[Bug 1883112] Re: rbd-target-api crashes with python TypeError
I didn't run into the same issues with verifying as in comment #11 because my test deployment doesn't have TLS configured, and by having "api_secure = False" in the /etc/ceph/iscsi-gateway.cfg file, the problematic werkzeug codepath is bypassed, which allows this verification to be performed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883112 Title: rbd-target-api crashes with python TypeError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph-iscsi/+bug/1883112/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1883112] Re: rbd-target-api crashes with python TypeError
The model used to verify the above looks like: Model ControllerCloud/Region Version SLA Timestamp rbd-mirror icey-serverstack serverstack/serverstack 2.9.29 unsupported 16:34:08Z App Version Status Scale Charm ChannelRev Exposed Message ceph-iscsi active 2 ceph-iscsi 1 no Unit is ready ceph-mon16.2.7 active 3 ceph-moncandidate 71 no Unit is ready and clustered ceph-osd16.2.7 active 3 ceph-osdcandidate 511 no Unit is ready (1 OSD) Unit Workload Agent Machine Public address Ports Message ceph-iscsi/0 activeidle 010.5.1.220 Unit is ready ceph-iscsi/1* activeidle 110.5.1.10 Unit is ready ceph-mon/0 activeidle 210.5.1.205 Unit is ready and clustered ceph-mon/1 activeidle 310.5.0.166 Unit is ready and clustered ceph-mon/2*activeidle 410.5.1.50 Unit is ready and clustered ceph-osd/0*activeidle 510.5.1.149 Unit is ready (1 OSD) ceph-osd/1 activeidle 610.5.1.210 Unit is ready (1 OSD) ceph-osd/2 activeidle 710.5.2.178 Unit is ready (1 OSD) Machine StateDNS Inst id Series AZ Message 0started 10.5.1.220 a48a6a91-8d18-41af-86fb-0fb12c75cc40 impish nova ACTIVE 1started 10.5.1.10 1e786e43-119c-42eb-b95d-bdc5aa37d8e7 impish nova ACTIVE 2started 10.5.1.205 c60362a7-fe77-4267-87e7-02bfcdf68ace impish nova ACTIVE 3started 10.5.0.166 bad1f0ac-896e-45d1-bc53-67caf48fecf7 impish nova ACTIVE 4started 10.5.1.50 cd432ac9-3442-497f-83e0-5816d6c4be07 impish nova ACTIVE 5started 10.5.1.149 220e20cc-11dd-4152-adb2-e2a7cf8b5caf impish nova ACTIVE 6started 10.5.1.210 05921fb6-1e97-40ca-9b89-a03efd5b8af3 impish nova ACTIVE 7started 10.5.2.178 1d968bfc-97bf-491d-9778-76cc2fe2e1cc impish nova ACTIVE -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883112 Title: rbd-target-api crashes with python TypeError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph-iscsi/+bug/1883112/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1883112] Re: rbd-target-api crashes with python TypeError
I've performed verification on impish with the reproducer steps and
confirmed that the proposed fix resolves this issue.
ubuntu@juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0:~$ apt-cache policy ceph-iscsi
ceph-iscsi:
Installed: 3.4-1ubuntu1.1
Candidate: 3.4-1ubuntu1.1
Version table:
*** 3.4-1ubuntu1.1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish-proposed/universe amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
3.4-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish/universe amd64
Packages
ubuntu@juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
ubuntu@juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0:~$ sudo systemctl stop rbd-target-api
ubuntu@juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0:~$ sudo ceph -n client.ceph-iscsi --conf
/etc/ceph/iscsi/ceph.conf osd blacklist add $(hostname --all-ip-addresses | awk
'{print $1}'):0/1
sudo ceph -n client.ceph-iscsi --conf /etc/ceph/iscsi/ceph.conf osd blacklist
add $(hostname --all-ip-addresses | awk '{print $1}'):0/2
sudo ceph -n client.ceph-iscsi --conf /etc/ceph/iscsi/ceph.conf osd blacklist ls
blocklisting 10.5.1.220:0/1 until 2022-06-02T17:28:46.213863+ (3600 sec)
blocklisting 10.5.1.220:0/2 until 2022-06-02T17:28:47.402322+ (3600 sec)
10.5.1.220:0/2 2022-06-02T17:28:47.402322+
10.5.1.220:0/1 2022-06-02T17:28:46.213863+
listed 2 entries
ubuntu@juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0:~$ sudo /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/rbd-target-api
ubuntu@juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0:~$ sudo systemctl start rbd-target-api
ubuntu@juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0:~$ sudo systemctl status rbd-target-api
● rbd-target-api.service - Ceph iscsi target configuration API
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/rbd-target-api.service; enabled;
vendor preset: enabled)
Active: active (running) since Thu 2022-06-02 16:29:20 UTC; 7s ago
Main PID: 8385 (rbd-target-api)
Tasks: 26 (limit: 2338)
Memory: 39.4M
CPU: 1.096s
CGroup: /system.slice/rbd-target-api.service
└─8385 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/rbd-target-api
Jun 02 16:29:21 juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0 rbd-target-api[8385]: Processing osd
blacklist entries for this node
Jun 02 16:29:21 juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0 rbd-target-api[8385]: Checking for
config object changes every 1s
Jun 02 16:29:22 juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0 rbd-target-api[8385]: Reading the
configuration object to update local LIO configuration
Jun 02 16:29:22 juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0 rbd-target-api[8385]: Configuration
does not have an entry for this
host(juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0.project.serverstack) - nothing to define to LIO
Jun 02 16:29:22 juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0 rbd-target-api[8385]: * Serving Flask
app "rbd-target-api" (lazy loading)
Jun 02 16:29:22 juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0 rbd-target-api[8385]: * Environment:
production
Jun 02 16:29:22 juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0 rbd-target-api[8385]:WARNING: This
is a development server. Do not use it in a production deployment.
Jun 02 16:29:22 juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0 rbd-target-api[8385]:Use a
production WSGI server instead.
Jun 02 16:29:22 juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0 rbd-target-api[8385]: * Debug mode:
off
Jun 02 16:29:22 juju-2e9148-rbd-mirror-0 rbd-target-api[8385]: * Running on
http://[::]:5000/ (Press CTRL+C to quit)
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 21.10
Release:21.10
Codename: impish
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-impish
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-impish
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883112
Title:
rbd-target-api crashes with python TypeError
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph-iscsi/+bug/1883112/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971960] Re: [FTBFS] python-xmlsec fails to build on s390x
I can confirm that this now builds on all architectures (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python- xmlsec/1.3.12-1ubuntu0.22.04.1) as well as being newly installable on s390x: $ apt-cache policy python3-xmlsec python3-xmlsec: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1.3.12-1ubuntu0.22.04.1 Version table: 1.3.12-1ubuntu0.22.04.1 500 500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports jammy-proposed/universe s390x Packages ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971960 Title: [FTBFS] python-xmlsec fails to build on s390x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-xmlsec/+bug/1971960/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971960] Re: [FTBFS] python-xmlsec fails to build on s390x
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ python3-xmlsec isn't available to installce on s390x on Jammy.
+
As can be seen in this build log
(https://launchpadlibrarian.net/599963344/buildlog_ubuntu-
focal-s390x.python-xmlsec_1.3.12-1build1~cloud0_BUILDING.txt.gz), the
s390x build fails testing with a lot of errors matching:
___ ERROR at teardown of
TestSignContext.test_set_enabled_key_data_bad_args
self =
def test_set_enabled_key_data_bad_args(self):
ctx = xmlsec.SignatureContext()
> ctx.key = xmlsec.Key.from_file(self.path('rsakey.pem'),
format=consts.KeyDataFormatPem)
E xmlsec.Error: (1, 'cannot read key')
tests/test_ds.py:326: Error
- Captured stderr call
-
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
___ ERROR at teardown of TestSignContext.test_set_enabled_key_data_bad_list
- Digging into it, I see that module seems to be loosing track of the
- passed in key file's argument, leading to the key being none, and unable
- to be read.
+ [Test Plan]
+
+ The unit tests for the build should pass on all architectures, including
+ big-endian (S390X).
+
+ [Where problems could occur]
+
+ Problems could occur in key-loading, given that the issue is identified
+ as specifically relating to code that's loading private keys from the
+ filesystem. This specific test is what caused the build failures on
+ s390x so should be fairly low risk.
+
+ [Other Info]
+
+ The specific issue
[Bug 1971960] Re: [FTBFS] python-xmlsec fails to build on s390x
A fix for this has been uploaded to Kinetic in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-xmlsec/1.3.12-1ubuntu1 ** Also affects: python-xmlsec (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: python-xmlsec (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971960 Title: [FTBFS] python-xmlsec fails to build on s390x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-xmlsec/+bug/1971960/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1971960] [NEW] [FTBFS] python-xmlsec fails to build on s390x
Public bug reported:
As can be seen in this build log
(https://launchpadlibrarian.net/599963344/buildlog_ubuntu-
focal-s390x.python-xmlsec_1.3.12-1build1~cloud0_BUILDING.txt.gz), the
s390x build fails testing with a lot of errors matching:
___ ERROR at teardown of
TestSignContext.test_set_enabled_key_data_bad_args
self =
def test_set_enabled_key_data_bad_args(self):
ctx = xmlsec.SignatureContext()
> ctx.key = xmlsec.Key.from_file(self.path('rsakey.pem'),
> format=consts.KeyDataFormatPem)
E xmlsec.Error: (1, 'cannot read key')
tests/test_ds.py:326: Error
- Captured stderr call -
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:file=app.c:line=330:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=17:invalid
format:format=131072
func=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoad:file=app.c:line=175:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecOpenSSLAppKeyLoadBIO:error=1:xmlsec
library function
failed:filename=/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.8/build/tests/data/rsakey.pem
___ ERROR at teardown of TestSignContext.test_set_enabled_key_data_bad_list
Digging into it, I see that module seems to be loosing track of the
passed in key file's argument, leading to the key being none, and unable
to be read.
** Affects: python-xmlsec (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971960
Title:
[FTBFS] python-xmlsec fails to build on s390x
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-xmlsec/+bug/1971960/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1919261] Re: Upgrading Ceph from 14.2.11-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~cloud4 to 15.2.8-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 fails when ceph-mds is installed
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 --- ceph (15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0) bionic-ussuri; urgency=medium . * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. . ceph (15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium . [ James Page ] * d/control: Correct Breaks/Replaces versioning between -common and -mds to resolve issues with upgrades (LP: #1919261). . [ Chris MacNaughton ] * New upstream release (LP: #1964802). * Dropped patches in latest relese: - d/p/rgw_clear_buckets_before_calling_list_buckets.patch - d/p/bug1955345.patch * d/p/misc-32-bit-fixes.patch: Refreshed. * d/rules, d/ceph-osd.install: Update ceph-osd-smartctl to ceph-smartctl. ** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919261 Title: Upgrading Ceph from 14.2.11-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~cloud4 to 15.2.8-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 fails when ceph-mds is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1919261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1919261] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ceph has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919261 Title: Upgrading Ceph from 14.2.11-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~cloud4 to 15.2.8-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 fails when ceph-mds is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1919261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1964802] Re: [SRU] ceph 15.2.16
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 --- ceph (15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0) bionic-ussuri; urgency=medium . * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. . ceph (15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium . [ James Page ] * d/control: Correct Breaks/Replaces versioning between -common and -mds to resolve issues with upgrades (LP: #1919261). . [ Chris MacNaughton ] * New upstream release (LP: #1964802). * Dropped patches in latest relese: - d/p/rgw_clear_buckets_before_calling_list_buckets.patch - d/p/bug1955345.patch * d/p/misc-32-bit-fixes.patch: Refreshed. * d/rules, d/ceph-osd.install: Update ceph-osd-smartctl to ceph-smartctl. ** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964802 Title: [SRU] ceph 15.2.16 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1964802/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1964802] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ceph has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964802 Title: [SRU] ceph 15.2.16 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1964802/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1919261] Re: Upgrading Ceph from 14.2.11-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~cloud4 to 15.2.8-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 fails when ceph-mds is installed
I see the same thing as Tyler with the latest package in the Train UCA as well. In addition, I can confirm that an upgrade from the UCA Train version of ceph-mds to bionic-ussuri (proposed, verified with: 15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0) or to focal (proposed, verified with: 15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) works as expected, and the upgrade progresses correctly. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal verification-ussuri-needed ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal verification-ussuri-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919261 Title: Upgrading Ceph from 14.2.11-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~cloud4 to 15.2.8-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 fails when ceph-mds is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1919261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1964802] Re: [SRU] ceph 15.2.16
Verification was performed on Bionic with ussuri-proposed: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 811.7575 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 1150.5210 sec. The 1 failure is a known failure with testing: https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 Package tested: ceph-common: Installed: 15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 Candidate: 15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 Version table: *** 15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 500 500 http://ubuntu-cloud.archive.canonical.com/ubuntu bionic-proposed/ussuri/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Tags removed: verification-ussuri-needed ** Tags added: verification-ussuri-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964802 Title: [SRU] ceph 15.2.16 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1964802/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1964802] Re: [SRU] ceph 15.2.16
Verification was performed on Focal with proposed: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 638.2440 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 923.7139 sec. The 1 failure is a known failure with testing: https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 Package tested: ceph-common: Installed: 15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 Candidate: 15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 Version table: *** 15.2.16-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Bug watch added: github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues #53 https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964802 Title: [SRU] ceph 15.2.16 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1964802/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1919261] Please test proposed package
Hello Fabio, or anyone else affected, Accepted ceph into ussuri-proposed. The package will build now and be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed repository: sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:ussuri-proposed sudo apt-get update Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-ussuri-needed to verification-ussuri-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-ussuri-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-ussuri-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919261 Title: Upgrading Ceph from 14.2.11-0ubuntu0.19.10.1~cloud4 to 15.2.8-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 fails when ceph-mds is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1919261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1964802] Please test proposed package
Hello James, or anyone else affected, Accepted ceph into ussuri-proposed. The package will build now and be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed repository: sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:ussuri-proposed sudo apt-get update Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-ussuri-needed to verification-ussuri-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-ussuri-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-ussuri-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964802 Title: [SRU] ceph 15.2.16 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1964802/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953599] Re: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7
** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953599 Title: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1953599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953599] Re: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 16.2.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1~cloud2
---
ceph (16.2.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1~cloud2) focal; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release (LP: #1953599).
* d/control,ceph-{osd,base}.install,rules: Update name of smartctl
sudoers file and move to ceph-base package to allow use from both
mon and osd services.
* d/*: Fold in UCA backport patch as new uploads with target the
Wallaby UCA directly.
** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953599
Title:
[SRU] ceph 16.2.7
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1953599/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953599] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ceph has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953599 Title: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1953599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953599] Re: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7
Verification as performed on Focal with the Wallaby proposed cloud archive: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 828.8984 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 1168.7214 sec. The single test failure is a known failure and unrelated to Ceph: https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Tags removed: verification-wallaby-needed ** Tags added: verification-wallaby-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953599 Title: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1953599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953599] Re: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7
This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 16.2.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1~cloud1
---
ceph (16.2.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1~cloud1) focal-xena; urgency=medium
* New upstream release (LP: #1953599).
* d/control,ceph-{osd,base}.install,rules: Update name of smartctl
sudoers file and move to ceph-base package to allow use from both
mon and osd services.
-- James Page Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:19:05 +
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953599
Title:
[SRU] ceph 16.2.7
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1953599/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953599] Re: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7
Verification as performed on Focal with the Xena proposed cloud archive: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 1183.9832 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 915.1055 sec. The single test failure is a known failure and unrelated to Ceph: https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Tags removed: verification-xena-needed ** Tags added: verification-xena-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953599 Title: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1953599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953599] Re: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7
Marking this invalid in Yoga as there's a new upstream release that has superseded it (Quincy) ** Changed in: cloud-archive/yoga Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: cloud-archive/yoga Status: Fix Released => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953599 Title: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1953599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953599] Re: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7
Verification was performed against Impish-proposed. == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 666.5669 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 898.8899 sec. == Worker Balance == - Worker 0 (26 tests) => 0:10:57.384805 - Worker 1 (27 tests) => 0:09:56.632364 - Worker 2 (24 tests) => 0:08:22.273936 - Worker 3 (22 tests) => 0:09:16.151311 The single test failure is a known failure and unrelated to Ceph: https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 The version of Ceph tested: ceph-common: Installed: 16.2.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 Candidate: 16.2.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 Version table: *** 16.2.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 16.2.6-0ubuntu1 500 500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish/main amd64 Packages ** Bug watch added: github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues #53 https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-impish ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953599 Title: [SRU] ceph 16.2.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1953599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1964322] Re: Module 'devicehealth' has failed: PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN macro must be defined for '#' formats
@sarcher: Have you restarted all of the Ceph daemons? The packages take pains to not restart the services when performing a package upgrade and intermittent failure like this sounds like it works when talking to newer daemons and doesn't when talking to older ones. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964322 Title: Module 'devicehealth' has failed: PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN macro must be defined for '#' formats To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1964322/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1965870] Re: [SRU] Ceph 15.2.16
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964802 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964802 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964802 [SRU] ceph 15.2.16 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965870 Title: [SRU] Ceph 15.2.16 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1965870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1965870] [NEW] [SRU] Ceph 15.2.16
Public bug reported: [Impact] The update contains the following package updates: * ceph 15.2.16 Notable changes: 15.2.15: - The default value of osd_client_message_cap has been set to 256, to provide better flow control by limiting maximum number of in-flight client requests. -A new ceph-erasure-code-tool has been added to help manually recover an object from a damaged PG. 15.2.16: - Fix in the read lease logic to prevent PGs from going into WAIT state after OSD restart. - Several bug fixes in BlueStore, including a fix for object listing bug, which could cause stat mismatch scrub errors. [Test Case] The following SRU process was followed: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStackUpdates In order to avoid regression of existing users, the OpenStack team will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required before the proposed packages can be let into -updates. The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark ‘verification-done’ until this has happened. [Regression Potential] In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the aforementioned tests are attached to this bug. ** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965870 Title: [SRU] Ceph 15.2.16 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1965870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1960899] Re: nfs-ganesha doesn't ship the ganesha-rados-grace binary target in Focal
I've setup and tested a highly-available Ganesha cluster using focal- proposed: # apt-cache policy nfs-ganesha nfs-ganesha: Installed: 3.0.3-0ubuntu3.2 Candidate: 3.0.3-0ubuntu3.2 Version table: *** 3.0.3-0ubuntu3.2 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3.0.3-0ubuntu3.1 500 500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 3.0.3-0ubuntu3 500 500 http://nova.clouds.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages And have confirmed that the ganesha-rados-grace binary functions as expected: # ganesha-rados-grace --userid ceph-nfs --pool ceph-nfs dump cur=4 rec=0 == juju-298dfa-zaza-401128674c2c-5 juju-298dfa-zaza-401128674c2c-6 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960899 Title: nfs-ganesha doesn't ship the ganesha-rados-grace binary target in Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1960899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956994] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cinder has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. The verification of the Stable Release Update for designate has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. The verification of the Stable Release Update for horizon has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. The verification of the Stable Release Update for neutron has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. The verification of the Stable Release Update for nova has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. The verification of the Stable Release Update for octavia has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. ** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956994 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956994] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
The package versions in this test are: $ juju ssh cinder/0 apt-cache policy cinder-common cinder-common: Installed: 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu2 $ juju ssh designate/0 apt-cache policy designate-common designate-common: Installed: 1:10.0.2-0ubuntu1 $ juju ssh openstack-dashboard/0 apt-cache policy openstack-dashboard openstack-dashboard: Installed: 3:18.3.5-0ubuntu1 $ juju ssh neutron-api/0 apt-cache policy neutron-common neutron-common: Installed: 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu1 $ juju ssh nova-compute/0 apt-cache policy nova-common nova-common: Installed: 2:21.2.4-0ubuntu1 $ juju ssh octavia/0 apt-cache policy octavia-common octavia-common: Installed: 6.2.2-0ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956994 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956754] Re: [SRU] openvswitch 2.13.5
Verification was performed on Focal with proposed enabled: = Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 989.4504 sec. - Passed: 90 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 0 Sum of execute time for each test: 1019.7829 sec. Verification was performed on Bionic with the Ussuri proposed cloud archive: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 1146.9384 sec. - Passed: 90 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 0 Sum of execute time for each test: 1708.5307 sec. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal verification-ussuri-needed ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal verification-ussuri-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956754 Title: [SRU] openvswitch 2.13.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956752] Re: [SRU] openvswitch 2.15.2
Validation has been performed on Focal with with Wallaby proposed cloud archive == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 1213.5834 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 1179.3411 sec. The 1 failure is a known failure with testing: https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Bug watch added: github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues #53 https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-wallaby-needed ** Tags added: verification-done verification-wallaby-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956752 Title: [SRU] openvswitch 2.15.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956752/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1960899] Re: nfs-ganesha doesn't ship the ganesha-rados-grace binary target in Focal
Attached is a debdiff to enable this binary package in Focal, and is a straight backport of the target from Jammy. ** Description changed: While the source is all present, the debian/control file doesn't build the binary package for ganesha-rados-grace. [Impact] - It is impossible to setup HA Ganesha with Ceph as a backed on Focal + It is impossible to setup HA Ganesha with Ceph as a backed on Focal. The + correct way to setup the rados cluster backend for Ganesha is to use: + + ganesha-rados-grace add `hostname` + + to add the named host to the cluster, which will allow all units to + share cluster state. [Test Plan] A new charm has been developed that configures nfs-ganesha (https://github.com/chrismacnaughton/charm-ceph-nfs) and will be used to verify that the cluster setup works correctly. it also functionally validates that shares are created correctly and are accessible. [Where problems could occur] Problems could occur around the binary target being fairly new in this release; however, the only change required is enabling that new binary target which is included in the version shipped in Focal. After verification has been confirmed, we can be fairly confident that the new binary target works as expected and doesn't interract badly with other parts. ** Patch added: "rados-grace.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1960899/+attachment/5562437/+files/rados-grace.debdiff ** Patch removed: "rados-grace.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1960899/+attachment/5562411/+files/rados-grace.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960899 Title: nfs-ganesha doesn't ship the ganesha-rados-grace binary target in Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1960899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1960899] Re: nfs-ganesha doesn't ship the ganesha-rados-grace binary target in Focal
** Description changed: While the source is all present, the debian/control file doesn't build the binary package for ganesha-rados-grace. + + [Impact] + + It is impossible to setup HA Ganesha with Ceph as a backed on Focal + + [Test Plan] + + A new charm has been developed that configures nfs-ganesha + (https://github.com/chrismacnaughton/charm-ceph-nfs) and will be used to + verify that the cluster setup works correctly. it also functionally + validates that shares are created correctly and are accessible. + + [Where problems could occur] + + Problems could occur around the binary target being fairly new in this + release; however, the only change required is enabling that new binary + target which is included in the version shipped in Focal. + + After verification has been confirmed, we can be fairly confident that + the new binary target works as expected and doesn't interract badly with + other parts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960899 Title: nfs-ganesha doesn't ship the ganesha-rados-grace binary target in Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1960899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1960899] Re: nfs-ganesha doesn't ship the ganesha-rados-grace binary target in Focal
Attached is a debdiff for the Focal version of nfs-ganesha ** Patch added: "rados-grace.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1960899/+attachment/5562411/+files/rados-grace.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960899 Title: nfs-ganesha doesn't ship the ganesha-rados-grace binary target in Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1960899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956994] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
Verification was performed on Bionic with the Ussuri proposed cloud archive: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 1146.9384 sec. - Passed: 90 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 0 Sum of execute time for each test: 1708.5307 sec. ** Tags removed: verification-ussuri-needed ** Tags added: verification-ussuri-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956994 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956994] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
Verification was performed on Focal with proposed enabled: = Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 989.4504 sec. - Passed: 90 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 0 Sum of execute time for each test: 1019.7829 sec. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956994 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956991] Re: [SRU] Xena stable releases
Verification was performed on Impish with proposed enabled: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 724.8252 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 911.8466 sec. The 1 failure is a known failure with testing: https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-impish ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956991 Title: [SRU] Xena stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956991] Re: [SRU] Xena stable releases
Verification was performed on Focal with the Xena cloud-archive: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 1038.2390 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 1242.5642 sec. The 1 failure is a known failure with testing: https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Bug watch added: github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues #53 https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Tags removed: verification-xena-needed ** Tags added: verification-xena-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956991 Title: [SRU] Xena stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1960899] [NEW] nfs-ganesha doesn't ship the ganesha-rados-grace binary target in Focal
Public bug reported: While the source is all present, the debian/control file doesn't build the binary package for ganesha-rados-grace. ** Affects: nfs-ganesha (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: nfs-ganesha (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nfs-ganesha (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nfs-ganesha (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960899 Title: nfs-ganesha doesn't ship the ganesha-rados-grace binary target in Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1960899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1927750] Re: [SRU] FTBFS nfs-ganesha fails to build from source on Ubuntu Groovy (gcc-10)
** Changed in: nfs-ganesha (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927750 Title: [SRU] FTBFS nfs-ganesha fails to build from source on Ubuntu Groovy (gcc-10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1927750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1959401] [NEW] Ganesha doesn't support Rados recovery backend on Focal
Public bug reported: Ganesha 3.0.3 has support for using Rados to manage a cluster recovery backend. The binary package that enables this functionality isn't currently built for Focal: ganesha-rados-grace ** Affects: nfs-ganesha (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: nfs-ganesha (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nfs-ganesha (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nfs-ganesha (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959401 Title: Ganesha doesn't support Rados recovery backend on Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1959401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956992] Re: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases
** No longer affects: octavia (Ubuntu Hirsute) ** No longer affects: octavia (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: designate (Ubuntu Hirsute) ** No longer affects: designate (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956992 Title: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956991] Re: [SRU] Xena stable releases
** No longer affects: nova (Ubuntu) ** Description changed: [Impact] This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. The update contains the following package updates: -* neutron 19.1.0 -* nova 22.2.1 + * neutron 19.1.0 + * octavia 9.0.1 [Test Case] The following SRU process was followed: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required before the proposed packages can be let into -updates. The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark ‘verification-done’ until this has happened. [Regression Potential] In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the aforementioned tests are attached to this bug. [Discussion] ** No longer affects: nova (Ubuntu Impish) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956991 Title: [SRU] Xena stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956994] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
** Changed in: cloud-archive Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: designate (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: octavia (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956994 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956991] Re: [SRU] Xena stable releases
** Changed in: cloud-archive Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956991 Title: [SRU] Xena stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956992] Re: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases
** Changed in: cloud-archive Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: designate (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: octavia (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956992 Title: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956992] [NEW] [SRU] Wallaby stable releases
Public bug reported: [Impact] This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. The update contains the following package updates: * designate 12.0.1 * octavia 8.0.1 [Test Case] The following SRU process was followed: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required before the proposed packages can be let into -updates. The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark ‘verification-done’ until this has happened. [Regression Potential] In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the aforementioned tests are attached to this bug. [Discussion] ** Affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cloud-archive/wallaby Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: designate (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: octavia (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: designate (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: octavia (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/wallaby Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: designate (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: octavia (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: designate (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: octavia (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956992 Title: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956993] [NEW] [SRU] Victoria stable releases
Public bug reported: [Impact] This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. The update contains the following package updates: * designate 11.0.1 [Test Case] The following SRU process was followed: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required before the proposed packages can be let into -updates. The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark ‘verification-done’ until this has happened. [Regression Potential] In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the aforementioned tests are attached to this bug. [Discussion] ** Affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cloud-archive/victoria Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: octavia (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: cloud-archive/victoria Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956993 Title: [SRU] Victoria stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956993/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956994] [NEW] [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
Public bug reported: [Impact] This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. The update contains the following package updates: * cinder 16.4.2 * designate 10.0.2 * horizon 18.3.5 * neutron 16.4.2 * nova 21.2.4 * octavia 6.2.2 [Test Case] The following SRU process was followed: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required before the proposed packages can be let into -updates. The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark ‘verification-done’ until this has happened. [Regression Potential] In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the aforementioned tests are attached to this bug. [Discussion] ** Affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cloud-archive/ussuri Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cinder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: designate (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: horizon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: neutron (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: octavia (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cinder (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: designate (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: horizon (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: neutron (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: octavia (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: designate (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: horizon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: octavia (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/ussuri Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: horizon (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: designate (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: octavia (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956994 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956991] [NEW] [SRU] Xena stable releases
Public bug reported: [Impact] This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. The update contains the following package updates: * neutron 19.1.0 * nova 22.2.1 [Test Case] The following SRU process was followed: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required before the proposed packages can be let into -updates. The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark ‘verification-done’ until this has happened. [Regression Potential] In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the aforementioned tests are attached to this bug. [Discussion] ** Affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cloud-archive/xena Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: neutron (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: neutron (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/xena Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956991 Title: [SRU] Xena stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946211] Please test proposed package
Hello nikhil, or anyone else affected, Accepted ceph into ussuri-proposed. The package will build now and be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed repository: sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:ussuri-proposed sudo apt-get update Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-ussuri-needed to verification-ussuri-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-ussuri-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-ussuri-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946211 Title: [SRU] "radosgw-admin bucket limit check" has duplicate entries if bucket count exceeds 1000 (max_entries) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1946211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953339] Re: Failure to install ceph client on ARM64
16.2.x versions of Ceph only have shipped with version of Ubuntu greater than Focal, but it looks like these packages are intended for Bionic? Where are they coming from? ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953339 Title: Failure to install ceph client on ARM64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1953339/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948914] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
Verification was performed on Bionic with the proposed Ussuri cloud archive: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 433.5430 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 638.4261 sec. The 1 failure is a known failure: https://github.com/openstack- charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Tags removed: verification-ussuri-needed ** Tags added: verification-ussuri-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948914 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948914] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
Verification was performed on Focal with proposed: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 865.6446 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 1177.4692 sec. The 1 failure is a known failure: https://github.com/openstack- charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Bug watch added: github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues #53 https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948914 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948912] Re: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases
Verification was performed on Focal with the proposed Wallaby cloud archive: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 852.5326 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 1211.5313 sec. The 1 failure is a known failure: https://github.com/openstack- charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Tags removed: verification-wallaby-needed ** Tags added: verification-wallaby-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948912 Title: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948912] Re: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases
Verification was performed on Hirsute: == Totals == Ran: 99 tests in 614.5823 sec. - Passed: 89 - Skipped: 9 - Expected Fail: 0 - Unexpected Success: 0 - Failed: 1 Sum of execute time for each test: 875.7848 sec. The 1 failure is a known failure: https://github.com/openstack- charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Bug watch added: github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues #53 https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-tester/issues/53 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948912 Title: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948914] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
** Tags added: verification-ussuri-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948914 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948914] Please test proposed package
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected, Accepted nova into ussuri-proposed. The package will build now and be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed repository: sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:ussuri-proposed sudo apt-get update Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-ussuri-needed to verification-ussuri-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-ussuri-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948914 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948914] Please test proposed package
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected, Accepted glance into ussuri-proposed. The package will build now and be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed repository: sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:ussuri-proposed sudo apt-get update Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-ussuri-needed to verification-ussuri-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-ussuri-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948914 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948914] Please test proposed package
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected, Accepted cinder into ussuri-proposed. The package will build now and be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed repository: sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:ussuri-proposed sudo apt-get update Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-ussuri-needed to verification-ussuri-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-ussuri-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-ussuri-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948914 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948912] Please test proposed package
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected, Accepted nova into wallaby-proposed. The package will build now and be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed repository: sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:wallaby-proposed sudo apt-get update Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-wallaby-needed to verification-wallaby-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-wallaby-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948912 Title: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948912] Please test proposed package
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected, Accepted glance into wallaby-proposed. The package will build now and be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed repository: sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:wallaby-proposed sudo apt-get update Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-wallaby-needed to verification-wallaby-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-wallaby-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-wallaby-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948912 Title: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1951129] Re: [MIR] python-autopage
** Description changed: - TBC + [Availability] + + The package python-autopage is already in Ubuntu universe. + The package python-autopage build for the architectures it is designed to work on. + It currently builds and works for architectures: AMD64 + Link to package [[https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-autopage]] + + [Rationale] + + - The package python-autopage is required in Ubuntu main for python-cliff + - The package python-autopage will not generally be useful for a large part of +our user base, but is important/helpful still because it is an OpenStack requirement + - The package python-autopage is a new runtime dependency of package python-cliff + that we already support + + [Security] + + No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + + - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries + - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` + + - Package does not install services + - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024) + + [Quality assurance - function/usage] + + - The package works well right after install + + [Quality assurance - maintenance] + + - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu and has not too many + and long term critical bugs open + - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support + + [Quality assurance - testing] + + - The package does not run a test at build time + + - The package does not run an autopkgtest + + - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now + + [Quality assurance - packaging] + + - debian/watch is present and works + + - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors + - The only lintian warnings or errors: + - E: python-autopage changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file unstable + - W: python-autopage source: newer-standards-version 4.6.0 (current is 4.5.1) + - Lintian overrides are not present + + - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. + - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies + + - The package will not be installed by default + + - Packaging and build is easy, link to d/rules + [[https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/python- + autopage/-/blob/debian/0.4.0-2/debian/rules]] + + [UI standards] + + - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) + + [Dependencies] + + - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main + + [Standards compliance] + + - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy + + [Maintenance/Owner] + + - Owning Team will be OpenStack + + - This does not use static builds + - This does not use vendored code + + [Background information] + + The Package description explains the package well + Upstream Name is autopage + Link to upstream project https://github.com/zaneb/autopage ** Changed in: python-autopage (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951129 Title: [MIR] python-autopage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-autopage/+bug/1951129/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945761] Re: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0
After doing some other work to resolve different build failures, I was able to build Ceph successfully with the following: sbuild ../ceph*dsc -c chroot:jammy-amd64 --arch=amd64 --dist=jammy --nolog -A --extra-repository='deb [trusted=yes] http://ppa.launchpad.net/schopin/openssl-3.0.0/ubuntu jammy main' --extra-repository-key=/home/ubuntu/packaging/openssl3.asc --extra- repository='deb [trusted=yes] http://ppa.launchpad.net/schopin/foundation-openssl3/ubuntu jammy main' The key is that it took both of the following PPAs to get all of the dependencies sorted: - schopin/openssl-3.0.0 - schopin/foundation-openssl3 ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945761 Title: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1945761/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949957] Re: Installation fails with dpkg error
** Also affects: luarocks (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949957 Title: Installation fails with dpkg error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luarocks/+bug/1949957/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949957] [NEW] Installation fails with dpkg error
Public bug reported: Error: Cannot access repository at /root/.luarocks/lib/luarocks/rocks-5.3 dpkg: error processing package luarocks (--configure): installed luarocks package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: luarocks (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #996781 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996781 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949957 Title: Installation fails with dpkg error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luarocks/+bug/1949957/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949957] Re: Installation fails with dpkg error
I can't seem to add a bug-watch on the upstream debian bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996781 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949957 Title: Installation fails with dpkg error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luarocks/+bug/1949957/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949957] Re: Installation fails with dpkg error
** Patch added: "luarocks.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luarocks/+bug/1949957/+attachment/5538393/+files/luarocks.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949957 Title: Installation fails with dpkg error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luarocks/+bug/1949957/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949778] [NEW] unittest2 doesn't work on python3.10
Public bug reported: Since Python 3.3, using or importing ABCs from 'collections' instead of 'collections.abc' has been deprecated, and it's finally removed in python 3.10. Because unittest2 relies on these collections in it's compatibility helpers, it fails to run on 3.10 ** Affects: unittest2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949778 Title: unittest2 doesn't work on python3.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unittest2/+bug/1949778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1907228] Re: dnspython is outdated, causes other packages fail in tests
It looks like OpenStack's upper-constraints has now updated to > 2 [1] 1: https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/2c681dd1c8a9a7e89d4b80b946a9e2e8c1280b03/upper- constraints.txt#L561 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907228 Title: dnspython is outdated, causes other packages fail in tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnspython/+bug/1907228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915734] Re: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8
This bug was fixed in the package magnum - 10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2~cloud0 --- magnum (10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2~cloud0) bionic-ussuri; urgency=medium . * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. . magnum (10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2) focal; urgency=medium . * d/control: Update VCS paths for move to lp:~ubuntu-openstack-dev. * d/p/mysql8-support.patch: Picked from upstream stable/ussuri review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/781510 for mysql 8 support (LP: #1915734). * d/rules: Add OS_STDOUT_CAPTURE/OS_STDERR_CAPTURE to test execution inline with upstream. ** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915734 Title: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1915734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915734] Re: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8
This bug was fixed in the package magnum - 11.0.0-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 --- magnum (11.0.0-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0) focal-victoria; urgency=medium . * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. . magnum (11.0.0-0ubuntu1.1) groovy; urgency=medium . [ Corey Bryant ] * d/gbp.conf: Create stable/victoria branch. . [ Chris MacNaughton ] * d/p/mysql8-support.patch: Picked from upstream stable/victoria review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum/+/777910 for mysql 8 support (LP: #1915734). ** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915734 Title: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1915734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915734] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for magnum has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915734 Title: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1915734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915734] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for magnum has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915734 Title: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1915734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940456] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data exists
Also, Victoria isn't carrying Ceph in the UCA, so I'm marking that task as invalid ** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940456 Title: [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data exists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940456/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940456] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data exists
I've confirmed that James is correct re: 15.2.14, it was fix-released in Focal (& Ussuri) via bug 1940902 ** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940456 Title: [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data exists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940456/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915734] Re: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8
I have deployed magnum on focal with the proposed Victoria cloud archive and confirmed that it can setup successfully on mysql8. ** Tags removed: verification-victoria-needed ** Tags added: verification-victoria-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915734 Title: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1915734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915734] Re: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8
I have deployed magnum on bionic with the proposed Ussuri cloud archive and confirmed that it can setup on percona-cluster as well ** Tags removed: verification-ussuri-needed ** Tags added: verification-ussuri-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915734 Title: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1915734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1944666] Please test proposed package
Hello Hemanth, or anyone else affected, Accepted octavia into victoria-proposed. The package will build now and be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed repository: sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:victoria-proposed sudo apt-get update Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-victoria-needed to verification-victoria-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-victoria-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-victoria-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944666 Title: listener provisioning status in ERROR when port is 1025 and allowed_cidr is explicitly set to 0.0.0.0/0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1944666/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915734] Re: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8
I have deployed Magnum from Focal-proposed and confirmed that it can run it's db-manage successfully on mysql8. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915734 Title: The db-sync command fails with MySQL 8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1915734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 945177] Re: not lintian clean
This was resolved in the Victoria cycle on the Nova package ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945177 Title: not lintian clean To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/945177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1888395] Re: live migration of a vm using the single port binding work flow is broken in train as a result of the introduction of sriov live migration
This bug was fixed in the package nova - 2:20.6.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0 --- nova (2:20.6.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0) bionic-train; urgency=medium . * New stable point release for OpenStack Train (LP: #1935031). . nova (2:20.6.0-0ubuntu1~cloud1) bionic-train; urgency=medium . * d/p/restore-migrate-data-vifs(-tests).patch: Cherry-picked from upstream stable/train to fix live migration of VM's using the single port binding workflow (LP: #1888395). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888395 Title: live migration of a vm using the single port binding work flow is broken in train as a result of the introduction of sriov live migration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1888395/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1888395] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nova has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888395 Title: live migration of a vm using the single port binding work flow is broken in train as a result of the introduction of sriov live migration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1888395/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948934] [NEW] Backported test requires newer ddt than included in test-requirements.txt
Public bug reported: test-requirements.txt requires ddt>=1.2.1 ; however, 17.2.0 includes a test backport (cinder/tests/unit/volume/flows/test_create_volume_flow.py) that uses a module name that doesn't exist in DDT until 1.4.0 (https://github.com/datadriventests/ddt/commit/6bf51b5d7887049eda580932643a5408ca0f5e3f) Running the unit tests results in the following traceback: = Failures during discovery = --- import errors --- Failed to import test module: cinder.tests.unit.volume.flows.test_create_volume_flow Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.8/unittest/loader.py", line 436, in _find_test_path module = self._get_module_from_name(name) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/unittest/loader.py", line 377, in _get_module_from_name __import__(name) File "/build/cinder-17.2.0/cinder/tests/unit/volume/flows/test_create_volume_flow.py", line 1258, in @ddt.ddt(testNameFormat=ddt.TestNameFormat.INDEX_ONLY) AttributeError: module 'ddt' has no attribute 'TestNameFormat' ** Affects: cinder Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cloud-archive/victoria Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: cinder (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/victoria Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: test-requirements.txt requires ddt>=1.2.1 ; however, 17.2.0 includes a test backport (cinder/tests/unit/volume/flows/test_create_volume_flow.py) that uses a module name that doesn't exist in DDT until 1.4.0 (https://github.com/datadriventests/ddt/commit/6bf51b5d7887049eda580932643a5408ca0f5e3f) + + Running the unit tests results in the following traceback: + + = + Failures during discovery + = + --- import errors --- + Failed to import test module: cinder.tests.unit.volume.flows.test_create_volume_flow + Traceback (most recent call last): + File "/usr/lib/python3.8/unittest/loader.py", line 436, in _find_test_path + module = self._get_module_from_name(name) + File "/usr/lib/python3.8/unittest/loader.py", line 377, in _get_module_from_name + __import__(name) + File "/build/cinder-17.2.0/cinder/tests/unit/volume/flows/test_create_volume_flow.py", line 1258, in + @ddt.ddt(testNameFormat=ddt.TestNameFormat.INDEX_ONLY) + AttributeError: module 'ddt' has no attribute 'TestNameFormat' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948934 Title:
[Bug 1948912] [NEW] [SRU] Wallaby stable releases
Public bug reported: [Impact] This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. The update contains the following package updates: * glance 22.1.0 * nova 23.1.0 [Test Case] The following SRU process was followed: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required before the proposed packages can be let into -updates. The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark ‘verification-done’ until this has happened. [Regression Potential] In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the aforementioned tests are attached to this bug. [Discussion] ** Affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: cloud-archive/wallaby Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: glance (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: glance (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/wallaby Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: glance (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: glance (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cloud-archive Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: glance (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948912 Title: [SRU] Wallaby stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948914] [NEW] [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
Public bug reported: [Impact] This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our users have access to these improvements. The update contains the following package updates: * cinder 16.4.1 * glance 20.2.0 * nova 21.2.3 [Test Case] The following SRU process was followed: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required before the proposed packages can be let into -updates. The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark ‘verification-done’ until this has happened. [Regression Potential] In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the aforementioned tests are attached to this bug. [Discussion] ** Affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cloud-archive/ussuri Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cinder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: glance (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cinder (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: glance (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cloud-archive/ussuri Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: glance (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: glance (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948914 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1948914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904730] Re: neutron-agent-sriov fails to create port
This does seem to be available into Victoria-proposed as well so I'm marking this as needing verification for Victoria, as well as being fix- committed ** Also affects: cloud-archive/victoria Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-victoria -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904730 Title: neutron-agent-sriov fails to create port To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1904730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1923668] Please test proposed package
Hello Michael, or anyone else affected, Accepted openvswitch into rocky-proposed. The package will build now and be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed repository: sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:rocky-proposed sudo apt-get update Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-rocky-needed to verification-rocky-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-rocky-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: cloud-archive/rocky Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-rocky-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923668 Title: Upgrade from Queens to Rocky results in dead ovs-vswitchd services To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-neutron-openvswitch/+bug/1923668/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1923668] Re: Upgrade from Queens to Rocky results in dead ovs-vswitchd services
** Changed in: cloud-archive/rocky Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris MacNaughton (chris.macnaughton) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923668 Title: Upgrade from Queens to Rocky results in dead ovs-vswitchd services To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-neutron-openvswitch/+bug/1923668/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934912] Re: Router update fails for ports with allowed_address_pairs containg IP range in CIDR notation
This bug was fixed in the package neutron - 2:16.4.1-0ubuntu2~cloud0 --- neutron (2:16.4.1-0ubuntu2~cloud0) bionic-ussuri; urgency=medium . * New upstream release for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. . neutron (2:16.4.1-0ubuntu2) focal; urgency=medium . * d/p/lp1934912-set-arp-entries-only-for-single-ip.patch: Cherry-pick upstream patch (LP: #1934912) . neutron (2:16.4.1-0ubuntu1) focal; urgency=medium . [ Corey Bryant ] * d/p/revert-rely-on-worker-count-for-hashring-caching.patch: Dropped. Fixed upstream by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/800679 in the 16.4.1 stable release. . [ Chris MacNaughton ] * New stable point release for OpenStack Ussuri (LP: #1943712). * d/p/provide-integer-argument-to-arping.patch: Removed after inclusion in upstream release. ** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934912 Title: Router update fails for ports with allowed_address_pairs containg IP range in CIDR notation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1934912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934912] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for neutron has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934912 Title: Router update fails for ports with allowed_address_pairs containg IP range in CIDR notation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1934912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943712] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
This bug was fixed in the package swift - 2.25.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0 --- swift (2.25.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0) bionic-ussuri; urgency=medium . * New upstream release for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. . swift (2.25.2-0ubuntu1) focal; urgency=medium . * New stable point release for OpenStack Ussuri (LP: #1943712). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943712 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1943712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943712] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for swift has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943712 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1943712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943712] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
This bug was fixed in the package placement - 3.0.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0 --- placement (3.0.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0) bionic-ussuri; urgency=medium . * New upstream release for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. . placement (3.0.1-0ubuntu1) focal; urgency=medium . * d/control: Update VCS paths for move to lp:~ubuntu-openstack-dev. * New stable point release for OpenStack Ussuri (LP: #1943712). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943712 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1943712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943712] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for placement has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943712 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1943712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943712] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
This bug was fixed in the package neutron - 2:16.4.1-0ubuntu2~cloud0 --- neutron (2:16.4.1-0ubuntu2~cloud0) bionic-ussuri; urgency=medium . * New upstream release for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. . neutron (2:16.4.1-0ubuntu2) focal; urgency=medium . * d/p/lp1934912-set-arp-entries-only-for-single-ip.patch: Cherry-pick upstream patch (LP: #1934912) . neutron (2:16.4.1-0ubuntu1) focal; urgency=medium . [ Corey Bryant ] * d/p/revert-rely-on-worker-count-for-hashring-caching.patch: Dropped. Fixed upstream by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/800679 in the 16.4.1 stable release. . [ Chris MacNaughton ] * New stable point release for OpenStack Ussuri (LP: #1943712). * d/p/provide-integer-argument-to-arping.patch: Removed after inclusion in upstream release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943712 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1943712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943712] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for neutron has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943712 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1943712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943712] Re: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases
This bug was fixed in the package keystone - 2:17.0.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0 --- keystone (2:17.0.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0) bionic-ussuri; urgency=medium . * New upstream release for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. . keystone (2:17.0.1-0ubuntu1) focal; urgency=medium . * d/control: Update VCS paths for move to lp:~ubuntu-openstack-dev. * d/watch: Add trailing slash to URL. * New stable point release for OpenStack Ussuri (LP: #1943712). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943712 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1943712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943712] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for keystone has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943712 Title: [SRU] Ussuri stable releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1943712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
