[Bug 662840]
I often even mix multiple languages in the same text, for various reasons. In a multi-language context, this is quite common. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662840 Title: Spell checking more than one language in Firefox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/662840/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 662840]
When I wrote "can type", I meant of course with the spellchecker working in the language, assuming I have the right dictionary installed, without the spellchecker trying to tell me that **all** my _words_ are _wrong_ and _everything_ has a _red_ _underline_, which is _quite_ _annoying_. (Underline for illustration of the effect.) It would be quite a pity to do all this work in this bug, and then the spellchecker still assumes English, just because Gmail or Yahoo Mail or RoundCube or whatever web app is in English. How would RoundCube know which language I am writing the email in? I write emails (and text in webapps) in multiple languages, so this logic as stated in comment 38 would render the fix here moot in such situations and keep the spellchecker broken for all languages but one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662840 Title: Spell checking more than one language in Firefox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/662840/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 662840]
> element or document language ... is ... en-US ..., we'll only enable the en-US dictionary So, if Gmail or Yahoo or RoundCube document was set to "en-US", that means I can only type English emails? Doesn't that counter the purpose of this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662840 Title: Spell checking more than one language in Firefox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/662840/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1955870] [NEW] random_device: rdrand failed when using libsass 3.6.3 on some AMD Ryzen CPUs
Public bug reported: https://github.com/sass/libsass/issues/3151 When using an application that uses libsass, the application crashes (segfaults) with `random_device: rdrand failed`. ## Reproduction 1. Start an application that uses libsass, e.g. simply run `hugo` or `npm install node-sass` or any library that depends on it. ## Actual results ``` terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error' what(): random_device: rdrand failed Cancelled (Segfault) ``` ## Expected result Hugo, node-sass etc. work ## Version This happens on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS with libsass / libsass1 version 3.6.3. The problem is fixed in libsass 3.6.5, see https://github.com/sass/libsass/issues/3151 and https://github.com/sass/libsass/releases/tag/3.6.5 ## Cause 1. Some AMD CPUs seem to return a non-random number, but still claim success. See e.g. [reports on Twitter](https://twitter.com/FiloSottile/status/1125840275346198529). 2. `std:random_device` throws an exception. 3. libsass is unable to cope, throws the exception up into the caller. 4. The calling application cannot possibly handle this error and fails. ## Fix Update libsass from version 3.6.3 to 3.6.5. ** Affects: libsass (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: https://github.com/sass/libsass/issues/3151 When using an application that uses libsass, the application crashes (segfaults) with `random_device: rdrand failed`. ## Reproduction 1. Start an application that uses libsass, e.g. simply run `hugo` or - `npm install node-sass` or any library that depends on it. +`npm install node-sass` or any library that depends on it. ## Actual results ``` terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error' - what(): random_device: rdrand failed + what(): random_device: rdrand failed Cancelled (Segfault) ``` ## Expected result Hugo, node-sass etc. work ## Version This happens on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS with libsass / libsass1 version 3.6.3. The problem is fixed in libsass 3.6.5, see https://github.com/sass/libsass/issues/3151 and https://github.com/sass/libsass/releases/tag/3.6.5 ## Cause - 1. Some AMD CPUs seems to return a non-random number, but still claim success. See e.g. [reports on Twitter](https://twitter.com/FiloSottile/status/1125840275346198529). + 1. Some AMD CPUs seem to return a non-random number, but still claim success. See e.g. [reports on Twitter](https://twitter.com/FiloSottile/status/1125840275346198529). 2. `std:random_device` throws an exception. 3. libsass is unable to cope, throws the exception up into the caller. 4. The calling application cannot possibly handle this error and fails. - The underlying root cause is that libsass is using cryptographically - secure random numbers. Why? I don't see why CSS would need that. I would - think that pseudo-random is sufficient. - ## Fix Update libsass from version 3.6.3 to 3.6.5. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955870 Title: random_device: rdrand failed when using libsass 3.6.3 on some AMD Ryzen CPUs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsass/+bug/1955870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 849416]
Makes sense. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849416 Title: text/calendar attachments are not shown at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/seamonkey/+bug/849416/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 849416]
REOPENing. In all fairness, while it might work for developers who know what's happening, it doesn't work for end users as-is. Even strictly speaking, the original problem "calendar (VCal) [content] is not visible" is not fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849416 Title: text/calendar attachments are not shown at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/seamonkey/+bug/849416/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1853007]
I also see a large number of ns* temporary files that Thunderbird leaves behind in `/tmp/`. This is quite annoying. I've currently got almost 1000 ns* files there: ``` /tmp/nsemail-328.eml /tmp/nsemail-622.eml /tmp/nsmail-2.pdf /tmp/nsemail-329.eml /tmp/nsemail-623.eml /tmp/nsmail-2.png /tmp/nsemail-32.eml /tmp/nsemail-624.eml /tmp/nsmail-2.tmp /tmp/nsemail-330.eml /tmp/nsemail-625.eml /tmp/nsmail-30.tmp /tmp/nsemail-331.eml /tmp/nsemail-626.eml /tmp/nsmail-31.tmp /tmp/nsemail-332.eml /tmp/nsemail-627.eml /tmp/nsmail-32.tmp /tmp/nsemail-333.eml /tmp/nsemail-628.eml /tmp/nsmail-33.tmp /tmp/nsemail-334.eml /tmp/nsemail-629.eml /tmp/nsmail-34.tmp /tmp/nsemail-335.eml /tmp/nsemail-62.eml /tmp/nsmail-3.eml /tmp/nsemail-336.eml /tmp/nsemail-630.eml /tmp/nsmail-3.jpeg /tmp/nsemail-337.eml /tmp/nsemail-631.eml /tmp/nsmail-3.pdf /tmp/nsemail-338.eml /tmp/nsemail-632.eml /tmp/nsmail-3.tmp /tmp/nsemail-339.eml /tmp/nsemail-633.eml /tmp/nsmail-4.eml /tmp/nsemail-33.eml /tmp/nsemail-634.eml /tmp/nsmail-4.jpeg /tmp/nsemail-340.eml /tmp/nsemail-635.eml /tmp/nsmail-4.pdf /tmp/nsemail-341.eml /tmp/nsemail-636.eml /tmp/nsmail-4.tmp /tmp/nsemail-342.eml /tmp/nsemail-637.eml /tmp/nsmail-5.eml /tmp/nsemail-343.eml /tmp/nsemail-638.eml /tmp/nsmail-5.jpeg /tmp/nsemail-344.eml /tmp/nsemail-639.eml /tmp/nsmail-5.pdf /tmp/nsemail-345.eml /tmp/nsemail-63.eml /tmp/nsmail-5.tmp /tmp/nsemail-346.eml /tmp/nsemail-640.eml /tmp/nsmail-6.eml /tmp/nsemail-347.eml /tmp/nsemail-641.eml /tmp/nsmail-6.jpeg /tmp/nsemail-348.eml /tmp/nsemail-642.eml /tmp/nsmail-6.pdf /tmp/nsemail-349.eml /tmp/nsemail-643.eml /tmp/nsmail-6.tmp /tmp/nsemail-34.eml /tmp/nsemail-644.eml /tmp/nsmail-7.jpeg /tmp/nsemail-350.eml /tmp/nsemail-645.eml /tmp/nsmail-7.pdf /tmp/nsemail-351.eml /tmp/nsemail-646.eml /tmp/nsmail-7.tmp /tmp/nsemail-352.eml /tmp/nsemail-647.eml /tmp/nsmail-8.pdf /tmp/nsemail-353.eml /tmp/nsemail-648.eml /tmp/nsmail-8.tmp /tmp/nsemail-354.eml /tmp/nsemail-649.eml /tmp/nsmail-9.pdf /tmp/nsemail-355.eml /tmp/nsemail-64.eml /tmp/nsmail-9.tmp /tmp/nsemail-356.eml /tmp/nsemail-650.eml /tmp/nsmail.asc /tmp/nsemail-357.eml /tmp/nsemail-651.eml /tmp/nsmail.docx /tmp/nsemail-358.eml /tmp/nsemail-652.eml /tmp/nsmail.eml /tmp/nsemail-359.eml /tmp/nsemail-653.eml /tmp/nsmail.ics /tmp/nsemail-35.eml /tmp/nsemail-654.eml /tmp/nsmail.jpeg /tmp/nsemail-360.eml /tmp/nsemail-655.eml /tmp/nsmail.odt /tmp/nsemail-361.eml /tmp/nsemail-656.eml /tmp/nsmail.pdf /tmp/nsemail-362.eml /tmp/nsemail-657.eml /tmp/nsmail.png /tmp/nsemail-363.eml /tmp/nsemail-658.eml /tmp/nsmail.tmp /tmp/nsemail-364.eml /tmp/nsemail-659.eml /tmp/nsmail.zip /tmp/nsemail-365.eml /tmp/nsemail-65.eml ``` This is just an excerpt. There are many more, total 989 files. And that although I've had already cleaned them up relatively recently already. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853007 Title: nsemail and nscopy files left in /tmp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1853007/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 849416]
> the ancient early-1990s legacy ... Exchange I bet even today's Microsoft engineers fear that code. > violation of the MIME standard in the calendar function of Microsoft Exchange that sends these messages Right. "Microsoft doesn't respect Internet standards" isn't new. Thunderbird always had the policy to treat this as bug and fix it. The reality is that people working in companies send these invitations, to people inside and outside the company, and if you are unfortunate enough to use Thunderbird without Lightning, you don't even see the meeting time or location. Guess who the meeting organizer will blame? Try arguing with him that Exchange has a bug. That said, I know (comment 118, and from my own testing), the bug appeared only if you use Thunderbird without Lighting. Since Thunderbird 78, Lightning is integrated into Thunderbird core. Can somebody reproduce this bug in Thunderbird 78 with Lightning enabled? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849416 Title: text/calendar attachments are not shown at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/seamonkey/+bug/849416/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 684982]
VERIFIED FIXED on Ubuntu 20.04 beta with Gnome 3 classic and an old X11 Window Manager. THANK YOU SO MUCH ヽ(•‿•)ノ I've seen it in the trunk builds I made, and I was so happy. Just last week I thought "Ression restore considering virtual desktops would be my biggest wish for Firefox right now". And a week later, it worked. Can you imagine how happy I was? Thank you so much! If we see each other in person, I'll buy you a meal. Consider yourself hugged virtually. THANKS SO MUCH This was really great and kind. Thank you :-) Ben -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684982 Title: Firefox windows don't restore on correct workspaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/684982/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490935]
(In reply to Johannes Reiff from comment #95) > hasn't there just been any volunteer to implement the feature? Yes > I have another use-case for this feature: Many scanners nowadays can send > emails with the scan attached. By default, though, these mails have a very > generic subject. Being able to change the subject from the mail client ... > allows finding particular scans later on. > > I have been doing this in the past using the Header Tools Lite addon. This > addon, however, is not compatible with newer versions of Thunderbird. 100% exactly my problem as well. This makes scan to email very hard to use. Everything has the same subject. Get 5 at the same time, and it's impossible to manage. Scan to email is a widely advertized feature of printers, so it's not a mainstream feature, and not marginal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490935 Title: it is not possible to modify email subject To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/490935/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1845010] Re: GnuCash broken, update to 3.7 required due to banking regulation
https://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic/kmymoney-aqbanking-gnucash-und- psd2/#post-9096350 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845010 Title: GnuCash broken, update to 3.7 required due to banking regulation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnucash/+bug/1845010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1845010] Re: GnuCash broken, update to 3.7 required due to banking regulation
** Tags added: high-impact ** Also affects: libaqbanking (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: The PSD2 banking regulation requires a 2-factor authentication to access my bank account. This took effect on Sept 14 (2019-09-14). Since then, users using HCBI with the affected mechanisms cannot use HBCI anymore. *** I am locked out of by bank account *** GnuCash 3.7 and the corresponding aqbanking 5.8.2 release apparently - implement the relevant changes. This update is *required* for the - package to continue to function. The current release 2.4 no longer - works. + implement the relevant changes. This update in stable is *required* for + the package to continue to function. The current release 2.6 in bionic + no longer works. - Therefore, an emergency update is required. + Therefore, an emergency update for bionic is required. More info: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934905 ** Description changed: The PSD2 banking regulation requires a 2-factor authentication to access my bank account. This took effect on Sept 14 (2019-09-14). Since then, users using HCBI with the affected mechanisms cannot use HBCI anymore. *** I am locked out of by bank account *** GnuCash 3.7 and the corresponding aqbanking 5.8.2 release apparently implement the relevant changes. This update in stable is *required* for the package to continue to function. The current release 2.6 in bionic no longer works. - Therefore, an emergency update for bionic is required. + Therefore, an emergency update for bionic (and preferably older stable + releases as well) is required. More info: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934905 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845010 Title: GnuCash broken, update to 3.7 required due to banking regulation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnucash/+bug/1845010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1845010] [NEW] GnuCash broken, update to 3.7 required due to banking regulation
Public bug reported: The PSD2 banking regulation requires a 2-factor authentication to access my bank account. This took effect on Sept 14 (2019-09-14). Since then, users using HCBI with the affected mechanisms cannot use HBCI anymore. *** I am locked out of by bank account *** GnuCash 3.7 and the corresponding aqbanking 5.8.2 release apparently implement the relevant changes. This update is *required* for the package to continue to function. The current release 2.4 no longer works. Therefore, an emergency update is required. More info: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934905 ** Affects: gnucash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: urgent -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845010 Title: GnuCash broken, update to 3.7 required due to banking regulation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnucash/+bug/1845010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583797]
Yay, thanks so much! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583797 Title: "Warn on closing with multiple tabs open" not honored To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/583797/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1509562] Re: no icons for menu, folders, directories, files
I saw this bug in Kate and in Gwenview (and probably other KDE apps). Most buttons had no icons at all for me. I had used Menta from MATE as icon theme. The last comment fixed it. Particularly, selecting "Oxygen" as theme in "KDE system settings" (step 3 above) helped. Ubuntu: Please fix this. Given that most buttons are icon-only, this bug seriously affects usability. 2 fixes are needed here: a) Add all icons to all themes (reasonable expectation that I can install KDE apps in Mate and Gnome, and that all offered themes work) b) There's already the concept of a fallback theme. Set dependencies / install scripts to ensure that the fallback theme contains all icons for all apps, including KDE apps. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509562 Title: no icons for menu, folders, directories, files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dolphin/+bug/1509562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 517021] Re: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage
Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote on 06.05.2015 20:01: ** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released Fix tested and confirmed in Ubuntu 12.04 Precise. Before, I reproducibly ran into this bug when saving a data: URL from a Firefox-based webapp to a local file using the normal Firefox download dialog. I installed the Precise update from the normal Precise update package repositories. I save now, and I do not see the 100% CPU usage anymore. Bug fixed. Thanks a lot to Ross Lagerwall,Tomas Bzate, Alexander Larsson, Ondrej Holy (all GNOME https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637095), Monsta, Marc Deslauriers (here) and everybody else involved! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021 Title: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/517021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 517021] Re: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage
Monsta wrote on 21.04.2015 12:47: ** Attachment added: debdiff with the fix for Precise https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/517021/+attachment/4380477/+files/gvfs-precise-debdiff Thank you! :-) What's the process of getting this into the release distro? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021 Title: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/517021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517021] Re: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage
The Bug 637095 is no longer available, where should we find a patch? Not the one here, but on gnome. From comment #49: apply mentioned patch from upstream Bug 637095 to fix problems with metadata: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637095 --- This must be backported to Precise (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS), too. Precise is still suported, and this is trashing hardware. ** Tags added: hang precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021 Title: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/517021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
So, top of the dropdown then? No, the bottom is fine. We don't want this to be prominent. Furthermore, the end makes sense, because this should only be used when none of the other From addresses are OK. It's kind of a more option. *All* the options in the dropdown change the textfield value. The custom is the least that you should use, so it belongs at the bottom. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
Last but not least, we should probably add a one-time warning dialog, like proposed in comment 142. Aside from this (and reviews of course), this works very well, it's good UI, and I think it's ready to land. The UI interaction is fairly natural and very intuitive. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
Created attachment 8581305 Screenshot of normal dropdown (Linux) This shows the dropdown when it's not yet editable. I can select identities like before. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
When I select an identity, click Customize From Address, and edit it, I then can still select other identities, and they will apply. That's good. But when I select the same identity that I originally selected, I do not return to the original From address, but my edited one stays. That's odd. I'd argue that all dropdown entries should behave the same and reset the edit field's value. However, that's a minor thing and also debatable. I wouldn't hold the commit for that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
Created attachment 8581307 Screenshot of editable field (Linux) After clicking on the last entry of the dropdown, labeled Customize From Address, the field is editable (it's now a combobox). When changing the value, it continues to use the identity that was selected before, but uses the entered From address. I verified with 2 different accounts that this is really the case: Different SMTP servers were used, depending on which identity was selected first. Please note that there's a minor UI glitch here: We have 2 dropdown arrows, as you can see in the screenshot. They both have the same effect. When clicking the right one, the left one even shows a pressed state. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 517021] Re: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage
Philip, when I said Please make noise, I didn't meant that you should make 100 comments in the bug. I meant to raise awareness of the bug at the Ubuntu maintainers who decide which hotfixes to include in a LTS release. I don't know how that works. Ben Philip J Reilly wrote, On 08.03.2015 18:59: https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/index.php?topic=1688.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021 Title: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/517021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517021] Re: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage
See the remote bug watches on the right here. It links to gnome-bugs #637095 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637095 , which is FIXED. Given that this bug can trash SSDs on hardware level, by making so many writes that the lifespan is considerably reduced, by doing billions of write calls in a matter of hours, I'm asking for a hotfix in Ubuntu 12.04 precise. Given that SSDs are silent, a user wouldn't even notice this unless he has a CPU or disk meter or similar showing. I do, but I still missed this once and it ran for 10 hours overnight IIRC. How can we escalate this for a hotfix in a stable distro? I don't know launchpad well enough. Could somebody please make some noise? There's already a straight-forward fix, and commited to the GNOME repo, it's just a matter of shipping it for the stable Ubuntu distros. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021 Title: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/517021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517021] Re: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage
Philip, the reproduction using Firefox has been investigated and confirmed to be a gvfs bug (not Firefox bug), and has already been FIXED (!) in the GNOME bug that I've been linking above. This is just Ubuntu being inactive in shipping the fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021 Title: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/517021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517021] Re: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gvfs - My disk space was really full at one moment, no byte left free. People say, that does corrupt the files in the ~/.local/share/gvfs-metadata folder, so the gvfsd-metadata can't read it without being screwed up. - Workaround: run rm -rf ~/.local/share/gvfs-metadata + Failure to write metadata results in an infinite loop that keeps trying + to write, thousands of times per second. - Expected results: - gvfsd-metadata should be able to handle the no space left situation. + Steps to reproduce: + 1. Open Firefox + 2. Save a data: URL (very long URL, usually generated by webapps or extensions) as file + + Actual result: + - File is saved + - 100% CPU + - Extremely high number of file operations by gvfs - billions + - Never stops + + Expected result: + Failure to write metadata should just fail, not try again + + Fix: + Patch available and accepted by GNOME + https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637095 + --- Original description --- After installing 9.10 Ubuntu 64bit browsing and opening folder in nautilus or Gnome-commander take several minutes when there are many files in it e.g. 10.000. Interestingly Midnight-commander does not have this problem. Opening such folders does not hang with MC. Using top i can see that gvfsd-metadata is using 100% CPU and when i kill it the computer stops hanging. I am using the 32bit version of Karmic too and there is no such Problem (although tested on a different computer). Please fix this because it is highly annyoing. Right now i am killing it every 20s with the watch command to be able to work at all. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gvfs Failure to write metadata results in an infinite loop that keeps trying to write, thousands of times per second. Steps to reproduce: 1. Open Firefox - 2. Save a data: URL (very long URL, usually generated by webapps or extensions) as file + 2. Save a data: URL (URL that contains the content, with several thousands bytes, often generated by webapps or extensions) as file + + (There are other ways to run into this problem, e.g. disk full or other + error situations. data: URLs are just the easiest way to reproduce.) Actual result: - File is saved - 100% CPU - Extremely high number of file operations by gvfs - billions - Never stops Expected result: Failure to write metadata should just fail, not try again Fix: Patch available and accepted by GNOME https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637095 - --- Original description --- After installing 9.10 Ubuntu 64bit browsing and opening folder in nautilus or Gnome-commander take several minutes when there are many files in it e.g. 10.000. Interestingly Midnight-commander does not have this problem. Opening such folders does not hang with MC. Using top i can see that gvfsd-metadata is using 100% CPU and when i kill it the computer stops hanging. I am using the 32bit version of Karmic too and there is no such Problem (although tested on a different computer). Please fix this because it is highly annyoing. Right now i am killing it every 20s with the watch command to be able to work at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021 Title: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/517021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
FWIW, this is why I financed this patch and paid Neil to implement it, in core TB. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
Comment on attachment 8572084 Possible patch Review of attachment 8572084: - Options menu is the wrong place for this. If a checkbox, it should be in Account Settings. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
Given the questioning about the nature of this, why is this being promoted as a core feature instead of as an addon? It seems to me this is exactly why we have addons. Please. You have to stop questioning features *after* they are implemented. This bug is almost 14 years (!) old, and Mozilla always had addons, that's plenty of time to raise objections like that, not when there's a patch ready to land. I an using the Virtual Identity addon since many years, but that very fact that I need certain addons (I can't use Thunderbird without them), and that they are not always up-to-date, prevents me from using Thunderbird trunk. I'd like to use a stock Thunderbird trunk build, at least for my most important needs, without depending on addons for everyday work. I currently have to use an age-old Thunderbird (which is insecure), because of the addons. Addons are good for integration with your telephony provider, but not for basic emailing needs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
(In reply to Ben Bucksch from comment #129) * If you really want to pref this feature away, I think the best way would be a checkbox in Account Settings... | Manage Identities So, the presence of the customize option would depend on which identity you had selected? No, I'd make it so that only one identity can have this checkbox checked (in Account Settings), and that one identity would always be used for custom email addresses. That said, I do *not* think that we should pref this away. I think Neil's patch was just fine. But I can see the argument. Personally, I'd just add a one-time message that explains the feature and warns people. Nnormally, you should add your email addresses in Account Setup. This feature here is for users who want to use a custom author email address depending on their recipient, for example josh+ama...@gmail.com or ama...@josh-family.org. It is only for your own email addresses. Impersonating other people may be subject to punishment by law. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
that's when we're all whacking our heads on our desks This could be solved with a one-time (i.e.: [ ] Show this again) message dialog explaining the feature with a simple 4-line text. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
(In reply to Josiah Bruner [:JosiahOne] (needinfo CC) from comment #125) UI-Review: - Customize From Address is confusing. “Enter a custom address” perhaps? Agreed. - What if users try to use it as a separate address and they don’t actually have the account added to TB. Any replies to it will never show up. * (I'm thinking of naive users who think they can enter whatever address they own here without bothering to add the actual account, and expect us to add it automatically or something. - Is this going to encourage spam sending? I can send a message as “barackob...@usa.gov” now. I understand the capability was there already, but now it’s going to be even easier to do. This feature could be seriously abused. You question this whole feature, its very nature. Spammers don't need Thunderbird, they have specialized tools. And spammers already do this in billions. This feature might actually help educating users how easy it is to forge email addresses, and to be more careful when they see From: i...@paypal.com Please update your address. - What server are we actually sending this message through? We should probably have some capability to choose which one. * If you really want to pref this feature away, I think the best way would be a checkbox in Account Settings... | Manage Identities * If we insist that only one account can have this checkbox checked, it would solve the which SMTP server question * But it would make this feature very obscure and hard to find. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
Josiah, sorry, I mis-attributed. I agree with your comment 102. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
As for UX, I agree with Neil: Most common action would be to select from the dropdown, so that should be the big click target (most of the widget), and the free edit should be an smaller Edit button. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357864]
josiah: Ping -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357864 Title: Editing the From field for the current email only (as text, not dropdown) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/357864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539226]
xref bug 1058177 - gvfs within firefox process using 100% disk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539226 Title: firefox(-gnome-support) should be compiled with Gio support instead GnomeVFS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/539226/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105088]
xref bug 1058177 - gvfs within firefox process using 100% disk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105088 Title: Thunderbird does not honor gnome-vfs paths To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/105088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517021] Re: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage
Because some people here apparently treat silence as I guess this is fixed, I'll spam here and say this keeps happening for me regularly as well. I've tried various things, killing the process, killing the directory IIRC, but it keeps coming back with 100%, maybe once a week or so, but it's irregular. 1. I've probably seen 100 posts on the Internet saying to delete the metadata folder, but that's not a solution: Even if it does get corrupted, the program MUST NOT go crazy and into an infinite loop or hog the CPU. That said, I do NOT think that metadata file corruption is the problem, because the problem keeps coming back for me. 2. I have huge NFS drives with many files mounted. If it tries to index or capture them, then it's sure to cause problems. People above said that it tries to index Samba drives. That's massively misguided and should not happen. It should only index local drives. Network drives can be huge, and often contain data that's not important to this user, but to other employees. In my case, it's media files (TV recordings, music etc.), but still *way* too huge to be indexed on the client. Even attempting to do this is braindead (this is technical term, not an insult). 3. Last, but most importantly, no program has the right to index all my drives without my *explicit* permission. Ask me, once. Give me a choice of which drives I want indexed, and where that index should be stored. This can be dangerous. People regularly keep private stuff on a physical USB drive, for the explicit reason to not leave trails on the local computer - whatever reason they might have. Having metadata about files stored on a *different* drive (partition) is a privacy threat by its very nature and should never be done without explicit user approval. This stuff is totally misguided and should be disabled RIGHT NOW, then fixed, then it can be enabled again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021 Title: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/517021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517021] Re: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage
** Tags added: private ** Tags added: freeze hang ** Tags removed: private ** Tags added: privacy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517021 Title: gvfsd-metadata causes 100% CPU usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/517021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490935]
Previous headers should be recorded as X-Original-headername, e.g.: X-Original-Subject: Re: How are you? Subject: Appointment to discuss Bla project If X-Original-Foo already exists, it is *not* overwritten. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490935 Title: it is not possible to modify email subject To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/490935/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490935]
Why this is important: 1. You personally may not, but many users have fax-email services. For them, this feature is absolutely necessary. For a long time, I didn't realize that there was an extension that allows it and works well, the lack of which causing me a lot of pain. 2. If people set bad subjects for important emails (e.g. by just hitting reply on an unrelated subject), I can either get angry at them (because I will not find it anymore in one week), or ask them to fix it in the future, or I can fix it myself in my mail store. The latter, however, I can only do with this feature. 3. Many other people have wrong clocks on their computers, and Thunderbird sorts folders by the message send time that the sender put in. I recently received a mail which was exactly one month off. Completely confused me in the folder view. I can't fix it, without this feature. (Arguably, Thunderbird should sort better.) This is similar to delete attachment feature. That's also a feature that we didn't have for a long time, and some said we didn't want it, they said it's freaky and wrong. Finally, we added it - and it's indispensable, as it turned out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490935 Title: it is not possible to modify email subject To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/490935/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1051559]
Agreed, MPEG TS is definitely needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051559 Title: Build Firefox with GStreamer support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1051559/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1051559]
Testcase (MP4 video): http://www.bucksch.org/xfer/montee.mpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051559 Title: Build Firefox with GStreamer support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1051559/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1051559]
VERIFIED FIXED Clicking on a link which URL goes directly to an MPEG4 file (mimetype video/mp4) plays the video. Clicking on an MPEG2 file (mimetype video/mpeg) does not work, it shows the download Save as... dialog. This is unfortunate, but unfortunately intended (comment 5). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051559 Title: Build Firefox with GStreamer support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1051559/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1051559]
Correction: Testcase MPEG2 video, mimetype video/mpeg: http://www.bucksch.org/xfer/montee.mpg Testcase MPEG4 video, mimetype video/mp4: http://www.bucksch.org/xfer/walter-roehrl-short.mp4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051559 Title: Build Firefox with GStreamer support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1051559/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1051559]
Thanks, guys! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051559 Title: Build Firefox with GStreamer support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1051559/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1057851] [NEW] package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed with error code 2 during do-release-upgrade
Public bug reported: dovecot-pop3d is also installed ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-23.75-server Uname: Linux 2.6.31-23-server x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu13 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Sep 28 02:44:14 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 2 zurück SourcePackage: cyrus-imapd-2.4 Title: package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 2 zurück UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-09-28 (0 days ago) ** Affects: cyrus-imapd-2.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057851 Title: package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed with error code 2 during do- release-upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-imapd-2.4/+bug/1057851/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1057851] Re: package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed with error code 2 during do-release-upgrade
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057851 Title: package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed with error code 2 during do- release-upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-imapd-2.4/+bug/1057851/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748874]
no, not the same bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748874 Title: plaintext domain gets HTML mail To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/748874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748874]
need more info. this feature does work in general (see bug 401014, where it actually matches too often). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748874 Title: plaintext domain gets HTML mail To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/748874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 22199]
confirmed. WORKSFORME, too, on Ubuntu with Gnome 2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22199 Title: Firefox steals Alt-Tab whilst in URL completion drop-down To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/22199/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748874]
*** Bug 698262 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748874 Title: plaintext domain gets HTML mail To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/748874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748874]
(and before string comparison, add a dot before both domains, to avoid matching @nopaypal.com when paypal.com is configured.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748874 Title: plaintext domain gets HTML mail To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/748874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748874]
(In reply to WADA from comment #8)
(C) If domainpart of mail address(string after @) is substring of
mailnews.plaintext_domains or mailnews.html_domains, mailnews looks to
consider that the domainpart is registered as plaintext_domain or
html_domain.
4913 PRInt32 atPos = recipient.mEmail.FindChar('@');
4914 if (atPos = 0)
4915 {
4916 domain = Substring(recipient.mEmail, atPos + 1);
4917 if (CaseInsensitiveFindInReadable(domain, plaintextDomains))
4918 recipient.mPreferFormat = nsIAbPreferMailFormat::plaintext;
4919 else
4920 if (CaseInsensitiveFindInReadable(domain, htmlDomains))
4921 recipient.mPreferFormat = nsIAbPreferMailFormat::html;
4922 }
Ben Bucksch, is my guess right?
Indeed, that's precisely the bug, nail on head. This comparison is just
wrong.
We need to split the string at ,, then compare the right-most part,
and only get a hit, if the email address domain string is equal or
longer than the pref domain string, not the other way around as now.
Ben
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748874
Title:
plaintext domain gets HTML mail
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/748874/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 465654] Re: Website: Download-Page gives no download URL
Confirming. Thanks for finally fixing this. As the bug reporter, I confirm that it's fixed. I now have a plain link (a href=) where I can do Copy Link Location, and paste the URL in a terminal for wget/curl, and thus download on a different machine or with a different download program. era, working without JavaScript would be nice, but implies a page reload. This is significantly slower. The current solution is very nice to those with JavaScript. It would be good to have such a fallback mode, in case JavaScript is known to be disabled. But that would be a different bug. The point here was that you're on the Ubuntu download page using a full desktop with Firefox and JavaScript, and want to download on a different machine. That is now possible and easy. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465654 Title: Website: Download-Page gives no download URL To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website-content/+bug/465654/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 66332]
wsmwk, bug 401014 has nothing to do with this bug here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66332 Title: HTML Preference does not apply itself to newsgroups -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 136252] Re: [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot hotplug fails)
Again I ran into this. System was an Ubuntu 8.10 with an 8-disk md array plus separate system disk. Given that 8.10 is not supported anymore, I needed to upgrade to 10.04. All I did was change sources.list to lucid and apt-get dist-upgrade, reboot, and I am left without my array. * mdadm.conf is the default, no ARRAY line * mdadm --auto-detect does nothing * mdadm --assemble /dem/md0 complains Worse, * Adding ARRAY /dev/md0 devices=/dev/sda,/dev/sdb,/dev/sdc,/dev/sdd,/dev/sde,/dev/sdf,/dev/sdg,/dev/sdh to mdadm.conf and doing mdadm --assemble /dem/md0 says that /dev/sdb has no superblock - which is freaky, given that it worked fine before the upgrade. So, this is still breaking systems, even when upgrading to the latest 10.04 LTS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136252 Title: [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot hotplug fails) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 465654] Re: Website: Download-Page gives no download URL
Not fixed. I see no change on the download page http://www.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu/download. Bug as described in initial description still exists. ** Changed in: ubuntu-website-content Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465654 Title: Website: Download-Page gives no download URL -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310999]
The relevant Mozilla bug to that incident is bug 642395. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310999 Title: comodo seen issuing certificates unwisely -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310999]
I stand by my comment 72. A CA must not be allowed to outsource central functions of the CA, including key signing, verification and server administration. All entities who can, technically or organizationally, perform these functions, must be included in the audits, being checked physically. We MUST include this in our policy docs. Sam, you don't even need to worry about government interference when *anybody* can get random certs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310999 Title: comodo seen issuing certificates unwisely -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 465654] Re: Website: Download-Page gives no download URL
** Changed in: ubuntu-website-content Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465654 Title: Website: Download-Page gives no download URL -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 465654] Re: Website: Download-Page gives no download URL
I don't know why this was changed from Confirmed to Invalid, but the bug still exists and is annoying. The page does not give a download link, it starts immediately, and even then doesn't give a download link. When installing a new VM on a server, I had to jump to hoops to get the URL to be able to wget on the server. Please fix this. This should have been fixed half a year ago, in fact. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465654 Title: Website: Download-Page gives no download URL -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490935]
*** Bug 532153 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- it is not possible to modify email subject https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412647] Re: Firefox is not able to play mp4 video tags
Also see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541286 (I can't find how to add a remote bug watch) ** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #541286 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541286 -- Firefox is not able to play mp4 video tags https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 465654] [NEW] Website: Download-Page gives no download URL
Public bug reported: Reproduction: 1. Go to http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download-server 2. Select a version and location. 3. Try to find the download URL, to download the ISO on another machine (the server) Actual result: No download URL anywhere to be found Only a big green button Begin download, which is a JavaScript, which directly starts the download in Firefox. But I don't want it here, it want the ISO on the server (which is a dedicated server which I ssh to over the Internet, so uploading the ISO is not feasible). Expected result: * As soon as I select version and location, a download link appears. * (Alternatively) The big green button is a proper link (a href=). Severity: High. Can't download (on server). Regression: This is a regression. The page was different 2 days ago, and it did - after automatically starting the download - show a download link with text if the download does not start automatically (which is nonsense in my case, but at least gave me what I need). ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Website: Download-Page gives no download URL https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 465654] Re: Website: Download-Page gives no download URL
Workaround, in Firefox: Allow it to download (including selecting a download location in your filesystem), open Download-Manager, Right- Click on entry, Copy Download Link. -- Website: Download-Page gives no download URL https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 25619] Re: eog doesn't ask whether to save changes
Please only save automatically, if it's lossless (only metadata changed). If the JPEG itself is altered when rotating (which would be lossy), saving automatically would be a several bug IMHO (this is an image *viewer*, and I don't expect it to alter my files, much less in a damaging way, just because I wanted to *view* them rotated). -- eog doesn't ask whether to save changes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376984] [NEW] md sw raid5 not detected on boot [jaunty regression]
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mdadm Reproduction: 1. # mdadm --create /dev/md0 -l 5 -n8 /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh 2. # cat /proc/mdstat 3. # reboot 4. # cat /proc/mdstat Actual result: In step 2: All is fine, md0 is shown as active (and syncing, and after a day, synced) md0 : active raid5 sdh[7] sdg[6] sdf[5] sde[4] sdd[3] sdc[2] sdb[1] sda[0] 3418705472 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [8/8] [] unused devices: none In step 4: It wrongly detect some md_d0 which I never created, on only sdd. md_d0 : inactive sdd[3](S) 488386496 blocks I have no idea how it comes to that md_d0, nor why it singles our sdd. Expected result: Step 4 matches step 2. Version: Works in 8.10 Intrepid. Appeared after do-dist-upgrade to 9.04 Jaunty. Array created in either 8.10 or 9.04 is detected correctly when I boot 8.10, but when I boot 9.04, I get the above problem. (I reinstalled an old backup of 8.10 in a different partition to try this out.) Cost: 5? hours Detailed information: Creation: # mdadm --stop /dev/md_d0 (clean up problem, to be able to re-try) # mdadm --create /dev/md0 -l 5 -n8 /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /d ev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh # echo 1000 /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max # pvcreate /dev/md0 Physical volume /dev/md0 successfully created # vgcreate array2 /dev/md0 Volume group array2 successfully created # lvcreate array2 --name backupall --size 2T Logical volume backupall created # lvdisplay --- Logical volume --- LV Name/dev/array2/backupall VG Namearray2 LV UUIDoWSHAO-cdFK-d7nw-yRzf-OytB-j1Z7-MprUOk LV Write Accessread/write LV Status available # open 0 LV Size2,00 TB Current LE 524288 Segments 1 Allocation inherit Read ahead sectors auto - currently set to 256 Block device 252:0 # mkfs.xfs /dev/array2/backupall -L backup-all # df -h ... /dev/mapper/array2-backupall 2,0T 4,2M 2,0T 1% /backupall # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md0 : active raid5 sdh[8] sdg[6] sdf[5] sde[4] sdd[3] sdc[2] sdb[1] sda[0] 3418705472 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [8/7] [UUU_] [] recovery = 60.6% (296171520/488386496) finish=501.0min speed=6392K/sec unused devices: none # mdadm --detail /dev/md0 /dev/md0: Version : 00.90 Creation Time : Thu May 14 06:06:31 2009 Raid Level : raid5 Array Size : 3418705472 (3260.33 GiB 3500.75 GB) Used Dev Size : 488386496 (465.76 GiB 500.11 GB) Raid Devices : 8 Total Devices : 8 Preferred Minor : 0 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Thu May 14 06:21:40 2009 State : clean, degraded, recovering Active Devices : 7 Working Devices : 8 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 1 ... # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md0 : active raid5 sdh[7] sdg[6] sdf[5] sde[4] sdd[3] sdc[2] sdb[1] sda[0] 3418705472 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [8/8] [] unused devices: none --- After reboot: # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md_d0 : inactive sdd[3](S) 488386496 blocks # mdadm -E /dev/sda /dev/sda: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 00.90.00 UUID : 13e3f335:5cec114d:49feb062:8f17c717 (local to host volte) Creation Time : Thu May 14 06:06:31 2009 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 488386496 (465.76 GiB 500.11 GB) Array Size : 3418705472 (3260.33 GiB 3500.75 GB) Raid Devices : 8 Total Devices : 8 Preferred Minor : 0 Update Time : Fri May 15 15:20:47 2009 State : clean Active Devices : 8 Working Devices : 8 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : a44802d3 - correct Events : 22 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 64K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 0 800 active sync /dev/sda 0 0 800 active sync /dev/sda 1 1 8 161 active sync /dev/sdb 2 2 8 322 active sync /dev/sdc 3 3 8 483 active sync /dev/sdd 4 4 8 644 active sync /dev/sde 5 5 8 805 active sync /dev/sdf 6 6 8 966 active sync /dev/sdg 7 7 8 1127 active sync /dev/sdh # mdadm -E /dev/sdd /dev/sdd: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 00.90.00 UUID : 13e3f335:5cec114d:49feb062:8f17c717 (local to host volte) Creation Time : Thu
[Bug 225348] Re: USB install guide should point to hd-media, not just netboot
If it's fairly common problems (I would count your MBR problem as that), I think they should get a FAQ section at the end. Is this intended for a new audience or people with experience? I think the audience should be all Ubuntu users. Using USB sticks instead of CD-ROMs will be very common for ordinary users. In fact, I personally think this document should be linked right from the download page, and should be fool-proof enough for that. -- USB install guide should point to hd-media, not just netboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225348] Re: USB install guide should point to hd-media, not just netboot
js84, thanks for the response. Can you make sure this is fixed in the 9.04 documentation at the time of 9.04 release, given that many people will try to install it at that time? The risk here is that people are led on wrong trails and have serious problems installing from USB stick - which probably is rather common these days. -- USB install guide should point to hd-media, not just netboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 248268] Re: Packages installed with apt-get build-dep should be set to auto-installed for easy removal
I was just about to file the behaviour that was added here as bug. I think Jeremy-list's suggestion on 2008-12-05 is very good and would suit both the needs of the original bug filer as well as ours, without the need for a pref. Here's the use-case: I am a developer. I want to install all packages needed to compile Foo, and I need to keep them. Manually installing them is too much hassle given the strange library package names in Debian, build-dep is really useful and an important criteria when choosing the distro. This (me wanting to keep the deps) is the common case. OTOH, I occasionally have to compile a package from source that I just want to use. Esp. in cases like mplayer, it's nice to be able to easily remove the build deps again. In this case, having them all set to manually installed and removing them manually is just as hassle-some as having to install them manually. (That's probably where the original complaint here comes from.) Thus, I think that tracking (for autoremove) the build-dep installs differently from the normal package installs, and allowing a remove-dep Foo (which only removes the build deps that are not needed by some other build-dep Bar that I also did), is the ideal. -- Packages installed with apt-get build-dep should be set to auto-installed for easy removal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248268 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 248268] Re: Packages installed with apt-get build-dep should be set to auto-installed for easy removal
Workaround: For packages where I want to keep the deps, do apt-get build-dep Foo, abort, copypaste the packages listed as NEW install into a apt-get install commandline. -- Packages installed with apt-get build-dep should be set to auto-installed for easy removal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248268 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158178] Re: Cannot install at_3.1.10ubuntu4_amd64.deb
I had the same problem when upgrading from 8.04 to 8.10 (via changing sources.list and apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade). The problem is diagnosed nicely on http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=366806 . Basically: /etc/init.d/atd start works, but invoke-rc.d atd start does not (as root:) # /etc/init.d/atd stop * Stopping deferred execution scheduler atd [ OK ] # /etc/init.d/atd start * Starting deferred execution scheduler atd # /etc/init.d/atd stop * Stopping deferred execution scheduler atd [ OK ] # invoke-rc.d atd start * Starting deferred execution scheduler atd invoke-rc.d: initscript atd, action start failed. I consider this critical, as it prevents a proper update of the distro. ** Changed in: at (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- Cannot install at_3.1.10ubuntu4_amd64.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220977] Re: Example for Preparing Files for USB Memory Stick Booting is dangerous
** Summary changed: - Wording for Preparing Files for USB Memory Stick Booting + Example for Preparing Files for USB Memory Stick Booting is dangerous ** Summary changed: - Example for Preparing Files for USB Memory Stick Booting is dangerous + Example command for Preparing Files for USB Memory Stick Booting is dangerous -- Example command for Preparing Files for USB Memory Stick Booting is dangerous https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220977 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158178] Re: Cannot install at_3.1.10ubuntu4_amd64.deb
Workaround: 1. Delete last line from /var/lib/dpkg/info/at.postinst 2. apt-get -f install -- Cannot install at_3.1.10ubuntu4_amd64.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158178] Re: Cannot install at_3.1.10ubuntu4_amd64.deb
Please note that the start comment does not give an [OK]. (This is not a paste error.) cron start does give an [OK]. Maybe that's why invoke- rc.d fails? -- Cannot install at_3.1.10ubuntu4_amd64.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275654] [NEW] Unparseable date
Public bug reported: import java.util.*; DateFormat dp = new SimpleDateFormat(MMddHHmmss z); Date start = dp.parse(20081001175000 CET); returns Unparseable date on OpenJDK 6 on Ubuntu 8.04.1 server, but works with Sub Java 6 on Gentoo. I suspect it doesn't understand the timezone CET and expects a numerical (+0100 or +0200, depending on summer / winter time)? ** Affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Unparseable date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275654] Re: Unparseable date
Works with sun-java6-jre: It works when I remove openjdk-6-jre-headless and use the Sun Java 6 in Ubuntu. So, this is clearly an openJDK problem. -- Unparseable date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225348] [NEW] USB install guide should point to hd-media, not just netboot
Public bug reported: https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/installation-guide/i386/boot-usb-files.html Actual result: The guide is not clear that I should use a different boot.img.gz for network-based install and ISO-based install, esp. when quickly skimming over it. Copying the files — the easy way There is an all-in-one file netboot/boot.img.gz (link) which contains a... This does not state that you *cannot* use that together with an ISO. This is not obvious either (I assumed there's only one installer, not two mutually exclusive versions). Adding an ISO image ... If you want to install over the network, without using an ISO image, you will of course skip the previous step. Moreover you will have to use the initial ramdisk from the netboot directory instead of the one from hd-media, because hd-media/initrd.gz does not have network support. This does not contain a link. Expected result: Given that there are two *different* boot.img.gz for ISO install and network install, and another way of copying files manually, I suggest that there are 3 sections in the tutorial: 1. USB boot image for networked install 2. USB boot image for local install with ISO image 3. Manually creating the USB stick using the ISO image The 1. and 2. section contain different different links to the hd- media/boot.img.gz and netboot/boot.img.gz images. Section 2 may refer to section 1, but only when making very clear to use a different image. ** Affects: installation-guide (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - USB install guide should point to hd-media, not netboot + USB install guide should point to hd-media, not just netboot -- USB install guide should point to hd-media, not just netboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225402] [NEW] Increase FAT size for hd-media/boot.img.gz
Public bug reported: https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/installation-guide/i386/boot-usb-files.html Actual result: The installer image for USB sticks, which can use a local ISO to install from - hd-media/boot.img.gz - has a fairly small FAT size of 256MB. This means if I put the image directly on an USB stick using zcat boot.img.gz /dev/sdb1 and mount the USB stick, I will not be able to copy the ISO on the stick. I have to have or create a new FAT file system on the stick and mount it, loop-mount the boot.img file, copy the contents to the stick, copy the ISO, umount it and run syslinux on the stick. Expected result: Please provide an image which has a default FAT size of 800MB-1GB, so that I can just write the image on the stick, mount it, copy an ISO onto it, and be done. If you want to keep providing the 256MB image (I don't think it's necessary, though), then please provide another image with 1 GB in addition to it. It's only ~16 MB (per arch). Importance: USB sticks are extremely common and cheap these says, and most mainboards can boot from them. They probably will be the a favorite install media. Not all machines have CD-ROM drives anymore. I also was very often in the situation of not having a blank CD available. ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged -- Increase FAT size for hd-media/boot.img.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225402 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
