[Bug 883319]
Would also like to confirm that Chris Bagwell's patch works for me. I'm using 1.11.4 from Debian Sid and the patch didn't apply cleanly (whitespace issue and started at 297 instead of 282), but after I fixed that it works like a charm. Been missing this feature for a while :) Thanks Crhis! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883319 Title: xrandr --scale restricts area in which mouse moves To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/883319/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 881046]
Would also like to confirm that Chris Bagwell's patch works for me. I'm using 1.11.4 from Debian Sid and the patch didn't apply cleanly (whitespace issue and started at 297 instead of 282), but after I fixed that it works like a charm. Been missing this feature for a while :) Thanks Crhis! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881046 Title: Panning in a virtual monitor is not possible after upgrade to Ubuntu 11.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/881046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 880010] Re: Empty space in tray after every suspend.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 846878 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846878 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 846878 empty space between time applet and nm-applet -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880010 Title: Empty space in tray after every suspend. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxpanel/+bug/880010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 846878] Re: empty space between time applet and nm-applet
Shouldn't the comments be merged somehow when bugs are marked as duplicates? I'm hoping this will also be sent to people over at #880010. @bazonbloch: There is on my install. See the screenshot. @pcroque: I can confirm this works. I don't agree on this being a workaround though (I need the battery icon to know when to put in the charger), but it's definitely located the source of the bug. It would also explain why this is laptop-only, since desktops generally don't have batteries to run off of. ** Attachment added: Location of never show option in xfce4-power-manager-settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxpanel/+bug/846878/+attachment/2577567/+files/2011-10-29-104039_1024x600_scrot.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846878 Title: empty space between time applet and nm-applet To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxpanel/+bug/846878/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 846878] Re: empty space between time applet and nm-applet
I just did a couple of suspend-wakeup cycles and don't notice an immediate effect. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846878 Title: empty space between time applet and nm-applet To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxpanel/+bug/846878/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 846878] Re: empty space between time applet and nm-applet
The previous set of suspend-wakeup cycles was while my laptop was on the charger (with full battery, so not actually charging). I just did some more cycles when working on battery and now it does increase after suspending. This is 100% reproducible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846878 Title: empty space between time applet and nm-applet To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxpanel/+bug/846878/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:29:21 -, Pako 760...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: @ Erwin Junge How you get your result? ~6 hours in Ubuntu, ~10 in Lubuntu? or ~6 to ~10 in Lubuntu with a different kernel? However, Erwins test shows that there are huge difference in battery time from different desktop environments, thus, you can't get results based on kernel test only, because it's just a fraction from hundrets of other consumers, including: cairo, compiz, metacity, pixbuf, xorg, mesa, wifi, open-closed video drivers, Mutter, Unity, indicator applets... etc. Can someone test the latest kernel on Ubuntu 8.10? ~6 hours in Ubuntu 11.04, ~10 hours in Lubuntu 11.10. I agree that the cause can't be known from this, since too many things changed all at once going from Ubuntu 11.04 to Lubuntu 11.10. I don't have time to do more tests right now, otherwise I would have. I'm still planning to do an exhaustive set of tests of different Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Lubuntu/etc releases in the future, but that's no something I have time for now or in the near future. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 846878] Re: empty space between time applet and nm-applet
I also have this bug, see attached screenshot for visual example of the effect. It gets larger over time and can be removed by restarting lxpanel (lxpanelctl restart). After restart it does start appearing again over time though. ** Attachment added: Visual example of the effect https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxpanel/+bug/846878/+attachment/2531699/+files/panel_with_empty_space.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846878 Title: empty space between time applet and nm-applet To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxpanel/+bug/846878/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
I am now running Lubuntu Beta 2 with kernel 3.0.0-12-generic and at least for me the issue seems fixed. I didn't do any actual wattage measurements, but my time on battery went from ~6 hours to ~10 hours (where it was before this whole power problem started). Since this problem seems to be very hardware specific, I am running a netbook with and Intel Atom N450 (CPU + IGP). No seperate videocard. This bug probably should be split up into multiple other bugs for the people still experiencing problems, with the split being based on hardware characteristics. Reading through all of the comments suggests that this has become a melting pot of multiple different issues, which is counterproductive to the actual finding and fixing of said bugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 818869] Re: Application menu not displayed when panel in top positition
Fix confirmed. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818869 Title: Application menu not displayed when panel in top positition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxpanel/+bug/818869/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
@Matthew What I understood from your post is that there was a bug in your wireless driver and you manually set the aspm bit which resulted in a significant power reduction? Sounds very dangerous to me (at least the stuff I read in that wiki sounds way too prone to user error), but thanks for posting the info. Maybe this could be used by someone more skilled in this than me as the start of a workaround? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
I did some power tests on my Samsung N220 Plus (atom n450 based netbook) using phoronix test suite battery power usage test. The details are published here: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1107249-GR-1107245GR43 In summary, the results are this (average power use in mW): 10.10 7660.37 11.04 unity pcie_aspm=force 8263.59 11.04 classic (no effects) pcie_aspm=force 8156.98 11.04 unity 8795.90 11.04 classic (no effects) 8194.49 Especially notice the following points: - Difference between unity and classic (no effects) when not using pcie_aspm=force -- ~600 mW (~7%) - Difference between unity and classic (no effects) when using pcie_aspm=force -- ~100 mW (~1%) - Lack of difference between pcie_aspm=force and regular when using classic (no effects) -- ~40 mW (~0.5%) - Difference between 10.10 and 11.04 classic (no effects) with or without pcie_aspm=force -- ~500 mW (~7%) Notes: 10.10 was using no effects, desktop edition ubuntu (so no compiz) Conclusions: - pcie_aspm=force makes a difference when using unity - pcie_aspm=force makes no difference when not using desktop effects - when not using desktop effects, 11.04 still takes 500 mW more than 10.10 (independent of pcie_aspm=force) So pcie_aspm=force does not fix the entire problem and (at least in my tests) only makes a difference when unity/compiz is used. This might be related to gpu usage for desktop rendering, but I don't know enough about the differences to really comment on this. If anyone knows more tests I can do to further narrow down what might be the cause, please let me know. Greetings, Erwin Junge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
I upgraded to 2.6.38-11 and ran the battery-power-usage test from phoronix test suite. The results have been added to: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1107243-GR-1107245GR40 The summary is as follows (avg power usage in mW): unity aspm 8582.55 classic aspm 8402.90 unity 8184.63 classic 8150.33 classic is again the (no effects) variety. Oddly, the latest kernel update has made pcie_aspm=force increase power usage vs no pcie_aspm=force. I'm completely stumped. Also, the difference between unity or classic has vanished when not using pcie_aspm=force. The difference of ~500 mW wrt 10.10 is still there though. I'm getting the idea that pcie_aspm is a lot less related to the current power issues than we previously thought. Any ideas on extra tests to either confirm or deny this are very welcome and will be executed swiftly. I have two of these machines (identical), so can potentially perform different tests in parallel. Greetings, Erwin Junge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 337849] Re: Tasque Error when using Remember the Milk as Task Management System
I have reinstalled Ubuntu since my previous report and since I no longer use RTM, I didn't bother to reinstall Tasque. This can therefore be regarded as a clean install. Steps taken: 1. Installed Tasque 2. Told Tasque to use RTM 3. Logged in to RTM 4. Clicked the authorize button in Tasque Result: Tasque is now functioning in concert with RTM. No error messages came up and no need for additional workarounds. In my opinion, this issue is fixed and the bug can be closed. Greetings, Erwin Junge -- Tasque Error when using Remember the Milk as Task Management System https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337849 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 530944] Re: Problem fluidity
I had the same problem when upgrading my MSI Wind from Karmic to Lucid. When I tried to remove all the NVIDIA stuff through synaptic, synaptic told me that the mythtv packages depended on libvdpau. Maybe that's why the nvidia driver got installed? I opted to remove mythtv (since I moved to xbmc recently anyway) and after a quick uninstall/reboot everything was functional again (netbook- launcher was constantly restarting for me). -- Problem fluidity https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530944 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 415023] Re: brightness is broken on MSI WIND U100
I can also confirm that updating the BIOS partially fixed the issue (I have the same 5 levels of brightness thing and concur with the idea that we've migrated to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/257827 To answer #273: While I don't own a U90 (U100 here), when I checked the bios to check the version, the system info said Msi Wind U90/U100. To me this indicates that the two systems are synonymous as far as the bios goes. If I owned a U90 I'd try it, but I can't give you any guarantees of course. -- brightness is broken on MSI WIND U100 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415023 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 415023] Re: brightness is broken on MSI WIND U100
How do I get kernel 2.6.32-020632rc6-generic ? -- brightness is broken on MSI WIND U100 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415023 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 337849] Re: Tasque Error when using Remember the Milk as Task Management System
The workaround mentioned by Hugues Haubruge worked for me as well, however I had to try multiple times. The warning was exactly the same message for me. After the 4th try, firefox finally opened a new tab with the RTM security thing in it. Confirmed to still work after re-enabling the handlers. -- Tasque Error when using Remember the Milk as Task Management System https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337849 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384447] Re: can't update from kernel 2.6.28.12.16 to 2.6.28.13.17
Works for me now as well -- can't update from kernel 2.6.28.12.16 to 2.6.28.13.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384447] Re: can't update from kernel 2.6.28.12.16 to 2.6.28.13.17
I am also affected, Jaunty 64bit. sudo aptitude safe-upgrade -v -V output: The following packages are BROKEN: linux-headers-generic [2.6.28.12.16 - 2.6.28.13.17] linux-image-generic [2.6.28.12.16 - 2.6.28.13.17] linux-restricted-modules-generic [2.6.28.12.16 - 2.6.28.13.17] The following packages will be upgraded: linux-generic [2.6.28.12.16 - 2.6.28.13.17] 4 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 13.9kB of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-restricted-modules-generic: Depends: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-13-generic which is a virtual package. linux-headers-generic: Depends: linux-headers-2.6.28-13-generic which is a virtual package. linux-image-generic: Depends: linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic which is a virtual package. Unable to resolve dependencies for the upgrade (no solution found).The following packages have been kept back: linux-generic linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic linux-restricted-modules-generic -- can't update from kernel 2.6.28.12.16 to 2.6.28.13.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 337849] Re: Tasque Error when using Remember the Milk as Task Management System
I have also run into this problem. I use two systems, one with jaunty x86_64 on it and one with UNR (which is x86) on it. Both display the behaviour and I haven't got a clue how to fix it. There is no config-file that I could locate that references anything close to the error message. Also searching in gconf-editor for tasque didn't help. If it is fixed in the master branch perhaps it would be a good idea to simply update the package in the repositories? Greetings, Erwin Junge -- Tasque Error when using Remember the Milk as Task Management System https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337849 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176461] Re: Installer crashes near end
As I said in the first followup post explaining the steps I took to get to the bug: [...] Advanced install Primary FE+BE [...] So there is as of yet no backend to verify the connection with. This is meant to be the primary (and only) backend and frontend. It's a standalone system. -- Installer crashes near end https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176461] Installer crashes near end
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity I got this message when trying to install MythBuntu: We're sorry; the installer crashed. Please file a new bug report at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+filebug (do not attach your details to any existing bug) and a developer will attend to the problem as soon as possible. To help the developers understand what went wrong, include the following detail in your bug report, and attach the files /var/log/syslog and /var/log/partman: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/ubiquity/bin/ubiquity, line 212, in module main() File /usr/lib/ubiquity/bin/ubiquity, line 207, in main install(args[0]) File /usr/lib/ubiquity/bin/ubiquity, line 65, in install ret = wizard.run() File /usr/lib/ubiquity/ubiquity/frontend/mythbuntu_ui.py, line 252, in run self.progress_loop() File /usr/lib/ubiquity/ubiquity/frontend/mythbuntu_ui.py, line 330, in progress_loop (ret, realtb)) RuntimeError: Install failed with exit code 1 Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/ubiquity/mythbuntu_install.py, line 288, in module install.run() File /usr/share/ubiquity/mythbuntu_install.py, line 100, in run self.configure_mythbuntu() File /usr/share/ubiquity/mythbuntu_install.py, line 179, in configure_mythbuntu raise InstallStepError(MythbuntuApply Debconf Xfer failed with code %d % ret) InstallStepError: MythbuntuApply Debconf Xfer failed with code 1 ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installer crashes near end https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176461] Steps taken to get to the bug
I did the following options during installation: English language Location Amsterdam Keyboard US English with dead keys Manual partitioning Only format hda1 as / (ext3) Change mountpoint on hda3 to /home (ext3) (I want to keep this one) Change mountpoint on hda4 to /medai/mythtv (xfs) (This is my recording dir) Advanced installation Primary BE+FE Unselect Archive, Browser, Controls, Flix, News and Phone Unselect SSH Service and Samba Service set Mythweb security set MySQL security configure remote -- Windows MCE newer Philips modify Video Driver settings -- nvidia_new, Composite PAL-G tv-out Unselect Silicon HDHomeRun select XMLTV I was able to reproduce the bug multiple times. -- Installer crashes near end https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176461] syslog
** Attachment added: syslog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10908786/syslog -- Installer crashes near end https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176461] partman
** Attachment added: partman http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10908797/partman -- Installer crashes near end https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
