[Bug 1872212] Re: grub-install: Operation not permitted
I have the same issue on bare metal (Ryzen 3600 on B550 MB) and --no- nvram also disables the error message by, presumably, *not* updating the EFI boot entries in NVRAM. This was a working install and efibootmgr looked reasonable after attempting to upgrade grub-efi-amd64-signed: [deneb:~]$ sudo efibootmgr BootCurrent: Timeout: 1 seconds BootOrder: ,0002 Boot* ubuntu Boot0002* Windows Boot Manager However, and I can't explain this, the boot entries are duplicated after rebooting (which, BTW, worked OK): [deneb:~]$ sudo efibootmgr BootCurrent: Timeout: 1 seconds BootOrder: ,0002,0003,0004 Boot* ubuntu Boot0002* Windows Boot Manager Boot0003* Windows Boot Manager Boot0004* ubuntu I would swear those duplicates weren't present even after running efibootmgr *after* doing the grub-efi-amd64-signed upgrade. I can't identify *when* they were installed unless somehow they were masked until after I rebooted. In any case it seems *wrong* to have duplicate entries for the *same* operating system. Perhaps this is a clue? Maybe the grub update is trying to install *new* entries when there are already entries present? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872212 Title: grub-install: Operation not permitted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1872212/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1872212] Re: grub-install: Operation not permitted
Me to. I upgraded all out-of-date packages and the grub-efi-amd64-signed upgrade failed as shown above. This was an *upgrade* on bare metal (A Ryzen 3600 on a B550 motherboard) that had been booting just fine prior to this error. The '--no-nvram' work-around prevents the error but I have no idea if UEFI has been configured correctly. FWIW, the efibootmgr program displays rational looking EFI entries: sudo efibootmgr BootCurrent: Timeout: 1 seconds BootOrder: ,0002 Boot* ubuntu Boot0002* Windows Boot Manager and the grub update does install new (or at least touch) the files in /boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu. I'm about to reboot this machine to see whether my home file server is borked or not :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872212 Title: grub-install: Operation not permitted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1872212/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1609326] Re: adminer .conf file is misplaced in /adminer/apache.conf
Folks can't figure out how to use adminer on 17.04 anymore: https://askubuntu.com/questions/915587/why-i-am-getting-empty-folder-of- adminer-after-install/920951#920951 @jbicha what did you end up doing? Did you just download manually or did you have some other workaround? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1609326 Title: adminer .conf file is misplaced in /adminer/apache.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adminer/+bug/1609326/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556602] Re: LVM in 16.04 cannot mount LVM Cached Volumes created in 15.10
LVM caching enabled in Ubuntu 16.04 (or, to be completely honest, Linux Mint 18) is also incompatible with the older caching implementation in Linux Mint Debian Edition 2 (i.e. Debian Jessie). I hoped the following procedure would create an LVM cache that works for both Jessie and Xenial: 1) Under Jessie, remove the cache from the LVM volume. 2) Reboot into Xenial and add an LVM cache to the volume. (This works fine). 3) Reboot back to Jessie to use the LVM volume with caching created under Xenial. My goal is to support dual boot between jessie and xenial with LVM caching enabled on my data volumes. This doesn't work. The LVM volume comes up a disabled or offline under Jessie and there's no apparent way to bring it up without removing the cache. (I can easily recreate this on my scratch/test machine in case there's useful data to be gathered). So, LVM caching between debian jessie and ubuntu xenial is neither forward or backwards compatible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556602 Title: LVM in 16.04 cannot mount LVM Cached Volumes created in 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/1556602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556602] Re: LVM cannot mount LVM Cached Volumes from LMDE Betsy
Installing the thin-provisioning-tools after booting the Live USB did not help. I still get the same error when checking the LVM partition status with 'pvs'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556602 Title: LVM cannot mount LVM Cached Volumes from LMDE Betsy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/1556602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556602] Re: LVM cannot mount LVM Cached Volumes from LMDE Betsy
Here is the package info for LVM2 on LDME Betsy: dpkg-query -l lvm2 Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-==---= ii lvm2 2.02.111-2.2 amd64Linux Logical Volume Manager aptitude show lvm2 Package: lvm2 State: installed Automatically installed: no Multi-Arch: foreign Version: 2.02.111-2.2 Priority: optional Section: admin Maintainer: Debian LVM TeamArchitecture: amd64 Uncompressed Size: 1,663 k Depends: libc6 (>= 2.15), libdevmapper-event1.02.1 (>= 2:1.02.74), libdevmapper1.02.1 (>= 2:1.02.90), libreadline5 (>= 5.2), libudev1 (>= 183), init-system-helpers (>= 1.18~), lsb-base, dmsetup (> 2:1.02.47), dmeventd (> 2:1.02.90), initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-13.3) Suggests: thin-provisioning-tools Conflicts: lvm2 Breaks: initramfs-tools (< 0.99), initramfs-tools (< 0.99), thin-provisioning-tools (< 0.3.2), thin-provisioning-tools (< 0.3.2) Provides: lvm2 Provided by: lvm2 Description: Linux Logical Volume Manager This is LVM2, the rewrite of The Linux Logical Volume Manager. LVM supports enterprise level volume management of disk and disk subsystems by grouping arbitrary disks into volume groups. The total capacity of volume groups can be allocated to logical volumes, which are accessed as regular block devices. Homepage: http://sources.redhat.com/lvm2/ Tags: admin::filesystem, interface::commandline, role::program, scope::utility, uitoolkit::ncurses Hmmm... I wonder whether thin-provisioning-tools was missing on the Ubuntu Xenial install ISO. Here's that package: aptitude show thin-provisioning-tools Package: thin-provisioning-tools State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 0.3.2-1 Priority: optional Section: admin Maintainer: Debian LVM Team Architecture: amd64 Uncompressed Size: 17.1 M Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14), libexpat1 (>= 2.0.1), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libstdc++6 (>= 4.6) Conflicts: thin-provisioning-tools Description: Tools for handling thinly provisioned device-mapper meta-data This package contains tools to handle meta-data from the device-mapper thin target. This target allows the use of a single backing store for multple thinly provisioned volumes. Numerous snapshots can be taken from such volumes. The tools can check the meta-data for consistency, repair damaged information and dump or restore the meta-data in textual form. I vaguely recall having to manually install that when I set up these LVM cache's. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556602 Title: LVM cannot mount LVM Cached Volumes from LMDE Betsy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/1556602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556602] [NEW] LVM cannot mount LVM Cached Volumes from LMDE Betsy
Public bug reported: I'm test driving Ubuntu Mate Beta 1 (from USB) on a machine that uses LVM caching. (I use some SSD to cache old hard drives). My LVM setup was created with Linux Mint Debian Edition - Betsy release. The system cannot mount these cached volumes due to the following error reported by 'pvs': ubuntu-mate@ubuntu-mate:~$ sudo pvs LV CacheArchive has invalid cache's feature flag. LV CacheArchive is missing cache policy name. Internal error: LV segments corrupted in CacheArchive. LV CacheArchive has invalid cache's feature flag. LV CacheArchive is missing cache policy name. Internal error: LV segments corrupted in CacheArchive. PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/sda5 vga lvm2 a-- 80.00g 70.00g /dev/sda6 vga lvm2 a-- 160.00g 50.00g /dev/sdb1 vga lvm2 a-- 200.00g 50.00g I did a bit of googling and found a similar report for upgrades from Fedora 21 to Fedora 23. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282188. I'll annotate this bug with the LVM version from my existing Debian based configuration in a few minutes. This is a show-stopper for me because I use LVM caching on both of my PCs. It's a great way to marry a 256 GB SSD with a 2 TB hard drive. I keep the OS and some key partitions on the SSD and then use the rest of the SSD to cache the hard drive. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: lvm2 2.02.133-1ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-7.22-generic 4.4.2 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-7-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.367 CurrentDesktop: MATE Date: Sun Mar 13 12:48:41 2016 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-MATE 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160224) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: lvm2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556602 Title: LVM cannot mount LVM Cached Volumes from LMDE Betsy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/1556602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1006776] Re: openjdk-6-jdk ssl negotiation incompatibility
I get this error using a self-signed cert for localhost, but not when using a self-signed cert for another domain and setting my hosts file to point that domain to localhost -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006776 Title: openjdk-6-jdk ssl negotiation incompatibility To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1006776/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1023055] Re: do-release-upgrade crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/ubuntu-release-upgrader/check-new-release: No module named DistUpgrade.DistUpgradeVersion
That link https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source...+build/3652904 should be https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/3.2.3-3ubuntu1/+build/3652904 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023055 Title: do-release-upgrade crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/ubuntu- release-upgrader/check-new-release: No module named DistUpgrade.DistUpgradeVersion To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1023055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Re: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
BTW, I had to add the 'mdadm -Ss --wait-clean' command to a KDE shutdown script (instead of one of the normal system shutdown scripts under /etc/init.d) because the shutdown scripts would not wait for this command to complete. It takes long enough to '--wait-clean' that something during shutdown would *kill* the mdadm command waiting for the RAID to stop. That left the RAID in an unclean state hence forcing a resync on the next reboot. The KDE shutdown script doesn't have a timeout so it would let the mdadm command run to completion. Note that I do *not* keep my system on the RAID. Kubuntu and the Windows C: drive are both on an SSD. The RAID array (of two 1 TB drives) is used for /home and other user data file systems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Re: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Re: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
I found and fixed this problem and it has nothing to do with the kernel. Intel RAID is *extremely* finicky and I remembered that it required two tweaks to the initrd build process. I originally implemented those tweaks in a couple of the MDADM 'hook' files under /usr/share. That was my mistake. These MDADM hooks were overwritten sometime between the installation of 3.2.0-49 and 3.2.0-51 on my PC. (I assume there was an update to the mdadm package). Without my tweaks in initrd.img-3.2.0-51-generic, the RAID won't start and, once that's fixed, the RAID only starts in read-only mode. I dug through the '/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs' script to see if there's a better way to customize the construction of initrd and found that my changes should have been implemented under /etc/udev/rules.d and /etc /initramfs-tools/hooks. I've made those changes, re-ran update- initramfs, and now 3.2.0-51 is working fine. So, my bad. Thanks to the Ubuntu team for your help looking at this from the perspective that it was a kernel regression. P.S. I need to find a blog someplace to document all this. Intel RAID can work, but it takes lots of customization. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Re: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
The files that have to be customized or overridden by adding hooks under /etc are: /lib/udev/rules.d/64-md-raid.rules /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/mdadm so I think this is more of an MDADM issue instead of a generic setup/config issue. But, that depends on which package actually owns these files. (I didn't track that down). That said, the 64-md-raid.rules file was changed by someone to fix Ubuntu bug 1030292 to sort out some other issue and I found that I had to partially *revert* that change to make Intel RAID work for me. So, if we make Intel RAID work for me, then something else may break. Which is preferable? I'll try to get on help.ubuntu.com to write this up. BTW, one of the nastiest issues with Intel RAID isn't getting it started. Its getting it stopped correctly during a shut down. That was a major PITA and I eventually had to hack the KDE (!!) shutdown scripts to umount the file systems I have on RAID when I log out. So, I mount RAID during KDM startup and unmount during KDM shutdown. I couldn't find any other way issue the magic 'mdadm -Ss --wait-clean' command required to cleanly stop the array so it wouldn't re-sync (re- mirror) itself on the next reboot. This is such a total hack that I wouldn't accept it into production code. But, if there's a better way to force a command to be executed during a shutdown and umount then I'd be happy to help trouble-shoot it. I couldn't find a better method and I tried a number of different approaches to changing the scripts under /etc to do this more cleanly than hacking KDE startup and shutdown. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Re: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
I can't test 3.2.46 because there are no amd64 packages available in http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.2.46-precise. (There were no Intel CPU packages at all). I did test 3.2.47 and 3.2.48 images and *both* of them fail to detect my Intel fakeraid array. I also looked into updating my BIOS, as suggested by penalvch, and I've decided *not* to upgrade. Too many horror stories about broken systems after doing the upgrade including really basic stuff like detecting Nvidia video cards, overclock failures, higher CPU temps, etc. I'm also concerned that a BIOS upgrade will wipe the Intel raid state from the BIOS and hence force me to rebuild the array from scratch. I'd rather not do that either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Re: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
The bug exists in the latest upstream kernel (v3.11-rc4-saucy). I see identical behavior to the originally reported bug. MD fails to see my intel fakeraid array but both physical members of the array are online and readable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Re: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
I'm reluctant to upgrade the BIOS on a PC that is otherwise working fine but I agree that my BIOS is quite out of date. So, I'll probably upgrade tomorrow. (Have to go to work now). That said, I'm skeptical upgrading the BIOS would matter because Linux 3.2.0-49 works fine and 3.2.0-51 doesn't. Something changed in that kernel update that broke intel fakeraid. One kernel works, one doesn't, and the BIOS is the same for both. If I was never able to get fake raid working then your suggestion would make more sense to me but it was working *well* until 3.2.0-51 was released. I have one big RAID 1 volume partitioned into multiple file systems that works with both windows and Linux 3.2.0-49. Linux can even see and access the windows NTFS partition that's on the fakeraid volume. Can you point me to a patch or patches that upgrade 3.2.0-49 to 3.2.0-51? I'm moderately familar with the kernel, and the Intel platform, so I may see a patch that is suspicious. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Re: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
Tested upstream kernel as requested. Regression exists upstream too. Added kernel-bug-exists-upstream tag. ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] [NEW] Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
Public bug reported: I have been using Intel FakeRAID on an Asus Z77 motherboard on Kubuntu 12.04 for months. I'm using the MDADM version and not DMRAID. It has been working fine other than a couple minor issues with clean shutdowns that I fixed by tweaking a couple of the scripts under /etc. I upgraded to the latest Linux kernel (3.2.0-51) and my FakeRAID stopped working, probably because auto-detection failed to see the RAID array. Everything works fine with the previous kernel image, 3.2.0-49. Here is /proc/mdstat with the 3.2.0-49 generic kernel image: Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md126 : active raid1 sdb[1] sdc[0] 976758784 blocks super external:/md127/0 [2/2] [UU] md127 : inactive sdb[1](S) sdc[0](S) 6306 blocks super external:imsm The /proc/mdstat file is empty (other than listing personalities) in 3.2.0-51. Note that the sdb and sdc drives are recognized by 3.2.0-51, and their partition tables look reasonable, so I don't see any issues with 3.2.0-51 actually seeing the physical drives. The problem appears to be that the MD driver doesn't detect the external RAID (aka 'imsm') metadata created by Intel fakeraid. Here's the additional data requested for new bug reports: lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Release:12.04 apt-cache policy linux-image-3.2.0-51-generic linux-image-3.2.0-51-generic: Installed: 3.2.0-51.77 Candidate: 3.2.0-51.77 Version table: *** 3.2.0-51.77 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status FWIW, here's the apt-cache data on the previous kernel where fakeraid worked correctly: apt-cache policy linux-image-3.2.0-49-generic linux-image-3.2.0-49-generic: Installed: 3.2.0-49.75 Candidate: 3.2.0-49.75 Version table: *** 3.2.0-49.75 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I will attach the kernel.log for booting 3.2.0-49 and 3.2.0-51. I've looked at them and all I see is that 3.2.0-49 'binds' the RAID array components and 3.2.0-51 doesn't. Here's a snippet from 3.2.0-49 where it starts my RAID. This is absent in 3.2.0-51. Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.088509] md: bindsdb Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.150987] md: bindsdc Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.151022] md: bindsdb Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.151746] md: raid1 personality registered for level 1 Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.152167] bio: create slab bio-1 at 1 Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.152239] md/raid1:md126: active with 2 out of 2 mirrors Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.152249] md126: detected capacity change from 0 to 1000200994816 Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.153111] md126: p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 p7 Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot and/or fix this? There's no point bisecting the kernel images given the regression has just appeared in 3.2.0-51 and, AFAIK, there was never a release of a '3.2.0-50' kernel. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Incomplete ** Tags: needs-kernel-logs needs-upstream-testing regression-release ** Attachment added: Kernel.log from 3.2.0-49 (that works) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764808/+files/3.2.0-49.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Re: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
3.2.0-51 kernel log ** Attachment added: Kernel log from 3.2.0-51 (that fails to start FakeRAID) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+attachment/3764809/+files/3.2.0-51.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] AplayDevices.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764824/+files/AplayDevices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Re: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected precise staging ** Description changed: I have been using Intel FakeRAID on an Asus Z77 motherboard on Kubuntu 12.04 for months. I'm using the MDADM version and not DMRAID. It has been working fine other than a couple minor issues with clean shutdowns that I fixed by tweaking a couple of the scripts under /etc. I upgraded to the latest Linux kernel (3.2.0-51) and my FakeRAID stopped working, probably because auto-detection failed to see the RAID array. Everything works fine with the previous kernel image, 3.2.0-49. Here is /proc/mdstat with the 3.2.0-49 generic kernel image: Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md126 : active raid1 sdb[1] sdc[0] 976758784 blocks super external:/md127/0 [2/2] [UU] md127 : inactive sdb[1](S) sdc[0](S) 6306 blocks super external:imsm The /proc/mdstat file is empty (other than listing personalities) in 3.2.0-51. Note that the sdb and sdc drives are recognized by 3.2.0-51, and their partition tables look reasonable, so I don't see any issues with 3.2.0-51 actually seeing the physical drives. The problem appears to be that the MD driver doesn't detect the external RAID (aka 'imsm') metadata created by Intel fakeraid. Here's the additional data requested for new bug reports: lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Release:12.04 apt-cache policy linux-image-3.2.0-51-generic linux-image-3.2.0-51-generic: Installed: 3.2.0-51.77 Candidate: 3.2.0-51.77 Version table: *** 3.2.0-51.77 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status FWIW, here's the apt-cache data on the previous kernel where fakeraid worked correctly: apt-cache policy linux-image-3.2.0-49-generic linux-image-3.2.0-49-generic: Installed: 3.2.0-49.75 Candidate: 3.2.0-49.75 Version table: *** 3.2.0-49.75 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I will attach the kernel.log for booting 3.2.0-49 and 3.2.0-51. I've looked at them and all I see is that 3.2.0-49 'binds' the RAID array components and 3.2.0-51 doesn't. Here's a snippet from 3.2.0-49 where it starts my RAID. This is absent in 3.2.0-51. Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.088509] md: bindsdb Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.150987] md: bindsdc Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.151022] md: bindsdb Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.151746] md: raid1 personality registered for level 1 Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.152167] bio: create slab bio-1 at 1 Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.152239] md/raid1:md126: active with 2 out of 2 mirrors Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.152249] md126: detected capacity change from 0 to 1000200994816 Aug 6 06:53:46 canopus kernel: [2.153111] md126: p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 p7 - Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot and/or fix this? There's no point - bisecting the kernel images given the regression has just appeared in - 3.2.0-51 and, AFAIK, there was never a release of a '3.2.0-50' kernel. + Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot and/or fix this? There's no point bisecting the kernel images given the regression has just appeared in 3.2.0-51 and, AFAIK, there was never a release of a '3.2.0-50' kernel. + --- + AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. + ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.3 + Architecture: amd64 + AudioDevicesInUse: + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/controlC1: bmccann2893 F pulseaudio + /dev/snd/controlC0: bmccann2893 F pulseaudio + CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + Card0.Amixer.info: + Card hw:0 'PCH'/'HDA Intel PCH at 0xf743 irq 51' +Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC892' +Components : 'HDA:10ec0892,104384fb,00100302' +Controls : 44 +Simple ctrls : 21 + Card1.Amixer.info: + Card hw:1 'NVidia'/'HDA NVidia at 0xf708 irq 17' +Mixer name : 'Nvidia GPU 41 HDMI/DP' +Components : 'HDA:10de0041,14622871,00100100' +Controls : 24 +Simple ctrls : 4 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 + HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=ce0ec46d-5a8e-4ba4-9049-ed08a896696b + InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120424) + MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name + MarkForUpload: True + NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia + Package: linux (not installed) + ProcEnviron: + LANGUAGE= + TERM=xterm + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/tcsh + ProcFB: 0 VESA VGA + ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.2.0-49-generic root=UUID=90c7fb84-e571-4f25-b91a-0a8e9915763f ro quiet splash nomodeset vt.handoff=7 +
[Bug 1210104] AlsaDevices.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764823/+files/AlsaDevices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] BootDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764826/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] ArecordDevices.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764825/+files/ArecordDevices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Card0.Amixer.values.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764827/+files/Card0.Amixer.values.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Card1.Codecs.codec.0.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Card1.Codecs.codec.0.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764830/+files/Card1.Codecs.codec.0.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764828/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] CurrentDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764831/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Card1.Amixer.values.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Card1.Amixer.values.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764829/+files/Card1.Amixer.values.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764836/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764837/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Lspci.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764833/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764840/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] PulseList.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: PulseList.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764839/+files/PulseList.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] PciMultimedia.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764835/+files/PciMultimedia.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Lsusb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764834/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] IwConfig.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: IwConfig.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764832/+files/IwConfig.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764838/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764841/+files/UdevLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] UserAsoundrcAsoundconf.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UserAsoundrcAsoundconf.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104/+attachment/3764842/+files/UserAsoundrcAsoundconf.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1210104] Re: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51
OK. I added the apport data. Note that I am currently running 3.2.0-49, which works, because my machine is almost useless with 3.2.0-51. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210104 Title: Intel FakeRAID *Regression* in Kubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.2.0-51 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1210104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593332] Re: GT218 (GF 210) unsupported
Here's the GTX 650 Ti: $ sudo nvclock -f -i -- General info -- Card: Unknown Nvidia card Architecture: GE6 A1 PCI id: 0xbad0 GPU clock: -2147483.750 MHz Bustype:PCI -- Memory info -- Amount: 2989 MB Type: 128 bit SDR Clock: -2147483.750 MHz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593332 Title: GT218 (GF 210) unsupported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvclock/+bug/593332/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 965371] Re: HTTPS requests fail on sites which immediately close the connection if TLS 1.1 negotiation is attempted, on Ubuntu 12.04
This is happening when connecting to SoftLayer as well. I've filed a bug with them here: https://github.com/softlayer/softlayer-object-storage- python/issues/17 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965371 Title: HTTPS requests fail on sites which immediately close the connection if TLS 1.1 negotiation is attempted, on Ubuntu 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssl/+bug/965371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 771788] Re: nVidia driver activated and apparently being used but reported as not being used by jockey-gtk
I tried to install the driver from NVidia's site as Emilio suggested, but found it would not work. The 256.53 driver available on their site is incompatible with 2.6.38 kernel used by Natty. I get the message error: unknown field ‘ioctl’ specified in initializer and then nvidia.ko failed to build when compiling. It might be possible to downgrade the kernel to get it to work, but I don't particularly want to do that. /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p now says Not software rendered: no but it said yes before I started messing around with stuff. Any idea how I can get it changed back to yes? This bug really needs to get fixed. Can we change the importance to high? The bugs with high importance affect far, far fewer people than this bug, so I think the prioritization is out of whack. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771788 Title: nVidia driver activated and apparently being used but reported as not being used by jockey-gtk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/jockey/+bug/771788/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668382] Re: No warning before removing important packages!!
I removed evolution-data-server and evolution-data-server-common because I use gmail, so I didn't want any email software on my system. However, that removed gnome-panel with no notice whatsoever. I would like to suggest that we show what packages are being removed regardless of whether it's considered 'important'. A list of 'important' software could always be incomplete. If it's going to be removed I'd like to know about it under any circumstance. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668382 Title: No warning before removing important packages!! -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569224] Re: Plugin installation - keystore issue, reports: This trust engine is read only.
The problem for me was that I installed Eclipse Integrated Development Environment in synaptic. When I installed eclipse the problem was solved. This is insanely non-intuitive. Why are there two packages? Can we make Eclipse Integrated Development Environment install eclipse? ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Plugin installation - keystore issue, reports: This trust engine is read only. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569224 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607340] Re: Keyboard broken in NX
It seems this is the worst when using a shadow session. I cannot figure out how to resolve the problem in that case. However, I have somehow worked around the problem for the standard case. -- Keyboard broken in NX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607340 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 289918] Re: Regression: Connecting to FreeNX breaks keyboard layout in Intrepid
This is broken for me and none of the workarounds have helped. My client and server machines are both running Lucid. I am running the official NX client and server so the bug is not in freenx. I'd be nice if we could get the importance bumped up from low and hopefully get the bug assigned to someone. As a result of this bug, I am completely unable to work on my machine since replacing my openSUSE install with Ubuntu. Anyone have any other ideas for workarounds or debugging info I can provide? ** Changed in: freenx-server Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- Regression: Connecting to FreeNX breaks keyboard layout in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 289918] Re: Regression: Connecting to FreeNX breaks keyboard layout in Intrepid
** Changed in: freenx-server Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- Regression: Connecting to FreeNX breaks keyboard layout in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 289918] Re: Regression: Connecting to FreeNX breaks keyboard layout in Intrepid
** Changed in: metacity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Regression: Connecting to FreeNX breaks keyboard layout in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607340] Re: Keyboard broken in NX
This may well be a different bug than the Intrepid/FreeNX bug, but I would be surprised if the bug is in NX. I have not had this problem on any OS except Ubuntu. Also, when searching for a solution, I came across numerous posts regarding the up key being remapped to PrintScreen in Ubuntu. -- Keyboard broken in NX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607340 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 289918] Re: Regression: Connecting to FreeNX breaks keyboard layout in Intrepid
Sure. What do you mean by check the gnome-settings-daemon? What am I supposed to do exactly? -- Regression: Connecting to FreeNX breaks keyboard layout in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607340] [NEW] Keyboard broken in NX
Public bug reported: The keyboard is totally messed up when I NX into my Lucid desktop from my Lucid laptop. When I hit the up arrow it takes a screenshot. Instructions for installing NX available here: http://www.benmccann.com /dev-blog/my-first-experience-with-ubuntu/ ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Keyboard broken in NX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607340 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607072] [NEW] NX Shadowing requires disabling Compiz
Public bug reported: Looks a bit like a https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/353126 It looks like that bug is marked as fixed, which is why I'm reporting a new bug. I'm having a really hard time understanding what the status of that bug is since it appears to affect multiple packages. Apologies if this is a duplicate. I installed Lucid Lynx today and made sure the system is fully up-to- date. NX shadowing is broken on it though unless Compiz is disabled. I added the steps necessary to setup NX shadowing to help reproduce: http://www.benmccann.com/dev-blog/my-first-experience-with-ubuntu/ ** Affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- NX Shadowing requires disabling Compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 602152] [NEW] Ubuntu Software Center fails and swallows error message
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center I ran the following command as suggested on http://www.playonlinux.com/en/download.html: sudo wget http://deb.playonlinux.com/playonlinux_lucid.list -O /etc/apt/sources.list.d/playonlinux.list This created a file which was not readable: $ ls -l /etc/apt/sources.list.d/playonlinux.list -rw-r- 1 root root 43 May 1 09:42 playonlinux.list As a result the Ubuntu Software Center was entirely broken and it told me I had 0 packages installed. It should be able to deal with this or give me a reasonable error message. This caused me needless amounts of frustration. When I finally launched synpatic from the command line it was clear what was going on: E: Opening /etc/apt/sources.list.d/playonlinux.list - ifstream::ifstream (13: Permission denied) E: The list of sources could not be read. Go to the repository dialog to correct the problem. E: _cache-open() failed, please report. ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Ubuntu Software Center fails and swallows error message https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389117] Re: gedit - not standard redo keybinding
I have to say this does piss me off to no end. I spend the majority of my day in apps that use Ctrl+y for redo (e.g. Firefox, Chrome, Eclipse, etc.), so when I use gedit I always forget that it has a completely different key binding. Perhaps it could support both? That way it satisfies anyone who is used to one or the other. -- gedit - not standard redo keybinding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389117 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522950] Re: new flashplugin-installer broke flash in Ubuntu 9.04
I have the same issue with Google Chrome on 9.10. Here is the installation log: Log started: 2010-02-16 04:50:30 (Reading database ... 191850 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace flashplugin-installer 10.0.42.34ubuntu0.9.10.1 (using .../flashplugin-installer_10.0.45.2ubuntu0.9.10.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement flashplugin-installer ... Preparing to replace flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.42.34ubuntu0.9.10.1 (using .../flashplugin-nonfree_10.0.45.2ubuntu0.9.10.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement flashplugin-nonfree ... Setting up flashplugin-installer (10.0.45.2ubuntu0.9.10.1) ... Downloading... --2010-02-16 04:50:58-- http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_10.0.45.2.orig.tar.gz Resolving archive.canonical.com... 91.189.90.142 Connecting to archive.canonical.com|91.189.90.142|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 4028753 (3.8M) [application/x-gzip] Saving to: `./adobe-flashplugin_10.0.45.2.orig.tar.gz' 0K .. .. .. .. .. 1% 129K 30s 50K .. .. .. .. .. 2% 494K 19s 100K .. .. .. .. .. 3% 547K 15s 150K .. .. .. .. .. 5% 640K 12s 200K .. .. .. .. .. 6% 211K 13s 250K .. .. .. .. .. 7% 160K 15s 300K .. .. .. .. .. 8% 430K 14s 350K .. .. .. .. .. 10% 301M 12s 400K .. .. .. .. .. 11% 170K 13s 450K .. .. .. .. .. 12% 294K 12s 500K .. .. .. .. .. 13% 1005K 11s 550K .. .. .. .. .. 15% 461K 11s 600K .. .. .. .. .. 16% 860K 10s 650K .. .. .. .. .. 17% 638K 10s 700K .. .. .. .. .. 19% 429K 9s 750K .. .. .. .. .. 20% 928K 9s 800K .. .. .. .. .. 21% 810K 8s 850K .. .. .. .. .. 22% 277K 8s 900K .. .. .. .. .. 24% 356M 8s 950K .. .. .. .. .. 25% 243K 8s 1000K .. .. .. .. .. 26% 795K 8s 1050K .. .. .. .. .. 27% 252K 8s 1100K .. .. .. .. .. 29% 182K 8s 1150K .. .. .. .. .. 30% 185K 8s 1200K .. .. .. .. .. 31% 188K 8s 1250K .. .. .. .. .. 33% 213K 8s 1300K .. .. .. .. .. 34% 213K 8s 1350K .. .. .. .. .. 35% 251K 8s 1400K .. .. .. .. .. 36% 221K 8s 1450K .. .. .. .. .. 38% 267K 8s 1500K .. .. .. .. .. 39% 308K 8s 1550K .. .. .. .. .. 40% 328K 8s 1600K .. .. .. .. .. 41% 298K 7s 1650K .. .. .. .. .. 43% 328K 7s 1700K .. .. .. .. .. 44% 325K 7s 1750K .. .. .. .. .. 45% 227K 7s 1800K .. .. .. .. .. 47% 355K 7s 1850K .. .. .. .. .. 48% 328K 7s 1900K .. .. .. .. .. 49% 391K 6s 1950K .. .. .. .. .. 50% 370K 6s 2000K .. .. .. .. .. 52% 449K 6s 2050K .. .. .. .. .. 53% 394K 6s 2100K .. .. .. .. .. 54% 429K 6s 2150K .. .. .. .. .. 55% 333K 5s 2200K .. .. .. .. .. 57% 307K 5s 2250K .. .. .. .. .. 58% 287K 5s 2300K .. .. .. .. .. 59% 385K 5s 2350K .. .. .. .. .. 61% 486K 5s 2400K .. .. .. .. .. 62% 260K 5s 2450K .. .. .. .. .. 63% 876K 4s 2500K .. .. .. .. .. 64% 278K 4s 2550K .. .. .. .. .. 66% 277K 4s
[Bug 522950] Re: new flashplugin-installer broke flash in Ubuntu 9.04
I got flash working again on by 64-bit linux by: 1) Completely uninstall the flashplugin-installer and flashplugin- nonfree packages. 2) Downloading the 'beta' version of 64-bit Flash for Linux directly from http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_64bit.html. 3) Untar the tarball available via that page intp your ~/.mozilla/plugins directory. All it contains is libflashplayer.so. This got flash working again for me but I'm the only user on my Linux system. If you have a shared system then the library would have to be installed someplace under /usr or /lib so multiple users could load it. But, I don't know where. -- new flashplugin-installer broke flash in Ubuntu 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522950 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376259] Re: Some Broadcom chips unsupported by B43 wireless driver [BCM4322]
My HP-2140 uses the STA driver (which provides the 'wl' kernel module) under Jaunty 9.04 and that works fine. However, I am *not* running the stock 9.04 kernel due to problems with the Intel graphics driver in 9.04. To be more specific: * I think Intrepid (8.10) worked out of the box with the 2140 but I'm not positive. Its been a year since I installed that. * I upgraded to Jaunty (9.04) and that was miserable using its stock kernel due to the Intel graphics driver. I upgraded that kernel to the linux-image-2.6.30-02063005-generic kernel on the Ubuntu site to get a working (but slow) video driver. * Then I downloaded version 5.10.91.9 of the BCM STA driver from Broadcom. This required two patches to upgrade the driver to support 2.6.30, one of which included another bug fix. I think that bug crashed the kernel which I'm not seeing running on Karmic. But, with these patches (which basically tweak the driver for internal kernel API changes from 2.6.28 to 2.6.30), the STA driver is working OK. I still have the patch files if they would be any use. (They're probably not relevant to this B43 bug). -- Some Broadcom chips unsupported by B43 wireless driver [BCM4322] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376259 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376259] Re: Some Broadcom chips unsupported by B43 wireless driver [BCM4322]
The B43 driver is still broken on the HP-2140 with the BCM-4322 running on Karmic Alpha 6. Same dmesg data: [ 70.975437] b43-phy0: Broadcom 4322 WLAN found (core revision 16) [ 71.021089] b43-phy0 ERROR: FOUND UNSUPPORTED PHY (Analog 8, Type 4, Revision 4) [ 71.045828] b43: probe of ssb0:0 failed with error -95 Here's the lspci... 08:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4322 802.11a/b/g/n Wireless LAN Controller (rev 01) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 137f Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16 Memory at e800 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: b43-pci-bridge Kernel modules: ssb I tried this because the STA driver doesn't work on this chipset either in Karmic either. (I guess that's the topic for another bug). Wireless works fine in Jaunty. -- Some Broadcom chips unsupported by B43 wireless driver [BCM4322] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376259 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297263] Re: HP/Compaq mini Sky2 Ethernet not working if booting from battery
I am also seeing this bug on Karmic alpha-6 running on an HP 2140 mininote. If I boot from battery then the sky2 driver reports PCI configuration read error and fails to install. (I.e. no 'eth0' device). If I boot while plugged in then eth0 comes up successfully. However, the 'acpi_os_name=Linux' work-around isn't working. For reasons, possibly unrelated to this specific bug, when I boot from battery the Marvell chip is not detected and is missing from 'lspci'. I also saw the missing device problem before using 'acpi_os_name' so I don't think that's the culprit. -- HP/Compaq mini Sky2 Ethernet not working if booting from battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322867] Re: Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook
Stefan, I've solved my problem by upgrading to 2.6.30. If you're curious, then read on to find out how... I tried 'pause_on_oops' but it didn't help. It looks like both 'cores' of the hyper-threaded Atom CPU are both panic'ing at roughly the same time. There was no way to prevent crap scrolling off the top of the screen. I then tried a couple of experiments: 1) The kernel boots fine, with full ACPI support, with maxcpus=1. So, it appears to be SMP related. 2) I booted w/o maxcpus=1, but with acpi=ht to only enable sufficient ACPI support to detect the hyper-threaded processor. That crashes with the same stack trace I posted in comment #64. I searched launchpad a bit and found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267254. The work-around suggested there was to run 2.6.30. I installed the linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 package from Debian Sid, rebooted, and everything's fine. ACPI is working *and* both hyperthreads are working. I still had to fight with wireless by installing broadcom-sta- modules-2.6.30-1-686 (also from Sid) but as of now everything is working fine with Jaunty on my HP 2140 mininote. -- Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322867] Re: Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook
Hi Stefan, Thanks for your quick response. I used a 60 line VGA display w/o the splash screen but I can't say for sure where the kernel goes off the rails. It looks like there's a double panic and the second scrolls the first crash off the screen. I do see a series of message with 'ACPI' in them but I can't tell for sure what else was going on when the first crash happened. I'm attaching a jpeg of the screen. -Ben McCann ** Attachment added: Screen scrape of Jaunty panic during boot on HP-2140 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30717716/P1000999.JPG -- Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322867] Re: Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook
I think I have the same issue with the latest kernel on Jaunty 9.04 running on an HP 2140 Netbook (atom, 1GB, 120GB, etc). The kernel print's Starting up... and then panics with a stack trace similar to the one in comment #8. I can reliably work-around it using acpi=off but then I loose hyper-threading and acpi power management. Stefan, will you be promoting this fix in Jaunty? What's odd is that the latest kernel in 8.10 (intrepid) works fine. I've never had this problem on this laptop. (Of course, the timing could be just enough different to avoid the race). Thanks, Ben McCann -- Kernel panic after update to 2.6.24-23 on Acer Aspire One netbook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
Damian, I'm very surprised that selecting the VESA X11 driver breaks your X windows. This is the lowest common denominator driver that doesn't rely on any hardware specific acceleration features. It should *always* work. I'm attaching my xorg.conf file for your reference. This will be my last message on this bug because I'm putting my 2133 up for sale on EBay. I just replaced it with the new high-res HP 2140 which has an Intel graphics chip instead of the VIA OpenChrome chip. The Intel chip works well in Intrepid and totally *blows* under Jaunty due to the introduction of brand new and buggy Intel drivers. ** Attachment added: X11 Xorg.conf for VESA driver http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26022280/xorg.conf -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
[NOTE: WORK-AROUND AVAILABLE] I can reproduce ezgumol's observation with the added twist that the wireless network goes down *immediately* upon starting 'xine'. I don't have to go to full screen at all. It it takes is playing a movie in xine. I ran a 'ping' in one window and xine in another and as soon as xine started the movie the 'ping' stopped and shortly later the wireless was reported down. Further, 'dmesg' shows the 'Radio hardware status changed to DISABLED' message coincident with starting 'xine'. So, there apparently *is* an interaction between the Jaunty openchrome video driver and the B43 wireless driver. (The HP2133 uses a CN896 Chome 9 video chip that, by default, runs with the 'openchome' driver). I replaced the openchrome driver with the basic 'vesa' driver by adding 'Driver vesa' to the device section in the file /etc/X11/xorg.conf. This forces X to use 'vesa' instead of automatically loading 'openchrome'. For example: Section Device Identifier Configured Video Device Driver vesa Add this line EndSection (You will need to reboot for this to take affect). Once the 2133 is running under the 'vesa' driver, the problem goes away. I ran multiple trials with the vesa driver versus the default openchrome driver and 'xine' always killed the wireless with 'openchrome'. 'Xine' with the 'vesa' driver *never* killed the wireless. I can run xine in a window, or full screen (albeit slowly), without any ill effect on wireless. You can solve the wireless issue if you're willing to live without openchrome video acceleration. This is a significant point. I filed this bug because wireless started failing when I was testing Jaunty on a machine that normally runs Intrepid without issue. This is significant because I don't run 'openchrome' under Intrepid! That driver was pretty immature under Intrepid so, instead, I use the VIA proprietary driver for the Chrome 9 video chip under Intrepid. This driver works well, and provides the best acceleration, but its not yet available for Jaunty. Given this data, it would probably be productive to get the OpenChrome folks involved in trouble shooting this problem. -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
I tweaked /etc/apt/sources.list and added the intrepid package repository so I could force a downgrade of the HAL packages. I downgraded hal, libhal1, and libhal-storage from version 0.5.12-rc1+git20090403 to version 0.5.11-4ubuntu4 (i.e. intrepid's version). I hoped to show that this bug was introduced in the HAL subsystem. Unfortunately, downgrading these packages prevents X from starting. The screen comes up but then the laptop freezes so I can't say whether the wireless networking disconnects have improved. I reverted that change, apt-get updated and upgraded this morning (4/9/09), and restored Jaunty to working order. Unfortunately, the wireless disconnect problem is still (as you would expect) present. Wireless goes down 5 or so minutes after rebooting. I'm trying here folks but I'm not sufficiently familiar with HAL to see where to go next to demonstrate whether this is a HAL bug or some other user space application. Andrew Aylett has already shown that reverting back to the Intrepid kernel doesn't fix the problem. I verified weeks ago that the B43 firmware hasn't changed. So, what can I do to help troubleshoot this bug? It's not going away by itself. -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
Following up on Andrew Aylett's posting, I too see the HAL layer incorrectly deciding the radio has been turned off: Start monitoring devicelist: - 06:49:15.023: computer_power_supply_battery_BAT1 property battery.voltage.current = 12512 (0x30e0) 06:53:08.928: platform_i8042_i8042_KBD_port_logicaldev_input added 06:58:42.785: computer_logicaldev_input_3 condition ButtonPressed = wlan 06:58:42.832: ssb__null__rfkill_b43_phy0_wlan property killswitch.state = 0 (0x0) 06:58:45.260: computer_logicaldev_input_3 removed 06:58:45.311: ssb__null__rfkill_b43_phy0_wlan removed 06:58:45.352: leds_b43_phy0_tx removed 06:58:45.360: computer_rfkill__null__unknown added 06:58:45.418: leds_b43_phy0_rx removed 06:58:45.442: leds_b43_phy0_radio removed 06:58:52.014: ssb__null__rfkill_b43_phy0_wlan added 06:58:52.430: computer_logicaldev_input_3 added 06:58:54.018: computer_logicaldev_input_3 removed 06:58:54.132: ssb__null__rfkill_b43_phy0_wlan removed 06:58:54.189: computer_rfkill__null__unknown_0 added 06:59:08.011: computer_power_supply_battery_BAT1 property battery.voltage.current = 12510 (0x30de) I wonder if the platform 'quirks' that are embedded in the HAL subsystem have changed between Intrepid and Jaunty. -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
Still locks up with the acpitool disabling wakeup. I tried without explicitly disabling iwconfig power management and with explicitly setting power management off with iwconfig. (Note that on my config power management in iwconfig is off by default so the latter experiment was really pretty futile). FWIW, the acpitool -w command under Intrepid and Jaunty shows exactly the same thing, two devices, BLAN and SLPB, whose 'status' is disabled and '*enabled', respectively. I 'disabled' wakeup on SLPB under Jaunty and it still locked up after 5 minutes. Since this works fine in Intrepid but fails in Jaunty (at least on my model of the HP 2133), the ACPI wakeup doesn't appear to be related to the failure. -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
Upgraded all Jaunty packages to latest (Beta) version. Problem still occurs. It does seem like something like ACPI or some other power management subsystem is shutting down the radio unexpectedly (and differently from Intrepid). This is reported in dmesg at the time of the failure: [ 1016.000206] b43-phy0: Radio hardware status changed to DISABLED [ 1020.049187] wlan0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:1f:90:e0:19:75 - assume out of range [ 1020.196141] b43-phy0: Radio turned on by software [ 1020.196154] b43-phy0: The hardware RF-kill button still turns the radio physically off. Press the button to turn it on. [ 1021.697906] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:1f:90:e0:19:75 try 1 [ 1021.698028] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:1f:90:e0:19:75 try 1 [ 1021.898144] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:1f:90:e0:19:75 try 2 [ 1022.096054] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:1f:90:e0:19:75 try 3 [ 1022.296627] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:1f:90:e0:19:75 timed out Canonical Kernel Team: I'm sure you're busy trying to close out the release, and this bug appears to only affect one platform (so far), but can you please make some suggestions about experiments we could try to help narrow down the root cause of this problem? Thanks. -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
Mine goes down w/o blanking the screen. It happens when the laptop is idle (but not blanking) and I had it happen while downloading data from the Web. I'm up for running experiments but I'm at a loss as to what I should be trying. What would it take to install the Intrepid NetworkManager on Jaunty? Maybe we revert that and see what happens? -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
I retried the 'power off' work-around and it still failed to prevent my laptop's wireless from dropping after 5 or 10 minutes. I also figured out why the work-around was ineffective. The wireless power management was already OFF *before* I did the 'iwconfig power off' command. (I ran 'iwconfig' to get the essid and noticed power management was OFF). I ran the 'iwconfig power off' command anyway and, as you'd expect, it was ineffective because power management is off by default on my laptop. FWIW, I tried enabling power management (iwconfig ... power on) and that did not help either. -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
Problem still exists in Jaunty Alpha 6. (Note, I upgraded packages; I did not do a fresh install). -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
I tried the work-around suggested by Antareus and it did not help. The wireless still lost connectivity. It did seem like it took longer to disconnect with power management disabled but that's only one data point. I'm actually encouraged by this result because my HP-2133's BCM4312 wireless runs flawlessly under Ubuntu Intrepid. That makes me think Antareus has some other issue with his wireless on Intrepid that is distinct from the one reported in this bug. This bug documents a regression that occurs due to the upgrade from Intrepid to Jaunty. -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
This problem still exists in Alpha 5 or, at least, the latest packages as of 3/4/09 around noon GMT. Can we get someone assigned to this bug? Its not going to make much progress while assigned to 'nobody'. Thanks, Ben McCann -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
As requested... ** Attachment added: Outpuy of lspci -vv http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22981734/lspci.out -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] Re: [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
and... ** Attachment added: dmesg output from boot to wireless disconnect http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22981753/dmesg.log -- [HP 2133 MiniNote laptop] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331952] [NEW] Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver
/0x520 [b43] Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328520] [f800e9a2] ? b43_rfkill_init+0x142/0x1d0 [b43] Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328559] [f7ffea17] b43_op_start+0x147/0x1a0 [b43] Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328630] [f7e3f10a] ieee80211_open+0x32a/0x830 [mac80211] Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328651] [c014c88a] ? hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x3a/0x90 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328669] [c04e3c99] ? schedule_hrtimeout_range+0xe9/0x150 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328687] [c0417312] dev_open+0xa2/0xe0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328702] [c04e4d31] ? _spin_unlock_bh+0x11/0x20 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328716] [c041674a] ? dev_set_rx_mode+0x2a/0x40 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328730] [c04169c1] dev_change_flags+0x131/0x1c0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328749] [c041f80d] do_setlink+0x1ed/0x3a0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328766] [c0431103] ? nla_reserve+0x43/0x60 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328781] [c041f10f] ? rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x2cf/0x3b0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328797] [c041faa1] rtnl_setlink+0xe1/0x120 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328813] [c0430270] ? netlink_dump_start+0x130/0x170 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328828] [c041f9c0] ? rtnl_setlink+0x0/0x120 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328843] [c041ebf5] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x165/0x200 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328858] [c041f1f0] ? rtnl_dump_ifinfo+0x0/0xa0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328874] [c041ea90] ? rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x200 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.32] [c0430116] netlink_rcv_skb+0x76/0xa0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328903] [c041ea7c] rtnetlink_rcv+0x1c/0x30 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328916] [c042f89d] netlink_unicast+0x25d/0x290 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328931] [c043091b] netlink_sendmsg+0x1cb/0x2b0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328946] [c040921a] sock_sendmsg+0xea/0x110 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328964] [c0298b40] ? apparmor_socket_recvmsg+0x10/0x20 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328981] [c0148bf0] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.328996] [c0148bf0] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329013] [c02bdb65] ? copy_from_user+0x35/0x130 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329031] [c04106f0] ? verify_iovec+0x30/0xb0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329044] [c0409351] sys_sendmsg+0x111/0x230 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329057] [c0409574] ? sys_sendto+0xb4/0xd0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329070] [c041518d] ? __dev_get_by_name+0x7d/0xa0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329084] [c02bdc96] ? copy_to_user+0x36/0x120 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329103] [c0407410] ? sock_destroy_inode+0x10/0x20 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329122] [c01c985a] ? destroy_inode+0x2a/0x50 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329137] [c01ca192] ? generic_forget_inode+0x152/0x170 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329152] [c0409b05] sys_socketcall+0xd5/0x2b0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329173] [c01b50a9] ? filp_close+0x49/0x70 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329188] [c01b514a] ? sys_close+0x7a/0xc0 Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329203] [c0103f6b] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x2f Feb 17 08:23:08 Polaris kernel: [ 2518.329214] ---[ end trace 81079ab9ec490f87 ]--- Feb 17 08:23:09 Polaris kernel: [ 2519.508098] b43-phy0 ERROR: Microcode not responding Feb 17 08:23:09 Polaris kernel: [ 2519.508117] b43-phy0 ERROR: You must go to http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43#devicefirmware and download the latest firmware (version 4). I considered loading a different version of the B43 firmware as suggested but the firmware stored under /lib/firmware/b43 is identical between Ubuntu Intrepid and Jaunty. (I binary compared all the files and verified each uses the same firmware version (broadcom- wl-4.150.10.5.tar.bz2). The install_bcm43xx_firmware.sh scripts in Intrepid and Jaunty are also identical. So, I don't think this is a firmware issue despite the fact the driver wants new firmware. This firmware is fine in Intrepid. I think something else in the b43, wl, or ssb driver has regressed. Or, perhaps there's been a regression in network-manager. I'm happy to help any way necessary to find this bug. -Ben McCann ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Unexpected and unrecoverable wireless disconnect with B43 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284162] Re: [intrepid] network-manager, missing icon on the system tray or notification area after switching to a different user
Following up on yesterday's comment... I started customizing an alternate user account in the hope that I could migrate my stuff from one user name to another just to get around this bug. (If you can fix the bug, then work-around it). During the course of configuring the desktop for that new account, the damn NetworkManager icon minimized back to a 1x1 invisible image again. So, at least for me, I have no work-around (via moving accounts) and no visable network manager icon. For what its worth, I am running Xubuntu 8.10 with XFCE4 and it is fully up to date according to Synaptic. The customizations I made to my desktop included (in roughly this order): * Move every component on Panel 2 to Panel 1. * Remove Panel 2. * Move Panel 1 from the top of the screen to the right side. * Disable titles in the Launchers to reduce panel width. * Change the window manager theme to 'microcurve'. * Add a new launcher (for Thunderbird). I logged out and back in between my two user accounts as I checked on settings in the old account and moved them to the new account. During one of those logout/login cycles the Network Manager icon disappeared. Note that I did *not* try any shortcuts like copying files from ~/.config in one account to the other. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. -- [intrepid] network-manager, missing icon on the system tray or notification area after switching to a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284162 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284162] Re: [intrepid] network-manager, missing icon on the system tray or notification area after switching to a different user
This isn't a problem in NetworkManager. I finally found the right bug that describes the behavior *and* which offers a viable work-around. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/139424 (Bug #139424). The issue is that icon scaling in the System Tray doesn't work well if the Panel is vertical instead of horizontal. The icons can be brought back by moving the panel to the top or bottom of the screen and then moving it back to vertical. -- [intrepid] network-manager, missing icon on the system tray or notification area after switching to a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284162 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284162] Re: [intrepid] network-manager, missing icon on the system tray or notification area after switching to a different user
I've been fighting with NetworkManager with the problem that it runs but doesn't show up in the system tray. Actually, its there but it has a 1x1 icon which is a bitch to find, but, if you find it, it works. (Alex, I posted a similar complaint to bug 282835 last month). I found this bug and one other this evening that hinted that the missing icons can be repaired by creating a different user account I tried that and indeed the network manager icon's are present in the system tray in the newly created user account. Something is awry in my main (and preferred) user account. Has anyone found a solution to this problem? It appears nm-applet can't find the required icon files but I have no idea how to prove or fix that. I found one bug (that I can't find again) that said something about upgrades from Hardy to Intrepid loosing because version 0.6 of the network manager were located or named differently than icons in version 0.7. -- [intrepid] network-manager, missing icon on the system tray or notification area after switching to a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284162 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282835] Re: Network Manager fails to start
My xubuntu 8.10 is fully up to date and its still broken. I'd be happy to help trouble-shoot it. I'm an experienced Linux user and software developer so I'd be happy to dig into anything including attaching GDB to a daemon if it would help dig out the cause of this problem. Its super annoying when the network's not working to not be able to pull up the nm-applet. -- Network Manager fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 282835] Re: Network Manager fails to start
From 'dpkg -l': ii network-manager-gnome 0.7~~svn20081020t000444-0ubuntu1.8.10.1 network management framework (GNOME frontend) -Ben McCann Alexander Sack wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:59:03AM -, Ben McCann wrote: My xubuntu 8.10 is fully up to date and its still broken. I'd be happy to help trouble-shoot it. I'm an experienced Linux user and software developer so I'd be happy to dig into anything including attaching GDB to a daemon if it would help dig out the cause of this problem. Its super annoying when the network's not working to not be able to pull up the nm-applet. which package version are you running for network-manager-gnome? - Alexander -- Network Manager fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282835] Re: Network Manager fails to start
I don't know if this is the right bug for this comment, but its the closest I've found so far. My NetworkManager and nm-applet both work fine *except* that the nm- applet is not displayed in the notification tray. (Its actually there but apparently with a 1x1 pixel image. if you're lucky, you can get its attention with the mouse). Is this bug the best place to track this problem? If so, should we rename the bug title to something besides fails to start? If not, where can I track this? Its the only gripe I have about Xubuntu 8.1.0. BTW, this was a clean install on an HP-2133 mininote laptop using a lot of help from the Ubuntu Mininote forum. -- Network Manager fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267115] Re: Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot
I can confirm Georg's note about 'Option NoAccel'. It prevents the freeze but its then so slow that you may as well use the VESA driver. I originally noted in this bug that the cursor is off-center (down and to the right) on my mini-note before it freezes. If I use NoAccel then X comes up but the virtual desk top is TOO BIG. If I had to guess, its something like 1440x900 or 1680x1050. So, there's also a problem detecting the LCD screen resolution. I added: SubSection Display Virtual 1280 768 EndSubSection to the 'screen' section of the xorg.conf file. After rebooting, I had a properly sized display. (FWIW, using 'Option ForcePanel' did not detect the screen size correctly. I had to force the virtual desktop size). Ever the optimist, I then enabled acceleration (commented out the option noaccel) with the explicitly sized virtual desktop. But, after rebooting, the X server still hangs with the one difference being the mouse cursor is in the center of the screen. I guess that counts as progress ;-) -- Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267115] Re: Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot
The new openchrome xserver did not help. I updated and then ran several experiments, all with the same result: 1) 'Default xorg.conf with no driver selection, 2) xorg.conf with explicit 'driver openchrome' selection 3) xorg.conf with explicit: driver openchrome options EnableAGPDMA 0 (I found a note someplace that this would help). I verified the correct openchrome driver was installed using 'dpkg-query -s xserver-xorg-video-openchrome'. It reports version 1:0.2.903-0ubuntu2. I've been trolling through /var/log/kern.log and /var/log/messages and I noticed that the last message emitted by Linux before the crash is always: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 I looked around in LP for other DRM bugs but I don't see one that matches this failure mode. (Doesn't mean its not there, its just not obvious to me). It's also possible this was the last successful operation and that its unrelated. I tried 'modprobe drm' while on the console in recovery mode (prior to starting X) and it loaded the drm kernel module w/o error. I also ran 'modprobe via' to load the kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via.ko module and that also worked. I'm out of ideas about where to look next... -- Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267115] Re: Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot
No change with 'Option DRI false'. Still locks up with openchrome. FWIW, the openchrome driver included in Hardy works OK with on the Mininote. Note, I normally don't use that and instead use the VIA proprietary drivers. Unfortunately, those are locked to one kernel version so have to 'hold' the kernel to prevent a kernel update from breaking the video driver. I want to get away from that in Intrepid. Last, I booted the Hardy kernel (2.6.24-16) but mounted the Intrepid '/' file system. The 'vesa' driver works but the 'openchrome' driver still fails. -- Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267115] Re: Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot
Here's the Xorg.0.log from Hardy running the openchrome video driver... I may have debris left from the VIA proprietary driver on my Intrepid partition because I created it by copying a working Hardy install, with the VIA driver, and then upgrading it to Intrepid. However, I don't think that's adding to this problem because I first encountered this problem trying to run the Intreprid Live CD. I did the upgrade just to provide a workable debugging environment. And, it really shouldnb't matter which drivers are on the disk if I explicitly select one using the 'Driver' statement in the xorg.conf. (I could believe that auto-config may get confused but an explicit driver selection should take precedence). ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17954440/Xorg.0.log -- Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223110] Re: kernel panic on boot after upgrading from 7.10 to 8.04
