[Bug 1916897] Re: [SRU] Center windows option has no effect

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Mantic has 1.6.2, which does not have this bug. Marking Ubuntu task as
fix-released.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916897

Title:
  [SRU] Center windows option has no effect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obconf-qt/+bug/1916897/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1916897] Re: [SRU] Center windows option has no effect

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Nguyễn, or anyone else affected,

Accepted obconf-qt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obconf-
qt/0.16.0-1ubuntu2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: obconf-qt (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

** Changed in: obconf-qt (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916897

Title:
  [SRU] Center windows option has no effect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obconf-qt/+bug/1916897/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056187] Re: fails to configure BOOTIF when using iscsi

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Alexsander, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.136ubuntu6.8 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056187

Title:
  fails to configure BOOTIF when using iscsi

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2056187/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056187] Re: fails to configure BOOTIF when using iscsi

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Alexsander, or anyone else affected,

Accepted initramfs-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.140ubuntu13.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056187

Title:
  fails to configure BOOTIF when using iscsi

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2056187/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2029473] Re: Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Nathan, or anyone else affected,

Accepted software-properties into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/0.96.20.13 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-xenial
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029473

Title:
  Backport Ubuntu Pro to Xenial

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2029473/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058035] Re: [SRU] Create directories for apt configuration files if they are absent

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Nathan, or anyone else affected,

Accepted software-properties into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/0.96.20.13 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058035

Title:
  [SRU] Create directories for apt configuration files if they are
  absent

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2058035/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2045552] Re: nullboot 0.5.0: shim 15.7-0ubuntu1 update

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nullboot into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nullboot/0.5.0-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: nullboot (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045552

Title:
  nullboot 0.5.0: shim 15.7-0ubuntu1 update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nullboot/+bug/2045552/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1989078] Re: libvirt-qemu apparmor profile doesn't allow locking of AAVMF firmware

[Chris Halse Rogers]

We now have a follow-up SRU. Removing the block-proposed tags.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989078

Title:
  libvirt-qemu apparmor profile doesn't allow locking of AAVMF firmware

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libvirt/+bug/1989078/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1989078] Re: libvirt-qemu apparmor profile doesn't allow locking of AAVMF firmware

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Paride, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libvirt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/6.0.0-0ubuntu8.18 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-focal
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

** Tags removed: block-proposed block-proposed-focal verification-needed 
verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989078

Title:
  libvirt-qemu apparmor profile doesn't allow locking of AAVMF firmware

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libvirt/+bug/1989078/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059272] Re: libvirt domain is not listed/managed after libvirt restart with messages "internal error: no monitor path" and "Failed to load config for domain"

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Mauricio, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libvirt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/6.0.0-0ubuntu8.18 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059272

Title:
  libvirt domain is not listed/managed after libvirt restart with
  messages "internal error: no monitor path" and "Failed to load config
  for domain"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/2059272/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054510] Re: Incomplete screen redraws in virtual machines running Xorg

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Yes, please make sure the flaky tests are marked as such in the
autopkgtests. SRUs are not released until either the test passes or the
package version is marked as badtest in the britney hints.

(A retry has caused it to pass on armhf)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054510

Title:
  Incomplete screen redraws in virtual machines running Xorg

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2054510/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2039017] Re: [SRU] 2.61.3

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Has anyone looked into the systemd autopkgtest regression? It doesn't
*appear* to be related, but the failing DNS test appears consistent and
is not obviously a broken test.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039017

Title:
  [SRU] 2.61.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/2039017/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058390] Re: Please remove minizip

[Chris Halse Rogers]

( https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/minizip/+publishinghistory )

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058390

Title:
  Please remove minizip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/minizip/+bug/2058390/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058390] Re: Please remove minizip

[Chris Halse Rogers]

This was actually processed by Steve in January!

** Changed in: minizip (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058390

Title:
  Please remove minizip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/minizip/+bug/2058390/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2043336] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for ceph has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043336

Title:
  [SRU] ceph 17.2.7 point release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2043336/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2049243] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for timidity has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049243

Title:
  [SRU] package timidity-daemon 2.14.0-8ubuntu1 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed timidity-daemon package post-installation
  script subprocess returned error exit status 5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/timidity/+bug/2049243/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054470] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for nbd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054470

Title:
  NBD Client Fails to Parse /etc/nbdtab Correctly on Ubuntu 22.04 and
  20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nbd/+bug/2054470/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2009495] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for smc-tools has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009495

Title:
  [Ubuntu 22.04] smc_run does not work, libsmc-preload.so cannot be
  preloaded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2009495/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2037595] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for gpgme1.0 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037595

Title:
  _gpgme_io_select breaks when more than 1024 file descriptors are open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme1.0/+bug/2037595/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2037595] Re: _gpgme_io_select breaks when more than 1024 file descriptors are open

[Chris Halse Rogers]

ubuntu@sru-focal:~$ python3
Python 3.8.10 (default, Nov 22 2023, 10:22:35)
[GCC 9.4.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import gpg
>>> c = gpg.Context()
>>> list(c.keylist())
[]
>>> fs = []
>>> for i in range(1024):
... fs.append(open('/dev/null'))
...
>>> list(c.keylist())
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "", line 1, in 
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/core.py", line 751, in keylist
key = self.op_keylist_next()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/core.py", line 1195, in 
op_keylist_next
raise excp
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/core.py", line 1190, in 
op_keylist_next
errorcheck(gpgme.gpgme_op_keylist_next(self.wrapped, ptr))
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/errors.py", line 129, in errorcheck
raise GPGMEError(retval, extradata)
gpg.errors.GPGMEError: GPGME: Too many open files
>>>

ubuntu@sru-focal:~$ sudo apt install -t focal-proposed libgpgme11
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
  libfreetype6
Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove it.
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libgpgme11
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 14 not upgraded.
Need to get 120 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-proposed/main amd64 libgpgme11 
amd64 1.13.1-7ubuntu2.2 [120 kB]
Fetched 120 kB in 1s (95.6 kB/s)
(Reading database ... 32247 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libgpgme11_1.13.1-7ubuntu2.2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgpgme11:amd64 (1.13.1-7ubuntu2.2) over (1.13.1-7ubuntu2.1) ...
Setting up libgpgme11:amd64 (1.13.1-7ubuntu2.2) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.31-0ubuntu9.14) ...

ubuntu@sru-focal:~$ python3
Python 3.8.10 (default, Nov 22 2023, 10:22:35)
[GCC 9.4.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import gpg
>>> c = gpg.Context()
>>> list(c.keylist())
[]
>>> fs = []
>>> for i in range(1024):
... fs.append(open('/dev/null'))
...
>>> list(c.keylist())
[]
>>>

** Tags removed: removal-candidate verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037595

Title:
  _gpgme_io_select breaks when more than 1024 file descriptors are open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme1.0/+bug/2037595/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2037595] Re: _gpgme_io_select breaks when more than 1024 file descriptors are open

[Chris Halse Rogers]

ubuntu@sru-jammy:~$ python3
Python 3.10.12 (main, Nov 20 2023, 15:14:05) [GCC 11.4.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import gpg
>>> c = gpg.Context()
>>> list(c.keylist())
[]
>>> fs = []
>>> for i in range(1024):
... fs.append(open('/dev/null'))
...
>>> list(c.keylist())
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "", line 1, in 
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/core.py", line 762, in keylist
key = self.op_keylist_next()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/core.py", line 1206, in 
op_keylist_next
raise excp
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/core.py", line 1201, in 
op_keylist_next
errorcheck(gpgme.gpgme_op_keylist_next(self.wrapped, ptr))
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/errors.py", line 129, in errorcheck
raise GPGMEError(retval, extradata)
gpg.errors.GPGMEError: GPGME: Too many open files
>>>
ubuntu@sru-jammy:~$ sudo apt install -t jammy-proposed libgpgme11
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libgpgme11
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 32 not upgraded.
Need to get 136 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 libgpgme11 
amd64 1.16.0-1.2ubuntu4.2 [136 kB]
Fetched 136 kB in 1s (104 kB/s)
(Reading database ... 34017 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libgpgme11_1.16.0-1.2ubuntu4.2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgpgme11:amd64 (1.16.0-1.2ubuntu4.2) over (1.16.0-1.2ubuntu4.1) ...
Setting up libgpgme11:amd64 (1.16.0-1.2ubuntu4.2) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.35-0ubuntu3.6) ...
Scanning processes...

No services need to be restarted.

No containers need to be restarted.

No user sessions are running outdated binaries.

No VM guests are running outdated hypervisor (qemu) binaries on this host.
ubuntu@sru-jammy:~$ python3
Python 3.10.12 (main, Nov 20 2023, 15:14:05) [GCC 11.4.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import gpg
>>> c = gpg.Context()
>>> list(c.keylist())
[]
>>> fs = []
>>> for i in range(1024)
  File "", line 1
for i in range(1024)
^
SyntaxError: expected ':'
>>> for i in range(1024):
... fs.append(open('/dev/null'))
...
>>> list(c.keylist())
[]
>>>

** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037595

Title:
  _gpgme_io_select breaks when more than 1024 file descriptors are open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme1.0/+bug/2037595/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881522] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for vtun has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881522

Title:
  [SRU] vtun not running on ubuntu 20.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vtun/+bug/1881522/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2026760] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for wrk has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2026760

Title:
  [SRU] wrk fails to run

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wrk/+bug/2026760/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2051921] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for linux-firmware-
mediatek-genio has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report.  In the event that you encounter a regression using the package
from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug
report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051921

Title:
  Update WiFi/BT firmware as per MediaTek's request

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware-mediatek-genio/+bug/2051921/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2049262] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for nfs-utils has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049262

Title:
  mount.nfs: fix version negotiation laddering with parameters '-t nfs4'
  or '-o vers=4'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2049262/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1998789] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for keystone has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998789

Title:
  [SRU] PooledLDAPHandler.result3 does not release pool connection back
  when an exception is raised

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1998789/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2055081] Re: NoCloud SMBIOS seed broken in 23.4

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello James, or anyone else affected,

Accepted cloud-init into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/23.4.4-0ubuntu0~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055081

Title:
  NoCloud SMBIOS seed broken in 23.4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2055081/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2055081] Please test proposed package

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello James, or anyone else affected,

Accepted cloud-init into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/23.4.4-0ubuntu0~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055081

Title:
  NoCloud SMBIOS seed broken in 23.4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2055081/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2055081] Re: NoCloud SMBIOS seed broken in 23.4

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello James, or anyone else affected,

Accepted cloud-init into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/23.4.4-0ubuntu0~23.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic

** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055081

Title:
  NoCloud SMBIOS seed broken in 23.4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2055081/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1981807] Re: qt5-network openssl3 armhf does not support tls1.3

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The patch looks reasonable (assuming that it doesn't change ABI, which
seems to be the case). Could you be able to update the bug with the
necessary SRU information (the
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template can help
here)?

Particularly, the [Test Plan] and [Where problems might occur] parts are
important. You've got most of a test-plan there already (but we should
have some tests of existing packages to check we don't have a regression
and make sure ABI hasn't been broken). I can help there, but you
probably have better insight into this code and where it might go wrong
than me :). If you'd like help, give me a ping (RAOF in #ubuntu-
release:libera.chat).

** Changed in: qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981807

Title:
  qt5-network openssl3 armhf does not support tls1.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1981807/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1977701] Please test proposed package

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Alex, or anyone else affected,

Accepted intel-microcode into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-
microcode/3.20220510.0ubuntu0.18.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977701

Title:
  Update to latest upstream release 20220510 / IPU 2022.1 to fix
  multiple security vulnerabilities

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/+bug/1977701/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1977701] Re: Update to latest upstream release 20220510 / IPU 2022.1 to fix multiple security vulnerabilities

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Alex, or anyone else affected,

Accepted intel-microcode into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-
microcode/3.20220510.0ubuntu0.20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977701

Title:
  Update to latest upstream release 20220510 / IPU 2022.1 to fix
  multiple security vulnerabilities

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/+bug/1977701/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1977701] Please test proposed package

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Alex, or anyone else affected,

Accepted intel-microcode into impish-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-
microcode/3.20220510.0ubuntu0.21.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977701

Title:
  Update to latest upstream release 20220510 / IPU 2022.1 to fix
  multiple security vulnerabilities

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/+bug/1977701/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1977701] Re: Update to latest upstream release 20220510 / IPU 2022.1 to fix multiple security vulnerabilities

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Alex, or anyone else affected,

Accepted intel-microcode into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-
microcode/3.20220510.0ubuntu0.22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

** Tags added: verification-needed-impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977701

Title:
  Update to latest upstream release 20220510 / IPU 2022.1 to fix
  multiple security vulnerabilities

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/+bug/1977701/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967814] Re: Ubuntu 20.04.3 - ilzlnx3g1 - virtio-scsi devs on KVM guest having miscompares on disktests when there is a failed path.

[Chris Halse Rogers]

I've accepted this, and I agree that this is a good candidate for
testing in proposed for longer than 7 days; I'll do so after at least 14
days, so double the normal soak time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967814

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 - ilzlnx3g1 - virtio-scsi devs on KVM guest having
  miscompares on disktests when there is a failed path.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1967814/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967814] Re: Ubuntu 20.04.3 - ilzlnx3g1 - virtio-scsi devs on KVM guest having miscompares on disktests when there is a failed path.

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,

Accepted qemu into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:4.2-3ubuntu6.22
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967814

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 - ilzlnx3g1 - virtio-scsi devs on KVM guest having
  miscompares on disktests when there is a failed path.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1967814/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1974456] Re: regression: apt.postint fails if never previously configured

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello David, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.9 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974456

Title:
  regression: apt.postint fails if never previously configured

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1974456/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1970943] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for pkcs11-helper has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970943

Title:
  OpenVPN connection fails with smartcard provided private key; please
  update pkcs11-helper

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pkcs11-helper/+bug/1970943/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1974428] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for network-manager has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974428

Title:
  Update to the current 1.36 stable version

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1974428/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1969939] Re: puppet 5 package incompatible with ruby 3 / ubuntu 22.04

[Chris Halse Rogers]

As an SRU team member, it's unclear to me whether the errors reported in
this verification are introduced by this update or are merely existing
problems that the code now hits because it's getting further.

It's also not clear to me what the effect of these errors is - if these
are just harmless warnings printed, that's ok, but if they are exposing
real problems that's an issue. Even more if they're exposing problems
that might hit users that are not already broken by this bug.

Can we please get an analysis of what - if anything - is broken here?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969939

Title:
  puppet 5 package incompatible with ruby 3 / ubuntu 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puppet/+bug/1969939/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1972722] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk4 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972722

Title:
  Include gtk4 changes needed for mutter 42.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk4/+bug/1972722/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1973219] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk4 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973219

Title:
  Update gtk4 to 4.6.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk4/+bug/1973219/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1973091] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for libusb-1.0 has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973091

Title:
  Ubuntu 22.04: libusb-1.0.25 breaks libinklevel and ink

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libusb-1.0/+bug/1973091/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1873923] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for freeradius has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873923

Title:
  freeradius with freeradius-python3 fails to start out of the box

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeradius/+bug/1873923/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1874578] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell-extension-
ubuntu-dock has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report.  In the event that you encounter a regression using the package
from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug
report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874578

Title:
  Dock has very long load time when show-mounts is enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dash-to-dock/+bug/1874578/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1913775] Re: Copy from Firefox Wayland fails to be pasted anywhere else

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Yeah, ok.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913775

Title:
  Copy from Firefox Wayland fails to be pasted anywhere else

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/1913775/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1913775] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk+3.0 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913775

Title:
  Copy from Firefox Wayland fails to be pasted anywhere else

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/1913775/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1949572] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell-extension-
ubuntu-dock has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report.  In the event that you encounter a regression using the package
from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug
report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949572

Title:
  Shell freeze after right click on the app in the dock

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator/+bug/1949572/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947445] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell-extension-
ubuntu-dock has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report.  In the event that you encounter a regression using the package
from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug
report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947445

Title:
  Click actions "previews" and "minimize-or-previews" are broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dash-to-dock/+bug/1947445/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1949352] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell-extension-
ubuntu-dock has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report.  In the event that you encounter a regression using the package
from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug
report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949352

Title:
  Removable drives are not auto-mounted after screen lock/unlock

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock/+bug/1949352/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951599] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell-extension-
ubuntu-dock has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report.  In the event that you encounter a regression using the package
from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug
report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951599

Title:
  gnome-shell logs errors when ejecting SD card

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1951599/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1970658] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for zenity has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970658

Title:
  Update zenity to 3.42.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zenity/+bug/1970658/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959047] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for lxd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959047

Title:
  systemd ignores RootDirectory option in .service units

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1959047/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959375] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for shadow has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959375

Title:
  [SRU] Please support group manipulation with "extrausers"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1959375/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959375] Re: [SRU] Please support group manipulation with "extrausers"

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Yeeah, ok.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959375

Title:
  [SRU] Please support group manipulation with "extrausers"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1959375/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1969455] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubiquity has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969455

Title:
  Install Ubuntu logo needs updating

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1969455/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1892825] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892825

Title:
  update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1892825/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1918035] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918035

Title:
  ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1918035/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928508] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928508

Title:
  Performance regression on memcpy() calls for AMD Zen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1928508/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951032] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951032

Title:
  AArch64: Backport memcpy improvements

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1951032/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1962225] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962225

Title:
  preinst check that kernel revision < 255 now does more harm than good

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1962225/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951033] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951033

Title:
  20.04 SRU

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cross-toolchain-base/+bug/1951033/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1915878] Re: RM sl-modem hardware not available

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Do these steps need to be taken in any particular order? Does the
removal of the ubuntu-drivers-common plugin need to happen before
removing sl-modem so as to prevent breakage?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915878

Title:
  RM sl-modem hardware not available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sl-modem/+bug/1915878/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1969984] Re: [SRU] Kubuntu Plymouth Theme Shows Badly on Multi-Screen

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,

Accepted kubuntu-settings into jammy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-
settings/1:22.04.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: kubuntu-settings (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969984

Title:
  [SRU] Kubuntu Plymouth Theme Shows Badly on Multi-Screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-settings/+bug/1969984/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1969984] Re: [SRU] Kubuntu Plymouth Theme Shows Badly on Multi-Screen

[Chris Halse Rogers]

To what extent is this a minimal change to fix the issue? I'm unfamiliar
with Plymouth scripting, but wouldn't it be simpler to fix the existing
theme than to wholesale replace it?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969984

Title:
  [SRU] Kubuntu Plymouth Theme Shows Badly on Multi-Screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-settings/+bug/1969984/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1955413] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for containerd has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955413

Title:
  Update to containerd 1.5.9

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1955413/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1955413] Re: Update to containerd 1.5.9

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Verifying this as per bug #1960449. This should probably have been a
duplicate of that bug.

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal 
verification-needed-impish
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal 
verification-done-impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955413

Title:
  Update to containerd 1.5.9

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1955413/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960449] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for containerd has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960449

Title:
  Backport container stack in Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1960449/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899248] Re: mysql server crashes during install/update: Error: Unable to shut down server with process id X

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Someone should look at the focal arm64 FTBFS. It's been recently retried
and failed with SIGKILL, suggesting OOM, so it probably needs more than
just a no-thought hitting of the retry button.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899248

Title:
  mysql server crashes during install/update: Error: Unable to shut down
  server with process id X

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1899248/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959757] Re: [SRU] etcd FTBFS on Focal

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Is there anyone (maybe on the Server team) who has experience with etcd?
This still looks like a worthwhile SRU, but I'm hesitant to do it
without a plan for testing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959757

Title:
  [SRU] etcd FTBFS on Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/etcd/+bug/1959757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961127] Re: New upstream microreleases 10.20, 12.10, 13.6 and 14.2

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,

Accepted postgresql-12 into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-12/12.10-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: postgresql-12 (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961127

Title:
  New upstream microreleases 10.20, 12.10, 13.6 and 14.2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-10/+bug/1961127/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927100] Re: Slow file dialogs, open and save

[Chris Halse Rogers]

I've accepted this into -proposed on the basis that it'll make it
possible for you to verify, and it's easy to reject if it turns out you
can't verify it its easy to remove from proposed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927100

Title:
  Slow file dialogs, open and save

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1927100/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927100] Re: Slow file dialogs, open and save

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello sam, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gvfs into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/1.44.1-1ubuntu1.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927100

Title:
  Slow file dialogs, open and save

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1927100/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for horizon has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960449] Please test proposed package

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted containerd into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/1.5.9-0ubuntu1~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960449

Title:
  Backport container stack in Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1960449/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1955413] Re: Update to containerd 1.5.9

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Marcus, or anyone else affected,

Accepted containerd into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/1.5.9-0ubuntu1~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: containerd (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955413

Title:
  Update to containerd 1.5.9

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1955413/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960449] Please test proposed package

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted docker.io into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/20.10.12-0ubuntu2~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: containerd (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960449

Title:
  Backport container stack in Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1960449/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960449] Re: Backport container stack in Jammy

[Chris Halse Rogers]

So, I'm a little confused about the
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DockerUpdates policy here, specifically when it
states “The aim is to backport the .1 release of a major version…” and
the upload here is for runc 1.1.0. Is the claim here that 1.1.0 vs 1.0.1
is not a major version release? Is the policy outdated?

The others look fine.

** Changed in: docker.io (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960449

Title:
  Backport container stack in Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1960449/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960449] Re: Backport container stack in Jammy

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted docker.io into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/20.10.12-0ubuntu2~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: docker.io (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960449

Title:
  Backport container stack in Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1960449/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1955413] Re: Update to containerd 1.5.9

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Marcus, or anyone else affected,

Accepted containerd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/1.5.9-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: containerd (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955413

Title:
  Update to containerd 1.5.9

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1955413/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960449] Re: Backport container stack in Jammy

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted containerd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/1.5.9-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: containerd (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960449

Title:
  Backport container stack in Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1960449/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964747] Re: [Jammy][regression] u-d-c default to use 470 instead of 510

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-drivers-common into impish-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/1:0.9.2.4~0.21.10.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964747

Title:
  [Jammy][regression] u-d-c default to use 470 instead of 510

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1964747/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964747] Re: [Jammy][regression] u-d-c default to use 470 instead of 510

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-drivers-common into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/1:0.9.0~0.20.04.7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964747

Title:
  [Jammy][regression] u-d-c default to use 470 instead of 510

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1964747/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958620] Re: [Dell XPS 15 9575] Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hm. That commit has too many dependencies to cherry-pick (or even
cherry-pick a small series) without significant conflicts. It might be
still possible to *understand* the patch and write an equivalent for
5.15.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958620

Title:
  [Dell XPS 15 9575] Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1958620/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958620] Re: [Dell XPS 15 9575] Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Thanks for that bisect.

Annoyingly, that commit doesn't cherry-pick cleanly onto 5.15, but I'll
see if I can munge it up to test.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958620

Title:
  [Dell XPS 15 9575] Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1958620/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958620] Re: [Dell XPS 15 9575] Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Nope. It looked like a good candidate, but isn't the fix.

5.17.1 fails, drm-tip succeeds, so the fix is somewhere between v5.17
and drm-tip. I'm (slowly) bisecting to find the commit that fixes it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958620

Title:
  [Dell XPS 15 9575] Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1958620/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958620] Re: [Dell XPS 15 9575] Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

[Chris Halse Rogers]

I suspect this may have been fixed by
9ce5884e5139037445d0efcf37aeba21008011ad; I'm building an Ubuntu kernel
with that cherry-picked to test.

Hm. Although that seems to have been included in 5.16, and I *thought*
I'd verified that 5.16 exhibited the bug?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958620

Title:
  [Dell XPS 15 9575] Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1958620/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958620] Re: [Dell XPS 15 9575] Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Confirmed, 6d7a793aabf31d7ba2b16fc13a94cc is bad, it's predecessor is
good.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958620

Title:
  [Dell XPS 15 9575] Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1958620/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958620] Re: Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Further investigation:
Affects:
1) 5.13.19 does not suffer from this bug
2) The Ubuntu 5.15 kernels, and mainline 5.16 and 5.17 kernels *do* suffer from 
this bug.

Also of note: this only occurs the *first* time KMS tries to come up on
the panel, and *only* if there is not a second monitor plugged in.
Having a second monitor plugged in at boot results in a successful boot,
*plugging in* a second monitor after triggering this bug results in
*both* displays  working fine, and *removing* a second monitor leaves
the laptop panel working.

It looks like maybe a bug has been introduced in framebuffer allocation?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958620

Title:
  Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1958620/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1966085] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966085

Title:
  cloud-init status --wait never returns if datasource not found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1966085/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1966106] Re: Please remove php-doctrine-bundle source and binary from jammy

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Removing packages from jammy:
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy amd64
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy arm64
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy armhf
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy i386
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy ppc64el
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy riscv64
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy s390x
Comment: FTBFS with test failures, blocks migration (LP: #1966106)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

Removing packages from jammy-proposed:
php-doctrine-bundle 2.3.2-1ubuntu1 in jammy
Comment: FTBFS with test failures, blocks migration (LP: #1966106)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: php-doctrine-bundle (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966106

Title:
  Please remove php-doctrine-bundle source and binary from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-doctrine-bundle/+bug/1966106/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965791] Update Released

[Chris Halse Rogers]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for tzdata has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965791

Title:
  Update tzdata to version 2022a

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1965791/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1952763] Re: [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Corey, or anyone else affected,

Accepted manila into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/manila/1:13.0.0-0ubuntu2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: manila (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952763

Title:
  [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was
  denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1952763/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1942789] Re: On-demand and RTD3 need to be separated

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nvidia-prime into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-
prime/0.8.16~0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: nvidia-prime (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942789

Title:
  On-demand and RTD3 need to be separated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1942789/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1942788] Re: Nvidia doesn't support RTD3 on non-laptops

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nvidia-prime into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-
prime/0.8.16~0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: nvidia-prime (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-focal
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942788

Title:
  Nvidia doesn't support RTD3 on non-laptops

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1942788/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946476] Re: New on-demand default causes RTD3 never to be enabled

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nvidia-prime into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-
prime/0.8.16~0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: nvidia-prime (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946476

Title:
  New on-demand default causes RTD3 never to be enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946476/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965520] Re: /usr/bin/prime-select:BrokenPipeError:/usr/bin/prime-select@374:enable_profile:_disable_nvidia:_update_initramfs

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nvidia-prime into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-
prime/0.8.16~0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: nvidia-prime (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965520

Title:
  /usr/bin/prime-select:BrokenPipeError:/usr/bin/prime-
  select@374:enable_profile:_disable_nvidia:_update_initramfs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-prime/+bug/1965520/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1942307] Re: ubiquity uses performance mode for nvidia driver

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nvidia-prime into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-
prime/0.8.16~0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: nvidia-prime (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942307

Title:
  ubiquity uses performance mode for nvidia driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1942307/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1952763] Re: [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Dropping my comments from #ubuntu-release in here for posterity:

RAOF: Oh! I think I see where I'm wrong. /etc/manila/policy.json isn't
shipped in the package, it's /usr/share/manila-common/manila.conf which
is then munged into /etc/manila/policy.json by pkgos_write_new_conf in
the postinst, so it's not a dpkg conffile and so you don't have all that
nice machinery available.

RAOF: So, in summary: the package in impish-proposed fixes fresh
installs of manila, leaves upgrades broken, and unbreaking upgrades is
not trivial.

RAOF: Based on that understanding I'm happy to accept what's in the
impish queue as an SRU. You're going to need to fix it in the openstack
charm anyway, though, so if you don't want that SRU to go through I'm
also happy to reject it ;)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952763

Title:
  [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was
  denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1952763/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1962277] Re: To support Synaptics fp device

[Chris Halse Rogers]

Why does this remove PID 0xE7: synaptics-add-new-PID-0x100-and-remove-
PID-0xE7

It seems that this is removing some device support. Why?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962277

Title:
  To support Synaptics fp device

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1962277/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs