[Bug 1836979] Re: Kodi crashes with “nouveau_vp3_video_buffer_create: Assertion `templat->interlaced' failed”
Hello, I got this error, too: kodi-x11: ../src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_vp3_video.c:91: nouveau_vp3_video_buffer_create: Assertion `templat->interlaced' failed. Fresh install of Ubuntu Server 18.04 (+SSH +Samba) Kodi install like so: sudo apt-get install software-properties-common sudo add-apt-repository ppa:team-xbmc/ppa sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install kodi sudo apt-get install xauth xorg xinit xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg xserver-common sudo apt-get install lightdm sudo adduser kodi sudo usermod -a -G cdrom,audio,video,plugdev,users,dialout,dip,input kodi sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg-legacy -> Select Anybody sudo nano /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config Add to the file: needs_root_rights=yes +Service: [Unit] Description = Kodi-standalone using xinit After = remote-fs.target systemd-user-sessions.service sound.target network-online.target [Service] User = kodi Group = kodi Type = simple ExecStart = /usr/bin/xinit /usr/bin/dbus-launch /usr/bin/kodi-standalone -- :0 -nolisten tcp Restart = on-abort [Install] WantedBy = multi-user.target +Enable service: sudo systemctl enable kodi.service +edit /etc/security/limits.conf and add : kodi - nice-1 Does a workaround exist? Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836979 Title: Kodi crashes with “nouveau_vp3_video_buffer_create: Assertion `templat->interlaced' failed” To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1836979/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791992] Re: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?)
Yes, even the newest releases are prone to this problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791992 Title: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/791992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791992] Re: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?)
@Ketil I have lightning-fast hardware raid and the problem still occurs. My guess is that it has something to do with fragmentation prevention: the search for a continuous free block takes too much time. I am not technically adept to check that however. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791992 Title: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/791992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 881792] Re: System will not power down after shutdown
I have nearly the same problem as the original poster. Ubuntu server, 64bit. I just upgraded from 11.04 to 11.10 (Zotac ITX board) - and I did not change any settings in the process so it should work as before. But. The system will not power off when it's supposed to - which is scheduled to happen at 23:00 every day (via cron). It will halt the system but it will not cut the power; I have to hold down the power button to cut the power. The last two messages are: * Will now halt... [ 174.941747] System halted. Thanks for fixing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881792 Title: System will not power down after shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/881792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 859075] Re: Oneiric does not shutdown
I have nearly the same problem as the original poster. Ubuntu server, 64bit. I just upgraded from 11.04 to 11.10 (Zotac ITX board) - and I did not change any settings in the process so it should work as before. But. The system will not power off when it's supposed to - which is scheduled to happen at 23:00 every day (via cron). It will halt the system but it will not cut the power; I have to hold down the power button to cut the power. The last two messages are: * Will now halt... [ 174.941747] System halted. Thanks for fixing. Same as Bug #881792, Bug #809628 and Bug #880240. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kde-workspace in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859075 Title: Oneiric does not shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/859075/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 880240] Re: ubuntu 11.10 : the system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given
I have nearly the same problem as the original poster. Ubuntu server, 64bit. I just upgraded from 11.04 to 11.10 (Zotac ITX board) - and I did not change any settings in the process so it should work as before. But. The system will not power off when it's supposed to - which is scheduled to happen at 23:00 every day (via cron). It will halt the system but it will not cut the power; I have to hold down the power button to cut the power. The last two messages are: * Will now halt... [ 174.941747] System halted. Thanks for fixing. Same as Bug #881792, Bug #809628 and Bug #859075. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880240 Title: ubuntu 11.10 : the system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/880240/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 881792] Re: System will not power down after shutdown
Same as Bug #859075, Bug #809628 and Bug #880240. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881792 Title: System will not power down after shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/881792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 809628] Re: halt does not power off the system
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 859075 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859075 I have nearly the same problem as the original poster. Ubuntu server, 64bit. I just upgraded from 11.04 to 11.10 (Zotac ITX board) - and I did not change any settings in the process so it should work as before. But. The system will not power off when it's supposed to - which is scheduled to happen at 23:00 every day (via cron). It will halt the system but it will not cut the power; I have to hold down the power button to cut the power. The last two messages are: * Will now halt... [ 174.941747] System halted. Thanks for fixing. Same as Bug #881792 and Bug #880240. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809628 Title: halt does not power off the system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/809628/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 859075] Re: Oneiric does not shutdown
BTW, wake-on-lan won't work after this. I wonder if it's related. Since physical access to the hardware is limited, I would appreciate a fast-track resolution on this. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kde-workspace in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859075 Title: Oneiric does not shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/859075/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 881792] Re: System will not power down after shutdown
BTW, wake-on-lan won't work after this. I wonder if it's related. Since physical access to the hardware is limited, I would appreciate a fast-track resolution on this. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881792 Title: System will not power down after shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/881792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 880240] Re: ubuntu 11.10 : the system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given
BTW, wake-on-lan won't work after this. I wonder if it's related. Since physical access to the hardware is limited, I would appreciate a fast-track resolution on this. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880240 Title: ubuntu 11.10 : the system doesn't turn off if sudo halt is given To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/880240/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 809628] Re: halt does not power off the system
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 859075 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859075 BTW, wake-on-lan won't work after this. I wonder if it's related. Since physical access to the hardware is limited, I would appreciate a fast-track resolution on this. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809628 Title: halt does not power off the system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/809628/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791992] Re: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?)
Hi all, my RAID array is filling up, so this bug started to effect me as well. My NAS is running from a 40GB SSD drive. Linux CSNAS 2.6.38-8-server #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:49:04 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=11.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=natty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 11.04 I have a RAID6 setup, 16x2TB disks using an Adaptec 51645 card. It is a single EXT4 volume: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda111518469088 10420881676 1097587412 91% /mnt/raid6 Mount params: # file system mount point type options dump pass # RAID6 - backups /dev/sda1 /mnt/raid6 ext4 suid,dev,exec,nodelalloc 0 0 I was able to transfer data with a sustained transfer speed of 96MB/sec from my PC to it via LAN (which is nearly the full Gigabit bandwidth) using Samba (client: Windows 7 x64 SP1). Now that I passed the 90% mark, the write speeds have dropped to a very low rate and I get random speeds in the range of 1MB/sec to 14MB/sec. At quite a few occasions Windows reports 'disk full' and the transfer is aborted; this is most annoying with large files (size10GB) because I simply cannot transfer these anymore (they time out eventually). Dunno if it's related, but since this is not a system disk, I have reduced the reserved space to 0 (meaning that I should be able to utilize the remaining space just the same). Read speeds (no write): cs@CSNAS:~$ sudo hdparm -t /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing buffered disk reads: 1208 MB in 3.00 seconds = 402.63 MB/sec Read speeds (write): cs@CSNAS:~$ sudo hdparm -t /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing buffered disk reads: 314 MB in 3.29 seconds = 95.51 MB/sec -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791992 Title: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/791992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607698] [NEW] karmic to lucid upgrade: hardware RAID array disappeared
Public bug reported: I had a 64bit server based on Ubuntu 9.10. There is a SATA flash drive. It has three partitions (an NTFS with Windows on it - never used; just in case), an ext4 partition containing the system itself (ext4), and the swap. The system partition used to be /dev/sda1. Then, there is a RAID array containing the backups. The array consists of eight 1.5TB disks on an Adaptec 51645 card, all configured as a RAID 6 array; formatted as a single ext4 partition. This used to be /dev/sdb1. It's been a while since Lucid has been released, so I decided to upgrade. I used these commands: sudo aptitude install update-manager-core sudo do-release-upgrade -d At some point I was asked to replace a configuration file - I chose to replace it with the new version. At the Grub2 setup, I marked the first disk and all its partitions. I saw a warning on the console about installing Grub on partitions being a bad idea, but it went away quickly, so I could not make a proper note of it. Other than that, I got no errors and everything went normal. After reboot, the system works, the services are running, but instead of the RAID array, the system partition was mounted - I guess because /dev/sda1 (the ext4 partition containing the system) became /dev/sdb1 - and the RAID array is not visible at all. 2.6.32-23-server ~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 ~$ df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 7692876 1592356 5709744 22% / none893684 228893456 1% /dev none898112 0898112 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 898112 0898112 0% /tmp none898112 248897864 1% /var/run none898112 0898112 0% /var/lock none898112 0898112 0% /lib/init/rw I attached /etc/fstab (just in case). Note that the RAID6 mount is commented out for now. I found similar problem reports on lauchpad, but I could not relate my problem to any of those completely, so I decided to report it. I guess it will take a while to fix it, so my immediate question is: how can I make the RAID array visible again? Since I have no GUI (not even a monitor so I can's see pre-boot msges), so I would appreciate instructions usable via SSH console. Thank you. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- karmic to lucid upgrade: hardware RAID array disappeared https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607698] Re: karmic to lucid upgrade: hardware RAID array disappeared
** Attachment added: fstab http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52205467/fstab -- karmic to lucid upgrade: hardware RAID array disappeared https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607873] [NEW] Lucid AMD64 Server clean install: Grub does not load
Public bug reported: I have a 40GB SSD. I create a 32GB Primary partition, and install Windows XP Pro there. I leave the rest empty. I start installing Ubuntu Server 10.04 AMD64 from the CD (ubuntu-10.04-server-amd64.iso). At some point I need to select the partition to install Lucid. First, I selected use biggest free space option. When I tried installing Lucid a second time, I chose manual partitioning and I chose automatic in the second menu. The result it identical in both cases. The installation goes through just fine, at the end, Grub identifies the Windows XP Pro partition correctly, and recommends updating the master boot record - so I chose yes. After reboot, Windows XP Pro is loaded. Grub does not appear and thus, the server that just installed successfully is nowhere to be seen... The partitions seem ok under XP's partition manager (two unknown partitions are shown, probably / and swap). I am guessing that there is something wrong with the debian-installer, because Grub does not even appear. I tried fixing Grub using the recovery mode on the install CD. In this case, I can select the root file system /dev/sdb5, but when I try to re-install Grub any /dev/sdb* device, I get a red screen with an error message. For a temporary solution: Is there any way to install the old Grub instead of Grub2? Thank you. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Lucid AMD64 Server clean install: Grub does not load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607873 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607873] Re: Lucid AMD64 Server clean install: Grub does not load
Small update. I could not install Lucid despite my efforts, so I have to put Karmic back (can't wait). Karmic installed flawlessly (on the same system). There is one difference that I noticed during the installation process of Karmic and Lucid: Karmic put the boot drive first (/dev/sda), while Lucid put the boot drive second (/dev/sdb). -- Lucid AMD64 Server clean install: Grub does not load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607873 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575296] Re: Ubuntu boot delay - nForce error
Just subscribing for now - will check when back from vacation. -- Ubuntu boot delay - nForce error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 498734] Re: nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP
Hi Thierry, I could, but it did not happen lately. There were a few updates release in the last couple of weeks, and it just stopped happening. I guess it must have been this fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169 Let me know if you want the logs anyway. -- nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 498734] Re: nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP
Hi Thierry, I could, but it did not happen lately. There were a few updates release in the last couple of weeks, and it just stopped happening. I guess it must have been this fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169 Let me know if you want the logs anyway. -- nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346691] Re: 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations
I managed to grab a part of the long long output (this is just a fraction of the whole dump). See attachment. ** Attachment added: INODES.TXT http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39933385/INODES.TXT -- 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346691] Re: 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations
Hi there, I am afraid I have the same problem - the EXT4 file system getting corrupted over time. I've built a NAS from Ubuntu 9.10 Server amd64. The system+temp is on an SSD drive, while the data is on a RAID6 array using an Adaptec 51645 card and 8 identical 1.5TB disks. I use use SSH/PUTTY to manage the box and Samba to access the data (fill using my Windows machine, play using XBMC on Linux mini), and I never reboot the machine unless there was an update installed. uname -r: 2.6.31-19-server fstab: /dev/sdb1/mnt/raid6 ext4 suid,dev,exec,nodelalloc 0 0 I never noticed anything wrong, but today I was looking for a file that was supposed to be there. The file was not there, but there were files from other directories(!). So, obviously there is something wrong. I removed the mount command from fstab, reboot, then I run: sudo fsck.ext4 -fyv /dev/sdb1 I got massive amounts of inode issues - I could not take a copy because the PUTTY buffer seems to be too small (text has been pushed off very quickly). Right now it says Clone multiply-claimed blocks? yes and it's hanging - I understand it takes quite a while. I wonder if I am a victim of the same corruption reported in this thread and whether I can fix it using fsck.ext4. I would not like to loose any data, because I just can't recover it from anywhere (these are HD family movies, pictures and such nowhere else to be found). I never planned on making backups because RAID6 offers good protection and using nodelalloc in the mount options should protect from power loss. Please advise. Thank you. ** Attachment added: LSHW.TXT http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39897011/LSHW.TXT -- 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346691] Re: 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations
This sounds similar: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/528981 -- 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 440470] Re: [ubuntu-boot-experience] nForce2_smbus conflicts with ACPI region SM00
Invalid? Care to explain why? -- [ubuntu-boot-experience] nForce2_smbus conflicts with ACPI region SM00 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 498734] Re: nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP
The one that ships with Ubuntu Server 9.10. $ smbd -V Version 3.4.0 -- nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 498734] Re: nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP
The one that ships with Ubuntu Server 9.10. $ smbd -V Version 3.4.0 -- nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462169] Re: nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed -- nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 462169] Re: nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed -- nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462169] Re: nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet
This might be somehow related, though it's about samba stopping randomly - rather than not starting at all: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/498734 -- nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 462169] Re: nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet
This might be somehow related, though it's about samba stopping randomly - rather than not starting at all: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/498734 -- nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 498734] [NEW] nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba I found a number of reports about nmbd not starting. For me nmbd does start, but stops randomly, so while this is a different bug, it must be somehow related. But, first things first. I am new to Linux. I followed various tutorial on the net to install a NAS using Ubuntu Server. I installed it, was working for a while, then it stopped working, I reinstalled it, and this cycle was going on and on and on like 10 times. Then, I decided to call in a favour from a friend who has experience. I installed Ubuntu Server 9.10 again (amd64), updated the system using apt-get (that was yesterday, 19-Dec-2009), configured Samba again the way I used to, and I called my friend to take a look. He used ssh to access the machine, and do his magic. He fine-tuned Samba with the users and permissions I wanted, then he said we should also reboot the system to make sure that everything mounts and loads as it should - so, we rebooted the the system. After reboot, I could access my Samba share just fine. So, we opened a drink to celebrate. About five minutes later, I went back to the machine to map the drives, but I could not access the Samba share using the netbios name from Windows XP - I could access it using the IP address though. We had no idea what was going on and we've been Google-ing around for hours, trying various configuration changes in network setting as recommended by various messages claiming that it solved their problem. Well, none of those network tweaks have helped us, so I gave up. My friend was pissed because it was supposed to work so he kept checking things I know nothing about. Then he said: f**k, nmbd is not running! He restarted Samba (and with it nmbd) and everything was working again. After a while, it stopped again. He tried restarting Samba again, but this time it did not work. He said we should start from boot and he will watch it and see when it stops and why. So, we reboot and he keeps his eyes open. He said there are some read errors in /var/log/samba/log.nmbd for the socket. The is what he sent me: read_socket_with_timeout: read error = Socket operation on non-socket. read from child failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED I Googled about this and I ended up here, sounds like it to me (who don't know much about Linux): http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/1998-March/006767.html My friend ended up on this forum, here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169 Though that error talks about nmbd not starting. For us, nmbd does start (he found traces and I can also access the Samna share using the netbios host name), but it stops at some point which we could not track down. Thank you for fixing. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 498734] [NEW] nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba I found a number of reports about nmbd not starting. For me nmbd does start, but stops randomly, so while this is a different bug, it must be somehow related. But, first things first. I am new to Linux. I followed various tutorial on the net to install a NAS using Ubuntu Server. I installed it, was working for a while, then it stopped working, I reinstalled it, and this cycle was going on and on and on like 10 times. Then, I decided to call in a favour from a friend who has experience. I installed Ubuntu Server 9.10 again (amd64), updated the system using apt-get (that was yesterday, 19-Dec-2009), configured Samba again the way I used to, and I called my friend to take a look. He used ssh to access the machine, and do his magic. He fine-tuned Samba with the users and permissions I wanted, then he said we should also reboot the system to make sure that everything mounts and loads as it should - so, we rebooted the the system. After reboot, I could access my Samba share just fine. So, we opened a drink to celebrate. About five minutes later, I went back to the machine to map the drives, but I could not access the Samba share using the netbios name from Windows XP - I could access it using the IP address though. We had no idea what was going on and we've been Google-ing around for hours, trying various configuration changes in network setting as recommended by various messages claiming that it solved their problem. Well, none of those network tweaks have helped us, so I gave up. My friend was pissed because it was supposed to work so he kept checking things I know nothing about. Then he said: f**k, nmbd is not running! He restarted Samba (and with it nmbd) and everything was working again. After a while, it stopped again. He tried restarting Samba again, but this time it did not work. He said we should start from boot and he will watch it and see when it stops and why. So, we reboot and he keeps his eyes open. He said there are some read errors in /var/log/samba/log.nmbd for the socket. The is what he sent me: read_socket_with_timeout: read error = Socket operation on non-socket. read from child failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED I Googled about this and I ended up here, sounds like it to me (who don't know much about Linux): http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/1998-March/006767.html My friend ended up on this forum, here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169 Though that error talks about nmbd not starting. For us, nmbd does start (he found traces and I can also access the Samna share using the netbios host name), but it stops at some point which we could not track down. Thank you for fixing. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- nmbd stops randomly - cannot access using hostname from Windows XP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 440470] Re: [ubuntu-boot-experience] nForce2_smbus conflicts with ACPI region SM00
I have a Zotac GF9300-G-E, PCB version 4. I use Ubuntu 9.10, amd64 I get this error message: ACPI: I/O resource nForce2_smbus [0x1c80-0x1cbf] conflicts with ACPI region SM01 [0x1c80-0x1cbf] nForce2_smbus :00:03.2: Error probing SMB2. Here's the output of sudo dmidecode: # dmidecode 2.9 SMBIOS 2.5 present. 40 structures occupying 1230 bytes. Table at 0x000F. Handle 0x, DMI type 0, 24 bytes BIOS Information Vendor: Phoenix Technologies, LTD Version: 6.00 PG Release Date: 10/09/2009 Address: 0xE Runtime Size: 128 kB ROM Size: 1024 kB Characteristics: ISA is supported PCI is supported PNP is supported APM is supported BIOS is upgradeable BIOS shadowing is allowed Boot from CD is supported Selectable boot is supported BIOS ROM is socketed EDD is supported 5.25/360 KB floppy services are supported (int 13h) 5.25/1.2 MB floppy services are supported (int 13h) 3.5/720 KB floppy services are supported (int 13h) 3.5/2.88 MB floppy services are supported (int 13h) Print screen service is supported (int 5h) 8042 keyboard services are supported (int 9h) Serial services are supported (int 14h) Printer services are supported (int 17h) CGA/mono video services are supported (int 10h) ACPI is supported USB legacy is supported LS-120 boot is supported ATAPI Zip drive boot is supported BIOS boot specification is supported Targeted content distribution is supported Handle 0x0001, DMI type 1, 27 bytes System Information Manufacturer: NVIDIA Product Name: MCP7A Version: 2 Serial Number: 1 UUID: ---0807-060504030201 Wake-up Type: Power Switch SKU Number: Family: Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 8 bytes Base Board Information Manufacturer: NVIDIA Product Name: MCP7A Version: 2 Serial Number: 1 Handle 0x0003, DMI type 3, 17 bytes Chassis Information Manufacturer: NVIDIA Type: Desktop Lock: Not Present Version: MCP7A Serial Number: Asset Tag: Boot-up State: Unknown Power Supply State: Unknown Thermal State: Unknown Security Status: Unknown OEM Information: 0x Handle 0x0004, DMI type 4, 40 bytes Processor Information Socket Designation: Socket 775 Type: Central Processor Family: Other Manufacturer: Intel ID: 7A 06 01 00 FF FB EB BF Version: Intel(R) Celeron(R) Voltage: 1.2 V External Clock: 200 MHz Max Speed: 1200 MHz Current Speed: 1200 MHz Status: Populated, Enabled Upgrade: ZIF Socket L1 Cache Handle: 0x000A L2 Cache Handle: 0x000B L3 Cache Handle: Not Provided Serial Number: Asset Tag: Part Number: Core Count: 2 Core Enabled: 2 Thread Count: 2 Characteristics: 64-bit capable Handle 0x0005, DMI type 5, 24 bytes Memory Controller Information Error Detecting Method: 8-bit Parity Error Correcting Capabilities: None Supported Interleave: One-way Interleave Current Interleave: One-way Interleave Maximum Memory Module Size: 32 MB Maximum Total Memory Size: 128 MB Supported Speeds: 70 ns 60 ns Supported Memory Types: Standard EDO Memory Module Voltage: 5.0 V Associated Memory Slots: 4 0x0006 0x0007 0x0008 0x0009 Enabled Error Correcting Capabilities: None Handle 0x0006, DMI type 6, 12 bytes Memory Module Information Socket Designation: A0 Bank Connections: 0 Current Speed: 10 ns Type: Other Installed Size: 1024 MB (Single-bank Connection) Enabled Size: 1024 MB (Single-bank Connection) Error Status: OK Handle 0x0007, DMI type 6, 12 bytes Memory Module Information Socket Designation: A1 Bank Connections: 2 Current Speed: 10 ns Type: Other Installed Size: 1024 MB (Single-bank Connection) Enabled Size: 1024 MB (Single-bank Connection) Error Status: OK Handle 0x0008, DMI type 6, 12 bytes Memory Module Information Socket Designation: A2 Bank Connections: None Current Speed: 10 ns Type: Other Installed Size: Not Installed Enabled Size: Not Installed Error Status: OK Handle 0x0009, DMI type
