[Bug 1499098] [NEW] guile-1.8 does not install on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS

2015-09-23 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Public bug reported:

guile-1.8 does not install on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS

With a clean installation of Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS that can install other
packages and has all sections enabled, this is the result trying to
install guile-1.8:

sudo apt-get install guile-1.8
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Package guile-1.8 is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source

E: Package 'guile-1.8' has no installation candidate


Other info:
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
Release:12.04

** Affects: guile-1.8 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1499098

Title:
  guile-1.8 does not install on Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/guile-1.8/+bug/1499098/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1199588] [NEW] Software Update disappears and never reappears

2013-07-09 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Public bug reported:

Software Update disappears and never reappears when installing Ubuntu
13.04 64-bit.

Steps to reproduce:

1) Install Ubuntu 13.04 64-bit.
2) Log in.
3) Click to allow system to update to latest software released since 13.04 was 
released.  In my case, 185 megabytes to download.
4) Suddenly the window disappears and does not come back.  It doesn't appear in 
the navigation bar on the left, either.
5) System load and network activity returns to idle.
6) Nothing happens.  I have to update using Terminal and apt-get, instead.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199588

Title:
  Software Update disappears and never reappears

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1199588/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 773836] [NEW] package tzdata 2011g-0ubuntu0.11.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128

2011-04-29 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: tzdata

Installed in VirtualBox VM.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: tzdata 2011g-0ubuntu0.11.04
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Apr 30 00:28:47 2011
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 128
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: tzdata
Title: package tzdata 2011g-0ubuntu0.11.04 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: tzdata (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773836

Title:
  package tzdata 2011g-0ubuntu0.11.04 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 128

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 773836] Re: package tzdata 2011g-0ubuntu0.11.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128

2011-04-29 Thread Kriston Rehberg
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773836

Title:
  package tzdata 2011g-0ubuntu0.11.04 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 128

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 353126] Re: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org

2010-08-05 Thread Kriston Rehberg
I do not have any idea what you are talking about.
I reported a bug.
I hope this does not mean you are marking the whole bug invalid, and
therefore the bug is quietly ignored.

Kris

On Thu, August 5, 2010 2:13 pm, Steve Stalcup wrote:
 This should be a Stable Release Update and not a Backport.

 Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates for information
 on how to request an SRU

 ** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Confirmed = Invalid

 --
 Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI
 fglrx driver using X.org
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of a duplicate bug.




-- 
Kriston Rehberg
http://kriston.net/

-- 
Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx 
driver using X.org
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 353126] Re: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org

2010-05-22 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Speaking of all this great news, does Compiz automatically turn itself
off and get out of the way of games like Aero does in Windows 7?


On Sat, May 22, 2010 8:39 pm, Rocko wrote:
 It works in lucid64, and I find that 3d performance is nicely improved
 in wine apps. But the PC with the nvidia card now sends *both* my
 monitors to vinagre's window, which makes vinagre continually become
 unresponsive and grey out unless I turn on compression and scaling (and
 this is just over the local network).

 --
 Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI
 fglrx driver using X.org
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of a duplicate bug.




-- 
Kriston Rehberg
http://kriston.net/

-- 
Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx 
driver using X.org
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575173] [NEW] Remote desktop does not work when compiz is enabled

2010-05-04 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Public bug reported:

Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Release:10.04

Enable Compiz animations and also enable Remote Desktop.
Try to visit your machine from any platform that can run VNCviewer.
The screen appears but does not ever update its contents.  The mouse and 
keyboard work but the display does not.

Log out, then go to your Ubuntu machine and disable visual effects.
Try to visit your machine from any platform that can run VNCviewer.  It works.

I cannot say whether this is a Compiz problem or a Remote Desktop
problem.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: compiz vnc

-- 
Remote desktop does not work when compiz is enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575173
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations

2009-11-13 Thread Kriston Rehberg
I noticed it still existed, too.
The solution might be enhanced to offer the feature for a panel element
to stick to right side or stick to left side so they are always
aligned to the left or right side without any sort of manual movement
whenever people resize the display.

Kriston

-- 
Kriston Rehberg
http://kriston.net/



TraceyC wrote:
 FYI, the bug still exists in Karmic 9.10 Gnome panel 2.28.0. It happens
 when I have the panel non-maximized, in the upper middle part of the
 screen. The application  Notification Area will move around at boot up
 or when waking up from hibernation. The handle on the Notification Area
 doesn't allow me to move it at all, and it's not locked. In order to
 move it, I have to expand the panel, move the Notification Area and
 unexpand it.

 David, thanks for working on the patch.

 --
 GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session
 start in some situations
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of a duplicate bug.

 Status in Desktop panel for GNOME: Confirmed
 Status in One Hundred Paper Cuts: In Progress
 Status in “gnome-panel” package in Ubuntu: Triaged
 Status in “gnome-panel” source package in Hardy: Triaged

 Bug description:
 I have noticed for a while now that the above-mentioned phenomenon
 occurs when I, say, return from a shut-down. However, the strange thing
 is that it only happens on some occations. I don't really know what the
 problem is, so I can't, unfortunately, post more information.





-- 
GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in 
some situations
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 48671] Re: Cannot rename by clicking on a file

2009-06-16 Thread Kriston Rehberg
This is the single most annoying feature of Nautilus.

Are all these bugs going to have take it upstream as their resolution?

-- 
Cannot rename by clicking on a file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48671
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 22007] Re: no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver

2009-06-16 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Most screen savers have options to make them more appealing, better
functioning, or even to get them to function at all (like picture
slideshows on non-English systems).  It's incomprehensible that we
cannot access these options from the Screensaver applet with a little
Settings button like KDE and most other desktops.

-- 
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 25840] Re: RFE: defer font cache regeneration until last font package

2009-06-16 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Ubuntu Netbook Remix is negatively affected on devices with slow
storage, like Acer Aspire One.  The repeated, unnecessary fc-cache
regeneration on this device causes it to take 60 minutes to install 20
fonts at once.

-- 
RFE: defer font cache regeneration until last font package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25840
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 25840] Re: RFE: defer font cache regeneration until last font package

2008-12-28 Thread Kriston Rehberg
This bug is extremely important.
Every single package that involves Defoma or installs a font does a fc-cache 
regeneration when the package is installed.
Just like ldconfig defers its update until all is completed, please figure out 
a way to defer fc-cache updates until all is completed.

-- 
RFE: defer font cache regeneration until last font package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25840
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 103627] Re: ex-Warty, Feisty installation's font settings are wrong

2008-12-05 Thread Kriston Rehberg
I just prodded some people and, after a few indignant comments at
FreeType, DejaVu, and the people on the Fedora project, they found the
source of the Latin ligatures problem and provided a fix for the
FreeType library at the following link.  This is specific to Latin
ligatures.  You might want to investigate where else ligatures aren't
being rendered properly by the autohinter:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561

-- 
ex-Warty, Feisty installation's font settings are wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103627
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 103627] Re: ex-Warty, Feisty installation's font settings are wrong

2008-12-05 Thread Kriston Rehberg
** Also affects: fontconfig via
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368561
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Changed in: fontconfig
   Importance: Unknown = Undecided
 Bugwatch: Red Hat Bugzilla #368561 = None
   Status: Unknown = New

** Bug watch added: Non-GNU Savannah Bug Tracker #21190
   http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?21190

** Also affects: freetype via
   http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?21190
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Changed in: freetype
   Importance: Unknown = Undecided
 Bugwatch: Non-GNU Savannah Bug Tracker #21190 = None
   Status: Unknown = New

-- 
ex-Warty, Feisty installation's font settings are wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103627
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 236181] Re: slocate does not run if mlocate is installed

2008-07-29 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Ok, so more simply put, the slocate is deprecated.
That's all I needed to hear.

-- 
slocate does not run if mlocate is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236181
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 236181] Re: slocate does not run if mlocate is installed

2008-07-28 Thread Kriston Rehberg
You are saying that the insecure mlocate supercedes the secure slocate and 
there is no way to enable slocate if mlocate is installed.
Why doesn't the cron.daily script use the alternatives system if a user wants 
to use the secure slocate program?
How is the user to use slocate, then?

-- 
slocate does not run if mlocate is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236181
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 200713] Re: user's ~/.fonts.conf should be made authoritative

2008-07-28 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Mr. Packard responded that changing the order of the files breaks the parsing 
so it will not work, but didn't elaborate why or how.
In any case the order of the files matters but not in the way I was 
thinking--higher numbers do not necessarily supercede lower numbers the way 
the parsing works.

Since upstream says it's not a bug, I guess it's not a bug.

 .



** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
user's ~/.fonts.conf should be made authoritative
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 236181] Re: slocate does not run if mlocate is installed

2008-07-28 Thread Kriston Rehberg
From the package description mlocate uses the alternatives system
 Installing mlocate will change the /usr/bin/locate binary to point to
 mlocate via the alternatives mechanism
 I haven't checked but if it is not the case then this is a bug and you
 should fill a report about it.

This *is* that bug report.  The problem is in /etc/cron.daily.  The
slocate script disregards the alternatives system entirely and does not
run if mlocate is present.

-- 
slocate does not run if mlocate is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236181
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 180619] Re: Xorg module VNC cores on keyboard input

2008-06-02 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Be advised that Debian bug 444697 fixes this bug by REMOVING libvnc.so.
And I quote:
Removed libvnc.so that do not work with recent xorg. This is a workaround but 
solves the grave fault, closes: #444697. No longer provides x0vnc-server.

This tacitly suggests that Xorg does not support libvnc.so at this time.
In any case bug 444697 does not solve the problem.
Debian merely removed the feature that fails and closes the bug.  It is 
terribly irresponsible to close the bug after removing the feature that causes 
the bug from a project management standpoint--the non-working libvnc.so is now 
orphaned and completely untracked (there is no bug I can find that tracks 
non-working libvnc.so).  The closing of this bug implies it to be fixed when it 
was not.

For what it's worth, the vino remote desktop feature now built-in to
the GNOME desktop is worthless to remote users because it only works if
the user is already logged in.  This is very unfortunately for those of
us who rely on libvnc:  if you're logged out you cannot log in
remotely!!  The workaround is a horribly security deficient automatic
login prompt bypass using gdm or kdm.

Too bad.

-- 
Xorg module VNC cores on keyboard input
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180619
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 236181] [NEW] slocate does not run if mlocate is installed

2008-05-30 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: slocate

When slocate is installed it puts a crontab entry into /etc/cron.daily/slocate.
This script does a check to see if /usr/bin/mlocate is available and does not 
run if that file is found.
The problem is that both slocate and mlocate may be installed concurrently, and 
the user may choose either mlocate or slocate using the update-alternatives(8) 
subsystem.

The /etc/cron.daily/slocate crontab script needs to be changed to disregard 
whether mlocate is installed.
The slocate and mlocate systems need to become aware of the 
update-alternatives(8) subsystem and act according to that setting.

** Affects: mlocate (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: slocate (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: mlocate (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
slocate does not run if mlocate is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236181
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 236181] Re: slocate does not run if mlocate is installed

2008-05-30 Thread Kriston Rehberg
This is a potential security issue since slocate is the reputed secure
version of locate.  When the user believes he or she is using the
secure locate after installing the slocate package, in reality they
are still using mlocate due to this bug.

This bug also affects package named mlocate.

The packages either need to co-exist using update-alternatives(8)
subsystem or must mutually exclude each other upon package installation.

Even if a user intends to use slocate it will never run unless mlocate
is removed.

-- 
slocate does not run if mlocate is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236181
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 236183] [NEW] localepurge cannot be made to work outside /usr/share/locale

2008-05-30 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: localepurge

The localepurge command cannot be made to work outside /usr/share/locale.
While it is useful for cleaning /usr/share/locale it needs to be configurable 
to other locations such as /usr/local/share.  The location appears to be 
hard-coded into the command and cannot be changed and used in other locations.

** Affects: localepurge (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
localepurge cannot be made to work outside /usr/share/locale
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 115011] Re: Ubuntu 7.04 hangs on reboot on Dell 745

2008-05-30 Thread Kriston Rehberg
This bug remains in the generic kernel-2.6.24-17 on Ubuntu Hardy (8.04).
The machine hangs at the point at which the kernel outputs the message 
Restarting.


** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
 Ubuntu 7.04 hangs on reboot on Dell 745
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 217079] Re: Hardy Heron won't shut down or restart

2008-04-28 Thread Kriston Rehberg
What is strange is that when I disable the boot splash (editing 
/boot/grub/menu.lst and removing quiet and splash) the system shuts down 
properly.
It appears to be a problem with the boot splash screen and possibly my Radeon 
card.

Furthermore, if using the live CD, the USB keyboard is disabled before
you can press enter as the screen asks you to.  The system has to be
rebooted with the reset button or by holding the power button for 4
seconds.

-- 
Hardy Heron won't shut down or restart
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217079
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 200707] Re: fontconfig does not honor hintslight, hintmedium, hintfull

2008-04-06 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Mingming, thanks for the comments.
I suspect that the user's settings in fontconfig are not being honored
when an application asserts a setting.  This needs to be addressed.
It indeed might be a libcairo thing.
There is still alot of work going on in the new rendering pipeline so
perhaps when the dust clears, so to speak, this issue will be resolved
and there will be a new place where this kind of setting is supposed
to be asserted.


Mingming wrote:
 Could this be a bug of libcairo? Because after comment one line of code
 in libcairo, the hintstyle sets in ~/.fonts.conf makes effect. I
 reported it to libcairo, Bug #209256, but got no response.

 I'd like to render my fonts in different hintstyles.

 To be precise, I have chinese font and western language fonts. For the
 chinese font, I'd like it to be rendered in hintfull, but for other
 fonts, I'd prefer hintslight.

 Ok, I configured in the fontconfig file, but it didn't make any change.
 All the fonts are in the same hintstyle, depending on the configuration
 in gnome-appearance-properties.

 I googled for quite a long time and finally I got one solution.

 In the file cairo-ft-font.c, in function _cairo_ft_options_merge, just
 comment the following line:

 // if (options-base.hint_style == CAIRO_HINT_STYLE_DEFAULT)

 and recompile, now everything works fine. The fonts are rendered
 according to the hintstyles configured in fontconfig.

 I don't know if this is really a bug of libcairo. If I'm wrong, please
 accept my apology.

 --
 fontconfig does not honor hintslight, hintmedium, hintfull
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200707
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in Source Package fontconfig in Ubuntu: New

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: fontconfig

 fontconfig-2.4.2-1.2ubuntu4 does not honor hintslight, hintmedium,
 hintfull options for the autohinter.
 When I ask fontconfig to use the authinter and specify hintstyle as
 hintslight, hintmedium, or hintfull there is no perceptible difference
 on the screen.  Doing this on a similar Fedora 8 system shows
 perceptible differences with all settings.
 I also tried downloading and compiling freetype2 with the bytecode
 interpreter forced off so the autohinter is always used.  The font
 rendering is certainly the autohinter but there is again no perceptible
 difference between hintslight, hintmedium, and hintfull.
 I suspect but cannot prove that this might be the result of the
 fontconfig hack that was made to enable/disable the legacy LCD filter
 for monospaced fonts in gutsy.

 Ubuntu 7.10 (gutsy)



-- 
fontconfig does not honor hintslight, hintmedium, hintfull
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200707
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 200713] Re: user's ~/.fonts.conf should be made authoritative

2008-03-12 Thread Kriston Rehberg
I'm discussing this with keithp at the moment.  He indicates that the
order of the files is not significant but I'm asking him for more
information on how that could be true, and if it is, how ~/.fonts.conf
is truly authoritative.


Arne Goetje wrote:
From /etc/fonts/conf.avail/README:

 The files are loaded in numeric order, the structure of the
 configuration
 has led to the following conventions in usage:

  Files begining with:   Contain:

  00 through 09  Font directories
  10 through 19  system rendering defaults (AA, etc)
  20 through 29  font rendering options
  30 through 39  family substitution
  40 through 49  generic identification, map family-generic
  50 through 59  alternate config file loading
  60 through 69  generic aliases, map generic-family
  70 through 79  select font (adjust which fonts are available)
  80 through 89  match target=scan (modify scanned patterns)
  90 through 99  font synthesis

 While I agree with you that the range 50~59 should probably be 90~99, I
 think this issue should be taken to upstream.
 Can you please file a bug to upstream and link it here?

