[Bug 1929213] Re: Ubuntu server LVM creates clone partitions and crash installation (invalid wwn is used by udev & probert as well)

2021-06-01 Thread Bartosz Baranowski
Only attempt that was successful was when I did not use lVM and set up
everything on single drive.

I got drives from retailer, sealed in hard plastic so I doubt anyone
except factory had their hands on them. Second pair( HDDs ) I got sealed
by vendor with his sticker on it. Those two have WWN set.

It seems WWN = 0x50. is something that is common among those type of
drives. Just checked my destkop and it has at least one drive like that
as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929213

Title:
  Ubuntu server LVM creates clone partitions and crash installation
  (invalid wwn is used  by udev & probert as well)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1929213/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1929213] Re: Ubuntu server fails to install if boot is not on sda1

2021-05-24 Thread Bartosz Baranowski
Should have been: * while parted does show it as well.

Out of curiosity, I gave a go to fedora server and it seems to work(
with one minor detail when it comes to partitioning).

Im going to alter title, as it is wrong.


General flaw seems to be LVM mixing drives/CC partition table onto another:

Ubuntu headles LVM creation fails. HW setup:
2xSSD(sda,sdb)
2xHDD(sdc,sdd).

Test scenarion:
0 - /boot and /boot/efi on /sda

1(encr) vg0 on sda,sdb( /, /home, /etc, /var/log, /usr/local). vg1 on sdc,sdd( 
/srv  )
2(plain) vg0 on sda,sdb( /, /home, /etc, /var/log, /usr/local). vg1 on sdc,sdd( 
/srv  )
3(encr)  vg0 on sda,sdb( /, /home, /etc, /var/log, /usr/local).
4(plain)  vg0 on sda,sdb( /, /home, /etc, /var/log, /usr/local).
5(encr)  vg0 on sda( /, /home, /etc, /var/log, /usr/local).
6(plain)  vg0 on sda( /, /home, /etc, /var/log, /usr/local).
7(plain)  sda( /, /home, /etc, /var/log, /usr/local).

Only 7 worked. In all other cases installation failed( for some crash
logs are in tar ). With one key observation - even when only single
drive was selected, somehow second(sdb) had clones of partitions from
sda.

** Summary changed:

- Ubuntu server fails to install if boot is not on sda1
+ Ubuntu server LVM creates clone partitions and crash installation

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929213

Title:
  Ubuntu server LVM creates clone partitions and crash installation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1929213/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1929213] Re: Ubuntu server LVM creates clone partitions and crash installation

2021-05-24 Thread Bartosz Baranowski
During installation version was bumped to 21.04.xx( as per dialog
suggestion): AFAIR.

** Description changed:

- I've already sent crash report from installer, but since I'm not quite
- sure how it's handled, might as well follow up with this.
+ #I've already sent crash report from installer, but since I'm not quite
+ sure how #it's handled, might as well follow up with this.
  
- I've been tinkering with ubuntu server and some old HW. Long story short, 
since I'm not used to CLI/text like install and missed that installer reverse 
order of HDDs I ended up with disk setup where /boot, /boot/efi along with LVM 
handling root were on /sdb
- To be precise:
- sdb:
- /boot
- /boot/efi
- /lvm/root
+ #I've been tinkering with ubuntu server and some old HW. Long story short, 
since #I'm not used to CLI/text like install and missed that installer reverse 
order of #HDDs I ended up with disk setup where /boot, /boot/efi along with LVM 
handling #root were on /sdb
+ #To be precise:
+ #sdb:
+ #/boot
+ #/boot/efi
+ #/lvm/root
  
- sda:
- /lvm/root
+ #sda:
+ #/lvm/root
  
- This failed at some point with message refering boot/grub could not be
- found on /dev/sda1:
+ #This failed at some point with message refering boot/grub could not be found 
on #/dev/sda1:
+ #
+ #"could not get path to dev from kname sda1"
+ #
+ #If I set up everything on sda it works fine.
  
- "could not get path to dev from kname sda1"
- 
- If I set up everything on sda it works fine.
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1929213/comments/5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929213

Title:
  Ubuntu server LVM creates clone partitions and crash installation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1929213/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1929213] Re: Ubuntu server fails to install if boot is not on sda1

2021-05-23 Thread Bartosz Baranowski
Possibly original tittle might be wrong. Ive reset physical connections and 
BIOS, but could not reproduce ID switch. I might just have been tired and 
imagined it. Nevertheless, installation still fail.
Through trial and error one thing is clear - plain HDD install( no LVM/Crypto) 
does work like a charm.
What I found odd about his is fact that installer, seems to see partitions 
cloned after restart, while parted does not( txt and img in 
;single_drive_encr_lvm;). I'm fairly sure other iterations did produce similar 
duplication, but I just brushed it off as trash after last install - my bad?

Crash logs, with semi-descriptive dirs attached.

** Attachment added: "1929213.tar.gz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1929213/+attachment/5499657/+files/1929213.tar.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929213

Title:
  Ubuntu server fails to install if boot is not on sda1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1929213/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1929213] Re: Ubuntu server fails to install if boot is not on sda1

2021-05-21 Thread Bartosz Baranowski
Im thinkering with ubuntu server 20.10 from live USB.

I tried single drive install and it worked. Once it went live I tried minimal 
setup on two SSDs( /boot, /boot/efi and encrypted LVM with rest on both). Not 
sure if its relevant but I can see in crash report:
"adding partition 'partition-3' to disk "disk-sdb" (ptable: 'gpt')
partnum: 1 offset_Sectrors: 2048 length_sectors 500113407
Preparing partition location on disk /dev/sda


This fails with exist code: 4

For some reason Im not able to authorize apport. I will try to tinker
with single drive install and two. Will crash report be sufficient ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929213

Title:
  Ubuntu server fails to install if boot is not on sda1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1929213/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1929213] Re: Ubuntu server fails to install if boot is not on sda1

2021-05-21 Thread Bartosz Baranowski
Upon further investigation - it might be connected to BIOS screwing up
order. Part of installer see wrong order, but scripts most likely see it
differently?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929213

Title:
  Ubuntu server fails to install if boot is not on sda1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1929213/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 851104] Re: Xchat fails to save sound preference Beep.

2015-03-02 Thread Bartosz Baranowski
Seems like xchat or OS does not handle existing file properly. Simple
`rm sound.conf` and close op issued afterwards made xchat regenerate
this file with proper content.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/851104

Title:
  Xchat fails to save sound preference Beep.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xchat/+bug/851104/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs