[Bug 1913328] [NEW] xrandr 1.5 is outdated

2021-01-26 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: According to https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/xrandr/refs: - 1.5 is five years old - 1.5.1 is available since 18 months ago 1.5.1 introduces an interesting --filter flag that lets the user choose between bilinear and nearest. ** Affects: xrandr (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1873052] Re: Showing two cursors after login

2021-01-13 Thread Carlos Pita
Marco's workaround in #7 works for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873052 Title: Showing two cursors after login To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1873052] Re: Showing two cursors after login

2021-01-13 Thread Carlos Pita
Happens to me in up to date GG using amdgpu for xorg session with fractional scaling. The mouse pointer in gdm gets stuck at the beginning of the session. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1903582] Re: Regression: overview chopped off "out of screen"

2020-11-09 Thread Carlos Pita
You're assuming right https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to- dock/issues/1330 ** Bug watch added: github.com/micheleg/dash-to-dock/issues #1330 https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to-dock/issues/1330 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1903582] [NEW] Regression: overview chopped off "out of screen"

2020-11-09 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: See upstream report https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome- shell/-/issues/3378. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10 Package: gnome-shell 3.38.1-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-26.27-generic 5.8.14 Uname: Linux 5.8.0-26-generic x86_64 ApportVersion:

[Bug 1870736] Re: [nvidia] Screen scaling 125% gives 200%

2020-11-06 Thread Carlos Pita
@3v1n0 Running PopOS 20.10 right from the installer gets fractional scaling working fine (installed nvidia driver version is 455). What is it that you said they already packaged? Is this supposed to be fixed in Groovy? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1898904] Re: Calibre crashes at startup with AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'cancel'

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
Here https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- devel/2020-October/041237.html is a suggestion to sync from Groovy to Focal in order to fix the issue: > I checked Calibre in Groovy (version 4.99.12+dfsg+really4.23.0-1) and it works fine. As per bug report #1898904

[Bug 1901921] Re: Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
Sorry for the noise, but now I'm reading https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2020-October/041237.html and there was a suggestion there to sync but from Groovy: > I checked Calibre in Groovy (version 4.99.12+dfsg+really4.23.0-1) and it works fine. As per bug report #1898904

[Bug 1901236] Re: Getting notifications twice

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
I'm closing this since according to upstream they are the ones who should fix this (but it's blocked on a Gnome Shell issue). ** Changed in: evolution-data-server (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution-data-server/-/issues #262

[Bug 1901236] Re: Getting notifications twice

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
For future reference: Upstream report: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution-data- server/-/issues/262 Workarounds: - Disable autostart as described above, but this will cancel both Gnome Shell and e-a-n notifications. - Alternatively, set

[Bug 1901921] Re: Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
Ok, I'm marking this as invalid after having read this very detailed description of the situation: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/package-calibre-epub-books-reader/20436/11 Besides this particular comment all the thread is worth reading. ** Changed in: calibre (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Bug 1898904] Re: Calibre crashes at startup with AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'cancel'

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
Maybe a python upgrade to 3.8.5 at some point since the release of focal? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898904 Title: Calibre crashes at startup with AttributeError: 'NoneType'

[Bug 1901921] Re: Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
I had confused the upstream tracker with the Ubuntu tracker for Calibre, since both live in Launchpad, but now that I've seen the downstream report at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calibre/+bug/1898904 it seems like if this started happening recently (I vaguely remember this was

[Bug 1901921] Re: Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
** Description changed: Please sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) - See https://bugs.launchpad.net/calibre/+bug/1877180 + See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calibre/+bug/1898904 Ubuntu 20.04 LTS has shipped a beta version of calibre that is

[Bug 1898904] Re: Calibre crashes at startup with AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'cancel'

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
When this started to happen? I would be surprised if it was an update to focal (why?), but I have the feeling this was working at the beginning. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898904

[Bug 1901921] Re: Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
Is it because that would imply syncing dependencies also? I've not checked if that's the case. FWIW the workaround in comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/calibre/+bug/1877180/comments/6 works for me as far as I can see. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1901921] Re: Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
I'm surely requesting an exception here since the package shipped in focal doesn't even start, I believe you cannot go worse than that by syncing. ** Description changed: Please sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) - See

[Bug 1901921] Re: Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
See also https://askubuntu.com/questions/1285431/calibre-no-longer- working -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901921 Title: Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable

[Bug 1901921] Re: Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
Well, groovy is shipping 4.99.12+dfsg+really4.23.0-1 instead of 4.99.4+dfsg+really4.12.0-1build1: which is in focal. Both are beta releases, so probably both worth syncing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1901921] Re: Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
I know @teward, and this is probably already fixed in groovy (I've not tested that), but the request is for focal despite what the description says (see comment #1 above). It's specially important for focal since the package is non-functional as it is and focal is an LTS relase. -- You received

[Bug 1901921] Re: Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
I've reported this with the requestsync tool but: > Changelog entries since current hirsute version 4.99.12+dfsg+really4.23.0-1: seems wrong to me since my version is focal, not groovy nor hirsute. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1901921] [NEW] Sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-28 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: Please sync calibre 5.3.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971947 Ubuntu 20.04 LTS has shipped a beta version of calibre that is unable to even start. There has been a fix for five months now. Please,

[Bug 1900334] Re: [snap] Mouse pointer theme and scaling not honoured for cursor themes not included in gtk-common-themes

2020-10-23 Thread Carlos Pita
The Spotify snap has always shown a tiny mouse pointer in HiDPI screens. The issue has been discussed in https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/very-ugly- cursor-for-spotify-and-kde-snaps/17118 but the conclusion was that this should be fixed upstream (here is the upstream report that presumably nobody that

[Bug 1901236] Re: Getting notifications twice

2020-10-23 Thread Carlos Pita
** Description changed: I would like to revisit https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /evolution-data-server/+bug/1805666 For years, I've been closing both the "modern" notification popup and - the "classic" popup window at the same time, many times a day. This is - really annoying.

[Bug 1901236] Re: Getting notifications twice

2020-10-23 Thread Carlos Pita
Well, according to the XDG spec you can disable autostarting at the user level in a way that won't be overwritten by future updated: > If an application autostarts by having a .desktop file installed in the system wide autostart directory, an individual user can disable the autotomatic start of

[Bug 1901236] [NEW] Getting notifications twice

2020-10-23 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: I would like to revisit https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /evolution-data-server/+bug/1805666 For years, I've been closing both the "modern" notification popup and the "classic" popup window at the same time, many times a day. This is really annoying. The only way

[Bug 1899535] [NEW] os-prober generates incorrect entries for Arch linux

2020-10-12 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: You can see a detailed description of this issue in https://askubuntu.com/questions/628206/how-can-i-boot-into-arch-linux- using-initramfs-in-ubuntus-grub The fix suggested there by Naiky is simple and works with a little modification described in comment

[Bug 1750818] Re: Already installed deb packages not showing as installed when opened

2020-10-12 Thread Carlos Pita
I'm not seeing this issue in an up-to-date 20.04 installation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750818 Title: Already installed deb packages not showing as installed when opened To

[Bug 1897853] Re: [regression] gnome-shell stutters noticeably with kernel 5.8.0-19, but not 5.8.0-18

2020-10-05 Thread Carlos Pita
FWIW today 3.38 was released to Arch stable repo and I tested it using kernel 5.8.10 and 5.8.13. For the same governor, energy performance and gpu min freq settings, stuttering in the overview has increased a bit (HiDPI screen & 620, I think you already know that at this point). Anyway I've seen

[Bug 1897853] Re: [regression] gnome-shell stutters noticeably with kernel 5.8.0-19, but not 5.8.0-18

2020-10-05 Thread Carlos Pita
I'm not sure what are you using as energy_performance_preference but I've seen important improvements in scaling speed when using balance_performance instead of balance_power, without the need to set the governor to full performance. I'm in Arch at this moment and can't remember if Ubuntu defaults

[Bug 1890533] Re: Overview stuttering with 3K & Intel

2020-08-06 Thread Carlos Pita
> For me, only GNOME 3.38 (prerelease) is close to smooth at 4K. Is there a reasonably simple way to test this in Ubuntu? Or maybe I could look for a package in the AUR. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1890533] Re: Overview stuttering with 3K & Intel

2020-08-06 Thread Carlos Pita
> 1. Reboot, make sure you still see stuttering and then run these commands: Done > 2. Completely uninstall these extensions: They weren't installed in fact, just remaining configurations of old installations. I've removed every reference to them from my settings now. > 3. Disable 'Ubuntu

