[Bug 1089069] Re: When taking a screenshot sometimes the image will look orange-colored
Is this a duplicate of #743176? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089069 Title: When taking a screenshot sometimes the image will look orange-colored To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1089069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 743176] Re: Pink layer on taken screenshots (gnome-screenshot)
** Also affects: gnome-screenshot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gnome-flashback (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743176 Title: Pink layer on taken screenshots (gnome-screenshot) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-flashback/+bug/743176/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1406538] Re: Screenshot contains selected area highlight
Is this different from #743176? I considered marking it as a duplicate, but there seems to be more recent development work here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406538 Title: Screenshot contains selected area highlight To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint/+bug/1406538/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762241] Re: gnome-screenshot does not get rid of (orange) selection window in final "Select area to grab" screenshots
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 743176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743176 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 743176 Pink layer on taken screenshots (gnome-screenshot) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762241 Title: gnome-screenshot does not get rid of (orange) selection window in final "Select area to grab" screenshots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-utils/+bug/762241/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249663] Re: Trusty gnome flashback indicator-applet-complete disappeared completely. Nothing displays in the top right panel.
created a new panel? Would you please elaborate on how? A little searching suggested right-click on the panel and choose New but when I right-click, nothing happens. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249663 Title: Trusty gnome flashback indicator-applet-complete disappeared completely. Nothing displays in the top right panel. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-applet/+bug/1249663/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1309971] [NEW] other workspaces are blank with no way to switch back
Public bug reported: What I did; - upgraded to 14.04 trusty - installed gnome-session-flashback - logged out; logged in with gnome flashback (compiz) - in the lower left corner, right click to bring up preferences; change number of workspaces to 4 - click on workspace 3 What I expected: - a panel (with clock etc.) above and a (mostly) blank taskbar below with a workspace switcher - or at least the ability to get back to workspace 1 using ALT-arrow What I saw instead: - a screen completely blank except for the background - no way to change workspaces, launch programs log out, etc. I had to CTRL-ALT-F1 and loging and `sudo /etc/init.d/lightdm restart` to log in again. Of course, I lose my session state. The symptoms are very much like #156502. That bug was closed as as invalid with an explanation of This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system but no reference to the bug that was already reported. If it was already reported, shouldn't the status be something like duplicate? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: gnome-session-flashback 1:3.8.0-1ubuntu11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Sat Apr 19 08:29:31 2014 GsettingsChanges: InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-04-12 (372 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20130213) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: gnome-panel UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-18 (1 days ago) ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309971 Title: other workspaces are blank with no way to switch back To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/1309971/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1309971] Re: other workspaces are blank with no way to switch back
Odd... the symptoms have gone away. I'm not sure what changed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309971 Title: other workspaces are blank with no way to switch back To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/1309971/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576628] Re: [Upstream] [ooo-build] Writer not displaying values of drop-down field from Word .doc
Ah. I see now. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576628 Title: [Upstream] [ooo-build] Writer not displaying values of drop-down field from Word .doc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/576628/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576628] Re: [Upstream] [ooo-build] Writer not displaying values of drop-down field from Word .doc
Hmm... Won't Fix? I can't seem to figure out why not. It's been confirmed as a regression. Would you please add a few words of explanation? Am I missing some policy about upstream bug handling or something? Or is this just a considered decision about how the package maintainers are (not) going to spend their time? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576628 Title: [Upstream] [ooo-build] Writer not displaying values of drop-down field from Word .doc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/576628/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680972] Re: e-calendar-factory pegs cpu for a while on access to GroupWise calendar
