** Also affects: nova
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101187
Title:
in case ow two networks on the same bridge nova
** Also affects: nova
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101187
Title:
in case ow two networks on the same bridge nova overwrites dnsmasq
Public bug reported:
Some background: I run a private cloud environment (folsom/stable,
FlatDhcp) in the 172.17.11.XXX/24 range. The private range for instances
is 192.168.100.XX/24 . Basically if I add a floating IP it get's
assigned from the 172.17.11.XX/24 range. Recently, I needed to assign
Public bug reported:
Some background: I run a private cloud environment (folsom/stable,
FlatDhcp) in the 172.17.11.XXX/24 range. The private range for instances
is 192.168.100.XX/24 . Basically if I add a floating IP it get's
assigned from the 172.17.11.XX/24 range. Recently, I needed to assign
What happens if I trun on the cleanup and I have instances residing on a
glusterfs. Briefly reading the code (Ubuntu essex release) the image
does not get marked in use and will be removed. Is that correct?
If so, would this be configurable let's say with a
instances_path_is_shared flag?
--
You
What happens if I trun on the cleanup and I have instances residing on a
glusterfs. Briefly reading the code (Ubuntu essex release) the image
does not get marked in use and will be removed. Is that correct?
If so, would this be configurable let's say with a
instances_path_is_shared flag?
--
You
