[Bug 140703] Re: UVF exception: OpenOffice.org 2.3.0 (gutsy)
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Assignee: Cal Christie (calc) = Ubuntu Sponsors for main (ubuntu-main-sponsors) -- UVF exception: OpenOffice.org 2.3.0 (gutsy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 140703] UVF exception: OpenOffice.org 2.3.0 (gutsy)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org New Version: 2.3.0 (build OOG680_m5) Current Version: 2.3.0~rc1 (build OOG680_m1) Update Description: Available for download now, OpenOffice.org 2.3 incorporates an extensive array of new features and enhancements to all its core components, and protects users from newly discovered security vulnerabilities. It is a major release and all users should download it. Release Notes: http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.3.0.html Download: http://download.openoffice.org/2.3.0/index.html?focus=download -- Open Office is the main Office application suit in use on Ubuntu (and derivative) systems. As such it is clearly beneficial to the end-user to have the most current and stable release possible. Currently a release candidate sits within Gutsy, this should be upgraded to the final release for stability and functional purposes. With the Ubuntu 7.10 beta approaching, there will be plenty of large scale testing of the newest version of Open Office (as long as the new release is included in the beta), allowing concrete user-testing to be done. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: uvfe ** Description changed: Binary package hint: openoffice.org - Package: OpenOffice.org New Version: 2.3.0 (build OOG680_m5) Current Version: 2.3.0~rc1 (build OOG680_m1) - Release Notes: Available for download now, OpenOffice.org 2.3 + Update Description: Available for download now, OpenOffice.org 2.3 incorporates an extensive array of new features and enhancements to all its core components, and protects users from newly discovered security vulnerabilities. It is a major release and all users should download it. + + Release Notes: http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.3.0.html + Download: http://download.openoffice.org/2.3.0/index.html?focus=download -- Open Office is the main Office application suit in use on Ubuntu (and derivative) systems. As such it is clearly beneficial to the end-user to have the most current and stable release possible. Currently a release candidate sits within Gutsy, this should be upgraded to the final release for stability and functional purposes. With the Ubuntu 7.10 beta approaching, there will be plenty of large scale testing of the newest version of Open Office (as long as the new release is included in the beta), allowing concrete user-testing to be done. ** Tags added: uvfe -- UVF exception: OpenOffice.org 2.3.0 (gutsy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139081] Re: (gutsy) pidgin exits when changing buddy icon
** Changed in: pidgin (Ubuntu) Assignee: Justin M. Wray = (unassigned) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- (gutsy) pidgin exits when changing buddy icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139102] Re: Firefox randomly crashes
** Tags added: mt-needsummary -- Firefox randomly crashes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139095] Re: firefox segfaults on dual head on gutsy
Thank you for the bug report. Also, please answer these questions: Is this crash reproducible? If so, which are the steps that lead to it? Which flash package do you have installed? Which Java package do you have installed? Which firefox extensions do you have installed? This will greatly aid us in tracking down your problem. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Incomplete ** Tags added: mt-needsummary -- firefox segfaults on dual head on gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139095 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139081] Re: (gutsy) pidgin exits when changing buddy icon
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please try to obtain a backtrace following the instructions at [WWW] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash and upload the backtrace (as an attachment) to the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem. ** Changed in: pidgin (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Incomplete -- (gutsy) pidgin exits when changing buddy icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139102] Re: Firefox randomly crashes
Thank you for the bug report. Also, please answer these questions: Is this crash reproducible? If so, which are the steps that lead to it? Which flash package do you have installed? Which Java package do you have installed? Which firefox extensions do you have installed? This will greatly aid us in tracking down your problem. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray -- Firefox randomly crashes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139024] Re: nvidia binary driver will not work anymore
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Confirmed -- nvidia binary driver will not work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139024 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139033] Re: Wrong path of lsof for Ubuntu Gutsy
** Changed in: dvd-slideshow (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Wrong path of lsof for Ubuntu Gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139033 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139032] Re: FATAL: Error running install command for nvidia
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- FATAL: Error running install command for nvidia https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108959] Re: [needs-packaging] kiba-dock: Package request
No this will be set for gutsy+1 (Hardy). Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] kiba-dock: Package request https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129081] Re: [needs-packaging] Mumble
Sorry for the delay in my response, extended holiday this past weekend. Justin, what are your plans on this? You wanted to do this, but I haven't seen much interest from your side. Cesare, I am absolutely interested in packaging the next released version mumble for Hardy. Unfortunitally working on other packages, delayed my attention on this one. Either way, we no have plenty of time to work out issues with other packages such as 'speex' and fix upstream issues like the debian/ directory. About the 18 months; The 1.0 (current release) and 1.1.x (SVN) branches of mumble are protocol incompatible. 1.0 uses a unencrypted protocol while 1.1 uses SSL sockets. Support for SSL in Qt requires Qt 4.3. Qt 4.3 requires Gutsy, so it was our plan to release Mumble 1.1.0 a day or so after the Gutsy release. If you're looking at the 8.04 dev cycle already, I'd strongly recommend waiting and using the 1.1 branch there, because 1.0 will be obsolete on October 18th ;) This obviously gears a release towards a Hardy release anyway. I think once the timeline is published we should work on a stable (updated) release for inclusion, knowing the date of the NPF will give us a solid target. Keep in mind though that Hardy is supposed to be a LTS and therefore we should really ensure that this is a stable package, and not bleeding edge. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Mumble https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133827] Re: apt-get tells me package 'vim' contains gvim, but does it?
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- apt-get tells me package 'vim' contains gvim, but does it? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133827 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 130431] Re: compiz causes libgtkglext examples to crash (gutsy)
** Changed in: gtkglext (Ubuntu) Assignee: Justin M. Wray = (unassigned) -- compiz causes libgtkglext examples to crash (gutsy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130431 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134310] Re: [nvidia-glx-legacy] GeForce2 Go + Nvidia driver causing system freezes unless cpu scaling is disabled
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Justin M. Wray = (unassigned) -- [nvidia-glx-legacy] GeForce2 Go + Nvidia driver causing system freezes unless cpu scaling is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134310 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 127624] Re: [bcm43xx-fwcutter] Failed Download - 404
** Changed in: bcm43xx-fwcutter (Ubuntu) Assignee: Justin M. Wray = (unassigned) -- [bcm43xx-fwcutter] Failed Download - 404 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 136376] Re: automatic update for mozilla-flashplayer make using flashplayer impossible
Thank you for the bug report. Also, please answer these questions: Which version of firefox are you running? Which flash package do you have installed? Which Java package do you have installed? Which firefox extensions do you have installed? This will greatly aid us in tracking down your problem. ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Incomplete -- automatic update for mozilla-flashplayer make using flashplayer impossible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136376 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Fwd: Fwd: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
Just an update, we are working with the metasploit team, to hammer out some of the issues with the current package, etc. Please see the below email for communication between myself and the team-lead. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- Forwarded message -- From: Justin Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Aug 30, 2007 10:01 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) To: H D Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Moore: With your permission, I would like to post your comments (as well as mine) to our bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/102212 ) so others outside of this thread (including the package approvers) can keep track of our status. On 8/29/07, H D Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Justin, We can likely help with some of these in the future, but there are some things that we should clarify: I appriciate your willingness to help, and look forward to working with you and the rest of the metasploit team. 1) We will continue to use Subversion as a system for performing online updates. This means any distribution will always contain .svn directories. One solution, for a packager, is to give each user their own Metasploit 3 installation and provide a script which extracts this package and configures PATH/symlinks during the first use. This is how Metasploit 3.1 will work on Windows and a simple way to avoid having Subversion modify system-wide directories. I like the idea of each user having their own installation. Not only does it alleviate any issues implied by SVN and system-wide directories, but it also allows each user to keep their own patch level, and more importantly their own exploits. This then allows them to download third-party exploits (milw0rm and the like) and even write their own, without the fear of interfering with other users on the system. As such I will see what we can do about packaging metasploit in such a way, and at the same time keep the SVN update ability. 2) The license may change in the future, but we have no timeline set and no requirements to be compatible with debian-legal. For what its worth, our license was written by a lawyer and then reviewed again by a second legal team as a sanity check. The license stipulations are standard for EULAs and are not in line with what most folks consider open source. We understand that this doesn't make packaging easy, but allowing other people to distribute our software has not been a priority. This makes perfect sence, as does the motive behind such a restrictive license. However, this will cause the license to fall under the non-free category. Which requires a bit more user interaction and fore-thought in order to install. Thus it may scare some users away from trying metasploit, then again, if they do not know what metasploit is, they will most likely not be using it in the first place. Which I do not see as a bad thing. The major license issues we are having: * Limited ability to redistribute * The inability to redistribute changes (patches, etc) I understand that redistribution has not been a priority, and this honestly is a bunch of bureaucracy that hinders productivity, all licenses are. But allowing distributions (Ubuntu, Fedora, Suse, Backtrack) the ability to package should be something that is looked at, when the next license review comes along. The majority of users (even those who use metasploit) are far more comfortable installing packages from the distributions repositories. Some will go as far as requesting an application to be packaged and added to the distribution before they will install. It allows the user to keep a clean system and easily update all the applications. Dependencies are handled, updates are provided, and configuration complete, it makes installation painless. I also understand the wish to protect metasploit from re-branded and re-packaging. But there is ways to allow distribution of changes, while still retaining original copyright, name/branding, and maintainers etc. Thus protecting metasploit from thief but still allowing Ubuntu and others to make needed changes in order to have metasploit integrate cleanly into the distribution. 3) Splitting the package in a way that core, gui, web, and data is separate will not happen. Exploit modules often depend on updates to the libraries and APIs. At some point, we may freeze the API or enforce a versioning system, but at this team the code is inter-dependent. Our intentions on this were two fold. First users may or may not want the web interface, or the gui. Others may just run the web interface, and some may only use the gui. It truly depends on the user, and each has different motives, experience, and opinions. Spiliting the package up allowed the user to control which part of metasploit was on the systems, those who never use the gui can easily leave it and the (then) un-needed
[Bug 132954] Re: APT errors after failed bcm43xx-fwcutter install
Setting as closed/fixed. If you are still having issues, please let me know. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: bcm43xx-fwcutter (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- APT errors after failed bcm43xx-fwcutter install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
Set to incomplete as further packaging/license issues are worked out. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Fix Committed = Incomplete -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
Kristian: Thank you for following-up in #ubuntu-motu as I have been busy the past few evenings. As I assumed would happen, the package has been rejected. This is obviously due to the multiple errors and issues that we were having (and unable to resolve due to the license). Unless we have these issues resolved today/tomorrow metasploit will not make it into the Gutsy release. We need to speak with the MSF Dev team a bit further and see what we can do. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135584] Re: default theme in Ubuntu is a huge mistake
Thank you for your suggestion. However, the changes you are requesting aren't really a bug and require more discussion (although this has been discussed before), which should be done on an appropriate mailing list or forum. http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community/mailinglists might be a good start for determining which mailing list to use. In addition, you can change your theme, if you would like assistance doing so, please see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuEyeCandy or post further questions at https://answers.launchpad.net/ Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- default theme in Ubuntu is a huge mistake https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135584 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109822] Re: [needs-packaging] moblock (peerguardian for linux)
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- [needs-packaging] moblock (peerguardian for linux) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108686] Re: [needs-packaging] gfire (Xfire for gaim) not in universe
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- [needs-packaging] gfire (Xfire for gaim) not in universe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129081] Re: [needs-packaging] Mumble
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- [needs-packaging] Mumble https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete = In Progress -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
I said that .svn dirs must be removed ;) A package for being accepted must be lintian *clean*, so i think, as i prev said: 1) we get a good package from dev team 2) we get an execption from ubuntu-dev Completely agree, we were just trying to see if we could get past this for the time being. I think the best solution is as follows: 1) We split metasploit into the following packages - * metasploit-core (Containing all the core components, including CLI) * metasploit-web (Containing all of the msfweb files) * metasploit-gui (Containing all of the msfgui and needed files) * metasploit-data (Containing all exploits, modules, etc.) 2) Offer a way to automatically update the exploits and modules only (leaving core, web, and gui to be updated in future releases or with security concerns). Although we need to discuss how this should be approached, specific SVN, repackaging to the archive, a download script, etc. The problem again, is how to we gain the ability to do such. The options are MSF distributes the upstream package as we have outlined above, or they allow an exception to the license that grants Ubuntu the right to modify the package and distribute in the way stated above. But it is a long shot that they would repackage just to please one distro (even though other distros could benefit from such a release). Worse it is unlikely any license exception or change will be seen until the next major release which should be accompanied by a new license. Which leaves us hanging without a metasploit release again...feedback? I wonder if the MSF team would be willing to create a separate SVN trunk for Ubuntu specifically, in which they release under the layout above? Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
I won't work on this any more. I would strongly encourage you not to abandon this effort. As the only way to resolve this issue is to work harder, and obviously closer to the MSF Dev team. And I would like to think they do want to see their product released within the Ubuntu repositories. shows me that people care about what packages make it into the repositories and results in a high quality system for the users I think that has been a selling point for Debian/Ubuntu for years... I'll forward my comments to the metasploit team, and see what we can do... Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106239] Re: [needs-packaging] qtpfsgui
Just a side note (as per your last comment), https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClosingBugsFromChangelog PS - Great job getting qtpfsgui in the archive. I'll be downloading tonight. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] qtpfsgui https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134310] Re: [nvidia-glx-legacy] GeForce2 Go + Nvidia driver causing system freezes unless cpu scaling is disabled
** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [nvidia-glx-legacy] GeForce2 Go + Nvidia driver causing system freezes unless cpu scaling is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134310 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
** Summary changed: - [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 + [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
Not yet, I have uploaded to my PPA, (not sure the status of that system yet). I will upload to REVU now...time to face the fire. Thanks for all of the assistance. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129081] Fwd: [ mumble-Bugs-1781152 ] Release Cleanup (debain/)
Working with upstream to clean up package... Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- Forwarded message -- From: SourceForge.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Aug 24, 2007 11:20 AM Subject: [ mumble-Bugs-1781152 ] Release Cleanup (debain/) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs item #1781152, was opened at 2007-08-24 15:20 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=768005aid=1781152group_id=147372 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Mumble Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Justin M. Wray (Ubuntu) (wrayubuntu) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Release Cleanup (debain/) Initial Comment: Hello, I am attempting to package Mumble for inclusion in the upcoming Ubuntu release (Gutsy Gibbon -- out sometime in October). However, Ubuntu (and Debian which would also benefit from this packaging) follow strict packaging rules, one of which being the debian/ directory cannot be found in the upstream tarball. i am posting this bug in hopes that a new tarball can be released which does not contain the debain/ directory. I look forward to working with you further to help supply this application to the Ubuntu and Debian based communities. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=768005aid=1781152group_id=147372 -- [needs-packaging] Mumble https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131973] Re: desktop random freezes in feisty
Okay, go ahead and give this till mid next week, if you are still not having a problem, I'll close the ticket. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- desktop random freezes in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132954] Re: APT errors after failed bcm43xx-fwcutter install
q8fft, after running the apt-get remove command, are you still having an issue? Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: bcm43xx-fwcutter (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- APT errors after failed bcm43xx-fwcutter install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131973] Re: desktop random freezes in feisty
** Changed in: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = In Progress -- desktop random freezes in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134310] Re: GeForce2 Go + Nvidia driver causing system freezes
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please include the information requested at [WWW] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DebuggingXAutoconfiguration as separate attachments. As well as try some of the troubleshooting steps. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Incomplete -- GeForce2 Go + Nvidia driver causing system freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134310 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134303] Re: sudo fails to authenticate user with pam_ldap based group
Nathanael: Have you taken a look at the sudo-ldap package? (http://packages.ubuntu.com/feisty/admin/sudo-ldap) This is found in the universe repository, so make sure you have that enabled. Package: sudo-ldap Description: Sudo is a program designed to allow a sysadmin to give limited root privileges to users and log root activity. The basic philosophy is to give as few privileges as possible but still allow people to get their work done. This version is built with LDAP support. Repository: Universe Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- sudo fails to authenticate user with pam_ldap based group https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134303 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134316] Re: Mozilla-thunderbird crashes when clicking on Account Settings
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please try to obtain a backtrace following the instructions at [WWW] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash and upload the backtrace (as an attachment) to the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: mozilla-thunderbird (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Incomplete -- Mozilla-thunderbird crashes when clicking on Account Settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134351] Re: Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423)
** Summary changed: - Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu + Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423) ** Tags added: laptop sound ** Attachment added: dpkg -l | grep -i alsa http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8957123/dpkg_alsa.txt -- Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134351] Re: Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423)
** Attachment added: lsmod http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8957125/lsmod.txt -- Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134351] Re: Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423)
** Attachment added: aplay -l http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8957126/aplay.txt -- Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134351] Re: Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423)
** Attachment added: dmesg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8957127/dmesg.txt -- Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134351] Re: Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423)
** Attachment added: asoundconf list http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8957129/asoundconf.txt -- Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134351] Re: Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423)
** Attachment added: lspci -nv http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8957132/lspci.txt -- Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134351] Re: Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423)
** Attachment added: amixer http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8957160/amixer.txt -- Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134351] Re: Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423)
** Attachment added: cat /proc/interrupts http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8957162/proc_interrupts.txt -- Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134351] Re: Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423)
** Attachment added: tail -2 /proc/asound/oss/sndstat http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8957173/asound_sndstat.txt -- Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134351] Re: Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423)
** Attachment added: sudo lspci -v http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8957185/sudo_lspci.txt ** Description changed: Dual boot Gateway MT3423 Windows Vista/Ubuntu Sound works fine in Vista. Sound does not work in Ubuntu Fiesty Used live cd of Mandriva, Fedora 7, Backtrack all have no sound. Ran the following fixes as provided at the following links: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DebuggingSoundProblems https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SoundTroubleshooting http://linux.iuplog.com/default.asp?item=94639 https://help.ubuntu.com/community/HdaIntelSoundHowto Nothing is muted. Alsa is up to date. Sound Download info from Gateway: D20007-003-001.exe - Windows Vista (32-bit/64-bit) Sigmatel Audio Driver version: 6.10.5337.0 Supports: Windows Vista (64-bit), Windows Vista (32-bit) The following information is listed below: dmesg cat /etc/asound.conf ~/.asoundrc* asoundconf list lspci -nv amixer cat /proc/interrupts tail -2 /proc/asound/oss/sndstat - $ lspci -v - $ lspnp -v - $ aplay --list-devices aplay: + lspci -v + lspnp -v + aplay --list-devices lsmod - modprobe snd-hda-intel dpkg -l | grep -i alsa dpkg -l | grep -i mixer - - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l | grep -i alsa - ii alsa-base 1.0.13-3ubuntu1 ALSA driver configuration files - ii alsa-tools-gui 1.0.13-1 GUI based ALSA utilities for specific hardwa - ii alsa-utils 1.0.13-1ubuntu5 ALSA utilities - ii gnome-alsamixer0.9.7~cvs.20060916-1 ALSA sound mixer for GNOME - ii gstreamer0.10-alsa 0.10.12-0ubuntu1 GStreamer plugin for ALSA - ii libasound2 1.0.13-1ubuntu5 ALSA library - ii libesd-alsa0 0.2.36-3ubuntu4 Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - Shared lib - ii libpt-plugins-alsa 1.10.3-0ubuntu1 Portable Windows Library Audio Plugin for th - ii libsdl1.2debian-alsa 1.2.11-7ubuntu1 Simple DirectMedia Layer (with X11 and ALSA - ii linux-sound-base 1.0.13-3ubuntu1 base package for ALSA and OSS sound systems - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l | grep -i mixer - ii gnome-alsamixer0.9.7~cvs.20060916-1 ALSA sound mixer for GNOME - ii libsdl-mixer1.21.2.6-1.1build1 mixer library for Simple DirectMedia Layer 1 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ - - - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsmod - Module Size Used by - binfmt_misc12680 1 - rfcomm 40856 0 - l2cap 25856 5 rfcomm - bluetooth 55908 4 rfcomm,l2cap - ipv6 268960 12 - ppdev 10116 0 - powernow_k816064 1 - cpufreq_powersave 2688 0 - cpufreq_conservative 8200 0 - cpufreq_ondemand9228 1 - cpufreq_stats 7360 0 - freq_table 5792 3 powernow_k8,cpufreq_ondemand,cpufreq_stats - cpufreq_userspace 5408 0 - tc1100_wmi 8068 0 - sony_acpi 6284 0 - pcc_acpi 13184 0 - dev_acpi 12292 0 - sbs15652 0 - button 8720 0 - ac 6020 0 - asus_acpi 17308 0 - i2c_ec 6016 1 sbs - container 5248 0 - video 16388 0 - battery10756 0 - backlight 7040 1 asus_acpi - dock 10268 0 - ndiswrapper 194608 0 - parport_pc 36388 0 - lp 12452 0 - parport36936 3 ppdev,parport_pc,lp - fuse 46612 0 - af_packet 23816 4 - joydev 10816 0 - snd_hda_intel 21912 1 - snd_hda_codec 205056 1 snd_hda_intel - snd_pcm_oss44544 0 - snd_mixer_oss 17408 1
[Bug 134351] Re: Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423)
I have altered the description of the bug for easier viewing, as such all command outputs have been attached to the bug as an attachment. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Also affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Laptop Team Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Justin M. Wray = (unassigned) -- Sigmatel STAC9200 No Sound/Audio Ubuntu (Gateway MT3423) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134316] Re: Mozilla-thunderbird crashes when clicking on Account Settings
** Changed in: mozilla-thunderbird (Ubuntu) Assignee: Justin M. Wray = (unassigned) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Mozilla-thunderbird crashes when clicking on Account Settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
Kristian: I already have a patch to correct the permission errors, so I can easily apply that to the Rev:5080 build. However, after looking through the linda/lintian output, the Ruby paths are not corrected either. I do not think the changes have been released upstream. We should speak to the upstream developers again. As soon as we have a clean build I'll put this up for testing, and then submission, as long as there are no issues. We have eight more days, if by the 24th, the changes are not applied upstream, I'll submit the package as is, and see what we can do. Hopefully worst case scenario we just upload a fix down the road. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133077] Re: OpenOffice.org doesn't works
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- OpenOffice.org doesn't works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133077 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133827] Re: apt-get tells me package 'vim' contains gvim, but does it?
The package seems to be 'vim-gnome' (http://packages.ubuntu.com/feisty/editors/vim-gnome) Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Confirmed -- apt-get tells me package 'vim' contains gvim, but does it? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133827 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
Pulled the latest snapshot from (Rev:5080), however all of the permission issues are still present. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
The metasploit developers have made the requested changes to the current SVN update. I'll be packaging tonight, and will place the package online for testing etc. Let me know if you are interested in testing. I also wanted to take a moment to thank the metasploit team for working with us, to get this packaged and added to Ubuntu. And I also want to thank Kristian for taking the time out of his own schedule to communicate with the metasploit team. Thanks everyone. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131973] Re: desktop random freezes in feisty
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you? Thanks in advance. The issue that you reported is one that should be reproducible with the live environment of the Desktop CD of the development release - Gutsy Gibbon. It would help us greatly if you could test with it so we can work on getting it fixed in the actively developed release. You can find out more about the development release at [WWW] http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/ Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- desktop random freezes in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133077] Re: OpenOffice.org doesn't works
Please try to obtain a backtrace following the instructions at [WWW] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash and upload the backtrace (as an attachment) to the bug report. Please also try to obtain a valgrind log following the instructions at [WWW] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Valgrind and attach the file to the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem. And if possible, Please also try to obtain a strace log, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Strace. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- OpenOffice.org doesn't works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133077 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131973] Re: desktop random freezes in feisty
** Changed in: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: beryl-core = meta-gnome2 -- desktop random freezes in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
Okay, so in general, I would agree that an application that doesn,t normall have a web feature, should seperated. I would also apply this rule to a GUI interface. But where do we draw the line? Just because MSF2 didn't have a GUI or a webinterface, doesn't mean that people using version 3 won't want it. Then again, are really the ones who should make that decision? I do not believe so. But do we really want a metaspolit-core, metasploit-gui, and metasploit- web. I do see a benifit, as dependencies would be diffrent etc. And I for one rearly use the web interface, and the GUI is far from mature. But then enters the legality issue. Can we really split the package up? That would require upstream approval, or for them to alter the way they distribute the package, and I see no benifit for them to do either. Do you? Last but I am sure not least, updates. Metasploit is updated with SVN, which would replace the missing files, so the first time the user updates his metaspolit installation (core) he ends up with the same thing he would have gotten with -web and -gui. Where is the point in that? Of course we could modifiy the package further, and make it only update part of the package, based on what they install. But all of that would come far after Gutst, and be more likely after Metasploit LLC releases a license change, which is in the works. So, I do agree, that split packages could be benifitial, however, I do not this that should be the focus of this release. Instead, I think a solid package from SVN with all compoents is in order. Thanks, Justin M. Wray Sent via BlackBerry by ATT -Original Message- From: Kristian Hermansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:57:22 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 On 8/20/07, Alessandro Tanasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I consider to deploy a separate package with web interface, in my packages. So, if we can't modify the package, does that mean that you want the same package in repositories twice, one with the web interface dependencies, and on without? I think the web interface is a huge part of msf3, especially for people who will be using it on Ubuntu. If we left that out, it would be a major detriment. Otherwise, we would need th same package in the repos twice (metasploit3 and metasploit3-web)... Are you a kind of pedantic guy? svn stay for nickname of subversion ;) I just wanted to make sure the package name was termed correctly. If you make the package RECOMMEND 'svn' apt will not resolve this package, as it is not valid. svn is the command name and not the package name. Yes, pedantics are my specialty :-p -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
I never noticed that msf2 had a GUI, then again I am much more of a CLI guy. Anyhow, I agree, we will add all depends, submit to Gutsy, and deal with the ideal situations down the road when they are possible. Thanks, Justin M. Wray Sent via BlackBerry by ATT -Original Message- From: Kristian Hermansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:38:54 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 On 8/20/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, so in general, I would agree that an application that doesn,t normall have a web feature, should seperated. I would also apply this rule to a GUI interface. But where do we draw the line? Yes, I also agree that under ideal circumstances this would be the case. However, we are working with a restrictive license so this become a larger issue. Suggest deferring until license is changed... Just because MSF2 didn't have a GUI or a webinterface, doesn't mean that people using version 3 won't want it. Then again, are really the ones who should make that decision? I do not believe so. msf2 did has a GUI as well :-) It just wasn't as easy to use as it is today. I use both the cli and gui, depending on how lazy I am and if I am screening the session, etc. Sometimes for n00bs, a GUI helps them learn enough that they can feel comfortable with the cli at a later point... But do we really want a metaspolit-core, metasploit-gui, and metasploit- web. I do see a benifit, as dependencies would be diffrent etc. And I for one rearly use the web interface, and the GUI is far from mature. But then enters the legality issue. Can we really split the package up? That would require upstream approval, or for them to alter the way they distribute the package, and I see no benifit for them to do either. Do you? Yes, there is a benefit, but not at the cost of delaying the package inclusion and/or dealing with license issues... Last but I am sure not least, updates. Metasploit is updated with SVN, which would replace the missing files, so the first time the user updates his metaspolit installation (core) he ends up with the same thing he would have gotten with -web and -gui. Where is the point in that? This is the best point to have been made. It makes no sense to break it up if you will pull the files right back in :-) Of course we could modifiy the package further, and make it only update part of the package, based on what they install. But all of that would come far after Gutst, and be more likely after Metasploit LLC releases a license change, which is in the works. So, I do agree, that split packages could be benifitial, however, I do not this that should be the focus of this release. Instead, I think a solid package from SVN with all compoents is in order. Agreed, so please include the dependencies for the web interface as well as I have listed. This will be great. 10 days left to cut off :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
Kristian, I know you have been attempting to speak with the MSF Dev's. Any chance they will apply the patches upstream? Alessandro is right, it would make things a lot easier, because then we would have no need to edit the source. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133000] Re: Desktop Effects doesn't react to CompizConfig Settings Manager
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Assignee: Justin M. Wray = (unassigned) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Desktop Effects doesn't react to CompizConfig Settings Manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133000 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133077] Re: OpenOffice.org doesn't works
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it, because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read How to report bugs effectively [WWW] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems. [WWW] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures At a minimum, we need: 1. the specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem, 2. the behavior you expected, and 3. the behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Incomplete -- OpenOffice.org doesn't works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133077 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133120] Re: sync pyopengl (3.0.0~a6-4) from unstable
** Summary changed: - sync request + sync pyopengl (3.0.0~a6-4) from unstable -- sync pyopengl (3.0.0~a6-4) from unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133124] Re: firefox does Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems. [WWW] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures Please also attempt obtain a valgrind log following the instructions at [WWW] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Valgrind and attach the file to the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem. In addition could you please try to obtain a backtrace by following the instructions on [WWW] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs, or upload (as an attachment) the crash report from /var/crash/. Also, please answer these questions: Is this crash reproducible? If so, which are the steps that lead to it? Which flash package do you have installed? Which Java package do you have installed? Which firefox extensions do you have installed? This will greatly aid us in tracking down your problem. ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Incomplete -- firefox does Segmentation fault (core dumped) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133124 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133123] Re: Squid3 segfaults with missing error_directory
Thank you for the Bug report. What version of squid do you have installed? Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: squid3 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Squid3 segfaults with missing error_directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133123 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133133] Re: Open containing folder not working in Kubuntu
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Open containing folder not working in Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133133 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133110] Re: Merge with Debian
** Changed in: ndiswrapper (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Merge with Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133110 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133132] Re: [GUTSY] Crash after partition formated
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [GUTSY] Crash after partition formated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133108] Re: forsight
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it, because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read How to report bugs effectively [WWW] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems. [WWW] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures At a minimum, we need: 1. the specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem, 2. the behavior you expected, and 3. the behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Incomplete ** Summary changed: - forsight + hal (gutsy) -- hal (gutsy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133108 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133118] Re: very corrupt X after suspend/resume
What version of Compiz are you running, and from what repository? Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- very corrupt X after suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133115] Re: every 21st boot my system gets checked
Thank you for your suggestion. However, the changes you are requesting aren't really a bug and require more discussion, which should be done on an appropriate mailing list or forum. [WWW] http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community/mailinglists might be a good start for determining which mailing list to use. Even if you do not agree with this feature, it is a feature, and is the default. Therefore, this bug has been marked as invalid. Feel free to discuss your views further on the mailing lists, as they are welcome. But let me add this as well, just to help you understand what is going on... Do you have any statistics of desktop computers that prove that this is required or was this feature chosen because someone just found it useful? From wikipedia - A journaling file system is designed such that tools such as fsck do not need to be run as often. Notice it doesn't say at all. This is a proactive step to avoid possible issues, and most users would much rather run that, and not have an issue, then run into a larger problem down the road. Also, it is fairly easy to alter the settings. If in your case the scan takes too long, you have the ability to change the settings. But for myself (on many many computers) and for others I know, the scan takes but a minute or so. Also, you can't tell every user to go to the console to turn this annoying feature off. People coming from Windows will find this annoying and it definitely doesn't make Linux more user-friendly to them. It is far better then trying to explain to them how to manually run 'fsck' from a LiveCD, etc. Seriously, this can't be called a feature. I've never seen any other operating system do this. Why does Windows not need this? Why does Ubuntu need this? Doesn't Ubuntu have a journalling file system? Then, why should this check be done, at all? Windows absolutely runs a check as well as OSX. Remember back in the day, pre-XP, you would boot to the annoying ScanDisk. Or even with XP, with the lovely blue disk checking screen (and no that doesn't ONLY run due to a bad shutdown). The Windows scan takes forever... Hope this better relays the methodology behind 'fsck', It is far better to run an auto-check, then wait and have a problem. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- every 21st boot my system gets checked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133142] Re: CD and DVD drives don't work on Feisty 7.04
** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: New = Confirmed -- CD and DVD drives don't work on Feisty 7.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133120] Re: sync pyopengl (3.0.0~a6-4) from unstable
** Changed in: pyopengl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- sync pyopengl (3.0.0~a6-4) from unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132965] Re: Thunderbird message filter only reads first line of message header value
** Changed in: mozilla-thunderbird (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Thunderbird message filter only reads first line of message header value https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133118] Re: very corrupt X after suspend/resume
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- very corrupt X after suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132947] Re: mail-notification lost its ssl/tls ability
** Changed in: mail-notification (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- mail-notification lost its ssl/tls ability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133153] Re: [needs-packaging] conduit
** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: New = Confirmed -- [needs-packaging] conduit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
I think he might have been weary of using my script on the source blindly... Agreed, plus the original script removed SVN, which is used to update MSF, so he would not have done that anyway. I'll send him an email and see if we can get the Ruby paths updated, as well as the permissions corrected. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
Okay, well, we should be good to go, I was able to integrate the needed permission changes into the build. The Ruby patch applies as well. Any other needed changes? I'll post linda/lintian without SVN errors, so we can review. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
Welcome back Alessandro, I noticed you did package MSF as well, so I hope that I haven't stepped on your toes. I have been reviewing the licenes as well. Have a look at: http ://framework-mirrors.metasploit.com/documents/RELEASE-3.0.txt The part that stands out - * Metasploit is now released under the Metasploit Framework License. This license allows anyone to use the framework for almost anything, but prevents commercial abuse and outright code theft. The Metasploit Framework License helps keep the platform stable and still allows module developers to choose their own licensing terms for their code (commercial or open source). For more information, please see the license document included in the distribution. It is clear that Metasploit LLC is attempting to protect the work from being used to re-create a metasploit clone and more importantly be altered and sold. But I do not really think the idea is to keep anyone from packaging the application, as long as the license stays intact and the core code isn't altered. We are not changing any code or functions in anyway. Only correcting the Ruby path (thats the patch that is mentioned). I would honestly like clarification from the Metasploit developer's as to what is legal and not. Now lets just say the end result is the code cannot be altered in any way, including our patches to the Ruby path, and file permissions. How will Debian (or Ubuntu) handle the resulting package? Obviously it will build, and work, but will have a hefty linda/lintian output, and break a few policies. Then again this is going to multivers anyway... From: http://www.ubuntu.com/community/ubuntustory/components multiverse component The multiverse component contains software that is not free, which means the licensing requirements of this software do not meet the Ubuntu main Component Licence Policy. The onus is on you to verify your rights to use this software and comply with the licensing terms of the copyright holder. This software is not supported and usually cannot be fixed or updated. Use it at your own risk. So it is clear that Ubuntu is far more lenient with multiverse packages. The package still functions without the Ruby patch or the permission correction. It would just be a rather bad package. The best chance we have is to make the minor changes to the source from the patches mentioned. This will also give us the best package possible. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
** Attachment added: The Metasploit Framework License v1.2 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8853728/LICENSE -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
Let's break down the License, and see where we fall. ... Definitions ... c. Enhancement means any bug fix, error correction, patch, or other addition to the Software that are independent of the Software and do not require modification of the Software of the Software itself. ... 3. The license granted in Section 2 is expressly made subject to and limited by the following restrictions: a. You may only distribute, publicly display, and publicly perform unmodified Software. Without limiting the foregoing, You agree to maintain (and not supplement, remove, or modify) the same copyright, trademark notices and disclaimers in the exact wording as released by Developer. ... 4. You may develop Enhancements to the Software and distribute Your Enhancements, provided that You agree to each of the following restrictions on this distribution: a. Enhancements may not modify, supplement, or obscure the user interface or output of the Software such that the title of the Software, the copyrights and trademark notices in the Software, or the licensing terms of the Software are removed, hidden, or made less likely to be discovered or read. b. If you release any Enhancement to the Software, You agree to distribute the Enhancement under the terms of this License (or any other later-issued license(s) of Developer for the Software). Upon such release, You hereby grant and agree to grant a non-exclusive royalty-free right, to both (i) Developer and (ii) any of Developer's later licensees, owners, contributors, agents or business partners, to distribute Your Enhancement(s) with future versions of the Software provided that such versions remain available under the terms of this License (or any other later-adopted license(s) of Developer). ... Online Updates The Software includes the ability to download updates (i.e., additional code) from Developer's server(s). These updates may contain bug fixes, new functionality, updated Documentation, and/or Extensions. When retrieving these updates, the Software may transmit the Software version and operating system information from Your computer to the update server. The server may record (store) this information, in conjunction with the IP (global Internet Protocol) address of the user, in order to attempt to maintain accurate end user and version statistics. By using the online update feature, You hereby agree to allow this information to be transmitted, recorded, and stored in any nation by or for Developer. I pulled out only the parts that are important to the matter at hand. An unedited version of the license can be found, attached above or from the metasploit website. I have not modified any content of the license and have only copiedpasted the parted needed for discussion. - 1) Definitions, entry c - Indicates that bug fixes are considered an Enhancement (this includes patches). 2) Section 3 - a indicates that only unmodified versions of the software can be distributed. 3) Section 4 grants the right to create Enhancements (or patches) 4) Section 4 - a enforces that the patches do not alter, the user-interface, license, or output etc. 5) Section 4 - b states we must release the patch under the same license (The Metasploit Framework License v1.2) 6) Online Updates Section notes that some user information may be recorded I am no lawyer by here is my feedback on the above statements: 1 - The Ruby patch, and permissions correction would fall under an Enhancement 2 - This would indicate that we cannot distribute the code, however when you get right down to it, Debian policies do not allow this anyway, and we instead patch the unmodified source. Either way this state makes it seem as if no modifications are allowed. 3 - However, this section gives the right to patch the code. Therefore distributing the unmodified source, and the patches should be fine. 4 - Our patches are only bug fixes, and in no way alter any of these items 5 - Ubuntu packages are released as GPL, we could in theory release the patch under The Metasploit Framework License v1.2, but currently it is included in the package, with no restrictions. This is something we should look into. 6 - I really think this should be relayed to the client, as some would want to know this up front. - Maybe I am reading into this the wrong way, I am not sure, any comments? Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132979] Re: Please consider installing canoe by default
Thank you for your suggestion. However, the changes you are requesting aren't really a bug and require more discussion, which should be done on an appropriate mailing list or forum. [WWW] http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community/mailinglists might be a good start for determining which mailing list to use. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Summary changed: - Please consider making ubuntu-desktop recommend canoe + Please consider installing canoe by default ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Please consider installing canoe by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132979 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132954] Re: after any install got error masg
As per Bug 127624 this package is broken, due to an upstream hosting issue. As such, it will not fully install, and fails during the installation. Simply run the following to remove the package, and it will no longer error out. `apt-ger remove bcm43xx-fwcutter` Let me know if this works. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: bcm43xx-fwcutter (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- APT errors after failed bcm43xx-fwcutter install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132954] Re: after any install got error masg
That should be: `apt-get remove bcm43xx-fwcutter` Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = In Progress ** Summary changed: - after any install got error masg + APT errors after failed bcm43xx-fwcutter install -- APT errors after failed bcm43xx-fwcutter install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132339] Re: attempted to install Broadcom wireless drivers and it failed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 127624 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127624 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 127624 and is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any information missing that you can add or to see if there is a work around. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 127624 bcm43xx-fwcutter does not download and install firmware, may need to be updated. ** Changed in: bcm43xx-fwcutter (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- attempted to install Broadcom wireless drivers and it failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132493] Re: package bcm43xx-fwcutter 1:006-1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-installation script ha restituito un codice di errore 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 127624 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127624 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 127624 and is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any information missing that you can add or to see if there is a work around. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 127624 bcm43xx-fwcutter does not download and install firmware, may need to be updated. ** Changed in: bcm43xx-fwcutter (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- package bcm43xx-fwcutter 1:006-1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-installation script ha restituito un codice di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131028] Re: bcm43xx-fwcutter firmware download source is a 404 Error Page
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 127624 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127624 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 127624 and is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any information missing that you can add or to see if there is a work around. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 127624 bcm43xx-fwcutter does not download and install firmware, may need to be updated. ** Changed in: bcm43xx-fwcutter (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- bcm43xx-fwcutter firmware download source is a 404 Error Page https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131028 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132954] Re: after any install got error masg
** Changed in: bcm43xx-fwcutter (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Confirmed -- after any install got error masg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 127624] Re: bcm43xx-fwcutter does not download and install firmware, may need to be updated.
** Changed in: bcm43xx-fwcutter (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Confirmed -- bcm43xx-fwcutter does not download and install firmware, may need to be updated. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 130824] Re: AMD Turion 64 mobile duo core. freezes during install get errors associated with the file bcm4xx_microcore5.fw
Current blocking bug 127624 for bcm43xx-fwcutter Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- AMD Turion 64 mobile duo core. freezes during install get errors associated with the file bcm4xx_microcore5.fw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 127624] Re: [bcm43xx-fwcutter] Failed Download - 404
** Summary changed: - bcm43xx-fwcutter does not download and install firmware, may need to be updated. + [bcm43xx-fwcutter] Failed Download - 404 -- [bcm43xx-fwcutter] Failed Download - 404 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132996] Re: Notification popups are annoying and should be optional
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #455250 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455250 ** Also affects: network-manager (upstream) via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455250 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Notification popups are annoying and should be optional https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 130380] Re: Unable to view Flash Content (firefox)
wordofglass: You installed flash via nspluginwrapper, correct? I would open a new bug under that package, and document your bug there. While posting this new bug, take a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- Unable to view Flash Content (firefox) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133000] Re: Desktop Effects doesn't react to CompizConfig Settings Manager
What version of Compiz and CompizConfig are you running, and from which repository? Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Incomplete -- Desktop Effects doesn't react to CompizConfig Settings Manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133000 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132976] Re: Flash applet can not access webcam
Thank you for the bug report. Could you please try to obtain a backtrace by following the instructions on [WWW] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs, or upload (as an attachment) the crash report from /var/crash/. Also, please answer these questions: Is this crash reproducible? If so, which are the steps that lead to it? Which flash package do you have installed? Which Java package do you have installed? Which firefox extensions do you have installed? This will greatly aid us in tracking down your problem. Thanks, Justin M. Wray ** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray Status: New = Invalid ** Also affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete ** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Assignee: Justin M. Wray = (unassigned) ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Justin M. Wray -- Flash applet can not access webcam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132856] Re: Build with GNOME support
** Tags added: needs-packaging -- Build with GNOME support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132856 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
