[Bug 1961832] Re: jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk-kvm.img NoCloud data source not detected with qemu SATA cdrom

2022-02-24 Thread Cole Robinson
Thanks for testing James. But that's different from what I'm seeing. True full reproducer for me: Host: Fedora 35 git clone https://github.com/virt-manager/virt-manager cd virt-manager wget https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/jammy/current/jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk-kvm.img # change image

[Bug 1961832] Re: jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk-kvm.img NoCloud data source not detected with qemu SATA cdrom

2022-02-23 Thread Cole Robinson
The reporter of the virt-install bug also found this expired focal cloud-images bug which sounds like the same root issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1940791 If someone with more launchpad knowledge can route this report to the correct place, please do. Would be nice to get this

[Bug 1359815] Re: virt-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in _pygi_argument_from_object()

2014-08-21 Thread Cole Robinson
If you are using latest pygobject, like 3.13.4 or later, you are probably hitting this: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735090 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130758 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #735090 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735090 ** Bug

[Bug 568445] Re: LVM backed drives should default to cache='none'

2010-08-18 Thread Cole Robinson
Anthony, upstream virt-manager doesn't change the cache default, though we do in RHEL. Wasn't the idea of having an adaptive cache default for qemu given the okay on qemu-devel, particularly for cache=none for block devs? or am I imagining things (could be the case since I can't seem to find the

[Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

2010-06-02 Thread Cole Robinson
I filed an upstream libvirt bug for the dd block size issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599091 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #599091 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599091 -- virsh save is very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447 You received this

[Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

2010-06-02 Thread Cole Robinson
I filed an upstream libvirt bug for the dd block size issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599091 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #599091 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599091 -- virsh save is very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447 You received this