[Bug 645575] Re: udev rules for mdadm cause boot hangs and md array malfunctions

2016-01-19 Thread Diego Morales
I am not sure if they should be marked as duplicates, but see also
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1335642 .

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645575

Title:
  udev rules for mdadm cause boot hangs and md array malfunctions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/645575/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1335642] Re: mdadm runs into infinite loop and prevents initrd/initramfs phase to finish on boot

2016-01-19 Thread Diego Morales
I came across this while purposely breaking my sw RAID array to test if
booting through the mirror disk or degraded array was OK.

Comment #4 worked for me.

ls /dev/mapper on the initram shell really showed that my root device
(which is on LVM) was not available before running that udevadm command.

There was another catch that took me over an hour: I starting this by
physically removing the sda disk. But later I reinserted it, and keep
debugging like that most of the time, without resyncing the arrays,
'cause I wanted it to come up fine in that state. So I when I ran
update-initramfs only the files in sdb got updated.

*It took me a while to realize that the boot process was reading the
initramfs files from the un-updated re-inserted sda disk.* I then re-
synced my /boot and the workaround (#4) worked, duh.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335642

Title:
  mdadm runs into infinite loop and prevents initrd/initramfs phase to
  finish on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1335642/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1335642] Re: mdadm runs into infinite loop and prevents initrd/initramfs phase to finish on boot

2016-01-19 Thread Diego Morales
Forgot to add that I am using Ubuntu 14.04 on an IBM x3630 M4 hardware.
12.04 apparently didn't manifested this problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335642

Title:
  mdadm runs into infinite loop and prevents initrd/initramfs phase to
  finish on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1335642/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1278193] Re: logrotate skip the rotation of many files under /var/log due to bad group ownership

2014-10-27 Thread Diego Morales
I've went through this problem just now. The changes described in #5
solved the problem for me as well.

The fix released in LP: #1258202 (logrotate version 3.8.6-1ubuntu2) adds
those lines to the default logrotate.conf file, but I got some custom
configs in mine and so I had to manually change it.

Of course it only works when it reads logrotate.conf, which I guess is not the 
case when you run this way:
 logrotate -df /etc/logrotate.d/rsyslog

Running either /etc/cron.daily/logrotate or "/usr/sbin/logrotate
/etc/logrotate.conf" works fine. Maybe the config "su root syslog"
should be the compile-time-default in Ubuntu so to avoid this situation.
Don't know if it is possible.

Also, from what I understand reading man logrotate.conf, the "su root
syslog" line only changes the user/group that the process of rotation
will run as, which does not (necessarily) affect the owner and group of
the log files: that is defined by the "create" directive (see the
logrotate.conf man for that directive).  That's why you don't see any
files with group syslog, Uwe.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278193

Title:
  logrotate skip the rotation of many files under /var/log due to bad
  group ownership

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logrotate/+bug/1278193/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1000770] Re: In Ubuntu installer, LVM device nodes are not created in time

2012-11-23 Thread Diego Morales
I've hit this bug even tough I've applied the fix discussed in comment
#6 of bug #964957.

Specifically I've built partman-auto-lvm_42ubuntu2+dannf2_all.udeb from
the 38th revision of https://code.launchpad.net/~dannf/partman-auto-lvm
/precise-fixes, and installed that udeb using an early command. I've
also confimed that /bin/perform_recipe_by_lvm contains the update-dev
--settle line.

It happened for me just as in Sgifford reported, but with swap partition
instead of root. I'm preseeding the partitioning. The workaround he
suggested (running vgscan --mknodes) works for me too.


** Changed in: partman-auto-lvm (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000770

Title:
  In Ubuntu installer, LVM device nodes are not created in time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto-lvm/+bug/1000770/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 859319] Re: preseeded partition attempts to proceed too fast

2012-11-09 Thread Diego Morales
This is probably the same as #964957, isn't it?

Maybe should be marked as duplicate?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859319

Title:
  preseeded partition attempts to proceed too fast

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/859319/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 522509] Re: [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

2012-05-09 Thread Diego Morales
> Also why does service say it is running when it isn't?
Yeah, I saw the same thing. Didn't investigate it enough to make any comments.

> Anything else I can try to make tftpd-hpa work from boot?
Maybe starting tftpd as an "up" line on the interface definition
(/etc/network/interface, man interfaces for more info).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522509

Title:
  [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ltsp/+bug/522509/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 522509] Re: [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

2012-05-07 Thread Diego Morales
Hello Allen,

As you may already know, the tftpd-hpa daemon is started on boot by the
upstart system, as configured in the file /etc/init/tftpd-hpa.conf.
This file contains a line beggining with "start on", which gives the
*condition* in which upstart will start the daemon (by running the
script that is defined in the same file).

The error message "cannot resolve local IPv4 bind address: 0.0.0.0, Name
or service not known" tells us that there is no configured IP address
when tftpd is started.

In my case, that happened  because of the NIC bonding (multiple physical
NICs configured as one logical NIC) configuration. The original "start
on" condition (on lucid) is "start on (filesystem and net-device-up
IFACE!=lo)". So when bondX gets up, that condition is satisfied, tftpd
starts, but all the physical interfaces which are part of bondX are not
ready yet, which gives the error, and makes tftpd exit. I changed the
condition (in a non-generic, not even good way)  so tftpd gets started
later. It worked

Do you use nic bonding  too?

I've just checked now that in Precise they changed the condition to
"start on runlevel [2345]". I guess that should work even with bonding,
don't remember if I tried that... Could it be another network
configuration problem in your setup, maybe?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522509

Title:
  [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ltsp/+bug/522509/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 522509] Re: [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

2011-06-15 Thread Diego Morales
I have the same problem, using lucid latest package (5.0-11ubuntu2.1).

I have many interfaces configured in this machine, and nic bonding
configured. Upstart seems to raise tftp when the first bond interface
starts:

syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  kernel: [3.923760] bnx2: eth1: using 
MSI
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  kernel: [3.924441] bonding: bond0: 
Warning: failed to get speed and duplex from eth1, assumed to be 100Mb/sec and 
Full.
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  kernel: [3.924451] bonding: bond0: 
enslaving eth1 as an active interface with an up link.
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  kernel: [3.925317] bonding: bond0: 
setting mode to 802.3ad (4).
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  kernel: [3.925348] bonding: bond0: 
Setting MII monitoring interval to 100.
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  kernel: [3.925395] bonding: bond0: 
Setting LACP rate to fast (1).
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  in.tftpd[842]: cannot resolve local IPv4 
bind address: 0.0.0.0, Name or service not known
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  init: tftpd-hpa main process (842) 
terminated with status 66
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  init: tftpd-hpa main process ended, 
respawning
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  kernel: [4.129433] 802.1Q VLAN 
Support v1.8 Ben Greear 
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  kernel: [4.129436] All bugs added by 
David S. Miller 
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  kernel: [4.134009] bonding: bond0: 
link status definitely down for interface eth0, disabling it
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  kernel: [4.134012] bonding: Warning: 
bond0: link status changed for uninitialized port on eth0
syslog.2.gz:Jun 13 14:17:02  kernel: [4.134017] bonding: bond0: 
now running without any active interface !

The "status tftpd-hpa" says the job is running, when it's not (should
THAT happen?). stop/start raises the program just fine.

I tried to change the condition to "(filesystem  and and started
networking)", but that seems to start it even earlier. I've changed it
to "(filesystem and net-device-up IFACE=bond0.80)" (bond0.80 is the last
bond interface) and then it worked.

But the problem may actually be that bondX is !=lo, and it may come up before 
any of its slaves be available, resulting in the 
"cannot resolve local IPv4 bind address: 0.0.0.0" error.

Should I open a new bug? If so, should it be on tftpd-hpa, or some other
package?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522509

Title:
  [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ltsp/+bug/522509/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 153623] Re: bootsplash ubuntu gusty RC with mobility radeon x700

2008-03-12 Thread Diego Morales
I was having the same problem in my laptop (Dell 131L with radeon xpress
1100, widescreen display). I've solved it by correcting the resolution
in the /etc/usplash.conf file and running  "sudo update-initramfs -u -k
`uname -r`".

The resolution was wrong: 1280x1024 while the native for my display is
1280x800.

-- 
bootsplash ubuntu gusty RC with mobility radeon x700
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153623
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs