Also look in /var/log/tomcat8/catalina.out maybe
Tony
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:35 PM A Godshall wrote:
>
> Hi Hans.
>
> I'm going to guess it was /var/log/syslog, but I don't have my notes.
>
> That appears to be where it logs by default, and I don't recall having
> changed
reassign 1813052 systemd
thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813052
Title:
who returns no results
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
it again, until the packages are
fixed.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:17 PM A Godshall wrote:
>
> Oh, and to be clear, this is a regression.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 11:15 AM Anthony Godshall wrote:
>>
>> Attempting to diagnose, I had added /var/run/utmp and /var/run/utmpx
Oh, and to be clear, this is a regression.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 11:15 AM Anthony Godshall Attempting to diagnose, I had added /var/run/utmp and /var/run/utmpx as
> directories. I just removed those, same empty result:
> # who
> # who;echo $?
> 0
> # strace who
> execve(&qu
Attempting to diagnose, I had added /var/run/utmp and /var/run/utmpx as
directories. I just removed those, same empty result:
# who
# who;echo $?
0
# strace who
execve("/usr/bin/who", ["who"], [/* 21 vars */]) = 0
brk(NULL) = 0x1726000
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap",
Public bug reported:
Who returns no results on xenial.
Here's an strace. I don't see any obvious difference between it and an
strace on a system that works (an unupdated xenial or a bionic system).
# strace who
execve("/usr/bin/who", ["who"], [/* 21 vars */]) = 0
brk(NULL)
correction below
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:31 PM A Godshall wrote:
>
> > I'm somewhat curious why your listing seems to still include the
> > guacamole-tomcat package and being version 0.8.3-1.2, when the bionic
> > repositories offer 0.9.9+dfsg-1. Looks like you might have some of the
> > older
> I'm somewhat curious why your listing seems to still include the
> guacamole-tomcat package and being version 0.8.3-1.2, when the bionic
> repositories offer 0.9.9+dfsg-1. Looks like you might have some of the
> older package versions which might be causing issues.
Apparently I wasn't clear.
Public bug reported:
An install via apt in ubuntu 16.04 xenial works
fine, but an install on 18.04 bionic (specifically,
ubuntu-mate) fails to produce a working system.
Logs report missing guacamole.war file.
Downloading the packages from xenial and installing
them produces a working system,
OK, this bug report is about gaucamole, guacd, and guacamole-tomcat.
I don't understand why it still says guacamole-client above-
I saw that previously and carefully navigated to guacamole-tomcat,
which routed me to guacamole, and I accepted that.
Clearly there is something I'm not groking
still an issue as of 16.10
root@tony-Satellite-S55t-C:~/ixxat# grep . /etc/issue
Ubuntu 16.10 \n \l
what's the problem here? why is it dropped?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403911
There seems to be a persistent bug affecting legacy CUPS servers. The
primary cups binary has apparently not been fixed, but cups14 remains,
presumably as a workaround. In my case, I moved aside
/usr/lib/cups/backend/ipp and then
# ln -sf /usr/lib/cups/backend/ipp14 /usr/lib/cups/backend/ipp
#
I meant ... a persistent bug affecting *interaction with* legacy CUPS
servers ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038667
Title:
cups network printing doesn't work ubuntu 12.04 server
Public bug reported:
$ chromium-browser
[2814:2839:1114/141949:FATAL:nss_util.cc(396)] NSS_VersionCheck(3.14.3)
failed. NSS = 3.14.3 is required. Please upgrade to the latest NSS, and if you
still get this error, contact your distribution maintainer.
$
this fixes it:
# apt-get install libnss3
SOLVED
Hi again. Sorry about the last two comments. I was in a carpool on
CA-17 when I wrote them. I think. Anyway, I tried many of the above on
my LT3103u and the only one that worked for me was passing nomodeset
(not any of the modeset=0 variants) on the kernel commandline (first
tested
I have a Gateway LT3103u.
I've finally found a way to reproduce the corruption I experience
reliably- I point Firefox 7 at http://google.com/nexus . Not sure what
it is on that site that triggers it, but
I've had corruption on Natty 64 bit and Maverick 64 bit too and am
currently running lucid
Sorry about the truncated above. I just testted this site, and get the
same result as wess (as above)
Not sure what it is on that site that triggers it, but
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
upgrade to natty failed with some of the couchdesktop packages. doing
an apt-get update of the depended upon packages solved it.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: python-desktopcouch-records 1.0.7-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864328
Title:
package python-desktopcouch-records 1.0.7-0ubuntu2 failed to
install/upgrade: trying to overwrite
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bash-completion
For example, with a common USB drive that mounts as /media/My Passport
...
# mount|grep sdb1
/dev/sdb1 on /media/My Passport type vfat
(rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks,uid=1999,gid=1999,shortname=mixed,dmask=0077,utf8=1,flush)
# umount
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655488/+attachment/1674474/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
wishlist: bash completion could do better with umount with spaces
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655488
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
/firmware/.
I tried this after discovering that there was not a linux-restricted-
modules-common for xen-image-2.6.19-4-generic.
Hope this works for you- report back please!
Anthony Godshall
--
IPW2915 Wireless fails in Xen Dom0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94035
You received this bug notification
.
Anthony Godshall
--
IPW2915 Wireless fails in Xen Dom0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94035
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
39 matches
Mail list logo
