[Bug 1901538] Re: Output Device selection messed (Line Out <-> HDMI)

2020-10-27 Thread Florian Schwarz
OK, so deletion of pulse config helped. First deletion only temporarly and the weird behavior came back after some switching. But after the second one it seems to be permanently fixed and I can't reproduce the faulty behavior. So I assume it can be seen as fixed?! If it happens again and is

[Bug 1901538] [NEW] Output Device selection messed (Line Out <-> HDMI)

2020-10-26 Thread Florian Schwarz
Public bug reported: [System] - Freshly installed Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS with 3rd party software/drivers enabled - pulseaudio 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.7 - NVIDIA graphics card (GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost) using nvidia-driver-450 - Monitor with build-in (stereo) speakers connected via HDMI to graphics card -

[Bug 1874217] Re: [nvidia] Dual monitor setup with secondary monitor in portrait-right mode cause tiled windows to occupy 1.5 monitors

2020-08-25 Thread Florian Schwarz
Issue is fixed for me with mutter 3.36.4. And yes, I got the scaling bug mentioned by Wallo013, too. Although mine isn't that heavy. I use 100 % and something is setting it below that (75 % - 90 %?). If I change scaling to 125 % and back to 100 %, everything is fine. After Relogin or Reboot,

[Bug 1874217] Re: [nvidia] Dual monitor setup with secondary monitor in portrait-right mode cause tiled windows to occupy 1.5 monitors

2020-07-20 Thread Florian Schwarz
The problem isn't fixed (at least for me). My system: OS: Ubuntu 20.04 - Linux [...] 5.4.0-40-generic [...] x86_64 Graphics: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST, nvidia-driver-440 Monitors: Primary monitor connected via HDMI, secondary rotated monitor connected via display port, staying left from my

[Bug 1782535] Re: cifs - poor upload speed with nautilus compared to rsync

2019-06-13 Thread Florian Schwarz
Issue may get closed. Solved with upgrading to Ubuntu 19.04. Nevertheless thanks for your help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782535 Title: cifs - poor upload speed with nautilus

[Bug 1782535] Re: cifs - poor upload speed with nautilus compared to rsync

2019-02-16 Thread Florian Schwarz
As you proposed: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1688 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782535 Title: cifs - poor upload speed with nautilus compared to rsync To manage

[Bug 1782535] Re: cifs - poor upload speed with nautilus compared to rsync

2019-02-02 Thread Florian Schwarz
By the way, due to freezing issues with copying many small files last august, I was forced to change fstab. The cifs/smb version is now 2.0: //ip-address/home /mnt/cifs_nas_home cifs uid=florian,gid=florian,credentials=/home/florian/.smbcredentials,dir_mode=0700,vers=2.0 0 0 Restrictions to

[Bug 1782535] Re: cifs - poor upload speed with nautilus compared to rsync

2019-02-02 Thread Florian Schwarz
Thank you for looking into this problem. What I observed additionally: * the very first upload copy with nautilus is normal maximum speed (~110 MB/s) * then every upload copy is about 7 MB/s * if I change the file ending to ".exe" and upload, I get maximum speed! Results to your requested data:

[Bug 1782535] Re: cifs - poor upload speed with nautilus compared to rsync

2018-07-19 Thread Florian Schwarz
Some additional performance measurements with dd... speed test with /dev/zero upload/write: dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/cifs_media/test.iso bs=10M count=400 400+0 records in 400+0 records out 4194304000 bytes (4,2 GB, 3,9 GiB) copied, 40,4893 s, 104 MB/s download/read: dd

[Bug 1782535] [NEW] cifs - poor upload speed with nautilus compared to rsync

2018-07-19 Thread Florian Schwarz
Public bug reported: I'm mounting folders from my NAS on my computer (Ubuntu 18.04) with cifs. Copying an 8 GB file... Upload (local -> mounted) - Nautilus/Nemo -> 6 MB/s - rsync -> 50-60 MB/s Download performance is also strange, but not my biggest concern. Download (mounted -> local) -

[Bug 1530138] [NEW] Package no longer works and needs to be updated to 1.26

2015-12-30 Thread Florian Schwarz
Public bug reported: Due to a change of the Flickr API, this version of flickcurl does no longer work and needs to be updated to version 1.26. ** Affects: flickcurl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu