[Bug 1330290] Re: Building ubuntu images on debian host fails because of tmpdir

2014-10-15 Thread Ghe Rivero
** Also affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1330290 Title: Building ubuntu images on debian host

[Bug 1073639] [NEW] Option to not boot on install

2012-10-31 Thread Ghe Rivero
Public bug reported: There are some environments when is a requisite not to boot the server on install (inside chroots for images creation p.e.). Right now, there is no way to avoid this. ** Affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this

[Bug 1073639] [NEW] Option to not boot on install

2012-10-31 Thread Ghe Rivero
Public bug reported: There are some environments when is a requisite not to boot the server on install (inside chroots for images creation p.e.). Right now, there is no way to avoid this. ** Affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this

[Bug 979192] Re: FFE: Separate agent binaries in different packages

2012-04-13 Thread Ghe Rivero
Improved patch with upstart services included and some minimal fixes. ** Patch added: quantum-agents.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quantum/+bug/979192/+attachment/3057731/+files/quantum-agents.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 979192] Re: FFE: Separate agent binaries in different packages

2012-04-13 Thread Ghe Rivero
Improved patch with upstart services included and some minimal fixes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979192 Title: FFE: Separate agent binaries in different packages To manage

[Bug 979159] [NEW] Several installation error issues

2012-04-11 Thread Ghe Rivero
Public bug reported: As reported in https://lists.launchpad.net/netstack/msg01030.html by Dan Wendlandt: apt-get install quantum-server - chown: cannot access `/etc/quantum/' : No such file or directory - chown: cannot access `/var/run/quantum/' : No such file or directory - plugins.ini and

[Bug 979159] Re: Several installation error issues

2012-04-11 Thread Ghe Rivero
** Attachment added: quantum.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979159/+attachment/3047848/+files/quantum.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979159 Title: Several

[Bug 979163] Re: quantum-server needs to create /var/run/quantum

2012-04-11 Thread Ghe Rivero
/var/run may be a temporary filesystem, so any directories or files needed there should be created dynamically at boot time (or init-startup script). In this case, it should be created and chmod'ed in the startup scripts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 979190] [NEW] Missing upstart scripts

2012-04-11 Thread Ghe Rivero
Public bug reported: There are no upstart scripts installed. At last, quantum-server is necessary. Also, the agents daemon (ryu, linuxbridge and openvswitch) would require a upstart too. ** Affects: quantum (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 979192] [NEW] Separate agent binaries in different packages

2012-04-11 Thread Ghe Rivero
Public bug reported: quantum-linuxbridge-agent , quantum-openvswitch-agent , quantum-ryu- agent should be available in their own packages. ** Affects: quantum (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 979192] Re: Separate agent binaries in different packages

2012-04-11 Thread Ghe Rivero
This patch generate the basic agents binaries packages. It's missing a default conf file (a plugin-common package could be generated to share the conf file between the plugin and the agent pkg). It's also missing an upstart script. ** Patch added: quantum-agents.patch

[Bug 931236] Re: keystone install is unnecessarily interactive

2012-02-28 Thread Ghe Rivero
Another way round can be to remove db_input low keystone/configure_db || true from keystone.config and just preseed it if we want interactive installation. Maybe some tweaks should be need in postint script just to configure sqlite by default, but it could works. -- You received this bug

[Bug 931236] Re: keystone install is unnecessarily interactive

2012-02-28 Thread Ghe Rivero
Another way round can be to remove db_input low keystone/configure_db || true from keystone.config and just preseed it if we want interactive installation. Maybe some tweaks should be need in postint script just to configure sqlite by default, but it could works. -- You received this bug

[Bug 931236] Re: keystone install is unnecessarily interactive

2012-02-27 Thread Ghe Rivero
And easy way to avoid interactive installation can be with: # echo dbconfig-common dbconfig-common/mysql/admin-passpassword essex | debconf-set-selections # echo keystonekeystone/auth-token string 999888777666 | debconf-set-selections # cat

[Bug 931236] Re: keystone install is unnecessarily interactive

2012-02-27 Thread Ghe Rivero
And easy way to avoid interactive installation can be with: # echo dbconfig-common dbconfig-common/mysql/admin-passpassword essex | debconf-set-selections # echo keystonekeystone/auth-token string 999888777666 | debconf-set-selections # cat

[Bug 908974] [NEW] Include tcos in ubuntu

2011-12-27 Thread Ghe Rivero
Public bug reported: tcos is a mature VDI solution now included in Debian. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908974

[Bug 891227] [NEW] nova.conf force_dhcp_release doesn't take any parameter

2011-11-16 Thread Ghe Rivero
Public bug reported: the nova.conf distributed within nova-common, includes the flag -force_dhcp_release=True New nova versions (essex-1 and go on), use this flag with any parameter. Please update it to: --force_dhcp_release ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Bug 891229] [NEW] nova-manage_flagfile_location.patch identation error

2011-11-16 Thread Ghe Rivero
Public bug reported: the patch nova-manage_flagfile_location.patch located in ubuntu packaging stuff, introduces identation errors in nova-manage ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 891227] [NEW] nova.conf force_dhcp_release doesn't take any parameter

2011-11-16 Thread Ghe Rivero
Public bug reported: the nova.conf distributed within nova-common, includes the flag -force_dhcp_release=True New nova versions (essex-1 and go on), use this flag with any parameter. Please update it to: --force_dhcp_release ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Bug 891229] [NEW] nova-manage_flagfile_location.patch identation error

2011-11-16 Thread Ghe Rivero
Public bug reported: the patch nova-manage_flagfile_location.patch located in ubuntu packaging stuff, introduces identation errors in nova-manage ** Affects: nova (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 723721] Re: Sync lshw 02.15-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-02-23 Thread Ghe Rivero
I'm going to check it now. Ghe Rivero On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Darik Horn dajh...@vanadac.com wrote: This package has a regression on LaunchPad bug #193373 and LaunchPad bug #208399. Why was the privacy.patch removed from the 2.15 build without a changelog entry?   The lshw package

[Bug 90709] Re: lshw uses deprecated PCMCIA ioctl interface

2008-01-17 Thread Ghe Rivero
Revolving upstream. http://ezix.org/project/ticket/118 ** Changed in: lshw (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- lshw uses deprecated PCMCIA ioctl interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 183620] Re: lshw writes out null characters

2008-01-17 Thread Ghe Rivero
This bug is resolved in new versions. See: http://ezix.org/project/ticket/142 and http://ezix.org/project/ticket/338 ** Changed in: lshw (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- lshw writes out null characters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183620 You received this bug notification

[Bug 158740] Re: Problem with post-installation script

2008-01-17 Thread Ghe Rivero
Should test with new versions to confirm ** Changed in: libapache-mod-auth-kerb (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- Problem with post-installation script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug