[Bug 1770565] Re: [i915_bpo] Fix flickering issue after panel change
Since installing this kernel, I see instant screen garbage or blanking (everything but the cursor), when attaching / removing a second / third screen on My Lenovo Thinkpad T440s. Older kernels do not suffer these problems. A restart of lightdm makes the problems go away and makes a second screen be detected as expected. What logs would be usefull? Xorg.0.log doesn't realy have anything out of the ordinary, nor does Dmesg. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770565 Title: [i915_bpo] Fix flickering issue after panel change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1770565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74635] Re: Konica Minolta native printer drivers not included
I would like to see the importance of this bug be increased, i'm ready to roll out ubuntu on all systems in a small office, but to provide a quick and easy re-installation procedure, i need this driver to be included by default. As the driver works like a charm, and only needs a small fix, i suggest getting this done asap. -- Konica Minolta native printer drivers not included https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108189] Re: files list file for package `*' is missing final newline
Your list file is almost completely correct, the end however is missing. If you know xml you can try to fix it by adding the end tags. (try opening it in firefox after renaming the extention to .xml) But you can never be sure if you need to add just the closing tags, or if there's more information missing. -- files list file for package `*' is missing final newline https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108189] Re: files list file for package `*' is missing final newline
Hi, The install was a brand new install from the 7.04 dvd, It was installed onto a 36gb scsi disk connected to a compaq 5300 smartarray controller inside a quad opteron. The filesystem for / is ext3 /home is mounted on a sata disk also with ext3. I use the default english language and i guess also the default charset. Il try to recreate the invalid files, and zip the folder. The attachment contains the broken file, which has the same contents as the rest of the files in the folder. I checked the md5 sums on the .deb files for the broken packages, but they are okay. With regards Jan -- files list file for package `*' is missing final newline https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99747] Re: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/language-pack-gnome-en_1%3a6.06+20070311_all.deb (--unpack): when using apt-get upgrade
Hi I just discovered this bug, It seems the files list for these packages is corrupted, I had the same error on multiple other packages. It helped to delete all files from within the following folder /var/lib/dpkg/info/: sudo rm /var/lib/dpkg/info/* Since all files in that folder seem to be the same format length and content, i don't think dpkg realy needs them. -- error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/language-pack-gnome-en_1%3a6.06+20070311_all.deb (--unpack): when using apt-get upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108189] files list file for package `*' is missing final newline
Public bug reported: APt-get, adept, and the restricted drivers manager might halt installing packages when one or more of the files in: /var/lib/dpkg/info/ is corrupt. The error shown will be either: files list file for package `*' is missing final newline Or: files list file for package `*' contains an empty filename Where * start is a random but steady per install package name. Adding a newline char to the file changes the message form the first to the seccond error noting about the empty filename. Since all these files seem to contain only a string of @[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] it seems they are redundant, and i ventured on moving them from the folder, this solved the problem. Two things need to be resolved here i guess, 1: dpkg should handle these files more gracefully, there's an abundance of forum posts and related bugs available from people who have no clue where to search, deleting them seems to work, so why not delete them when dpkg encounters this error. 2: Since all these files essentially contain the same data, why are they even here, there's 4200 of them in a default feisty install, the installer works fine without, so why are they here? ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- files list file for package `*' is missing final newline https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108189] Re: files list file for package `*' is missing final newline
Here's the first offending file from my system. ** Attachment added: offending file, copy it to your folder, and see what happens http://librarian.launchpad.net/7370144/ico.list -- files list file for package `*' is missing final newline https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99747] Re: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/language-pack-gnome-en_1%3a6.06+20070311_all.deb (--unpack): when using apt-get upgrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 108189 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108189 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 108189 files list file for package `*' is missing final newline -- error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/language-pack-gnome-en_1%3a6.06+20070311_all.deb (--unpack): when using apt-get upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74302] Re: Actually in all of my packages
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 108189 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108189 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 108189 files list file for package `*' is missing final newline -- Actually in all of my packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98991] Re: upgrade feisty beta fails on e2fslibs and or ubuntu-user-guide
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 108189 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108189 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 108189 files list file for package `*' is missing final newline -- upgrade feisty beta fails on e2fslibs and or ubuntu-user-guide https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98991 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102943] Re: Allow displaying only strings that have no suggestions
This is a much needed addition, It helps translators like me, who can only make suggestions to effectively filter on strings which have no translation what so ever, helping the official translators by supplying a translation. -- Allow displaying only strings that have no suggestions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80967] Re: gnome-web-photo integration as html printer
Hmm, sounds like a plan, I think better mime-type based printing in the gnome desktop is needed to bring everything up to the level both windows and osX are. Where do i go to get this done? Gnome, of freedesktop.org? -- gnome-web-photo integration as html printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80967 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47526] Re: Boot fails after 6.06 server install on Compaq Proliant DL360
Dan, Thanks, Il try this tonight, altough i think i allready did this. I guess this is with a 7.04 livecd right? I tried modprobe cpqarray on the cli of the live-cd prior to running the steps from the installer, but i didn;t think that helped me beyond the paritioner, I've currently got debian 4.0 installed which works great. but ill try tonight, -- Boot fails after 6.06 server install on Compaq Proliant DL360 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47526] Re: Boot fails after 6.06 server install on Compaq Proliant DL360
Rumor was wrong, cpqarray still breaks on 6.10 I tried both the alternate cd, and normald server install, both don't work. This was testen on a compaq smartarray 5300 controller inside a DL380 g1 -- Boot fails after 6.06 server install on Compaq Proliant DL360 https://launchpad.net/bugs/47526 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102762] stop update-notifier when updates have been run, or when no updates available
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-notifier I'd like to propose a way of saving a couple of MB's on the avarage system. I noticed that when ubuntu starts, it also starts the update-notifier process, which presumably handles the finding of updates, and displaying of the update notifier icon in the gnome tray. I propose stopping the process when one of two conditions are met: 1) No updates found. 2) All updates run. I know that update manager checks for updates on more occasions then just system boot, so i'd like to also propose a connecting scheme like firefox uses for directing multiple processes into one. Eg, the system boots, finds updates, notifies the user, The user runs all the updates, update-notifier stops. Either a set time runs by and update-notifier gets started again trough cron. (to check for updates on the following day) Or, the user selects a new repository, and by doing this, also starts the update-notifier. The firefox like start scripts should make sure that just one update- notifier is running at any time. This is one of those little adjustments that saves memmory, and sets the bar a little lower for low-memmory systems. Its also pretty save to change, as on the avarage desktop, there's a reboot and thus a normale start for update-notifier every day anyway, ** Affects: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- stop update-notifier when updates have been run, or when no updates available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47526] Re: Boot fails after 6.06 server install on Compaq Proliant DL360
Dan, My install did a 2.6.17-14 install. I also tried a 7.04 feisty install but that livecd couldn't recognize the array size. -- Boot fails after 6.06 server install on Compaq Proliant DL360 https://launchpad.net/bugs/47526 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97350] 7.04 beta cpqarray module reports 0 bytes size for disks, whereas 6.10 livecd recognized the correct size.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gparted I tried to install 6.10 alternate server install on my DL380, but due to a known bug i cannot get the cpqarray driver to load on boot. The live-cd however runs fine, and reports the correct size for the raid 5 array. It mentions the fact that it cannot accurately recognize the size of the disk, but that's possibly the seccond array the controller is exporting, as that one is recognized as 0, (as it should be, since that array has no disks) The 7.04 server cd however is unable to detect the size for both arrays, and thus cannot install. Manual paritioning or guided partitioning both fail. This is a regression on 6.10. 7.04 is however needed to avoid the kernel bug that stops the cpqarray module to load correctly on 6.10. ** Affects: gparted (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- 7.04 beta cpqarray module reports 0 bytes size for disks, whereas 6.10 livecd recognized the correct size. https://launchpad.net/bugs/97350 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80967] Re: gnome-web-photo integration as html printer
Sebastien, Sorry for not responding earlier, I think nautilus misses the option to print a selection of html files through for example gnome-web-photo. Windows automatically recognizes a series of html files, and renders them through IE before sending them to the printer when the users asks for them to be print out. Gnome and kde however do not, they recognize the file type when they create the thumbnail, but send the files to the printer as plain-text. I think using gnome-web-photo also has some issues, as it doens't read the printer settings from the default browser, and thus leaves the user in the dark on how to change the printer settings if gnome-web-photo is going to be used as the printer for html files. -- gnome-web-photo integration as html printer https://launchpad.net/bugs/80967 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80966] gnome-web-photo integration as thumbnailer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I'd like to have gnome-web-photo integrated with nautilus as a thumbnailer for .html files, KDE does this trough kdewebphoto, and as far as i can see nothing really prohibits gnome-web-photo to be integrated with the nautilus to do the same for gnome. gnome-web-photo has a thumbnail mode, and takes an input and output file name. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- gnome-web-photo integration as thumbnailer https://launchpad.net/bugs/80966 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80967] gnome-web-photo integration as html printer
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
I'd like to have gnome-web-photo integrated with nautilus as a printer
for .html files,
gnome-web-photo has a print mode, and takes an input and output file name.
It outputs a .ps file which could be piped to the selected printer i guess.
This should allow the user to drag/drop html files on the printer, or select
print from the context menu for multiple .html files at once.
gnome-web-photo reads its preferences from the
~/.gnome2/gnome-web-photo/prefs.js but it seems to be ignoring a whole bunch of
settings.
Perhaps this should be fixed?
It might even be a good idea to have gnome-web-photo look at the
settings inside the firefox profile instead of a separate file, as this
would give the user an easy to find config screen. (inside firefox), a
symlink to the firefox settings dir would suffice to at least read those
settings.
I'd especially appreciate it if gnome-web-photo would honor the
footer*,header* settings.
I added following user settings to the prefs.js file, based on what my
firefox profile had.
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_bgcolor, false);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_bgimages, false);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_colorspace, default);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_command, lpr
${MOZ_PRINTER_NAME:+'-P'}${MOZ_PRINTER_NAME});
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_downloadfonts, true);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_evenpages, true);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_footercenter, );
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_footerleft, );
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_footerright, );
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_headercenter, );
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_headerleft, );
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_headerright, );
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_in_color, true);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_margin_bottom, 0.5);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_margin_left, 0.5);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_margin_right, 0.5);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_margin_top, 0.5);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_oddpages, true);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_orientation, 0);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_pagedelay, 500);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_paper_data, 0);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_paper_height, 10.98);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_paper_name, Letter);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_paper_size, 666);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_paper_size_type, 1);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_paper_size_unit, 0);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_paper_width, 8.46);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_plex_name, default);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_printer,
PostScript/default);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_resolution_name, default);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_reversed, false);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_scaling, 1.00);
user_pref(print.printer_PostScript/default.print_shrink_to_fit, true);
** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
gnome-web-photo integration as html printer
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80967
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80966] Re: gnome-web-photo integration as thumbnailer
If we use gnome-web-photo as a thumbnailer, we should probably add this patch from Suse/Novell to it as well. http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-commit/2006-04/msg00146.html It renices the process. -- gnome-web-photo integration as thumbnailer https://launchpad.net/bugs/80966 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47932] Re: files renamed to be hidden do not get their icon updated on remote FS view
Ok, i did a quick test. Creating a file does what is expected, it creates the file in nautilus with a nice content displaying thumbnail. Renaming it to a hidden file however, does not remove the file from the view, but leaves the file name as it was clickable. An improvement over 5.10 is that it now can be clicked, and nautlius will magically open the hidden file instead of the visible filename. (so the underlying link is being updated) -- files renamed to be hidden do not get their icon updated on remote FS view https://launchpad.net/bugs/47932 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47932] Re: files renamed to be hidden do not get their icon updated on remote FS view
Hmm, i don't recall getting this email. I was using 5.10 at the time, il need to check if it still exists in 6.* Il post back on monday. -- files renamed to be hidden do not get their icon updated on remote FS view https://launchpad.net/bugs/47932 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47256] Re: nautilus crash, blocks gpanel
I figured out how to reproduce this (now on 6.4) Make sure you have quanta installed on a gnome desktop Make sure you have one ftp server listed. Make sure the passwords for the ftp server are listed in both the gnome and kde password managers. Open nautilus. Open the ftp server. (login trough password manager) Double click a file that should open with quanta. Before receiving the kde password dialog, Double click an other file that should open with quanta. If the first quanta has not yet started and authenticated with the server. The kio slave of the following quanta screen blocks (probably, on the password dialog), and in turn blocks the first quata's password dialog. Because the whole quanta startup, and authentication procedure takes quit a while, it's not that hard to trigger this lockup. Killing both quanta's and all kio slaves, daemons etc is the only way to recover. As soon as at least one quanta is running, and authenticated to that server, any number of new files can be opened simultaniously. (since the authentication dialog works different since it has allready authenticated.) -- nautilus crash, blocks gpanel https://launchpad.net/bugs/47256 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57210] search button does not toggle
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus The search button in the nautilus toolbar does not toggle the location bar to become the location bar again. as in: notice the folder buttons in the location bar. Press the search button. Notice you cannot return to the folder button view by clicking search again. The search button should toggle this. (maybe even change its icon) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- search button does not toggle https://launchpad.net/bugs/57210 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 56343] Re: png and jpg thumbnails are different size and border
Here are the problematic images, One is a JPG created by adobe photoshop. (this one does give the thumbnail decoration) The other is a PNG image, created by inkscape, and doesn't receive the thumbnail background. -- png and jpg thumbnails are different size and border https://launchpad.net/bugs/56343 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 56343] Re: png and jpg thumbnails are different size and border
Hi, Im not sure, i will see if i can recreate it in a new folder. And of so, setup the steps. Also il make a screenshot if i cannot find the problem. Both images are 1600x1200 wallpapers both come from within firefox, and both are saved to the dir the are currently in by firefox. anyway, since the problem exists on my office machine, il test it there in about 10 hours. -- png and jpg thumbnails are different size and border https://launchpad.net/bugs/56343 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
