[Bug 1813017] [NEW] directory mismatch in /etc
Public bug reported: The package installs native-messaging-hosts/com.dannyvankooten.browserpass.json in /etc/chromium, but it should use /etc/chromium-browser. As a consequence, the browser extension can not find the native helper program. Moving the native-messaging-hosts/com.dannyvankooten.browserpass.json to /etc/chromium-browser after installation solves the problem. ** Affects: browserpass (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813017 Title: directory mismatch in /etc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/browserpass/+bug/1813017/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583676] Re: Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display
Hi, I'm currently not at the affected machine, I'll try the live image later. But for now, I can confirm that it still occurs with the current saucy version. It's probably quite specific to the graphic card. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583676 Title: Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/583676/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583676] Re: Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display
Currently active BIOS version is A07. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583676 Title: Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/583676/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1245288] Re: can not alter display brightness after upgrade to 13.10
Seems to be a problem with fglrx, running the open source driver changing the brightness works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245288 Title: can not alter display brightness after upgrade to 13.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1245288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1231778] Re: wifi not working on Saucy Salamander
Tested apparmor_2.8.0-0ubuntu31.1-ubuntu, works! Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1231778 Title: wifi not working on Saucy Salamander To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ac100/+bug/1231778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1245288] Re: can not alter display brightness after upgrade to 13.10
Same problem on my Lenove S205 running fglrx. Note: Besides the stock kernel, I also have a 3.0.0 kernel installed and it shows exactly the same problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245288 Title: can not alter display brightness after upgrade to 13.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1245288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1086472] [NEW] libavcodec-dev depends on a version of libavcodec-extra-53 that doesn't exist
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1038781 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038781 Public bug reported: There is a version number inconsistency in the packages built from this source: Avialable versions: libavcodec-dev 6:0.8.4-0ubuntu0.12.10.1 libavcodec53 6:0.8.4-0ubuntu0.12.10.1 libavcodec-extra-53 6:0.8.4ubuntu0.12.10.1 Note the different version scheme for libavcodec-extra-53. libavcodec-dev depends on libavcodec53 (= 6:0.8.4-99) | libavcodec- extra-53 (= 6:0.8.4.99), libavcodec53 (= 6:0.8.4-0ubuntu0.12.10.1) | libavcodec-extra-53 (= 6:0.8.4). (and others) Therefore, the version of libavcodec-extra-53 doesn't satisfy this dependency. The same situation occurs for the other *extra* packages. The effect is, that I can not have the *extra* packages installed together with the *dev packages. I think this is only a version number glitch. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: libavcodec-dev 6:0.8.4-0ubuntu0.12.10.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-19.30-generic 3.5.7 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-19-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Dec 4 17:50:38 2012 InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-03 (427 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta amd64+mac (20110921) MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libav UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-10-19 (46 days ago) ** Affects: libav (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1038781 -dev packages are missing alternate depends on -extra packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086472 Title: libavcodec-dev depends on a version of libavcodec-extra-53 that doesn't exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libav/+bug/1086472/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1038781] Re: -dev packages are missing alternate depends on -extra packages
Affecting me because I need libav*-dev packages as a dependency of e.g. libopencv-dev and would like to have libav*extra packages concurrently. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038781 Title: -dev packages are missing alternate depends on -extra packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libav/+bug/1038781/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 896582] Re: 1814:3090 RT3090 Network speed are very low
Christopher M. Penalver, I'm still guessing and trying what causes the problems on this access point. Not enough knowledge for a bug report yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896582 Title: 1814:3090 RT3090 Network speed are very low To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/896582/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 896582] Re: 1814:3090 RT3090 Network speed are very low
I can confirm this. The problem I reported last was definitely related to that particular access point. Trying different settings showed that it is faster if WMM is turned off. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896582 Title: 1814:3090 RT3090 Network speed are very low To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/896582/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1068487] [NEW] upgrade aborts because of dependency problems
Public bug reported: Unfortunately the upgrade aborts. I ran apt-get dist-upgrade, which installed the remaining packages without problems. ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: dependency do-release-upgrade quantal ** Attachment added: from /var/log/dist-upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068487/+attachment/3403776/+files/screenlog.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068487 Title: upgrade aborts because of dependency problems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1068487/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 896582] Re: 1814:3090 RT3090 Network speed are very low
Update: The slow-speed problem still occurs. After some time of usage, network speed is limited to about 70kB/s, like it was before. This occurs on another access point, not the one that worked well (see comment #74). I don't have a clue yet, what criteria influence this behavior. Remark: the rt3090-dkms driver produces a hard-freeze when connecting to a network. It does no longer work on kernel 3.5. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896582 Title: 1814:3090 RT3090 Network speed are very low To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/896582/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 896582] Re: 1814:3090 RT3090 Network speed are very low
I've Lenovo S205 with the same wireless chipset and experiencing the same problem. A few days ago I upgraded to the current dev version of quantal, running kernel 3.5.0-16-generic. The low speed problem seems to be gone. I tried it over a longer time and across suspend an resume cycles in a 802.11g network. Using scp, I copied a larger file reaching about 2.6MB/s contiuously, several times. Looks fine now! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896582 Title: 1814:3090 RT3090 Network speed are very low To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/896582/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1044307] Re: chromium isn't updated since months
I built the current stable version with the ubuntu packaging scripts. Several patches did no longer apply correctly. I simply removed them from the series without deeper inspection. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044307 Title: chromium isn't updated since months To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1044307/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1044307] [NEW] chromium isn't updated since months
Public bug reported: What can we do to get back continuous chromium updates and therefore make this browser secure and comfortable to use on ubuntu? chromium is still on version 18. ** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044307 Title: chromium isn't updated since months To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1044307/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1015642] Re: Suspend fails on Lenovo Ideapad S205
My Lenovo S205 shows the same behaviour. It doesn't wake up about 50% of the tries. I'm now using the kernel 3.0.0-24 from oneric, which always resumes successfully. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015642 Title: Suspend fails on Lenovo Ideapad S205 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1015642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 896582] Re: RT3090 Network speed are very low with Oneiric.
I tried the current kernel for precise 3.2.0-26-generic with and without linux-backports-modules-cw-3.3-precise-generic on my lenovo s205 with RT3090 chipset. The problem still exists. After some time wireless speed no longer exceeds approx 70KB/s. While downloading data at this speed, the roundtrip to the access point increases drastically 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1025 ttl=64 time=1.34 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1026 ttl=64 time=1.33 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1027 ttl=64 time=2.12 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1028 ttl=64 time=127 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1029 ttl=64 time=500 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1030 ttl=64 time=501 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1031 ttl=64 time=479 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1032 ttl=64 time=253 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1033 ttl=64 time=894 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1034 ttl=64 time=1472 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1035 ttl=64 time=1718 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1036 ttl=64 time=1952 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1037 ttl=64 time=2266 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1038 ttl=64 time=2567 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1039 ttl=64 time=3319 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1040 ttl=64 time=4639 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1041 ttl=64 time=5066 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_req=1042 ttl=64 time=4938 ms -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896582 Title: RT3090 Network speed are very low with Oneiric. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/896582/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 896582] Re: RT3090 Network speed are very low with Oneiric.
Tried linux 3.4 from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/v3.4-precise/, no difference. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896582 Title: RT3090 Network speed are very low with Oneiric. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/896582/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 978995] Re: mysql fails to start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 986892 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986892 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 986892 Error in AppArmor rule for mysqld -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978995 Title: mysql fails to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.5/+bug/978995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 914689] Re: bluetooth fails to load into the kernel
Runs great! Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914689 Title: bluetooth fails to load into the kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-backports-modules-3.0.0/+bug/914689/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 914689] [NEW] bluetooth fails to load into the kernel
Public bug reported: The bluetooth module doesn't seem to be compatible with the kernel. $ sudo modprobe bluetooth FATAL: Error inserting bluetooth (/lib/modules/3.0.0-15-generic/updates/cw-3.1/bluetooth.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) flo@flomedio: ~ $ dmesg [ 460.266866] bluetooth: Unknown symbol security_sk_clone (err 0) The same occurs on version 3.0.0-14 of this backports package. It makes bluetooth unavailable if linux-backports-* is installed. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: linux-backports-modules-cw-3.1-3.0.0-15-generic 3.0.0-15.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-15.25-generic 3.0.13 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-15-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jan 11 11:43:01 2012 InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta amd64+mac (20110921) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: linux-backports-modules-3.0.0 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: linux-backports-modules-3.0.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bluetooth oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914689 Title: bluetooth fails to load into the kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-backports-modules-3.0.0/+bug/914689/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 914689] Re: bluetooth fails to load into the kernel
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914689 Title: bluetooth fails to load into the kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-backports-modules-3.0.0/+bug/914689/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 881786] Re: Update to 15.0.874.102/106
This update still wasn't released? What's wrong? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881786 Title: Update to 15.0.874.102/106 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/881786/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540747] Re: Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions
Seems that only three people in the world use webdav on lucid .. Will it ever be fixed in lucid repositories? -- Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 540747] Re: Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions
Seems that only three people in the world use webdav on lucid .. Will it ever be fixed in lucid repositories? -- Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583676] Re: Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display
This is still the same in maverick. A workaround is to use xrandr, mirror the affected display, which mirrors the garbage too, and then revert the reflection, which seems to restore something, and fixes the output. xrandr --output DVI-0 --reflect x xranrd --output DVI-0 --reflect normal -- Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540747] Re: Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions
Please release the fix for Lucid LTS too. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 540747] Re: Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions
Please release the fix for Lucid LTS too. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540747] Re: Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions
Will this be fixed in the lucid package too? It's LTS so there will be some people staying with it for some time! -- Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 540747] Re: Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions
Will this be fixed in the lucid package too? It's LTS so there will be some people staying with it for some time! -- Apache Web DAV incorrect permissions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583676] Re: Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display
Update: Just tried fglrx from the ubuntu repo, it has exactly the same problem after resuming. -- Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539912] Re: current battery charge not easily accessible
Apply it to the extracted source packages. -- current battery charge not easily accessible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583676] [NEW] Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-ati I use two monitor connected via DVI. After suspend to ram and resume, the picture on only one display gets scrambled and unusable. Some Facts: - Everthing runs as expected, but the left display show a picture looking like every fourth pixel is displayed, and the ones in between have the values of their neighbor. The picture is updated and flickerfree. I can attach a foto if it helps.. - Taking a screenshot gives a normal picture. - Disabling KMS by passing radeon.modeset=0 to the kernel solves the problem. I attach 2 dmesg outputs of the resume sequence. Note that with modeset=0 [drm] Resetting GPU is output, while with KMS it is not. - It occurs only if using the 2 monitors in big desktop mode. - logging out an back in solves it - fglrx (i used it until lucid) had the same issue. It was silently fixed around version 10.2. - Hibernation doesn't work too. It ends up in gdm after resuming. Maybe X crashes, but thats another story. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.13.0-1ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri May 21 09:40:46 2010 DkmsStatus: MachineType: Dell Inc. Dell XPS420 ProcCmdLine: root=/dev/mapper/lvm_vg-root ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-ati dmi.bios.date: 06/23/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A06 dmi.board.name: 0TP406 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.board.version: A01 dmi.chassis.type: 7 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA06:bd06/23/2008:svnDellInc.:pnDellXPS420:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0TP406:rvrA01:cvnDellInc.:ct7:cvr: dmi.product.name: Dell XPS420 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. system: distro: Ubuntu codename: lucid architecture: x86_64 kernel: 2.6.32-22-generic ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dual-display radeon resume -- Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583676] Re: Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855005/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855006/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855007/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855008/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855009/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855010/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855011/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855012/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855013/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855014/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855015/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855016/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855017/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855018/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855019/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855020/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: monitors.xml.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855021/monitors.xml.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855022/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855023/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855024/xkbcomp.txt -- Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583676] Re: Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display
dmesg of the resume with KMS enabled. ** Attachment added: dmesg_resume http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855073/dmesg_resume -- Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583676] Re: Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display
the same with radeon.modeset=0. Problem doen't occur with that. Note the [drm] Resetting GPU message ** Attachment added: dmesg_resume_modeset=0 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48855086/dmesg_resume_modeset%3D0 -- Resume with two displays gives scrambled pixels on only one display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579858] Re: umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint
Sorry for the reversed patch. ** Patch added: umountfs.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48799379/umountfs.patch -- umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539912] Re: current battery charge not easily accessible
I solved the issue by building a costumized version of the source package. In the relevant code parts, there are switches like #ifdef HAVE_APP_INDICATOR. The tooltip is disabled if this macro is set and the percentage values are not shown. This was introduced by a patch that adds support for application indicators (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-media/+bug/497870). AFAIK this should be a replacement for the notification area applet. But it seems we don't have it in lucid. gpm uses an ordinary tray icon. I'm not sure how to submit my patch cleanly. So I'll try it like this. Apply it to the source package. The first disalbes application indicators in debian/rules. The second compacts the display of time from %i hours %i minutes to just hh:mm. ** Patch added: disalbes application indicators and brings back tooltips and percentage http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48679455/disalbe_appindicators.patch -- current battery charge not easily accessible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539912] Re: current battery charge not easily accessible
** Patch added: Compacts time format to hh:mm http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48679498/timeformat.patch -- current battery charge not easily accessible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579858] [NEW] umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: autofs5 After I started using autofs5 in lucid I got filesystem checks on every boot up on my seperated /boot and /home partitions. They were not cleanly unmounted. I tried to research why: On shutdown /etc/init.d/umountfs calls umount to unmount filesystems it reads from /proc/mounts. Several Vars are created by the script and unmounted then. I modified the script to get the vars content. PROTECTED_MOUNTS rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 none /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 none /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 none /dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,size=1988516k,nr_inodes=497129,mode=755 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0 /dev/mapper/lvm_vg-root / ext4 rw,noatime,errors=remount-ro,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 WEAK_MTPTS /sys/kernel/security /sys/kernel/debug /sys/fs/fuse/connections REG_MTPTS /home/flo/.gvfs /mnt/autofs /boot /home TMPFS_MTPTS /tmp The problematic line is REG_MTPTS. The call to umount finally looks like this: fstab-decode umount -f -v -r -d $REG_MTPTS which expands to (in my case) fstab-decode umount -f -v -r -d /home/flo/.gvfs /mnt/autofs /boot /home When hiding plymouth screen at shutdown, I got a glimpse on a Segfault message, after the umounting outputs. The segfault occurs when trying to unmount /mnt/autofs, so /boot and /home never get unmounted and are unclean on next boot. So thats the reason for the symptom. I further tried to unmount /mnt/autofs with gdb to trace the problem. The segfault happens in strlen and is 100% reproducable. See the output file attached. When i stop the autofs daemon before trying to unmount /mnt/autofs, everything is fine, since the daemon removes the mountpoint anyways when exiting. So there may be two problems/solutions: First: Why does umount segfault? And: Is autofs not correctly stoped by upstart, and isn't that the real problem/solution? If autofs daemon would be stopped before executing umountfs, it wouldn't try to unmount the autofs mountpoint. Additional attachments: output of: cat /proc/mounts, auto.* files ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: autofs5 (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu May 13 10:40:16 2010 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: autofs5 ** Affects: autofs5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 autofs lucid segfault umount -- umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579858] Re: umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint
** Attachment added: gdb --args umount -f -r -d /mnt/autofs/ http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48377731/gdbumount.txt -- umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579858] Re: umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint
** Attachment added: /etc/auto.master http://launchpadlibrarian.net/4831/auto.master -- umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579858] Re: umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint
** Attachment added: /etc/auto.mg34 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/4838/auto.mg34 -- umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579858] Re: umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint
This patch to umountfs initscript (which doesn't belong to autofs5 package, but initscripts!) solves the problem effectively. It adds autofs to the file system types, that the script doesn't try to unmount. If we call it a solution or a workaround, I don't know.. ** Patch added: umountfs.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48401400/umountfs.patch -- umount segfault on shutdown when unmounting autofs mountpoint https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539912] Re: current battery charge not easily accessable
I also miss the tooltip info. I think it disappeared accidentially. I tried to find the reason in the source, but was not successful. It looks like everything is there (compared to karmic version, where it worked). Maybe some signal is not emitted.. I think someone with good knowledge on the code base could fix that with a little debugging. -- current battery charge not easily accessable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460652] Re: easytag crashes when setting filenames from a TXT file
Confirm for karmic x64. Similar output (glibc free error). -- easytag crashes when setting filenames from a TXT file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460652 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459948] [NEW] ksysguard doesn't restore manually set vertical scales on line graphs
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdebase-workspace When setting manual vertical scales in a line graph, those are restored wrong after a restart of ksysguard (the gui). It seams its always restored to min=0 and max=1. Although the settings are saved correctly in the config file (attachement). One should be able to reproduce this when opening the attached tab and looking at the horizontal scales. They should be 45-65 and 800-1600. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Oct 24 20:28:55 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Package: ksysguard 4:4.3.2-0ubuntu7 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-12.41-generic SourcePackage: kdebase-workspace Tags: ubuntu-unr Uname: Linux 2.6.31-12-generic i686 XsessionErrors: (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1822): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed ** Affects: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 ubuntu-unr -- ksysguard doesn't restore manually set vertical scales on line graphs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459948] Re: ksysguard doesn't restore manually set vertical scales on line graphs
** Attachment added: saved tab using two manual scaled sensors http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34331167/manual_scales.sgrd ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34331168/Dependencies.txt -- ksysguard doesn't restore manually set vertical scales on line graphs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443962] Re: display turns off and on immediatly on idle timeout
does no longer occur! -- display turns off and on immediatly on idle timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443962] [NEW] display turns off and on immediatly on idle timeout
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager After the idle timeout, the display blanks and immediatly turns on within a second. It seems like something is causing an immediate wakeup. The debug output says state not changed. The interessting lines are at the end of the file. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Oct 5 21:55:22 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Package: gnome-power-manager 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.38-generic SourcePackage: gnome-power-manager Tags: ubuntu-unr Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:6059): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:6059): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:6157): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (gnome-panel:6141): Gdk-WARNING **: /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.18.1/gdk/x11/gdkdrawable-x11.c:952 drawable is not a pixmap or window ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 ubuntu-unr -- display turns off and on immediatly on idle timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443962] Re: display turns off and on immediatly on idle timeout
** Attachment added: debug output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33051127/gpm.log ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33051128/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DevkitPower.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33051129/DevkitPower.txt ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33051130/GConfNonDefault.txt ** Attachment added: gnome-power-bugreport.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33051131/gnome-power-bugreport.txt -- display turns off and on immediatly on idle timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443962] Re: display turns off and on immediatly on idle timeout
and the issue occurs on a lenovo ideapad S10e netbook with intel atom platform. -- display turns off and on immediatly on idle timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363059] Re: [jaunty] dpms does not switch off backlight on laptop screen
Hello, after installing the latest 9.5 release from ATI, it works as expected. The driver Version overall works better than the one released with ubuntu! -- [jaunty] dpms does not switch off backlight on laptop screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366034] Re: fglrx doesn't turn off displays with dpms
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25926089/Xorg.0.log -- fglrx doesn't turn off displays with dpms https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366034 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366034] [NEW] fglrx doesn't turn off displays with dpms
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg-driver-fglrx Powersaving with displays doesn't work since upgrading to jaunty (64bit) with fglrx. It works with the same installation on nvidia hardware. So i guess it's an fglrx issue. I tested with xset dmps force off. The display went black, but didn't turn off (backlight stays on, monitor doesn't powersave). Ubuntu 9.04 xorg-driver-fglrx: Installed: 2:8.600-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 2:8.600-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 2:8.600-0ubuntu2 0 ** Affects: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: dpms fglrx off -- fglrx doesn't turn off displays with dpms https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366034 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
