[Bug 915080]
repro 7.2+. Also true for DOCX. A TableOfContents is a semi-section in Writer, so probably that is throwing things off during export. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915080 Title: [Upstream] Column formatting not honored saving to .doc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/915080/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915080]
Created attachment 171194 45386_example.doc: the document mentioned in comment 0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915080 Title: [Upstream] Column formatting not honored saving to .doc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/915080/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462564]
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #24) > What if we didn't bother with the complicated cases We already don't bother with the complicated case, that is why we have this bug report. This bug is complicated because it contains merged cells. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462564 Title: [Upstream] Deleting a column in Writer deletes whole table To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/462564/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462564]
There is some good discussion in the linked OOo bug report on this. Paraphrasing fyva... > For tables with merged cells, there are no columns or rows, there are only > cells. When you select a few cells and click "delete row" or "delete column", > you can't delete neither a row nor a column (there are no rows, no columns), > you can either delete the whole table or merge the cells with right, left, > upper or lower cells, by your choice, because each cell have a lot of adjacent > cells. This gets really complicated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462564 Title: [Upstream] Deleting a column in Writer deletes whole table To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/462564/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1082110]
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #17) > this is fixed with resolving bug 124601 This has to be a mistake. That bug has nothing to do with endnotes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082110 Title: [Upstream] Endnote placed at end of document is unmovable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1082110/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 873287]
Fixed in LO 7.0 by commit 38e7e6f348df5d6b37d7e0051fd3b8c227db69e6 Author: Justin Luth on Tue Apr 14 17:39:36 2020 +0300 tdf#132094 doc: fix export of fill in wrap-through fly frames This builds on commit 2f13dbac060ae6af7e25ad3eff675cc859cfb3ff by Miklos Vajna on Fri Jun 15 08:49:46 2012 +0100 n#325936 fix ww8 export of fly frames with transparent bg where he wisely and cautiously says Regression from commit ed8b5f2d -- to be safe, reverted only for fly frames in headers. because for some unknown reason, way back in 2002, commit ed8b5f2debac216243930aba0873e0d75de8d0dd forced all frames to specify a background fill. Typically of course this is white, and so who notices? Well, you notice if your frame is transparent, and now the area fill hides something that it is over top of. Like for example a transparent image, where the text wraps through the image. At first I was going to just try and revert everything. Then I decided it likely was a difference between how LO and MSO handled stacking/overlapping things. After that, I was going to just make an exception for eShapeType == mso_sptPictureFrame, but that only seems necessary if there is something underneath. If the something is just a background, that is handled anyway, so really it would only be other shapes or (most importantly) text, so the safest thing is testing wrap through, which there was already a pre-defined variable to reuse (and fix the spelling). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 132094 *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873287 Title: [Upstream] Writer Picture Background No Fill does not persist saving to .doc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/873287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 897235]
OK - so I think this report is focusing on the three textboxes near the middle of the document, where the first one is a bit left compared to the others. The three are not lined up.left-aligned. It appears to me that the reason is because the first one is wider than the others - in fact it goes right to the edge of the paper. In Word the textbox spills off the end of the page. So that would be the reason - that LO makes the sane decision that content MUST fit on the paper. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897235 Title: [Upstream] Rounded rectangle corners are indented importing Word .doc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/897235/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1877970] Re: Alt-X keyboard shortcut not defined in LibreOffice 6.4
I confirmed with Debian testing that they install LO 6.4.3, and that alt-x works in there. So what I see agrees with Sebastien. There is good reason to believe that this will be fixed in 6.4.4 with Don't use main.xcd configured with --disable-gui (LP: #1869561) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877970 Title: Alt-X keyboard shortcut not defined in LibreOffice 6.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1877970/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1877970] Re: Alt-X keyboard shortcut not defined in LibreOffice 6.4
I tried looking in launchpad's patches, but don't see anything that specifically strips it out, so I imagine it must be related to a compile flag. In previous versions, it seems to be specified in [/usr/lib/libreoffice]share/registry/main.xcd - from which it is now missing. .uno:UnicodeNotationToggle value xml:lang="pt-BR"/> -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877970 Title: Alt-X keyboard shortcut not defined in LibreOffice 6.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1877970/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1877970] [NEW] Alt-X keyboard shortcut not defined in LibreOffice 6.4
Public bug reported: LibreOffice has default keyboard shortcuts defined. In Ubuntu 20.04 and LibreOffice 6.4, it seems like some of those keyboard shortcuts are missing. Specifically I was looking for Alt-X (for LibreOffice in general, not only writer). Alt-X is defined by default in a LibreOffice source compile. These can be configured in LibreOffice tools -> customize - keyboard ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libreoffice (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-29.33-generic 5.4.30 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-29-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Mon May 11 04:45:55 2020 InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-11 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ** Attachment added: "screenshot when Alt-X is configured" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877970/+attachment/5369794/+files/LO%20default%20keyboard%20shortcut%20ALT-X.png ** Summary changed: - approximately no keyboard shortcuts defined in LibreOffice 6.4 + Alt-X keyboard shortcuts not defined in LibreOffice 6.4 ** Summary changed: - Alt-X keyboard shortcuts not defined in LibreOffice 6.4 + Alt-X keyboard shortcut not defined in LibreOffice 6.4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877970 Title: Alt-X keyboard shortcut not defined in LibreOffice 6.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1877970/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 897597]
repro 7.0+ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897597 Title: [Upstream] Unable to edit text in textboxes from Word .doc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/897597/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1280794] Re: Can't change default "Open with" application
I saw a similar problem in 16.04 with PDFs being opened with ImageMagick. Trying to open With Document Viewer and set that as the default made no change. I saw in mimeapps.list that there was both an image/pdf and an applications/pdf entry. I removed the image/pdf entry that pointed to ImageMagick, and left the very last entry in the file, which was the applications/pdf entry with Evince. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280794 Title: Can't change default "Open with" application To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1280794/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1753115] [NEW] add-apt-repository documentation does not mention --no-updates option
Public bug reported: The default has changed so that --updates is the default. The man page should be updated to reflect that and to document the -n --no-updates option for 18.04 ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: bionic ** Tags added: bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753115 Title: add-apt-repository documentation does not mention --no-updates option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1753115/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1753115] Re: add-apt-repository documentation does not mention --no-updates option
related to 1559482 add-apt-repository manpage does not mention new -u option -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753115 Title: add-apt-repository documentation does not mention --no-updates option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1753115/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1732447] [NEW] rename no longer included in perl package, but still linked
Public bug reported: typing "rename" in a terminal responds with... The program 'rename' can be found in the following packages: * perl * rename Ask your administrator to install one of them ...but perl is already installed. Internet reports suggest this has started in 17.10. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: perl 5.26.0-8ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Nov 15 16:24:29 2017 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash LC_PAPER=en_GB.UTF-8 SourcePackage: perl UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1732447 Title: rename no longer included in perl package, but still linked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+bug/1732447/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1102354] Re: Impossible for non-administrator users to connect to new wireless networks
Still a problem in Bionic Beaver development. In the past you could work around it by going into network properties, and manually adding a network, being careful to uncheck the "make it available for all users" option. I couldn't work around it in Bionic. But the point is that you shouldn't have to "work around" anything. A normal user should be able to follow the simple process of selecting the wireless and being prompted to connect and save the password just for himself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1102354 Title: Impossible for non-administrator users to connect to new wireless networks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1102354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1537645] Re: logname returns "logname: no login name" with gnome-terminal
** Description changed: - Logname only displays this problem in Xenial Unity. I expected it to - return my login name. It works in gnome-shell and mate editions of - Ubuntu. Only a problem with gnome-terminal. It works in xterm and - uxterm and in tty1. + Logname fails to return a login name in Xenial Unity. I expected it to + return my login name (especially when running as "sudo"). Strangely, it + works in gnome-shell and mate editions of Xenial. - Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release 16.04 + It is only a problem with gnome-terminal. It works in xterm and uxterm + and in tty1... + + Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release 16.04. + + logname is unique because it returns the underlying username (and not + root) when in sudo mode, so this utility is fairly critical and cannot + be substituted with whoami or id -un or any other command that I know + of. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537645 Title: logname returns "logname: no login name" with gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1537645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1537645] [NEW] logname returns "logname: no login name" with gnome-terminal
Public bug reported: Logname only displays this problem in Xenial Unity. I expected it to return my login name. It works in gnome-shell and mate editions of Ubuntu. Only a problem with gnome-terminal. It works in xterm and uxterm and in tty1. Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release 16.04 ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537645 Title: logname returns "logname: no login name" with gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1537645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
