[Bug 1641380] Re: chromium-browser: ERR_CERTIFICATE_TRANSPARENCY_REQUIRED for Symantec certs
Thawte certificates are not accepted: https://life.ru -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641380 Title: chromium-browser: ERR_CERTIFICATE_TRANSPARENCY_REQUIRED for Symantec certs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1641380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1608076] Re: do-release-upgrade from 14.04 LTS to 16.04 LTS failed
Fixed by latest update. Possibly xorg update resolve this. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1608076 Title: do-release-upgrade from 14.04 LTS to 16.04 LTS failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1608076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1608076] [NEW] do-release-upgrade from 14.04 LTS to 16.04 LTS failed
Public bug reported: Package manager cannot resolve broken packages (see attachments) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:0.220.8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-34.53~14.04.1-generic 4.4.15 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-34-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.21 Architecture: i386 CrashDB: ubuntu CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Sat Jul 30 17:58:00 2016 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-08-22 (1437 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120423) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2016-07-30 (0 days ago) ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug dist-upgrade i386 trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1608076 Title: do-release-upgrade from 14.04 LTS to 16.04 LTS failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1608076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1110138] Re: Unity: wrong window dimensions / location in Java applications
After applying this patch to Ubuntu 12.04 Compiz 0.9.7, there was a regression in the JFrame windows without decorations. Screenshot in attachment, the sample code here: http://www.java2s.com/Tutorial/Java/0240__Swing/SpecifyingWindowDecorations.htm ** Attachment added: Decoration bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1110138/+attachment/3647414/+files/decoration.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110138 Title: Unity: wrong window dimensions / location in Java applications To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1110138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874146] Re: New windows open on the wrong monitor, Place Plugin settings silently ignored
I can confirm the behavior described in #31, 33 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874146 Title: New windows open on the wrong monitor, Place Plugin settings silently ignored To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/874146/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657048] Re: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch
The package in the release of Ubuntu 12.04 LTS still has this bug. Check out my patch. ** Patch added: Patch to /usr/bin/jvisualvm script https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/657048/+attachment/3163376/+files/jvisualvm.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657048 Title: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/657048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657048] Re: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch
** Patch removed: Patch to /usr/bin/jvisualvm script https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/657048/+attachment/3163376/+files/jvisualvm.diff ** Patch added: Patch to /usr/bin/jvisualvm script https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/657048/+attachment/3163566/+files/jvisualvm.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657048 Title: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/657048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657048] Re: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657048 Title: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/657048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657048] Re: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch
** Patch added: Patch to /usr/bin/jvisualvm script https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/657048/+attachment/3163581/+files/jvisualvm.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657048 Title: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/657048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657048] Re: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch
** Patch removed: Patch to /usr/bin/jvisualvm script https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/657048/+attachment/3163566/+files/jvisualvm.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657048 Title: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/657048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 136947] Re: no longer honors X11 forwarding
Another way to get to work with disabled ipv6 add one option in the sshd configuration: AddressFamily inet -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136947 Title: no longer honors X11 forwarding To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/136947/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 136947] Re: no longer honors X11 forwarding
Another way to get to work with disabled ipv6 add one option in the sshd configuration: AddressFamily inet -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136947 Title: no longer honors X11 forwarding To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/136947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 586528] Re: keyboard doesn't work after screensaver shuts down the monitor
For me too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586528 Title: keyboard doesn't work after screensaver shuts down the monitor -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689886] Re: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689886 Title: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689886] Re: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation
This bug is also affected to linux- image-2.6.37-020637-generic_2.6.37-020637.201101050908_i386 ** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689886 Title: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 677443] Re: Error while tracing: No such file or directory
Kernel from this ppa does not support ureadahead. You must patch kernel manually with supplied patches from the readahead tarball and enable config option at Kernel hacking - Tracers - Support for tracing block io actions ** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677443 Title: Error while tracing: No such file or directory -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689886] Re: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation
Patch has been committed to net-next-2.6 tree at upstream git. Commit bc2ce894e113ed95b92541134b002fdc641e8080 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689886 Title: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689886] [NEW] Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation
Public bug reported: First, sorry for my bad english. The issue is that Linux-based OS sometimes can't make an tcp connection to some Windows servers with switched on buggy implementation of rfc1323, that described on this forum: http://www.network-builders.com /windows-tcp-timestamp-not-compliant-rfc-1323-a-t80898.html. Because some Windows hosts implementation of rfc1323 bases on randomly generated TSval and sent first value of TSval as 0, the difference of recent and new TSval sometimes has been affected by a sign magic issue and the PAWS mechanism has been triggered. Anyway, the rfc1323 has discribes the condition of PAWS as 0 (t - s) 2**31, that has been right implementation in current linux kernel, but incompatible with Windows bug. For example, the one of affected to this issue Windows host is behind relay.n-l-e.ru:80. Note that problems arise only when the remote side sets the TC val 2147483647, ie when there is a sign. I think that my small patch makes the kernel more compatible with this windows bug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: linux-image-2.6.35-23-generic 2.6.35-23.41 Regression: No Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.41-generic 2.6.35.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23. Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: mamon 1517 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] Нет такого файла или каталога Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'M5455'/'ALi M5455 with ALC650F at irq 5' Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC650F' Components : 'AC97a:414c4723' Controls : 50 Simple ctrls : 33 Date: Tue Dec 14 00:18:01 2010 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=f28c073c-7dd9-4573-8f91-57125983e611 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) IwConfig: lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. vboxnet0 no wireless extensions. Lsusb: Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub MachineType: Infomash RoverBook PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available Socket 1: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card Socket 1: no card ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-23-generic root=UUID=3d272a1f-0cf1-4199-a703-982610a611cc ro quiet splash nomodeset ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=ru_RU.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.38 RfKill: SourcePackage: linux WifiSyslog: Dec 13 23:53:18 mamon-laptop kernel: [ 1611.597048] warning: `VirtualBox' uses 32-bit capabilities (legacy support in use) Dec 14 00:10:38 mamon-laptop kernel: [ 2651.203411] lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions dmi.bios.date: 07/18/03 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD dmi.bios.version: 4.06 dmi.board.name: QID2000 dmi.board.vendor: MEDIONNB dmi.board.version: Rev.A dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: MEDIONNB dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvr4.06:bd07/18/03:svnInfomash:pnRoverBook:pvr0106:rvnMEDIONNB:rnQID2000:rvrRev.A:cvnMEDIONNB:ct10:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: RoverBook dmi.product.version: 0106 dmi.sys.vendor: Infomash ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 kernel-net maverick needs-upstream-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689886 Title: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689886] Re: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation
** Patch added: ugly-windows-rfc1323.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689886/+attachment/1765107/+files/ugly-windows-rfc1323.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689886 Title: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689886] Re: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation
tcpdump capture: 23:40:52.726909 IP 213.141.147.8.33778 212.176.201.162.80: Flags [S], seq 1116163452, win 5840, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 141403 ecr 0,nop,wscale 6], length 0 23:40:52.737227 IP 212.176.201.162.80 213.141.147.8.33778: Flags [S.], seq 4019723831, ack 1116163453, win 16384, options [mss 1360,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,TS val 0 ecr 0,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 23:40:52.737392 IP 213.141.147.8.33778 212.176.201.162.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 92, options [nop,nop,TS val 141405 ecr 0], length 0 23:40:52.737926 IP 213.141.147.8.33778 212.176.201.162.80: Flags [P.], seq 1:113, ack 1, win 92, options [nop,nop,TS val 141405 ecr 0], length 112 23:40:52.749101 IP 212.176.201.162.80 213.141.147.8.33778: Flags [P.], seq 1:415, ack 113, win 65423, options [nop,nop,TS val 3503477357 ecr 141403], length 414 23:40:52.749219 IP 213.141.147.8.33778 212.176.201.162.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 92, options [nop,nop,TS val 141408 ecr 0], length 0 23:40:53.002253 IP 213.141.147.8.33778 212.176.201.162.80: Flags [P.], seq 1:113, ack 1, win 92, options [nop,nop,TS val 141472 ecr 0], length 112 23:40:53.012252 IP 212.176.201.162.80 213.141.147.8.33778: Flags [P.], ack 113, win 65423, options [nop,nop,TS val 0 ecr 141408], length 0 23:40:55.665916 IP 212.176.201.162.80 213.141.147.8.33778: Flags [P.], seq 1:415, ack 113, win 65423, options [nop,nop,TS val 3503477387 ecr 141408], length 414 23:40:55.666023 IP 213.141.147.8.33778 212.176.201.162.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 92, options [nop,nop,TS val 142137 ecr 0], length 0 23:40:55.676963 IP 212.176.201.162.80 213.141.147.8.33778: Flags [P.], seq 1:415, ack 113, win 65423, options [nop,nop,TS val 3503477387 ecr 142137], length 414 23:40:55.677007 IP 213.141.147.8.33778 212.176.201.162.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 92, options [nop,nop,TS val 142140 ecr 0], length 0 23:41:01.683646 IP 212.176.201.162.80 213.141.147.8.33778: Flags [P.], seq 1:415, ack 113, win 65423, options [nop,nop,TS val 3503477447 ecr 142140], length 414 23:41:01.683752 IP 213.141.147.8.33778 212.176.201.162.80: Flags [.], ack 1, win 92, options [nop,nop,TS val 143642 ecr 0], length 0 ** Attachment added: An capture of tcp sesssion in libpcap format https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/689886/+attachment/1765125/+files/ugly-windows-rfc1323.pcap ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #24842 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24842 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689886 Title: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689886] Re: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation
I also opened this issue on upstream bugtracker: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24842 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689886 Title: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689886] Re: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation
** Patch removed: ugly-windows-rfc1323.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/689886/+attachment/1765107/+files/ugly-windows-rfc1323.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689886 Title: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689886] Re: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation
My earlier patch is not correct. Eric Dumazet in the maillist suggested the correct version of the patch. ** Patch added: ugly-windows-rfc1323.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/689886/+attachment/1765282/+files/ugly-windows-rfc1323.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689886 Title: Compatibility issue with uggly Windows RFC1323 implementation -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
