[Bug 1912050] Re: Use after free in libgetdata v0.10.0 may lead to arbitrary code execution
A new version of GetData has been released to address CVE-2021-20204: https://github.com/ketiltrout/getdata/releases/tag/v0.11.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912050 Title: Use after free in libgetdata v0.10.0 may lead to arbitrary code execution To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgetdata/+bug/1912050/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1863282] Re: libreoffice menu bar disappeared
Ubuntu 19.10, using Xmonad as my window manager, and noticed the same thing. Just confirming Darko's observation above - uninstalling libreoffice-gtk3 and restarting lowriter appears to have restored the menus (using some small font, but I only have FHD resolution, so fine with me). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863282 Title: libreoffice menu bar disappeared To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1863282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1788928] Re: psmouse: after sleep/suspend thinkpad touchpad not functional
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1786574 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786574 Chiming in. Lenovo X1C gen 7, with NFC symbol, running Ubuntu 19.10 (5.3.0-24-generic), and trackpad not working after wakeup from suspend (not sure which level, I just close the lid, notice leds slowly blinking, then open it again). Nothing about i2c in any /etc/modprobe.d/* file. Only caveat: running 1.20 system firmware (20QD00L1MX System Firmware) since the latest gives me an unreliable external display when using USB-C/Thunderbolt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788928 Title: psmouse: after sleep/suspend thinkpad touchpad not functional To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1788928/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1080591] Re: shotwell fails to authenticate with non-primary address
> Do you still see a problem related to the one that you reported in a > currently supported version of Ubuntu? Thanks for following up! I don't use Shotwell any more, if nobody else corroborates the report, I suggest you just can close it. -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080591 Title: shotwell fails to authenticate with non-primary address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1080591/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1670959] Re: systemd-resolved using 100% CPU
Just to chime in: Noticed slow machine and systemd-resolved taking 100% cpu. Edited /etc/systemd/resolved.conf to DNSSEC=no (not off, as "no" was commented out in the file). Tried systemctl restart systemd- resolved, but nothing changed. Tried killall systemd-resolved, nothing. Tried killall -9, and it respawned a well-behaved process. I recently installed dnsmasq when my computer failed to resolve anything. This is a fairly up-to-date Ubuntu 17.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670959 Title: systemd-resolved using 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1670959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1740145] [NEW] package libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/hwdb.d/20-sane.hwdb', which is different from other instances of p
Public bug reported: Want to install wine, this package failed in initial install using apt- get ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-21.24-lowlatency 4.13.13 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-21-lowlatency x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Dec 26 17:11:37 2017 DuplicateSignature: package:libsane1:1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1 Unpacking libsane1:i386 (1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-o337ak/133-libsane1_1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/hwdb.d/20-sane.hwdb', which is different from other instances of package libsane1:i386 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/hwdb.d/20-sane.hwdb', which is different from other instances of package libsane1:i386 InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-12-26 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171017.1) Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.3, python3-minimal, 3.6.3-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.14, python-minimal, 2.7.14-2ubuntu1 RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.24ubuntu1 apt 1.5.1 SourcePackage: sane-backends Title: package libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/hwdb.d/20-sane.hwdb', which is different from other instances of package libsane1:i386 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: sane-backends (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package artful package-conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1740145 Title: package libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/hwdb.d/20-sane.hwdb', which is different from other instances of package libsane1:i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1740145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173915] Re: initctl continuously takes 100% of CPU
@Arul, I found something similar in my comment above, at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/1173915/comments/5. But it's been almost 4 years since this issue was reported, and over 2 years since I added my comment, and it's clearly not fixed yet, or even prioritised. In fact, my general experience reporting Ubuntu issues here on launchpad is that this is a black hole, issues are left hanging until they are closed as irrelevant several years later. Critical issues undoubtedly get more attention, but issues such as this are still a problem. Annoying, so I don't really see the point in reporting issues here any more. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173915 Title: initctl continuously takes 100% of CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/1173915/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1638788] Re: [MacBookAir5,2] Resumes immediately after suspend
Sad news since the XHC1 fixes it for me... Must be two bugs then... Ketil -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638788 Title: [MacBookAir5,2] Resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1638788/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1638788] Re: [MacBookAir5,2] Resumes immediately after suspend
I answer this as well: No I did not experience this bug on the 16.04 Ketil -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638788 Title: [MacBookAir5,2] Resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1638788/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1638788] Re: [MacBookAir5,2] Resumes immediately after suspend
Here is more info obviously. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1638788 When I tried to run "echo XHC1 > /proc/acpi/wakeup" - it suspended correctly Ketil -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638788 Title: [MacBookAir5,2] Resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1638788/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: [MacBookAir6,2] Resumes immediately after suspend
Here is more info obviously. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1638788 When I tried to run "echo XHC1 > /proc/acpi/wakeup" - it suspended correctly Ketil -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: [MacBookAir6,2] Resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1638788] Re: Macbook Air resumes immidiately after suspend
I now tested the latest kernel now and the same results. Ketil -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638788 Title: Macbook Air resumes immidiately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1638788/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
Isn't this bug a dubplicate: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1638788 Ketil -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
echo processors > /sys/power/pm_test ** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+attachment/4770257/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
echo platform > /sys/power/pm_test ** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+attachment/4770256/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
echo none > /sys/power/pm_test ** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+attachment/4770259/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
echo core > /sys/power/pm_test ** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+attachment/4770258/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
echo devices > /sys/power/pm_test ** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+attachment/4770255/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
New try: echo freezer > /sys/power/pm_test ** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+attachment/4770254/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
Ah - thanks. I tried to do the last thing from the wiki: sudo sh -c "sync && echo 1 > /sys/power/pm_trace && pm-suspend" and my computer just died. I had to hold power like forever before it would reboot... Ketil -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
echo platform > /sys/power/pm_test gives: none core processors [platform] devices freezer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
echo core > /sys/power/pm_test gives: none [core] processors platform devices freezer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
echo devices > /sys/power/pm_test gives: none core processors platform [devices] freezer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
11) cat /sys/kernel/debug/suspend_stats success: 4 fail: 0 failed_freeze: 0 failed_prepare: 0 failed_suspend: 0 failed_suspend_late: 0 failed_suspend_noirq: 0 failed_resume: 0 failed_resume_early: 0 failed_resume_noirq: 0 failures: last_failed_dev: last_failed_errno:0 0 last_failed_step: -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
echo none > /sys/power/pm_test gives: [none] core processors platform devices freezer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
Ok. I'll do my best. Here I follow the instructions from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelSuspend 1)As described above. The Macbook seems to suspend when closing the lid and then wakes again which is shown by the apple on the back och the lid lightning up 2) Closing the lid (but even doing it through the shut down menu in mate and unity) 3) See 2 4) Attached The rest follows. ** Attachment added: "wakeup" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+attachment/4770119/+files/wakeup -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
echo freezer > /sys/power/pm_test gives: none core processors platform devices [freezer] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616214] Re: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend
I have the same problem on a Macbook pro retina. It works sometimes after a reboot, but always fails again after the first suspend. Ketil -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616214 Title: Macbook Air resumes immediately after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1405232] Re: ping reports wrong IP responding under certain conditions
Couldn't the upstream fix be to time out the DNS resolution? If you don't have an answer in X seconds/milliseconds, never mind and carry on. It's just ping, after all, and it's a good idea to make low level diagnosis independent of higher level functionality, as noted in the Debian bug report. Caching hostnames in ping is a possible strategy, but that's what the local resolver is for. IMHO, that's not something ping should bother doing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405232 Title: ping reports wrong IP responding under certain conditions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iputils/+bug/1405232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1471230] Re: ping got confused about IP-adress after host unreachable
I see I've made a typo regarding icmp_seq in the output of the second run of ping (icmp_seq 1, then 2, and then 1 again, but the last one should be 3). I typed this manually, so there may be other typos as well. But I can't see any typos regarding the main point, I got the ping replies from my own IP address, with times on the order of 0.400ms. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1471230 Title: ping got confused about IP-adress after host unreachable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iputils/+bug/1471230/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1471230] [NEW] ping got confused about IP-adress after host unreachable
Public bug reported: I tried pinging an IP address on an internal network. My IP is 10.0.0.95, and I'm trying to ping 10.0.0.96. Here's what it looked like: $ ping 10.0.0.96 PING 10.0.0.96 (10.0.0.96) 56(84) bytes of data. From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=5 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=7 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=8 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=9 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=10 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=11 Destination Host Unreachable From 10.0.0.95 icmp_seq=12 Destination Host Unreachable 64 bytes from 10.0.0.95: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=5.01ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.95: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.658ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.95: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=0.459ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.95: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=0.432ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.95: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=0.437ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.95: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=0.348ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.95: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=0.485ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.95: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=0.529ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.95: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=0.459ms [snip] ^C --- 10.0.0.96 ping statistics --- 47 packets transmitted, 35 received, +12 errors, 25% packet loss, time 46069ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.348/2.693/70.753/11.712 ms, pipe 3 $ ping 10.0.0.96 PING 10.0.0.96 (10.0.0.96) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.0.0.96: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.324ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.96: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.405ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.96: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.357ms etc... So on the initial run, ping claims it got a ping reply from 10.0.0.95, which isn't the address I'm pinging. It's my host, and it's normal to get the initial ICMP Destination Host Unreachable messages from the local IP when ARP fails. I almost immediately reran ping, and now the host was up from the start, and see responses coming from the actual host that I'm pinging. Looking at the times, the ping replies appear to actually come from 10.0.0.96, or at least some other remote host, based on the time values. If I ping 10.0.0.95 (my own IP), I'm seeing time values of 0.040ms or thereabouts, so an order of magnitude faster. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: iputils-ping 3:20121221-4ubuntu1.1 Uname: Linux 3.17.1-031701-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Fri Jul 3 15:16:40 2015 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-10-09 (266 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140722.2) SourcePackage: iputils UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: iputils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1471230 Title: ping got confused about IP-adress after host unreachable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iputils/+bug/1471230/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1466608] [NEW] Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies
Public bug reported: Not sure resolvconf is the correct place to report this bug, but I'm unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies. A couple of examples are www.sciencedaily.com and www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Interestingly, they resolve when I use dig domain, but if I enter a URL with either of those domains in my browser (tried Chromium and Firefox), then name resolution fails. Ping also fails with a name resolution error message. Here's an example: $ dig www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ; DiG 9.9.5-3ubuntu0.2-Ubuntu www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 8409 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 1280 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. 2358IN CNAME www.wip.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. 2358IN RRSIG CNAME 7 5 86400 20151213102025 20150616102025 52670 ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. dZt9uuyLImbB23vdqcsSK+nWK77BREttiAP80Ovq2/xV48JsII3Uxzxc W8OkLmc5dSdPNkfwc6QFC/+wqe+4ORb1TC4Qxw5HQxo4nCindPFGZAgJ SEFcWRJ2HrU5BKz/MeVMALJ3YN6LSHIwkTIwJbKweTGLQTZPZTryp1M7 UQrqd0hs7tjjwVl/6zRIA5UGgFbdrLwX9jmh4ykBTqK8u0Rt/wrTeHbp UpVMxAUdUW1CJ7xAnn/k4td6zdx7Tm5+CkS99Qva0cPfSSo6Qh4Uplun LKwT9GR4zqBTQRjBWSTf2YdhrAU8oyh9WbQ66WHLYkC8Kp55iskL8E8p E5wOYA== www.wip.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. 30IN A 130.14.29.110 www.wip.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. 30IN RRSIG A 7 6 30 20150708223631 20150617223631 34334 wip.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. aF9abjtGNMz+8NkcTGIY8GwjfZBCcL532B2sdJM891OAP2V9GwPCDGNY VzMPzZjMGN9qHsBgXuFY5jZQNWFvWfIQctTJEZTxClyJyFhe5JbyIspg NIO6ZXxjD3h7Ax/Sr5peyf8mfCU/8FZHPGJOhsNEFOwL3RjIddTK6Ibc PQ55CWOuVrvw26kKj9gxBG8r6iBcKe89xHQYPm1w+Osp8c2twGhqBmfd 7zcRxFLyF0BpY63kcQiF5lJ2fI31x+zCAROL9H3L1jm/K7aMAiO5kuWl DK57upsmtQNzjWX8coYpm7/3Gebfmpjx4BtC75L5IP/WfwVBfzHeRjAG KY/7aQ== ;; Query time: 132 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.1.1#53(127.0.1.1) ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 18 20:26:50 CEST 2015 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 699 $ ping www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ping: unknown host www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov I also watched with tcpdump when trying to look up the domain www.sciencedaily.com, and when I use dig I immediately get the reply, but when trying with ping I don't get any reply, and it gives up after 4 queries are sent. Must have something to do with the DNS flags that are set on the query in the different cases. Here's a lookup with dig: 20:01:47.857269 IP 127.0.0.1.56927 127.0.1.1.53: 9907+ [1au] A? www.sciencedaily.com. (49) 20:01:47.869516 IP 127.0.1.1.53 127.0.0.1.56927: 9907 2/6/43 CNAME ed5n3.x.incapdns.net., A 149.126.72.70 (879) and here's a name resolution triggered by running ping: 20:02:47.969527 IP 127.0.0.1.35905 127.0.1.1.53: 59118+ A? www.sciencedaily.com. (38) 20:02:52.974752 IP 127.0.0.1.35905 127.0.1.1.53: 59118+ A? www.sciencedaily.com. (38) 20:02:57.980296 IP 127.0.0.1.48738 127.0.1.1.53: 3668+ A? www.sciencedaily.com. (38) 20:03:02.985493 IP 127.0.0.1.48738 127.0.1.1.53: 3668+ A? www.sciencedaily.com. (38) I've not experienced this before, though these aren't domains I commonly visit. Is this a new issue? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: resolvconf 1.69ubuntu1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-52.86-generic 3.13.11-ckt18 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-52-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Thu Jun 18 20:23:19 2015 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-10-19 (241 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140722.2) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: resolvconf UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: resolvconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466608 Title: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/+bug/1466608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1466608] Re: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies
Thanks, I was hoping for some help to find the right place to report this. I poked around some more, and I found out what the problem was. First of all, my wireless router was confused. I rebooted it, and then everything started working again. I did some debugging before I rebooted it, though, and the reason for the partial failure situation was that EDNS0 wasn't specified in the queries sent by Ubuntu, but dig specifies it by default (as well as the AD flag, but I don't think that's relevant). A partial result should have been given by the DNS server (on the wireless router), or it should have truncated the reply to force a TCP retry by the client. (Now that everything works, it trims down the Additional section to fit the response.) To confirm, I ran dig like this, and these queries failed on my confused router: dig +noedns +noadflag @127.0.1.1 www.sciencedaily.com So if Ubuntu had in fact set EDNS0 in the query, it would have worked. Falling back to TCP presumably wasn't an option since no malformed/truncated result was received first. Feel free to close this issue if my router's behaviour was completely unacceptable and should cause failure on the client side. If it ought to have been handled better by Ubuntu, however, this may have been an interesting corner case for debugging. Let me know if you need anything else. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466608 Title: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1466608/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1466608] Re: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies
Thanks, I was hoping for some help to find the right place to report this. I poked around some more, and I found out what the problem was. First of all, my wireless router was confused. I rebooted it, and then everything started working again. I did some debugging before I rebooted it, though, and the reason for the partial failure situation was that EDNS0 wasn't specified in the queries sent by Ubuntu, but dig specifies it by default (as well as the AD flag, but I don't think that's relevant). A partial result should have been given by the DNS server (on the wireless router), or it should have truncated the reply to force a TCP retry by the client. (Now that everything works, it trims down the Additional section to fit the response.) To confirm, I ran dig like this, and these queries failed on my confused router: dig +noedns +noadflag @127.0.1.1 www.sciencedaily.com So if Ubuntu had in fact set EDNS0 in the query, it would have worked. Falling back to TCP presumably wasn't an option since no malformed/truncated result was received first. Feel free to close this issue if my router's behaviour was completely unacceptable and should cause failure on the client side. If it ought to have been handled better by Ubuntu, however, this may have been an interesting corner case for debugging. Let me know if you need anything else. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466608 Title: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1466608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1466608] Re: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies
To get Ubuntu to send EDNS0 queries, I can set this in resolv.conf: options edns0 That might work around this bug in my router in the future. And in case anyone is interested, the wireless router is a Netgear WNR2000v5. I think this case can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466608 Title: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1466608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1466608] Re: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies
To get Ubuntu to send EDNS0 queries, I can set this in resolv.conf: options edns0 That might work around this bug in my router in the future. And in case anyone is interested, the wireless router is a Netgear WNR2000v5. I think this case can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466608 Title: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1466608/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1445825] [NEW] Update Manager structures updates wrong
Public bug reported: According to Update Manager, ISC DHCP Client and Common files used by all the isc-dhcp* packages are part of the FreeCAD package, which I get from the FreeCAD Daily PPA: $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/freecad-maintainers-freecad-daily-trusty.list deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/freecad-maintainers/freecad-daily/ubuntu trusty main # deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/freecad-maintainers/freecad-daily/ubuntu trusty main If I simulate a freecad upgrade with apt-get, there's no mention of ISC DHCP. As far as I can tell, ISC DHCP does not have anything to do with FreeCAD, as it shouldn't, so this appears to be a bug in Update Manager. I've attached a screenshot showing what this looks like in Update Manager. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.196.12 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-49.81-generic 3.13.11-ckt17 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-49-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.8 Aptdaemon: Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Sat Apr 18 22:34:13 2015 GsettingsChanges: b'com.ubuntu.update-manager' b'show-details' b'true' b'com.ubuntu.update-manager' b'window-height' b'555' b'com.ubuntu.update-manager' b'first-run' b'false' b'com.ubuntu.update-manager' b'window-width' b'689' b'com.ubuntu.update-manager' b'launch-time' b'1429388830' InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-10-19 (181 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140722.2) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: update-manager UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty ** Attachment added: Screenshot showing wrong structure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1445825/+attachment/4379154/+files/Screenshot%20from%202015-04-18%2022%3A33%3A31.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1445825 Title: Update Manager structures updates wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1445825/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1421204] [NEW] Nautilus slow to react to keyboard input while calculating items in folders
Public bug reported: I am using Nautilus to navigate to a network share with a few hundred folders, and my nautilus is set to display the list view. To fill out the size column, nautilus eagerly traverses all the folders on the network share to find the number of items inside each folder. While it's doing this, keyboard input is ignored (or queued until it's done counting, not sure). When I navigate to a folder, and I know the name of the folder I want to access in the next step, I can usually just type the name of the folder into nautilus, and it jumps to the folder name for me. Instead, I have to wait, or I have to grab the mouse and start browsing. I think the correct behaviour would be to run any such item counting in a way that it doesn't interrupt usability, and give priority to user input. In most cases, I'd type the name of my folder and hit enter to open it quite a lot faster than the time nautilus spends just counting items. That way I'd be saving both time and system resources if nautilus gave priority to the user rather than to stats counting. My folder view in nautilus is sorted by name, not size, so the item counts are only displayed. I'm not actually using them for anything. Removing the size column seems to improve the situation, but I don't consider that an acceptable workaround. Fetching all the Modified times from the server sometimes takes a noticable amount of time as well, so for good responsiveness I may have to remove that as well, as the situation is currently. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: nautilus 1:3.10.1-0ubuntu9.5 Uname: Linux 3.17.1-031701-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.6 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Thu Feb 12 13:58:28 2015 GsettingsChanges: InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-10-09 (125 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140722.2) SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1421204 Title: Nautilus slow to react to keyboard input while calculating items in folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1421204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1409325] [NEW] Ubuntu chooses worst quality when connecting to bluetooth headset
Public bug reported: I have a set of bluetooth headphones, model Arctic P311. When I connect to these with Ubuntu, the selected mode is Telephony Duplex (HSP/HFP). I always want High Fidelity Playback (A2DP). My Android phone and my Windows computer both select the best mode (A2DP), in my experience. At least I don't need to fiddle about to change the mode when using either of those systems. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: unity-control-center 14.04.3+14.04.20140922-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-43.72-generic 3.13.11.11 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-43-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.6 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Sat Jan 10 21:14:12 2015 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-10-19 (83 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140722.2) SourcePackage: unity-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) usr_lib_unity-control-center: activity-log-manager 0.9.7-0ubuntu14 deja-dup 30.0-0ubuntu4 gnome-control-center 1:3.6.3-0ubuntu56.1 ** Affects: unity-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409325 Title: Ubuntu chooses worst quality when connecting to bluetooth headset To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-control-center/+bug/1409325/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 461918] Re: Evince fails to print this PDF
Is this an issue on a supported release? If so, please reopen this report, attach a document this is reproducible with (not post a URL), and execute the following at a terminal: I am unable to test this. For printing, I have to specify a different user name (in .cups/client.conf), and as that is only supported by 'lp', not evince or xpdf (I think), I can no longer print directly from applications. -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461918 Title: Evince fails to print this PDF To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/461918/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173915] Re: initctl continuously takes 100% of CPU
I just had this on my 1 week old new laptop running Ubuntu 14.04.1. I
ran strace -s 128 -p PID where PID was the pid of initctl, and the
output looked like this (small excerpt only included):
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964686) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964682) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964680) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964677) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964675) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964673) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964670) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964668) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964665) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964663) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964660) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964657) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964654) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964650) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964647) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964645) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964643) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964640) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964638) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964636) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964633) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964631) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4198964628) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
I looked in /proc/PID/fd, and it looked like this:
dr-x-- 2 root root 0 okt. 21 07:50 .
dr-xr-xr-x 9 root root 0 okt. 20 10:58 ..
lrwx-- 1 root root 64 okt. 21 07:50 0 - /dev/null
lrwx-- 1 root root 64 okt. 21 07:50 1 - /dev/pts/14
lrwx-- 1 root root 64 okt. 21 07:50 2 - /dev/pts/14
lrwx-- 1 root root 64 okt. 21 07:50 3 - socket:[10190]
I also ran lsof | grep 10190, and the output looked like this:
initctl 1268 root3u unix 0x8800d719d400
0t0 10190 socket
Not sure any of this helps, but that's what it is showing while using
100% cpu. My laptop is a Toshiba Portege Z30 with a dual core i7-4510U
CPU. I'm running arch amd64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173915
Title:
initctl continuously takes 100% of CPU
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/1173915/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997145] Re: affuse fails when mounting E01 files
Yes, as I mentioned about 2.5 years ago when I reported this issue, the fix is to use xmount instead of affuse. :) Still, the reported error Can't open image file: Success was clearly a bug that should be fixed. I don't use affuse any more, so I don't know if that has been changed already. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997145 Title: affuse fails when mounting E01 files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/afflib/+bug/997145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1373250] Re: libjudydebian1 and -dev 1.0.5 installs version 1.0.3
This is confusing, but intentional - the upstream source package (version 1.0.5) nevertheless installs libjudy.so.1.0.3 (which is considered the *interface* version). Note that Red Hat and derived system calls the .so 1.0.5 - which confused me even more :-) ** Changed in: judy (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1373250 Title: libjudydebian1 and -dev 1.0.5 installs version 1.0.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/judy/+bug/1373250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1174098] Re: blockdev doesn't work as reported with loop devices
Proposed package works for me, and I confirmed again that the version I had before upgrading had the same issue. From apt-get output: Unpacking util-linux (2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.2) over (2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.1) ... I don't see where I can change verification-needed to verification-done, however. Hopefully someone else can take care of that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174098 Title: blockdev doesn't work as reported with loop devices To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1174098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1373250] [NEW] libjudydebian1 and -dev 1.0.5 installs version 1.0.3
Public bug reported: I'm trying to debug some segfaults, and currently I suspect the libjudy library. I was surprised to see in the logs that I was using an old version, when I thought I had the newest version installed. Some further investigation revealed: % dpkg -L libjudydebian1 /usr /usr/lib /usr/lib/libJudy.so.1.0.3 : % dpkg -l libjudydebian1 Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ NameVersion Architecture Description +++-===---=== ii libjudydebian1 1.0.5-1ubuntu1 amd64C library for creating and accessing dynamic arrays This is on an uptodate 14.04.1 LTS. ** Affects: judy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1373250 Title: libjudydebian1 and -dev 1.0.5 installs version 1.0.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/judy/+bug/1373250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1315122] Re: Keyboard indicator shows wrong layout, and default layout is not active
Probably a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome- shell/+bug/1303005 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315122 Title: Keyboard indicator shows wrong layout, and default layout is not active To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-keyboard/+bug/1315122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1303005] Re: Keyboard Layout switches back to EN indicator shows DE
Me too! I reported this as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator- keyboard/+bug/1315122, I didn't find this issue at the time. This is still a problem for me on Ubuntu 14.04, and happens fairly regularly. To fix it, I don't need to first select En and then No layout. I simply select No (which is already selected), and then the layout is as it should be. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303005 Title: Keyboard Layout switches back to EN indicator shows DE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1303005/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1317396] Re: VirtualBox fullscreen grabs keyboard, can't type password from locked screen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1305586 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1305586 Could be the same bug, but not necessarily. I guess it depends on whether the modal password prompt and running virtualbox in full screen grabs the keyboard the same way. In any case, I'd like to make this virtualbox issue a security issue. Users will invariably type their passwords into whatever is active in the virtual machine, which could be google searches, chats, documents, facebook status updates - whatever. That's actually very serious. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317396 Title: VirtualBox fullscreen grabs keyboard, can't type password from locked screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1317396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1317396] [NEW] VirtualBox fullscreen grabs keyboard, can't type password from locked screen
Public bug reported: I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 64bit (fresh install) with VirtualBox 4.3.10-dfsg-1, and a Windows 7 professional guest (also 64 bit). I have installed the Guest Additions in the guest OS (from the guest additions Ubuntu package, not downloaded by virtualbox). If I run my guest OS in full screen and Ubuntu locks the screen, I can't log back in again because the keyboard won't type. Searching online I found the same issue reported on the VirtualBox bugtracker: https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/13010 After experiencing this 3 times in an hour, I found that hitting Right- Ctrl (which is the host key in virtualbox) releases the keyboard and I can type again, so that seems to be a successful workaround. Mouse events also appear to be captured, so clicking on menu items on the locked screen (as suggested on the link above) doesn't help, although I can move the pointer with the mouse when I see the locked screen. $ lsb_release -rd: Description: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Release: 14.04 $Â apt-cache policy virtualbox virtualbox: Installed: 4.3.10-dfsg-1 Candidate: 4.3.10-dfsg-1 Version table: 4.3.10-dfsg-1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/multiverse amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: virtualbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317396 Title: VirtualBox fullscreen grabs keyboard, can't type password from locked screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1317396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1317396] Re: VirtualBox fullscreen grabs keyboard, can't type password from locked screen
The same issue is discussed on ubuntuforums here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2220217 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317396 Title: VirtualBox fullscreen grabs keyboard, can't type password from locked screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1317396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1315122] [NEW] Keyboard indicator shows wrong layout, and default layout is not active
Public bug reported: I have Norwegian set as the default layout, and English as the secondary layout. Suddenly passwords stop working, and if I test my keyboard somewhere my writing is visible, I can see that the English layout is actually the one that is active, even though Norwegian is my default layout and it is the one that is shown as active in my indicator. I never change this (on purpose anyway). Just choosing Norwegian again solves the problem. This has happened at the Ubuntu login prompt, but it has usually worked fine. I often suspend and then wake the computer again later, and I can't recall experiencing this at that point, but suddenly a login online fails later. It could be that I've hit some key combo, but the indicator still shows the wrong layout if that's the case. I had this same issue with Ubuntu 13.10 (though never before, and as you can see I've been upgrading my Ubuntu since 11.10 or something like that), but I figured it'd probably just be ignored if I reported it since 14.04 was around the corner, but I've already experienced the same with Ubuntu 14.04. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: indicator-keyboard 0.0.0+14.04.20140410.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Thu May 1 21:04:55 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-04-12 (748 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: indicator-keyboard UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-05-01 (0 days ago) ** Affects: indicator-keyboard (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315122 Title: Keyboard indicator shows wrong layout, and default layout is not active To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-keyboard/+bug/1315122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 906441] Re: intel update 2.15.901 breaks video, reverts to vesa
I stumbled into the same thing: When specifying 'nomodeset' as a kernel parameter on an Intel i915 system (built in HD4400 graphics), I sometimes used to get a black screen in 13.09. In 14.04, the system would come up, but limited to 1024x768 resolution, and the monitor would be undetected (named built in display). xrandr would offer no options, and complain that: xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default My understanding is that nomodeset disables KMS, which causes Xorg to use the Vesa driver, instead of the i915 driver. The Vesa driver then fails to detect the correct monitor resolution. Removing nomodeset and running update-grub appears to fix the problem. I don't think this deserves INVALID, since I feel that: a) vesafb should still be able to at least detect the monitor - and ideally, still be able to change the resolution b) missing KMS should be clearly and accurately reported - both from xrandr, in Xorg.0.log, and in graphics settings panel c) lacking KMS should not disable i915 (or is this unavoidable?) ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906441 Title: intel update 2.15.901 breaks video, reverts to vesa To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/906441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1078695] Re: xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default
I don't know if it is relevant here, but I got the same response from xrandr (about gamma), and also struggled with wrong resolutions. For me, the cause was the 'nomodeset' kernel parameter, this (i.e. disabling kernel modesetting) caused the i915 graphics driver to fail, and the vesa driver to be used instead. Perhaps you can check in /var/log/Xorg.0.log that the correct driver is being used? The log also contains the kernel command linke - although you may have to use 'nomodeset' to get nvidia to work (that was the reason it was in mine - when I removed the graphics card, I forgot to revert the grub options). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078695 Title: xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-utils/+bug/1078695/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 918444] Re: Firefox keeps crashing when browsing websites
Thanks, but this bug report is two years old... I have long since forgotten about this, and I've upgraded Ubuntu (and changed hardware?) a few times. I'm using Firefox 26.0 now, so I can't reproduce this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918444 Title: Firefox keeps crashing when browsing websites To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/918444/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879950] Re: pidgin not showing up
Or, just changing the prefs name='blist' [...] pref name='list_visible' type='bool' value='0'/ from '0' to '1' also brought the window back. I guess this is a Gnomism, Pidgin isn't expected to work without some supporting things running alongside it, panels or whatever, so it starts up minimized, with no way of opening the running applicaiton without a panel or dock or something. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879950 Title: pidgin not showing up To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/879950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879950] Re: pidgin not showing up
Pidgin has been working for me (with the env variable workaround for MS servers), but now suddenly it fails to display a window. Debug (-d) and strace seem to indicate the program is otherwise working. When I Ctrl-C, the window appears to flicker on screen before terminating. While it is running, the window also shows up in xlsclients. I'm not using Unity (just a simple XMonad setup), so if this is indeed the same problem, it's proabably not Unity-related. Ubuntu 13.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879950 Title: pidgin not showing up To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/879950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1130500] Re: Not visible main window
I saw this, but removing .purple/prefs.xml fixed it (i.e. it displayed the window again when I started pidgin, but of course I lost a bunch of my preferences.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1130500 Title: Not visible main window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/1130500/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879950] Re: pidgin not showing up
Removing .purple/prefs.xml fixed it for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879950 Title: pidgin not showing up To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/879950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 856776] Re: Cannot declare itself as another username with CUPS server
I can't believe this is still in. Is CUPS unused in enterprise environments? In my opinion, CUPS is good infrastructure, but it needs a bit of love with documentation and user interaction and so on. Which it somehow isn't getting, and it puzzles me why - most other system critical stuff seems to attract developers more or less automatically... -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856776 Title: Cannot declare itself as another username with CUPS server To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/common-print-dialog-gtk/+bug/856776/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1190709] [NEW] recordmydesktop's capture missing parts of windows
Public bug reported: When I try to capture a video of my desktop with recordmydesktop, large parts of the windows I'm trying to capture details from are missing. It seems that some on-screen changes aren't captured by recordmydesktop. I'm attaching a screenshot. Not sure if this has something to do with X drivers, do I need to disable or change something to record the desktop? Couldn't see any options in recordmydesktop to work around this. Using --full-shots did not help. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: recordmydesktop 0.3.8.1+svn602-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-23.34-generic 3.8.11 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Jun 13 20:57:01 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-04-12 (426 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: recordmydesktop UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-04-30 (44 days ago) ** Affects: recordmydesktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring ** Attachment added: Screenshot of video showing missing parts of windows https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190709/+attachment/3702537/+files/recordmydesktop-missing-sections.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190709 Title: recordmydesktop's capture missing parts of windows To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/recordmydesktop/+bug/1190709/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1190723] [NEW] No way to control istanbul
Public bug reported: From istanbul's man page: istanbul is a program that allow you to record your desktop session. After you started it, you can control it with the icon in the notification area: a click on the icon to start recording, another click to stop. There's no icon in the notification area in unity, so there's no way to control istanbul. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: istanbul 0.2.2-9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-23.34-generic 3.8.11 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Jun 13 21:32:16 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-04-12 (427 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: istanbul UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-04-30 (44 days ago) ** Affects: istanbul (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190723 Title: No way to control istanbul To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/istanbul/+bug/1190723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1185025] [NEW] Ubuntu 13.04 unable to mount Nexenta CIFS shares
Public bug reported: After upgrading to Ubuntu 13.04 I have experienced some compatibility issues when mounting CIFS shares on the Ubuntu 13.04 workstation. The following systems were tested: * Windows 2003 server CIFS shares: Success * EMC VNX CIFS shares: Success * Ubuntu 10.04.2 CIFS shares: Success * Nexenta CIFS shares: Failed All the same shares continue to work from Ubuntu 12.10 systems. So in Ubuntu 13.04, there has arisen a CIFS compatibility issue between Ubuntu and Nexenta. I have also been in touch with our Nexenta supplier, and they have set up a new machine with Nexenta OS with a CIFS share, and a new install of Ubuntu 13.04, and they reproduced the same error. My environment uses AD authentication, but the issue was reproduced without AD authentication, so that's not it. Here's the syslog excerpt from the failed mount, /proc/fs/cifs/cifsFYI was set to 1 (removed date and hostname for brevity): kernel: [ 420.482254] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //10.0.0.27/share1 flags: 0 kernel: [ 420.482266] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: iocharset set to utf8 kernel: [ 420.482274] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Domain name set kernel: [ 420.482277] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: ketil kernel: [ 420.482280] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed dir mode: 0x1ed kernel: [ 420.483011] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 2 with uid: 0 kernel: [ 420.483013] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\10.0.0.27\share1 kernel: [ 420.483023] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created kernel: [ 420.483024] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x6d6 kernel: [ 420.484263] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/fscache.c: cifs_fscache_get_client_cookie: (0x8800b87bcc00/0x8800c6427050) kernel: [ 420.484266] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 3 with uid: 0 kernel: [ 420.484267] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found kernel: [ 420.484272] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: secFlags 0x81 kernel: [ 420.484273] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: NTLMSSP only mechanism, enable extended security kernel: [ 420.484275] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: For smb_command 114 kernel: [ 420.484276] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=78 kernel: [ 420.484495] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 3282 kernel: [ 420.491908] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x5b kernel: [ 420.491919] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=114 mid=1 state=4 kernel: [ 420.491922] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: Dialect: 2 kernel: [ 420.491924] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: negprot rc 0 kernel: [ 420.491926] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Security Mode: 0x3 Capabilities: 0xf3fc TimeAdjust: -7200 kernel: [ 420.491927] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/sess.c: sess setup type 3 kernel: [ 420.491929] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/sess.c: ntlmssp session setup phase 1 kernel: [ 420.491931] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: For smb_command 115 kernel: [ 420.491932] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=206 kernel: [ 420.494445] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x23 kernel: [ 420.494453] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=115 mid=2 state=4 kernel: [ 420.494455] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/netmisc.c: Mapping smb error code 0x10002 to POSIX err -5 kernel: [ 420.494456] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release kernel: [ 420.494457] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/sess.c: ssetup freeing small buf 8800c6421540 kernel: [ 420.494458] CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -5 kernel: [ 420.494461] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 3) rc = -5 kernel: [ 420.494466] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/fscache.c: cifs_fscache_release_client_cookie: (0x8800b87bcc00/0x8800c6427050) kernel: [ 420.494523] /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 2) rc = -5 kernel: [ 420.494524] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -5 To summarize, a change that occurred between Ubuntu 12.10 and Ubuntu 13.04 is causing compatibility issues with the Nexenta CIFS shares. I can't say from the information I have whether it's Ubuntu or Nexenta that is not compliant, but if it is Ubuntu, this may be affecting other systems as well. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: cifs-utils 2:5.5-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-21.32-generic 3.8.8 Uname: Linux
[Bug 1185025] Re: Ubuntu 13.04 unable to mount Nexenta CIFS shares
Here's a successful mount from Ubuntu 12.10 with the same log detail, for comparison: kernel: [ 513.653457] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname: //10.0.0.27/share1 flags: 0 kernel: [ 513.653457] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: iocharset set to utf8 kernel: [ 513.653457] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Domain name set kernel: [ 513.653457] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Username: ketil kernel: [ 513.653457] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1ed dir mode: 0x1ed kernel: [ 513.653457] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 17 with uid: 0 kernel: [ 513.655793] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\10.0.0.27\share1 ip: 10.0.0.27 kernel: [ 513.658701] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created kernel: [ 513.658705] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x6d6 kernel: [ 513.659805] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/fscache.c: cifs_fscache_get_client_cookie: (0x8800d9482c00/0x8800ca73e050) kernel: [ 513.659810] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid: 18 with uid: 0 kernel: [ 513.659812] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess not found kernel: [ 513.659819] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: secFlags 0x7 kernel: [ 513.659824] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: For smb_command 114 kernel: [ 513.659826] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: total_len 82 kernel: [ 513.660138] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 6076 kernel: [ 513.664494] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x5b kernel: [ 513.664509] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=114 mid=1 state=4 kernel: [ 513.664513] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: Dialect: 2 kernel: [ 513.664515] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: negprot rc 0 kernel: [ 513.664517] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Security Mode: 0x3 Capabilities: 0xf3fc TimeAdjust: -7200 kernel: [ 513.664519] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/sess.c: sess setup type 1 kernel: [ 513.664546] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: For smb_command 115 kernel: [ 513.664548] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: total_len 256 kernel: [ 514.690327] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x84 kernel: [ 514.690350] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=115 mid=2 state=4 kernel: [ 514.690353] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release kernel: [ 514.690356] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/sess.c: UID = 1 kernel: [ 514.690357] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/sess.c: bleft 90 kernel: [ 514.690362] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/sess.c: serverOS=Windows 2000 kernel: [ 514.690365] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/sess.c: serverNOS=Windows 2000 LAN Manager kernel: [ 514.690367] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/sess.c: serverDomain=INHOUSE kernel: [ 514.690371] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/sess.c: ssetup freeing small buf 8800d36d5540 kernel: [ 514.690373] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS Session Established successfully kernel: [ 514.690375] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 18) rc = 0 kernel: [ 514.690380] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_tcon as Xid: 19 with uid: 0 kernel: [ 514.690385] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: For smb_command 117 kernel: [ 514.690388] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: total_len 108 kernel: [ 514.691011] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x34 kernel: [ 514.691023] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=117 mid=3 state=4 kernel: [ 514.691026] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: disk share connection kernel: [ 514.691029] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: nativeFileSystem=ZFS kernel: [ 514.691030] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: Tcon flags: 0x1 kernel: [ 514.691033] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_tcon (xid = 19) rc = 0 kernel: [ 514.691034] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS Tcon rc = 0 kernel: [ 514.691039] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/fscache.c: cifs_fscache_get_super_cookie: (0x8800ca73e050/0x8800ca73e0a0) kernel: [ 514.691041] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: In QFSDeviceInfo kernel: [ 514.691044] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: For smb_command 50 kernel: [ 514.691046] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: total_len 72 kernel: [ 514.691657] /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/fs/cifs
[Bug 1174098] [NEW] blockdev doesn't work as reported with loop devices
Public bug reported: According to blockdev's manual: --report Print a report for the specified device. It is possible to give multiple devices. If none is given, all devices which appear in /proc/partitions are shown. Note that the partition StartSec is in 512-byte sectors. However, I'm running Ubuntu installed with wubi, so my root dev is on a loopback device. Here's my /proc/partitions: major minor #blocks name 70 30457856 loop0 71 31457280 loop1 80 732574584 sda 81 26214400 sda1 82 307263488 sda2 83 1 sda3 85 399092736 sda5 So according to the manual, all these devices should be printed with blockdev --report. But they are not, the loop devices are excluded: $ sudo blockdev --report [sudo] password for user: RORA SSZ BSZ StartSecSize Device rw 256 512 4096 0750156374016 /dev/sda rw 256 512 4096 2048 26843545600 /dev/sda1 rw 256 512 4096 52430848314637811712 /dev/sda2 rw 256 512 1024 6669578241024 /dev/sda3 rw 256 512 4096 666959872408670961664 /dev/sda5 $ ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: util-linux 2.20.1-5.1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-27.46-generic 3.5.7.7 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-27-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Apr 28 23:48:07 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-04-12 (381 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: util-linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-11-15 (164 days ago) ** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174098 Title: blockdev doesn't work as reported with loop devices To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1174098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1174098] Re: blockdev doesn't work as reported with loop devices
Turns out blockdev is actually getting an ioctl error on loop devices when run with --report. I had only tested a few values directly, eg using --getsz. Perhaps that is why this happens? $ sudo blockdev --report /dev/loop0 RORA SSZ BSZ StartSecSize Device blockdev: ioctl error on /dev/loop0 $ sudo blockdev --g 60915712 $ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174098 Title: blockdev doesn't work as reported with loop devices To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1174098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791992] Re: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?)
After some time, bandwidth increased to reasonable values, and after some hours, the balance operation completed. After that, performance seems to be okay. I've also added autodefrag as a mount option in fstab, just in case. It worries me that the filesystem degrades like this though. Previous mount options: btrfs defaults,noatime,compress=lzo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791992 Title: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/791992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791992] Re: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?)
Upgraded to 12.10 and 3.5.0-26, the filesystem is still hosed. I'm rerunning a 'balance', but I notice with 'iostat' that disk bandwidth is very poorly utilized (getting a couple of MB/s from each disk, and mostly one at a time). Still, there is now quite a bit of space on all spindles, and it didn't seem to help much. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791992 Title: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/791992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791992] Re: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?)
I see this on 3.2.0-38-generic, I have 3x3TB striped volume with LZO, and it suddenly turned dog slow. It is about 90% full atm. In dmesg I find a bunch of warnings: [2737995.991648] btrfs: block rsv returned -28 [2737995.991649] [ cut here ] [2737995.991655] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-3.2.0/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5985 use_block_rsv+0x17c/0x190 [btrfs]() [2737995.991656] Hardware name: Precision WorkStation T7500 [2737995.991657] Modules linked in: ses enclosure usb_storage ufs qnx4 hfsplus hfs minix ntfs vfat msdos fat jfs xfs reiserfs ext2 dm_crypt nfsd nfs lockd fscache auth_rpcgss binfmt_misc nfs_acl sunrpc lp snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep ppdev snd_pcm dell_wmi parport_pc snd_timer parport i7core_edac sparse_keymap snd shpchp soundcore dcdbas edac_core psmouse serio_raw mac_hid snd_page_alloc btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c usbhid hid mxm_wmi radeon mptsas ttm mptscsih firewire_ohci drm_kms_helper mptbase firewire_core tg3 crc_itu_t scsi_transport_sas drm wmi i2c_algo_bit [2737995.991679] Pid: 45809, comm: btrfs-endio-wri Tainted: GW 3.2.0-38-generic #59-Ubuntu [2737995.991680] Call Trace: [2737995.991682] [81067e0f] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [2737995.991684] [81067e6a] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [2737995.991690] [a023162c] use_block_rsv+0x17c/0x190 [btrfs] [2737995.991697] [a02343fd] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x3d/0x200 [btrfs] [2737995.991699] [81122ecb] ? __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x1b/0x20 [2737995.991708] [a0263b8a] ? read_extent_buffer+0xea/0x180 [btrfs] [2737995.991711] [8165d21e] ? _raw_spin_lock+0xe/0x20 [2737995.991717] [a0223122] __btrfs_cow_block+0x122/0x430 [btrfs] [2737995.991722] [a0223526] btrfs_cow_block+0xf6/0x220 [btrfs] [2737995.991730] [a0272063] ? btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw+0x43/0xb0 [btrfs] [2737995.991736] [a022723a] btrfs_search_slot+0x34a/0x710 [btrfs] [2737995.991743] [a0238988] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x38/0x40 [btrfs] [2737995.991751] [a02534bc] btrfs_drop_extents+0xec/0x930 [btrfs] [2737995.991753] [8116588c] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x10c/0x140 [2737995.991759] [a022251a] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [2737995.991767] [a0246b63] insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.52+0x73/0x270 [btrfs] [2737995.991775] [a0243d4d] ? start_transaction.part.25+0x7d/0x2a0 [btrfs] [2737995.991783] [a024a72a] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x2ca/0x320 [btrfs] [2737995.991791] [a024a7cd] btrfs_writepage_end_io_hook+0x4d/0xc0 [btrfs] [2737995.991799] [a025edc9] end_bio_extent_writepage+0x129/0x180 [btrfs] [2737995.991801] [811adf3d] bio_endio+0x1d/0x40 [2737995.991809] [a023d2ad] end_workqueue_fn+0x5d/0xa0 [btrfs] [2737995.991817] [a026c4f0] worker_loop+0xa0/0x2b0 [btrfs] [2737995.991818] [8165acbc] ? __schedule+0x3cc/0x6f0 [2737995.991827] [a026c450] ? check_pending_worker_creates.isra.1+0xf0/0xf0 [btrfs] [2737995.991829] [8108b19c] kthread+0x8c/0xa0 [2737995.991831] [81667974] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [2737995.991833] [8108b110] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xa0/0xa0 [2737995.991835] [81667970] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13 [2737995.991836] ---[ end trace 66ce02ac277ff6d4 ]--- [2738031.380617] use_block_rsv: 1 callbacks suppressed [2738031.380621] btrfs: block rsv returned -28 [2738031.380623] [ cut here ] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791992 Title: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/791992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791992] Re: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?)
Forgot to add a link to what might be a similar problem: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg20547.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791992 Title: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/791992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791992] Re: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?)
I think this is caused by poorly balanced disks. I.e: nmdbio:~ % sudo btrfs fi show /dev/sdb Label: 'scratch' uuid: 184706ea-89f5-438a-a9f5-b5e91b3ce267 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 7.57TB devid3 size 2.73TB used 2.45TB path /dev/sdc devid2 size 2.73TB used 2.73TB path /dev/sdb devid1 size 2.73TB used 2.73TB path /dev/sda Btrfs v0.20-rc1 Note that two disks are entirely filled up, and only one has free space. If I were to venture a guess, btrfs struggles to shuffle data about in order to write multiple copies of metadata to each spindle. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791992 Title: btrfs in 2.6.38 extremely slow (when near full?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/791992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1096314] Re: Minimizing full screen Virtualbox re-draws full screen with Virtualbox image
I get this too, and I've had it for a long time. I just upgraded to virtualbox 4.2.8 from virtualbox.org, and I still have the same issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1096314 Title: Minimizing full screen Virtualbox re-draws full screen with Virtualbox image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1096314/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1144682] [NEW] Unclear where technical items are hidden
Public bug reported: This is a usability issue. I tried to install Xen using Ubuntu Software Center. First I searched for xen but didn't find the hypervisor. I tried a few options like *xen* and some others, but I only got xenwatch, xenlog and vnc-client among my search results. I gave up and used apt-get. I later discovered: 1. Searching for xen- instead of just xen DOES show xen-hypervisor options. Explain that!? 2. There's a well hidden Show XX technical items at the bottom of the window. This is bad usability. The technical items definition seems useless. Aren't xenwatch, xenlog and vnc-client technical items? What exactly is a technical item? But if you insist on hiding packages like that, there should be a clearly visible meta-entry among the search results to show the rest of the entries. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: software-center 5.4.1.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-25.39-generic 3.5.7.4 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-25-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Mar 4 16:29:15 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-10-25 (861 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set SourcePackage: software-center UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-12-20 (74 days ago) ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144682 Title: Unclear where technical items are hidden To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1144682/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1114530] [NEW] Shotwell gets confused (after cleaning .cache/shotwell?)
Public bug reported: I needed some space and deleted $HOME/.cache/shotwell which took hundreds of MB. The next time I started shotwell, it proceeded to regenerate thumbnails of all images. When exiting shotwell, the GUI disappears, but the process keeps running at 100% for ages (now 30 minutes later). Before exiting shotwell I also tried importing pictures from some cameras. The first import, from an SD card plugged into my laptop's SD card reader, worked fine. When I next tried to import from another camera that was connected with USB, Shotwell just says Starting import, please wait... and Fetching photo information for a long time (probably 45 minutes already). There were 150 images on the camera, so this should be done already. This is the point where shotwell won't go away properly - the process remains running despite clicking the X in the top corner, and when I restart shotwell, it seems to be in the exact same state as when I clicked the X. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: shotwell 0.13.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-23.35-generic 3.5.7.2 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Feb 3 19:48:08 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-04-12 (296 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: shotwell UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-11-15 (80 days ago) ** Affects: shotwell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1114530 Title: Shotwell gets confused (after cleaning .cache/shotwell?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/1114530/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1114545] [NEW] Startup Disk Creator fails when erasing disk
Public bug reported: I am trying to erase a disk with Startup Disk Creator. The processes udisks-daemon and udisks-helper-m(something) run for a long time. I tried stracing the last one, and saw lots of these: write(2, Error: , 7) = 7 write(2, Can't have a partition outside the disk!\n, 41) = 41 write(2, new_size=15927345152 but resulting size, 15926820864, smaller than requested, 76) = 76 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 Then the processes disappeared, and I got a popup window: System program problem detected Do you want to report the problem now? I click that I want to report the problem, after which I have to enter my root password, and then I finally get the error: Sorry, the program udisks-daemon closed unexpectedly Your computer does not have enough free memory to automatically analyse the problem and send a report to the developers. - I have 8GB of RAM on my laptop, and I'm not using it for anything else right now. This seems to be a major flaw with ubuntu-bug as well, I'm unable to report bugs because of bugs. It should always fall back to sending what it can. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: usb-creator-gtk 0.2.40ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-23.35-generic 3.5.7.2 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Feb 3 20:15:20 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-04-12 (296 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: usb-creator UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-11-15 (80 days ago) ** Affects: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1114545 Title: Startup Disk Creator fails when erasing disk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1114545/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1114545] Re: Startup Disk Creator fails when erasing disk
I'm trying again now, and I get the same issues. The second program is invoked like this: udisks-helper-modify-partition /dev/sdb 4194304 15927345152 0x0c boot My /proc/partitions looks like this: $ cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 70 30457856 loop0 71 781312 loop1 80 732574584 sda 81 26214400 sda1 82 307263488 sda2 83 1 sda3 85 399092736 sda5 8 16 15558144 sdb 8 17 15554048 sdb1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1114545 Title: Startup Disk Creator fails when erasing disk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1114545/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1099197] [NEW] gphoto2 backend shows incomplete folder listings
Public bug reported: I imported photos from my Samsung Galaxy S2 phone to Shotwell, but lots of photos were missing. Manually browsing the directory structure on the phone from my computer using Nautilus, I see 514 items in the SAMSUNG_Android/DCIM/Camera folder, the last file dated 14 May 2012. However, browsing the folder /sdcard/DCIM/Camera on the phone itself, I see a lot more items (not numbered, I haven't bothered counting), and there are pictures dated until 13 January 2013. I also see the same files from May 2012 and earlier. So, it appears that the gvfs gphoto2 backend is for some reason showing some, but not all, files and folders on the device. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: gvfs-backends 1.14.0-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-21.32-generic 3.5.7.1 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jan 13 20:59:17 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-04-12 (276 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: gvfs UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-11-15 (59 days ago) ** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099197 Title: gphoto2 backend shows incomplete folder listings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1099197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1099197] Re: gphoto2 backend shows incomplete folder listings
According to Kies Air, there's 1120 pictures in the folder in question. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099197 Title: gphoto2 backend shows incomplete folder listings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1099197/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1092561] [NEW] Python wx package doesn't supply the wx library in a location where python finds it
Public bug reported: Python can't find wx, even though it's installed. Here's a sample session showing the problem: user@ubuntu:~$ echo $PYTHONPATH user@ubuntu:~$ python Python 2.7.3 (default, Sep 26 2012, 21:53:58) [GCC 4.7.2] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import wx Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module ImportError: No module named wx user@ubuntu:~$ PYTHONPATH=$PYTHONPATH:/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/wx-2.8-gtk2-unicode python Python 2.7.3 (default, Sep 26 2012, 21:53:58) [GCC 4.7.2] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import wx I have to manually specify the path to the wx package, otherwise it's not found. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: python-wxgtk2.8 2.8.12.1-11ubuntu3.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-21.32-generic 3.5.7.1 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-21-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Dec 20 15:44:41 2012 InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-10-25 (787 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1) MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set SourcePackage: wxwidgets2.8 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-12-20 (0 days ago) ** Affects: wxwidgets2.8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092561 Title: Python wx package doesn't supply the wx library in a location where python finds it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wxwidgets2.8/+bug/1092561/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1080591] Re: shotwell fails to authenticate with non-primary address
Lucas Beeler 1080...@bugs.launchpad.net writes: Are you using the Ubuntu Online Accounts control panel to set up your Google account or are you configuring it directly in Shotwell? The latter, but it is hard to tell, since it is all `not mere web links, but solid code immersed into the desktop'. I think I saw a popup window which looked like a web page asking for Google authentication at one point, similar to the picture in: http://www.iloveubuntu.net/online-accounts-landed-ubuntu-1210-default I guess I am using UOA, I tried to delete the authorization info I could find in the gconf.xml files under .shotwell, but it didn't seem to change anything. I'll try to hunt and destroy any UOA stuff. Note that since you're running Quantal, unless you built and installed Shotwell from source, the default build of Shotwell that comes with Quantal has been patched downstream to use the Ubuntu Online Accounts system for Google authentication. Hence, this could be a bug either with Shotwell or with Ubuntu Online Accounts. Right, thanks. I really wish people would stop the immersing thing, it just confuses things and makes them more complex and fragile. -k -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080591 Title: shotwell fails to authenticate with non-primary address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/1080591/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1080591] [NEW] shotwell fails to authenticate with non-primary address
Public bug reported: I am trying to export some pictures from Shotwell to my Picasa account. I select Picasa from the publish list, and push the button to authenticate. I am asked for password, which I enter. I am then told that Authentication failed. Subsequent attempts go directly to Authentication failed, and there is no apparent way to enter the password again. Cause: I am using a non-gmail email address to log on to Google. This used to work, but something - presumably Google - has changed this. Suggestions: 1) Shotwell should be more informative about the Authentication Failure, and report what exactly is wrong. I thought I had mistyped the password, and then it's frustrating not to be offered the opportunity to retype it. 2) The login dialog should offer a direct link or pointer to the accounts settings, now I need to select Add an account from the drop down. 3) Incidentally, removing accounts doesn't work, in the end I had to disable two (non-working) instances of Google account configurations. Anyway, not exactly a bug, but hopefully a report that lets Shotwell become even better. Shotwell version 0.13.0-0ubuntu3, on Ubuntu 12.10, 64bit. ** Affects: shotwell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080591 Title: shotwell fails to authenticate with non-primary address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/1080591/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1080591] Re: shotwell fails to authenticate with non-primary address
** Description changed: I am trying to export some pictures from Shotwell to my Picasa account. I select Picasa from the publish list, and push the button to authenticate. I am asked for password, which I enter. I am then told that Authentication failed. Subsequent attempts go directly to Authentication failed, and there is no apparent way to enter the password again. - Cause: I am using a non-gmail email address to log on to Google. This - used to work, but something - presumably Google - has changed this. + (I thought this was due to me logging in with a non-gmail address, and + it seemed to work when I changed to the gmail one, but now it fails + again) - Suggestions: + Further suggestions: 1) Shotwell should be more informative about the Authentication Failure, and report what exactly is wrong. I thought I had mistyped the password, and then it's frustrating not to be offered the opportunity to retype it. 2) The login dialog should offer a direct link or pointer to the accounts settings, now I need to select Add an account from the drop down. 3) Incidentally, removing accounts doesn't work, in the end I had to disable two (non-working) instances of Google account configurations. - Anyway, not exactly a bug, but hopefully a report that lets Shotwell - become even better. Shotwell version 0.13.0-0ubuntu3, on Ubuntu 12.10, 64bit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080591 Title: shotwell fails to authenticate with non-primary address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/1080591/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728350] Re: man lpstat: wrong information about running without arguments
Unfortunately, the CUPS developers - if there indeed are any - do not give a shit. The command line tools are brain dead by design, the documentation is inaccurate, there are essentially no error checking or reporting, and it has been this way since the inception. Here's a bug from 2006 - guess what, this is still the status quo in Ubuntu 12.10, over six years later: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=381252 Command line printing isn't a priority in Ubuntu, nor is difficult corner cases, like specifying a username. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #381252 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=381252 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728350 Title: man lpstat: wrong information about running without arguments To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/728350/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728350] Re: man lpstat: wrong information about running without arguments
Seems like a good idea that would take slightly less than six years to fix: http://www.cups.org/str.php?L1781+P0+S-2+C0+I0+E0+M20+Q1781 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728350 Title: man lpstat: wrong information about running without arguments To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/728350/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1067318] [NEW] RabbitVCS Gedit plugin is for Gedit v2, but Ubuntu is bundled with Gedit v3
Public bug reported: This package contains the rabbitvcs plugin for gedit v2, but since Ubuntu 12.04 is bundled with gedit v3, it doesn't work. It appears others have had the same issue, and have solved it by installing newer packages: http://code.google.com/p/rabbitvcs/issues/detail?id=622 It seems to me that this package may as well be removed from the package repo unless fixed, it just won't work. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: rabbitvcs-gedit 0.13.1-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-32.51-generic-pae 3.2.30 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-32-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu13 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Oct 16 13:36:06 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SourcePackage: rabbitvcs UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-10 (158 days ago) ** Affects: rabbitvcs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067318 Title: RabbitVCS Gedit plugin is for Gedit v2, but Ubuntu is bundled with Gedit v3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitvcs/+bug/1067318/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 904001] Re: Can't start evince over SSH tunnel X session
Thanks, JFBucas, adding this line fixed it for me! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904001 Title: Can't start evince over SSH tunnel X session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/904001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671565] Re: GUI launch fails strangely when done from a secondary login, ssh -X
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 904001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 904001 Can't start evince over SSH tunnel X session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671565 Title: GUI launch fails strangely when done from a secondary login, ssh -X To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/671565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1041211] [NEW] firefox repeatedly crashing on startup when Global Menu Bar Integration enabled
Public bug reported: My browser crashed while streaming video from an online news site. Next time I restarted, there was a new NoScript update installed, and then firefox crashed immediately. After that, firefox would crash within 5 seconds of every restart. After retrying a number of times, firefox detected that it was crashing on startup, and gave me some options to start in safe mode or disable various options and restart. I managed to disable all plugins, and now Firefox is been working again. Enabling one by one plugin, I discovered that the Global Menu Bar Integration causes firefox to crash when I enable it. I'm leaving it disabled for now. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: firefox-globalmenu 14.0.1+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic-pae 3.2.24 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zcommon znvpair zavl zunicode AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12 Architecture: i386 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC269 Analog [ALC269 Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: ketil 2664 F pulseaudio BuildID: 20120713224758 Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf270 irq 46' Mixer name : 'Intel Cantiga HDMI' Components : 'HDA:10ec0269,10cf,0014 HDA:80862802,80860101,0010' Controls : 31 Simple ctrls : 14 Channel: Unavailable Date: Fri Aug 24 15:51:49 2012 ForcedLayersAccel: False IfupdownConfig: auto lo iface lo inet loopback InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1) IpRoute: default via 10.14.0.1 dev eth0 proto static 10.14.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.14.10.64 metric 1 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000 PrefSources: prefs.js [Profile]/extensions/tin...@ideeinc.com/defaults/preferences/pref.js ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=14.0.1/20120713224758 (In use) RelatedPackageVersions: rhythmbox-mozilla 2.96-0ubuntu4.1 totem-mozilla 3.0.1-0ubuntu21 RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no RunningIncompatibleAddons: False SourcePackage: firefox UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-10 (105 days ago) WifiSyslog: dmi.bios.date: 09/18/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: FUJITSU // Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: Version 1.07 dmi.board.name: FJNB203 dmi.board.vendor: FUJITSU dmi.board.version: F4 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: FUJITSU dmi.chassis.version: LIFEBOOK P8110 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnFUJITSU//PhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvrVersion1.07:bd09/18/2009:svnFUJITSU:pnLIFEBOOKP8110:pvr10601127896:rvnFUJITSU:rnFJNB203:rvrF4:cvnFUJITSU:ct10:cvrLIFEBOOKP8110: dmi.product.name: LIFEBOOK P8110 dmi.product.version: 10601127896 dmi.sys.vendor: FUJITSU ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041211 Title: firefox repeatedly crashing on startup when Global Menu Bar Integration enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1041211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1041211] Re: firefox repeatedly crashing on startup when Global Menu Bar Integration enabled
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041211 Title: firefox repeatedly crashing on startup when Global Menu Bar Integration enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1041211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035305] Re: Crash when switching apps back to Firefox (may be Firebug related)
I'm running Ubuntu 12.04 with all updates applied, and I got this bug today. I fixed it by disabling the Global Menu Bar Integration plugin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035305 Title: Crash when switching apps back to Firefox (may be Firebug related) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firebug/+bug/1035305/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 998864] Re: Shotwell's menu disappeared from Unity
This situation has only arisen once, but when it first started, it kept on happening until I rebooted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998864 Title: Shotwell's menu disappeared from Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/998864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 998864] [NEW] Shotwell's menu disappeared from Unity
Public bug reported: I have a pretty fresh upgrade of Ubuntu 12.04. I was trying to import some pictures from a folder using Shotwell, but for some reason the import button (in the folder select dialog) failed. After that, I had trouble ending Shotwell, and I think this was when the menu items along the top of the screen stopped appearing. I managed to end shotwell by changing desktops and minimizing and maximizing the app a few times, then the (X) worked. After I restarted Shotwell, the top menus still would not work. See attached top corner of full screenshot, showing the top menu bar, with only the window close, minimize and maximize buttons, but no menus. I'm assuming this is a Unity issue, and not Shotwell. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: unity 5.12-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,grid,vpswitch,gnomecompat,regex,snap,place,imgpng,mousepoll,session,resize,move,unitymtgrabhandles,wall,animation,fade,scale,workarounds,expo,ezoom,unityshell] Date: Sun May 13 21:04:04 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-28 (15 days ago) ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998864 Title: Shotwell's menu disappeared from Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/998864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 998864] Re: Shotwell's menu disappeared from Unity
** Attachment added: Screenshot showing top menu bar without program menus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998864/+attachment/3145060/+files/shotwell-menu-missing.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998864 Title: Shotwell's menu disappeared from Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/998864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997145] [NEW] affuse fails when mounting E01 files
Public bug reported:
When attempting to mount an E01 file with affuse, it fails with:
$ sudo affuse test.E01 /mnt/tmp
Can't open image file: Success
Rerunning with strace to see what's going on, I see that affuse never
even tries to open test.E01, but dies before getting that far. Here are
the last 9 lines output in the strace log:
dup(2) = 3
fcntl(3, F_GETFL) = 0x8002 (flags O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE)
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 1), ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x7fe8af4d7000
lseek(3, 0, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek)
write(3, Can't open image file: Success\n, 31) = 31
close(3)= 0
munmap(0x7fe8af4d7000, 4096)= 0
exit_group(1) = ?
So it apparently tries to lseek() to the current offset(!) in file
descriptor 3, which is a duplicate of file descriptor 2, which is
STDERR.
As far as I know, this was a bug in Ubuntu 11.10 as well, but worked
fine in Ubuntu 11.04.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: afflib-tools 3.6.6-1.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed May 9 16:35:01 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012)
ProcEnviron:
TERM=xterm
SHELL=/bin/bash
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: afflib
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-09 (0 days ago)
** Affects: afflib (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997145
Title:
affuse fails when mounting E01 files
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/afflib/+bug/997145/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997145] Re: affuse fails when mounting E01 files
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997145 Title: affuse fails when mounting E01 files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/afflib/+bug/997145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997145] Re: affuse fails when mounting E01 files
I have verified that the same happens if I create the image witih ewfacquire. This test can be done quite simply: $ dd if=/dev/zero of=img.dd bs=1M count=256 $ mkfs.ext2 img.dd# not necessary, just to make this a little more realistic $ ewfacquire -c fast -t image img.dd # use defaults $ sudo affuse image.E01 /mnt Can't open image file: Success -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997145 Title: affuse fails when mounting E01 files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/afflib/+bug/997145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997145] Re: affuse fails when mounting E01 files
It turns out ewf support was removed from afflib-tools. The fix is to use xmount instead. Instead of supporting ewf again, perhaps affuse should report an error instead of failing with Success. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997145 Title: affuse fails when mounting E01 files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/afflib/+bug/997145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997307] Re: lcpci -vvv gives pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Connection timed out
** Attachment added: lscpi -vnvn https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997307/+attachment/3138988/+files/lspci-vnvn.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997307 Title: lcpci -vvv gives pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Connection timed out To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/997307/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997307] [NEW] lcpci -vvv gives pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Connection timed out
Public bug reported:
I get an error from lspci -vvv:
$ sudo lspci -vvv /dev/null
pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Connection timed out
Repeating with strace to see what's going on:
$ sudo strace lspci -vvv /dev/null
[snip]
open(/sys/bus/pci/devices/:05:00.0/vpd, O_RDONLY) = 4
pread(4, 0x7fffeec46a2e, 1, 0) = -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
write(2, pcilib: , 8pcilib: ) = 8
write(2, sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Con..., 49sysfs_read_vpd: read failed:
Connection timed out) = 49
write(2, \n, 1
) = 1
pread(3, \1\0\1\30, 4, 256) = 4
pread(3, \0\0\20\0\0\0\0\0!\0\6\0\300\21\0\0\0 \0\0\264\0\0\0, 24, 260) = 24
pread(3, \3\0\1\0, 4, 384)= 4
pread(3, \377\351\332\24\303{\303\377, 8, 388) = 8
readlink(/sys/bus/pci/devices/:05:00.0/driver,
../../../../bus/pci/drivers/atl1c, 1024) = 33
close(3)= 0
close(4)= 0
write(1, 1, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 512n..., 4013) = 4013
exit_group(0) = ?
This is a fresh install of Ubuntu 12.04 on an Asus U36SD laptop.
$ cat /proc/version_signature
Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
I'm attaching lspci-vnvn.log, running that command also gave the same
error message again.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic 3.2.0-24.37
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC269VB Analog [ALC269VB Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: ketil 2063 F pulseaudio
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'PCH'/'HDA Intel PCH at 0xdf00 irq 22'
Mixer name : 'Intel CougarPoint HDMI'
Components : 'HDA:10ec0269,10431ba3,00100100
HDA:80862805,80860101,0010'
Controls : 29
Simple ctrls : 13
Date: Wed May 9 21:53:00 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012)
MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. U36SD
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
TERM=xterm
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-24-generic
root=UUID=A04E97D64E97A416 loop=/hostname/disks/root.disk ro quiet splash
i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 pci=nomsi vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
linux-restricted-modules-3.2.0-24-generic N/A
linux-backports-modules-3.2.0-24-generic N/A
linux-firmware1.79
SourcePackage: linux
StagingDrivers: mei
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-28 (11 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 07/12/2011
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: U36SD.205
dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
dmi.board.name: U36SD
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrU36SD.205:bd07/12/2011:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnU36SD:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnU36SD:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct10:cvr1.0:
dmi.product.name: U36SD
dmi.product.version: 1.0
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise staging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997307
Title:
lcpci -vvv gives pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Connection timed
out
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/997307/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997307] Re: lcpci -vvv gives pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Connection timed out
Hmm, I just noticed these in dmesg, I guess that might be the issue. Is this likely to be a correct diagnosis, or can I do something to improve the situation? atl1c :05:00.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update. I don't really know if this matters much, but there's a bug somewhere... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997307 Title: lcpci -vvv gives pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Connection timed out To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/997307/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 954127] [NEW] Network configuration fails during installation of 12.04
Public bug reported: Under installation of 12.04, network configuration with dhcp failed. I was still able to configure the network by switching to a console and running 'dhclient' manually. I notice the installer runs dhclient with a specific config file, perhaps this somehow interferes with my DHCP server? ** Affects: dhcp3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954127 Title: Network configuration fails during installation of 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dhcp3/+bug/954127/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