[Bug 1890533] Re: Overview stuttering with 3K & Intel

2020-08-06 Thread Carlos Pita
> Also remember to update your system because it appears to be out of date... Strange cause I manually run the GUI updater on a daily basis. But it's showing no update while I get 7 upgradeable packages from the CLI. Done, just small things, no difference. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1890533] Re: Overview stuttering with 3K & Intel

2020-08-06 Thread Carlos Pita
** Attachment added: "lspcik.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1890533/+attachment/5399149/+files/lspcik.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890533

[Bug 1890533] Re: Overview stuttering with 3K & Intel

2020-08-06 Thread Carlos Pita
** Attachment added: "journal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1890533/+attachment/5399150/+files/journal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890533

[Bug 1890533] Re: Overview stuttering with 4K & Intel

2020-08-05 Thread Carlos Pita
** Description changed: This was first described upstream in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME /gnome-shell/-/issues/2697 I'm reporting it here as requested in https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t /gnome-shell-performance-improvements-in- ubuntu-20-04/15972/38?u=memeplex + + Please don't be

[Bug 1890533] [NEW] Overview stuttering with 4K & Intel

2020-08-05 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: This was first described upstream in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME /gnome-shell/-/issues/2697 I'm reporting it here as requested in https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t /gnome-shell-performance-improvements-in- ubuntu-20-04/15972/38?u=memeplex ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease:

[Bug 1880586] [NEW] Serious regression (low FPS) in overview animation 3.36/20.024

2020-05-25 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: This is a downstream report to help track upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2697. The issue has been described at length (maybe excessively) upstream, so I'm pointing to a "sum up" comment here https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME

[Bug 1738774]

2020-04-25 Thread Carlos Pita
> Just updated to Version: 6.4.0.3 (x64) Build ID: b0a288ab3d2d4774cb44b62f04d5d28733ac6df8 > First build since tracking the blurry/poorly rendered icons on high dpi screens that I've seen the issue fixed. Well, lucky you. I'm on Ubuntu 20.04, LO 6.4.2.2 (also tested this in Arch and Fedora 32)

[Bug 1738774]

2020-04-25 Thread Carlos Pita
Created attachment 159915 Breeze SVG icons in HiDPI screen (LO 6.4.2.2 in Ubuntu 20.04/Arch/Fedora 32) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738774 Title: Pixeled icons with LibreOffice

[Bug 1837670] Re: After clicking "104 more" in the overview Nautilus opens empty

2020-04-25 Thread Carlos Pita
Seems that this has been fixed in 20.04, should I close it or leave it open for 19.10? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837670 Title: After clicking "104 more" in the overview

[Bug 1874916] [NEW] whatsapp doesn't recognize chromium snap user agent

2020-04-24 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: At some time there was the issue of Whatsapp not recognizing the user agent of Chromium, which was closed because it was the understanding that the problem should be fixed by Whatsapp and not Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-

[Bug 1872796] Re: gnome-shell animations are noticeably stuttery when the Ubuntu extensions are enabled

2020-04-24 Thread Carlos Pita
Further investigation shows that using linux-5.5 (from https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v5.5/) has a very positive impact on performance and gnome-session/Wayland becomes comparable with Arch and Fedora. At least this points to a definite cause, but it's somewhat of a sad outcome

[Bug 1872796] Re: gnome-shell animations are noticeably stuttery when the Ubuntu extensions are enabled

2020-04-24 Thread Carlos Pita
I've been doing some testing and disabling panel self refresh (PSR) on the Intel driver seems to help quite a lot with frame dropping in X11, this is a known fact for the Matebook Pro, at least for Windows. Still not perfect, still a bit of stuttering, but an improvement anyway. -- You received

[Bug 1872796] Re: gnome-shell animations are noticeably stuttery when the Ubuntu extensions are enabled

2020-04-23 Thread Carlos Pita
I'm experiencing this also but it's much worse than reported above, in all of these environments performance is behind 19.10/3.34: * gnome-session / X11 * gnome-session / Wayland * ubuntu-desktop / X11 * ubuntu-desktop / Wayland ubuntu-desktop / X11 is by far the worst combination, but in all

[Bug 1872796] Re: gnome-shell animations are noticeably stuttery when the Ubuntu extensions are enabled

2020-04-23 Thread Carlos Pita
I forgot to mention that resolution is 3000x2000, it's a hidpi screen with 2x scaling factor. Of course, that makes things harder but, as I said, it's working pretty well in Wayland 3.36 on Arch and Fedora. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1848841] Re: Chromium/Chrome/Electron look tiny in hidpi after gnome shell restart

2020-01-20 Thread Carlos Pita
** Summary changed: - Chromium/Chrome looks tiny in hidpi after gnome shell restart + Chromium/Chrome/Electron look tiny in hidpi after gnome shell restart -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1848841] Re: Chromium/Chrome looks tiny in hidpi after gnome shell restart

2020-01-18 Thread Carlos Pita
Done in https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1043494, should I also report this to Gnome Gitlab? Btw, the problem also happens with VSCode, which is not surprising given that it's an Electron based app. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1850696] Re: Regression: cannot close notifications

2019-12-03 Thread Carlos Pita
I'm not experiencing this anymore after a recent update. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850696 Title: Regression: cannot close notifications To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1834967] Re: Windows in Activities might be partially off screen

2019-11-23 Thread Carlos Pita
I've tested this in two up-to-date 19.10 installations running in very different laptops, one with hi-dpi, the other one an old standard dpi one, and both still show the issue. Both have the standard vertically expanded dock. It perplexes me as this issue status is "Fix released" since almost one

[Bug 1850696] [NEW] Regression: cannot close notifications

2019-10-30 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: Upstream reports: * https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1805 * https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1803 ** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1848841] Re: Chromium snap looks tiny in hidpi after gnome shell restart

2019-10-30 Thread Carlos Pita
Hi Olivier, sorry for the delay, I've installed Chrome from the official deb and it also happens there so it seems like a non-snap specific, upstream bug. Do you have any idea what kind of "signal" could the app be receiving when shell restarts? It's really weird that it somehow resets to 1x

[Bug 1834967] Re: Windows in Activities might be partially off screen

2019-10-27 Thread Carlos Pita
Also I agree that giving it low priority is to mischaracterise it, the bug is not specific of Ubuntu, it's a bug somewhere in Gnome shell or in Dash-to-dock that manifests when the dock is vertically stretched, as it happens to be Ubuntu default configuration. But this also happens, for example,

[Bug 1848895] [NEW] Video recorder uses up to GBs of memory in a few seconds

2019-10-19 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: This was reported upstream in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/853 and closed since it is a problem in shell and not mutter. I requested the maintainer to move it to gnome-shell tracker instead of merely closing the issue. Otherwise I will file a new ticket. It

[Bug 1848841] [NEW] Chromium snap looks tiny in hidpi after gnome shell restart

2019-10-19 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: My screen is 3000x2000. I use a scaling factor of 2x. Today I upgraded to 19.10 and chromium became a snap package. It launches at the right scaling factor, but if I restart gnome shell (Alt-F2 r) it rescales to 1x (I believe) and everything becomes absurdly tiny. Restarting

[Bug 1834967] Re: Windows in Activities might be partially off screen

2019-10-15 Thread Carlos Pita
I confirm this is still happening after fully updating a few minutes ago. It's too close to the release and gives quite a bad impression, even if it doesn't affect usability in a crucial way I would say that importance isn't Low because of its visibility. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1834967] Re: Activities overview doesn't shrink some windows adequately and they are partially off screen

2019-10-07 Thread Carlos Pita
I've tested this with latest 19.10 (updated today) using gnome-session and upstream dash-to-dock installed from gnome-software (can't remember the version now, but I installed it a few minutes ago). The problem is still there when the dock is vertically expanded to fit the screen. I've reported

[Bug 1834967] Re: Activities overview doesn't shrink some windows adequately and they are partially off screen

2019-10-05 Thread Carlos Pita
Just to be clear: I didn't mean to imply it is an Ubuntu dock bug, just that I was using that dock when it happened (btw it still happens). So I hope it wasn't moved here because of my answer alone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1834967] Re: Activities overview doesn't shrink some windows adequately and they are partially off screen

2019-09-29 Thread Carlos Pita
Hi Daniel, for me is ubuntu-dock, I've not even tested this with upstream dash-to-dock. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834967 Title: Activities overview doesn't shrink some windows

[Bug 1834967] Re: Activities overview doesn't shrink some windows adequately and they are partially off screen

2019-09-27 Thread Carlos Pita
Still happening in beta, when installing and after installation. If I move the dock to the bottom it stops happening, no matter how many windows I open. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1834967] Re: Activities overview doesn't shrink some windows adequately and they are partially off screen

2019-09-20 Thread Carlos Pita
@vanvugt in case Robert is right, could you move this to dash-to-dock launchpad? Or do you prefer me to create a new issue (and maybe another one at https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to-dock/issues)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1834967] Re: Activities overview doesn't fit the whole window in when shrinking

2019-09-18 Thread Carlos Pita
Do you think the importance of this problem is just low? It affects a very central part of the desktop in a way that is not only ugly but also hinders usability. Hopefully it's not an upstream issue and will be auto-magically fixed by an update. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1834967] Re: Activities overview doesn't fit the whole window in when shrinking

2019-09-18 Thread Carlos Pita
I don't think the title of this report is accurate. The is no "shrinking" involved. The bottom window previews in the overview are just clipped out of the screen, not shrinked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1834967] Re: Activities overview doesn't fit the whole window in when shrinking

2019-09-18 Thread Carlos Pita
See additional screenshots and comments in Ubuntu Discourse: * https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/the-gnome-3-34-migration-what-are-your-bugs/12348/27 * https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/the-gnome-3-34-migration-what-are-your-bugs/12348/29 and others below these. Is this a problem upstream? -- You

[Bug 1844529] Re: Botton windows are clipped in the overview

2019-09-18 Thread Carlos Pita
** Description changed: This is for 19.10 (Eoan). See comments https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/the-gnome-3-34-migration- what-are-your-bugs/12348/27?u=memeplex and https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/the-gnome-3-34-migration-what-are-your- - bugs/12348/29?u=memeplex in Ubuntu Discourse. +

[Bug 1844529] [NEW] Botton windows are clipped in the overview

2019-09-18 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: This is for 19.10 (Eoan). See comments https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/the-gnome-3-34-migration- what-are-your-bugs/12348/27?u=memeplex and https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/the-gnome-3-34-migration-what-are-your- bugs/12348/29?u=memeplex in Ubuntu Discourse. ** Affects:

[Bug 1842776] Re: Mismatch between package version (3.32.2) and packaged version (3.32.1)

2019-09-04 Thread Carlos Pita
Ok, I had already done that and was checking if upgrading to 3.32.2 solved https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1325, which it doesn't :( I don't know why @vladox is assuming it's fixed in 3.32.2, and I'm not sure whether to interpret Florian intervention as confirming that, but if

[Bug 1842776] Re: Mismatch between package version (3.32.2) and packaged version (3.32.1)

2019-09-04 Thread Carlos Pita
I'm not an apt expert (I've been using Arch for about 10 years before I recently switched to Ubuntu) but maybe this throws some light on the issue: ~:: dpkg -s gnome-shell Package: gnome-shell Status: install ok installed ... Version: 3.32.1-1ubuntu1~19.04.1 ~:: apt show gnome-shell Package:

[Bug 1842776] Re: Mismatch between package version (3.32.2) and packaged version (3.32.1)

2019-09-04 Thread Carlos Pita
I've an up-to-date Ubuntu installation. Also: ~:: ps `pgrep gnome-shell` PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 1618 tty2 Sl+5:48 /usr/bin/gnome-shell 1674 ?Sl 0:00 /usr/lib/gnome-shell/gnome-shell-calendar-server ~:: which gnome-shell /usr/bin/gnome-shell ~:: gnome-shell

[Bug 1842776] Re: Mismatch between package version (3.32.2) and packaged version (3.32.1)

2019-09-04 Thread Carlos Pita
I realized of the problem because of: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1325#note_596254 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues #1325 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1325 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1842776] [NEW] Mismatch between package version (3.32.2) and packaged version (3.32.1)

2019-09-04 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: Simply: ~:: gnome-shell --version GNOME Shell 3.32.1 ~:: apt info gnome-shell Package: gnome-shell Version: 3.32.2-2ubuntu1~ubuntu19.04.1 ** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1825722] Re: Anki fails to start because QWebEngineView is not defined (missing import)

2019-07-26 Thread Carlos Pita
This worked for me, thanks! Anyway, I would like to point out that this is a problem upstream and it would be nice to port the fix to Debian. I have emailed the maintainer a couple of times because of this issue but never got an answer. It would safe to consider upstream to be unmaintained at this

[Bug 1837902] [NEW] Ubuntu Software doesn't show any update description

2019-07-25 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: When Ubuntu releases an update the only information I get in Ubuntu Software is the one shown in the attached screenshot: no list of updates packages at all. Similarly, after clicking on the Update button, only a tiny progress bar is shown, it's never clear what is being

[Bug 1837902] Re: Ubuntu Software doesn't show any update description

2019-07-25 Thread Carlos Pita
** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2019-07-25 10-40-00.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1837902/+attachment/5279216/+files/Screenshot%20from%202019-07-25%2010-40-00.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1837670] [NEW] After clicking "104 more" in the overview Nautilus opens empty

2019-07-23 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: Upstream report: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/1174 If upstream they decide it's not an Ubuntu specific bug I will take care of closing this. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 1832124] Re: Right-click file on desktop > Move to Trash frequently crashes gnome-shell

2019-07-17 Thread Carlos Pita
Also happens in X11 with Ubuntu 19.04. Often moving anything in the desktop to trash restarts the shell or simply hangs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832124 Title: Right-click

[Bug 1835794] Re: Bookmarks unusable because clicks drag them

2019-07-15 Thread Carlos Pita
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835794 Title: Bookmarks unusable because clicks drag them To manage notifications

[Bug 1835794] Re: Bookmarks unusable because clicks drag them

2019-07-15 Thread Carlos Pita
As I commented upstream (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues/963#note_555977) this is probably a bug in general touchpad support because is affecting other apps and components in similar ways. I would close this or move it to some other project (maybe libinput?). -- You received this

[Bug 1835794] [NEW] Bookmarks unusable because clicks drag them

2019-07-08 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: Clicking on a bookmark starts a drag operation that you have to cancel pressing Escape. This happens both in nautilus and in the standard file dialog. It happens also when using the touchpad. Since bookmarks are an important and standard feature, having them crippled to the

[Bug 1621723] Re: Desktop (nautilus) text no longer scales to HiDPI with the rest of the system. Stays small.

2019-07-08 Thread Carlos Pita
This seems to be very old. I'm not seeing this at all in Gnome 3.32, Ubuntu 19.04, neither in mid-dpi screens (with fractional scaling or font scaling) nor in retina like screens (with 2x scaling). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1831161] Re: App-switcher icons too small with hidpi monitor and 1.25 scaling

2019-07-01 Thread Carlos Pita
@vanvugt the fix was already merged upstream. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831161 Title: App-switcher icons too small with hidpi monitor and 1.25 scaling To manage notifications

[Bug 1832792] Re: App-switcher icons too small with hidpi (3000x2000) monitor

2019-06-20 Thread Carlos Pita
There is a PR open to fix this: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome- shell/merge_requests/587 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832792 Title: App-switcher icons too small with hidpi

[Bug 1831161] Re: App-switcher icons too small with hidpi monitor and 1.25 scaling

2019-06-20 Thread Carlos Pita
There is a PR open to fix this: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome- shell/merge_requests/587 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831161 Title: App-switcher icons too small with hidpi

[Bug 1832947] Re: Icons keep selected forever until explicitly deselected

2019-06-18 Thread Carlos Pita
Sorry, I realized the screenshot might be misleading: the "carlos" icon (the one selected) is the one matching "Home" in Nautilus, the "home" icon is just a folder with that name that happens to be un my Desktop folder. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1832947] Re: Icons keep selected forever until explicitly deselected

2019-06-18 Thread Carlos Pita
Hi Sebastien: * Ubuntu 19.04 * Session: ubuntu desktop (quite pure, the dock in the screenshot has just been made to shrink but it's still the builtin one). Nevertheless, as far as I can remember, this consistently happened every time I used the desktop icons extension in the past, both in

[Bug 1832958] [NEW] Quirky preview behavior when autohide is on

2019-06-15 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: See details in my upstream report: https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to- dock/issues/963 Also reporting here because it affects configurations supported by Ubuntu. ** Affects: gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Bug 1832947] [NEW] Icons keep selected forever until explicitly deselected

2019-06-15 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: Every time you click on a desktop icon to do something (open it, open the menu context, etc) the icon gets selected and the selection won't disappear until you click elsewhere in the desktop. The behavior is against the usual expectation that the thing gets selected just to

[Bug 1819086] Re: Ubuntu 19.04: Some gnome-shell extensions no longer work since updating to gnome-shell 3.31/3.32

2019-06-15 Thread Carlos Pita
This report seems surprising to me, I never had problems using the ubuntu branch of the extension nor the upstream one in 19.04 (and I'm using it since the release). A couple of coworkers are using ubuntu 19.04 with a fully functional dock also. I also have used arch and fedora with gnome 3.32 and

[Bug 1832940] [NEW] Consider making the shift action iterate windows by default

2019-06-15 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: Currently the shift action is set to launch a new application, exactly the same than the control action. If there is more than one window for an app (say in position 1), then super+1 will open a preview to switch between them, which is nice but has some shortcomings: 1) It's

[Bug 1723117] Re: Desktop icons goes under the Dock, if the Dock is set to auto-hide.

2019-06-14 Thread Carlos Pita
I can confirm this is still happening in Ubuntu 19.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723117 Title: Desktop icons goes under the Dock, if the Dock is set to auto-hide. To manage

[Bug 1832798] [NEW] Better qt experience out of the box (suggestion)

2019-06-13 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: (I'm unsure about the right package to report this to) The qt experience out of the box is currently a mess. Short of proper Yaru integration, why not install qt5ct with consistent Ubuntu fonts and icons and Breeze by default? Every qt app will work just fine with Breeze.

[Bug 1723827] Re: App indicator icon size is too small

2019-06-13 Thread Carlos Pita
See my report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell- extension-appindicator/+bug/1832793 Indeed PANEL_ICON_SIZE is the wrong way to compute the icon size. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1832793] Re: Size is not right with hidpi (both 2x and 1x with font scaling)

2019-06-13 Thread Carlos Pita
I've reported this in github also: https://github.com/ubuntu/gnome- shell-extension-appindicator/issues/181. I'm not sure which is the better place since upstream = distro here. ** Bug watch added: github.com/ubuntu/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator/issues #181

[Bug 1832793] [NEW] Size is not right with hidpi (both 2x and 1x with font scaling)

2019-06-13 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: I've tried this in two different hidpi monitors with different scaling configurations: 1) A 1920x1080 screen with scale factor 1x and font scale factor 1.25. 2) A 3000x2000 screen with scale factor 2x. In the first one, icons are too small, I have to change:    

[Bug 1831161] Re: App-switcher icons too small with hidpi monitor and 1.25 scaling

2019-06-13 Thread Carlos Pita
I've changed `baseIconSizes` from the looking glass and I get bigger icons. This doesn't seem to be hard to fix really. Maybe the size restriction should be checked *before* scaling up 2x. Maybe bigger icons should be allowed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1832792] [NEW] App-switcher icons too small with hidpi (3000x2000) monitor

2019-06-13 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported: I've reported this upstream (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome- shell/issues/1370), but given that this is an important part of the Ubuntu desktop and that you're providing some patches for improving the X11 experience with hidpi monitors, I'm notifying about the issue

[Bug 1831476] Re: gpaste extension is broken on ubuntu 19.04 (needs update)

2019-06-11 Thread Carlos Pita
This is affecting me too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831476 Title: gpaste extension is broken on ubuntu 19.04 (needs update) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1832137] Re: The default shell theme is titled Default instead of its real name 'Yaru' or 'Adwaita'

2019-06-09 Thread Carlos Pita
Just to make it crystal clear. I now enter my Ubuntu session, go to Tweaks and get this shell themes list: (1) Default Materia Materia-compact Materia-dark Materia-dark-compact Materia-light Materia-light-compact Nevertheless, Adwaita shell theme IS installed in my computer. Hence I would like

[Bug 1832137] Re: The default shell theme is titled Default instead of its real name 'Yaru' or 'Adwaita'

2019-06-09 Thread Carlos Pita
Oh, I now see why I was not following you. I don't think the "Default" name to be a problem, quite to the contrary. What I don't like is the inability to select the other (the non-default) theme. Even if you renamed Default to Yaru, that won't make Adwaita appear. And if in a vanilla session you

[Bug 1832137] Re: Switch Adwaita/Yaru shell themes under vanilla/ubuntu gnome sessions

2019-06-09 Thread Carlos Pita
Thanks for you careful considerations, Daniel. > Because you say "there is no way to pick the other shell theme" which is simply untrue. I'm not quite following you here, what I mean is that when you are in Yaru shell theme you can't pick Adwaita shell theme (that is, the other theme in the

  1   2   >