[Bug 1874453] Re: ubuntu/focal64 very slow to boot and reboots once
I just tried firing up 20200629.0.0 and it has the same issue. I'm also not able to terminate the VMs at all. I've waiting 10+ minutes for them to stop and nothing. I eventually just killed the PIDs for everything VirtualBox related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874453 Title: ubuntu/focal64 very slow to boot and reboots once To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1874453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203295] Re: upgrade to hardy didn't install linux-ubuntu-modules for -386 kernel
I haven't done the same upgrade on those versions, so I can't tell you. I would assume that if the upgrade is working for anyone it is fixed. -- upgrade to hardy didn't install linux-ubuntu-modules for -386 kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 207787] Re: Multiple tomcat instances
I replied to your thread post. I don't think a source build is a good idea. Check out my reply and we can continue discussions from there. I'll also work on the Google code project for the entire thing at some point this week. -bp On Oct 7, 2009, at 6:38 AM, born2chill wrote: hi, as a start i repackaged tomcat6 for 8.04 LTS, starting from the jaunty package and using the apache source files from tomcat 6.0.20. Please consider this post on the forums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=8066371postcount=4 also the new packages are up for grabs here: http://aegis.dest-unreachable.net/debs/tomcat/ how do we want to continue the multi instance effort? br, David -- Multiple tomcat instances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207787 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Multiple tomcat instances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207787] Re: Multiple tomcat instances
David, Great suggestions. I've actually abandoned the Tomcat 5.5 project and I've also stopped using all of the Tomcat packages in the repositories. The Tomcat packages in the repository are completely invalid. If you download Tomcat from Apache and compare it to the Tomcat from the repository packages, they contain different JAR files and this causes major issues with some applications. Tomcat specifically repackages certain libraries from Apache Commons to avoid naming and version conflicts. The Tomcat packages from the repositories use the Apache Commons libraries instead and this is incorrect. Rather than continue using Tomcat 5.5 and keeping my scripts up to date, I've written a new set of packages for Tomcat 6 that do a number of things differently. - First, they install a correct version of Tomcat that is identical to the version downloaded from Apache - Second, it provides a very clean install that makes it much simpler to update. My previous scripts assumed you were installing the packages from the repositories and then really moved things around. This caused major issues with updates. - Third, the new packages are completely based on multiple instances. This is much better because it can support a single instance or multiple instances without any issues. - I use much more standard locations for everything now. Here's the thread over at the forums about these new packages: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1211517 I'd like to see this packages incorporated into the main repositories once they are cleaned up some. I love the options you have added to your new_instance scripts and would welcome your assistance with adding those to my packages. I much prefer using a separate script for removing instances to reduce confusion. However, if the script was named tomcat6_manager.sh or something like that, it would be okay. 2 scripts still seems better though. -- Multiple tomcat instances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207787] Re: Multiple tomcat instances
I was using the same method for my init scripts via symlinks and I changed it to a real file because I found myself tweaking the scripts quite a bit and modifying the parameters and options for each instance. This could still be done by sourcing additional scripts for each instance, but that's somewhat counter-intuitive for the next person coming along. It is definitely something we could discuss. Let me know when you check out the new Tomcat6 packages and how you want to proceed. There is very little from the Ubuntu and Debian folks, so I figure we should just charge forward for now. Also, Redhat, Fedora, and CentOS all have the same issues with their Tomcat distributions and it might be nice to roll RPMs as well at some point. -- Multiple tomcat instances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207787] Re: Multiple tomcat instances
You can check them out from my Google code project here: svn checkout http://debian-tomcat-scripts.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ debian-tomcat-scripts-read-only Or visit the project page at: http://code.google.com/p/debian-tomcat-scripts -- Multiple tomcat instances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207787] Re: Multiple tomcat instances
This sorta covers the case, but not entirely. This creates instances for developers. My scripts and solution create multiple instances on servers. Often companies run multiple instances of Tomcat on a server to scale things up and also run different webapps on a single server in separate Tomcat instances. In order to use this solution in the same manner, I'd have to create multiple users on the server and then setup instances for each user. Your solution will work as long as it provides init scripts for each user Tomcat instance. Otherwise, it is not the same solution and won't work on servers. -- Multiple tomcat instances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218721] [NEW] [Hardy] Compiz crashing system
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz After updating to the latest compiz, I figured this bug would be fixed, but it is not. Here's the issue: When Thunderbird or some other application pops up a dialog, usually from another virtual desktop onto the current virtual desktop, Compiz spikes to 100% CPU usage and the system is hung. I can however change to another TTY (I think that is what they are called) using CTRL-ALT-F1. This is how I can see that compiz is using 100% CPU. The process is named compiz.real. In order to fix this I have to restart X using CTRL- ALT-BACKSPACE or kill the compiz.real process (effective restarting X). This is pretty frequent. One to two times per day or more. It is pretty simple for me to reproduce and at this point is a complete show stopper for Hardy on my setup. Here are my systems specs: Dell Dimension 9150 nVidia (not sure exact specs, can get them if necessary) Hardy latest updates (4/17/2008) upgraded from Gusty Nothing custom at all except some Compiz key-bindings and a few other desktop tweaks like background, panels, etc. ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Hardy] Compiz crashing system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218721] Re: [Hardy] Copmiz crashing system
Oops. Can someone please fix my typo on the title. This should be compiz not copmiz. It will make this bug impossible to search. I'll wait for a few minutes to see if someone fixes it, otherwise I will open another bug with the correct title. ** Summary changed: - [Hardy] Copmiz crashing system + [Hardy] Compiz crashing system -- [Hardy] Compiz crashing system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218721] Re: [Hardy] Compiz crashing system
Nevermind, realized that this version of launchpad allows me to edit the title and description. -- [Hardy] Compiz crashing system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218721] Re: [Hardy] Compiz crashing system
This is getting worse. Compiz is now consuming 100% CPU all of the time and my system is getting hammered. Can someone please review this bug and advise. -- [Hardy] Compiz crashing system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218721] Re: [Hardy] Compiz crashing system
Some more investigation... If I turn off visual effects and log out and back in, compiz.real is still eating up 100% CPU. I'm going to try rebooting, but this is pretty bad. Luckily I have 2 CPUs so I'm not totally out of commission. -- [Hardy] Compiz crashing system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216043] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
This bug might be related. I opened it today because compiz.real was crashing as well as consuming 100% CPU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/218721 -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218721] Re: [Hardy] Compiz crashing system
Rebooted, nothing. Removed all compiz packages and reboot and now everything is back to normal. Compiz is definitely not ready for this release quite yet. -- [Hardy] Compiz crashing system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185854] Re: Setting static IP in Network Settings doesn't produce correct data
Here's the upstream bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=526137 -- Setting static IP in Network Settings doesn't produce correct data https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185854 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 12153] Re: Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts
I tried the layout tweak with Super is mapped to the Win-keys and it doesn't work for me. The keyboard-shortcuts application then interprets the Win-key as Mod4 and will allow me to set things to something like Mod4+P, but the rest of Gnome doesn't see the key event once set. I don't have anything funky in my xorg.conf file and something else that is odd is that compiz settings interpret the Win-key just fine. They allow me to set shortcuts using it and get the correct signals. -- Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209280] Re: [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode
I'm managed to calm the networking stack by rebooting and then taking everything out of roaming mode and placing it into static IP addresses. The reboot was necessary because after these failures occurred the Network Management application kept telling me that I didn't have permissions to change the networking information. This seems like a related issue, but something else that should be investigated. -- [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209280 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 211134] [NEW] [Hardy] update-manager could not update
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager This seems like a new bug in the latest updates. I have around 199 updates available and update-manager says, Not all updates can be installed. Run a partial upgrade, to install as many updates as possible. ... Clicking Partial Upgrade produces this error: Could not calculate the upgrade. An unresolvable problem... This is most likely a transient problem, please try again later. I've attached my log file. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Hardy] update-manager could not update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 211134] Re: [Hardy] update-manager could not update
** Attachment added: Apt log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13082437/apt.log -- [Hardy] update-manager could not update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 211066] Re: [2.6.24-14] Cannot upgrade linux-restricted-modules-generic
Still not working. Did an update and tried to run the partial-upgrade again with the same message. -- [2.6.24-14] Cannot upgrade linux-restricted-modules-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209280] Re: [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode
As it turns out this bug is slowly becoming a blocker. This is now happening even with roaming mode disabled, using DHCP or static IPs. My network is completely unstable and at random will stop working completely. -- [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209280 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209280] [NEW] [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager I have a single wired connection (eth0) that is set to use roaming mode. NetworkManager starts up fine when I log in but then begins to spin. It is trying to get a DHCP connection over and over. If I change the connection to not use roaming mode and just use DHCP it works fine. The error from my syslog looks like this (it is repeated many times over). Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info SWITCH: no current connection, found better connection 'eth0'. Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Will activate connection 'eth0'. Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Device eth0 activation scheduled... Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) started... Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) scheduled... Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) started... Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) scheduled... Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) complete. Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) starting... Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) successful. Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) scheduled. Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete. Mar 30 10:16:17 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) started... Mar 30 10:16:19 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Beginning DHCP transaction. Mar 30 10:16:19 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Couldn't send DHCP 'up' message because: name 'com.redhat.dhcp.OperationInProgress', message 'interface eth0 is being released. Please try again la ter.'. Mar 30 10:16:19 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) failure scheduled... Mar 30 10:16:19 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) complete. Mar 30 10:16:19 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) failed. Mar 30 10:16:19 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Deactivating device eth0. I'm also seeing something from dhcdbd: Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info SWITCH: no current connection, found better connection 'eth0'. Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: WARN nm_dhcp_manager_get_state_for_device(): dhcdbd not running! Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Will activate connection 'eth0'. Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Device eth0 activation scheduled... Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) started... Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) scheduled... Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) started... Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) scheduled... Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) complete. Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) starting... Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) successful. Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) scheduled. Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete. Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) started... Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: WARN nm_dhcp_manager_begin_transaction(): dhcdbd not running! Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) failure scheduled... Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) complete. Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) failed. Mar 30 10:08:38 bpontarelli-desktop NetworkManager: info Deactivating device eth0. I've attached my syslog for you to work with. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode
[Bug 209280] Re: [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode
** Attachment added: syslog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12979321/syslog -- [Hardy] Network manager failing in roaming mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209280 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 204623] Re: evolution-data-server-2.22 high cpu utilization
Same issue on a dual core dell. Nothing extra installed. Upgrade from Gusty. Don't use evolution. No wireless. I have other issues with networking that are annoying. The nm-applet is constantly spinning and sometimes it takes 10-15 minutes to get a solid DHCP connection. -- evolution-data-server-2.22 high cpu utilization https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151536] Re: Hangs on login and uses 100% cpu
This is still an issue with all updates to Hardy on 3/28/2008. There is also another bug tracking this with much less information. Someone on the Ubuntu team should collapse into a single bug that is still open, active and a high priority and possibly linked upstream. The other bug is 204623: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data- server/+bug/204623 -- Hangs on login and uses 100% cpu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207787] [NEW] Multiple tomcat instances
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat5.5 This is an enhancement. I have written some scripts that change the standard debian/Ubuntu tomcat packages to allow multiple tomcat instances on a single system. They provide the following features: - Setup system to allow multiple instances - Provide scripts to creating and removing instances including init.d scripts and configuration I've posted these on my blog and a lot of folks have been using them. I think it would be great if we could roll these back into the standard distribution. I couldn't figure out who was the upstream-debian maintainer, so I figured I would submit an issue here and we could pull them in as we go. I'll attach my files to the issue so you can start looking them over. They will need some work, but for the most part they are fully functional. ** Affects: tomcat5.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Multiple tomcat instances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203295] Re: upgrade to hardy didn't install linux-ubuntu-modules for -386 kernel
Had the exact same problem. It seems as though Hardy upgrade is selecting the wrong kernel. My guess is that you had a number of kernels installed on your system. I had about 20 or so going back to 2.6.18 days or before. After I upgraded to Hardy my system was only configured (insmod, initramfs, ldconfig, etc) for the 386 kernel, which is almost completely useless on a desktop/laptop system. The solution I found was to follow these steps: 1. Uninstall all my old kernels including 2.6.24.12-generic but level the 386 kernels installed (in case these go horribly wrong, 386 will almost always boot). 2. Uninstall linux-generic, linux-image-generic, linux-headers-generic, linux-restricted-*, etc. 3. Re-install all of the latest generic using this command: sudo apt-get install linux-generic What this does is to re-install, re-configure and re-compile a working generic kernel. After I rebooted and selected that kernel, I was able to get into linux fine and then re-install all my other restricted drivers. Sound, video, networking all work decently well. After things are running smoothly, you can safely remove all the 386 packages. This is really, really critical to fix for the full release because non- technical users will be completely lost since they usually have no clue what a kernel is and how to install and configure them. I'd make this a blocker for release if I were the Ubuntu team. Let me know if you you need logs or files from my system. I'll wait a week or so before making and huge changes in case you need something. -- upgrade to hardy didn't install linux-ubuntu-modules for -386 kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173748] Re: Gnome menu items displayed twice
I've recently deleted all of my .gconf, .gnome and other configuration directories. I was having a number of issues with Gnome, Metacity and other applications not working correctly and I figured I'd start over and see it things resolve. This computer has been upgraded all the way from 6.x and was beginning to show signs of bad configuration. I'll let you know if it comes back. -- Gnome menu items displayed twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173748] Gnome menu items displayed twice
Public bug reported: Sometimes the Gnome menu displays all of the menu items twice. This only occurs for items and not sub-menus. See the attached screenshot. The only way I can think to fix it is to log out and then back in. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Gnome menu items displayed twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173748] Re: Gnome menu items displayed twice
** Attachment added: Image of menu with duplicates http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10712426/Screenshot.png -- Gnome menu items displayed twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88210] Apache2 package requires apache to be running
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2-common When doing a dist-upgrade from Edgy to Feisty, the package for apache2-common (the old edgy version) required the Apache2 server to be running in order to correctly complete. This should check if Apache is not running, it should just continue like normal. ** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Apache2 package requires apache to be running https://launchpad.net/bugs/88210 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47758] Re: Swap partition created incorrectly and swapon always failing
Sorry, I wish I could test this, but I'm now on Edgy and have too much going on with this machine or other machines to re-install. I might be able to get to this in a few months, but my guess is that it won't help much. I could also try it with the next release (7.x) if you want. I plan on upgrading most of my machines, but I might have one that I could scrap, put RedHat on, and then install Ubuntu 7.x from there to test. -- Swap partition created incorrectly and swapon always failing https://launchpad.net/bugs/47758 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
