[Bug 1013012] Re: regression with sendmail and Android clients
No current issues with modern android and modern ubuntu ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013012 Title: regression with sendmail and Android clients To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1013012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1972043] Re: Please add -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero to default build flags
Adding it to the compiler means *all* builds benefit, which is the reason this was done on the other options. People build their local projects, newer versions of tools from GitHub, etc etc. This needs to be in the compiler directly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972043 Title: Please add -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero to default build flags To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1972043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1972043] Re: Please add -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero to default build flags
Yes, -Wuninitialized continues to warn, even if they were auto- initialized. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972043 Title: Please add -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero to default build flags To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-12/+bug/1972043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1972043] [NEW] Please add -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero to default build flags
Public bug reported: Please add "-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero" for GCC 12 (which is the first release of GCC to provide this flag). It goes well with the other important security flaw mitigation flags already enabled in Ubuntu for GCC: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/CompilerFlags While many variables are initialized (due to -Wuninitialized), there is a blind spot for variables passed by reference, padding, and cases where -Wuninitialized just fails to track it. Universally wiping the variables eliminates nearly the entire class of uninitialized stack variable use (https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/457.html) with nearly no overhead (e.g. any duplicate assignments will already be squashed during dead store elimination, etc). ** Affects: gcc-12 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972043 Title: Please add -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero to default build flags To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-12/+bug/1972043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1814012] Re: netplan type wifis needs a device option
See https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/240 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814012 Title: netplan type wifis needs a device option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1814012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1814012] Re: netplan type wifis needs a device option
For example, fallback (-Dnl80211,wext) is used for the wpa_supplicant systemd service: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wpa/-/blob/debian/unstable/debian/patches/networkd- driver-fallback.patch But it isn't present in the netplan networkd renderer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814012 Title: netplan type wifis needs a device option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1814012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1814012] Re: netplan type wifis needs a device option
> What is the range of possible values for this -D option, and why would
you ever want to specify it in the netplan yaml instead of inferring it?
It would be best if wpa_supplicant selected the correct driver, but it
seems it doesn't do a good job with this. It does support fallbacks,
though, which seems like a reasonable default behavior for
wpa_supplicant ("-Dnl80211,wext"), but sometimes different drivers have
different behaviors/abilities, so explicitly choosing one is useful.
I see two issues:
- wpa_supplicant makes no attempt to automatically pick a working driver
- netplan doesn't have a way to choose a driver if wpa_supplicant's default
(nl80211) doesn't work
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814012
Title:
netplan type wifis needs a device option
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1814012/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943049] Re: Docker ubuntu:impish: Problem executing scripts DPkg::Post-Invoke 'rm -f /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/partial/*.deb /var/cache/apt/*.bin || true'
Host dockers need this: https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/42681 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943049 Title: Docker ubuntu:impish: Problem executing scripts DPkg::Post-Invoke 'rm -f /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/partial/*.deb /var/cache/apt/*.bin || true' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1943049/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943049] Re: Docker ubuntu:impish: Problem executing scripts DPkg::Post-Invoke 'rm -f /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/partial/*.deb /var/cache/apt/*.bin || true'
I hit this too. Host is hirsute. It went so far as blowing up docker itself, with: runtime/cgo: pthread_create failed: Operation not permitted -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943049 Title: Docker ubuntu:impish: Problem executing scripts DPkg::Post-Invoke 'rm -f /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/partial/*.deb /var/cache/apt/*.bin || true' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1943049/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892145] Re: [SRU] smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
Sorry for not responding sooner. I'm away from that system where I first experienced the problem. I'll be able to test it not sooner than early September. Besides that, I have a setup (with LXC containers). Unfortunately I can't reproduce the initial problem in this setup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892145 Title: [SRU] smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/1892145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1360912] Re: ScanTool included on the repos does not connect
Version 2.1 works with clones and presents a correct list of ports. Please open a new bug if problems persist. :) ** Changed in: scantool (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360912 Title: ScanTool included on the repos does not connect To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scantool/+bug/1360912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904990] Re: Missing i386 version of libnss-sss
What's the progress on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904990 Title: Missing i386 version of libnss-sss To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1904990/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1928385] Re: The systemd process runs twice, somehow preventing the system from getting to proper GUI login screen. I kill the higher number PID from a getty, and then my system boots properl
No, this bug was submitted from the GUI. By that point, I'd already killed the second systemd. You could say I have a chicken and egg problem. On Mon, May 17, 2021, 14:30 Dan Streetman <1928...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I don't see anywhere in your dmesg where systemd is 'running twice', you > probably should attach your boot/journal logs that show the problem. > > ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Incomplete > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928385 > > Title: > The systemd process runs twice, somehow preventing the system from > getting to proper GUI login screen. I kill the higher number PID from > a getty, and then my system boots properly. > > Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: > Incomplete > > Bug description: > The summary says all. The systemd process runs twice, somehow > preventing the system from getting to proper GUI login screen. My > screen stays dark, I jump to a getty using Alt-F2. I log in on the > terminal, take a list of running processes, I kill the higher number > PID from a getty, and then my system boots properly. > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 > Package: systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.6 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-53.60~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18 > Uname: Linux 5.8.0-53-generic x86_64 > ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16 > Architecture: amd64 > CasperMD5CheckResult: skip > CurrentDesktop: XFCE > Date: Thu May 13 22:13:54 2021 > InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-15 (118 days ago) > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 > (20200731) > Lsusb: >Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub >Bus 001 Device 003: ID 046d:c30e Logitech, Inc. UltraX Keyboard (Y-BL49) >Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c077 Logitech, Inc. M105 Optical Mouse >Bus 001 Device 004: ID 05e3:0608 Genesys Logic, Inc. Hub >Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub > MachineType: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M. > ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-53-generic > root=UUID=854a0e43-544b-49d8-818f-d285989bdbc1 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 > SourcePackage: systemd > SystemdDelta: >[MASKED] /etc/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service → > /usr/lib/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service >[EXTENDED] /usr/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service → > /usr/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service.d/debian.conf >[EXTENDED] /usr/lib/systemd/system/user@.service → > /usr/lib/systemd/system/user@.service.d/timeout.conf > >3 overridden configuration files found. > UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) > dmi.bios.date: 03/16/2016 > dmi.bios.release: 5.6 > dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. > dmi.bios.version: F4 > dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M. > dmi.board.name: H110M-S2H-CF > dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. > dmi.board.version: x.x > dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. > dmi.chassis.type: 3 > dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. > dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. > dmi.modalias: > dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrF4:bd03/16/2016:br5.6:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:pvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnH110M-S2H-CF:rvrx.x:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.: > dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M. > dmi.product.name: To be filled by O.E.M. > dmi.product.sku: To be filled by O.E.M. > dmi.product.version: To be filled by O.E.M. > dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1928385/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928385 Title: The systemd process runs twice, somehow preventing the system from getting to proper GUI login screen. I kill the higher number PID from a getty, and then my system boots properly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1928385/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1928385] [NEW] The systemd process runs twice, somehow preventing the system from getting to proper GUI login screen. I kill the higher number PID from a getty, and then my system boots properly.
Public bug reported: The summary says all. The systemd process runs twice, somehow preventing the system from getting to proper GUI login screen. My screen stays dark, I jump to a getty using Alt-F2. I log in on the terminal, take a list of running processes, I kill the higher number PID from a getty, and then my system boots properly. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-53.60~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18 Uname: Linux 5.8.0-53-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: XFCE Date: Thu May 13 22:13:54 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-15 (118 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731) Lsusb: Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 003: ID 046d:c30e Logitech, Inc. UltraX Keyboard (Y-BL49) Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c077 Logitech, Inc. M105 Optical Mouse Bus 001 Device 004: ID 05e3:0608 Genesys Logic, Inc. Hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub MachineType: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M. ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-53-generic root=UUID=854a0e43-544b-49d8-818f-d285989bdbc1 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: systemd SystemdDelta: [MASKED] /etc/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service → /usr/lib/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service [EXTENDED] /usr/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service → /usr/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service.d/debian.conf [EXTENDED] /usr/lib/systemd/system/user@.service → /usr/lib/systemd/system/user@.service.d/timeout.conf 3 overridden configuration files found. UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 03/16/2016 dmi.bios.release: 5.6 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: F4 dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.board.name: H110M-S2H-CF dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. dmi.board.version: x.x dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrF4:bd03/16/2016:br5.6:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:pvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnH110M-S2H-CF:rvrx.x:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.: dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.product.name: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.product.sku: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.product.version: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928385 Title: The systemd process runs twice, somehow preventing the system from getting to proper GUI login screen. I kill the higher number PID from a getty, and then my system boots properly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1928385/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1914685] Re: Please enable CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
This is a CONFIG request, do no apport collection required. :) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914685 Title: Please enable CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1914685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1914685] [NEW] Please enable CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
Public bug reported: Enabling CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS is fast and provides good coverage for out- of-bounds array indexing (i.e. it catchings the things that CONFIG_FORTIFY doesn't). ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914685 Title: Please enable CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1914685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892145] Re: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
In /etc/krb5.conf.d/freeipa there is
[libdefaults]
spake_preauth_groups = edwards25519
And in /var/lib/sss/pubconf/krb5.include.d there is the following
$ more /var/lib/sss/pubconf/krb5.include.d/*|cat
::
/var/lib/sss/pubconf/krb5.include.d/domain_realm_ghs_nl
::
[domain_realm]
::
/var/lib/sss/pubconf/krb5.include.d/krb5_libdefaults
::
[libdefaults]
canonicalize = true
::
/var/lib/sss/pubconf/krb5.include.d/localauth_plugin
::
[plugins]
localauth = {
module =
sssd:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sssd/modules/sssd_krb5_localauth_plugin.so
}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892145
Title:
smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1892145/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892145] Re: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
In /etc/krb5.conf.d/freeipa there is
[libdefaults]
spake_preauth_groups = edwards25519
And in /var/lib/sss/pubconf/krb5.include.d there is the following
$ more /var/lib/sss/pubconf/krb5.include.d/*|cat
::
/var/lib/sss/pubconf/krb5.include.d/domain_realm_ghs_nl
::
[domain_realm]
::
/var/lib/sss/pubconf/krb5.include.d/krb5_libdefaults
::
[libdefaults]
canonicalize = true
::
/var/lib/sss/pubconf/krb5.include.d/localauth_plugin
::
[plugins]
localauth = {
module =
sssd:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sssd/modules/sssd_krb5_localauth_plugin.so
}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892145
Title:
smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1892145/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1912043] Re: grub2 fails to install/probe into md device when drives have moved around
** Summary changed: - grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with first drive not active (i.e. hot spare) + grub2 fails to install/probe into md device when drives have moved around ** Description changed: grub2 appears to _sometimes_ ignore md devices with a hot spare: $ cat /proc/mdstat - Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] - md5 : active raid1 sda2[2](S) sdb2[3] sde2[4] - 2925939136 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] - bitmap: 2/22 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk + Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] + md5 : active raid1 sda2[0](S) sdb2[1] sde2[2] + 2925939136 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] + bitmap: 2/22 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk md6 : active raid1 sdf2[0] sdd2[2](S) sdk2[1] - 3902691136 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] - bitmap: 1/30 pages [4KB], 65536KB chunk + 3902691136 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] + bitmap: 1/30 pages [4KB], 65536KB chunk unused devices: $ sudo grub-probe -vvv / 2>&1 | grep -E 'info: Inserting md/|error' grub-probe: info: Inserting md/6 (+0,7805382272) into systemvg (lvm) grub-probe: error: disk `lvmid/5R9E1M-V0xL-pEsR-74zV-3oOm-JorM-hb2Erw/WHUtMx-lZcd-2RmH-WVSk-Z0Et-qiqS-hFBd4u' not found. If I remove the hotspare from md5, everything works normally and I can - install grub again. But md6 has a spare too... ?! + install grub again. + + And if devices have moved around enough internally that the internal + index doesn't match the max count any more, they also become invisible + to grub. For example: + + $ cat /proc/mdstat + Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] + md5 : active raid1 sdb2[3] sde2[4] + 2925939136 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] + bitmap: 2/22 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk + + Note the "[3]" and "[4]". Unlike mdadm, grub was not checking beyond the + array size. This needs fixing as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912043 Title: grub2 fails to install/probe into md device when drives have moved around To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1912043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1912043] Re: grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with first drive not active (i.e. hot spare)
Also need to fix the indexing. ** Patch added: "fix-md-array-enumeration.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1912043/+attachment/5453745/+files/fix-md-array-enumeration.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912043 Title: grub2 fails to install/probe into md device when drives have moved around To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1912043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1912043] Re: grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with first drive not active (i.e. hot spare)
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?59887 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912043 Title: grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with first drive not active (i.e. hot spare) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1912043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1912043] Re: grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with first drive not active (i.e. hot spare)
** Patch added: "fix-md-array-list-truncation.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1912043/+attachment/5453655/+files/fix-md-array-list-truncation.patch ** Bug watch added: GNU Savannah Bug Tracker #59887 http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59887 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912043 Title: grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with first drive not active (i.e. hot spare) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1912043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1912043] Re: grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with first drive not active (i.e. hot spare)
** Summary changed: - grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with hot spare + grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with first drive not active (i.e. hot spare) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912043 Title: grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with first drive not active (i.e. hot spare) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1912043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1912043] [NEW] grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with hot spare
Public bug reported: grub2 appears to _sometimes_ ignore md devices with a hot spare: $ cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md5 : active raid1 sda2[2](S) sdb2[3] sde2[4] 2925939136 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] bitmap: 2/22 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk md6 : active raid1 sdf2[0] sdd2[2](S) sdk2[1] 3902691136 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] bitmap: 1/30 pages [4KB], 65536KB chunk unused devices: $ sudo grub-probe -vvv / 2>&1 | grep -E 'info: Inserting md/|error' grub-probe: info: Inserting md/6 (+0,7805382272) into systemvg (lvm) grub-probe: error: disk `lvmid/5R9E1M-V0xL-pEsR-74zV-3oOm-JorM-hb2Erw/WHUtMx-lZcd-2RmH-WVSk-Z0Et-qiqS-hFBd4u' not found. If I remove the hotspare from md5, everything works normally and I can install grub again. But md6 has a spare too... ?! ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912043 Title: grub2 fails to install/probe into md device with hot spare To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1912043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1475337] Re: grub-probe can't probe large logical volumes (LVM)
This particular problem appears fixed is latest grub2, though I'm seeing a similar failure, which may need a new bug report. ** Also affects: grub2 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Bug watch added: GNU Savannah Bug Tracker #45562 http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?45562 ** Also affects: grub via http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?45562 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475337 Title: grub-probe can't probe large logical volumes (LVM) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/1475337/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1027363] Re: grub-install fails with "out of disk" error
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1475337 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475337 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1475337 grub-probe can't probe large logical volumes (LVM) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027363 Title: grub-install fails with "out of disk" error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1027363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904990] Re: Missing i386 version of libnss-sss
Hi Timo, Any news on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904990 Title: Missing i386 version of libnss-sss To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1904990/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821415] Re: pkexec fails in a non-graphical environment
Can we raise the importance please? It is quite essential to let unprivileged users run certain commands, even if there is not GUI. Also, it is very confusing when everything is configured correctly, plus the password is correct, and then to get the message "Not authorized", "This incident has been reported." -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821415 Title: pkexec fails in a non-graphical environment To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/policykit-1/+bug/1821415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1466150] Re: grub-install breaks when ESP is on raid
(This may have only been present on older firmware versions, though, as I no longer see the behavior on a newer T30.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466150 Title: grub-install breaks when ESP is on raid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1466150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1466150] Re: grub-install breaks when ESP is on raid
https://outflux.net/blog/archives/2018/04/19/uefi-booting-and-raid1/ The UEFI on the Dell T30 I was testing on would write a "boot variable cache" file to the ESP. :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466150 Title: grub-install breaks when ESP is on raid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1466150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1466150] Re: grub-install breaks when ESP is on raid
The only reference I could find was https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/UEFI-Variable- Runtime-Cache which hints at a "device storage" for variables... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466150 Title: grub-install breaks when ESP is on raid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1466150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1905975] Re: kernel: Enable CONFIG_BPF_LSM on Ubuntu
(This is a feature request, so no log needed.) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905975 Title: kernel: Enable CONFIG_BPF_LSM on Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1905975/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904990] Re: Missing i386 version of libnss-sss
What would it take to build the deb myself? I know how to build packages, but not how to build a i386 deb on my amd64 machine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904990 Title: Missing i386 version of libnss-sss To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1904990/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904990] Re: Missing i386 version of libnss-sss
Commercial tools such as the Green Hills compilers. Of course there are updates, but sometimes it is not possible, or allowed to upgrade due to safety restrictions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904990 Title: Missing i386 version of libnss-sss To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1904990/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904990] [NEW] Missing i386 version of libnss-sss
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 20.04 there is no i386 support of libnss-sss anymore. Now certain (older) programs don't work anymore in an environment with SSSD. I'd like to request to bring the i386 support back to life. ** Affects: sssd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904990 Title: Missing i386 version of libnss-sss To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1904990/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892526] Re: dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc no longer prompts for grub-pc/install_devices
I can confirm this fixes the issue on Bionic on amd64. Thanks for the SRU! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892526 Title: dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc no longer prompts for grub-pc/install_devices To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1892526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1846947] Re: No profiling support
