** Description changed:
[context]
ADSys is a tool designed for administering and implementing Group Policy
Objects (GPOs) from Active Directory on Linux systems. It includes a suite of
services and commands that empower administrators to efficiently manage policy
updates and maintain
** Description changed:
[context]
ADSys is a tool designed for administering and implementing Group Policy
Objects (GPOs) from Active Directory on Linux systems. It includes a suite of
services and commands that empower administrators to efficiently manage policy
updates and maintain
** Description changed:
As part of our entreprise desktop offering, there is the request to
backport ubuntu-proxy-manager to 22.04 LTS. The package is in universe
for now.
Ubuntu Proxy Manager is a D-Bus mediated service intended to be
triggered by ADSys, our Active Directory GPO
** Changed in: python-cepces (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => New
** Changed in: python-requests-gssapi (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => New
** Also affects: python-requests-gssapi (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: python-cepces (Ubuntu
** Changed in: ubuntu-proxy-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => New
** Also affects: ubuntu-proxy-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-proxy-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: golang-1.22 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Description changed:
[context]
ADSys is a tool designed for administering and implementing Group Policy
Objects (GPOs) from Active Directory on Linux systems. It includes a suite of
services and commands that empower
The issue had been identified to be in GDM.
** Package changed: authd (Ubuntu) => gdm3 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061850
Title:
Can't authenticate in TTY after
We decided to remove the authd package in noble for the time being.
The current implementation (in particular the one in the PAM module) is
not up to our standard in terms of quality and what we are confortable
to support in the long term. Rather than releasing as is and having
risky SRUs in the
Removing packages from noble:
authd 0.2.1 in noble
authd 0.2.1 in noble amd64
authd 0.2.1 in noble arm64
authd 0.2.1 in noble armhf
authd 0.2.1 in noble ppc64el
authd 0.2.1 in noble riscv64
We decided to remove the authd package in noble for the time being.
The current implementation (in particular the one in the PAM module) is
not up to our standard in terms of quality and what we are confortable
to support in the long term. Rather than releasing as is and having
risky SRUs in the
The last security request (having per user certificate to secure the
gRPC communication so that they can’t be hijacked cross-users) is now
addressed with 0.1.4 with many other enhancements fixing some
recommended TODOs.
I’m proceeding thus with the promotion.
** Changed in: wsl-pro-service
yeah, informing the user will go a long way IMHO!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062133
Title:
Migration to the snap issues
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
After migrating to the snap, I noticed the following:
- the launcher icon disappeared (I guess it’s because the .desktop file is now
"thunderbird_thunderbird.desktop"
- the snap migration took a good 5 minutes on my machine (I guess it’s the copy
of the email folder),
Confirming that it’s fixed on the same machine with 550.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061079
Title:
GTK-ngl (new default backend) rendering issues with the nvidia 470
driver
To
Public bug reported:
With nvidia driver, all GTK4 applications have label rendering issues.
They are not refresh until passing the cursor over them, giving blank
windows. The corner are white and not themed. Passing from one app scren
to another one reproduces the issue.
gnome-control-center or
** Summary changed:
- Update authd to current version
+ [FFe] Update authd to current version
** Description changed:
Authd is a new package in noble, in universe.
This package is not shipped by default, we made many improvements and
fixes in the current version. We don’t plan to seed
** Summary changed:
- Update and seed wsl-pro-service in the WSL images
+ [FFe] Update and seed wsl-pro-service in the WSL images
** Description changed:
This is a new package for this release. It’s only functional with a
Windows agent which is not publically released and under beta for
Public bug reported:
This is a new package for this release. It’s only functional with a
Windows agent which is not publically released and under beta for now.
As the end of the beta will be after the 24.04 release, we want to get
as close as possible to the current code level, knowing that
Public bug reported:
Authd is a new package in noble, in universe.
This package is not shipped by default, we made many improvements and
fixes in the current version. We don’t plan to seed it this release,
despite the MIR being approved.
Update contains a lot of vendoring updates, and code
Public bug reported:
Tested with 124-1ubuntu1 on noble
1. Create 3 users on the machine:
- sudo-user1, part of sudo group
- sudo-user2, part of sudo group
- normal-user, not part of the sudo group
2. Login with normal-user
3. Try to execute pkexec or any other command prompting for polkit
->
With this in light (but we have the wider "everything that is in main
for a very long time in ubuntu, even being security reviewed and got
multiple uploads), I would agree that -server could have another
security/fresh look. Do you think it’s something the security team has
the capacity to look?
Confirming that the only REQUIRED TODO is now fixed. Thanks for checking
it slyon!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004442
Title:
[MIR] aom (dependency of libheif)
To manage
Hey everyone and Paul. First, sorry for the delayed answered (I was
thinking you would get me reassign and for some reason, I missed
subscribing to the bug)
> But I do not really understand the harm of having these entries kept
for documentation, except this could pile up and become a mess at
I continued exploring this topic myself last week and was able to rely
on a tool developed for this: https://github.com/coreos/cargo-vendor-
filterer/.
This tool is not ideal in the sense that:
- it vendorize the whole content
- then, it filters by replacing entire crates based on some filtering
on present, but none needed for this case
Problems:
- Some usage of setuid, but ok as this is not in the -client package but
-server.
** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) => (unassigned)
We agreed during the MIR meeting that a generic tooling as part of
debhelper would be the best way, didn’t we?
See my arguments above different upstream policies in different source
packages, where if we start introducing this in a per-package base, that
would create divergences between projects.
26 matches
Mail list logo