I hit this same bug upgrading from Hardy to Intrepid Alpha 6. This is a killer for linux newbies and really should be addressed before Intrepid completes. I always use two root file systems so I can fall back if an upgrade fails. Most people aren't that paranoid and hence this bug will BRICK their computer until they boot (and possibly reinstall) from external media. -- kernel panic on boot after upgrading from 7.10 to 8.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223110 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267115] Re: Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot
I repartitioned my HP 2133's disk when it first arrived to support two root file systems. I cloned my working Hardy root file system from one '/' to the other and then ran a dist-upgrade to convert that to Intrepid Alpha 6. This was successful so I can now run experiments on the X server. The first boot into X resulted in a low-resolution, degraded, X configuration. A dialog box (I don't recall the details) let me select the 'default' X configuration. This bricked my X installation just like described above. I tried 'repairing' it a couple times in recovery mode to no avail. I then found and copied /etc/X11/xorg.conf.failsafe to /etc/X11/xorg.conf. This works correctly, but slowly. I diff'ed the original 'default' xorg.conf file and the failsafe file uses: driver vesa where the original default config file leaves this blank. (I'm guessing X tries to auto-configure). I guess this auto-configuration code is guessing the wrong type of video chip set? This laptop uses a VIA Chrome9 chip that isn't exactly mainstream. I've taken this a long way towards resolution by providing a platform to repro this failure and actually get some results. If there's more I can do then please let me know. Meanwhile, I'm going to see if the OpenChrome server is available for Intrepid. -- Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267115] Re: Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 179675 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179675 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 179675 Ubuntu LiveCD doesn't start with a VIA Chrome9 HC graphic card and, when Ubuntu is installed, it works only with VESA drivers -- Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179675] Re: Ubuntu LiveCD doesn't start with a VIA Chrome9 HC graphic card and, when Ubuntu is installed, it works only with VESA drivers
I marked bug 267115 as a duplicate of this bug. I could not get Intrepid to load the LiveCD. (But, I did not try the 'secure mode' install). I was able to get it installed by upgrading from Hardy to Intrepid and then manually selecting the xorg.conf.failsafe config file that uses the VESA driver. For some reason, I never encountered this problem with Hardy, possibly because I used the kernel arg 'xforcevesa'. I tried that with Intrepid and it apparently had no affect. The X server would not start correctly until I explicitly set: driver vesa in xorg.conf. -- Ubuntu LiveCD doesn't start with a VIA Chrome9 HC graphic card and, when Ubuntu is installed, it works only with VESA drivers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179675] Re: Ubuntu LiveCD doesn't start with a VIA Chrome9 HC graphic card and, when Ubuntu is installed, it works only with VESA drivers
Explicitly selecting the openchrome driver using: driver openchrome in the xorg.conf file locks up the X server exactly as described in bug 267115. So, I infer that the X server is selecting the driver correctly but that the openchrome driver is busted in Intrepid. -- Ubuntu LiveCD doesn't start with a VIA Chrome9 HC graphic card and, when Ubuntu is installed, it works only with VESA drivers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267115] Re: Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot
(Update from bug originator) I tried the Intrepid Alpha 6 and got the same result. The X server hangs shortly after blanking the screen and putting up the initial mouse cursor. I'm currently running the VIA proprietary drivers on Ubuntu Hardy. That, plus the original VESA X.org drivers worked OK on this HP-2133 Mininote laptop. I'm including some of the output from the Xorg.0.log file on Hardy to better document the chipset, etc, within this laptop: (II) Module vbe: vendor=X.Org Foundation compiled for 1.4.0.90, module version = 1.1.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 2.0 (II) VIA(0): VESA BIOS detected (II) VIA(0): VESA VBE Version 3.0 (II) VIA(0): VESA VBE Total Mem: 32768 kB (II) VIA(0): VESA VBE OEM: VIA N3364^M (II) VIA(0): VESA VBE OEM Software Rev: 1.0 (II) VIA(0): VESA VBE OEM Vendor: (II) VIA(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: (II) VIA(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: (II) VIA(0): MapBase = b78d2000, MmioBase=fc00 (II) VIA(0): RegCR08 = 0, RegCR09=4f (--) VIA(0): Chipset: P4M900 (--) VIA(0): Chipset Rev.: 0 (**) VIA(0): Option ActiveDevice LCD,CRT (**) VIA(0): Option DisplayHardwareLayout LCD (**) VIA(0): Option PanelID 3 (**) VIA(0): Option NoDDCValue (**) VIA(0): Option VideoOnDevice LCD (**) VIA(0): Option ForceLCD (==) VIA(0): Not using video BIOS to set modes (**) VIA(0): Option: Not using DDC probed value to set HorizSync VertRefresh (II) VIA(0): MergedFB mode forced off. (**) VIA(0): Active Device is LCD,CRT. (**) VIA(0): Display Hardware Layout is LCD (--) VIA(0): mapping framebuffer @ 0xd000 with size 0x800 (==) VIA(0): Write-combining range (0xd000,0x800) (--) VIA(0): Frame buffer start: 0xaf64d000, free start: 0x3c end: 0x80\ 0 (--) VIA(0): mapping MMIO @ 0xfc00 with size 0x9000 (--) VIA(0): mapping BitBlt MMIO @ 0xfc20 with size 0x20 (II) VIA(0): vgaHWGetIOBase: hwp-IOBase is 0x03d0, hwp-PIOOffset is 0x (EE) VIA(0): Couldn't open /dev/video2 (II) VIA(0): VIAScreenInit : V4L Disabled : fd2 = -1 (II) VIA(0): [drm] Detect H5s1 chipset: 000a chipid: 3371 I can get more data on request. -- Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267115] Re: Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot
The Hp-2133 needs the boot option acpi_os=!Windows 2006 to run Hardy correctly. (I don't why but its documented in the Ubuntu mininote forum at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=749693). I manually added this to the boot command line prior to booting the 'test drive without installing' boot option. This had NO effect. The X server still hung as described earlier. -- Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267115] Re: Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot
** Summary changed: - Intrepid Alpha 6, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot + Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot ** Description changed: - I'm trying to boot the Intrepid Ibex Alpha 6 Live CD from USB on my HP + I'm trying to boot the Intrepid Ibex Alpha 5 Live CD from USB on my HP 2133 Mininote Laptop. (The 2133 is running Hardy almost flawlessly right now). I select 'try live cd' boot option and then the grub splash screen works fine. I get the normal ubuntu progress bar. The progress bar runs to completion and then the screen blanks as the X server starts. I then get the normal X windows 'busy' cursor used with Ubuntu. (Round white circle with black dots around the edge). However, the cursor is off center and corrupted a bit. But, most importantly, the laptop is completely frozen. I tried booting with 'xforcevesa' with no success. I also hit 'esc' in Grub and then 'f4' to select the 'safe graphics mode' option and that also failed. I'd be happy to try any experiments that you recommend to trouble-shoot this. For example, are there other Linux boot options (such as 'video' or 'vga') that would dumb-down the live CD X installer enough to get a handle on what's going wrong? -- Intrepid Alpha 5, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267115] [NEW] Intrepid Alpha 6, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot
Public bug reported: I'm trying to boot the Intrepid Ibex Alpha 6 Live CD from USB on my HP 2133 Mininote Laptop. (The 2133 is running Hardy almost flawlessly right now). I select 'try live cd' boot option and then the grub splash screen works fine. I get the normal ubuntu progress bar. The progress bar runs to completion and then the screen blanks as the X server starts. I then get the normal X windows 'busy' cursor used with Ubuntu. (Round white circle with black dots around the edge). However, the cursor is off center and corrupted a bit. But, most importantly, the laptop is completely frozen. I tried booting with 'xforcevesa' with no success. I also hit 'esc' in Grub and then 'f4' to select the 'safe graphics mode' option and that also failed. I'd be happy to try any experiments that you recommend to trouble-shoot this. For example, are there other Linux boot options (such as 'video' or 'vga') that would dumb-down the live CD X installer enough to get a handle on what's going wrong? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Intrepid Alpha 6, HP Mininote 2133, Live CD, X Server Hangs after Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201890] Re: ubuntu does not support frequency scaling with intel T9300
I can't load acpi-cpufreq on an HP-2133 Mini-note with a VIA C7-M processor. (This seemed like the closest bug to comment on instead of opening yet another bug). I'm running Hardy Heron RC1 updated as of 4/24/08. The laptop has a dual-boot config between Xubuntu Hardy and Suse Enterprise 10 (which it came with). The Suse Enterprise 10 kernel _does_ work with acpi-cpufreq. That kernel is 2.6.16.54-0.2.5-default. I found the following note on a fedora forum which seems to imply the 2.6.24 kernel (also used in Hardy) had a regression in the ACPI code that broke cpufreq: * Wed Mar 19 2008 Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.6.24.3-48 - Revert the ACPI sizeof patch that fixes BZ 437466 because it breaks acpi-cpufreq. The full link for this change log is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=43392. Do these patches have to be integrated into the next Ubuntu Hardy kernel? -- ubuntu does not support frequency scaling with intel T9300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs