This bug can be closed.
In OPTIONS where --config is described, it clearly states:
(...) See section CONFIGURATION FILE for more information how to write the
files.
And in section "CONFIGURATION FILE" there is complete exaple of the
configuration file.
** Changed in: dyndns (Ubuntu)
A fix is being implemented for the 2.10-28 zoo release. Wath changelog
at http://packages.qa.debian.org/z/zoo.html
** Changed in: zoo (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Can't reproduce with 1.0-5 (2013)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fcrackzip.html
# For /usr/share/dict/cracklib-small
apt-get install cracklib-runtime
zip -e test.zip *.txt
Enter password: abc
Verify password: abc
fcrackzip -D -p /usr/share/dict/cracklib-small test.zip
(... normal output, no
Fixed in 20051212-13. See releases and changelog at
http://packages.qa.debian.org/micro-httpd
** Changed in: micro-httpd (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Fixed in 1.4.1-6. See releases and changelog at
http://packages.qa.debian.org/fbdesk
** Changed in: fbdesk (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: edb (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/977174
Title:
edb segmentation fault
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: cloc (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788856
Title:
cloc reports deprecated function usage oneiric
To manage
Fixed in 2.6-2. See releases http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/speedometer.html
See related report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/speedometer/+bug/510800
** Changed in: speedometer (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Fixed in 2.6-2. See releases
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/speedometer.html
** Changed in: speedometer (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This bug report can probably be closed as it concerns version
20051212-10 from 2008. There is newer version 20051212-13 (2010)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394949
Title:
package
This bug can be closed as it's for 1.53 from 2010. There is newer Debian
package 1.58-1 (2013) available
http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cloc.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788856
Please close this bug. It has nothing to do with Ubuntu or Debian as
there is no such package.
To original bug submitter: please contact the author of the software
directly. The correct place to report this bug is mentioned in the
project page http://codef00.com/projects#debugger namely
Thank you for the fix.
This bug can be closed. The correction was included in 1.4.1-6 (2011)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fbdesk.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435250
Title:
Thanks Beata, fix included in Debian version 1.1-7, 2013-06-03
http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/armada-backlight.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937453
Title:
doesn't work
To
It took me a white to undertand where the date problem was, but I think
you're referring to this:
# Commands run in *one* big line so that date discrepancies are
minimized
cd some safe dir
rm -f *.zoo *.bak *.txt; \
touch -d 2000-02-01 01:01:00 1-oldest.txt; \
touch -d 2000-03-01
I'm the Debian maintainer of zpaq. I'd like to explain why the zpaq
hasn't been updated since.
* Not having any manual pages. the pages were hand written by me.
The pages are quite extensive in size and coverage.
* After 1.10 the zpaq infrastructure changed radically.
It was split into
The zpaq 1.x is completely different from other zpaq versions, so in
practice the 1.x is the final version of the development branch. If
someone want's to package any later versions, please name it zpaq2.
This is analogue to Apache 1.x and Apache 2.x that are completely
different code base.
Jari
Frowarded to upstream:
https://code.google.com/p/winetricks/issues/detail?id=261
** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/winetricks/issues #261
http://code.google.com/p/winetricks/issues/detail?id=261
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This should be fixed in upcoming 2.10-27
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/z/zoo/current/changelog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/892788
Title:
Adding a file to a zoo
Forwarded to upstream issue tracker
https://bitbucket.org/tcolar/wmfrog/issue/9/02-wmfrog-assert-failure-buffer-overflow
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556203
Title:
wmfrog assert
Could you translate that error message to English. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815708
Title:
package winetricks 0.0 20110402 failed to install/upgrade: problém se
See Debian bug for possible discussion related to this bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610979.
Summary: Currently, IPv4-IPv4 and IPv6-IPv6 doesn't work. Only IPv4-IPv6
and IPv6-IPv4 as documented in
the manual. (...) It is really unfortunate that the other combinations
Bug forwarded upstream
http://code.google.com/p/winetricks/issues/detail?id=177
** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/winetricks/issues #177
http://code.google.com/p/winetricks/issues/detail?id=177
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Already included in Debian fcrackzip/1.0-2. See
http://patch-
tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/fcrackzip/1.0-2/20-bug-430387
-cannot-deal-files-with-special-chars.patch
This bug can be closed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bazaar
I find often to want to write:
bzr diff -r 15..head
just to find out that I should have used magic number -1. Could you
add 'head' alias to revspec. This would help people coming from
CVS/SVN/GIT to orientate better to bzr.
** Affects: bazaar
Please close this bug. This bug was supposed to be set for bzr, not
bazaar
--
revspec: add 'head' alias to mean -1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/84665
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
26 matches
Mail list logo
