Public bug reported:
Hi,
capnproto 0.8.0-2ubuntu1 fails on ppc64el :
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/capnproto/0.8.0-2ubuntu1/+build/23090234/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-ppc64el.capnproto_0.8.0-2ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
Lowering optimization (O3->O2) level makes the failing test pass, for
Ok so since gcc-11, it won't pass tests with -O3, neither O2.
Got it work with O1.
```
export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP = -O3
export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -O1
```
As it worked fine as is with gcc-10 on Impish, I guess it's definitely
something for the toolchain team.
--
You received this
That would be nice!
What is the rational behind the choice of not enabling wifi for instance ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925335
Title:
subiquity installer : ibmveth disabled by
Public bug reported:
Hi,
on PowerVM, when installing a ppc64el LPAR (P8, P9, P10) with an ibmveth
network interface,
this one is disabled by default even if it works and has a working DHCP server
entry leading
subiquity installer to propose to "Continue without network" whereas it
actually
skiboot.lid is available on all architectures as part of qemu-system-data
package which is "all", not ppc specific.
The latter is pulled by the binary package qemu-system-ppc, so no particular
action is needed.
---
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu 5.4.0-72-generic #80-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr
Small update on this.
Not sure I should have close that bug in my latest upload in Debian, but
with 1.0.15, libdfp has support for i386 and amd64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809098
Interesting, that very same iso works well on P8 and I tried on a P9
(witherspoon) vm and didn't have any issue.
I don't have access to RaptorCS machines, though I don't get what could be
related to the hardware given the type of error at that point
Could you attach some more logs :
Hi Franck,
which iso URL did you use ?
On which machine ? baremetal, vm, LPAR ?
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840580
Title:
19.04 server powerpc64-el Installer fails at
Thanks Thadeu, good to know the problem has been identified !
I'll be happy to test the fix.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837726
Title:
Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM :
The fix is in 5.3.0-12.13 but trying current
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/eoan-proposed/main/installer-ppc64el/current/images/netboot/mini.iso
(2019-09-21 81M, 3ed00b52f4335c589f4e1b070107c1af mini.iso)
the kernel of the installer just panics without much details...
Preparing to
Thanks Seth, I'll test this as soon as it's released.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837726
Title:
Installation fails on eoan/PowerVM : missing /dev/nvram
To manage
apport-collect is not available from the installation iso shell
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837726
Title:
Public bug reported:
Hi,
since eoan and kernel 5.2, the installation fails when installing grub at the
end.
Actually /dev/nvram does not exist.
nvram support was previously built in the kernel and is now built as a module,
and the module is not shipped within the iso or in udebs.
This is
Hi,
what I know from the upstream is that libdfp is work in progress on x86 32b/64b.
So as the Debian package maintainer of libdfp, I don't intend to add other
architectures than the one well supported.
In Debian, libdfp is also compiled on powerpc and ppc64.
So no other arch is planned to be
Hi all,
bug #1785081 was not mirrored completely for some reason and I'm working
on fixing this : it's just about the bug happening on 18.04 specifically
kernel 4.15.0-26. Sorry for the lag.
Also, on ppc64el, RHEL 7.5 with a 4.14 kernel uses deadline, so I guess it's
not a completely unsafe
Hi,
the log file mode is dealt with by logrotate. So restarting opal-prd won't make
logrotate start and change anything (logrotate is called from crontab). The
test case would rather be :
[Test Case]
- install fixed version of opal-prd package
- stop opal-prd daemon : sudo systemctl stop
Thanks a lot Steve!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790601
Title:
Ubuntu18.10 - Update libocxl to version 1.1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Nevertheless, I've upgraded libocxl to 1.1 in Debian Unstable since
linux 4.18 reached Unstable on September 6th.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790601
Title:
Ubuntu18.10 -
Hi,
this should be done since version 6.0.1-6 :
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-6.0/1:6.0.1-6
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1784213
Title:
lld missing on
Dimitri, we've synced the other bug 1785081 that is probably the same
issue as this one.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709889
Title:
Ubuntu 17.04: Bug in cfq scheduler, I/Os do
Fixed in skiboot-6.1-2 (Debian/Unstable).
You may use the same fix for 18.04 there :
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/skiboot/commit/0e6ac150e51a0e7b3701acf78c311709b6336d58
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Łukasz, Adam, thanks a lot for your help.
I don't know if Abdul tested Ubuntu's build but he did test successfully
with a build I did last week, when debian-installer was no yet rebuilt
on Ubuntu's side. Indeed that made sense on hwe which he tested ok.
Thanks for taking this pro-actively in
Hi,
the packaging I pushed in Debian was accepted by ftpmasters into unstable and
synced to 18.10/universe.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771813
Title:
[Ubuntu 18.10 FEAT] new
Hi Dimitri,
I did the test with the netboot vmlinux/initrd.gz from xenial-proposed and
'apt-setup/proposed=true'
and it worked :
---
ubuntu@garri:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS
Release:16.04
Codename: xenial
Hi Dimitri,
hard to say, but this is taken into account :
https://github.com/open-power/petitboot/issues/15
F.
** Bug watch added: github.com/open-power/petitboot/issues #15
https://github.com/open-power/petitboot/issues/15
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Hi Manoj, the patches that fixed this issue are the 3 listed above in my
comment :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1739498/comments/6
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi again,
I tested the latest netboot installer there
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/xenial-proposed/main/installer-ppc64el/current/images/hwe-netboot/ubuntu-installer/ppc64el/
and it worked perfectly.
Thanks,
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Hi Steve,
sorry for the delay, I've been afk. I'll check this today and let you know.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715101
Title:
Xenial : installer fails on POWER9
To manage
Hi Vasant,
does that mean that we don't need to run vpdupdate on both, installation of a
new package, and upgrade of the package ?
If so, what is vpdupdate binary needed for ? Do we still need to keep it
packaged ?
Regards,
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thanks Vasant for double checking the fix.
The patch is in ppc64-diag 2.7.4-2 in Unstable.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715397
Title:
systemd 234-2ubuntu9 ADT test failure
Hi there,
I upgraded ppc64-diag to 2.7.4 in Debian Unstable.
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708494
Title:
Update Package request for ppc64-diag
To manage notifications about
Public bug reported:
Hi,
could you please update the installer to use linux-hwe version >=
4.10.0-29 for POWER9 on Xenial.
At the moment the kernel/vmlinux in
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/xenial-proposed/main/installer-ppc64el/current/images/hwe-netboot/ubuntu-installer/ppc64el/
Could you review this rollback patch ?
Thanks
** Patch added: "partman-auto-fix-baremetal-ppc64el.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1689829/+attachment/4875551/+files/partman-auto-fix-baremetal-ppc64el.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
Hi,
on ppc64el, using autopartitioning with LVM, the system will install but after
rebooting petitboot won't find the /boot content that is on LVM, because
petitboot doesn't handle LVM yet.
So the system will not be bootable.
The changes that cause this are in the following
This is fixed in Debian Unstable but due to the freeze in Ubuntu, it was
not synced to Zesty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549098
Title:
Systemd init script does not pass --pnor
Hi Steve,
indeed, not all the machines would be concerned, even if the daemon won't be
loaded as it already does
this check itself, which is why I was not sure to do the check at install time
or later by the daemon itself.
It's better though to target only the specific configuration.
The
I'm planning a new upstream release in Debian and I'm interested by this
patch, but it seems it's still discussed for improvement at the moment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671019
The feature is actually fixed but it's hardcoded in the service file.
When I'll upload a new version, I'll use /etc/default/opal-prd as Jeremy
suggested.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Could you review the proposed patch based on the following :
some people recently ran into several issues on Minsky where they found that
Opal PRD
was not running
I think this is related to ubuntu-meta that provides the different meta
packages for the different ubuntu flavors
** Package changed: debian-installer (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi,
here is the packages in a PPA :
https://launchpad.net/~ibmpackages/+archive/ubuntu/kimchi-project/+packages
Note : kimchi dev team re-architectured the project and splitted kimchi into
several components.
Ginger as a plugin remains ginger.
But kimchi got splitted as wok (the engine),
Hi Dmitri,
the fix was in the pipe at the moment when you wrote this.
This should be fixed : https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rear
Sorry for that and thanks for taking time to explain,
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
My patch has landed in Debian, as rpm 4.12.0.1+dfsg1-6 and it got synced
in Ubuntu Yakkety.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594670
Title:
rpm on ubuntu 16.04 fails to honor non-zero
Here is the debdiff that applies on top of rpm-4.12.0.1+dfsg1 .
** Patch added: "rpm-fix-preun.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/+bug/1594670/+attachment/4699444/+files/rpm-fix-preun.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I sent a patch here : https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/74 .
Review seems positive, but we still need to wait for the merged.
I also opend the bug in Debian and sent the debdiff :
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830194 .
Would it be possible to have the patch
Public bug reported:
Please sync libcxl 1.4-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped:
Hi,
libcxl has been accepted in Debian unstable with the new version 1.4, and
several fixes that were asked for in Debian and Ubuntu :
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #823407
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823407
** Also affects: bsd-mailx (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823407
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
Ok, so actually on xenial, cxl.h comes with linux-libc-dev. So the build
doesn't try to fetch it online.
linux-libc-dev needs to be >=4.2 to have that header file, which is ok on
xenial, so everything is good here.
I guess it's not needed to have a build-dep on linux-libc-dev>=4.2 as the
Hi,
I saw that the compilation fetches a cxl.h header online, so here is patch, else
it will fail to build in the ubuntu schroot that prevents internet connexions.
Sorry for that,
F.
** Patch added: "libcxl.debdiff"
Public bug reported:
Hi,
at the moment gridengine is not build on ppc64el ; only gridengine-common is
available on ppc64el and
it confuses some users :
---
(xenial)ubuntu@vm7:~$ apt-cache search gridengine
gridengine-common - Distributed resource management - common files
python-drmaa -
Public bug reported:
For ppc64el, we would need some patches submitted upstream and
importing the experimental version from debian (the patches for ppc64el are
based on luajit 2.1)
Could you help on that ?
Here are the details on bugs.debian.org :
Verification successfully done on Trusty with : ipmitool
1.8.13-1ubuntu0.6
According to the bug fix in git :
The current USB plugin doesn't find my IPMI channel:
# ipmitool -I usb mc info
Error in USB session setup
Unable to setup interface usb
Error
Verification successfully done on Trusty with : ipmitool
1.8.13-1ubuntu0.6
According to the bug fix in git :
The current USB plugin doesn't find my IPMI channel:
# ipmitool -I usb mc info
Error in USB session setup
Unable to setup interface usb
Error
As of latest xenial alpha release, libvecpf is not available.
Can the Canonical team let us know what is needed ?
Thank you :
ubuntu@vm80:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch)
Release:16.04
Codename:
Here is a patch.
Some comments :
- the Makefile installed the systemd unit files in the wrong system unit
directory, so they were not detected and not enabled/started with
dh_installinit so I did a small debian/patch.
- then once, the path is fixed the call to invoke-rc.d in the generated
Hi,
I'm copying here what Pridhiviraj said internally at IBM :
"FW upgrade is successful with proposed ipmitool from trusty-proposed."
He did the upgrade from IBM-firestone-ibm-OP8_v1.6_0.38 to
IBM-firestone-ibm-OP8_v1.7_0.3 with
ubuntu@ltc-fire5:~$ dpkg --list | grep ipmitool
ii ipmitool
Hi,
I'm copying here what Pridhiviraj said internally at IBM :
"FW upgrade is successful with proposed ipmitool from trusty-proposed."
He did the upgrade from IBM-firestone-ibm-OP8_v1.6_0.38 to
IBM-firestone-ibm-OP8_v1.7_0.3 with
ubuntu@ltc-fire5:~$ dpkg --list | grep ipmitool
ii ipmitool
Hi,
just for the record : I could build with Steve's patch on ppc64el
(1.8.13-1ubuntu0.5) and flash successfully our firestone machine as before with
1.8.13-1ubuntu0.4
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipmitool in
Hi,
just for the record : I could build with Steve's patch on ppc64el
(1.8.13-1ubuntu0.5) and flash successfully our firestone machine as before with
1.8.13-1ubuntu0.4
F.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks David, I've tried the patch on the latest ipmitool source but I have a
few problems :
- the patch does not apply on top of the already existing
patch_memcpy_param.patch : I removed the latter from ubuntu debian/patches and
I could apply all the series.
- when I compile the package I got
Thanks David, I've tried the patch on the latest ipmitool source but I have a
few problems :
- the patch does not apply on top of the already existing
patch_memcpy_param.patch : I removed the latter from ubuntu debian/patches and
I could apply all the series.
- when I compile the package I got
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #797987
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797987
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542
Title:
[FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd)
> Sorry, I can't sponsor this in Debian, but I can probably find someone
> who could.
That'd be nice ; give him/her my mail if I can be of any help in that process.
In addition, I opened an ITP on Debian :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797987
Jeremy said linux 4.2 should have
Mathieu, thanks a bunch for this.
On the Debian side, it would be nice to push for it.
Do you have the possibility to sponsor that ?
Jeremy, I know that there are some needs on the kernel side, but there is a 4.2
in experimental, would it be enough ?
Fred
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 17:14:37 -,
) = Frédéric Bonnard (frediz)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1459700
Title:
Distribute SPHDE 1.0.1 with Ubuntu
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Jeremy, is upgrade to 5.1.1 required ?
For trusty I guess canonical would prefer to change the version as less as
possible.
So, do we require this right away, orshould we wait an upcoming version which
will bundles more important stuff later ?
Thanks for your insight.
--
You received this bug
I don't know which should be made duplicate of the other, but the following bug
is linked to this one :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418642/+files/skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.dsc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418641/+files/skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.dsc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Here is a packaging for opal-prd based on what Jeremy Kerr did with some
improvements.
As I understand, we need opal-prd kernel headers which is tracked in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562 .
For the time being, Jeremy provided me a -linux-libc-dev .deb for 14.10 so I
** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418602/+files/skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.dsc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418588/+files/skiboot_5.0.4-0ubuntu1.dsc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.4.orig.tar.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418601/+files/skiboot_5.0.4.orig.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
This is a bug to track the inclusion of opal-prd package in Ubuntu. The
plan is to add it initially for 15.10 and later backport it to 14.04
archive.
opal-prd is a daemon that listens for hardware diagnostic events (by
listening on the /dev/opal-prd device), and executes
Here is a packaging for opal-prd based on what Jeremy Kerr did with some
improvements.
As I understand, we need opal-prd kernel headers which is tracked in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562 .
For the time being, Jeremy provided me a -linux-libc-dev .deb for 14.10 so I
** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.3.orig.tar.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418569/+files/skiboot_5.0.3.orig.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: skiboot_5.0.3-1.debian.tar.xz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1467542/+attachment/4418570/+files/skiboot_5.0.3-1.debian.tar.xz
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) = ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Taco Screen team (taco-screen-team) = Frédéric Bonnard (frediz)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1408071
Title:
[needs-packaging] [Ubuntu 15.04
Public bug reported:
In 8.35 it's not necessary to disable jit support on ppc64el. I sent a
patch on debian :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786530
I can send a debdiff on Ubuntu, is it needed ?
F.
** Affects: pcre3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
I couldn't reproduce that exactly but got the same symptom on other packages.
From what I've been checking, I think this bug is the same problem as this one
:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1436448
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I couldn't reproduce that exactly but got the same symptom on other packages.
From what I've been checking, I think this bug is the same problem as this one
:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1436448
So marking as duplicate of #122991
--
You received this bug notification
I got this also on the latest Ubuntu 14.04 : it's looping over this
indefinetly :
[0.193973]
[0.194023] Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#3]
[0.194128] SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA PowerNV
[0.194225] Modules linked in:
[0.194316] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Tainted: G D
partman-auto upstream is ok, having a max of 5G.
The package in vivid just needs to be updated to the one in SId (124) :
https://launchpad.net/partman-auto :
partman-auto source package in Vivid Version 118ubuntu3 uploaded on 2014-04-11
partman-auto source package in Utopic Version 118ubuntu3
Ok going deeper, the recipe for multi file systems specifies on 15.04
the following for / : /lib/partman/recipe_ppc64el/80multi
---
70 800 300 $default_filesystem
$lvmok{ }
$primary{ }
method{ format }
format{ }
use_filesystem{ }
Hi,
actually the problem is a disk space missing issue while installing
linux-image-3.18.0-9-generic . For some reason, the disk layout may be
not enough. But I don't think this is related to ppc64el as I did the test on
amd64 and got the same.
I'll do the test with older releases of Ubuntu how
85 matches
Mail list logo
