[Bug 2080940] Re: unattended-upgrades broken by python-upgrade
** Bug watch added: github.com/python/cpython/issues #124170 https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/124170 ** Also affects: python via https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/124170 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1079780 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079780 ** Also affects: python3.10 (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079780 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Package changed: python3.10 (Debian) => unattended-upgrades (Debian) ** Package changed: unattended-upgrades (Debian) => python3.12 (Debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080940 Title: unattended-upgrades broken by python-upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python/+bug/2080940/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057693] Re: Activating autotrim results in high load average due to uninterruptible threads
Any news on this? I did a release upgrade to Noble and have the exact same problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057693 Title: Activating autotrim results in high load average due to uninterruptible threads To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zfs/+bug/2057693/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080341] [NEW] package linux-headers-generic 6.8.0-44.44 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré
Public bug reported: Kubuntu 22.04 to 24.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: linux-headers-generic 6.8.0-44.44 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-41.41-generic 6.8.12 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-41-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 AptOrdering: libunbound8:amd64: Install NULL: ConfigurePending Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/seq:jean-marc 1729 F pipewire /dev/snd/controlC0: jean-marc 1733 F wireplumber CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown Date: Wed Sep 11 09:39:36 2024 ErrorMessage: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-06-25 (809 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.4 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20220223) MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP ProBook 4540s ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-41-generic root=UUID=6265d3a1-c9be-4610-b129-1e89e575c66b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.12, Python 3.12.3, python3-minimal, 3.12.3-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: grub-pc 2.12-1ubuntu7 SourcePackage: linux Title: package linux-headers-generic 6.8.0-44.44 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-09-05 (5 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 04/11/2019 dmi.bios.release: 15.104 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: 68IRR Ver. F.68 dmi.board.name: 17F6 dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: KBC Version 58.21 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.ec.firmware.release: 88.33 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr68IRRVer.F.68:bd04/11/2019:br15.104:efr88.33:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPProBook4540s:pvrA1019D1103:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn17F6:rvrKBCVersion58.21:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvr:skuC5E25EA#ABF: dmi.product.family: 103C_5336AN G=N L=BUS B=HP S=PRO dmi.product.name: HP ProBook 4540s dmi.product.sku: C5E25EA#ABF dmi.product.version: A1019D1103 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard mtime.conffile..etc.init.d.apport: 2024-07-22T16:59:07 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080341 Title: package linux-headers-generic 6.8.0-44.44 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2080341/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 2079866] Re: grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04
/etc/cloud/build.info contains:
build_name: server
serial: 20221104
Op di 10 sep 2024 om 15:10 schreef Mate Kukri <2079...@bugs.launchpad.net>:
> Hmm it seems like `grub-{ef,pc}/cloud_style_installation: true` is wrong
> for this set up.
>
> Seems like the upgrader thinks this installation was deployed from a
> cloud image.
>
> Does `/etc/cloud/build.info` exist on your system? What does it say?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079866
>
> Title:
> grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2079866/+subscriptions
>
>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079866
Title:
grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2079866/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079866] Re: grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04
Sure, That gives the next output: ``` (base) ubuntu@server2:~$ sudo debconf-show grub-pc grub-efi/install_devices_failed: false * grub2/update_nvram: false grub-efi/partition_description: grub-efi/install_devices: grub-efi/install_devices_empty: false grub-pc/postrm_purge_boot_grub: false grub-pc/timeout: 0 grub2/linux_cmdline: nomodeset iommu=pt grub2/unsigned_kernels_title: grub2/unsigned_kernels: grub-pc/install_devices_empty: false grub-pc/disk_description: grub-pc/install_devices_failed_upgrade: true grub-pc/partition_description: grub2/kfreebsd_cmdline: grub2/linux_cmdline_default: * grub-efi/cloud_style_installation: true grub2/kfreebsd_cmdline_default: quiet splash * grub-pc/install_devices: /dev/disk/by-id/ata-HGST_HUS724020ALA640_PN2134P6HWDG2X, /dev/disk/by-id/ata-HGST_HUS724020ALA640_PN2134P6JN66YP, /dev/disk/by-id/ata-HGST_HUS726020ALA610_K5J1YSTA grub-pc/install_devices_disks_changed: grub-pc/chainload_from_menu.lst: true grub-pc/kopt_extracted: false grub-pc/hidden_timeout: true grub2/enable_os_prober: false * grub-pc/cloud_style_installation: true grub2/no_efi_extra_removable: false grub-pc/mixed_legacy_and_grub2: true grub-efi/install_devices_disks_changed: grub-pc/install_devices_failed: false ``` -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079866 Title: grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2079866/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 2079866] Re: grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04
lsblk gives: sda 8:00 1.8T 0 disk ├─sda18:10 1G 0 part │ └─md1 9:10 1022M 0 raid1 /boot ├─sda28:20 1.8T 0 part │ └─md2 9:20 1.8T 0 raid1 / ├─sda38:30 512M 0 part [SWAP] ├─sda48:40 1K 0 part └─sda58:50 1.9M 0 part sdb 8:16 0 1.8T 0 disk ├─sdb18:17 0 1G 0 part │ └─md1 9:10 1022M 0 raid1 /boot ├─sdb28:18 0 1.8T 0 part │ └─md2 9:20 1.8T 0 raid1 / └─sdb38:19 0 512M 0 part [SWAP] sdc 8:32 1 1.8T 0 disk ├─sdc18:33 1 1G 0 part │ └─md1 9:10 1022M 0 raid1 /boot ├─sdc28:34 1 1.8T 0 part │ └─md2 9:20 1.8T 0 raid1 / └─sdc38:35 1 512M 0 part [SWAP] I do not know anymore have it was installed a few years ago. Op ma 9 sep 2024 om 10:25 schreef Mate Kukri <2079...@bugs.launchpad.net>: > This seems to look like a cloud image installation which enable a new > feature in GRUB on upgrades. > > What disk configuration is this deployed on and how was it installed? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079866 > > Title: > grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04 > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2079866/+subscriptions > > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079866 Title: grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2079866/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079866] [NEW] grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04
Public bug reported: During upgrade to 24.04 and afterwards when executing "apt upgrade" I get the following error: Setting up grub-pc (2.12-1ubuntu7) ... Installing for i386-pc platform. mdadm: /dev/md does not appear to be an md device grub-install: error: ioctl RAID_VERSION error: Inappropriate ioctl for device. dpkg: error processing package grub-pc (--configure): installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: grub-pc E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) The system does function normally, but I can not finish the upgrade. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: grub-pc 2.12-1ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: User Name 6.8.0-41.41-generic 6.8.12 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-41-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CloudArchitecture: x86_64 CloudBuildName: server CloudID: configdrive CloudName: configdrive CloudPlatform: configdrive CloudSerial: 20221104 CloudSubPlatform: config-disk (/dev/sda5) Date: Fri Sep 6 21:28:09 2024 ProcEnviron: LANG=C.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: grub2 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-08-30 (8 days ago) mtime.conffile..etc.init.d.apport: 2024-07-22T14:59:07 ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug cloud-image noble ** Summary changed: - grub-pc configure fails during upgrade van 22.04 to 24.04 + grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079866 Title: grub-pc configure fails during upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2079866/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1861609] Re: Xorg crashed with assertion failure (usually in a VM) at [privates.h:121/122: dixGetPrivateAddr: Assertion `key->initialized' failed]
Thanks for the explanation and your help! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861609 Title: Xorg crashed with assertion failure (usually in a VM) at [privates.h:121/122: dixGetPrivateAddr: Assertion `key->initialized' failed] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/1861609/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064846] Re: xfce4-panel should be upgraded to 4.18.6 if glib 2.80 is used
Thank you! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064846 Title: xfce4-panel should be upgraded to 4.18.6 if glib 2.80 is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/2064846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054919] Re: xfce4-panel crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message_expr()
I absolutely agree with Hans. Any updates on the situation? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054919 Title: xfce4-panel crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message_expr() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/2054919/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1861609] Re: Xorg crashed with assertion failure (usually in a VM) at [privates.h:121/122: dixGetPrivateAddr: Assertion `key->initialized' failed]
FYI: I have the some problem as Doug mentioned (fresh install of Xubuntu 24.04, although it's the .1 release), but I do not have deep technical knowledge, so I don't think I'd be able to implement any kind of workaround. Does anybody know if and when the problem will be fixed (and if I can just use the normal system update mechanisms to get a fix)? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861609 Title: Xorg crashed with assertion failure (usually in a VM) at [privates.h:121/122: dixGetPrivateAddr: Assertion `key->initialized' failed] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/1861609/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064846] Re: xfce4-panel should be upgraded to 4.18.6 if glib 2.80 is used
I also agree. For the non tech-savvy of us: How would the workaround mentioned above work? How do I actually upgrade to 4.18.6? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064846 Title: xfce4-panel should be upgraded to 4.18.6 if glib 2.80 is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/2064846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075145] Re: exfatprogs CVE-2023-45897 backport to jammy
Update has been published now, thanks for testing! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075145 Title: exfatprogs CVE-2023-45897 backport to jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exfatprogs/+bug/2075145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075145] Re: exfatprogs CVE-2023-45897 backport to jammy
Thanks for the debdiff for this issue. I've validated that that is the only commit that affects jammy. I have uploaded this package for building in the security team PPA here: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security- proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages Once the package has finished building, could you please test it and comment back in this bug. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075145 Title: exfatprogs CVE-2023-45897 backport to jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exfatprogs/+bug/2075145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051574] Re: gnome-shell-portal-helper crashed with SIGTRAP in waitUntilSyncedOrDie() from WebKit::XDGDBusProxy::launch() ["bwrap: setting up uid map: Permission denied" ; "Failed to fully launch
I'll let someone else decide if this bug is still worth fixing even though we aren't using the helper anymore. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051574 Title: gnome-shell-portal-helper crashed with SIGTRAP in waitUntilSyncedOrDie() from WebKit::XDGDBusProxy::launch() ["bwrap: setting up uid map: Permission denied" ; "Failed to fully launch dbus- proxy: Child process exited with code 1"] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2051574/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051574] Re: gnome-shell-portal-helper crashed with SIGTRAP in waitUntilSyncedOrDie() from WebKit::XDGDBusProxy::launch() ["bwrap: setting up uid map: Permission denied" ; "Failed to fully launch
Ah yes, this should be fixed now because of the security update. I meant to update this bug, but forgot. Thanks for noticing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051574 Title: gnome-shell-portal-helper crashed with SIGTRAP in waitUntilSyncedOrDie() from WebKit::XDGDBusProxy::launch() ["bwrap: setting up uid map: Permission denied" ; "Failed to fully launch dbus- proxy: Child process exited with code 1"] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2051574/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2077001] Re: Clipboard contents available at locked screen
Thanks! ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077001 Title: Clipboard contents available at locked screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2077001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076130] Re: CVE-2024-6472
Thanks Rico! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076130 Title: CVE-2024-6472 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2076130/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076130] Re: CVE-2024-6472
Hi Rico, the debdiff in comment #1 contains a patch that doesn't actually apply to jammy. Could you please fix it? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076130 Title: CVE-2024-6472 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2076130/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076130] Re: CVE-2024-6472
Thanks for preparing these Rico, I'll prepare the security updates! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076130 Title: CVE-2024-6472 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2076130/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1967245] Re: 'net usershare' returned error 255 on jammy-desktop-amd64
** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) ** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967245 Title: 'net usershare' returned error 255 on jammy-desktop-amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-share/+bug/1967245/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1833281]
(In reply to Steven Haigh from comment #74) > These days, its become cheap enough to just have more RAM - so to be honest, > I haven't seen an issue like this again in a number of years - but now I > don't bother with less than 32Gb of RAM for a desktop. > > Likely, this has just become obsolete now - so closing as such. Sorry to object, but I'm reading this thread because the issue is still fresh enough and relevant to me. Some people are stuck with 4Gb to live everyday. However (In reply to Konstantin Kharlamov from comment #75) This is helpful, like others above, the issue did not show up badly in the last few month using Mint 21.3 and kernel 6.8 (and perhaps since 5.15 or 5.19). I can not easily revert to an older one just for the test, but the machine currently reports `/sys/kernel/mm/lru_gen/enabled` and its value is `0x0007` as suggested. This later is fair enough to mandate closure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833281 Title: System freeze when memory is put on SWAP in Linux >4.10.x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1833281/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075542] Re: bind9 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 breakes local system
Unfortunately, we did not have access to the simplified patches for 9.16 when the security issues were published, and since 9.16 is no longer supported by ISC since April 2024, we weren't expecting them to become available. The patches for 9.18 were much more sophisticated rendering backporting to 9.16 unpractical. The patches that ISC eventually created for 9.16 and used by them to fix the Debian package use a different approach. In the interest of keeping our customers secure, we made the difficult decision at the time of moving to 9.18, even though certain changes would require adjustments for some users. We mentioned this update would require changes in our USN, and linked to an ISC page describing the changes required when migrating from 9.16 to 9.18. We apologize for situations like these, and we always strive to release updates that do not break existing installations. Previous versions of packages can always be downloaded from launchpad by going to the package page (for bind9, that would be https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9 ), clicking the "View full publishing history" on the right, clicking the version we want, clicking the architecture we want, and a list of downloadable binaries will be displayed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075542 Title: bind9 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 breakes local system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/2075542/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074837] Re: bind9 crashes after an update to 9.18 version
I don't believe Ubuntu 20.04 shipped with a dnssec-enable directive. Could you perhaps have upgraded from a previous release, or kept an old configuration file? Did you get warnings in your log file about the deprecated directive? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074837 Title: bind9 crashes after an update to 9.18 version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/2074837/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073942] Re: Fox News Site Not Working
** Package changed: apache2 (Ubuntu) => firefox (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073942 Title: Fox News Site Not Working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2073942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1999814] Re: [SRU] Allow for specifying common baseline CPU model with disabled feature
Unfortunately the nova package in jammy-proposed got superseded by a security update and will have to be re-uploaded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999814 Title: [SRU] Allow for specifying common baseline CPU model with disabled feature To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1999814/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073515] Re: functionality loss in mod_proxy rewritten path
Thanks, that is very helpful, so we're getting an extra slash here: rewrite '/asd.example.com/' -> 'http:///asd:8000/' instead of: rewrite '/asd.example.com/' -> 'http://asd:8000/' and I can confirm this issue exists with upstream's 2.4.62 release too, so I will keep an eye out for new fixes they have been adding post- release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073515 Title: functionality loss in mod_proxy rewritten path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2073515/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073515] Re: functionality loss in mod_proxy rewritten path
I'm having difficulty reproducing your exact issue. Could you please run apache with "rewrite:trace3" and show working and non-working requests from error.log? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073515 Title: functionality loss in mod_proxy rewritten path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2073515/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073515] Re: functionality loss in mod_proxy rewritten path
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073515 Title: functionality loss in mod_proxy rewritten path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2073515/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073515] Re: functionality loss in mod_proxy rewritten path
Thanks for reporting these issues. There are been a few regression fixes upstream following the security updates from their 2.4.60, 2.4.61 and 2.4.62 releases. I will attempt to reproduce your issue and see if it has been fixed upstream yet. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073515 Title: functionality loss in mod_proxy rewritten path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2073515/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1973321] Re: snaps don't start when current working directory is on a remote FS (sshfs, NFS)
Now that both Firefox and also Thunderbird are only delivered as snaps on Ubuntu 24.04, I feel this bug should finally no longer be considered with the importance of a "Wishlist"... With the release of 22.04, Canonical was already advertising an AD integration: https://ubuntu.com/blog/new-active-directory-integration- features-in-ubuntu-22-04-part-1. When more and more applications are effectively removed from Ubuntu, I do not understand how this can be used as advertisement. Yet @ahasenack goes even further and actively advertises this once more, for the now released 24.04: https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/introduction- to-active-directory-integration How would you practically utilize the shared user database from AD, without also having a shared/networked storage for your users? Maybe I'm missing something, if so, please let me know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973321 Title: snaps don't start when current working directory is on a remote FS (sshfs, NFS) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1973321/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1973321] Re: snaps don't start when current working directory is on a remote FS (sshfs, NFS)
** Also affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973321 Title: snaps don't start when current working directory is on a remote FS (sshfs, NFS) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1973321/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069792] Re: lyx segfaults upon opening a .lyx file
Thanks for the example, the bug should be fixed in LyX 2.5.2. Note that the bst file is irrelevant here, the issue was with LyX's own parsing of the bib file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069792 Title: lyx segfaults upon opening a .lyx file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lyx/+bug/2069792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072648] Re: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend
Regression fix USN has now been published: https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6885-2 Thanks! ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072648 Title: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2072648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072648] Re: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend
Awesome, thanks for testing it, I'll prepare updated packages to release ASAP! That's an excellent write-up of what is happening here, and is why I suspected that commit was the cause. ** Also affects: apache2 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apache2 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apache2 (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072648 Title: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2072648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072648] Re: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend
I have uploaded a test package to the security team PPA here: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security- proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages If you could give it a spin and see if it fixes the issue, that would be great. If it does, I'll release it as a regression update. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072648 Title: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2072648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072648] Re: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend
This is a stab in the dark but perhaps this is part of the problem: https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/4d3a308014be26e5407113b4c827a1ea2882bf38 Would you be willing to try a test package if I build one? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072648 Title: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2072648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072648] Re: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072648 Title: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2072648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072648] Re: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend
Is this all your are getting? "Reason: URI has no hostname: /…" Or did you edit that to remove sensitive info? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072648 Title: Regression in Apache 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.10 causes intermittent errors in mod_proxy_http2 backend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2072648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1815278] Re: LyX restores the same cursor position wherever it was placed next time(s)
Thanks for the confirmation Konstantin. I do not have any admin rights to do that, but in my mind this ticket can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815278 Title: LyX restores the same cursor position wherever it was placed next time(s) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lyx/+bug/1815278/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069596] Re: blocks wrong IPv4 and IPv6 addresses on LE systems (reversed byte order)
** Changed in: crowdsec-firewall-bouncer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069596 Title: blocks wrong IPv4 and IPv6 addresses on LE systems (reversed byte order) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crowdsec-firewall-bouncer/+bug/2069596/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068823] Re: gofmt in golang-1.22-go flagged by multiple EDR software
We have no way of knowing why virustotal is flagging this as being malicious, so there is no actionable item we can take with this bug report. Could you get more details on the issue? ** Changed in: golang-1.22 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068823 Title: gofmt in golang-1.22-go flagged by multiple EDR software To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.22/+bug/2068823/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069301] Re: Xorg crash
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find. ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069301 Title: Xorg crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/2069301/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070259]
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is available, members of the security team will review it and publish the package. See the following link for more information: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures ** Tags added: community-security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070259 Title: CVE-2022-30333 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unrar-nonfree/+bug/2070259/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069382] Re: The Gnome graphics session disappears with SSH errors
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find. ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069382 Title: The Gnome graphics session disappears with SSH errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meta-gnome3/+bug/2069382/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069490] Re: Possible fingerjacking vulnerability: CVE-2024-37408
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069490 Title: Possible fingerjacking vulnerability: CVE-2024-37408 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/2069490/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069596]
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is available, members of the security team will review it and publish the package. See the following link for more information: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures ** Tags added: community-security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069596 Title: blocks wrong IPv4 and IPv6 addresses on LE systems (reversed byte order) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crowdsec-firewall-bouncer/+bug/2069596/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070418]
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is available, members of the security team will review it and publish the package. See the following link for more information: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures ** Tags added: community-security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070418 Title: Security vulnerability, arbitrary shell commands can run when turning on org-mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs/+bug/2070418/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071634] Re: [81DE, Realtek ALC236, Mic, Internal] No sound at all
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find. ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071634 Title: [81DE, Realtek ALC236, Mic, Internal] No sound at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/2071634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071614] Re: package libc-bin 2.35-0ubuntu3.8 failed to install/upgrade: installed libc-bin package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 126
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find. ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071614 Title: package libc-bin 2.35-0ubuntu3.8 failed to install/upgrade: installed libc-bin package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 126 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/2071614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071924] Re: package libavahi-ui-gtk3-0 0.7-4ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile subprocess returned error exit status 2
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find. ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public ** Package changed: ubuntu => avahi (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071924 Title: package libavahi-ui-gtk3-0 0.7-4ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile subprocess returned error exit status 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avahi/+bug/2071924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072168] Re: package click 0.5.2-2ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: installed click package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find. ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072168 Title: package click 0.5.2-2ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: installed click package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/click/+bug/2072168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1815278] Re: LyX restores the same cursor position wherever it was placed next time(s)
Hello Konstantin, is this bug still present for you? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815278 Title: LyX restores the same cursor position wherever it was placed next time(s) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lyx/+bug/1815278/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2049926] Re: Problems with hyphenation and long lines
Do you have support for danish hyphenation rule installed? I'd try to install the package texlive-lang-european if it is not there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049926 Title: Problems with hyphenation and long lines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lyx/+bug/2049926/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071777] Re: Unable to ssh to servers in other subnet
Thanks for reporting this issue. It's a pretty odd issue, because all the OpenSSH update did was disable a line that logged something, so I'm not sure how it could be related to connecting from a different subnet. Can you confirm that downgrading to the previous release fixes the issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071777 Title: Unable to ssh to servers in other subnet To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2071777/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069792] Re: lyx segfaults upon opening a .lyx file
Can you share the bibtex file or just the bad entry? The link that you give here does not have the 1000 authors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069792 Title: lyx segfaults upon opening a .lyx file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lyx/+bug/2069792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071815] Re: Investigate ASLR re-randomization being disabled for children
** Summary changed: - Investigate ASLR being disabled for children + Investigate ASLR re-randomization being disabled for children -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071815 Title: Investigate ASLR re-randomization being disabled for children To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2071815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071815] Re: Investigate ASLR being disabled for children
Subscribing Nick, who appears to be the original delta author. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071815 Title: Investigate ASLR being disabled for children To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2071815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071815] [NEW] Investigate ASLR being disabled for children
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: The systemd-socket-activation.patch patch has an Ubuntu delta to fix bug 2011458, but this results in ASLR not being re-randomized for children because the patch delta does "rexec_flag = 0;". This was discovered as part of the CVE-2024-6387 discovery by Qualys, and is mentioned in the disclosure itself: Side note: we discovered that Ubuntu 24.04 does not re-randomize the ASLR of its sshd children (it is randomized only once, at boot time); we tracked this down to the patch below, which turns off sshd's rexec_flag. This is generally a bad idea, but in the particular case of this signal handler race condition, it prevents sshd from being exploitable: the syslog() inside the SIGALRM handler does not call any of the malloc functions, because it is never the very first call to syslog(). This is also mentioned in the release notes of OpenSSH 9.8: Exploitation on non-glibc systems is conceivable but has not been examined. Systems that lack ASLR or users of downstream Linux distributions that have modified OpenSSH to disable per-connection ASLR re-randomisation (yes - this is a thing, no - we don't understand why) may potentially have an easier path to exploitation. We should investigate why that was needed, and if an alternative way of fixing the original bug can be done. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071815 Title: Investigate ASLR being disabled for children To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2071815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070497] Re: June 2024 security issue
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070497 Title: June 2024 security issue To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2070497/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069792] Re: lyx segfaults upon opening a .lyx file
Thanks, this is very helpful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069792 Title: lyx segfaults upon opening a .lyx file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lyx/+bug/2069792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070315] Re: error in /etc/cups/cupsd.conf from today's patch
It looks like upstream released a follow-up commit to fix this issue, or one similar to it: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/commit/145b946a86062aafab76c656ee9c1112bfd4f804 We will build test packages to see if this solves the regression, and if so, we will publish updates. ** Also affects: cups (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: cups (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cups (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cups (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cups (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sudhakar Verma (sudhackar) ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sudhakar Verma (sudhackar) ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sudhakar Verma (sudhackar) ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sudhakar Verma (sudhackar) ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Oracular) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sudhakar Verma (sudhackar) ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070315 Title: error in /etc/cups/cupsd.conf from today's patch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/2070315/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069792] Re: lyx segfaults upon opening a .lyx file
Hello, Thanks for the very complete bug report. I cannot reproduce any crash loading the file from command line. I do not see any error in the valgrind log, do you see one? Finally, gdb seems to show an infinite recursion in regex, but there is no way to see where it starts. Is is possible fr you to try to bisect your file, that is to find the smaller possible file that triggers the issue? Note that I neither have the right textclass (which is probably harmless) nor the bibtex database (which might trigger regex issues). Could you provide this bibtex database? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069792 Title: lyx segfaults upon opening a .lyx file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lyx/+bug/2069792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070037] [NEW] Extra /dev/sd.. entries for a fake raid
67aaccd1" /dev/md126p4: LABEL="Windows_10" BLOCK_SIZE="512" UUID="109ED0469ED025CE" TYPE="ntfs" PARTUUID="2759f468-2220-584d-ab3e-62a5ddb5f47c" /dev/md126p5: LABEL="Gentoo 1" UUID="ceffaa4b-695c-4490-9f9a-38aed1bc40a8" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="9df78387-1113-d941-a6e5-942008bb5c4a" /dev/md126p6: LABEL_FATBOOT="EFI_Gentoo1" LABEL="EFI_Gentoo1" UUID="3883-62B1" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="vfat" PARTUUID="68f07cf1-f9af-534b-9eb2-ff3d5100ad7c" /dev/md126p7: LABEL="Gentoo 2" UUID="c9247467-374b-41c2-a72f-57a37d3e6d7b" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="3f8de685-9ea2-9d40-abea-97d2c736c8c6" /dev/md126p8: LABEL="Gentoo 3" UUID="52118bfa-440a-48eb-9ad8-99749988c7fa" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="71d75852-4eed-d74f-b27a-8537d4a32581" /dev/md126p9: LABEL="LFS sysd 12.0" UUID="e6001dff-27e9-4388-b622-26c59ce80085" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="a613bf75-5047-8642-b545-ad0e7fe57d93" /dev/md126p10: LABEL="Ubuntu 24.04" UUID="dd12ff4e-9ed6-4d5b-a391-cce9bdcb264d" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="c17dede0-d4f6-5043-a0a7-bd9a4d6dba9c" /dev/md126p11: LABEL="Ubuntu 22.04" UUID="036f6f20-6b01-4d5e-8f42-e55ab46a9009" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="6ff7d372-c4bc-1b4c-8177-53cce534a39e" /dev/md126p12: LABEL="ISO Sytems" UUID="d2290b79-34a7-4251-80b7-9f8b024348c2" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="597e090b-f42a-4b4c-aaf0-454ee974ff7b" /dev/md126p13: LABEL="Clonezilla" UUID="e102e1d8-37ee-48c9-966e-4dc815b24ee1" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="158e6974-b5cb-3945-b734-2ed522900a72" /dev/md126p14: LABEL="Ubuntu Home" UUID="a6ebbfa2-b4f0-4701-9b69-5e680a245dcc" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="646cdd48-41cb-49aa-b2ee-9a08f7b7ca1e" /dev/md126p15: LABEL_FATBOOT="EFI_W11" LABEL="EFI_W11" UUID="62D0-9530" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="vfat" PARTUUID="5ed7b3c5-dbb6-9143-954f-2bf8022abe76" /dev/md126p17: BLOCK_SIZE="512" UUID="D66A58B46A58935B" TYPE="ntfs" PARTUUID="1cb07353-a2af-7443-9c23-dd34c1d482cb" /dev/md126p18: BLOCK_SIZE="512" UUID="802EB1582EB14844" TYPE="ntfs" PARTUUID="5643e2c3-e229-b449-8453-e0e82c615c45" /dev/md126p19: LABEL="LFS sysd 12.0 DE" UUID="6342936d-140d-4051-ad74-fed61623178a" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="9eb8029e-c372-47bb-8296-7989fa1cc382" /dev/md126p20: LABEL="LFS sysd 12.0 NE" UUID="6aff57b4-bc71-4e93-8807-db85c7e72d92" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="8fc6d76b-727a-42b2-be23-28467132a659" /dev/nvme0n1p1: UUID="E256-F414" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="vfat" PARTLABEL="EFI system partition" PARTUUID="fa0e08f9-fae7-43c8-b0f1-44ff1393d63c" /dev/nvme0n1p3: BLOCK_SIZE="512" UUID="D66A58B46A58935B" TYPE="ntfs" PARTLABEL="Basic data partition" PARTUUID="e4675753-429a-4a0c-a431-2107e592e315" /dev/nvme0n1p4: BLOCK_SIZE="512" UUID="802EB1582EB14844" TYPE="ntfs" PARTUUID="266e4a07-4320-4fd0-958c-19dba39fccfb" /dev/nvme0n1p5: LABEL="Ubuntu Home" UUID="a6ebbfa2-b4f0-4701-9b69-5e680a245dcc" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="93f66863-e60a-fb43-9e8e-d8de36e532a3" /dev/nvme0n1p6: UUID="37424a31-ede7-4e94-8636-4d5cfd37785a" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="45999b8c-ac59-4912-a4fc-a4986caad943" /dev/nvme0n1p7: UUID="4c886474-e36e-4922-a219-76b290862e0d" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="f891ad39-0a04-40c5-9bf7-97c57a7879fa" /dev/sda1: UUID="a6f4693e-1554-697b-5c93-edf466ac4f07" UUID_SUB="4ae0e931-99b5-a0aa-a50e-c9a1245047c2" LABEL="marc:124" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="9469133c-8706-514c-b2af-8ee0d7be61e9" /dev/sdb1: UUID="a6f4693e-1554-697b-5c93-edf466ac4f07" UUID_SUB="c9eda85e-a908-a537-d48a-2de4f3385145" LABEL="marc:124" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="3447f3d9-83fe-3843-9555-a85fead987bd" /dev/sdc1: UUID="a6f4693e-1554-697b-5c93-edf466ac4f07" UUID_SUB="2b3474dc-cb07-d17b-332c-c17dbebfacf9" LABEL="marc:124" TYPE="linux_r
[Bug 2067742] Re: [SRU] CVE-2024-36041 Fix ksmserver: Unauthorized users can access session manager
I have built packages in the security team proposed PPA for testing. Additional packages required no-change rebuilds in the -security pocket also. For Jammy, the additional packages are breeze, libksysguard, layer-shell-qt, kwin, kwayland-server. For Focal, the additional packages are kwin and breeze. Please test the packages in the following PPA, and post test results here, and I'll publish them as security updates: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security- proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067742 Title: [SRU] CVE-2024-36041 Fix ksmserver: Unauthorized users can access session manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-workspace/+bug/2067742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067742] Re: [SRU] CVE-2024-36041 Fix ksmserver: Unauthorized users can access session manager
ACK on the debdiffs, packages are building now! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067742 Title: [SRU] CVE-2024-36041 Fix ksmserver: Unauthorized users can access session manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-workspace/+bug/2067742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057687] Re: systemctl hibernate error: "Call to Hibernate failed: Invalid argument"
I have tried your workaround from #2 and hibernate works. Thanks Dmitry-a-durnev ! However, when I reboot my pc, I'm back to square one. Hibernate stops working till I execute the steps in #2 again. Any idea's ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057687 Title: systemctl hibernate error: "Call to Hibernate failed: Invalid argument" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2057687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065579] Re: [UBUNTU 22.04] OS guest boot issues on 9p filesystem
In response to comment #7, I have no issue releasing a security update regression fix for focal and jammy that relaxes the CVE fix for sockets since that is a change in behaviour. Let me know once the proposed patch has been successfully tested to resolve the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065579 Title: [UBUNTU 22.04] OS guest boot issues on 9p filesystem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2065579/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065579] Re: [UBUNTU 22.04] OS guest boot issues on 9p filesystem
This is the upstream commit which introduced the change in behaviour: https://gitlab.com/qemu- project/qemu/-/commit/f6b0de53fb87ddefed348a39284c8e2f28dc4eda There is no subsequent fix to the new restrictions, and the only more recent commit is one to deprecate the whole proxy backend: https://gitlab.com/qemu- project/qemu/-/commit/71d72ececa086114df80fe4cc04d701b59002eb2 I will investigate whether we can relax the restrictions to allow sockets. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065579 Title: [UBUNTU 22.04] OS guest boot issues on 9p filesystem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2065579/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065728] Re: CVE-2024-3044
These were all released: https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6789-1 ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065728 Title: CVE-2024-3044 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2065728/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059852] Re: Invalid free called during libfreetype FT_Done_Glyph
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059852 Title: Invalid free called during libfreetype FT_Done_Glyph To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freetype/+bug/2059852/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2039354] Re: GDM does not prevent users with login shell /sbin/nologin from logging on
Adding gnome-session as this is where the logic exists. I don't see any changes in the latest gnome-session script. Could you please file a bug with the upstream gnome-session developers here?: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-session/-/issues Thanks! ** Also affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039354 Title: GDM does not prevent users with login shell /sbin/nologin from logging on To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/2039354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2041751] Re: RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: network-manager-pptp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: pptp-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041751 Title: RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/2041751/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2045330] Re: Please remove these packages before 24.04 LTS release
** Changed in: openjdk-22 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: openjdk-22 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: openjdk-23 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045330 Title: Please remove these packages before 24.04 LTS release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/+bug/2045330/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058434] Re: leakage of private information through window list preview
** Changed in: mate-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058434 Title: leakage of private information through window list preview To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mate-desktop/+bug/2058434/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063034]
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is available, members of the security team will review it and publish the package. See the following link for more information: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures ** Tags added: community-security ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063034 Title: CVE-2023-28101: Metadata with ANSI control codes can cause misleading terminal output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/2063034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063035] Re: CVE-2023-28100: TIOCLINUX can send commands outside sandbox if running on a virtual console
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is available, members of the security team will review it and publish the package. See the following link for more information: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Tags added: community-security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063035 Title: CVE-2023-28100: TIOCLINUX can send commands outside sandbox if running on a virtual console To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/2063035/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063055]
** Tags added: community-security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063055 Title: Boot failure 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2063055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067044] Re: package man-db 2.12.0-4build2 failed to install/upgrade: error writing to '': Input/output error
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find. ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067044 Title: package man-db 2.12.0-4build2 failed to install/upgrade: error writing to '': Input/output error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/2067044/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066368] Re: package linux-image-5.4.0-150-generic 5.4.0-150.167 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-image-5.4.0-150-generic package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find. ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066368 Title: package linux-image-5.4.0-150-generic 5.4.0-150.167 failed to install/upgrade: installed linux-image-5.4.0-150-generic package post- installation script subprocess returned error exit status 135 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2066368/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065678] Re: nvidia-graphics-drivers-545 package fails to launch graphical session with latest linux 5.15.0-107 update
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065678 Title: nvidia-graphics-drivers-545 package fails to launch graphical session with latest linux 5.15.0-107 update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2065678/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066372]
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is available, members of the security team will review it and publish the package. See the following link for more information: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures ** Tags added: community-security ** Changed in: swaylock (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: swayidle (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066372 Title: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS - swaylock -v 1.5 - lock screen bypasses To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/swayidle/+bug/2066372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065728] Re: CVE-2024-3044
Since they are new upstream versions, and are already going through the SRU process, I'll wait until they are verified-done, and I will do a no- change rebuild of them into the -security pocket. Does that sound reasonable? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065728 Title: CVE-2024-3044 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2065728/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065728] Re: CVE-2024-3044
Thanks for the debdiffs, I will prepare packages in the security PPA and will comment back -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065728 Title: CVE-2024-3044 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2065728/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055776] Re: After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is assigned does not become active in KVM.
Well, the main impact for me was that after the update, suddenly the autostart of all Virtual Machines failed after a reboot, which to me is a seriously POLA violation and not something I would expect to happen within an LTS release. Even though you are correct in the fact that it was broken already and bind should not have gotten installed (it was as suggestied by samba) in the first place. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055776 Title: After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is assigned does not become active in KVM. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/2055776/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055776] Re: After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is assigned does not become active in KVM.
I'm sorry, but if this means that in the default configuration this is no longer working, how is this not a regression ? Should the default configuration not be so that both bind9 and libvirtd can be installed and used without issue as was the case before the dnsmasq update? Breaking this within an LTS release does not sounds right to me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055776 Title: After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is assigned does not become active in KVM. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/2055776/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062389] Re: [SRU] Fix segfault in systemdunitdependency probe
ACK on the debdiffs. Uploaded for processing by the SRU team. Thanks! ** Changed in: openscap (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: openscap (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062389 Title: [SRU] Fix segfault in systemdunitdependency probe To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openscap/+bug/2062389/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060880] Re: squid crashes after update to 4.10-1ubuntu1.10
The regression fix has now been published: https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6728-3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060880 Title: squid crashes after update to 4.10-1ubuntu1.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/2060880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062916] Re: evolution has undefined symbol in newest libwebkit2gtk
That is pretty odd, I can't reproduce this issue on jammy. what's the output of "ldd /lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062916 Title: evolution has undefined symbol in newest libwebkit2gtk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/2062916/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060880] Re: squid crashes after update to 4.10-1ubuntu1.10
Thanks for testing it, it's much appreciated! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060880 Title: squid crashes after update to 4.10-1ubuntu1.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/2060880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063093] [NEW] ppa remove error while upgrading to noble beta
Public bug reported: i tried to purge all ppa, but that did not solve the problem ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:23.10.14 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-28.29-generic 6.5.13 Uname: Linux 6.5.0-28-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CrashDB: ubuntu CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Mon Apr 22 11:22:57 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-03-20 (399 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Release amd64 (20221020) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2024-04-22 (0 days ago) VarLogDistupgradeAptHistorylog: Start-Date: 2024-04-22 11:13:54 Requested-By: mcheng (1000) End-Date: 2024-04-22 11:13:54 VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog: Log started: 2024-04-22 11:13:54 Log ended: 2024-04-22 11:13:54 ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade mantic wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063093 Title: ppa remove error while upgrading to noble beta To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2063093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060880] Re: squid crashes after update to 4.10-1ubuntu1.10
I have located the issue and have prepared an updated package that will reintroduce the fixes for CVE-2023-5824. I have uploaded the updated package to the security team PPA here: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security- proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages Once it has finished building, could you please test it in your environment and comment in this bug? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060880 Title: squid crashes after update to 4.10-1ubuntu1.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/2060880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061964] [NEW] Installation of ubuntu 24.04 raid array not detected
Public bug reported: 1. Ubuntu 24.04 Numbat (development) installation medium. 2. no specific package. 3. Installation of ubuntu should be possible on a partition of a raid array. 4. when doing the installation and selecting other (manual selection) where to install ubuntu; the raid array partitions are not shown. But when selecting try ubuntu the raid arrays are shown and accessible. ** Affects: mdadm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061964 Title: Installation of ubuntu 24.04 raid array not detected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/2061964/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061959] [NEW] Install 24.04 oh no something has gone wrong
Public bug reported: 1. Ubuntu 24.04 Numbat (development) iso. 2. No specific package: Booted from installation iso usb. 3. Desktop should be displayed. 4. white screen; in the middle "oh no something has gone wrong" after some time the welcome sound; and a small window appears in the upper left corner. From there the installation can be done. It is not possible to try ubuntu. ** Affects: mdadm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061959 Title: Install 24.04 oh no something has gone wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/2061959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061816] Re: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired
That's good to see! Since this is a deliberate side-effect of the security change, I am marking this bug as "invalid". Thanks ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061816 Title: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2061816/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061816] Re: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired
I think this is actually the correct new behaviour for the security update...could you please try using ap_trust_cgilike_cl as instructed here: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872 ** Bug watch added: bz.apache.org/bugzilla/ #68872 https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061816 Title: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2061816/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061816] Re: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired
Thanks for testing, I'll keep digging... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061816 Title: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2061816/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061816] Re: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired
I have uploaded a package with a possible fix to the security team PPA here: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security- proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages Once it's finished building, could you please give it a try and see if it solves the issue for you? If so, I will publish it as a security regression fix. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061816 Title: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2061816/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061816] Re: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired
I believe I've spotted the regression and will have a package to test soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061816 Title: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2061816/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061816] Re: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired
Thanks for filing this bug, I'll investigate the changes and will report back. Have you seen this behaviour on anything other than focal? ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) ** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061816 Title: apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.17 defaults to transfer-encoding=chunked where this is undesired To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2061816/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