 Thanks

 --
 user's ~/.fonts.conf should be made authoritative
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200713
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in Source Package fontconfig in Ubuntu: New

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: fontconfig

 Two issues in fontconfig 50-user.conf and 51-local.conf.
 In /etc/fonts/conf.d there is a file named 50-user.conf that loads the
 user's own ~/.fonts.conf file.
 There is also 51-local.conf that is supposed to load local configuration
 elements.

 The directives in these two files are overridden by up to 14 more
 root-owned imutable configuration files, most of which are
 user-impacting, therefore the user as well as the site adminsitrator are
 both left without the ability to make some important font choices.

 The /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf and
 /etc/fonts/conf.avail/50-user.conf should be moved to the last possible
 location, such as 98-user.conf and 99-user.conf so the user and the site
 administrator both have the opportunity to override any configuration
 element in fontconfig without becoming root and adjusting
 /etc/fonts/conf.d directly.

 I have tested this to be true in Ubuntu 7.10 gutsy.

 This also serious affects KDE which uses ~/.fonts.conf exclusively for
 font configuration (GNOME uses gconf instead and the problems are
 somewhat avoidable in GNOME).



-- 
user's ~/.fonts.conf should be made authoritative
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 200707] Re: fontconfig does not honor hintslight, hintmedium, hintfull

2008-03-11 Thread Kriston Rehberg
The problem is not with the LCD filter, it's whether the Ubuntu copy of
freetype is changing the autohint style.  When choosing each of the four
options the fonts change their shapes.  In Ubuntu, only the none and
full make any hinting difference.  Someone in gutsy changed the
medium and full buttons to do nothing more than turn on and off the
monospace lcd filter.  This needs to be fixed so that the buttons do
what they say.

-- 
Kriston Rehberg
http://kriston.net/



Arne Goetje wrote:
 Can you try to remove /etc/fonts/conf.d/53-monospace-lcd-filter.conf and
 see if that helps?

 If that helps, then we would need some discussion if we should disable
 that file by default.

 As a general note: due to the nature of fontconfig being a system wide
 setting and users will always have different preferences when it comes
 to text rendering, it is actually impossible for us to provide a default
 configuration that works for everyone. Manual tweaking by the user will
 aways be needed.

 --
 fontconfig does not honor hintslight, hintmedium, hintfull
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200707
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in Source Package fontconfig in Ubuntu: New

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: fontconfig

 fontconfig-2.4.2-1.2ubuntu4 does not honor hintslight, hintmedium,
 hintfull options for the autohinter.
 When I ask fontconfig to use the authinter and specify hintstyle as
 hintslight, hintmedium, or hintfull there is no perceptible difference
 on the screen.  Doing this on a similar Fedora 8 system shows
 perceptible differences with all settings.
 I also tried downloading and compiling freetype2 with the bytecode
 interpreter forced off so the autohinter is always used.  The font
 rendering is certainly the autohinter but there is again no perceptible
 difference between hintslight, hintmedium, and hintfull.
 I suspect but cannot prove that this might be the result of the
 fontconfig hack that was made to enable/disable the legacy LCD filter
 for monospaced fonts in gutsy.

 Ubuntu 7.10 (gutsy)



-- 
fontconfig does not honor hintslight, hintmedium, hintfull
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200707
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 200707] Re: fontconfig does not honor hintslight, hintmedium, hintfull

2008-03-11 Thread Kriston Rehberg
The problem is not with the LCD filter, it's whether the Ubuntu copy of
freetype is changing the autohint style.  When choosing each of the four
options the fonts normally change their shapes in obvious ways.  In
Ubuntu gutsy, only the none and full buttons make any difference.
Someone in gutsy changed the medium and full buttons to do nothing
more than turn on and off the monospace lcd filter to keep things
simple, but this appears to break the autohinting configuration.  This
could be due to the fact that Ubuntu normally ships with the autohinter
disabled.  In any case this needs to be fixed so that the buttons do
what they say, that is, adjust autohinter hint styles.

In addition, manually editting ~/.fonts.conf to use the various hint
styles does not seem to make any difference so this is therefore a
problem with Ubuntu's fontconfig patches.

-- 
fontconfig does not honor hintslight, hintmedium, hintfull
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200707
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 200707] [NEW] fontconfig does not honor hintslight, hintmedium, hintfull

2008-03-10 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: fontconfig

fontconfig-2.4.2-1.2ubuntu4 does not honor hintslight, hintmedium, hintfull 
options for the autohinter.
When I ask fontconfig to use the authinter and specify hintstyle as hintslight, 
hintmedium, or hintfull there is no perceptible difference on the screen.  
Doing this on a similar Fedora 8 system shows perceptible differences with all 
settings.
I also tried downloading and compiling freetype2 with the bytecode interpreter 
forced off so the autohinter is always used.  The font rendering is certainly 
the autohinter but there is again no perceptible difference between hintslight, 
hintmedium, and hintfull.
I suspect but cannot prove that this might be the result of the fontconfig 
hack that was made to enable/disable the legacy LCD filter for monospaced 
fonts in gutsy.

Ubuntu 7.10 (gutsy)

** Affects: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
fontconfig does not honor hintslight, hintmedium, hintfull
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200707
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 200713] [NEW] user's ~/.fonts.conf should be made authoritative

2008-03-10 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: fontconfig

Two issues in fontconfig 50-user.conf and 51-local.conf.
In /etc/fonts/conf.d there is a file named 50-user.conf that loads the user's 
own ~/.fonts.conf file.
There is also 51-local.conf that is supposed to load local configuration 
elements.

The directives in these two files are overridden by up to 14 more root-
owned imutable configuration files, most of which are user-impacting,
therefore the user as well as the site adminsitrator are both left
without the ability to make some important font choices.

The /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf and
/etc/fonts/conf.avail/50-user.conf should be moved to the last possible
location, such as 98-user.conf and 99-user.conf so the user and the site
administrator both have the opportunity to override any configuration
element in fontconfig without becoming root and adjusting
/etc/fonts/conf.d directly.

I have tested this to be true in Ubuntu 7.10 gutsy.

This also serious affects KDE which uses ~/.fonts.conf exclusively for
font configuration (GNOME uses gconf instead and the problems are
somewhat avoidable in GNOME).

** Affects: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
user's ~/.fonts.conf should be made authoritative
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 200713] Re: user's ~/.fonts.conf should be made authoritative

2008-03-10 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Errata:
The /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf and /etc/fonts/conf.avail/50-user.conf 
should be moved to the last possible location, such as 98-local.conf and 
99-user.conf so the user and the site administrator both have the opportunity 
to override any configuration element in fontconfig without becoming root and 
adjusting /etc/fonts/conf.d directly.

-- 
user's ~/.fonts.conf should be made authoritative
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 14310] Re: fontconfig don't use autohinter as default

2008-03-10 Thread Kriston Rehberg
Per the Freetype.org developers the bytecode interpreter is not to be used by 
any distribution because of the TrueType patents held by Microsoft and Apple.
Mr. Shuttleworth's blog does not address the patent issues on the bytecode 
interpreter.
Does Ubuntu pay for the license for all the users of the Ubuntu distribution?  
We need to see that in writing.
If it's not licensed then the use of the bytecode interpreter must be disabled 
in Ubuntu at compilation time.

Has this not become a top issue for Ubuntu already?

-- 
fontconfig don't use autohinter as default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14310
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 33901] Re: it does not appear to be possible to disable synthetic emboldening

2008-03-10 Thread Kriston Rehberg
See Bug #200713 which proposes a fix to the font configuration file
order problem.

-- 
it does not appear to be possible to disable synthetic emboldening
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33901
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 110392] Re: The yes-bitmaps rule makes it impossible to disable any bitmap font on a per-user basis

2008-03-10 Thread Kriston Rehberg
See Bug #200713 which proposes a fix to the font configuration file
order problem.

-- 
The yes-bitmaps rule makes it impossible to disable any bitmap font on a 
per-user basis
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs