[Bug 1088154] Re: LDAP support broken in rpc.idmapd
Seems to be fault of nfs-utils, and not libnfsidmap2. Details in next- update. ** Package changed: libnfsidmap (Ubuntu) = nfs-utils (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088154 Title: LDAP support broken in rpc.idmapd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1088154/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1088154] Re: LDAP support broken in rpc.idmapd
I'm able to triage this bug, and it seems like the culprit is `conf_*` functions present in conffile.c (nfs-utils), which are also present in cfg.c (libnfsidmap2), and due to runtime linking, `conf_*` present in `rpc.idmapd` executable (nfs-utils) takes precedence over the `conf_*` functions present in `/lib/libnfsidmap.so.0` due to symbol search order, and therefore complicating configuration parsing. The diff attached marks the `conf_*` functions, present in `conffile.c` which seem to conflict with functions present in `cfg.c`, as `static`, and therefore fixing the conflict. For the record, I'm running `Ubuntu Precise`. Thanks ** Patch added: Fix (in quilt format, needs to go in debian/patches) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1088154/+attachment/3461680/+files/20-conffile.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088154 Title: LDAP support broken in rpc.idmapd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1088154/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1088154] [NEW] LDAP support broken in rpc.idmapd
Public bug reported: Hi, I'm trying to use LDAP support in rpc.idmapd, and I get following errors: % tail -6 /var/log/daemon.log Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: using domain: domain.tld Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: Realms list: 'DOMAIN.TLD' Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: processing 'Method' list Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: umichldap_init: Missing required information: LDAP_server LDAP_base Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: Failed in /lib/libnfsidmap/umich_ldap.so's init(), returned -1 Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: requested translation method, 'umich_ldap', is not available Following is idmapd.conf(5): % cat /etc/idmapd.conf [General] Verbosity = 10 Pipefs-Directory = /run/rpc_pipefs Domain = domain.tld # set your own domain here, if id differs from FQDN minus hostname # Domain = localdomain [Translation] Method = umich_ldap, nsswitch [UMICH_SCHEMA] LDAP_server = ldap.domain.tld LDAP_base = dc=domain,dc=tld [Mapping] Nobody-User = nobody Nobody-Group = nogroup I'm not sure why rpc.idmapd complains about lack of LDAP_server, LDAP_base keys when they're present in the corresponding section (UMICH_SCHEMA) Thanks in advance ** Affects: libnfsidmap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ldap ** Description changed: Hi, I'm trying to use LDAP support in rpc.idmapd, and I get following errors: % tail -6 /var/log/daemon.log - Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: using domain: noida.di - Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: Realms list: 'DOMAIN.TLD' + Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: using domain: domain.tld + Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: Realms list: 'DOMAIN.TLD' Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: processing 'Method' list - Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: umichldap_init: Missing required information: LDAP_server LDAP_base + Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: umichldap_init: Missing required information: LDAP_server LDAP_base Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: Failed in /lib/libnfsidmap/umich_ldap.so's init(), returned -1 Dec 9 10:18:53 bk0-srv rpc.idmapd[24360]: libnfsidmap: requested translation method, 'umich_ldap', is not available Following is idmapd.conf(5): % cat /etc/idmapd.conf [General] Verbosity = 10 Pipefs-Directory = /run/rpc_pipefs Domain = domain.tld # set your own domain here, if id differs from FQDN minus hostname # Domain = localdomain [Translation] Method = umich_ldap, nsswitch [UMICH_SCHEMA] LDAP_server = ldap.domain.tld LDAP_base = dc=domain,dc=tld [Mapping] Nobody-User = nobody Nobody-Group = nogroup - I'm not sure why rpc.idmapd complains about lack of LDAP_server, LDAP_base keys when they're present in the corresponding section (UMICH_SCHEMA) Thanks in advance -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088154 Title: LDAP support broken in rpc.idmapd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnfsidmap/+bug/1088154/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220752] Re: /etc/resolv.conf needs to be labelled correctly for SELinux
Check out the attached resolvconf.patch diff which contains resolvconf policy I wrote few days ago. I'm not able to test this policy due to lack of time. Also you might need to patch sysnetwork policy with following diff: 88 --- refpolicy-0.0.20071214-classic/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.fc 2008-02-14 20:57:46.0 +0530 +++ refpolicy-0.0.20071214/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.fc 2008-04-23 03:59:07.0 +0530 @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ /etc/dhcp3(/.*)? gen_context(system_u:object_r:dhcp_etc_t,s0) /etc/dhcp3?/dhclient.* gen_context(system_u:object_r:dhcp_etc_t,s0) +ifdef(`distro_debian',` +/etc/resolv\.conf.*-l gen_context(system_u:object_r:net_conf_t,s0) +') + ifdef(`distro_redhat',` /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/.*resolv\.conf -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:net_conf_t,s0) /etc/sysconfig/networking/profiles/.*/resolv\.conf -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:net_conf_t,s0) --- refpolicy-0.0.20071214-classic/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.if 2008-02-14 20:57:46.0 +0530 +++ refpolicy-0.0.20071214/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.if 2008-04-23 15:24:57.0 +0530 @@ -493,6 +493,10 @@ files_search_etc($1) allow $1 net_conf_t:file read_file_perms; + + ifdef(`distro_debian',` + resolvconf_read_dns_config($1) + ') ') 88 The resolvconf_read_dns_config($1) in above diff can be enclosed in an optional_policy block also, but doing this will lead to errors in compilation of other modules, e.g. apache. HTH ** Attachment added: resolvconf.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13997290/resolvconf.patch -- /etc/resolv.conf needs to be labelled correctly for SELinux https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220752] Re: /etc/resolv.conf needs to be labelled correctly for SELinux
Fixed incorrect package. ** Changed in: refpolicy (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: resolvconf = refpolicy -- /etc/resolv.conf needs to be labelled correctly for SELinux https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220752] [NEW] /etc/resolv.conf needs to be labelled correctly for SELinux
Public bug reported: resolvconf package replaces /etc/resolv.conf with a symlink to /etc/resolvconf/run/resolv.conf due to which /etc/resolv.conf doesn't get labelled properly resulting in SELinux AVC denials. The fix to this bug will be to add a entry for /etc/resolv.conf symlink to be labelled with 'system_u:object_r:net_conf_t' in SELinux policy's file contexts. ** Affects: refpolicy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- /etc/resolv.conf needs to be labelled correctly for SELinux https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 177492] Re: EXA is balls-achingly slow
Hi, The status of this bug is Fix Released. Can anyone point me to the fix. I'm not able to find it. I'm running Ubuntu Hardy (amd64) ? TIA -- Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल http://wahjava.wordpress.com/ ·-- ·- ·--- ·- ···- ·- ·--·-· --· -- ·- ·· ·-·· ·-·-·- -·-· --- -- ** Attachment added: unnamed http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13587708/unnamed -- EXA is balls-achingly slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218242] Re: DG33BU - Intel GMA 3100 - graphics driver problems
Hi, Can you paste the resolutions supported by Xorg with 'intel' driver by running xrandr in some terminal. You can also try switching to your desired resolution using xrandr. e.g. to switch to 1024x768 @ 75 Hz (vertical refresh rate), use 'xrandr -s 1024x768 -r 75' . HTH Ashish Shukla -- DG33BU - Intel GMA 3100 - graphics driver problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218242 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 218242] Re: DG33BU - Intel GMA 3100 - graphics driver problems
Radha Krishna S writes: Radha Am not at my pc right now and it would be tough for me to do as suggested, Radha but here's something that I've already done. Radha When I select 'intel' driver in the list of drivers, a default X display Radha loads up with 640 x 480 resolution. When I look into the resolutions Radha supported on the display, there is no other resolution available for Radha selection, other than 640 X 480. I'm not sure but I think it uses xrandr to query what modes are available. Which version of Ubuntu are you running when you tried this ? What kind of monitor are you using ? Radha Does that information help in any manner?? Radha Had to get to a terminal session, stop gdm, remove all xorg.conf files and Radha restart to get back to a session driven out of vesa. Or is it? vesa is a generic driver. You can try following, after stopping gdm, and wiping off xorg.conf: 1. Login to a TTY (using Ctrl-Alt-F1). 2. Execute following in one shot at your TTY. abbe [~] chateau $ Xorg ; sleep 5 ; export DISPLAY=:0 ; xrandr xrandr-output.txt ; killall Xorg 3. Now, back at TTY, xrandr-output.txt contains output of xrandr. You can also execute 'ddcprobe' in a root shell, to get list of resolutions, refresh rates supported by your monitor. ddcprobe doesn't need X running. Radha because, there was dist upgrade pushed on my PC. After the Radha upgrade, the other - Screen and Graphics settings is not Radha available anymore. Is there a way to figure out which Radha graphics driver is in use?? abbe [~] chateau $ fgrep drivers/ /var/log/Xorg.0.log HTH -- Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल http://wahjava.wordpress.com/ ·-- ·- ·--- ·- ···- ·- ·--·-· --· -- ·- ·· ·-·· ·-·-·- -·-· --- -- -- DG33BU - Intel GMA 3100 - graphics driver problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218242 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177492] Re: EXA is balls-achingly slow
Hi, I'm also experiencing similar issue on my Intel D945GNTL motherboard based desktop. I'm running xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.2.1-1ubuntu12. I've tried all workarounds mentioned above adding options MigrationHeuristics = greedy, AccelMethod = EXA, ExaNoComposite = (both false and true), but no visible change in performance. 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2772] (rev 02) Attached is the video I recorded using recordmydesktop, to demonstrate flickering happening in xterm during resizing. I'm running Ubuntu Hardy (AMD64) on 1440x900 display resolution. TIA Ashish Shukla ** Attachment added: Flickering xterm http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13567352/flickering-xterm.ogg -- EXA is balls-achingly slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177492 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188498] Re: konqueror opens new window
I've found a workaround for this bug in my Ubuntu Gutsy. To fix this bug, go to File Associations in System Settings . Select the text type. In the right pane, select Show file in embedded viewer instead of Show file in separate viewer. Check out http://www.flickr.com/photos/wahjava/2250232339/ . -- konqueror opens new window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
