Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python-apt
Can we please include ftp.wa.co.za as a supported list of Ubuntu
mirrors.
Simply add below the #LOC:ZA
http://ftp.wa.co.za/pub/ubuntuarchive/
Thanks
** Affects: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed
Thanks I am marking this bug as invalid then.
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
add server to Ubuntu.mirrors ftp.wa.co.za
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678082
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
affects ubuntu/weechat
status new
importance wishlist
subscribe ubuntu-sponsors
done
Please sync weechat 0.3.3-2 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
Changelog entries since current natty version 0.3.2-1:
weechat
Public bug reported:
Please sync suckless-tools 35-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception:
Ubuntu used to contain dmenu from the package dwm-tools this has been
depricated infavour of suckless-tools.
See
https://edge.launchpad.net/~drubin/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/1260604
/+listing-archive-extra
Not sure who else would need to approve/look at this since it is not
really something that I feel comfortable submitting upstream because
there is no clear indication of why it was there in the first place.
Public bug reported:
Hi
I have before encountered an issue trying to development on 64bit OS
with Java as some pre-compiled libs require Java 32bit. When trying to
use this as a valid JDK it fails because this clearly isn't the case.
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 9.10
Release:
** Changed in: weechat (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
cleft and cright don't backward_word nor forward_word
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Didier Roche didro...@gmail.com wrote:
@David: see my comment on this same bug about the fact is was NOT
trivial:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/532754/comments/12
Ok, there were a few mixed views about how trivial it was and yes I
agree
Then surely this was a trivial fix and should and could have been fixed
before the release?
On 2 May 2010 21:22, Bernhard b.a.koe...@googlemail.com wrote:
Stephen, the images are just simple desktop screenshots.
--
gnome-appearance does not reflect order of metacity buttons correctly
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Bernhard b.a.koe...@googlemail.com wrote:
David, it's a rather aestetic issue, so I guess it didn't have absolute
priority. I hope it will be fixed at some point though.
It might not have had priority but there is almost no point fixing it.
Other then the fact
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 532822 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532822
Vish Thanks for clearing that up.
The original defect seemed to be fixed so wasn't quite sure.
--
Appearance preferences preview icons should match layout
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540907
You
** Tags added: karmic2lucid
--
After upgrade to Ubuntu 10.4, none of my previous accounts were imported
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557665
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
@Alex
I didn't look very closely when it was marked as a duplicated this bug is in
fact not a duplicate and thus am removing the duplicate tag.
I was reporting that the icons are simply on the wrong side ie they
don't match the theme.
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 532822
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 540907 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540907
This is how ever a duplicate of Bug #540907 and I am marking it as such.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 540907
Appearance preferences preview icons should match layout
--
theme
@Vish
This is not a duplicate of #532822 if you see the screen shot attached you
will see that I was suggesting that the icons are on the incorrect side and do
no match the theme.
Since Lucid the widget icons were moved to the left hand side when
selecting a theme this should reflect this.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: light-themes
Completely nit picking. Not sure how to tag this as a paper cut. ;-p
Basically Lucid have changed the default button(exit,mini,maxi) to be on
the left hand side. While in the appearance dialog appears on the right
hand side. I understand
** Attachment added: window
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41222024/Screenshot-Appearance%20Preferences.png
--
Apperence preferences preview icons should match layout
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540907
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Summary changed:
- Apperence preferences preview icons should match layout
+ Appearance preferences preview icons should match layout
--
Appearance preferences preview icons should match layout
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540907
You received this bug notification because you are a member
@Fabrice
Thanks for getting on this.
--
Missing bjavaloader and bfuse programs in barry-util package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503687
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I don't see it either. I assume the debian version doesn't have
bjavaloader in it either?
This was the main reason for upgrading to 0.15 :(
The RPM source dir in the debian package lists the bjavaloader./
rpm/barry.spec
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/bjavaloader on line 216 is there no way
Sorry could some one explain where these changes were merged to? I
understand they wont be included into Karmic but lucid still seems to
have 14.1 http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/barry-util
Thanks
--
Merge barry 0.15-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
Thanks Artur.
I was just making sure these were going into Lucid.
--
Merge barry 0.15-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426716
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Would be great to see in 10.04. since the config file has changed and is
no longer compatible would be nice to have some sort of
porting/converter to at least copy over the server/channel config
settings.
--
Sync weechat 0.3.0~rc3-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
This seems to be in unstable.
http://packages.debian.org/sid/barry-util Package: barry-util (0.15-1 and
others)
it is at 0.15 which is the version that contains bjavaloader so this version
would satisfy this bug report.
--
Upgrade to 0.15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426716
You received
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 426716 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426716
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 426716
Upgrade to 0.15
--
Request upgrade/packaging of newer version at least 0.15 missing bjavaloader
binary
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449661
You
#449661 [1] contains reasoning for upgrading to 0.15.
[1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/barry/+bug/449661
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 449661
Request upgrade/packaging of newer version at least 0.15 missing bjavaloader
binary
** This bug is no longer a
@artur
It has bjavaloader included in it, which is the only package that allows you to
install Blackberry applications onto a Blackberry device from linux. Also see
the duplicate report linked above I explain the reasoning.
--
Upgrade to 0.15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426716
You
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: barry-util
The current version in all the repo's [1] is 0.14. This version doesn't
have the required bjavaloader binary file in order to install blackberry
applications on to a device. This feature was added in 0.15 of the
package [2].
Currently they
Public bug reported:
uname -a
Linux 16cpt-drubin 2.6.28-13-generic #44-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 2 07:55:09 UTC 2009
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Description:Ubuntu 9.04
Release:9.04
I can't give the rss feed location since it is an internal rss feed that
requires basic authentication. The url isn't
This bug also affects me. (I noticed that a patch was released a while
ago so I must be running that)
$ uname -a
Linux 16cpt-drubin 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:58:03 UTC
2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
It affects this device
Bus 003 Device 003: ID 0a5c:200a Broadcom Corp. Bluetooth
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: weechat
- weechat suddenly crash when receiving a certain color code, like ^Y999.
+ weechat suddenly crash when receiving a certain color code, like (Key code
removed since not Relavent, and malicious users are using it to crash Weechat)
I
This has been patched in the upstream Debian. http://lists.debian.org
/debian-security-announce/2009/msg00054.html
Is there a way to sync it downstream again?
--
crash when receiving a certain color code
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342790
You received this bug notification because you are
Public bug reported:
The flash location
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz
is no longer valid URL on adobes servers.
First part of this bug is that the installer doesn't pick up the HTTP
request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
As a follow up I think this system of pulling the tar.gz file direct
from the adobe website is a bad idea. Is it against the TOS to copy that
file to ubuntu mirrors?
--
Adobe have moved the flash download location.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334276
You received this bug notification because
I forgot to link to the new latest version of flash as it might save
time.
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz
--
Adobe have moved the flash download location.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334276
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
I would suggest the similarly with the way we alias rm with `rm -i` we
either change the usermod to give warning before removing all the users
groups since this is an issue that can't be undone.
I my self almost removed my self from the admin group because of
forgetting the
** Description changed:
I would suggest the similarly with the way we alias rm with `rm -i` we
either change the usermod to give warning before removing all the users
groups since this is an issue that can't be undone.
I my self almost removed my self from the admin group because of
37 matches
Mail list logo