ad 1,2) Ubuntu provides both Netdata and Samba. Unfortunately the integration between the two is missing and therefor Netdata is currently unable to monitor Samba resources. For Netdata to monitor Samba it runs 'smbstatus -P', however this option is only available when Samba is compiled with support for profiling and when the option 'smbd profiling level = on' is specified in smb.conf ad 3) This issue can indeed be solved by Debian, indeed the most logical way to go forward is to create an upstream issue. ad 4) From Samba 2.2.5 release notes (18th June 2002): With samba compiled for profile data collection, you may see a very slight degradation in performance even with profiling collection turned off. On initial tests with NetBench on an SGI Origin 200 server, this degradation was not measurable with profile collection off compared to no profile collection compiled into samba. With count profile collection enabled on all clients, the degradation was less than 2%. With full profile collection enabled on all clients, the degradation was about 8.5%. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846947 Title: No profiling support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1846947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892145] Re: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
The /etc/krb5.conf is installed and configured by FreeIPA. See attached
krb5.conf
Indeed it has
[libdefaults]
default_ccache_name = KEYRING:persistent:%{uid}
** Attachment added: "krb5.conf"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1892145/+attachment/5406950/+files/krb5.conf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892145
Title:
smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1892145/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892145] Re: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
Here is the core dump. ** Attachment added: "Core dump" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1892145/+attachment/5404296/+files/core -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892145 Title: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1892145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892145] Re: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
Well, it didn't actually create a core dump. It only said so. I'll see what I can do to actually create the dump. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892145 Title: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1892145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892145] Re: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
A workaround is to confuse smbclient by setting KRB5CCNAME to an unknown file KRB5CCNAME=FILE:/none-existing-file I just strumbled on a note from Alexander Bokovoy "... and Samba on Debian/Ubuntu is compiled with Heimdal Kerberos ... Heimdal has no support for KEYRING type" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892145 Title: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1892145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892145] Re: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
There is an option -k, to enable Kerberos. But there is no option to disable it. Smbclient decides on its own to use Kerberos, and it crashes (core dumped) while doing so. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892145 Title: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1892145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892145] [NEW] smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)
Public bug reported: It is not possible anymore to connect anonymously to a Samba server, if there is a Kerberos environment. It does not matter if there is a valid Kerberos ticket or not. I'm using FreeIPA. This is with smbclient 2:4.11.6+dfsg-0ubuntu1.4 For example, $ smbclient -L '//dist.ghs.nl/space' -N Failed to resolve credential cache 'KEYRING:persistent:60001'! (Unknown credential cache type) free(): double free detected in tcache 2 Aborted (core dumped) On Ubuntu 18.04, with smbclient 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.18 it works as expected (albeit with many messages about failing krb5_init_context and smb_krb5_context_init_basic) The combination Samba + FreeIPA + Ubuntu has never worked since I started using FreeIPA a few years ago. But anonymous access to a Samba server did work, until I switched to Ubuntu 20.04. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892145 Title: smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1892145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 386558]
commit a0f33f996f7986dbf37631a4577f8565b42df29e Author: Ulrich Drepper Date: Thu Sep 8 19:48:47 2011 -0400 Add range checking for FD_SET, FD_CLR, and FD_ISSET -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386558 Title: RLIMIT_NOFILE > FD_SETSIZE seems to cause select() to corrupt the stack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/386558/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1880250] [NEW] disk check progress no longer visible
Public bug reported: It seems the transition to bgrt lost something with Ubuntu's disk check details. The only thing I see on my screen during a long disk check is the "press Ctrl-C to stop all in progress disk checks" with no progress. ** Affects: plymouth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: champagne rls-ff-incoming rls-gg-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880250 Title: disk check progress no longer visible To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1880250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868105] Re: No Sound, dummy output in settings
I've upgraded my Dell G3-3590 to Ubuntu 20.04 which also fixes the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868105 Title: No Sound, dummy output in settings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-osp1/+bug/1868105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868105] Re: No Sound, dummy output in settings
I tried options snd-hda-intel index=0 model=laptop-dmic in /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf, but it did not work for me. I tried 5.0.0-1047-oem-osp1, but still not fixed. Then I tried kernel parameter snd_hda_intel.dmic_detect=0, which fixes the sound output, but the internal microphone now doesn't work, see also https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/64720. I've tried snd_hda_intel.dmic_detect=0 on 5.0.0-1040-oem, 1046 and 1047, and all produce sound output now (although the mic doesn't work, but plugging in a headset (with mic) gets me a mic and output, if needed). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868105 Title: No Sound, dummy output in settings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-osp1/+bug/1868105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868105] Re: No Sound, dummy output in settings
not fixed with 5.0.0-1046-oem-osp1, reverting back to 5.0.0-1040-oem- osp1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868105 Title: No Sound, dummy output in settings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-osp1/+bug/1868105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868105] Re: No Sound, dummy output in settings
Oops on 5.3.0.42: Mar 19 21:00:36 kees-G3-3590 kernel: [5.601338] skl_hda_dsp_generic skl_hda_dsp_generic: ASoC: source widget Alt Analog Codec Capture overwritten Mar 19 21:00:36 kees-G3-3590 kernel: [5.601347] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00010067 Mar 19 21:00:36 kees-G3-3590 kernel: [5.601350] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode Mar 19 21:00:36 kees-G3-3590 kernel: [5.601351] #PF: error_code(0x) - not-present page Mar 19 21:00:36 kees-G3-3590 kernel: [5.601352] PGD 0 P4D 0 Mar 19 21:00:36 kees-G3-3590 kernel: [5.601355] Oops: [#1] SMP PTI Mar 19 21:00:36 kees-G3-3590 kernel: [5.601358] CPU: 4 PID: 587 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: P OE 5.3.0-42-generic #34~18.04.1-Ubuntu Mar 19 21:00:36 kees-G3-3590 kernel: [5.601359] Hardware name: Dell Inc. G3 3590/061RYD, BIOS 1.8.0 11/11/2019 Mar 19 21:00:36 kees-G3-3590 kernel: [5.601364] RIP: 0010:skl_hda_hdmi_jack_init+0x3f/0x110 [snd_soc_skl_hda_dsp] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868105 Title: No Sound, dummy output in settings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-osp1/+bug/1868105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868105] Re: No Sound, dummy output in settings
Booting 5.0.0-1040-oem-osp1 fixes the audio problem for me. Both 5.0.0-1043-oem-osp1 and 5.3.0-42 have the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868105 Title: No Sound, dummy output in settings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-osp1/+bug/1868105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1851470] Re: cephfs mounts hangs machine when written to
The problem as far as i can tell is that https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/3/862 this revert never got applied to those kernels. Which makes them unstable. 5.0.0-32+ and 4.15.0-66+ are effected -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851470 Title: cephfs mounts hangs machine when written to To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1851470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773859] Re: upgrades to 18.04 fail
Hmm, I don't have any systems left with systemd-shim installed, so I can't do a "real world" test of this. The test case is the description seems reasonable, so if that passes, I would consider this bug fixed. :) Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773859 Title: upgrades to 18.04 fail To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1773859/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1834253] [NEW] package libglib2.0-0:arm64 2.48.2-0ubuntu4.2 failed to install/upgrade: package libglib2.0-0:arm64 is already installed and configured
Public bug reported: happend in upgrade proces ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: libglib2.0-0:arm64 2.48.2-0ubuntu4.2 Uname: Linux 4.9.118+ aarch64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18 AptdaemonVersion: 1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu14 Architecture: arm64 Date: Tue Jun 25 20:40:58 2019 DuplicateSignature: package:libglib2.0-0:arm64:2.48.2-0ubuntu4.2 Processing triggers for mime-support (3.59ubuntu1) ... dpkg: error processing package libglib2.0-0:arm64 (--configure): package libglib2.0-0:arm64 is already installed and configured ErrorMessage: package libglib2.0-0:arm64 is already installed and configured RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.5 apt 1.2.32 SourcePackage: dpkg Title: package libglib2.0-0:arm64 2.48.2-0ubuntu4.2 failed to install/upgrade: package libglib2.0-0:arm64 is already installed and configured UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: already-installed apport-package arm64 xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834253 Title: package libglib2.0-0:arm64 2.48.2-0ubuntu4.2 failed to install/upgrade: package libglib2.0-0:arm64 is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1834253/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1830746] Re: memlock setting in systemd (pid 1) too low for containers (bionic)
** Patch added: "fix-memlock-bump.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1830746/+attachment/5267179/+files/fix-memlock-bump.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1830746 Title: memlock setting in systemd (pid 1) too low for containers (bionic) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1830746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1830746] [NEW] memlock setting in systemd (pid 1) too low for containers (bionic)
Public bug reported: See also https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org/t/limits-kernel-memlock- cannot-exceed-16777216/4856/5 In containers, the limits.kernel.memlock cannot exceed 16777216 when the container is bionic. The memlock setting is set to 16M in systemd and cannot be bumped up in an unprivileged container. This is fixed in upstream systemd. Container ubuntu version: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS Release:18.04 Codename: bionic systemd package version: 237-3ubuntu10.21 ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1830746 Title: memlock setting in systemd (pid 1) too low for containers (bionic) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1830746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767172] Re: Regression: /etc/modules checked against blacklist or it's really hard to load blacklisted watchdog modules when one really wants one
I think it's fine. It sounds like there will just be no way to override package-installed blacklists any more. That's unfortunate, but it's a very rare situation. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767172 Title: Regression: /etc/modules checked against blacklist or it's really hard to load blacklisted watchdog modules when one really wants one To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1767172/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305901]
So I'd like to bring this back up and reiterate the issue: there is no benefit to the early truncation, and it actively breaks lots of existing software (which is why Debian and Ubuntu have had this fix for 10 years now). What is the _benefit_ of early truncation that justifies breaking so many existing cases? Can glibc please take this patch? http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/CbrxmSfKD4/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305901 Title: Intrepid gcc -O2 breaks string appending with sprintf(), due to fortify source patch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/305901/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305901]
It's not defined in POSIX, but it has worked a certain way in glibc for decades. There's no _reason_ to break it for _FORTIFY_SOURCE. Pre- truncating just silently breaks programs and does weird stuff. If you want to expose it with _FORITFY_SOURCE then have vsprintf notice that the target and first format argument are the same variable, and refuse to build. Either pretruncation should be eliminated, or the undefined behavior should be explicitly detected and dealt with. Just having programs lose data while running with no indication of the cause seems like a terrible user experience. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305901 Title: Intrepid gcc -O2 breaks string appending with sprintf(), due to fortify source patch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/305901/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305901]
I'd still like to have this patch applied -- while we can claim the behavior is "undefined", it is not, in fact, undefined. It behaves one way without -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, and differently with it. And that difference doesn't need to exist. Ubuntu carried this patch for quite a while. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305901 Title: Intrepid gcc -O2 breaks string appending with sprintf(), due to fortify source patch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/305901/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1640208] Re: Confusion between "scantool" and "freediag
I have no idea how that connection happened. Seems like something automatic in Launchpad? I've dropped the linkage on the scantool side now. Weird! ** Changed in: scantool (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640208 Title: Confusion between "scantool" and "freediag To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scantool/+bug/1640208/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1803929] Re: Summary: Kernel bug (unhandled paging request) on "udisksctl power-off"
Unfortunately 4.4.0-140 does not solve this problem. Going back to 4.4.0-138 solved the problem here as well too -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803929 Title: Summary: Kernel bug (unhandled paging request) on "udisksctl power- off" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1803929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1771650] Re: openvpn startup script isn't working in ubuntu 18.04
It shouldn't be necessary to do explicit "enable" calls to make this work. The generator _should_ be finding all the .conf files automatically: /lib/systemd/system-generators/openvpn-generator However, it is NOT working for me... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771650 Title: openvpn startup script isn't working in ubuntu 18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/1771650/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1783651] Re: Please enable CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING
Oh no, leave CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING_NO_SANITY=y. Things get REALLY slow without that, and the default kernel is built with hibernation, so I would expect to do =y for that option. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783651 Title: Please enable CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1783651/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1783651] Re: Please enable CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING
To clarify, I'm suggesting: CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING=y CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING_ZERO=y CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING_NO_SANITY=y this should have no impact on regular boots, and if someone boots with "page_poison=1" then they get page wiping when page_alloc pages are freed (and then GFP_ZERO is a no-op since it was already freed), so it becomes a reasonable trade-off on performance vs gaining the wipe-on- free ability of the buddy allocator. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783651 Title: Please enable CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1783651/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1783651] [NEW] Please enable CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING
Public bug reported: I'd like to be able to use page poisoning, but CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING is not enabled on Ubuntu. (This option itself has a near-zero performance impact since it must be combined with the boot option "page_poison=1" to actually enable the poisoning.) To make the poisoning (when enabled) less of an impact, I'd also like to see CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING_ZERO=y too, which means GFP_ZEROing can be skipped. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783651 Title: Please enable CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1783651/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773859] Re: upgrades to 18.04 fail
# dpkg -L systemd-shim /. /usr /usr/lib /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/systemd-shim /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/systemd-shim-cgroup-release-agent /usr/lib/systemd /usr/lib/systemd/ntp-units.d /usr/lib/systemd/ntp-units.d/systemd-shim.list /usr/share /usr/share/dbus-1 /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service package diverts others to: /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service.systemd /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/systemd-shim /usr/share/doc/systemd-shim/copyright /usr/share/doc/systemd-shim/changelog.Debian.gz # cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/systemd-shim.postrm #!/bin/sh set -e if [ "$1" = remove -o "$1" = purge ]; then dpkg-divert --package systemd-shim --remove --rename --divert \ /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service.systemd \ /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service fi # Automatically added by dh_installdeb dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.systemd-shim.conf 8-4 systemd-shim -- "$@" # End automatically added section # Automatically added by dh_installdeb dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.systemd1.conf 6-2 systemd-shim -- "$@" # End automatically added section The error was: Removing systemd-shim (9-1bzr4ubuntu1) ... Removing 'diversion of /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service to /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service.systemd by systemd-shim' dpkg-divert: error: rename involves overwriting '/usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service' with different file '/usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service.systemd', not allowed I have no idea what the dpkg-divert error means there, but I assume there's some interaction I'm not following with the divert... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773859 Title: upgrades to 18.04 fail To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1773859/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773859] Re: upgrades to 18.04 fail
# cat /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service [D-BUS Service] Name=org.freedesktop.systemd1 User=root Exec=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/systemd-shim -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773859 Title: upgrades to 18.04 fail To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1773859/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1593924] Re: systemd-shim was not installed in 16.10 and now cannot purge or remove
** Package changed: libjpeg-turbo (Ubuntu) => systemd-shim (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593924 Title: systemd-shim was not installed in 16.10 and now cannot purge or remove To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd-shim/+bug/1593924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773859] [NEW] upgrades to 18.04 fail
Public bug reported: $ sudo apt upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: systemd-shim 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 71.7 kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 63 files and directories currently installed.) Removing systemd-shim (9-1bzr4ubuntu1) ... Removing 'diversion of /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service to /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service.systemd by systemd-shim' dpkg-divert: error: rename involves overwriting '/usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service' with different file '/usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service.systemd', not allowed dpkg: error processing package systemd-shim (--remove): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: systemd-shim E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Commenting out the dpkg-divert in systemd-shim's postrm solved this for me and I was about to continue the upgrade. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: systemd-shim (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: systemd-shim (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd-shim (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773859 Title: upgrades to 18.04 fail To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1773859/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1766052] Re: Incorrect blacklist of bcm2835_wdt
ping... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766052 Title: Incorrect blacklist of bcm2835_wdt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1766052/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767172] Re: Regression: /etc/modules checked against blacklist
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/8830 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767172 Title: Regression: /etc/modules checked against blacklist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1767172/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767172] [NEW] Regression: /etc/modules checked against blacklist
Public bug reported:
Before systemd-modules-load, /etc/init.d/kmod would load modules
directly with "modprobe" (and _not_ "modprobe -b"):
load_module() {
local module args
module="$1"
args="$2"
if [ "$VERBOSE" != no ]; then
log_action_msg "Loading kernel module $module"
modprobe $module $args || true
else
modprobe $module $args > /dev/null 2>&1 || true
fi
}
However, under 18.04, systemd-modules-load will _ignore_ modules that
are manually listed in /etc/modules and process them with the blacklist
(the same as "modprobe -b" would). This means that it is not possible to
manually load modules that are blacklisted (like watchdog modules):
systemd-238/src/modules-load/modules-load.c:
static int load_module(struct kmod_ctx *ctx, const char *m) {
const int probe_flags = KMOD_PROBE_APPLY_BLACKLIST;
...
default:
err = kmod_module_probe_insert_module(mod, probe_flags,
NULL, NULL, NULL,
NULL);
if (err == 0)
log_info("Inserted module '%s'",
kmod_module_get_name(mod));
else if (err == KMOD_PROBE_APPLY_BLACKLIST)
log_info("Module '%s' is blacklisted",
kmod_module_get_name(mod));
Blacklists should _not_ be applied by systemd-modules-load.
** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767172
Title:
Regression: /etc/modules checked against blacklist
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1767172/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1766052] Re: Incorrect blacklist of bcm2835_wdt
Oops, I missed the "|" ... fixed here: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2018-April/092002.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766052 Title: Incorrect blacklist of bcm2835_wdt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1766052/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1759369] Re: kernel build fails on arm64
** Also affects: gcc-7 (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Also affects: gcc-7-cross (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: High Status: Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1759369 Title: kernel build fails on arm64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1759369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1766052] Re: Incorrect blacklist of bcm2835_wdt
This should fix it: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2018-April/091890.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766052 Title: Incorrect blacklist of bcm2835_wdt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1766052/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1766052] [NEW] Incorrect blacklist of bcm2835_wdt
Public bug reported: Without bcm2835_wdt loaded, Raspberry Pi systems cannot reboot or shut down. This needs to be removed from the automatic blacklist generated by the kernel build that ends up in /lib/modprobe.d/blacklist_linux_$(uname -r).conf ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Artful) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Artful) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766052 Title: Incorrect blacklist of bcm2835_wdt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1766052/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1765484] Re: grub-install should handle /boot/efi on RAID1
The error, specifically, is: Installing for x86_64-efi platform. efibootmgr: option requires an argument -- 'd' ... grub-install: error: efibootmgr failed to register the boot entry: Operation not permitted. Failed: grub-install --target=x86_64-efi WARNING: Bootloader is not properly installed, system may not be bootable -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765484 Title: grub-install should handle /boot/efi on RAID1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1765484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1765484] [NEW] grub-install should handle /boot/efi on RAID1
Public bug reported: I am using grub-efi. I have /boot/efi as a RAID1 with metadata=1.0 at the _end_ of the partition so it can still be seen by UEFI boot firmware as a FAT32 filesystem. grub-install calls efibootmgr with and empty -d argument: efibootmgr -c -d "" ... since it can't figure out what drive /boot/efi is on. With grub-pc, when /boot was on a RAID1, grub-install would get run via the grub-pc postinst for each component of the raid (and/or as a list presented to the user via debconf). For example, with this: # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md0 : active raid1 sda1[2] sdb1[0] 524224 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU] if /dev/md0 was mounted on /boot, grub-pc's postinst would run grub- install on /dev/sda and /dev/sdb. In the UEFI case, if /dev/md0 is mounted on /boot/efi, I would expect efibootmgr to be run multiple times for each component: efibootmgr -c -d /dev/sda1 -L ubuntu-sda1 ... efibootmgr -c -d /dev/sdb1 -L ubuntu-sdb1 ... Dunno about boot ordering, etc. I'm not actually using efibootmgr currently. As a work-around, I ran "dpkg-reconfigure -p low grub-efi" and disabled the NVRAM setting in debconf (to avoid efibootmgr failing grub-install and causing package installs/upgrades to fail). ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765484 Title: grub-install should handle /boot/efi on RAID1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1765484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1750465] Re: package plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text 0.9.2-3ubuntu17 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving triggers unprocessed
I hit this too (on arm64). ** Attachment added: "apt-term.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1750465/+attachment/5069501/+files/apt-term.log ** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750465 Title: package plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text 0.9.2-3ubuntu17 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving triggers unprocessed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1750465/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1751266] [NEW] Missing firmware in linux-image-4.15.0-10-generic
Public bug reported: linux-image-4.15.0-10-generic doesn't have the firmware that linux- image-4.13.0-32-generic has. It doesn't have any of the files that are present in 4.13 in /lib/firmware/4.13.0-32-generic/. For me, this means i can boot 4.15, but my network wont work because of: kernel: [ 13.468996] bnx2 :0b:00.0: Direct firmware load for bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw failed with error -2 kernel: [ 13.468998] bnx2: Can't load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw" ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: linux-image-4.15.0-10-generic 4.15.0-10.11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-32.35-generic 4.13.13 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-32-generic x86_64 AlsaDevices: total 0 crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 feb 23 13:12 seq crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 feb 23 13:12 timer AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay': 'aplay' ApportVersion: 2.20.8-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord': 'arecord' AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: Date: Fri Feb 23 13:50:38 2018 InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-02-14 (9 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Alpha amd64 (20180212) IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iwconfig': 'iwconfig' MachineType: IBM System x3550 M3 -[7944S77]- PciMultimedia: ProcFB: 0 mgadrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.13.0-32-generic.efi.signed root=UUID=4a958e16-f948-4619-bad5-51d238213cc5 ro RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-4.13.0-32-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-4.13.0-32-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.171 RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'rfkill': 'rfkill' SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 11/26/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: IBM Corp. dmi.bios.version: -[D6E158AUS-1.16]- dmi.board.asset.tag: (none) dmi.board.name: 00D4062 dmi.board.vendor: IBM dmi.board.version: (none) dmi.chassis.asset.tag: none dmi.chassis.type: 23 dmi.chassis.vendor: IBM dmi.chassis.version: none dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnIBMCorp.:bvr-[D6E158AUS-1.16]-:bd11/26/2012:svnIBM:pnSystemx3550M3-[7944S77]-:pvr00:rvnIBM:rn00D4062:rvr(none):cvnIBM:ct23:cvrnone: dmi.product.family: System x dmi.product.name: System x3550 M3 -[7944S77]- dmi.product.version: 00 dmi.sys.vendor: IBM ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751266 Title: Missing firmware in linux-image-4.15.0-10-generic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1751266/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1747711] Re: file mis-identifies modern executables as application/x-sharedlib
This is (sort of) a bug in file. The problem is not being able to distinguish between shared objects and PIE binaries. (The latter have INTERP ELF sections and can be run directly.) $ readelf -l /bin/true ... Elf file type is EXEC (Executable file) ... INTERP 0x0238 0x00400238 0x00400238 0x001c 0x001c R 1 [Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2] ... $ readelf -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmagic.so.1.0.0 ... Elf file type is DYN (Shared object file) ...[no INTERP]... $ readelf -l /usr/bin/ssh ... Elf file type is DYN (Shared object file) ... INTERP 0x0238 0x0238 0x0238 0x001c 0x001c R 1 [Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2] So for mime types to distinguish, "file" needs to grow reporting of the INTERP presence. This has become an issue in bionic due to PIE-by-default. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1747711 Title: file mis-identifies modern executables as application/x-sharedlib To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file/+bug/1747711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1726656] Re: package mysql-server-5.7 5.7.20-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I had the same problem. It turns out it was mysql_upgrade exiting with an 'Error occurred: The mysql.session exists but is not correctly configured. The mysql.session needs SELECT privileges in the performance_schema database and the mysql.db table and also SUPER privileges.' The way mysql_upgrade tries to check this requirement is with the query 'SELECT SUM(count)=3 FROM ( SELECT COUNT(*) as count FROM mysql.tables_priv WHERE Table_priv='Select' and User='mysql.session' and Db='mysql' and Table_name='user' UNION ALL SELECT COUNT(*) as count FROM mysql.db WHERE Select_priv='Y' and User='mysql.session' and Db='performance_schema' UNION ALL SELECT COUNT(*) as count FROM mysql.user WHERE Super_priv='Y' and User='mysql.session') as user_priv' which is quite a stupid way to do that. And this failed in my case because i have 2 mysql.session users, one on localhost and one with '%' as host, so even tho my users were set up _exactly_ as mysql_upgrade demanded, it didn't warn me about the multiple users. Great check... Deleting one caused mysql_upgrade to pass and the dpkg system to return to normal (with an apt-get install -f) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726656 Title: package mysql-server-5.7 5.7.20-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.7/+bug/1726656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1725681] [NEW] package amavisd-milter 1.5.0-5 failed to install/upgrade: vereistenproblemen - blijft ongeconfigureerd
Public bug reported: Repeating message. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: amavisd-milter 1.5.0-5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-97.120-generic 4.4.87 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-97-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Oct 18 06:52:04 2017 ErrorMessage: vereistenproblemen - blijft ongeconfigureerd InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-12-21 (303 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.2 apt 1.2.24 SourcePackage: amavisd-milter Title: package amavisd-milter 1.5.0-5 failed to install/upgrade: vereistenproblemen - blijft ongeconfigureerd UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) modified.conffile..etc.default.amavisd-milter: [deleted] modified.conffile..etc.init.d.amavisd-milter: [deleted] ** Affects: amavisd-milter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725681 Title: package amavisd-milter 1.5.0-5 failed to install/upgrade: vereistenproblemen - blijft ongeconfigureerd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-milter/+bug/1725681/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1659801] Re: apparmor rules block ejabberdctl
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #860951 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860951 ** Also affects: ejabberd (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860951 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659801 Title: apparmor rules block ejabberdctl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ejabberd/+bug/1659801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1659801] Re: apparmor rules block ejabberdctl
Add "m" to /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.ejabberdctl's "su" subprofile on /bin/su line: /bin/su rm, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659801 Title: apparmor rules block ejabberdctl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ejabberd/+bug/1659801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1580323] Re: Pull/merge 2016.05~rc3+dfsg1-1 from Debian experimental
Bump. Please get this merged from Debian unstable. I'd like an arm64 rpi3 :) ** Also affects: u-boot (Ubuntu Zesty) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: u-boot (Ubuntu Aa-series) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580323 Title: Pull/merge 2016.05~rc3+dfsg1-1 from Debian experimental To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1580323/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1680315] [NEW] Disable CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE
Public bug reported: In the v4.12 kernel, CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE (which allows disabling selinux after boot) will conflict with read-only LSM structures. Since Ubuntu is primarily using AppArmor for its LSM, and SELinux is disabled by default, it makes sense to drop this feature in favor of the protections offered by __ro_after_init markings on the LSM structures. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9571911/ ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1680315 Title: Disable CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1680315/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658255] Re: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot
... why aren't all the kernels just signed? Why does this need to be a separate package at all? I can confirm installing the -signed package fixes it for me. Where in the kernel source does this signature effect the output of /proc/sys/kernel/secure_boot, though? I can't find that... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658255 Title: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1658255/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658255] Re: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot
the proc handler does:
secure_boot_enabled = efi_enabled(EFI_SECURE_BOOT);
this feature flag is set at boot:
#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE
if (boot_params.secure_boot == EFI_SECURE_BOOT) {
set_bit(EFI_SECURE_BOOT, );
enforce_signed_modules();
pr_info("Secure boot enabled\n");
}
And since I don't see the pr_info, nor the flag, nor the module
enforcement, the boot_params is probably missing?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658255
Title:
Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1658255/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658255] Re: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot
And that must be doing something wrong, since: sudo efivar -p -n $(efivar --list | grep SecureBoot) shows "1" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658255 Title: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1658255/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658255] Re: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot
And it looks like this is specific to the 4.8 kernel. 4.4 thinks secure boot is enabled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658255 Title: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1658255/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658255] Re: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot
Oh, and that's not set up by the bootloader, it's in arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c: boot_params->secure_boot = get_secure_boot(); -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658255 Title: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1658255/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658255] Re: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot
(Hm, dmesg WARN on IOMMU seems to think I need 910170442944e1f8674fd5ddbeeb8ccd1877ea98, but that's unrelated...) ** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1658255/+attachment/4809482/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658255 Title: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1658255/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658233] Re: missing apparmor rules
I added this to the base profile, since other processes tripped over that one. (It's in a separate bug report) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658233 Title: missing apparmor rules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.7/+bug/1658233/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658255] Re: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/secure_boot 0 That seems weird. Everything else thinks it's enabled. What sets this one (and what does it represent)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658255 Title: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1658255/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1639180] Re: no login possible after update to nvidia 304.132
Is this fixed in Xenial? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639180 Title: no login possible after update to nvidia 304.132 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-304/+bug/1639180/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658255] [NEW] Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot
Public bug reported: $ sudo mokutil --sbstate SecureBoot enabled $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled 0 $ sudo insmod ./hello.ko $ echo $? 0 $ dmesg | grep Hello [00112.530866] Hello, world! $ strings /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/lib/test_module.ko | grep signature ~Module signature appended~ $ strings hello.ko | grep signature $ uname -r 4.8.0-34-generic ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658255 Title: Kernel not enforcing module signatures under SecureBoot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1658255/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658236] Re: php abstraction not updated for php7
This creates an upgrade burden on anyone already including the php5 abstraction. I think there should be a single abstraction (named php) but a symlink back to php5 that includes 5 and current... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658236 Title: php abstraction not updated for php7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1658236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658239] [NEW] base abstraction missing glibc /proc/$pid/ things
Public bug reported:
There are yet more glibc-needed files missing from the base abstraction:
--- base2017-01-20 15:37:50.0 -0800
+++ /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/base 2016-12-06 14:13:58.0 -0800
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
/sys/devices/system/cpu/online r,
# glibc's *printf protections read the maps file
- @{PROC}/@{pid}/mapsr,
+ @{PROC}/@{pid}/{maps,auxv,status}r,
# libgcrypt reads some flags from /proc
@{PROC}/sys/crypto/* r,
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658239
Title:
base abstraction missing glibc /proc/$pid/ things
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1658239/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658238] [NEW] apache2 abstraction incomplete
Public bug reported:
Apache2 needs updates for proper signal handling, optional saslauth, and
OCSP stapling...
--- apache2-common 2014-06-24 11:06:06.0 -0700
+++ /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/apache2-common 2015-05-21 07:51:49.0
-0700
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
signal (receive) peer=unconfined,
# Allow apache to send us signals by default
signal (receive) peer=/usr/sbin/apache2,
+ # Allow other hats to signal by default
+ signal peer=/usr/sbin/apache2//*,
# Allow us to signal ourselves
signal peer=@{profile_name},
@@ -25,3 +27,12 @@
/dev/urandomr,
+ # sasl-auth
+ /run/saslauthd/mux rw,
+
+ # OCSP stapling
+ /var/log/apache2/stapling-cache rw,
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658238
Title:
apache2 abstraction incomplete
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1658238/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