No, I don't see this particular problem any longer with Natty. I still see other performance problems with evolution calendar; I hope to report them separately, once I narrow them down to reproducible bugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680972 Title: e-calendar-factory pegs cpu for a while on access to GroupWise calendar To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/680972/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636711] Re: 10.10 can't mount squashfs file system
I saw this problem with 11.04. I checked the md5sum of my .iso, and sure enough, it was bad. The right md5sum was remarkably hard to find. http://releases.ubuntu.com/11.04/MD5SUMS 7de611b50c283c1755b4007a4feb0379 ubuntu-11.04-desktop-amd64.iso I suggest putting it in small print right below the big orange download buttons on http://www.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu/download or at least a link to something like https://help.ubuntu.com/community/HowToMD5SUM -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636711 Title: 10.10 can't mount squashfs file system -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780009] [NEW] a radio button on this PDF form makes evince exit with an error
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince Steps to reproduce: 1. evince Computer-LaptopRequestForm-edit_v2.pdf 2. click the Staff radio button, and BLAMMO: Error (0): Call to Object where the object was type 4, not the expected type 6 Aborted This is the worst sort of bug, to my mind: it throws away the information I just entered into the form. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: evince 2.32.0-0ubuntu1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.50-generic 2.6.35.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon May 9 11:14:37 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1) KernLog: ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evince ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780009 Title: a radio button on this PDF form makes evince exit with an error -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780009] Re: a radio button on this PDF form makes evince exit with an error
** Attachment added: problematic PDF form https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780009/+attachment/2121356/+files/Computer-LaptopRequestForm-edit_v2.pdf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780009 Title: a radio button on this PDF form makes evince exit with an error -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680972] [NEW] e-calendar-factory pegs cpu for a while on access to GroupWise calendar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution-data-server To reproduce: 1. In evolution, add a groupwise calendar 2. Bring up the gnome calendar panel applet showing your appointments for the day and such 3. Click the date again to put the panel applet away expected result: applet goes away with no perceived latency observed result: applet remains on screen and CPU utilization goes to 100% for 10 or 15 seconds; then applet goes away and CPU usage returns to normal The symptoms and such are quite similar to: Debian Bug report logs - #600804 evolution-data-server: e-calendar-factory consumes 100% on every access to calendars (and then returns to normal) http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600804 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:21:02 UTC ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: evolution-data-server 2.30.3-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Nov 24 08:47:04 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evolution-data-server ** Affects: evolution-data-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- e-calendar-factory pegs cpu for a while on access to GroupWise calendar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680972] Re: e-calendar-factory pegs cpu for a while on access to GroupWise calendar
-- e-calendar-factory pegs cpu for a while on access to GroupWise calendar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 598624] [NEW] evolution silently discards message flags when moving between GroupWise folders
Public bug reported: I'm using evolutoin as a GroupWise client. If I flag a message and then move it to another folder, the flag status is silently discarded. Any idea why? ARGH! I *hate* it when computers throw away my work! And doing it silently is even worse! ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- evolution silently discards message flags when moving between GroupWise folders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576628] [NEW] values of drop-down fields in imported MS Word files don't display
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org To reproduce the problem: 1.Start MS Word. 2.Open the forms toolbar (view/toolbars menu). 3.Click drop-down field icon to insert a field. 4.Double-click the inserted field; add some choices: choice A, choice B, choice C 5.protect the document (Tools/Protect Document…) 6. choose one of the choices, e.g. choice B 7. save the document (I have an example to attach) 8. Open the document in openoffice writer expected results: choice B shows up actual result: field shows as grey background, but no field value is chosen in fact, if you then choose an option, it doesn't display either. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: openoffice.org-writer 1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu May 6 15:44:16 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- values of drop-down fields in imported MS Word files don't display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576628] Re: values of drop-down fields in imported MS Word files don't display
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47959075/Dependencies.txt -- values of drop-down fields in imported MS Word files don't display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576628] Re: values of drop-down fields in imported MS Word files don't display
This is a document I created as described above. ** Attachment added: word document with drop-down field http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47959686/oo-form-problem-demo.doc -- values of drop-down fields in imported MS Word files don't display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574686] [NEW] can't get lucid installer to upgrade offline, without going over the net
Public bug reported: I'm trying to upgrade to Ubuntu 10.4 lucid from a torrent; I found directions at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LucidUpgrades#Upgrading%20from%20a%20Torrent Getting the torrent was no trouble; it took about 20 minutes to get both the desktop and the alternate image (I didn't realize I needed the alternate image until I had started getting the desktop image). $ md5sum *i386* 5b2dadacfd692b4f2d5c7cf034539262 ubuntu-10.04-alternate-i386.iso d044a2a0c8103fc3e5b7e18b0f7de1c8 ubuntu-10.04-desktop-i386.iso Then I mounted the image a la: $ sudo mount -o loop /home/connolly/Desktop/OpenSource/OpenSource- CD/ubuntu-10.04-alternate-i386.iso /media/cdrom0 and then I started the installer: $ gksu sh /cdrom/cdromupgrade At the Include latest updates from the Internet? dialog, I answered No. It says quite clearly: If you answer 'no' here, the network is not used at all. but then I get a Do you want to start the upgrade? dialog that says You have to download a total of 1,209M. I thought perhaps download was a misnomer and that it would get the packages locally, but (a) the network went *very* busy (estimating hours to days to complete), so I cancelled it; (b) I took the network down with sudo ifdown eth0 and tried again, and it failed altogether Then I thought perhaps the problem was related to using a mounted .iso image rather than a physical CD, so I burned the image to CD and tried again. Same symptoms (with the alternate and then the desktop CD). I have logs of all of these attempts; I think the one with eth0 down is likely to have the most information; let's see if I can figure out how to attach it... Ugh... I don't see any way to attach files. So I put it in http://pastebin.com/C5S97rRY Hmm... package linux got attached to this question somewhow; I doubt that's the relevant package, but I'm not sure which is... perhaps update-manager-core? ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- can't get lucid installer to upgrade offline, without going over the net https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574686] Re: can't get lucid installer to upgrade offline, without going over the net
I gather that unlike Answers, bugs can have files attached, so here's that log file again... ** Attachment added: main.log with eth0 down http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47624372/main.log -- can't get lucid installer to upgrade offline, without going over the net https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 11334] Re: MASTER Copy-Paste doesn't work if the source is closed before the paste
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 19:13 +, Tralalalala wrote: [...much ranting elided...] Users are losing their work time after time. They write a large e-mail in OpenOffice.org (yes, some people do such things), then copy everything, close OpenOffice.org and start Evolution to send the contents of the clipboard to someone. This works in every operating system (except Linux) and users are used to this behavior. It's completely obvious this works, always and everywhere. It's completely obvious to expect this behavior in Linux and it's completely ridiculous this doesn't work in Linux. For a user it's completely obvious the content isn't lost, so a user just closes OpenOffice.org and is really surprised when he wants to paste the content of the clipboard in Evolution and the clipboard is empty. A user really doesn't know what's going on and he's lost maybe an hour of work!!! Indeed, this is what concerns me. When I was doing product development, a bug that caused loss of user data was SEV 1 and took priority over just about everything else. I'm having a hard time reconciling this with Importance: wishlist in launchpad. While I acknowledge the challenge of getting the problem fixed in a large variety of applications, I think a lot of the heated discussion here would be reduced if launchpad more clearly acknowledged the severity of the bug. The affects me too mechanism is relevant, of course; evidently 53 people have found/used it. But when people are affected by this bug, they're much more likely to throw their computer out the window than learn about launchpad and find the affects me too button. On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 20:24 +, Saïvann Carignan wrote: Dan Connolly : Developers regularly read bugs. When they can fix the bug, they assign the bug to themself and generally, it doesn't take a week before we get a update. Each Ubuntu release has blueprints, which are discussed in UDS with the ubuntu concil. What's UDS? Whats the ubuntu council? Ah.. At the beginning of a new development cycle, Ubuntu developers from around the world gather to help shape and scope the next release of Ubuntu. The summit is open to the public, but is not a traditional conference, exhibition or other audience-oriented event. Rather, it is an opportunity for Ubuntu developers - who usually collaborate online - to work together in person on specific tasks. -- http://www.ubuntu.com/news/spotlight/uds The social structures and community processes of Ubuntu are supervised by the Ubuntu Community Council. It is the Community Council that approves the creation of a new Team or Project, and appointment of team leaders. ... You can submit an item or proposal for discussion by the Community Council using the wiki page CommunityCouncilAgenda. http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/council Thanks. That's the sort of answer I was looking for when I asked how development priorities get set. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E -- MASTER Copy-Paste doesn't work if the source is closed before the paste https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/11334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 11334] Re: MASTER Copy-Paste doesn't work if the source is closed before the paste
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 16:47 +, Jackflap wrote: Look it's open-source. It's an open-source development model. That's how it works. Is it really every-man-for-himself in Ubuntu? Doesn't Shuttleworth set priorities for each release? Isn't there a paid Canonical development staff? Don't they get together and put more priority on some things than on others? I ask in all seriousness... I'd like to know how, if at all, this launchpad bug system interacts with the way the core development team sets priorities. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E -- MASTER Copy-Paste doesn't work if the source is closed before the paste https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/11334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 288093] Re: Can't play sound because of pulseaudio hang
I'm seeing similar symptoms; after using a mixture of flash, banshee, and totem for a while, I have to kill -9 to recover. My sound device (per lspci) is: 00:05.0 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2) meanwhile, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PulseAudio seems to be out of date; it refers to libflashsupport , but apt says: Package libflashsupport is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound -- Can't play sound because of pulseaudio hang https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118789] Re: trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False
I got a clue from somebody... Your problem is that you need to pass an array as a value of a PropertyValue, and a PropertyValue can receive anything. So you have to tell the COM bridge what kind of value you are passing. second comment on http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?t=61144 -- trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118789] Re: trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False
yes, if it's like formcontrol.pdf, it's broken. What I expect is formcontrol-gui.pdf. -- trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118789] trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org The spec for the PDF export dialog says ExportFormFields oor:type=xs:boolean default:true Specifies whether form fields are exported as widgets or only their fixed print representation is exported. http://specs.openoffice.org/appwide/pdf_export/PDFExportDialog.odt but it doesn't seem to actually work. I took the ooextract.py example http://udk.openoffice.org/python/samples/ooextract.py and tried to use ExportFormFields, without luck. I'm not the only one having this problem; in a Dec 2006 forum post, I see: So, has anyone been able to use OOo's writer_pdf_export filter and the ExportFormFields property with success? I have not had success with the following code: -- http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?t=50504highlight=flatten+pdf Then I found an Aug 2006 suggestion from Giuseppe Castagno http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03726.html Castagno's code shows a FilterData indirection, so my code now looks like: filterOptions = ( PropertyValue( ExportFormFields, 0, False, 0), ) outProps = ( PropertyValue( FilterName , 0, filterName , 0 ), PropertyValue( FilterData, 0, filterOptions, 0 ), PropertyValue( Overwrite , 0, True , 0 ), PropertyValue( OutputStream, 0, OutputStream(), 0), ) but the resulting .pdf still has the form controls. It's distinctly different from what I get via the GUI, which has different shaped X's in the checkbox controls. Help? The forum post shows work-arounds involving post-processing the PDF with some iText Java library, but I'd really rather not go there. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118789] Re: trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False
attaching the whole modified ooexport.py ** Attachment added: python uno PDF export option with ExportFormFields set to False http://launchpadlibrarian.net/7980690/ooextract.py -- trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118789] Re: trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False
Here's a simple document with one form control to help reproduce the problem. ** Attachment added: formcontrol.odt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/7980729/formcontrol.odt -- trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118789] Re: trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False
This is the sort of PDF that I want; it's produced using the PDF options dialog, manually. ** Attachment added: formcontrol-gui.pdf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/7980743/formcontrol-gui.pdf -- trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118789] Re: trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False
This is the output of: $ python ooextract.py --pdf formcontrol.odt it exhibits the problem: I want it to have no form controls, but it has form controls. ** Attachment added: formcontrol.pdf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/7980822/formcontrol.pdf -- trouble using ExportFormFields in uno API; PDF form controls are exported even when set to False https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
