Confirming that it’s fixed on the same machine with 550.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061079
Title:
GTK-ngl (new default backend) rendering issues with the nvidia 470
driver
To
Public bug reported:
With nvidia driver, all GTK4 applications have label rendering issues.
They are not refresh until passing the cursor over them, giving blank
windows. The corner are white and not themed. Passing from one app scren
to another one reproduces the issue.
gnome-control-center or
** Summary changed:
- Update authd to current version
+ [FFe] Update authd to current version
** Description changed:
Authd is a new package in noble, in universe.
This package is not shipped by default, we made many improvements and
fixes in the current version. We don’t plan to seed
** Summary changed:
- Update and seed wsl-pro-service in the WSL images
+ [FFe] Update and seed wsl-pro-service in the WSL images
** Description changed:
This is a new package for this release. It’s only functional with a
Windows agent which is not publically released and under beta for
Public bug reported:
This is a new package for this release. It’s only functional with a
Windows agent which is not publically released and under beta for now.
As the end of the beta will be after the 24.04 release, we want to get
as close as possible to the current code level, knowing that
Public bug reported:
Authd is a new package in noble, in universe.
This package is not shipped by default, we made many improvements and
fixes in the current version. We don’t plan to seed it this release,
despite the MIR being approved.
Update contains a lot of vendoring updates, and code
Public bug reported:
Tested with 124-1ubuntu1 on noble
1. Create 3 users on the machine:
- sudo-user1, part of sudo group
- sudo-user2, part of sudo group
- normal-user, not part of the sudo group
2. Login with normal-user
3. Try to execute pkexec or any other command prompting for polkit
->
With this in light (but we have the wider "everything that is in main
for a very long time in ubuntu, even being security reviewed and got
multiple uploads), I would agree that -server could have another
security/fresh look. Do you think it’s something the security team has
the capacity to look?
Confirming that the only REQUIRED TODO is now fixed. Thanks for checking
it slyon!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004442
Title:
[MIR] aom (dependency of libheif)
To manage
Hey everyone and Paul. First, sorry for the delayed answered (I was
thinking you would get me reassign and for some reason, I missed
subscribing to the bug)
> But I do not really understand the harm of having these entries kept
for documentation, except this could pile up and become a mess at
I continued exploring this topic myself last week and was able to rely
on a tool developed for this: https://github.com/coreos/cargo-vendor-
filterer/.
This tool is not ideal in the sense that:
- it vendorize the whole content
- then, it filters by replacing entire crates based on some filtering
on present, but none needed for this case
Problems:
- Some usage of setuid, but ok as this is not in the -client package but
-server.
** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) => (unassigned)
We agreed during the MIR meeting that a generic tooling as part of
debhelper would be the best way, didn’t we?
See my arguments above different upstream policies in different source
packages, where if we start introducing this in a per-package base, that
would create divergences between projects.
: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: wireplumber (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949776
Title:
[MIR] wireplumber
To
that you link here a global "pipewire" test plan which is
exercising all those related components together.
** Changed in: wireplumber (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: wireplumber (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => Sebastien Bacher (seb128)
kit, seed or libgoa-*
- part of the UI, desktop file is ok
- translation present
** Changed in: gnome-console (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: gnome-console (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => Jeremy Bicha (jbicha)
--
You received this bug notificatio
** Changed in: zsys (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875767
Title:
When operating install/removal with apt, zed flo
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867007
Title:
zfs-initramfs fails with multiple rpool on separ
to the desktop team to track that and act on it in in
case the transition is not fully done before the next LTS.
** Changed in: libsoup3 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: libsoup3 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
--
You re
I haven’t done a full review from scratch as this is a soname bump, but
seeing the upstream and packaging changes since the bump, this looks
good to me.
I’m going to bring that in the MIR team meeting (in particular security)
about maintaining potentially 2 libsoup versions in main for one
After a reread, I have nothing to add compared to what Christian
mentioned :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973784
Title:
[MIR] libldac
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Changed in: wireplumber (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949776
Title:
[MIR] wireplumber
To manage notificati
** Changed in: libsoup3 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972153
Title:
[MIR] libsoup3
To manage notifications ab
** Changed in: gnome-console (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973828
Title:
[MIR] gnome-console
To man
, see above for security review
** Changed in: wpebackend-fdo (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
You can check if /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/WSLInterop exists and consider
that you are running on WSL if so. Do you plan on doing the change on
release-upgrader?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: libsoup3 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972153
Title:
[MIR] libsoup3
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
15:08:34 jbicha | didrocks: oh I added libsoup-3.0-dev to Extra-Exclude
last week
15:09:48 jbicha | so sysprof wouldn't be pulled in to main currently
** Changed in: libsoup3 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because
16:28:42 seb128 | didrocks, it probably requires discussion because jbicha
said he doesn't believe we will be able to demote libsoup2, so it means we are
asking to have 2 versions in main
16:28:55 seb128 | so we should probably focus the MIR on that aspect
** Changed in: wpebackend-fdo (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973033
Title:
[MIR] wpebackend-fdo
To man
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973745
Title:
adsys windows admx/adml lts only does not include
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973751
Title:
Machines or Users scripts are not executed
To manage
** Also affects: adsys (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973752
Title:
Fix privilege permission which can not be set to
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Disallowing local administrator does not work as excepted:
- on some AD server, setting in the UI this key (and some other similars) to
disabled, go to next GPO rule, then back to this one, AD will display the key
as enabled.
- on the client machine, we can see
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Machine and user scripts are not executed on startup/shutdown/login/logoff.
/run has been recently changed to be noexec on jammy. Ensure that we can
execute the scripts in /run/adsys subdirectories. The scripts mecanism has been
reviewed by the security team, so we
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Changing any gsettings key in AD resulted in user databases under /etc/dconf,
owned by root, with 0600 as permissions. This change was done late in the cycle
after passing some permissions checkers to harden the binaries.
However, in that case, the user databases
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Due to some misunterpretation in how the launchpad API works when listing lts
only, 22.04 was not included there by the admx/adml files generated by CI.
Consequently, when those files are deployed on Windows AD server with LTS only
templates, this one is not
explanation on recommended TODOs as this
one is small.
** Changed in: gnome-text-editor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: gnome-text-editor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I’ll review the rest on the MIR, but to not add more delay, I think we
should discuss this:
> "- The package does not run an autopkgtest because desktop softwares
aren't easy to test in autopkgtest. THe situation isn't a regression
compared to gedit which we want ro replace. While it would be
Public bug reported:
Needs to be MIR.
What doesn’t qualify for immediate promotion (soname bump) is the dep on
sysprof which is in universe and needs to be checked (either get it
promoted or downgrading the dep)
** Affects: libsoup3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Sebastien
+1 from the MIR team perspective, this is a simple rename, and we have a
team subscribed to it.
** Changed in: mesa-amber (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: mesa-amber (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967086
Title:
MIR: mesa-amber
To manage notifications ab
$ ./change-override -c main -B adsys
Override component to main
adsys 0.8.2 in jammy: universe/admin -> main
adsys 0.8.2 in jammy amd64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
adsys 0.8.2 in jammy arm64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
adsys 0.8.2 in jammy armhf: universe/admin/optional/100% ->
$ ./change-override -s jammy -c main -S libadwaita-1
Override component to main
libadwaita-1 1.1~rc-1 in jammy: universe/misc -> main
gir1.2-adw-1 1.1~rc-1 in jammy amd64: universe/introspection/optional/100% ->
main
gir1.2-adw-1 1.1~rc-1 in jammy arm64: universe/introspection/optional/100% ->
Review for Package: libadwaita-1
[Summary]
MIR team ACK. To me, it doesn’t seem this needs a security review. It’s well
maintained, part of the core GNOME stack now. Desktop packages is already
subscribed.
Notes:
TODO: - add todos, issues or special cases to discuss
Required TODOs:
TODO: - TBD
** Changed in: adsys (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961459
Title:
adsys pam issues
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
For reference, fixed in https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/289. Thanks
Michael for the initial work on this!
** Changed in: adsys (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The flaky test on armhf is fixed by https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/292
(couldn’t retrigger the flakyness after multiple builds in ppa with this patch)
The ppcel64 issue, introduced by new samba is workarounded in
https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/295
** Changed in: adsys (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: libadwaita-1 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962568
Title:
[MIR] libadwaita-1
To manage notificati
** Changed in: plocate (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: Canonical Security Team (canonical-security) => Ubuntu Security
Team (ubuntu-security)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960864
** Patch added: "wsl-systemd.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/+bug/1962556/+attachment/5564418/+files/wsl-systemd.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
WSL on Ubuntu 22.04 has a strecth goal to ship systemd experimental support.
This relies on 3 changes:
- a script started up on WSL VM boot, which is shipped as part of this package
to start systemd in its own namespace.
- a change in the ubuntu Windows launcher executable,
Hum, it seems your patch makes sense and should work on most arch. I saw
Michael did an upload with this:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.8ubuntu1
But it’s failing only on ppcel64:
Hum, it seems your patch makes sense and should work on most arch. I saw
Michael did an upload with this:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.8ubuntu1
But it’s failing only on ppcel64:
Thanks Seth for the review and the overall positive comments! :)
Some answers:
1. the potential race is fixed after our discussion and pending some reviews
2. the pam modulefixes are done and merged already (even if upstream
don’t deallocate, let’s do it on our side)
3. on the conditions that
Uptream informed us that the initial MIR description wrongly that there
are no sgid binaries, but /usr/bin/plocate is sgid plocate.
I think this warrant then a security review.
@enr0n: do you need for this LTS release? If so, please target it to mention
that to the security team.
If the
Ah, thanks! Lurking there and will shamelessly copy what they decide to
do! :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961459
Title:
adsys pam issues
To manage notifications about this bug
Seems this is not enough and it’s again in the graph:
o suitesparse-graphblas: libgraphblas-dev libgraphblas-doc libgraphblas6
[Reverse-Depends: Rescued from suitesparse-graphblas, libgraphblas-dev]
[Reverse-Recommends: libsuitesparse-dev]
Seb, if you have some spare cycle, mind having
This is still appearing on the component mismatch list. Seb, do you mind having
another look?
o glade: gir1.2-gladeui-2.0 libgladeui-2-13 libgladeui-common libgladeui-dev
libgladeui-doc
MIR: #1961023 (Fix Released) [MIR] glade
[Reverse-Depends: Rescued from glade, libgladeui-2-13,
ged in: plocate (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: plocate (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Public bug reported:
Either glade should be promoted or libhandy should remove the dep.
TBD
** Affects: glade (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
** Tags: jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
TBD
** Affects: libxcvt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
Status: Incomplete
** Tags: jammy
** Changed in: libxcvt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
--
You received this bug notification
but given the usage not being the finale user, this
is ok.
Problems:
- There are a lot of warnings during the package build due to vendored
dependencies. Are those logged/worked on upstream?
** Changed in: cargo (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => Simon Chopin (schop
Hey Łukasz! Thanks for accepting it!
impish has a version of adsys. This is an entreprise feature and I doubt we
have users there, as by default, this is hilighted for LTSes only.
Functionality-wise, as there is no ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon, this is
equivalent to the version already
Hey Łukasz! Thanks for accepting it!
impish has a version of adsys. This is an entreprise feature and I doubt we
have users there, as by default, this is hilighted for LTSes only.
Functionality-wise, as there is no ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon, this is
equivalent to the version already
Thanks Łukasz! This is now in focal NEW. I think this could be accepted,
migrate to update even and then, we can think about promoting it to main
once #1936907 is approved. What do you think?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
The source package was not promoted. Doing so now:
Override component to main
ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon 1.6 in jammy: universe/misc -> main
Override [y|N]? y
1 publication overridden.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Yeah, I don’t think that worths a delta. My general annoyance with this
is that when you start having some warnings/errors in a project during
build, you start accepting more and more of them until it’s not readable
and you miss a valid concern. This is why, I tend to patch and add
either linter
[Summary]
Thanks a lot Andreas for the detailed and high quality MIR, with
relevant researches and background information.
I was first tempted to diff between quagga and frr to do a quick
assessement. However, there are too many differences to avoid doing a
full package checks. Here are my
** Changed in: frr (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Didier Roche (didrocks)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951834
Title:
[MIR]: frr
To manage notifications about this bug
(Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: libset-intspan-perl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956444
** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Override component to main
fwupd-unsigned 1:1.1-3 in jammy amd64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
fwupd-unsigned 1:1.1-3 in jammy arm64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
fwupd-unsigned 1:1.1-3 in jammy armhf: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
fwupd-unsigned-dev 1:1.1-3 in jammy amd64:
Review for Package: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome
[Summary]
MIR team ack from my standpoint. Just a recommended TODO that will be great to
look at, but not a blocker.
Recommended TODOs:
- There are a number of deprecation and compiler warnings. Mind reporting them
upstream and check if any could
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => Sebastien Bacher (seb128)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956949
Title:
CPC AWS jammy builds fail with: &qu
Excellent, thanks @waveform! MIR team ack. Promoting it right away as
pillow is trying to pull it already.
** Changed in: raqm (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
raqm 0.7.0-4ubuntu1 in jammy: universe/misc -> main
libraqm-dev 0.7.0-4ubuntu1 in jammy amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% ->
main
libraqm-dev 0.7.0-4ubuntu1 in jammy arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% ->
main
libraqm-dev 0.7.0-4ubuntu1 in jammy armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% ->
Public bug reported:
Opening a placeholder MIR for now until seb has some time to look at it and
decide on a strategy:
- either removing the recommends on suitesparse
- or handle this MIR.
** Affects: suitesparse-graphblas (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Sebastien Bacher
ack, keep me posted once the autopkgtests are uploaded and I’m happy to
ack the MIR :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951069
Title:
[MIR] raqm
To manage notifications about this
Sorry for the delayed response, but EOY holidays and such :)
Ack on the new versions. If you can see if we should backport some of
the fixes in 0.7.2, I will let that to you…
On the autopkgtests, the question is how to protect raqm from it’s
dependencies. If a dependency is changing, then only
As discussed together, this will be reviewed post-christmas (letting
this for the MIR team on next weekly meeting)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953197
Title:
[MIR]
Indeed, thanks for tracking it here. MIR ack then.
** Changed in: pipewire-media-session (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: pipewire-media-session (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification becau
Ack on the testplan. The remaining part is some comments on the
recommended TODO.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952924
Title:
[MIR] pipewire-media-session
To manage notifications
.
** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
media-session (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: pipewire-media-session (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
xReview for Package: raqm
[Summary]
MIR team ACK, under the constraint that the autopktests possible enhancements
are a little bit more explored (see below) and that check (I didn’t see any
rationale in the request) on why raqm hasn’t been updated despite having new
releases for a year now.
I unsuscribed the MIR team so that we can revisit it all once we are
wanting to promote it to main again and review it. Once this is the
case, please resuscribe, update any needed information and set the bug
report state back to New.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
With the additional DEP-8 tests and as xnox says, better integration
with our default units, I do not think the duplication is harmful (apart
from the extra maintainance on us) compared to what most users will do:
google/look on stackoverflow and use a semi-official (due to wg being in
the kernel)
Review for Package: wireplumber
[Summary]
- The essence of the review result from the MIR POV
MIR team ACK constrained to an answer or fix to the questions below.
Required TODOs:
- There is no autopkgtests here and there is no statement on why they can’t be
included. Can you investigate aroud
This is fine with me with the recent discussions after a new quick
check, approving from MIR team perspective.
** Changed in: libportal (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
** Affects: wireplumber (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Sebastien Bacher (seb128)
Status: Incomplete
** Tags: jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Indeed, as the snapshot is not done with ZSys, USERDATA has not been
snapshotted and will not be reverted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949490
Title:
Grub doesn’t fully revert ZFS
$ ./change-override -c main -S wsl-setup
Override component to main
wsl-setup 0.1.1 in jammy: universe/admin -> main
wsl-setup 0.1.1 in jammy amd64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
wsl-setup 0.1.1 in jammy arm64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
wsl-setup 0.1.1 in jammy armhf:
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+merge/411011
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926267
Thanks Lukas for the review!
- https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsl-setup/0.1.1 is now uploaded with the
fix for the libexec path, thanks for spotting it!
- desktop-packages is now subscribed to the package.
On automated testing, as said, this is a 22.04 LTS goal. Right now, the
tests are
Public bug reported:
[Availability]
Built for all supported architectures. starting from jammy. It is a
simple arch-independent package.
[Rationale]
On WSL, we have an out of the box experience UI. This one is based on
ubuntu-desktop-installer (which includes subiquity) on a classic snap.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1929038 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929038
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1929038
[SRU] Backport to 20.04 LTS
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
* Active Directory GPO support is a feature that we developed in impish. We
have some customers asking for a backport on our current LTS release. This is a
new feature which goes hands in hands with MIRing ADsys. See
The issue is in zfs-linux, where the merge from debian
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/535966758/zfs-
linux_2.0.2-1ubuntu5_2.0.3-8ubuntu1.diff.gz once again reverted some of
the fixes and rolled back the patch to an earlier version. The fix was
already reverted erronously in hirsute during the
Actually, I got caught by "imported_pools_ vs "all_pools". So yeah, this
is expected (this list is to cleanup, removing any temporary imported
pool by the script to list all systems available on grub).
The issues is below, (I don’t have time to debug it fully right now), but in
this part of set
1 - 100 of 14896 matches
Mail list logo
