[Bug 1952353] Re: dmesg: read kernel buffer failed: Operation not permitted

2022-04-03 Thread Marji Cermak
I can now see that the dmesg command - starting with Ubuntu 21.10 - is NOT meant to work for the users in "adm" group. It is now meant to be run as admin or with sudo. This is a security decision. Described in here:

[Bug 1952353] Re: dmesg: read kernel buffer failed: Operation not permitted

2022-03-12 Thread Marji Cermak
I can confirm dmesg on Ubuntu 21.10 gives me "Operation not permitted", even though my user is in the "adm" group: $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 21.10 Release:21.10 Codename: impish $ ls -l /var/log/dmesg* -rw-r- 1

[Bug 1680283] [NEW] package shim-signed 1.27+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2017-04-05 Thread Marji Cermak
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1675870 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1675870 Public bug reported: I'm running Ubuntu Gnome 17.04 (installed from beta 2 ISO) on Dell XPS 13 9360 (early 2017, bought in Australia). I suspect this bug happened just during apt automatic upgrade after

[Bug 1198584] Re: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2013-07-14 Thread Marji Cermak
@jsalisbury, I'd love to help with testing this with the latest upstream kernel, but cannot because of this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197586 As I assume this is the Wireless driver related bug, there is no point in booting kernel 3.10 using wired etherned intead of wifi (which won't

[Bug 1198584] Re: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2013-07-14 Thread Marji Cermak
I can now onfirm (I just hard-rebooted :) that running iwconfig causes a crash - as described under #1159232. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198584 Title: general protection fault:

[Bug 1198584] [NEW] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2013-07-06 Thread Marji Cermak
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 13.04, 64bit on MacBook Pro 8,2, EFI mode, booted via grub-efi- amd64. A few seconds after I login to Gnome shell, I get a popup Error detected, do you want to report? I say yes and during that process, I get a console screen with general protection fault and the

[Bug 1198584] Re: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2013-07-06 Thread Marji Cermak
Please note that I submitted this error AFTER I had to hard reboot. Then I ran ubuntu-bug linux from a terminal window. Happy to provide more information. This general protection fault: [#1] SMP happens once every tens boot. As I can see wireless_process_ioctl+0x91/0x1b0 in the error

[Bug 1197586] [NEW] bcmwl-kernel-source 6.20.155.1+bdcom-0ubuntu6 Error! Bad return status for module build

2013-07-03 Thread Marji Cermak
Public bug reported: When installing kernel 3.10 on Ubuntu 13.04 64bit from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.10-saucy/ I get this error: Setting up linux-headers-3.10.0-031000 (3.10.0-031000.201306301935) ... Setting up linux-headers-3.10.0-031000-generic

[Bug 1157880] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source 6.20.155.1+bdcom-0ubuntu6: bcmwl kernel module failed to build on kernel 3.9 [wl_cfg80211.c:2025:3: error: too few arguments to function ‘cfg80211_put_bss’]

2013-05-27 Thread Marji Cermak
I can confirm that bcmwl-kernel-source 6.20.155.1+bdcom-0ubuntu6 DOES NOT build for kernel 3.9.4: $ cat /var/lib/dkms/bcmwl/6.20.155.1+bdcom/build/make.log DKMS make.log for bcmwl-6.20.155.1+bdcom for kernel 3.9.4-030904-generic (x86_64) Mon May 27 23:14:09 EST 2013 make: Entering directory

[Bug 1157880] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source 6.20.155.1+bdcom-0ubuntu6: bcmwl kernel module failed to build on kernel 3.9 [wl_cfg80211.c:2025:3: error: too few arguments to function ‘cfg80211_put_bss’]

2013-05-27 Thread Marji Cermak
Apologies. I must be sleepy. 1) I forgot to mention in previous post #25 that I'm not running ubuntu 13.04, but 12.10 with bcmwl-kernel-source 6.20.155.1+bdcom-0ubuntu6 installed manualy (from 13.04). 2) when I actually install the saucy versions of bcmwl-kernel-source