[Bug 2016860] Re: Error/crash while trying to wipe disk during 23.04+ install

2024-04-25 Thread Frank Heimes
Based on the recent ISO, QA Tracker and installation tests around the 24.04 release, this issues got solved and it did not happened anymore with recent images, hence I'm closing this LP bug. ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: subiquity

[Bug 2009495] Re: [Ubuntu 22.04] smc_run does not work, libsmc-preload.so cannot be preloaded

2024-04-24 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009495 Title: [Ubuntu 22.04] smc_run does not work, libsmc-preload.so

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-23 Thread Frank Heimes
Hi @seth-arnold, I am not in-depth familiar with security related updates (since they happen rarely for me, and if private-security are handled by the security team anyway). " My assumption is that these package updates should be published first to -updates for autopkgtest testing, and once

[Bug 2056485] Re: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected

2024-04-22 Thread Frank Heimes
With that I'm closing this LP bug by updating it to Won't Fix. (This does not mean that fixes will never be possible or done at all, 'Won't Fix' in this case indicates that the workaround / alternative fix was not desired, hence was not chosen; and it was taken in lieu of a better status.) **

[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image

2024-04-22 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311 Title: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job

[Bug 2056485] Re: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected

2024-04-22 Thread Frank Heimes
Hello @Jamie, thanks for your answer and feedback. Your decision is understood. @Robie Based on this, there is no need to follow the alternative approach anymore, and I think this SRU request can be recalled and I would like to ask you to reject socat from the focal unapproved queue. -- You

[Bug 2062556] Re: [Ubuntu-24.04] Hugepage memory is not getting released even after destroying the guest!

2024-04-22 Thread Frank Heimes
I just had a look at noble's master-next tree: $ git remote get-url origin git://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/noble $ git branch * master-next and found that commit 19c1ceeca8ed is already applied: $ git log --oneline | grep -n "block: Fix page refcounts for

[Bug 2062556] Re: [Ubuntu-24.04] Hugepage memory is not getting released even after destroying the guest!

2024-04-22 Thread Frank Heimes
** Also affects: ubuntu-power-systems Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062556 Title: [Ubuntu-24.04] Hugepage memory is not getting released

[Bug 2050019] Re: [24.04 FEAT] [SEC2353] zcrypt: extend error recovery to deal with device scans

2024-04-22 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2050019 Title: [24.04 FEAT] [SEC2353] zcrypt: extend error recovery to deal

[Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

2024-04-22 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051835 Title: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x) To manage

[Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-18 Thread Frank Heimes
I've noticed that Vasily's commit has meanwhile landed in linux-next, so I took it from there and applied it to noble master-next, but it failed due to changed context. Hence I did a bit of backporting work and got now it in. I triggered appropriate kernel test builds here:

[Bug 2062118] Re: autopkgtests fail on s390x (segfault)

2024-04-18 Thread Frank Heimes
Is it know if 'Test: trace pid events filter' also ended up in a segfault on earlier versions, e.g. 1.7.0-1 / mantic? (Probably not, looks like the test suite is only triggered during build starting with 1.8.0-1ubuntu1 / noble...) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2062118] Re: autopkgtests fail on s390x (segfault)

2024-04-18 Thread Frank Heimes
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy) ** Tags added: reverse-proxy-bugzilla -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-17 Thread Frank Heimes
** Description changed: SRU Justification: [ Impact ]  * Symptom:    * There is an issue with the Secure Execution (SE) tooling,  especially the new IBM host-key subject locality,  that leads to the fact that on April 24 (z15) / March 29 (z16)  users will notice

[Bug 2048917] Re: [needs-packaging] Intel Integrated Performance Primitives - ipp-crypto

2024-04-17 Thread Frank Heimes
** Also affects: ipp-crypto (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ipp-crypto (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-17 Thread Frank Heimes
Cool, thanks a lot Steffen! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059303 Title: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools) To manage notifications about

[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image

2024-04-17 Thread Frank Heimes
I gave ~ppa5 a try on my s390x system. If I set all interfaces to "optional: true" (incl. encc000), but except encc000.2653, I don't face the timeout anymore. But if I UNset "optional: true" for encc000 on top, I tap into the timeout again. In the past it was okay to NOT have "optional: true"

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-16 Thread Frank Heimes
Marc and me, we had a side discussion and finally found the missing commits and have a proper build for focal. The build is available here: https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp205930 and the debdiff(s) attached. ** Attachment added: "debdiff_focal.tgz"

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-16 Thread Frank Heimes
Hi Marc, I've added f5744b95db9, but I unfortunately still get the build errors: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724893134/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-s390x.s390-tools_2.12.0-0ubuntu3.9_BUILDING.txt.gz (search for "error:") -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-16 Thread Frank Heimes
** Description changed: SRU Justification: [ Impact ] - * Symptom: +  * Symptom: -* There is an issue with the Secure Execution (SE) tooling, - especially the new IBM host-key subject locality, - that leads to the fact that on April 24 (z15) / March 29 (z16) -

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-16 Thread Frank Heimes
For focal the commit d14e7593cc6 (https://github.com/ibm-s390-linux/s390-tools/commit/d14e7593cc6380911ca42b09e11c53477ae13d5c) does not properly build and the logs show a few errors: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/723098720/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-s390x.s390-tools_2.12.0-0ubuntu3.8_BUILDING.txt.gz

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-15 Thread Frank Heimes
s390-tools and s390-tools-signed debdiffs for 22.04/jammy ** Attachment added: "debdiff_jammy.tgz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/2059303/+attachment/5765796/+files/debdiff_jammy.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-15 Thread Frank Heimes
Hi Steffen, many thanks for the tests, that's highly appreciated! I'm glad to see that we are fine with noble, mantic and jammy. It was btw. good to pick the version from the noble archive, since it's in beta). (And btw. we usually do not alter DISTRELEASE in common.mak.) I'm uploading first of

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-15 Thread Frank Heimes
s390-tools and s390-tools-signed debdiffs for 23.10/mantic ** Attachment added: "debdiff_mantic.tgz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/2059303/+attachment/5765782/+files/debdiff_mantic.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2060020] Re: [Ubuntu-24.04]: Unable to bring up a guest with 1GB RAM using virt-install

2024-04-15 Thread Frank Heimes
Ok, this came out of the discussions. With that I'm closing this bug ... ** Changed in: virtinst (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 2056485] Re: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected

2024-04-11 Thread Frank Heimes
Well, to me it looks like socat is like a Swiss army knife, where some features are popular and are used often, but others are very rarely used. Also please consider potential reactions of users that run into this (or similar cases): 1) (trivial) Users notice this problem (or not) and don't do

[Bug 1883957] Re: socat-1.7.3.3 (focal) termios options incorrectly applied to the second address

2024-04-11 Thread Frank Heimes
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2056485 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056485 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2056485 Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2060807] Re: [UBUNTU 24.04] s390x: clone clobbers r7

2024-04-10 Thread Frank Heimes
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2055175 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055175 I strongly believe that this is a duplicate of LP#2055175, which is meanwhile Fix Released and should be included in the latest noble/24.04 daily images. glibc in noble (release) is currently (Apr 10th)

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-10 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059303 Title: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality

[Bug 2058944] Re: [UBUNTU 24.04] dbginfo.sh: updates required for /bin/dash shell

2024-04-10 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058944 Title: [UBUNTU 24.04] dbginfo.sh: updates required for /bin/dash

[Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-09 Thread Frank Heimes
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: s390x ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-06 Thread Frank Heimes
Hi Steffen, thanks for checking the updated packages. Indeed, I had to restart the build of the s390-tools-signed packages for mantic/23.10, /jammy/22.04 and focal/20.04. These build will be complete in an hour or so (so well before Monday). Since the updates need to be done starting with the

[Bug 2056485] Re: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected

2024-04-06 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056485 Title: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected To manage

[Bug 2056491] Re: not able to install noble on PowerVM LPARs `Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block`

2024-04-06 Thread Frank Heimes
Fantastic, thanks for re-testing and confirming! Closing this ticket as Fix Released. ** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image

2024-04-06 Thread Frank Heimes
I see (deep in my mind I remember that such a discussion happened or at least started somewhere). Just notice that one interface is still _not_ optional, here in my case: encc000 And the behavior changed recently, with the above config I didn not hit the timeout in the past (even with earlier

[Bug 2046439] Re: Wrong code execution of s390x code with qemu TCG

2024-04-06 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046439 Title: Wrong code execution of s390x code with qemu TCG To manage

[Bug 2055175] Re: [UBUNTU 23.10] s390x: clone clobbers r7

2024-04-05 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055175 Title: [UBUNTU 23.10] s390x: clone clobbers r7 To manage

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-04 Thread Frank Heimes
Builds finally completed: noble: https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2059303 mantic, jammy, focal: https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/test -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2056485] Re: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected

2024-04-03 Thread Frank Heimes
Thanks for having a look at this SRU. The general compile of the socat code works after just having commit 5ebf36038f39 "Under certain circumstances, options of the first address were applied to the second address" applied. However, the build also triggers a huge amount of tests, and one, test

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-03 Thread Frank Heimes
** Description changed: + SRU Justification: + + [ Impact ] + + * Symptom: + +* There is an issue with the Secure Execution (SE) tooling, + especially the new IBM host-key subject locality, + that leads to the fact that on April 24 (z15) / March 29 (z16) + users will notice

[Bug 2060108] Re: greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on ppc64el (and riscv64)

2024-04-03 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: python-greenlet (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060108 Title: greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on ppc64el (and

[Bug 2060108] [NEW] greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on ppc64el (and riscv64)

2024-04-03 Thread Frank Heimes
Public bug reported: greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on riscv64 and ppc64el: complete build logs at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-greenlet/3.0.3-0ubuntu2 riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wall -g -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
ource/s390-tools/+bug/2059303/+attachment/5761332/+files/debdiffs.tgz ** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Frank Heimes (fheimes) ** Changed in: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Frank Heimes (fheimes) ** Changed in: s390-too

[Bug 2060020] Re: [Ubuntu-24.04]: Unable to bring up a guest with 1GB RAM using virt-install

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
Oh sorry, I just noticed that the ppc64el ISO was NOT updated and is still from March 28th, means it still has the -11 kernel inside. We need to investigate why it wasn't updated - and why there is no daily from April 1st and 2nd ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2058944] Re: [UBUNTU 24.04] dbginfo.sh: updates required for /bin/dash shell

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
Unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors, since meanwhile a new LP bug came in (LP: #2059303), and I'm going to upload a new debdiff that covers both - LP: #2059303 and this, LP: #058944. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
This is not incl. in Ubuntu-6.8.0-20.20, but will be included in the next updated kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051835 Title: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

[Bug 2060020] Re: [Ubuntu-24.04]: Unable to bring up a guest with 1GB RAM using virt-install

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
Hello Kowshik, thanks for bringing this up. 2GB RAM is not a lot, but according to 22.04 it should be sufficient (for Ubuntu Server, Ubuntu Desktop already wants 4GB) - so I am not sure if the min. req. for RAM may have or will change with 24.04 - I'll check. Meanwhile, would you please re-try

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
Well, I already had a hard time to get the requested commits applied to noble (which is on 2.31.0). I figured out that: 1) commit f6c6f0cc712433221fb0588c754e0d09884453dd ("rust/pv/test: Code + Certificate refactoring") is needed on top as pre-requisite, otherwise the other patches do not

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
** Also affects: s390-tools (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: s390-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects:

[Bug 2059303] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] SE-tooling: New IBM host-key subject locality (s390-tools)

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => s390-tools (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper

[Bug 2055175] Re: [UBUNTU 23.10] s390x: clone clobbers r7

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055175 Title: [UBUNTU 23.10] s390x: clone clobbers r7 To manage notifications

[Bug 2059237] Re: [Ubuntu-24.04] "array-index-out-of-bounds" error is observed after every reboot

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
Thanks for testing the '-20' kernel @kowshik.jois and thanks for the updates @arighi and @hariharan.ts. With that I'm closing this ticket (as Fix Released in 6.8.0-20). ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems Status:

[Bug 2016860] Re: Error/crash while trying to wipe disk during 23.04+ install

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
Great, thx for the update Dan! ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016860 Title: Error/crash while trying to

[Bug 2045250] Re: pam_lastlog doesn't handle localtime_r related errors properly

2024-03-28 Thread Frank Heimes
Included in pam | 1.5.3-5ubuntu3. ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2038583] Re: Turning COMPAT_32BIT_TIME off on s390x

2024-03-28 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038583 Title: Turning COMPAT_32BIT_TIME off on s390x To manage

[Bug 2051683] Re: [24.04 FEAT] [LDP2406] 64bit Only Distro - Remove 31/32bit Support Completely

2024-03-28 Thread Frank Heimes
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2038583 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038583 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2055702] Re: installer crashes after importing my launchpad SSH key

2024-03-28 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055702 Title: installer crashes after importing my launchpad SSH key

[Bug 2055003] Re: Qemu cmdline core dumped with more(8193 or more) cpus

2024-03-28 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055003 Title: Qemu cmdline core dumped with more(8193 or more) cpus To

[Bug 2059237] Re: [Ubuntu-24.04] "array-index-out-of-bounds" error is observed after every reboot

2024-03-28 Thread Frank Heimes
Hi Kowshik, sorry, just noticed the machine data line in the log: "IBM,9080-HEX POWER10 (raw) 0x800200 0xf06 of:IBM,FW1060.00 (NH1060_013) hv:phyp" Well, there is no proposed "ISO" - "-proposed" is just a special (pre-release) area in the archive for packages, incl. kernel. So I just

[Bug 2038583] Re: Turning COMPAT_32BIT_TIME off on s390x

2024-03-27 Thread Frank Heimes
Applied for 6.8.0-12.12, so included in -20 (that is atm still in -proposed). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038583 Title: Turning COMPAT_32BIT_TIME off on s390x To manage

[Bug 2059237] Re: [Ubuntu-24.04] "array-index-out-of-bounds" error is observed after every reboot

2024-03-27 Thread Frank Heimes
** Tags added: noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059237 Title: [Ubuntu-24.04] "array-index-out-of-bounds" error is observed after every reboot To manage notifications about

[Bug 2059237] Re: [Ubuntu-24.04] "array-index-out-of-bounds" error is observed after every reboot

2024-03-27 Thread Frank Heimes
And another quick question: on which systems does that happen? P9 (bare-metal or PowerVM) or P10 (PowerVM) or KVM on Power? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059237 Title:

[Bug 2059237] Re: [Ubuntu-24.04] "array-index-out-of-bounds" error is observed after every reboot

2024-03-27 Thread Frank Heimes
Hello Kowshik Jois, thanks for raising our attention on this. I apologize, but once a Launchpad ticket got closed (for example as Fix Released), like with LP#2055126, it is no longer actively monitored anymore (by our team), hence we missed your additional comments. (I just found your comments,

[Bug 2052767] Re: "Index out of range" error observed while installing 24.04

2024-03-27 Thread Frank Heimes
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2059237 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059237 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2059237 [Ubuntu-24.04] "array-index-out-of-bounds" error is observed after every reboot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2059237] Re: [Ubuntu-24.04] "array-index-out-of-bounds" error is observed after every reboot

2024-03-27 Thread Frank Heimes
** Also affects: ubuntu-power-systems Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage (ubuntu-power-triage) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage

[Bug 2042853] Re: [UBUNTU 23.04] Kernel config option missing for s390x PCI passthrough

2024-03-27 Thread Frank Heimes
This LP bug was entirely s390x specific, hence not affecting any other platform. So setting verification again to done, to potentially unblock any further processes. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-6.5 ** Tags added: verification-done

[Bug 2048919] Re: [UBUNTU 23.04] Regression: Ubuntu 23.04/23.10 do not include uvdevice anymore

2024-03-27 Thread Frank Heimes
This LP bug was entirely s390x specific, hence not affecting any other platform. So setting verification again to done, to potentially unblock any further processes. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-6.5 ** Tags added: verification-done

[Bug 2056491] Re: not able to install noble on PowerVM LPARs `Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block`

2024-03-26 Thread Frank Heimes
Hi @kowshik.jois, the (daily) images still have the same kernel inside (the 6.8 -11): $ rmadison --arch=ppc64el --suite=noble,noble-proposed linux-generic linux-generic | 6.8.0-11.11+1 | noble | ppc64el linux-generic | 6.8.0-20.20+1 | noble-proposed | ppc64el But there is now a newer

[Bug 2058944] Re: [UBUNTU 24.04] dbginfo.sh: updates required for /bin/dash shell

2024-03-26 Thread Frank Heimes
) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Frank Heimes (fheimes) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2058944] Re: [UBUNTU 24.04] dbginfo.sh: updates required for /bin/dash shell

2024-03-26 Thread Frank Heimes
** Patch added: "debdiff_s390-tools-signed_noble_from_2.31.0-0ubuntu1_to_2.31.0-0ubuntu4.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2058944/+attachment/5759487/+files/debdiff_s390-tools-signed_noble_from_2.31.0-0ubuntu1_to_2.31.0-0ubuntu4.diff -- You received this bug

[Bug 2058944] Re: [UBUNTU 24.04] dbginfo.sh: updates required for /bin/dash shell

2024-03-26 Thread Frank Heimes
** Patch added: "debdiff_s390-tools_noble_from_2.31.0-0ubuntu3_to_2.31.0-0ubuntu4.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2058944/+attachment/5759486/+files/debdiff_s390-tools_noble_from_2.31.0-0ubuntu3_to_2.31.0-0ubuntu4.diff -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2058944] Re: [UBUNTU 24.04] dbginfo.sh: updates required for /bin/dash shell

2024-03-25 Thread Frank Heimes
Kicked-off a PPA build of patched s390-tools version 2.31.0-0ubuntu4 here: https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2058944 ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug

[Bug 2058944] Re: [UBUNTU 24.04] dbginfo.sh: updates required for /bin/dash shell

2024-03-25 Thread Frank Heimes
signee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team) => Frank Heimes (fheimes) ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: High => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 2050019] Re: [24.04 FEAT] [SEC2353] zcrypt: extend error recovery to deal with device scans

2024-03-22 Thread Frank Heimes
I've submitted the PR to the kernel teams mailing list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-March/thread.html#149742 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team) => Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) ** Information type

[Bug 2016860] Re: Error/crash while trying to wipe disk during 23.04+ install

2024-03-20 Thread Frank Heimes
I did more tests, on LPAR, z/VM, with FCP/SCSI, DASD/ECKD and have not faced this issue a single time (or any udev related issues). So I would consider the installer "edge/lp-2016860" as fixed and working. (I used the noble daily from today March 15th as base.) -- You received this bug

[Bug 2016860] Re: Error/crash while trying to wipe disk during 23.04+ install

2024-03-20 Thread Frank Heimes
Hi Dan, things look very promising, since I installed using edge/lp-2016860 on this ECKD FBA guest, where the situation was worst, and the install succeeded ! (Trying now on more and different systems and disk types ...) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

2024-03-20 Thread Frank Heimes
Got marked as APPLIED by kernel team (Paolo). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051835 Title: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x) To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 2056485] Re: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected

2024-03-19 Thread Frank Heimes
> High ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Frank Heimes (fheimes) ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Assignee: Frank Heimes (fheimes) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

2024-03-19 Thread Frank Heimes
Patches that are needed for noble/24.04 submitted to the kernel teams mailing list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-March/149667.html https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-March/thread.html#149667 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High **

[Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

2024-03-19 Thread Frank Heimes
** Summary changed: - [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages + [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051835 Title: [24.04 FEAT] Memory

[Bug 2016860] Re: Error/crash while trying to wipe disk during 23.04+ install

2024-03-19 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016860 Title: Error/crash while trying to wipe disk during 23.04+ install To

[Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages

2024-03-18 Thread Frank Heimes
** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051835 Title: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2048462] Re: [needs-packaging] dfx-mgr from Xilinx

2024-03-18 Thread Frank Heimes
Hello Talha, had a look and re-uploaded (just made the GPL-3 section a separate one). It's now in NEW. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048462 Title: [needs-packaging] dfx-mgr from

[Bug 1934887] Re: Enhance the initial, basic network configuration

2024-03-18 Thread Frank Heimes
** Tags removed: installer ** Tags added: installation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934887 Title: Enhance the initial, basic network configuration To manage notifications about

[Bug 2016860] Re: Error/crash while trying to wipe disk during 23.04+ install

2024-03-18 Thread Frank Heimes
** Tags removed: installer ** Tags added: installation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016860 Title: Error/crash while trying to wipe disk during 23.04+ install To manage

[Bug 2024901] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] Unsupported setup: Directory '/boot' is located on a multi-target device-mapper device

2024-03-18 Thread Frank Heimes
** Tags removed: installer ** Tags added: installation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024901 Title: [UBUNTU 20.04] Unsupported setup: Directory '/boot' is located on a

[Bug 2016860] Re: Error/crash while trying to wipe disk during 23.04+ install

2024-03-15 Thread Frank Heimes
While testing with the today's ISO image (March 15th) I noticed that things have improved, especially on DASD/ECKD and FCP/SCSI systems. Where I'm seeing that now mainly is on DASD/FBA systems, that are a bit special, anyway attaching the crash file and entire /var/log - just in case... **

[Bug 2056373] Re: Problems with HVCS and hotplugging

2024-03-15 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056373 Title: Problems with HVCS and hotplugging To manage

[Bug 2023243] Re: Multiple issues found on Ubuntu 20.04 against drmgr

2024-03-14 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023243 Title: Multiple issues found on Ubuntu 20.04 against drmgr To

[Bug 2056491] Re: not able to install noble on PowerVM LPARs `Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block`

2024-03-13 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056491 Title: not able to install noble on PowerVM LPARs `Kernel panic - not

[Bug 2057696] Re: 24.04 install on s390x crashes due to an aio issue

2024-03-13 Thread Frank Heimes
** Description changed: - Using the ISO image 11032024 on an LPAR hosted on a LinuxONE III system - with an NVMe drive attched, it looks like the installation fails because - fdasd is called with the NVMe drive as argument. + Since the original message that jumped to my eyes when the crash

[Bug 2057696] Re: 24.04 install on s390x crashes due to an aio issue

2024-03-13 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical => High ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Critical => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2057696] Re: 24.04 install on NVMe drive crashes because fdasd is called

2024-03-13 Thread Frank Heimes
Had a closer look at the crash file(s), and I'm not sure if the message that was presented to me during the installation, after the crash is due to the kind of optimistic approach and probing that is done during installation ?! But it actually never makes sense to do: " Running command ['fdasd',

[Bug 2057696] [NEW] 24.04 install on NVMe drive crashes because fdasd is called

2024-03-12 Thread Frank Heimes
Public bug reported: Using the ISO image 11032024 on an LPAR hosted on a LinuxONE III system with an NVMe drive attched, it looks like the installation fails because fdasd is called with the NVMe drive as argument. " get_blockdev_sector_size: (log=512, phys=512) Running command ['fdasd',

[Bug 2055175] Re: [UBUNTU 23.10] s390x: clone clobbers r7

2024-03-12 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055175 Title: [UBUNTU 23.10] s390x: clone clobbers r7 To manage notifications about

[Bug 2056485] Re: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected

2024-03-08 Thread Frank Heimes
New build (with changes squashed into one) are successfully build here: https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2056485-2 Especially test #384 was successful: " test 384 SOCAT_OPT_HINT: check if merging single character options is rejected... OK " The overall test results are like

[Bug 2056485] Re: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected

2024-03-08 Thread Frank Heimes
tu0.1.diff ** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Frank Heimes (fheimes) -- You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 2056485] Re: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected

2024-03-08 Thread Frank Heimes
The second build with the additional patch succeeded: https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2056485 " test 385 TERMIOS_PH_ALL: are termios options applied to the correct address... OK " (actually all test were not successfully completed) I'm now merging both into one package change

[Bug 2056485] Re: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected

2024-03-08 Thread Frank Heimes
I kicked-off some initial test builds in PPA, but one test fails now: " test 385 TERMIOS_PH_ALL: are termios options applied to the correct address... FAILED ./socat -t 0.1 -T 1 STDIO,echo=0 EXEC:cat " and I see that is related, and got added to test.sh by the requested patch: " +# test for a

[Bug 2056485] Re: Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected

2024-03-08 Thread Frank Heimes
** Summary changed: - Multiple issues found on Ubuntu 20.04 against socat + Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056485 Title: Behaviour of

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >