[Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Assignee: Black Mage Zeraf (blackmagezeraf) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails with Could not

[Bug 1897360] Re: package firefox-locale-de 79.0+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to make backup link of './usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack...@firefox.mozilla.org.x

2020-09-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Disk broken or kernel or dpkg bug. ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => dpkg (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897360

[Bug 1897360] Re: package firefox-locale-de 79.0+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to make backup link of './usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack...@firefox.mozilla.org.x

2020-09-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Apparently this was on a USB stick which lost power, or was removed prior to this event. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897360 Title: package firefox-locale-de

[Bug 1897360] Re: package firefox-locale-de 79.0+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to make backup link of './usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack...@firefox.mozilla.org.x

2020-09-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Squashfs corrupt, closing as invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897360 Title: package firefox-locale-de 79.0+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to make

[Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Assignee: pooria aghapour (pan2020) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails with Could not configure

[Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hey people, adding "me too" comments does not add anything useful to the bug. Please click the "affects me" kind of button at the top instead if you want to express your being affected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2020-09-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
kill(-1, SIGINT) kills all processes on the system with SIGINT, so this is hardly surprising. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871538 Title: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking

[Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2020-09-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Well, more correctly -1 means to all processes you can send to, and if you're root, well it's everyone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871538 Title: dbus timeout-ed during an

[Bug 1896823] Re: possible incorrect link to apt-transport-https

2020-09-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You made a typo in your sources.list ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** No longer affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1864223] Re: shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu1 fails to load fwupd

2020-09-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Marking this as verification done. This was a regression in focal(devel) regarding path lookup that was reverted prior to release, we have validated that this works in groovy, and the binary is the same across all releases, so this does not need per-series re-verification. -- You received this

[Bug 1864223] Re: shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu1 fails to load fwupd

2020-09-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-focal verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic verification-done-focal verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Easiest is to just look at policykit log and see that it triggers the untrusted action, fwiw. IMO. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882098 Title: Packagekit lets user install

[Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Attached patch for xenial, but I can't test it. $ pkcon install-local xterm_353-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb Installing files [=] Finished [=] Fatal error: MIME type 'application/vnd.debian.binary-package'

[Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882098 Title: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1862279] Re: arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."

2020-09-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Finally ... 4a) Verify that it's broken after rollback of grub: ``` $ sudo eatmydata apt install ~i~ngrub/focal -V [...] The following packages will be DOWNGRADED: grub-common (2.04-1ubuntu26.5 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.4) grub-efi-arm64 (2.04-1ubuntu26.5 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.4) grub-efi-arm64-bin

[Bug 1862279] Re: arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."

2020-09-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
WIP, current state: $ sudo dpkg -l grub-efi-arm64-signed shim-signed [...] ii grub-efi-arm64-signed 1.142.7+2.04-1ubuntu26.5 arm64 [...] ii shim-signed 1.40.4+15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2 arm64 [...] ubuntu@instance-1:~$ sudo mokutil --sb-state SecureBoot enabled

[Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Patch added: "0001-aptcc-Do-not-trust-local-debs-allows-root-privileges.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1882098/+attachment/5413161/+files/0001-aptcc-Do-not-trust-local-debs-allows-root-privileges.patch -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1896091] Re: [i915] graphic corruption following orkqueue: PF_MEMALLOC task 131(kswapd0) is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events_unbound:active_work [i915]

2020-09-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The corruption also happens in build 5.9.0-050900rc4drmintelnext20200915-generic but the error in dmesg does not, and it's less, it only happens on window management actions (switch window Surprisingly with that, restarting gnome-shell actually fixes the issue (it did not with normal kernel). --

[Bug 1896491] Re: Boot messages write over top of GRUB recovery menu

2020-09-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Package changed: grub2 (Ubuntu) => friendly-recovery (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896491 Title: Boot messages write over top of GRUB recovery menu To manage

[Bug 1896489] Re: UI for "drop to root shell" is confusing

2020-09-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The message is for single user mode and pressing Ctrl-D continues boot, whereas Enter enters the shell/allows maintenance. I can see it's confusing if you enter via friendly-recovery that way. ** Package changed: grub2 (Ubuntu) => friendly-recovery (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug

[Bug 1869120] Re: Shim bootloader hangs before Grub menu with 4K monitor

2020-09-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
It's already in focal-proposed, hence I mentioned proposed pocket. Anyway it's fixed in groovy, so marking done. ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1896288] Re: Event hash and digest mismatch for event logged by shim - Binary BIOS Measurements

2020-09-19 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: shim (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896288 Title: Event hash and digest mismatch for event logged by shim - Binary BIOS

[Bug 1865515] Re: Chainbooting from grub over the network to local shim breaks chain of trust

2020-09-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I'll try to implement one last hack, and maybe that works, and is acceptable enough that everyone picks it this year. We'll see. It's a bit unfortunate the issue is in the second shim failing to unload the first shim, as otherwise, we'd only need a fixed maas shim :/ -- You received this bug

[Bug 1865515] Re: Chainbooting from grub over the network to local shim breaks chain of trust

2020-09-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
As a workaround, MAAS may for the time being, chainload EFI/ubuntu/grubx64.efi when the goal is to securely boot Ubuntu systems. Secure boot for other systems will require work on those other systems, once we have the patches available upstream, and is hopefully ready by 21.04, but other distros

[Bug 1896095] [NEW] apport no longer attaches dmesg, as dmesg is restricted in groovy

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: I reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1896091 but it was incomplete because apparently apport can no longer collect dmesg log now that it is restricted in groovy. This means you can't report complete kernel bugs, and the instructions provided by the

[Bug 1896091] Re: [i915] graphic corruption following orkqueue: PF_MEMALLOC task 131(kswapd0) is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events_unbound:active_work [i915]

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Attached dmesg from journalctl. To the best of my knowledge, this is all that's missing, as apport now has no raw dmesg access anymore and missed to upload the dmesg. ** Attachment added: "kernel.log"

[Bug 1896091] Re: [i915] graphic corruption following orkqueue: PF_MEMALLOC task 131(kswapd0) is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events_unbound:active_work [i915]

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Attached dmesg from journalctl. To the best of my knowledge, this is all that's missing, as apport now has no raw dmesg access anymore and missed to upload the dmesg. ** Attachment added: "kernel.log"

[Bug 1896091] UdevDb.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411760/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091 Title:

[Bug 1896091] RfKill.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411759/+files/RfKill.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091 Title:

[Bug 1896091] WifiSyslog.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411761/+files/WifiSyslog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091

[Bug 1896091] acpidump.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "acpidump.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411762/+files/acpidump.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091

[Bug 1896091] Re: [i915] graphic corruption following orkqueue: PF_MEMALLOC task 131(kswapd0) is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events_unbound:active_work [i915]

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: I left my desktop (T480s thinkpad docked to ThinkVision P24h-10) unattended for a while, and then got the error message and now have funny lines on activity, e.g. red lines flashing on top of gnome-shell bar when

[Bug 1896091] Lsusb-t.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb-t.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411751/+files/Lsusb-t.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091 Title:

[Bug 1896091] Lsusb-v.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb-v.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411752/+files/Lsusb-v.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091 Title:

[Bug 1896091] ProcEnviron.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411755/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091

[Bug 1896091] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411754/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1896091] IwConfig.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411747/+files/IwConfig.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091

[Bug 1896091] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411753/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091

[Bug 1896091] CRDA.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411746/+files/CRDA.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091 Title:

[Bug 1896091] Lspci-vt.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci-vt.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411749/+files/Lspci-vt.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091

[Bug 1896091] PulseList.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411758/+files/PulseList.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091

[Bug 1896091] Lspci.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411748/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091 Title:

[Bug 1896091] ProcModules.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411757/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091

[Bug 1896091] Lsusb.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411750/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091 Title:

[Bug 1896091] ProcInterrupts.txt

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091/+attachment/5411756/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1896091] Re: [i915] graphic corruption following orkqueue: PF_MEMALLOC task 131(kswapd0) is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events_unbound:active_work [i915]

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
That said, hmm, it took an hour or so after the backtrace for it to cause visual distortion or I misremember, or it gets worse over time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091 Title:

[Bug 1896091] [NEW] [i915] graphic corruption following orkqueue: PF_MEMALLOC task 131(kswapd0) is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events_unbound:active_work [i915]

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: I left my desktop (T480s thinkpad docked to ThinkVision P24h-10) unattended for a while, and then got the error message and now have funny lines on activity, e.g. red lines flashing on top of gnome-shell bar when switching windows, or white blocks/lines around typing text.

[Bug 1865515] Re: Chainbooting from grub over the network to local shim breaks chain of trust

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Bug watch added: github.com/rhboot/shim/issues #221 https://github.com/rhboot/shim/issues/221 ** Also affects: shim via https://github.com/rhboot/shim/issues/221 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1865515] Re: Chainbooting from grub over the network to local shim breaks chain of trust

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Further analysis today suggests the issue is that shim never uninstalls the old shim protocols, and then things get weird. Patching shim to call to the parent shim to uninstall itself, rather than falsely attempting to uninstall it ourselves, makes it work, but it's just a hack so far. We can

[Bug 1813598] Re: syslinux ftbfs in 18.04 LTS

2020-09-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This seems to be fixed. ** Changed in: syslinux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813598 Title: syslinux ftbfs in 18.04 LTS To manage

[Bug 1869120] Re: Shim bootloader hangs before Grub menu with 4K monitor

2020-09-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Is this still an issue with shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2 from the proposed pocket/groovy? ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1895869] Re: package grub-efi-amd64 2.04-1ubuntu26.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10

2020-09-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Thanks for your bug report. Unfortunately, there is no error message in the output. Can you run dpkg --configure -a to try configure again and attach the output if there is an error in there? Or you might have to run apt install -f if dpkg --configure -a does not attempt to configure

[Bug 1890813] Re: [bionic] Build shim-signed:arm64

2020-09-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** No longer affects: shim-signed (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890813 Title: [bionic] Build

[Bug 1870955] Re: MokManager - Only DER encoded certificate (*.cer/der/crt) is supported

2020-09-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
My understanding from vorlon's comment is that this is fixed in current shim in groovy (and releases' -proposed pockets), so closing. ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1811722] Re: arm64: shim crashes in SecureBoot mode w/ some firmware

2020-09-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811722 Title: arm64: shim crashes in SecureBoot mode w/ some firmware

[Bug 1793894] Re: bootia32.efi + 32bit UEFI + SecureBoot => not signed properly

2020-09-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We do not support 32-bit UEFI. ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793894 Title: bootia32.efi + 32bit UEFI + SecureBoot

[Bug 1862279] Re: arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."

2020-09-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1877861] Re: When installing grub to multiple EFI partitions they all have the same label in the EFI vars

2020-09-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Luckily the boot order is, well, ordered, so you can figure out where the error was once you successfully booted, by looking at efibootmgr and investigating. You need to get it booted anyway, so this hardly seems more effort. We could change the entry to say "ubuntu on on 512110 MB SAMSUNG

[Bug 1895382] Re: Ability to install 2 or more versions at once

2020-09-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Also, the language you have chosen for that comment is inappropriate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895382 Title: Ability to install 2 or more versions at once To manage

[Bug 1895382] Re: Ability to install 2 or more versions at once

2020-09-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The bug is about "Ability to install 2 or more versions at once", the rest was incomprehensible -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895382 Title: Ability to install 2 or more versions at

[Bug 1895382] Re: Ability to install 2 or more versions at once

2020-09-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The bug description states: 1) do not ask questions with two identical answers in a row 2) ask user every time if multiple versions are present 3) if the same answer was given twice in a row - remember choice I have no idea what that means, it also has no relation to the bug title. Flatpak and

[Bug 1895382] Re: Ability to install 2 or more versions at once

2020-09-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You can't install multiple versions at the same time for dpkg/apt, but you can with snaps, don't know about flatpaks - talk to flatpak people. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1875166] Re: grub-efi-amd64.postinst not running grub-install when GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR changed

2020-09-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This got fixed as a side effect of the grub multi ESP code. kubuntu is special cased in the code to install to ubuntu. So it is expected that there is no change in directory. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1877861] Re: When installing grub to multiple EFI partitions they all have the same label in the EFI vars

2020-09-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I don't believe there is a need for different labels, or a good kind of ID to display, even. The use case of the code is for raid1 where each disk in the raid1 mirror contains the same ESP, so they are all functionally equivalent - the point is that you can fallback to another if one of the disk

[Bug 1862279] Re: arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."

2020-09-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: [Impact] Kernels are not loaded on arm64 since grub2 2.04 rebase [Test case] 1. Boot qemu qemu-system-aarch64 -m 1024 -cpu cortex-a53 -M virt -pflash ~/AAVMF_CODE.fd -pflash ~/AAVMF_VARS.fd -drive

[Bug 1862279] Re: arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image."

2020-09-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: - I tested out the new shim-signed (1.41+15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu1) - on arm64 today. Unfortunately, I was unable to boot a kernel. I tried - manually running commands in the GRUB shell to try and get more info, - and here's the error I get: + [Impact] + Kernels are

[Bug 1862171] Re: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2

2020-09-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Sweet. Yeah that message was the plan. It should also do stuff like mount /proc and cat /proc/cmdline and tell you secure boot state and such from inside the kernel. Such that we check that too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1865515] Re: Chainbooting from grub over the network to local shim breaks chain of trust

2020-09-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The problem seems to be caused by having two shims, as we get the "Bootloader has not verified loaded image" messages when loading this way, but if we instead chainload the local grub directly, things work. So it seems like local shim does not correctly uninstall and replace remote shim protocol

[Bug 1865515] Re: Chainbooting from grub over the network to local shim breaks chain of trust

2020-09-09 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I could reproduce this by modifying my shim netboot testing script in bug 1862171 to add a local hard disk to the VM, and then run chainloader (hd0,gpt1)/efi/ubuntu/shimx64.efi, and boot; which successfully loads grub, but kernel then reports it is compromised. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1843340] Re: Boot menu not displayed for multi boot with ZFS

2020-09-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
That's correct, the menu should not show automatically, you either configure it to do so or you press Esc during boot. Marking as invalid. ** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1862171] Re: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2

2020-09-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
(xnox tested chainloading windows now too) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862171 Title: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1862171] Re: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2

2020-09-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
here's a log even for xenial, so it's visible how the tests are coalesced: - Enroll MOK with timeout 66 - OK - disable validation - OK - reenable validation with timeout -1 (completes mokutil timeout test) - OK - reset MOK - OK This means xenial passed too, weeehh (1.33.1~16.04.6). ** Tags

[Bug 1862171] Re: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2

2020-09-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
shim-signed/bionic=1.37~18.04.8 is good. I coalesced some of the timeout tests with the other reset tests to reduce the number of reboots needed, and it was nicer :) ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1890813] Re: [bionic] Build shim-signed:arm64

2020-09-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We can't test that, as stated in bug, so marking verified given that the binaries are there. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1862171] Re: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2

2020-09-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I've not verified Windows chainloading (which xnox did for 0ubuntu1, and we only had a tiny patch on top), or MAAS, as those are not really feasible for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1862171] Re: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2

2020-09-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Presumably the binaries work OK enough for MAAS, as they've been in groovy for quite a while now. That said, MAAS also has a lot of failures on the grub side, so verifying is probably not even possible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1864223] Re: shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu1 fails to load fwupd

2020-09-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: + (this is a regression of shim in groovy, fixed by new upstream release, + it can serve as regression test case for 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2 + SRU) + The latest shim upload does not seem able to load fwupd. Selecting fwupd in BIOS boot menu seems to go directly

[Bug 1862171] Re: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2

2020-09-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
So this means focal (shim-signed 1.40.4) as done. fwupd is tracked in bug 1864223. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862171 Title: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2 To manage

[Bug 1862171] Re: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2

2020-09-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Verified the MokManager and mokutil tests on focal ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862171 Title:

[Bug 1894589] Re: After grub updates the video display is wrong

2020-09-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There were no changes in that grub update affecting normal boot, only microcode loading was disabled for recovery boots and a feature to reorder kernels was added. ** Package changed: grub2 (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1089070] Re: Could not open file /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_quantal_main_binary-amd64_Packages - open (24: Too many open files)

2020-09-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Check that you have less files in /var/lib/apt/lists than ulimit -n has a value. You probably have too many repositories or too low a ulimit. Otherwise, open a new bug with ubuntu-bug/apport. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1893833] Re: grub does not initialize display

2020-09-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Are you booting in BIOS mode? Can you boot in UEFI mode? Did this work in an older release? ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1831789] Re: Add "dis_ucode_ldr" to linux boot options for Recovery Mode

2020-09-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
It's not built for those architectures in release pocket either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831789 Title: Add "dis_ucode_ldr" to linux boot options for Recovery Mode To manage

[Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-03 Thread Julian Andres Klode
It asks apt if the package is trusted, and from apt's POV it is. which might or might not be good, UX wise, for apt (maybe it should also tell you that local debs are not verified), but not much of an issue there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1876258] Re: ubuntu 20.04 pxe installation fails with no such file or directory /dev/disk/by-id exception

2020-09-03 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I don't believe there is a grub task here, as grub can fall back to plain device names, so closing this task. ** Tags removed: rls-gg-incoming ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1862171] Re: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2

2020-09-03 Thread Julian Andres Klode
netboot - testing the new shim binaries against stable release grubs using PXE boot xenial, bionic, and focal all pass the tests netboot - booted to kernel ✓ netboot-unsigned-grub - unsigned grub rejected - "security violation" ✓ netboot-unsigned-kernel - unsigned kernel rejected / not loaded ✓

[Bug 1893495] Re: package shim-signed 1.37~18.04.6+15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit statu

2020-09-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Notably the upgrade seems to have been from xenial _release pocket_ to bionic with updates enabled, which is not supportable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893495 Title: package

[Bug 1862171] Re: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2

2020-09-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
shim booting, desktop inside secureboot VM: focal ✓ bionic ✓ xenial ✓ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862171 Title: [SRU] shim 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2 To manage

[Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-09-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I found out the cause for this, but other backends are affected too probably - basically the packagekit daemon assumes that packages can be trusted themselves, so backends that do not have trust information in packages need to explicitly reject local packages as untrusted, so that PackageKit

[Bug 1591672] Re: update-manager does not obey require-password policy

2020-09-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Checking some more I cannot reproduce this from update-manager either, in xenial even, with the pkla file saying "sudo" in addition to "admin", so I assume this was misconfigured locally (user in sudo group, but auth_admin override for admin group). My understanding is that the sudo group

[Bug 1591672] Re: update-manager does not obey require-password policy

2020-09-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Actually, I can't upgrade from aptdcon, but I can upgrade from update- manager, hmm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591672 Title: update-manager does not obey require-password policy

[Bug 1591672] Re: update-manager does not obey require-password policy

2020-09-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
After changing the group to unix-group:sudo I could not reproduce this bug. Are you sure the user you tested this for was only in the admin group and not the sudo group (which is also given permission to upgrade without password)? [Update already installed software]

[Bug 1591672] Re: update-manager does not obey require-password policy

2020-09-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Um I tested on groovy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591672 Title: update-manager does not obey require-password policy To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1591672] Re: update-manager does not obey require-password policy

2020-09-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
(That policy quoted above was the default rule in 16.04 BTW) I tested on focal, but I can check xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591672 Title: update-manager does not obey

[Bug 1893673] Re: package grub-efi-amd64 2.02-2ubuntu8.17 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 255

2020-08-31 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There are no error messages in the provided log files. Please run dpkg --configure -a, and apt full-upgrade to continue the upgrade until there is an error message. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1591672] Re: update-manager does not obey require-password policy

2020-08-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
aptdaemon does not seem to check policykit or something, I created the file and could still upgrade with aptdcon --upgrade ** Package changed: update-manager (Ubuntu) => aptdaemon (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1890438] Re: Ubuntu Groovy proposed:networkd-dispatcher.service ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'glib'

2020-08-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The correct depends are all there. Depends: dbus, gir1.2-glib-2.0, python3-dbus, python3-gi, python3:any Hence from gi.repository import GLib should work. @kortewegdevries You really shouldn't install stuff via pip, maybe an earlier pip run broke it? ** Changed in: networkd-dispatcher (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1882098] Re: Packagekit lets user install untrusted local packages in Bionic and Focal

2020-08-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Yup, install-local does indeed trigger package-install not package- install-untrusted Aug 28 11:28:53 jak-t480s polkitd(authority=local)[1744]: Operator of unix-session:2 FAILED to authenticate to gain authorization for action org.freedesktop.packagekit.package-install for system-bus-name::1.535

[Bug 1831789] Re: Add "dis_ucode_ldr" to linux boot options for Recovery Mode

2020-08-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
grubzfs-testsuite 0.4.10.1 has passed its autopkgtest, hence verified ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1882663] Re: Specify flavour ordering

2020-08-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Um, this was xenial and grub ubuntu3.28 ** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882663 Title: Specify

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >