[Bug 1940326] Re: Request Package Dislocker 0.7.3 for bionic focal LTS systems
Still looking for LTS Support (bionic, focal) on this topic in October 2021. Repeatedly reported as an error with regard to bionic in new posts to official GitHub repo issues. https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker/issues/245 Open to further discussion. ** Bug watch added: github.com/Aorimn/dislocker/issues #245 https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker/issues/245 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940326 Title: Request Package Dislocker 0.7.3 for bionic focal LTS systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dislocker/+bug/1940326/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940326] Re: Request Package Dislocker 0.7.3 for bionic focal LTS systems
Still looking for LTS Support (bionic, focal) on this topic in August 2021. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940326 Title: Request Package Dislocker 0.7.3 for bionic focal LTS systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dislocker/+bug/1940326/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940326] [NEW] Request Package Dislocker 0.7.3 for bionic focal LTS systems
Public bug reported: https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker/issues/185 https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/commit/26f770afdc68a089f56006f107eb97a0cde7b02f bionic focal and groovy suffer from Segmentation fault errors when attempting to use up-to-date bitlocker drives with dislocker 0.7.1 hirsute and impish are not impacted, they already are at dislocker 0.7.3. Please think of the LTS users. ** Affects: dislocker (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: bionic focal groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940326 Title: Request Package Dislocker 0.7.3 for bionic focal LTS systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dislocker/+bug/1940326/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939014] Re: date/time display issue on lock screen
This occurs on bionic as well. Screenshot appreciated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939014 Title: date/time display issue on lock screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1939014/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1932200] Re: ALT+CTRL+T doesn't automatically inherit of the focus
What do you have for: $ gsettings get org.gnome.desktop.wm.preferences focus-new-windows If the value is 'strict', new windows or terminals do not take the top focus when made available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932200 Title: ALT+CTRL+T doesn't automatically inherit of the focus To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1932200/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1931568] Re: no wifi adpter found: Lenovo E41-25
** Summary changed: - I have installed the ubuntu 19.10 and since the installation it says no wifi adpter found but the wifi was working with Windows perfectly but since I switch to ubuntu I am not able to use the wifi. I have tried lots of different methods to fix this issue on the internet and also asked on Ubuntu community for help but none worked for me. It seems there's some bug on the os because during the installation the wifi was working but after the installation has completed the wifi stoped working and says No wifi adapter found. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10 Package: linux-image-5.3.0-46-generic 5.3.0-46.38 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-46.38-generic 5.3.18 Uname: Linux 5.3.0-46-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.8 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USER PID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC1: anu 2180 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: anu 2180 F pulseaudio CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Apr 10 16:31:11 2020 InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-09 (1 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017) IwConfig: lo no wireless extensions. enp0s16u3 no wireless extensions. enp1s0 no wireless extensions. MachineType: LENOVO 81FS ProcFB: 0 amdgpudrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.3.0-46-generic root=UUID=9462d35f-9a18-4b4c-8372-6429117b7939 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-5.3.0-46-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-5.3.0-46-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.183.5 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 11/14/2019 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: 7UCN28WW(V2.02) dmi.board.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216 dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: No DPK dmi.chassis.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: Lenovo E41-25 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7UCN28WW(V2.02):bd11/14/2019:svnLENOVO:pn81FS:pvrLenovoE41-25:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrNoDPK:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrLenovoE41-25: dmi.product.family: E41-25 dmi.product.name: 81FS dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_81FS_BU_idea_FM_E41-25 dmi.product.version: Lenovo E41-25 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO + no wifi adpter found: Lenovo E41-25 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931568 Title: no wifi adpter found: Lenovo E41-25 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1931568/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1927063] Re: Terminal prompt got strangely replicated when resizing terminal horizontally
Disagree with 18.04 LTS (18.04.5) comment by @nrbrtx, considering gnome- terminal. Open gnome-terminal. Change directory to long name, from first character of username to last character "$" of directory summing 60, or 61+ characters. Give it best effort and utilize "clear" command. Utilize keyboard shortcut to escape from current command, "CTRL + C", twice. Utilize keyboard shortcut to adjust window, "ALT + F8", and reduce horizontal width from the RIGHT edge to 62 characters. Notice one line of history is gone. Continue and reduce horizontal width to 58 characters. Notice an unexpected character at beginning of last line of prompt. Continue to 57 characters. The whole path is no longer visible. Continue to 56 characters. Part of the path appears inside the cursor. Continue to 55 characters. Path is now obscured. Continue to 50 characters. Notice the obscured path is no longer present, but the path is not whole. Continue and reduce horizontal width to minimum (31) from the RIGHT edge with arrow keys. Utilize keyboard shortcut to escape from current command, "CTRL + C", twice. The tool to change horizontal width has been disabled and a ^C is made visible at the last prompt, escaping to a new prompt with full path. Utilize keyboard shortcut to adjust window, "ALT + F8", and increase horizontal width from the RIGHT edge to 60 characters or 61 characters. Notice the username is obscured. If performed with 60 character line, Continue to typical 80 characters. The first letter of the username is now repeated on the last line. If performed with 61 character line, first character of username is sometimes repeated on previous line. If performed with 61+ character line, multiples of path are seen as original bug reports. You can make more lines with path appear if iterating between width of 31 and 32 characters. My example is 62 characters: userna@userna:~/userna/usernamefolder/direct/foobars/foobars$ Results: userna@userna:~/userna/usernamefolder userna@userna:~/userna/usernamefolder/direct/foobars/foobars$ Either with fast keyboard strokes or slow, there are a number of errors in line feed and character removal when adjusting the terminal width. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927063 Title: Terminal prompt got strangely replicated when resizing terminal horizontally To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1927063/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1914915] Re: Sound or Audio is breaking
Try setting the system into performance mode. https://www.cult-of-tech.net/2018/08/linux-ubuntu-cpu-power-frequency- scaling -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914915 Title: Sound or Audio is breaking To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1914915/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902177] Re: Pi 4B rev 1.4 not recognized
Just occurred to me. Do you have the most up-to-date version of gpio (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpi.gpio/0.6.5-1ubuntu0.18.04.1)? $ find /usr | grep -i gpio -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902177 Title: Pi 4B rev 1.4 not recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpi.gpio/+bug/1902177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902177] Re: Pi 4B rev 1.4 not recognized
It could be evaluating `/proc/device-tree/soc/ranges` incorrectly, but it looks good on line 86 in c_gpio.c from rpi.gpio_0.6.5 from example (https://www.iot-programmer.com/index.php/books/22-raspberry-pi-and-the- iot-in-c/chapters-raspberry-pi-and-the-iot-in-c/59-raspberry-pi-and-the- iot-in-c-memory-mapped-gpio?start=1). I note that your `$ cat /proc/cpuinfo` shows the expected hardware `Hardware : BCM2835` as per line 100 of c_gpio.c of rpi.gpio_0.6.5 (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/rpi.gpio/0.6.5-1ubuntu0.18.04.1/rpi.gpio_0.6.5.orig.tar.gz)... suggesting ARM1176JZF-S is on board. What I notice of as mentioned line 100 is it expects a tab between "Hardware" and the semicolon. Did you doctor your cat output in any way? Maybe the whitespace separator unexpectedly changed and it could not get the value from "/proc/device-tree/soc/ranges"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902177 Title: Pi 4B rev 1.4 not recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpi.gpio/+bug/1902177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1890892] [NEW] WSL openssh-server incorrect permissions .ssh
Public bug reported: Using Ubuntu Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) $ uname -srvmpio Linux 4.4.0-19041-Microsoft #1-Microsoft Fri Dec 06 14:06:00 PST 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux (Prestep required to add port for access to windows firewall) .ssh directory was set as 777 when 755 (minimum) is required for operation of authentication keys when trying to ssh -i /path-to-key/key user@domain. Generally poor housekeeping. <3 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: openssh-server 1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3 ProcVersionSignature: Microsoft 4.4.0-19041.1-Microsoft 4.4.35 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-19041-Microsoft x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Aug 8 08:44:02 2020 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=C.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SSHDConfig: Error: command ['pkexec', '/usr/sbin/sshd', '-T'] failed with exit code 127: Error getting authority: Error initializing authority: Could not connect: No such file or directory SourcePackage: openssh UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic uec-images -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890892 Title: WSL openssh-server incorrect permissions .ssh To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1890892/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1733075] Re: demote foolscap and rdeps to -proposed, incmpatible with twisted 17
Ok, 0.13.1 is released. At least it should fail *different* tests this time :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1733075 Title: demote foolscap and rdeps to -proposed, incmpatible with twisted 17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/datalad/+bug/1733075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1733075] Re: demote foolscap and rdeps to -proposed, incmpatible with twisted 17
Sigh, I've got some unreliable tests that fail on slower systems (I unwisely used fixed-duration delays in many places). I've pushed a new commit to make that particular test file reliable, but I've seen others fail kinda randomly. I'll see what other low-hanging test-reliability fruit there is, fix what I can today, and then push a new release tonight. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1733075 Title: demote foolscap and rdeps to -proposed, incmpatible with twisted 17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/datalad/+bug/1733075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1733075] Re: demote foolscap and rdeps to -proposed, incmpatible with twisted 17
I just released foolscap-0.13.0, which ought to fix this.. let me know if you see any problems, or if I can help with getting it into debian/ubuntu before the package gets removed. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1733075 Title: demote foolscap and rdeps to -proposed, incmpatible with twisted 17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/datalad/+bug/1733075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1733075] Re: demote foolscap and rdeps to -proposed, incmpatible with twisted 17
(upstream author here) Whoa, I didn't realize this problem was so bad. Let me see if I can find a fix.. I'll try to make a new release this weekend. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1733075 Title: demote foolscap and rdeps to -proposed, incmpatible with twisted 17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/datalad/+bug/1733075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 421802] Re: Feature Freeze Exception: Tahoe-LAFS
I've updated the foolscap sync-request (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/foolscap/+bug/419510) .. hopefully I subscribed the right people. zfec and pycryptopp are still sitting in +queue, I don't know if that impacts the process or not, or if I need to do anything to help get them past that stage. -- Feature Freeze Exception: Tahoe-LAFS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421802 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 419510] Re: please update to foolscap-0.4.2
The following is intended to make this bug into a proper "sync request" according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess Source package name: foolscap Source package version number to sync: 0.4.2+dfsg-1 (current version in karmic: 0.3.2.dfsg-2, in 'universe') Where to sync from: debian sid main debian/changelog entries between current ubuntu and debian: foolscap (0.4.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Stephan Peijnik ] * New upstream release (0.4.0) * Switched to python-support * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.8.1, no changes needed * Documentation should not end up in /usr/share/python-foolscap anymore, but /usr/share/python-foolscap/doc now. * Added dependency on python-all (>= 2.5.4-1~). * Using py_libdir in debian/rules now. * Not using hardcoded python2.5 in debian/rules anymore. [ Piotr Ożarowski ] * New upstream release (0.4.2) (Closes: #542876) * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.8.3, no changes needed -- Debian Python Modules Team Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:03:29 +0200 I've confirmed that the .dsc, .orig.tar.gz, and .diff.gz files are identical between 0.3.2.dfsg-2 (in karmic) and 0.3.2.dfsg-2 (which is still in squeeze), so there were no ubuntu-specific changes made in the existing karmic version that would need to be carried over to 0.4.2 . -- We're trying to get the new version of foolscap into karmic, because Tahoe (whose FFe was just approved: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/421802) depends upon the newer version. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help (I'm an upstream developer on both foolscap and tahoe). -- please update to foolscap-0.4.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419510 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254035] Re: easy_install will install a package that is already there
Aha, not so fast. We have two separate issues here, and neither one of them is resolved in Ubuntu: 1: python-nevow in Hardy puts the .egg-info file in the wrong place, and additionally setuptools fails to recognize that it is already installed, so 'easy_install' will redownload it. The most recent debian/sid packaging switched python-nevow to use pycentral (instead of pysupport), which puts the .egg-info file in the right place. Setuptools now does the right thing on sid. So one problem is that Hardy does not have this change from sid. This is a backporting issue. 2: python-simplejson has the same problem (setuptools fails to recognize that it is already installed, and redownloads it) on both sid and hardy. In this case, the .egg-info directory *is* on sys.path, so PJE's explanation seems to not be applicable. simplejson is packaged with python-support. For simplejson, I did some experiments, to isolate which difference between the two packages was causing the problem: * replacing the .egg-info/ directory with an .egg-info file didn't help * moving the .egg-info/ directory from /var/lib/python-support/python2.5/ to /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ *does* help My hypothesis is that the /var/lib directory is added to sys.path fairly late, perhaps by some site.py or *.pth file, and that setuptools is not looking in these directories properly. So I think that there is still a problem with setuptools, possibly related to python-support. -- easy_install will install a package that is already there https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
