[Bug 1887195] Re: [snap] "Show in folder" for downloaded files doesn't work

2022-06-03 Thread Fink Nottle
Note that the issue is that the file is not highlighted. It always opened the correct directory. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887195 Title: [snap] "Show in folder" for downloaded

[Bug 1887195] Re: [snap] "Show in folder" for downloaded files doesn't work

2022-06-03 Thread Fink Nottle
I still see the same issue on the latest chromium snap on 20.04 with unity. Is this dependent on the desktop environment? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887195 Title: [snap] "Show

[Bug 1887195] Re: [snap] "Show in folder" for downloaded files doesn't work

2020-08-11 Thread Fink Nottle
I tried the kde neon live cd yesterday, and it worked as expected there. Could it be a nautilus issue since it seems to work fine with dolphin ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887195

[Bug 1887197] [NEW] [snap] web.whatsapp.com doesn't support the browser

2020-07-10 Thread Fink Nottle
Public bug reported: web.whatsapp.com rejects the chromium snap browser, possibly based on the user agent string. My current user agent is "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) snap Chromium/83.0.4103.116 Chrome/83.0.4103.116 Safari/537.36". There used to be

[Bug 1887195] [NEW] [snap] "Show in folder" for downloaded files doesn't work

2020-07-10 Thread Fink Nottle
Public bug reported: In the chromium snap (Version 83.0.4103.116 on focal at the moment), after downloading files, navigating to the downloaded file doesn't work. Clicking on "Show in folder" only opens nautilus, but doesn't actually highlight the file. This works as expected on chrome and older

[Bug 1778011] Re: SRU: PRIME Power Saving mode draws too much power

2019-03-07 Thread Fink Nottle
After spending some more time with this, I can confirm that this is definitely a regression. Both nouveau and the old bbswitch based method in 16.04 were able to power off the nvidia card successfully when not in use. The current implementation of prime-select in 18.04 doesn't do that. It may be

[Bug 1778011] Re: SRU: PRIME Power Saving mode draws too much power

2019-03-03 Thread Fink Nottle
@Alberto, with prime-select intel as well as with bbswitch off, powertop shows the nvidia tunable as "good". Still, the battery's discharge rate on idle remains pretty high (around 20W) on prime-select intel. With bbswitch off, it drops to 13W or thereabouts. Do you need any more information ? --

[Bug 1778011] Re: SRU: PRIME Power Saving mode draws too much power

2019-01-11 Thread Fink Nottle
Attached powertop images. I'm not sure how accurate powertop's values and distributions are. With prime-select intel, the total estimated power remains high although it doesn't attribute it to nvidia. bbswitch also stays on. I've also attached a bbswitch off capture after prime- select intel. That

[Bug 1773515] Re: apparmor fails after removal of snapd

2019-01-06 Thread Fink Nottle
This is still broken. A key security feature of the OS breaks if you uninstall some garbage package. I wouldn't have noticed it if I hadn't seen the logs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1778011] Re: SRU: PRIME Power Saving mode draws too much power

2018-12-31 Thread Fink Nottle
Thinkpad w530. Still looks like the nvidia gpu isn't turning off. bionic+lightdm+unity7. Log attached. prime-select query intel cat /proc/acpi/bbswitch :01:00.0 ON ** Attachment added: "gpu-manager.log"

[Bug 1788563] Re: L1TF mitigation not effective in some CPU and RAM combinations

2018-09-14 Thread Fink Nottle
I don't have a trusty install to test, but #10 confirms that the test kernel from #7 resolved it for trusty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788563 Title: L1TF mitigation not

[Bug 1788563] Re: L1TF mitigation not effective

2018-09-08 Thread Fink Nottle
Yes, the bionic test kernel resolves this issue. Verified by looking at dmesg as well as https://github.com/speed47/spectre-meltdown-checker -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788563

[Bug 1652110] Re: Chromium 55+ doesn't support Widevine library

2018-08-08 Thread Fink Nottle
Yes, this is working fine right now. For the past two releases, it would break whenever the chrome version was newer than chromium. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1652110 Title:

[Bug 1652110] Re: Chromium 55+ doesn't support Widevine library

2018-07-09 Thread Fink Nottle
This is again broken with chromium 66 on 16.04. chrome is on v67 though. Some discussion about this: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-8217026.html?sid=b64f0e093db635a0dd3ceafcae15c57b -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1705981] [NEW] Chromium doesn't follow flash deprecation guidelines

2017-07-23 Thread Fink Nottle
Public bug reported: Chrome has set the global policy for flash to "ask first" for a while. Yet, chromium will always play flash content without user consent if the adobe-flashplugin package is installed on the system. Test: Visit http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/about/ on chrome and chromium.

[Bug 1652110] Re: Chromium 55+ doesn't support Widevine library

2017-07-20 Thread Fink Nottle
Relevant issue for a potential fix: https://github.com/saiarcot895 /chromium-ubuntu-build/issues/18 ** Bug watch added: github.com/saiarcot895/chromium-ubuntu-build/issues #18 https://github.com/saiarcot895/chromium-ubuntu-build/issues/18 -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1664147] Re: Chromium on trusty too outdated; not supported by gmail

2017-04-26 Thread Fink Nottle
Thank you. I've been testing the ppa version, and it works fine. The two noticeable issues are that chromecast doesn't work anymore (known upstream issue I guess), and flash's behaviour isn't the same as chrome. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1664147] Re: Chromium on trusty too outdated; not supported by gmail

2017-04-09 Thread Fink Nottle
It looks like chromium 57 has been pushed to the ppa. I tried it on trusty, and it works. I noticed one difference compared to chrome 57. Flash has been deprecated in chrome 57, and set to on-demand only. Ironically, chromium runs flash by default. The on-demand setting doesn't exist on chromium

[Bug 1664147] [NEW] Chromium on trusty too outdated; not supported by gmail

2017-02-13 Thread Fink Nottle
Public bug reported: As of Feb 13 2017, the chromium version on trusty is 53.x which is at least a couple of versions behind chrome-stable. Gmail displays this message, "This version of Chrome is no longer supported. Please upgrade to asupported browser." Core functionality in gmail works fine,

[Bug 1492229] Re: automount error due to syntax error in nsswitch.conf after ipa-client-install

2015-10-22 Thread Fink Nottle
There are other problems with the packaging in trusty though. The scripts haven't been modified to reflect ubuntu's naming and file convention. They refer to RHEL/Fedora's. Setting up ipa automount throws "rpcidmapd failed to restart: Command '/usr/sbin/service rpcidmapd restart ' returned

[Bug 1371274] Re: Unable to use the widevine plugin with Chromium

2015-08-28 Thread Fink Nottle
I got it to work following the steps stated above. However, the screen tears in this chromium build. It doesn't on chrome. I have an nvidia card. So that might have something to do with it too, although I haven't seen tearing issues on this machine in a long time. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1371274] Re: Unable to use the widevine plugin with Chromium

2015-08-28 Thread Fink Nottle
It turns out that the ppa linked above has problems with hardware acceleration. Hence the tearing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371274 Title: Unable to use the widevine plugin

[Bug 1305902] Re: indicator-sound-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_is_trusted()

2014-07-12 Thread Fink Nottle
This is still broken on Trusty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1305902 Title: indicator-sound-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_is_trusted() To manage notifications about

[Bug 1214508] Re: nvidia-settings =319 segfaults on close

2014-03-28 Thread Fink Nottle
The official version of nvidia-settings-304 in the precise-updates repository points to version 331. So if you have precise-updates enabled, even if you try to install the 304 version, it will install 331 by default. One needs to manually select an older version to get around this bug. -- You