[Bug 885027] Re: SUID Mount Helper has 5 Major Vulnerabilities
I'm not sure this is actually exploitable...the posted exploit fails on my GNU/kFreeBSD box: $ gcc 70calibrerassaultmount.sh -o full-nelson 70calibrerassaultmount.sh: file not recognized: File format not recognized $ ./full-nelson -bash: ./full-nelson: No such file or directory Is there different compiler (icc?) or architecture (maybe needs a RISC arch?) requirement? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885027 Title: SUID Mount Helper has 5 Major Vulnerabilities To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/calibre/+bug/885027/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600631] Re: Password does not unlock screen
What's ls -l /etc/shadow look like? /etc/shadow should be 640, owner root, and group shadow. I only ask because I ran into the same issue after exploiting myself with the recent pam_motd vulnerability. My PoC (http://twitter.com/jonoberheide/status/18009527979) changed the ownership of /etc/shadow and upon changing it back (I think I did chown root:root instead of root:shadow), I had the same issue of not being able to log in via the screensaver and the same check pass; user unknown error message (unix_chkpwd can't read the file if its not shadow group readable). I would blame it on the recent vulnerability...except that your initial bug report pre-dated the vulnerability announcement. :-) -- Password does not unlock screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600631] Re: Password does not unlock screen
What does your /var/log/auth.log look like when this happens? Regards, Jon Oberheide -- Password does not unlock screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan
Vreixo, I'll post some thinkfinger packages for Jaunty later today in my PPA. Regards, Jon Oberheide -- Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan
The thinkfinger packages for jaunty are built and available in my PPA: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/jon-oberheide/ppa/ubuntu jaunty main deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/jon-oberheide/ppa/ubuntu jaunty main Let me know if there's any issues! Regards, Jon Oberheide -- Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311732] Re: 2.6.28-4 breaks thinkfinger
Noel, I think you're bluetooth module observations is an artifcact of the following commit: UBUNTU: Build in BT l2cap,rfcomm,sco http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-jaunty.git;a=commit;h=0b3c77d51905b3b782208d06756fc4d62df116cd The bluetooth support is being built into the kernel as opposed to a module so you won't see it in lsmod. Looking at the git log, there really doesn't seem to be many changes between .3 and .4 that would affect the thinkfinger reader. usbcore (CONFIG_USB) and evdev (CONFIG_INPUT_EVDEV) were changed to be built-in rather than modules but that shouldn't affect anything. Regards, Jon Oberheide -- 2.6.28-4 breaks thinkfinger https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311732] Re: 2.6.28-4 breaks thinkfinger
This is just a shot in the dark, but you could try libusb 1.0 which was released early December (jaunty still uses the 0.1 package). libusb is used by thinkfinger to communicate with the fingerprint device. It certainly doesn't explain the differing functionality between kernel versions, but who knows. -- 2.6.28-4 breaks thinkfinger https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311732] Re: 2.6.28-4 breaks thinkfinger
Does lsinput, lshal, or lsusb show the presence of the fingerprint reader? -- 2.6.28-4 breaks thinkfinger https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan
Here's the composite patch of the key bit workaround and reverting r116. ** Attachment added: thinkfinger_0.3+r118-0ubuntu4~ppa2.diff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20765782/thinkfinger_0.3%2Br118-0ubuntu4%7Eppa2.diff -- Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311732] Re: 2.6.28-4 breaks thinkfinger
Could you attach the strace output while running the tf-tool command? -- 2.6.28-4 breaks thinkfinger https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257827] Re: brightness changes twice when using hotkeys
I believe this update broke LCD brightness controls on a number of ThinkPad models (R61i, T61, X300). See: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=6426872 -- brightness changes twice when using hotkeys https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257827 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan
thinkfinger-0.3+r118-0ubuntu4~ppa2 with the r116 revert patch is building now in my PPA. Feel free to give it a test once it lands! -- Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan
The thinkfinger packages in my PPA are only a workaround for the underlying bug in hal. The upstream hal bug hasn't gotten much attention though. -- Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269071] Re: Intrepid regression: default route is no longer redirected over VPN tunnel
I believe clicking the ignore automatically obtained routes checkbox is an effective workaround until the new nm packages are released addressing this bug. -- Intrepid regression: default route is no longer redirected over VPN tunnel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan
** Attachment added: hal output for good.c testcase http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19346306/good.txt -- Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan
** Attachment added: hal output for bad.c testcase http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19346303/bad.txt -- Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan
I've tracked down the source of this issue in hal's hald/linux/device.c. When a new input device is added, it goes through a series of checks to determine what kind of device it is (mouse, keyboard, etc). In input_test_key(), hal will figure out the size of the bitmask of the devices (num_bits, aka the number of buttons this input device has). If num_bits == 1, hal will treat the device as a button (eg. power/sleep/hibernate button) rather than a keyboard. Otherwise, it will run further checks to see what kind of keyboard it is (input_test_keyboard(), input_test_keypad()). This explains exactly why having only a single key on the uinput device (KEY_ENTER) fails to work and adding a second dummy key (KEY_A) fixes the problem. Without the dummy key, the uinput device is treated as a button instead of a keyboard and does not send the KEY_ENTER event when using libpam-thinkfinger. I'll email upstream and figure out if there's a proper fix to allow one- button keyboards or if hacking around it is the best approach. -- Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #18375 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18375 ** Also affects: hal via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18375 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Intrepid regression: carriage-return required after finger scan https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: following finger scan requires carriage-return
Unsure. It uses the workaround patch previously posted (adding a dummy KEY_A key capability to the uinput device). Without the workaround, the uinput device doesn't even show up in xinput list. For some reason, a keyboard uinput device with only a KEY_ENTER is not sufficient to be registered. So while it's more of a workaround than a fix, it does indeed resolve the issue and has absolutely zero side effects. -- following finger scan requires carriage-return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: following finger scan requires carriage-return
Packages which resolve this issue are available in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~jon-oberheide/+archive deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/jon-oberheide/ubuntu intrepid main deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/jon-oberheide/ubuntu intrepid main -- following finger scan requires carriage-return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 264094] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in XVisualIDFromVisual()
Updated package has landed in Intrepid, this bug can be closed. -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in XVisualIDFromVisual() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 264094] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in XVisualIDFromVisual()
According to the author of the upstream package, nspluginwrapper, this bug has been fixed in the latest release: http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/en/blog/2008/10/13/nspluginwrapper_1.1.2 ** Bug watch added: Email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Also affects: nspluginwrapper via mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Importance: Undecided Status: New -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in XVisualIDFromVisual() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: following finger scan requires carriage-return
Attached is a patch to thinkfinger that should workaround the bug by adding a dummy key (KEY_A) to the uinput device. It's certainly not a proper fix to why xorg is not correctly sending the KEY_ENTER but it's certainly an option for those of you who find hitting enter after you swipe annoying and/or don't have an xorg.conf to add the configuration workaround. ** Attachment added: thinkfinger-uinput-hack.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18515541/thinkfinger-uinput-hack.patch -- following finger scan requires carriage-return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: following finger scan requires carriage-return
** Attachment added: good.c http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18474144/good.c -- following finger scan requires carriage-return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: following finger scan requires carriage-return
** Attachment added: bad.c http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18474145/bad.c -- following finger scan requires carriage-return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: following finger scan requires carriage-return
I've attached two samples that show this behavior outside of thinkfinger. They both create a uinput device and send a KEY_ENTER event. In bad.c, when the device is only set up with a KEY_ENTER key, the KEY_ENTER event is not observed in X. However, in good.c, if another supported key (say KEY_A) is added to the uinput device as well, the sending of the KEY_ENTER event works just fine. Both of the testcases work as expected outside of X in the terminal which leads to me to believe something is getting munged in X's input layer. -- following finger scan requires carriage-return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259383] Re: Imap in evolution doesn't work
This bug is still present for me in 2.24.0, please re-open and let me know what further information is necessary. I've attached the output of running evolution --debug, hitting send/receive, and still not seeing the proper updates of the content of my IMAP inbox. ** Attachment added: ev.debug http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17945695/ev.debug -- Imap in evolution doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259383] Re: Imap in evolution doesn't work
I've only experienced the issue with the inbox. Then again, I'm not frequently checking my archived mail to see if new messages have been archived. :-) -- Imap in evolution doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258643] Re: intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300
All of the kernel-related ACPI issues described have been resolved in 2.6.27 for me. The LCD brightness controls are still not working but appears to be a userspace issue as the events are properly being received by acpid. I'll look into those separately, but for now, we can close this bug. -- intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 264094] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in XVisualIDFromVisual()
Looks like an issue with new changes introduced in nspluginwrapper 1.1.0 to add support for windowless plugins (eg. Flash 10). The X11 visual (ws_info-visual) seems to be getting mucked somewhere, making XVisualIDFromVisual unhappy. -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in XVisualIDFromVisual() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: following finger scan requires carriage-return
Ah, nice catch Patrick. Perhaps it is something in xorg/xinput/xorg- input-evdev. I'll try to bisect. -- following finger scan requires carriage-return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: following finger scan requires carriage-return
I can confirm that downgrading all my xorg packages to hardy fixes the problem. -- following finger scan requires carriage-return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259383] Re: Imap in evolution doesn't work
I'm also seeing this problem on Intrepid with 2.23.90 (although I believe it was present in a previous version as well). I have two IMAP accounts (gmail and university) and both are experiencing this issue of not seeing mail in the inbox. One way to workaround the issue is to open up Folder-Subscriptions and uncheck and then recheck the inbox folder. An annoying workaround but hopefully it helps narrow down the problem area. -- Imap in evolution doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: following finger scan requires carriage-return
I can confirm this on Intrepid as well. It seems to be related to libpam-thinkfinger's use of uinput. libpam- thinkfinger creates a uinput device to send a EV_KEY/KEY_ENTER press and release. This event _should_ emulate the enter key being pressed after a finger swipe so that the user does not have to press it manually. I don't see any errors in the pam debug output about sending the enter event. Either libpam-thinkfinger is misusing uinput somehow or GDM is not processing the key event (maybe it's blocking focus on the password prompt textbox?). Regards, Jon Oberheide -- following finger scan requires carriage-return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: following finger scan requires carriage-return
After debugging for far too many hours, I have an apparent hack/fix. Simply setting another KEYBIT along with our KEY_ENTER seems to fix the issue. The other KEYBIT can be any value and it doesn't seem to matter if the other KEYBIT is set before or after KEY_ENTER. If another KEYBIT is not set, it appears that the kernel is not sending the KEY_ENTER event. I don't recommend committing this until we figure out what the root cause is, but if anyone else experiencing the problem could test it and verify that it resolves their issue, that'd be great.h ** Attachment added: thinkfinger-pam-uinput.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16970940/thinkfinger-pam-uinput.patch -- following finger scan requires carriage-return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256429] Re: following finger scan requires carriage-return
FYI, this issue of not receiving a key event when only one is set is reproducible in a standalone test program outside of thinkfinger-pam. So either it's a kernel issue or for some reason uinput wasn't designed to work with only a single KEYBIT set (which seems incorrect since it worked with earlier kernels). -- following finger scan requires carriage-return https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258643] Re: intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300
** Attachment added: uname http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16882638/uname.txt -- intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258643] Re: intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300
** Attachment added: lspci http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16882661/lspci.txt -- intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258643] Re: intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300
** Attachment added: dmidecode http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16882663/dmidecode.txt -- intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258643] Re: intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300
** Attachment added: proc http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16882666/acpi.tar.bz -- intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258643] Re: intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300
** Attachment added: kernlog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16882672/kern.log.0 -- intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258643] Re: intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300
The requested ACPI information has been attached. -- intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258643] [NEW] intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300
Public bug reported: Upon upgrading to the Intrepid alpha from Hardy, a significant amount of ACPI functionality has failed on my Lenovo Thinkpad X300. Event that still work (seen by acpi_listen): - ac adapter / battery - button/lid (although suspend is not triggered as expected on close) - ibm/hotkey for lcd brightness (although brightness is not actually adjusted) - ibm/hotkey for thinkvantage button Events that no longer work: - power button - volume up/down hotkeys - cannot wake up from suspend via any hotkeys/lid I'd be happy to include any other desirable information to help diagnose and fix the issue. The lack of events coming to acpid seems like a kernel or thinkpad-acpi issue but the lack of suspend-on-close and brightness adjustment seem to be userspace problems (acpi-support?). Regards, Jon Oberheide ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: acpi thinkpad x300 -- intrepid acpi issues on thinkpad x300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203679] Re: hald-addon-inpu making 100%-cpu-usage
Excellent. Any maintainers around to review/merge before Hardy? -- hald-addon-inpu making 100%-cpu-usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203679 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203679] Re: hald-addon-inpu making 100%-cpu-usage
Attached is a patch against hal's latest GIT branch. Feel free to try it out and let us know the results. ** Attachment added: possible fix to handle nval conditions http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13565547/addon-input-nval.patch -- hald-addon-inpu making 100%-cpu-usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203679 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203679] Re: hald-addon-inpu making 100%-cpu-usage
It looks like this might indeed be the case:
read(12, \335\27\10H\0\0\0\0\374L\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0, 1024) = 24
read(12, 0x6115a0, 1024)= -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN},
{fd=8, events=POLLIN}, {fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=10, events=POLLIN}, {fd=11,
events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, events=POLLIN}, {fd=3, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN},
{fd=12, events=POLLIN}], 10, -1) = 1
read(3, l\1\0\1\3\3\0\0\27\0\0\0\204\0\0\0\1\1o\0#\0\0\0/org/f..., 2048) = 923
read(3, 0x60cca0, 2048) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN},
{fd=8, events=POLLIN}, {fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=10, events=POLLIN}, {fd=11,
events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, events=POLLIN}, {fd=12, events=POLLIN}, {fd=3,
events=POLLIN}], 10, 0) = 0
close(12) = 0
writev(3, [{l\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\27\0\0\0\10\0\0\0\5\1u\0\27\0\0\0, 24}, {, 0}],
2) = 24
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN},
{fd=8, events=POLLIN}, {fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=10, events=POLLIN}, {fd=11,
events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, events=POLLIN}, {fd=12, events=POLLIN,
revents=POLLNVAL}, {fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 10, -1) = 1
fd 12 is closed via remove_device() but not removed from poll's fdset.
Therefore poll continues to return with the POLLNVAL code but it is
never handled. The POLLNVAL should be handled by adding G_IO_NVAL to
the g_io_add_watch_full() event mask and then also included in the error
condition at the top of event_io().
--
hald-addon-inpu making 100%-cpu-usage
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203679
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203679] Re: hald-addon-inpu making 100%-cpu-usage
Experiencing the same intermittently on a ThinkPad X300. The addon-input tool is pretty straightforward: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/hal/tree/hald/linux/addons/addon-input.c It's been forever since I've used GIOChannels, but it doesn't look like the channel might not be getting fully unref'ed the correct number of times. A GIOChannel starts off with a refcount of 1 when it's created and is incremented on a g_io_add_watch_full(). Normally, the event source should be removed if it's callback returns FALSE. But if there's another caller of remove_device(), the channel gets shutdown and deref'ed once but if the event source is still around the ref count will still be 1 and might result in the polling on a non-existent fd behavior that we're seeing. Then again, I'm totally rusty on GIO and am likely way off. :-) -- hald-addon-inpu making 100%-cpu-usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203679 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
