[Bug 948064] Re: Compiz: little problems with title bar when not maximized.

2012-03-06 Thread Jakbest
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948064

Title:
  Compiz: little problems with title bar when not maximized.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/948064/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 948064] [NEW] Compiz: little problems with title bar when not maximized.

2012-03-06 Thread Jakbest
Public bug reported:

- OS version: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS alpha 2 updated to today (it should be the same 
as the beta, but I'm not sure)
- Compiz version: 0.9.7.0
- Description:  Ubuntu precise (development branch)
- Release:  12.04

When a window isn't maximized if you put your mouse over a button
(close, minimize, maximize) it didn't show you the button over image.
Also if in: System settings - Universal access, you increase the font
size, nothing will happen in the title bar.

All of that work if the windows is maximized and the button and the
title are include in the top panel (with unity).

Sorry if the bug isn't important and if I made mistakes (I'm italian).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: compiz 1:0.9.7.0~bzr2995-0ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic-pae 3.2.9
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
.tmp.unity.support.test.0:
 
ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu1
Architecture: i386
CompizPlugins: 
[core,composite,opengl,decor,mousepoll,vpswitch,regex,animation,snap,expo,move,compiztoolbox,place,grid,imgpng,gnomecompat,wall,ezoom,workarounds,resize,fade,unitymtgrabhandles,scale,session,unityshell]
CompositorRunning: compiz
Date: Tue Mar  6 15:15:20 2012
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: precise
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 fglrx-updates, 8.911, 3.2.0-17-generic-pae, i686: installed
 fglrx-updates, 8.911, 3.2.0-18-generic-pae, i686: installed
GraphicsCard:
 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Device [1002:9647] (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
   Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:107c]
 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Whistler [AMD Radeon HD 6600M Series] 
[1002:6741] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:107c]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (20120217)
JockeyStatus:
 xorg:fglrx_updates - Driver grafici «fglrx» proprietari ATI/AMD (aggiornamenti 
post-release) (Proprietario, Disabilitato, Non in uso)
 xorg:fglrx - Driver grafici «fglrx» proprietari ATI/AMD (Proprietario, 
Disabilitato, Non in uso)
Lsusb:
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 058f:a016 Alcor Micro Corp.
MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. K53TA
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-18-generic-pae 
root=UUID=65c2eee0-3c3d-4335-8f39-815e74316d08 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: compiz
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 07/20/2011
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 206
dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: K53TA
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr206:bd07/20/2011:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnK53TA:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnK53TA:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct10:cvr1.0:
dmi.product.name: K53TA
dmi.product.version: 1.0
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.7.0~bzr2995-0ubuntu5
version.fglrx-installer: fglrx-installer N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.30-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.1-0ubuntu2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.1-0ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu4
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 
1:2.6.99.901+git20120126-0ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 
1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.17.0-1ubuntu4
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1build2

** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug bar compiz-0.9 i386 precise regression reproducible title 
ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948064

Title:
  Compiz: little problems with title bar when not maximized.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/948064/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 877505] Re: compiz (core) - Warn: this should never happen. you should probably file a bug about this.

2011-10-26 Thread Jakbest
Only:
1)
compiz (core) - Warn: unhandled ConfigureNotify on 0x120034f!
compiz (core) - Warn: this should never happen. you should probably file a bug 
about this.
2)
compiz (core) - Warn: unhandled ConfigureNotify on 0x1200365!
compiz (core) - Warn: this should never happen. you should probably file a bug 
about this.
3)
compiz (core) - Warn: unhandled ConfigureNotify on 0x1200153!
compiz (core) - Warn: this should never happen. you should probably file a bug 
about this.
4)
compiz (core) - Warn: unhandled ConfigureNotify on 0x120015b!
compiz (core) - Warn: this should never happen. you should probably file a bug 
about this.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877505

Title:
  compiz (core) - Warn: this should never happen. you should probably
  file a bug about this.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/877505/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 664763] Re: nm-applet crashes if there is no internet: Caught signal 15

2011-10-26 Thread Jakbest
This bug affects all the people I know who use Ubuntu 11.10 and also me,
because when Ubuntu is going to shutdown it takes 15 more seconds than
the previous versions: 400% slower (20 seconds VS 5 seconds)! Isn't the
importance High?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664763

Title:
  nm-applet crashes if there is no internet: Caught signal 15

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/664763/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty

2011-10-16 Thread Jakbest
I HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM, BUT MINE IS VERY WORST!!! MY BATTERY STARTS
WITH 2:45 HOURS REMAINING (AND WITH A CORRECT ENERGY SAVER IT CAN BE
MORE THAN 3 HOURS) AND AFTER EACH 10 MINUTES MY BATTERY HAS 30 MINUTES
LESS.

CAN SOMEONE UNDERSTAND THAT THIS BUG IS A VERY IMPORTANT REGRESSION THAT
LET ME TO NOT RECOMMEND GNU/LINUX TO MY FRIEND WHO HAVE A
NOTEBOOK/NETBOOK? I CAN UNDERSTAND ALL BUT THIS BUG IS RELATED WITH THE
FIRST ONE: IF UBUNTU WANTS TO BE BETTER THAN WINDOWS THIS BUG MUST BE
RESOLVED, ELSE THERE IS NO CHANCE!! I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS VERY A PROBLEM
FROM 2.6.38 TO 3.1 (AND PROBABLY MORE) BUT I KNOW THAT IS A PROBLEM OF 3
RELEASE OF UBUNTU!!!

I WOULDN'T BE ANGRY IF UBUNTU WAS DISGUSTING, BUT IT IS A PERFECT SYSTEM
(WITH SOME PROBLEM OF COURSE) BUT I CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHY WE HAVE THAT
REGRESSION

Sorry for my English, I'm AN ITALIAN USER OF UBUNTU (THIS TO UNDERSTAND
THAT UBUNTU IS NOT A LITTLE AND NOT IMPORTANT OS)

WITH ANGER, JAKBEST

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131

Title:
  Power consumption raised significantly in natty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs