[Bug 1867092] Re: Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter

2020-09-26 Thread Chris Williamson
The day before yesterday, I got the error as originally reported, except
I was running Kubuntu 20.04, got the updates available prompt, opened
Discover, updated shim and shim-signed, waited for both the regular
software update and grub update to finish, and then restarted.

I posted a question on Ask Ubuntu, then found a CentOS bug with a fix I
was able to adapt to my own situation and answer my own question. If
you're a bug fixer, read the first note on the CentOS bug; if you've got
this same problem, read the Ask Ubuntu question and answer:

https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15522#c33203
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1277828/how-do-i-fix-broken-boot-after-shim-update

** Bug watch added: bugs.centos.org/ #15522
   https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15522

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867092

Title:
  Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1867092/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1867402] Re: [snap] Icons in file picker are corrupted

2020-07-30 Thread Chris Williamson
Olivier: No, rm -rf ~/snap/chromium/common/.cache does not fix the
problem. Icons still look to me exactly the same as in my screenshot in
comment #21.

Also I just noticed where Fernando said in comment #13 that he thought
probably not many people open the file chooser in a browser. I regularly
print/save pages as PDFs and save files to non-default locations, so I
see the file chooser often, though these icons are not interfering with
any of my tasks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867402

Title:
  [snap] Icons in file picker are corrupted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1867402/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1867402] Re: [snap] Icons in file picker are corrupted

2020-07-09 Thread Chris Williamson
I have this same problem. I'm running Kubuntu 20.04 with Chromium snap
revision 1213.

** Attachment added: "Screenshot_20200709_073623.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1867402/+attachment/5391040/+files/Screenshot_20200709_073623.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867402

Title:
  [snap] Icons in file picker are corrupted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1867402/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864365] Re: [snap] Dialog font missing

2020-07-09 Thread Chris Williamson
Olivier:

I am running revision 1213 on Kubuntu 20.04. Removing
~/snap/chromium/common/.cache fixed this issue for me, and it has not
returned after multiple restarts nor after I installed the font as
described in comment #11.

Before I removed the .cache directory, my file dialogs did look very
much like the screenshot Steven posted in comment #1, with rectangles
instead of letters. But now that the letters are back, I notice that
many of the icons are garbled, which is different from Steven's
screenshot. So for sure at least the icon part is a different issue, and
I will look to see if anyone else has posted it, or else I'll post it as
a new bug.

I am now assuming that my font problem was a different issue as well, so
I'm going to stick with the revision I have, unless it would help you
for me to try revision 1221 too, in which case please let me know. :-)

** Attachment added: "Screenshot_20200709_073623.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1864365/+attachment/5391039/+files/Screenshot_20200709_073623.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864365

Title:
  [snap] Dialog font missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1864365/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 59793] PID file problem

2006-09-10 Thread Chris Williamson
Public bug reported:

Immediately after installing the package, I was able to launch Bricolage
at localhost:8080. But after a reboot, the browser told me there was no
server at that address. Manually running bric_apachectl start didn't
help.

My /var/log/bricolage/error.log read:

[Fri Sep  8 03:17:24 2006] [info] created shared memory segment #4325399
[Fri Sep  8 03:17:25 2006] [notice] Apache/1.3.34 (Ubuntu) mod_perl/1.29 
configured -- resuming normal operations
[Fri Sep  8 03:17:25 2006] [info] Server built: Jan  7 2006 16:00:45
[Fri Sep  8 03:17:25 2006] [notice] Accept mutex: sysvsem (Default: sysvsem)
[Fri Sep  8 03:35:07 2006] [error] access to /login failed for 127.0.0.1, 
reason: Invalid username or password. Please try again.
[Fri Sep  8 03:36:50 2006] [error] access to /login failed for 127.0.0.1, 
reason: Invalid username or password. Please try again.
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:53 2006] [warn] child process 32745 still did not exit, 
sending a SIGTERM
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:53 2006] [warn] child process 32746 still did not exit, 
sending a SIGTERM
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:53 2006] [warn] child process 482 still did not exit, sending 
a SIGTERM
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:53 2006] [warn] child process 483 still did not exit, sending 
a SIGTERM
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:53 2006] [warn] child process 484 still did not exit, sending 
a SIGTERM
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:57 2006] [error] child process 32745 still did not exit, 
sending a SIGKILL
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:57 2006] [error] child process 32746 still did not exit, 
sending a SIGKILL
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:57 2006] [error] child process 482 still did not exit, 
sending a SIGKILL
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:57 2006] [error] child process 483 still did not exit, 
sending a SIGKILL
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:57 2006] [error] child process 484 still did not exit, 
sending a SIGKILL
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:57 2006] [info] removed PID file 
/var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid (pid=32744)
[Fri Sep  8 03:45:57 2006] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
fopen: No such file or directory
apache-perl: could not log pid to file /var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid
fopen: No such file or directory
apache-perl: could not log pid to file /var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid
fopen: No such file or directory
apache-perl: could not log pid to file /var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid
fopen: No such file or directory
apache-perl: could not log pid to file /var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid
fopen: No such file or directory
apache-perl: could not log pid to file /var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid
fopen: No such file or directory
apache-perl: could not log pid to file /var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid
fopen: No such file or directory
apache-perl: could not log pid to file /var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid
fopen: No such file or directory
apache-perl: could not log pid to file /var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid
fopen: No such file or directory
apache-perl: could not log pid to file /var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid
fopen: No such file or directory
apache-perl: could not log pid to file /var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid
fopen: No such file or directory
apache-perl: could not log pid to file /var/run/bricolage/bricolage.pid

Further investigation revealed there was no bricolage directory in
/var/run, which is owned by root. Others can read and execute there, but
not write. Bricolage is set in the config file to run as user bricolage.
I was able to get bricolage running again by manually creating
/var/run/bricolage with sudo and making user bricolage the owner.

I wish I'd been more patient during installation of the package, because
I seem to recall some kind of errors or warnings involving permissions
problems. I'd be happy to post any other logs I have that may help if
you can tell me where to look for them.

** Affects: bricolage (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Untriaged
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
PID file problem
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59793

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs